Le Sueur County, MN Tuesday, May 16, 2017 Board Meeting

Transcription

1 Le Sueur County, MN Tuesday, May 16, 2017 Board Meeting Item 8 10:30 a.m. Darrell Pettis, County Administrator/Engineer RE: Golf Carts/ATVs on County Highways Discussion RE: TH 112 Bolton & Menk Professional Services Agreement RE: 2017 Bonding - Draft Schedule of Events RE: Resolution to call for CIP, June 6th at 9:00 a.m. RE: Henderson Flood Mitigation Study RE: MnDOT Master Partnership Agreement RE: Subordination Agreement RE: Blighted Properties RE: County Credit Card Request for Brent Christian Staff Contact: Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 1 / 90

2 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 2 / 90

3 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 3 / 90

4 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 4 / 90

5 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 5 / 90

6 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 6 / 90

7 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 7 / 90

8 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 8 / 90

9 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 9 / 90

10 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 10 / 90

11 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 11 / 90

12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 12 / 90

13 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 13 / 90

14 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 14 / 90

15 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 15 / 90

16 Exhibit A SCOPE OF WORK AND DELIVERABLES Trunk Highway 112 Turnback Project PROJECT OVERVIEW This scope of services is for preliminary and final design for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of State Highway 112 located in Le Sueur County from the northbound entrance ramp at TH 169 through the City of Le Sueur to the intersection of County Road 115 (356 th Street). Funding for the project construction has been designated through the State Highway Jurisdictional Transfer Program to utilize State Turnback Funds for fiscal year Additional funding is anticipated through the Municipal 429 special assessment process for City owned infrastructure improvements. The project is anticipated to include the following elements: Project Elements: Rehabilitation of MN 112 (Main/Commerce Street) from the interchange of TH 169 to intersection of State Highway 93 (Bridge Street) Reconstruction of MN 112 from State Highway 93 (Bridge Street) through the intersection of County Road 115 (356 th Street) Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements Storm Sewer and Drainage Improvements Traffic Data Collection and Analysis at six controlled intersections and two pedestrian crossings Visual Quality Streetscape and Lighting Improvements ADA Upgrades This contract will include, but is not limited to, overall project management of the preliminary and final design consisting of public and agency involvement, existing field surveys, geotechnical evaluation, environmental site assessment and documentation, traffic collection and analysis, utility coordination and relocation plans, hydraulic analysis, roadway geometrics and construction limits, right-of-way impacts, permits, staging and traffic control plans, and development of final plans and bidding documents. 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Bolton & Menk will provide accurate and timely administrative and coordination services as necessary for the duration of the project. 1.1 Project Administration and Coordination Weekly Phone/ /Informal Meetings: Bolton & Menk will ensure effective coordination and communication with Le Sueur County and the City of Le Sueur throughout the project. To facilitate this, we will remain in contact with the County s project manager and City Engineer on an as needed basis, daily if necessary Monthly Budget & Billing: Invoices will be accompanied by a cover letter explaining the general status of the project; including at a minimum the work completed to date; the anticipated remaining efforts and required schedule changes; and a progress report form. Deliverables: Prepare and submit monthly progress and invoice reports. 1.2 Work Plan and Schedule Bolton & Menk will prepare and maintain a refined work plan (scope of work, budget, and schedule) based on ongoing discussions with the County and City. Deliverables: Submit refined work plan (scope, budget and schedule) on a monthly basis, at a minimum. Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 16 / 90

17 Exhibit A 1.3 Kick-off Meeting The Kick-off meeting will be held with County and City staff to relay information and to get a start on this project. Deliverables: Schedule and facilitate meeting. Prepare meeting agenda, displays, and minutes. 1.4 Project Management Team Meetings Bolton & Menk will facilitate a Project Management Team (PMT) that will consist of representatives from the County Public Works staff, City of Le Sueur Community Development, City of Le Sueur Engineering, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) State Aid Office, and other stakeholders identified by the PMT. PMT representatives will participate in the PMT meetings to ensure their respective department s interest is represented in the preliminary planning and final design process. The primary purpose of this work group will be to make design-related recommendations that can be supported by city, county, and state staff and elected officials, enabling continued progress on the project development. We have assumed a total of 9 PMT meetings; 18 month schedule for the preliminary design and a total of 18 PMT meetings; 18-month schedule for the final design. Deliverables: Schedule and facilitate meetings. Prepare meeting agenda, displays, and minutes. 2.0 PUBLIC & AGENCY INVOLVEMENT Bolton & Menk will provide staff and technical project information and displays for use during public meetings, we will also provide coordination for public, agency, and stakeholder involvement meetings. Tasks will include scheduling meetings, preparing meeting notices, coordinating venues, and bringing required meeting supplies (name tags, sign-in sheets, etc.). 2.1 Project Newsletter and News Releases Bolton & Menk will develop newsletters (up to six for bi-annual distribution) and prepare press releases prior to each of the three public information meetings for the project. The newsletters will be concise and easy-to-read, with current information and meeting announcements. Bolton & Menk will work with the County and City to determine appropriate news media and establish an appropriate news organization for the project. Deliverables: Prepare newsletters and press releases, which will be sent electronically or, if requested, as printed copies. 2.2 Public Information Meetings Public Information Meetings will be scheduled at approximately 12 month intervals over 36 months (for up to three or more as agreed upon) for the overall project plus one for each neighborhood and business district based on the project scope of rehabilitation or reconstruction (for a total of two neighborhood/business information meetings). If desired, Bolton & Menk can also use electronic means to reach an expanded group of local residents and businesspersons Public Information Meeting #1 Preliminary design phase to present recommended geometric layout, construction limits, and ROW impacts Public Information Meeting #2 Final design phase to present proposed construction staging, construction schedule, and traffic impacts Public Information Meeting #3 After bid award and prior to start of construction with purpose to prepare stakeholders for upcoming construction impacts, staging, schedule, traffic impacts, and community engagement. Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 17 / 90

18 Exhibit A Neighborhood Information Meeting #1 Preliminary or final design phase to discuss area specific improvements and project details related to the rehabilitation portion of the project Neighborhood Information Meeting #2 Preliminary or final design phase to discuss area specific improvements and project details related to the reconstruction portion of the project. Deliverables: Prepare meeting announcements, agendas, exhibits, and provide a written summary for each of the five public information meetings. 2.3 Exhibits and Layouts Our team will put forth extra effort in presenting technical project information in formats that can be easily understood by non-technical stakeholders. These will include graphically enhanced typical corridor sections and plan views. Deliverables: Development of branded project graphics and signature materials for distribution through print and electronic media. 2.4 Property Owner Meetings It is anticipated, based on past project experience that meetings with individual property owners or other stakeholders who wish to meet privately with consultants will be desired. We propose to host up to 20 property owner meetings to discuss potentially sensitive issues that are best vetted outside a public domain. The results of the meetings would be shared with the County and City and paraphrased for the PMT meetings. Deliverables: Schedule and facilitate meetings. Provide written summary. 2.5 Project Website Bolton & Menk will develop a project website to host project information and interim/final deliverables, related links, useful information (such as photography of examples) and to receive comments from interested persons. The project website will be used to solicit persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for newsletters and press releases. The use of social media project sites (Facebook and Twitter) can be explored at the request of the project team. Deliverables: Develop and maintain the administrative functions of the site and control inappropriate submissions while facilitating productive dialog and information exchange. 2.6 Agency Involvement City Council/County Board Meetings: Bolton & Menk will prepare for and attend four City Council and/or County Board meetings. The content and timing of the meeting will be at the discretion of the County and City Regulatory Agency Meetings: Bolton & Menk will prepare for and attend two meetings in the Project Area with agencies, such as Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and any others that have concerns with potential impacts of the project. The first meeting is intended, at the onset of the project, to identify any concerns of the agencies about potential project impacts and to seek their inputs for addressing such concerns. The second meeting is intended for Bolton & Menk to report on how the concerns identified were addressed. Deliverables: Schedule and attend meetings. Prepare meeting agenda, displays, and minutes. Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 18 / 90

19 Exhibit A 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Bolton & Menk will perform sufficient data collection, field studies, and analysis to provide a framework for design. 3.1 Data Collection Our team will conduct initial project set-up and control by conducting data collection that includes but is not limited to: electronic project area aerial photos and mosaic mapping, comprehensive planning documents and transportation plans, regulatory agency requirements, existing public and private utilities per City, County and State records, and existing right of way drawings and plats. Deliverables: Comprehensive document research file, including requested data clarification on unclear items or apparent conflicting data. 3.2 Private Utility Coordination We will request and compile both private and public utility record drawings for the corridor. Experience on similar projects has shown a great success when utility owners are involved in the preliminary design phase rather than waiting for the final design phase. To accomplish this, we will coordinate the following: Design Locate Ticket Request: A Minnesota Gopher State One Call (GSOC) will be made by Bolton & Menk to verify the locations of existing utilities according to a design or field locate as necessary Utility Information Meeting: We will coordinate and host a utility information or preliminary design meeting to expose and solicit feedback from the utility stakeholders. This level of involvement will minimize the number of surprises encountered during final design. Deliverables: Comprehensive utility owners contact list and utility base map. 3.3 Topographic Survey Bolton & Menk will complete a comprehensive topographic survey within the designated project area to supplement digital mapping provided by the County and City and provide complete and accurate base mapping to be used for preliminary roadway and corridor design Surface Topography: A topographic survey will be performed and accurately identify all the above ground improvements in the project area through an elevation.tin file Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Topography: A topographic survey will be performed and accurately identify all hydrants, valves, manholes (including visual assessment of condition), water main mainline and services, and sanitary mainline and services Storm Sewer Topography: A topographic survey will be performed and accurately identify all catch basins and manholes (including visual assessment of condition), and mainline storm sewer. Deliverables: A comprehensive topographic file and digital terrain model prepared in AutoCAD Civil 3D, and sanitary sewer and storm sewer manhole reports. 3.4 Existing Right-of-Way and Easements We will acquire documentation of right of way boundaries, which exist per recorded legal documents by searching the records of the County Recorder and Register of Titles. An initial base map will be generated from this research and will be modified, as appropriate, to reflect found monumentation when completing the topographic survey. Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 19 / 90

20 Exhibit A Deliverables: A final base map of the project corridor. 3.5 Coordinate Geotechnical Evaluation Bolton & Menk will coordinate with a geotechnical consulting firm for all geotechnical exploration and evaluation services. Typical preliminary evaluation techniques for this project will include either solid-stem auger borings or penetration test borings along the project corridor spaced at 1,000 foot intervals for approximately 23 total borings. In addition, both Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) will be utilized to evaluate existing pavement conditions throughout the entire project corridor. The GPR will provide pavement section thickness data in one foot increments, resulting in tremendous detail in pavement thickness variations. The FWD, used in tandem with the GPR, will help evaluate composite (including aggregate) pavement section strength characteristics, the traffic it can support and what pavement preservation or improvement techniques such as an overlay or reconstruction is necessary to provide for future traffic needs. Deliverables: Preliminary Geotechnical Report to include: boring logs, subsurface profile, R-values, and pavement design recommendations. 3.6 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Bolton & Menk will coordinate with a consulting firm for the completion of a Limited Phase I ESA. This type of assessment is recommended during preliminary design and will include a regulatory search report, which is a compilation of records of facilities that are included on current federal and state environmental regulatory databases. The regulatory report for the Phase I ESA will search databases that have been established by ASTM Practice E In general, the databases will be searched to a distance of one-quarter mile from the approximate corridor centerline. Along with the regulatory search, a historical records review including review of historical topographic maps, aerial photographs, and fire insurance maps will be performed to determine historical uses of the corridor. Finally, a site reconnaissance will be performed to observe current uses of properties along the corridor and the potential for environmental impacts. Interview of project personnel and/or properties owners may also be conducted at this time. Results of the regulatory search, historical records review, and site reconnaissance and interviews will be summarized within a Limited Phase I ESA report, including ranking all identified properties within the corridor as having a high, medium, or low potential for contamination based on criteria established by Mn/DOT. Results of the Phase I ESA will be discussed with the project team and whether any sites identified in the Phase I ESA present Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) and, therefore, may adversely impact the project. Deliverables: Final Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report. 4.0 TRAFFIC STUDY Bolton & Menk will evaluate existing and near-term corridor capacity and safety needs and prepare traffic control and geometric design recommendations for project construction in Data Collection Our team will work to collect and analyze traffic data along the project corridor. The traffic data that will be collected includes existing AADTs, AM and PM peak hour vehicular and pedestrian turning movement volumes, vehicle classification counts, and gap studies at the following selected intersections and pedestrian crossing locations: 1. Intersection of County Road 35 (Dakota Street) 2. Mid-block Pedestrian Crossing at Cheese Factory 3. Intersection of State Highway 93 (Bridge Street) 4. Intersection of N 2 nd Street Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 20 / 90

21 Exhibit A 5. Intersection of N 4 th Street 6. Intersection of Ferry Street 7. School Pedestrian Crossing at S 4 th Street and S 5 th Street 8. Intersection of S Elmwood Street/Ferry Street This volume information, along with facility characteristics including lanes, traffic control, alignments, speed, and driver behavior, will be collected as inputs into a traffic model that is to be used to determine how a facility is able to handle traffic in terms of mobility. Deliverable: Turning movement counts and traffic characteristics at eight intersections. 4.2 Crash Analysis Crash diagrams and trends will be analyzed to determine if underlying causes exist (ie. sight distance). A crash analysis will be conducted to determine potential safety improvements based on crash reduction factors and crash rates. Deliverables: Existing crash study and evaluation for improved performance. 4.3 Traffic Forecast Volumes We will complete a review of the available forecast year 2040 AADT volumes and establish growth rates throughout the corridor. Growth rates will be applied to the collected turning movement data to develop 2040 turning movement volumes for the intersections identified within Section 4.1. Deliverables: Traffic analysis of volumes per industry standard 20-year forecast. 4.4 Warrant Analysis Our team will conduct a justification analysis based on warrants in the Minnesota MUTCD for four two-way stop control intersections, one three-way stop control intersection, one mid-block pedestrian crossing, and one two-way stop school crossing. Recognizing existing intersection controls may no longer meet warrants, we will work with the City and County to determine the appropriate traffic control for these intersections and the corridor as a whole. This will include additional analysis at each of six control intersections and mid-block pedestrian crossing such as sight line, crash experience, pedestrian needs, and traffic operations. We will complete a planning-level evaluation of daily traffic volumes at the other 21 intersections in the corridor. As part of our public involvement process, we will educate stakeholders and elected officials of traffic control needs at specific intersections as well as the corridor as a whole. Intersection traffic control recommendations will be made on a corridor-wide basis and integrated with the preliminary geometric design. Deliverable: Warrant analysis and intersection control recommendations. 4.5 Parking Needs Assessment We will complete an assessment of parking along the entire project corridor. The assessment will include determining the number of on-street parking spaces, no parking areas, and areas with parking restrictions (time of day, duration of parking allowed). Within residential areas, we will solicit input from property owners on the need for on-street parking. Within the downtown business area, an onstreet parking occupancy assessment will be completed and include collection of number of parking spaces occupied. Future parking needs will be considered based on potential parking generators along the corridor, along with known deficiencies in available parking spaces as specifically observed downtown near Church and Dakota Street. Deliverables: Existing parking study and evaluation for improved performance. Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 21 / 90

22 Exhibit A 4.6 Traffic Operations Analysis Traffic operations along the corridor will be analyzed using Trafficware Synchro/Simtraffic 9 models for existing and forecast year 2040 conditions. Base models will be developed for AM and PM peak hours based upon observations of existing intersection geometrics and traffic control. The models will be further calibrated to most accurately represent existing conditions through the use of field observations of study area intersections. Measures of effectiveness from the modeling include intersection and corridor delay, level-ofservice, queue lengths, and volume to capacity ratios. These will be used to understand the current and future needs of the corridor and allow for the analysis of possible intersection traffic control changes and/or geometric changes from an operations perspective to determine the impact of the proposed change. Deliverable: Synchro/Sim Traffic model. 4.7 Traffic Summary Report The traffic summary report will document the results of the overall traffic study. The report will document the results of the crash analysis, forecast traffic volumes, warrant analysis, parking needs assessment, and traffic operations analysis. The traffic summary report will incorporate the technical analysis such that an intersection control evaluation report can be generated out of the information. Deliverables: Comprehensive Traffic Summary Report. 5.0 PUBLIC UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS Bolton & Menk will work closely with City staff to review condition and suitability of the existing water and sanitary sewer system within the corridor. As part of this analysis we will identify utility improvement recommendations for each project scope of rehabilitation and reconstruction. 5.1 Existing Plans, Available Data, and Evaluation Our team, with input from City staff, will review the completeness and accuracy of the topographic survey in identifying locations and elevations of sanitary sewer and water main utilities. This task will include the gathering of as-built information and review of comprehensive plans, I & I reports, water main break history, and available televising reports. Deliverables: Comprehensive evaluation of the existing sanitary sewer and water main infrastructure and condition. 5.2 Preliminary Design and Feasibility Report We will prepare a detailed feasibility report in coordination with City staff. Major components of the preliminary design and feasibility report will include the following: 1. Documentation of the existing public utility infrastructure system (location, elevations, including pipe types and sizes). 2. Recommendations for improvements based on outcomes of review of the pertinent comprehensive plans and study documents for the project area. 3. Proposed sanitary sewer and water main system improvements. 4. Discussions with City staff to evaluate pressure and flow of the existing system to determine if pipe sizes need to be increased or if hydrants and gate valves may need to be moved or added to the overall system. 5. Evaluation of all private sewer and watermain services. We will utilize televising and conversations with individual property owners to gather as much information about private services and possible need for replacement. Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 22 / 90

23 Exhibit A 6. We will advise the City if we feel it will be necessary to obtain temporary or permanent easements to construct the proposed utility improvements. Deliverable: Comprehensive Feasibility Report. 5.3 Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate Our team will prepare a statement of estimated quantities for all sanitary sewer and water main utility work consistent with the City s Standard Specifications and specifically, the City s method of measurement and payment. Deliverable: Sanitary sewer and water main Engineer s Cost Estimate. 6.0 PRELIMINARY DESIGN & LAYOUT Bolton & Menk through analysis and evaluation, along with close coordination with County and City staff, will refine and develop a preliminary project design and layout. This will include development of plan, profile, cross sections, and drainage considerations. 6.1 Geometry, Profile, Sections, and Construction Limits We will develop a roadway design layout for the proposed 2020 improvement project that illustrates the proposed roadway, sidewalk, and intersection improvements and features. Bolton & Menk will prepare design alignment, profiles, geometry, and cross sections using the agreed upon design vehicle and design speed. The Geometric Layout will be presented to the County for their approval and for comment by other project stakeholders, including final approval by Mn/DOT to establish construction limits for the project. Deliverable: Color Geometric Layout. 6.2 Right-of-Way Needs Our team will identify the right-of-way needs to accommodate a final project delivery. This includes permanent, temporary, and utility easements based on the construction limits defined in the preliminary design layout. Deliverables: Right-of-Way needs Layout. 6.3 Hydraulic Analysis Our team will analyze catch basin spacing and overall drainage to low points along the corridor to determine gutter spread. It is critical to understand potential surface flooding issues and storm sewer capacity early in design to ensure compliance with MnDOT State Aid drainage requirements. We will prepare a preliminary Hydraulics Report that summarizes drainage conditions, provides guidance on future stormwater improvements, and identifies easement or right-of-way needs for storm sewer, surface detention, or water quality improvements. Deliverables: Comprehensive hydraulic report and storm sewer stick map. 6.4 ADA Noncompliance Our team will complete an ADA field review to record cross slopes, longitudinal grades, and lateral clearances to document noncompliance of the existing corridor. An ADA report will be provided to document the deficiencies and make recommendations for improvements. We will also review the pedestrian accommodations and connectivity throughout the corridor in order to determine where sidewalk or trail improvements may be warranted. Of particular significance is the existing bit trail termini along County Road 35 (Dakota St) with desired Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 23 / 90

24 Exhibit A connection to Mayo Park and the lack of any sidewalk infrastructure along the southern portion of the TH 112 (Elmwood St) corridor. Deliverables: Issues Map for ADA and Pedestrian Design Recommendations. 6.5 Street Lighting We will analyze the existing street lighting based on type, spacing, and photometrics in order to understand lighting deficiencies and provide recommendations for improvements. We will also work with County and City staff to ensure any recommendations are consistent with agency preferences and standards. Deliverables: Existing and proposed street lighting maps and analysis. 6.6 Streetscape Plan Our team will work to identify aesthetic improvements to be included in the project consistent with the City and County desires and policies. Visual quality elements could include tree replacements, retaining wall treatments and other streetscape concepts. Deliverables: Streetscape Schematic Layout and/or Typical Sections. 6.7 Pavement Design Alternatives We will review the pavement design recommendations from the preliminary geotechnical report and complete a pavement design alternate analysis. The purpose of this analysis will be to determine the best structure to construct between bituminous or concrete, based on the life cycle cost. The lowest initial cost and equivalent annual cost over a predetermined analysis period will be determined to assist in the selection of the best pavement design option. Deliverable: Pavement Design Life Cycle Cost Analysis and Recommendation 6.8 Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate Bolton & Menk will identify a cost estimate for recommended improvements, project funding sources, and cost sharing agreement distribution. We will prepare a preliminary cost estimate for the 2020 improvement project by identifying initial estimated bid items and appropriate unit costs. 7.0 RIGHT-OF-WAY Deliverables: Preliminary Engineer s Cost Estimate. Based on the right-of-way needs identified during the preliminary design, the right-of-way acquisition process will be coordinated and led by subconsultant Henning Professional Services. Bolton & Menk will work with the subconsultant to coordinate all right-of-way services related to the potential acquisitions that we have assumed will be required for approximately 16 residential parcels and three commercial parcels. No relocation is included as part of this scope. The right-of-way services as part of this scope will include the following: 1. Title Work 2. Title Surveys and Mapping 3. Appraisals 4. Drafting and Presenting Offers 5. Negotiating and Finalizing Settlements 6. Submitting Right-of-Way Certificates Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 24 / 90

25 Exhibit A 8.0 FINAL DESIGN Bolton & Menk will develop and prepare the detailed design and bidding documents necessary for the construction of the project. We will prepare the construction plans for the proposed roadway improvements that are consistent with the geometrics approved during the preliminary layout phase. The format of the Construction Plans will comply with the MnDOT State Aid manual and all design files will be in AutoCAD Civil 3D. 8.1 Construction Plan Set The construction plan set may consist of, but is not limited to, the following sheets: 1. Title Sheet 2. General Layout 3. Statement of Estimated Quantities (SEQ) 4. Soils Construction Notes and Standard Plates & Plans 5. Typical Sections 6. Quantity Tabulations 7. Alignment Plan 8. Existing Utility Tabulations (electric, gas, telephone, cable TV, etc.) 9. Miscellaneous Details 10. Standard Plan Sheets 11. In-place Topography, Utility and Right-of-Way 12. Removal Plan Sheets 13. Construction Plan Sheets 14. Roadway Profile Sheets 15. Intersection & ADA Detail Sheets 16. Retaining Wall Plans 17. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 18. Proposed Drainage Tabulation 19. Drainage Plans, and Profiles 20. Pond Grading Plan 21. Proposed Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Tabulations 22. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Plans, and Profiles 23. Temporary Erosion/Sediment Control Plans 24. Turf Establishment and Permanent Erosion/Sediment Control Plans 25. Streetscape & Lighting Plan 26. Striping Plan 27. Signing Plan 28. Construction Staging Plans 29. Traffic Control Plans and Tabulations 30. Cross-Section Sheets Deliverable: Hard and electronic copy of final plans and specifications. 8.2 Private Utility Coordination Our team will continue the utility coordination process started in the preliminary design phase throughout final design. We will distribute construction plans for a utility design meeting discussing expected impacts around the 60% design submittal. We will work with owners on submitting final relocations plans and completing field verifications prior to completion of 100% design documents. Deliverable: All final utility tabulations, impacts, and relocation plans will be included in the final construction plans. Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 25 / 90

26 Exhibit A 8.3 Engineer s Construction Cost Estimate We will update the preliminary construction cost estimate with each plan submittal based on quantities and information at hand, starting with the 60% design submittal. Each estimate will include a breakdown of county and city cost sharing commitments, a risk assessment on quantities, and unit costs available at the time. Deliverable: Hard and electronic copy of engineer s construction cost estimate. 8.4 Coordinate Final Geotechnical Evaluation Bolton & Menk will coordinate with the subconsultant from the preliminary design phase for any additional geotechnical exploration and evaluation services during final design. It is anticipated that potential additional subsurface exploration during final design may consist of, but is not limited to, the following tasks: 1. Additional 20 solid-stem auger or penetration test borings within the roadway, spaced at 1,000 foot intervals, in-between the borings previously performed for a net 500 foot spacing. 2. Additional eight soil borings outside the roadway at proposed retaining wall locations. 3. Additional four soil borings at potential infiltration pond locations. 4. Additional geotechnical laboratory testing. Deliverable: Final Geotechnical Report to include all the information from the preliminary report, with addition of final pavement design recommendations, stormwater infiltration potential and estimated rates, retaining wall design recommendations, and comments on other items related to final performance or constructability. 8.5 Special Provisions Bolton & Menk will complete the Special Provisions for this project, including utilizing the County and City special provisions as requested. The special provisions will be submitted in addition to the full set of plans at 90% and 100% design submittals. Deliverable: Submit special provisions in a comprehensive and timely manner. 8.6 Plan Review and Approval Our team will submit Construction Plans and documents for review and approval at the following milestones: % Design Submittal: The 60% submittal will include hard and electronic copies of the completed plan sections as follows: Title Sheet, General Layout, Typical Sections In-place Topography and Utilities Alignment Plan Removal Plan Construction Plan and Profile Retaining Wall Plan Drainage Plan and Profile Pond Grading Plan Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Plan and Profiles Construction Staging Plan Cross-Sections The 60% submittal will be reviewed by City of Le Sueur and Le Sueur County staff. Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 26 / 90

27 Exhibit A % Design Submittal: The 90% will be the first draft of a biddable plan set and will include all completed sections provided at 60% submittal as well as remaining plan elements listed in Section 8.1 of this Scope of Work and Deliverables. The 90% submittal will be reviewed by City of Le Sueur, Le Sueur County, and MnDOT State Aid staff % Design Submittal: Upon making the revisions to the 90% Construction Plan submittal, we will submit two signed and certified set of bound prints, one AutoCAD C3D copy and one PDF copy of the Construction Plan with the vellum title sheet. The 100% submittal will be reviewed by City of Le Sueur, Le Sueur County, and MnDOT State Aid staff for final review and approval for bid letting. Deliverable: Submit all plan review deliverables in a comprehensive and timely manner. 8.7 Permits Bolton & Menk will investigate the requirements for all permits and approvals for this project including the Minnesota Department of Health Watermain Permit, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters Permit, and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. If any permit or approval is required, we will prepare the permit application for submittal to the agencies requiring them. Deliverable: Review and submit permit applications. 8.8 Bidding and Construction Consultation Bolton & Menk will assist Le Sueur County with contract bidding and award activities in accordance with County and State Aid requirements. We have assumed assistance with the following activities if necessary: 1. Advertisement for Bid 2. Distribute Bidding Documents 3. Response to Questions 4. Issue Addenda 5. Bid Opening and Tabulation We will also be available to answer questions concerning design during the construction of the project at the request of the County. We have assumed assistance with the following activities if necessary: 1. Attend preconstruction meeting 2. Answer design questions Deliverable: Prompt and comprehensive guidance and support during bid letting, opening, and construction. Scope of Work and Deliverables: TH 112 Turnback Project, Le Sueur County, MN March, of 12 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 27 / 90

28 Exhibit B Fee Estimate Subtotal Hours Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $45, $164, $57, $67, $47, $269, $20, $224, $37, $35, $47, $12, $12, $911, $129, Other Direct Costs Design Services (Preliminary & Final) Project Manager Traffic Enginer Municipal Engineer Water Resources Estimated Hours Principal Survey Crew Clerical Total Turnback Eligible Non-Eligible Hours Amount Amount Hourly Rates $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $98.00 $ $ $ $98.00 $80.00 Task Description 1.0 Project Management 1.1 Project Administration and Coordination , Work Plan and Schedule , Kick-off Meeting , Project Management Team Meetings (9 mtgs prelim + 18 mtgs final) , , Public and Agency Involvement 2.1 Project Newsletter and News Releases , Public/Neighborhood Information Meetings (5 mtgs) , , Exhibits and Layouts , Property Owner Meetings (20 mtgs) , , Project Website , Agency Involvement (6 mtgs) , Existing Conditions 3.1 Data Collection , Private Utility Coordination , Topographic Survey , Existing Right-of-Way and Easements , Coordinate Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation , Coordinate Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) , Traffic Study 4.1 Data Collection , Crash Analysis , Traffic Forecast Volumes , Warrant Analysis , Parking Needs Assessment , Traffic Operations Analysis , Traffic Summary Report , Public Utility Infrastructure Analysis 5.1 Existing Plans, Available Data, and Evaluation , Preliminary Design and Feasibility Report , Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate , Preliminary Design and Layout 6.1 Geometry, Profile, Sections, and Construction Limits , , Right-of-Way Needs , , Hydraulic Anaylsis , , ADA Noncompliance , Street Lighting , Streetscape Plan , Pavement Design Alternatives , Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate , , Right-of-Way 7.1 Title Work , Title Surveys and Mapping , Coordinate Acquisition (Appraisals, Offers, Negotiations & Settlements) , , Submitting Right-of-Way Certificates , Final Design 8.1 Construction Plan Set Title Sheet , General Layout , Statement of Estimated Quantities , Soils Construction Notes and Standard Plate & Plans , Typcial Sections , Quantity Tabulations , Alignment Plan , Existing Utility Tabulations , Miscellaneous Details , Standard Plan Sheets , In-place Topography, Utility and Right-of-Way , Removal Plan Sheets , Construction Plan and Profile Sheets , Intersection & ADA Detail Sheets , Retaining Wall Plans , Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan , Proposed Drainage Tabulation , Drainage Plans and Profiles , Pond Grading Plan , Proposed Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Tabulations , , Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Plan and Profiles , Temporary Erosion/Sediment Control Plans , Turf Establishment and Permanent Erosion/Sediment Control Plans , Streetscape and Lighting Plan , , Striping Plan , Signing Plan , Construction Staging Plan , , Traffic Control Plans and Tabulations , Cross Sections , Private Utility Coordination , Engineer's Construction Cost Estimate , Coordinate Final Geotechnical Evaluation , Special Provisions , , Plan Review and Approval 60% Design Submittal , , % Design Submittal , , % Design Submittal , , Permits , , Bidding and Construction Consultation , , Subconsultant (AET - Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering) $39, Subconsultant (AET - Final Geotechnical Engineering) $22, Subconsultant (AET - Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)) $17, Subconsultant (Henning Professional Services - Right-of-Way Acquisition) $123, Design Enginer Landscape Architect CAD Technician Registered Land Surveyor Survey Technician Graphic Design Specialist Subtotal Design Services $1,115, $129, TOTAL DESIGN SERVICES $1,244, Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 28 / 90 TH 112 Turnback Project Le Sueur County, MN 1 April, 2017

29 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 29 / 90

30 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $2,565,000 General Obligation CIP Bonds, Series 2017A Issue Summary Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 08/01/2017 Delivered 08/01/2017 CIP Bonds - Highway Maintenance Shop CIP Bonds - Non-Jail/LEC Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $1,030, $1,535, $2,565, Total Sources $1,030, $1,535, $2,565, Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.200%) 12, , , Costs of Issuance 13, , , Deposit to Project Construction Fund 1,000, ,500, ,500, Rounding Amount 4, (2,869.31) 1, Total Uses $1,030, $1,535, $2,565, Series 2017A GO CIP Bonds Issue Summary 5/ 9/2017 1:20 PM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 30 / 90

31 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $2,565,000 General Obligation CIP Bonds, Series 2017A Issue Summary Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 08/01/ /01/ , , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 25, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 23, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 22, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 20, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 17, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 15, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 12, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 9, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 6, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 3, , , Total $2,565, $341, $2,906, Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $15, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Series 2017A GO CIP Bonds Issue Summary 5/ 9/2017 1:20 PM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 31 / 90

32 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $2,565,000 General Obligation CIP Bonds, Series 2017A Issue Summary Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 105% Overlevy 02/01/ , , , /01/ , % 50, , , /01/ , % 47, , , /01/ , % 44, , , /01/ , % 40, , , /01/ , % 35, , , /01/ , % 31, , , /01/ , % 25, , , /01/ , % 19, , , /01/ , % 13, , , /01/ , % 7, , , Total $2,565, $341, $2,906, $3,051, Significant Dates Dated 8/01/2017 First Coupon Date 2/01/2018 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $15, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Series 2017A GO CIP Bonds Issue Summary 5/ 9/2017 1:20 PM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 32 / 90

33 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,030,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A CIP Bonds - Highway Maintenance Shop Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 08/01/ /01/ , , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 10, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 9, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 8, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 8, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 7, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 6, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 5, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 3, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 2, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 1, , , Total $1,030, $136, $1,166, Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $6, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Series 2017A GO CIP Bonds CIP Bonds - Highway Maint 5/ 9/2017 1:20 PM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 33 / 90

34 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,030,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A CIP Bonds - Highway Maintenance Shop Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 105% Overlevy 02/01/ , , , /01/ , % 20, , , /01/ , % 19, , , /01/ , % 17, , , /01/ , % 16, , , /01/ , % 14, , , /01/ , % 12, , , /01/ , % 10, , , /01/ , % 7, , , /01/ , % 5, , , /01/ , % 2, , , Total $1,030, $136, $1,166, $1,225, Significant Dates Dated 8/01/2017 First Coupon Date 2/01/2018 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $6, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Series 2017A GO CIP Bonds CIP Bonds - Highway Maint 5/ 9/2017 1:20 PM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 34 / 90

35 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,535,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A CIP Bonds - Non-Jail/LEC Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 08/01/ /01/ , , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 15, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 14, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 13, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 12, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 10, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 9, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 7, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 5, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 4, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 2, , , Total $1,535, $204, $1,739, Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $9, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Series 2017A GO CIP Bonds CIP Bonds - Non-Jail/LEC 5/ 9/2017 1:20 PM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 35 / 90

36 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,535,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A CIP Bonds - Non-Jail/LEC Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 105% Overlevy 02/01/ , , , /01/ , % 30, , , /01/ , % 28, , , /01/ , % 26, , , /01/ , % 24, , , /01/ , % 21, , , /01/ , % 18, , , /01/ , % 15, , , /01/ , % 11, , , /01/ , % 8, , , /01/ , % 4, , , Total $1,535, $204, $1,739, $1,826, Significant Dates Dated 8/01/2017 First Coupon Date 2/01/2018 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $9, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Series 2017A GO CIP Bonds CIP Bonds - Non-Jail/LEC 5/ 9/2017 1:20 PM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 36 / 90

37 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $7,325,000 General Obligation Jail Bonds, Series 2017B Assumes Current Market BQ AA+ Rates plus 25bps Credit Enhanced (AA underlying) Sources & Uses Dated 08/01/2017 Delivered 08/01/2017 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $7,325, Total Sources $7,325, Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (0.800%) 58, Costs of Issuance 58, Deposit to Project Fund 7,208, Total Uses $7,325, Series 2017B GO Jail Bond 5/ 9/2017 1:19 PM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 37 / 90

38 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $7,325,000 General Obligation Jail Bonds, Series 2017B Assumes Current Market BQ AA+ Rates plus 25bps Credit Enhanced (AA underlying) Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 08/01/ /01/ , , /01/ , % 93, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 91, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 89, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 87, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 84, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 81, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 78, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 74, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 70, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 66, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 62, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 57, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 52, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 47, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 41, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 35, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 29, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 22, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 15, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 7, , , Total $7,325, $2,480, $9,805, Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $87, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Series 2017B GO Jail Bond 5/ 9/2017 1:19 PM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 38 / 90

39 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $7,325,000 General Obligation Jail Bonds, Series 2017B Assumes Current Market BQ AA+ Rates plus 25bps Credit Enhanced (AA underlying) Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 105% Overlevy 02/01/ /01/ , % 279, , , /01/ , % 183, , , /01/ , % 179, , , /01/ , % 174, , , /01/ , % 169, , , /01/ , % 163, , , /01/ , % 156, , , /01/ , % 149, , , /01/ , % 141, , , /01/ , % 133, , , /01/ , % 124, , , /01/ , % 115, , , /01/ , % 105, , , /01/ , % 94, , , /01/ , % 83, , , /01/ , % 71, , , /01/ , % 58, , , /01/ , % 45, , , /01/ , % 31, , , /01/ , % 15, , , Total $7,325, $2,480, $9,805, $10,295, Significant Dates Dated 8/01/2017 First Coupon Date 8/01/2018 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $87, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Series 2017B GO Jail Bond 5/ 9/2017 1:19 PM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 39 / 90

40 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $4,490,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Issue Summary - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 11/05/2017 Delivered 11/05/2017 Current Ref GO CIP 2006A Current Ref GO CIP 2007A Current Ref GO CIP 2008A Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $1,255, $1,240, $1,995, $4,490, Total Sources $1,255, $1,240, $1,995, $4,490, Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.000%) 12, , , , Costs of Issuance 17, , , , Deposit to Current Refunding Fund 1,222, ,210, ,950, ,382, Rounding Amount 2, (2,497.89) Total Uses $1,255, $1,240, $1,995, $4,490, Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Issue Summary 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 40 / 90

41 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $4,490,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Issue Summary - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 11/05/ /01/ , % 15, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 30, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 26, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 22, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 17, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 11, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 5, , , Total $4,490, $242, $4,732, Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $15, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Issue Summary 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 41 / 90

42 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $4,490,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Issue Summary - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/ , , , (829.34) 02/01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , Total $4,732, $4,732, $4,989, $256, PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings , Net PV Cashflow 1.541%(Bond Yield) , Contingency or Rounding Amount Net Present Value Benefit $243, Net PV Benefit / $4,733, PV Refunded Debt Service 5.140% Net PV Benefit / $4,365,000 Refunded Principal % Net PV Benefit / $4,490,000 Refunding Principal % Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/05/2017 Refunding Delivery Date 11/05/2017 Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Issue Summary 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 42 / 90

43 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $4,490,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Issue Summary - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Current Refunding Escrow Date Principal Rate Receipts Disbursements Cash Balance 11/05/ /15/2017 1,222, ,222, ,222, /01/2018 3,160, ,160, ,160, Total $4,382, $4,382, $4,382, Investment Parameters Investment Model [PV, GIC, or Securities] Default investment yield target Securities Unrestricted Cash Deposit 0.11 Cost of Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds 4,382, Total Cost of Investments $4,382, Target Cost of Investments at bond yield $4,369, Actual positive or (negative) arbitrage (13,654.36) Yield to Receipt - Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Issue Summary 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 43 / 90

44 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,255,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Current Ref GO CIP 2006A - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 11/05/ /01/ , % 3, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 7, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 6, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 4, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 3, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 1, , , Total $1,255, $50, $1,305, Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $3, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Current Ref GO CIP 2006A 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 44 / 90

45 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,255,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Current Ref GO CIP 2006A - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , Total $1,305, $1,303, $1,355, $51, PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings... 47, Net PV Cashflow 1.541%(Bond Yield)... 47, Contingency or Rounding Amount... 2, Net Present Value Benefit $49, Net PV Benefit / $1,299, PV Refunded Debt Service 3.829% Net PV Benefit / $1,205,000 Refunded Principal % Net PV Benefit / $1,255,000 Refunding Principal % Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/05/2017 Refunding Delivery Date 11/05/2017 Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Current Ref GO CIP 2006A 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 45 / 90

46 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,255,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Current Ref GO CIP 2006A - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Current Refunding Escrow Date Principal Rate Receipts Disbursements Cash Balance 11/05/ /15/2017 1,222, ,222, ,222, Total $1,222, $1,222, $1,222, Investment Parameters Investment Model [PV, GIC, or Securities] Default investment yield target Securities Unrestricted Cash Deposit 0.11 Cost of Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds 1,222, Total Cost of Investments $1,222, Target Cost of Investments at bond yield $1,220, Actual positive or (negative) arbitrage (2,084.63) Yield to Receipt - Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Current Ref GO CIP 2006A 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 46 / 90

47 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $2,555,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A Prior Original Debt Service Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 08/01/ /01/ , % 24, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 20, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 16, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 12, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 8, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 4, , , Total $1,205, $150, $1,355, Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 11/05/2017 Average Life Years Average Coupon % Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/05/2017 Refunding Delivery Date 11/05/ A GO CIP Bds CR file SINGLE PURPOSE 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 47 / 90

48 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $2,555,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Date Refunded Bonds Refunded Interest D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest Refunded D/S 11/05/ /15/2017 1,205, , ,222, /01/ , % 24, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 20, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 16, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 12, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 8, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 4, , Total $1,205, $17, $1,222, $1,205, $150, $1,355, Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 11/05/2017 Average Life Years Average Coupon % Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/05/2017 Refunding Delivery Date 11/05/ A GO CIP Bds CR file SINGLE PURPOSE 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 48 / 90

49 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,240,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Current Ref GO CIP 2007A - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 11/05/ /01/ , , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 8, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 7, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 6, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 5, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 3, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 1, , , Total $1,240, $73, $1,313, Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $4, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Current Ref GO CIP 2007A 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 49 / 90

50 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,240,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Current Ref GO CIP 2007A - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2018 4, , (3,809.95) 02/01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , Total $1,313, $1,313, $1,386, $73, PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings... 69, Net PV Cashflow 1.541%(Bond Yield)... 69, Contingency or Rounding Amount Net Present Value Benefit $69, Net PV Benefit / $1,310, PV Refunded Debt Service 5.320% Net PV Benefit / $1,210,000 Refunded Principal % Net PV Benefit / $1,240,000 Refunding Principal % Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/05/2017 Refunding Delivery Date 11/05/2017 Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Current Ref GO CIP 2007A 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 50 / 90

51 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,240,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Current Ref GO CIP 2007A - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Current Refunding Escrow Date Principal Rate Receipts Disbursements Cash Balance 11/05/ /01/2018 1,210, ,210, ,210, Total $1,210, $1,210, $1,210, Investment Parameters Investment Model [PV, GIC, or Securities] Default investment yield target Securities Unrestricted Cost of Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds 1,210, Total Cost of Investments $1,210, Target Cost of Investments at bond yield $1,205, Actual positive or (negative) arbitrage (4,430.18) Yield to Receipt - Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Current Ref GO CIP 2007A 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 51 / 90

52 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $2,555,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2007A Prior Original Debt Service Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 02/01/ /01/ , , /01/ , % 24, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 20, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 16, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 13, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 8, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 4, , , Total $1,210, $176, $1,386, Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 11/05/2017 Average Life Years Average Coupon % Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/05/2017 Refunding Delivery Date 11/05/ A GO CIP Bonds CR fil SINGLE PURPOSE 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 52 / 90

53 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $2,555,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2007A Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Date Refunded Bonds D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest Refunded D/S 11/05/ /01/2018 1,210, ,210, /01/ , , /01/ , % 24, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 20, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 16, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 13, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 8, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 4, , Total $1,210, $1,210, $1,210, $176, $1,386, Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 11/05/2017 Average Life Years Average Coupon % Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/05/2017 Refunding Delivery Date 11/05/ A GO CIP Bonds CR fil SINGLE PURPOSE 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 53 / 90

54 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,995,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Current Ref GO CIP 2008A - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 11/05/ /01/ , , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 14, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 12, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 10, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 8, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 5, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 3, , , Total $1,995, $118, $2,113, Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $7, Average Life Years Average Coupon % Net Interest Cost (NIC) % True Interest Cost (TIC) % Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % All Inclusive Cost (AIC) % IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost % Weighted Average Maturity Years Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Current Ref GO CIP 2008A 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 54 / 90

55 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,995,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Current Ref GO CIP 2008A - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2018 6, , (9,401.78) 02/01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , /01/ , , , , Total $2,113, $2,116, $2,246, $130, PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings , Net PV Cashflow 1.541%(Bond Yield) , Contingency or Rounding Amount... (2,497.89) Net Present Value Benefit $123, Net PV Benefit / $2,123, PV Refunded Debt Service 5.832% Net PV Benefit / $1,950,000 Refunded Principal % Net PV Benefit / $1,995,000 Refunding Principal % Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/05/2017 Refunding Delivery Date 11/05/2017 Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Current Ref GO CIP 2008A 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 55 / 90

56 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $1,995,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 Current Ref GO CIP 2008A - Proposed Cur Ref 06A, 07A, 08A Assuming Current GO BQ "AA" Market Rates Current Refunding Escrow Date Principal Rate Receipts Disbursements Cash Balance 11/05/ /01/2018 1,950, ,950, ,950, Total $1,950, $1,950, $1,950, Investment Parameters Investment Model [PV, GIC, or Securities] Default investment yield target Securities Unrestricted Cost of Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds 1,950, Total Cost of Investments $1,950, Target Cost of Investments at bond yield $1,942, Actual positive or (negative) arbitrage (7,139.55) Yield to Receipt - Yield for Arbitrage Purposes % Proposed CR 2006A 2007A a Current Ref GO CIP 2008A 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 56 / 90

57 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $4,090,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2008A Prior Original Debt Service Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 02/01/ /01/ , , /01/ , % 40, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 34, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 28, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 22, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 15, , , /01/ , , /01/ , % 7, , , Total $1,950, $296, $2,246, Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 11/05/2017 Average Life Years Average Coupon % Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/05/2017 Refunding Delivery Date 11/05/ A GO CIP Bonds CR fil SINGLE PURPOSE 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 57 / 90

58 Le Sueur County, Minnesota $4,090,000 G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2008A Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Date Refunded Bonds D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest Refunded D/S 11/05/ /01/2018 1,950, ,950, /01/ , , /01/ , % 40, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 34, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 28, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 22, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 15, , /01/ , , /01/ , % 7, , Total $1,950, $1,950, $1,950, $296, $2,246, Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 11/05/2017 Average Life Years Average Coupon % Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 11/05/2017 Refunding Delivery Date 11/05/ A GO CIP Bonds CR fil SINGLE PURPOSE 5/ 9/2017 9:43 AM Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 58 / 90

59 Henderson Flood Mitigation Study Background Flooding in the Minnesota River Valley has created traffic and mobility challenges for MnDOT and local communities for decades. The roadways leading into and out of the City of Henderson (Highways 19 and 93 and County Road 6) have been hit especially hard in recent years, with closures due to flooding occurring more often. During seasonal flooding events, residents and commuters traveling through the area have been forced to use detours that take them miles out of their way, costing them both time and money. The lengthy detours and restricted access to the Henderson Area can substantially impact local businesses and regional traffic. Study Overview The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), in partnership with the City of Henderson, Sibley County, Scott County, and Le Sueur County, has been working on a feasibility study to investigate transportation improvements in the Minnesota River Valley to determine possible improvements that would minimize roadway closures due to flood events. The study is focusing on the bridges and approach roadways for state Highway 19, Highway 93, and Sibley County Road 6. Public Open House May 17, 2017 Roadhouse Event Center 510 Main Street Henderson, MN :00-5:30 Welcome & View Study Materials 5:30-6:00 Presentation 6:00-7:00 View Study Materials, Question & Answer You are invited to an open house to: View draft flood mitigation materials including: - Minnesota River hydraulic modeling - Roadway conceptual layouts Cost estimates Ask questions Give feedback The project information to be presented at the Public Open House is also available for review at: The outcome of this study will impact Henderson for generations. Please consider coming to any portion of this event, you and your involvement is what makes Henderson GREAT! -- Mayor Paul Menne N 6th Street N 5th Street Meet us here! Main St We look forward to seeing you there! Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 59 / 90

60 The goal of the study is to identify a feasible, safe and accessible, 10-ton route into and out of Henderson, which would limit the length of detours and impacts to businesses during high water events. Currently, there is no funding programmed for implementing flood mitigation improvements. The results of this study will compare the alternatives considered and evaluate their relative benefits, costs, and impacts. This information can then be used by the project partners to seek funding for further design and construction. To date, conceptual roadway improvements for the three routes that serve Henderson (Hwy 19, Hwy 93, and County Road 6) have been developed. Each alternative is independent of the others and would allow the roadway to remain open to traffic under a flood level equal to the Minnesota River crest during the 2010 flood event. The Highway 93 and County Road 6 alternatives involve raising the Study Area- Hwy 93/ Hwy 19/Hwy 6 roadway profiles to an elevation above the 2010 flood elevation and the Highway 19 alternative would raise and substantially lengthen the bridge across the Minnesota River floodplain. UV 14 As part of the study, each alternative has been preliminarily reviewed for benefits to users/motorists, environmental concerns (wetland, floodplain and floodway impacts), right of way and access impacts, and construction costs. A benefit/cost analysis for each alternative has been developed. A final study report is expected to be complete in fall Project Management Team A Project Management Team (PMT), comprised of staff from MnDOT, local governmental units (city of Henderson and the counties of Sibley, Scott, and Le Sueur) has been meeting regularly throughout the study process. The members of the PMT serve as a communication link to constituents and elected officials. Meetings have also been held with environmental review and permitting agencies. Photo Source: Mankato Free Press UV 8 UV?A 19 UV 16 UV 27 UV Henderson?õA@ Le Sueur Sibley?A 25 UV 6 Le Sueur? A@ UV 60 Scott Sibley UV 26 Carver Sibley UV UV 3 +? A@ GẀX Belle Plaine UV 28 UV 11 Scott UV 40 Le Sueur µ US Higway Minnesota Trunk Higway County State UV Aid 33 Highway County Boundary Study Roads- MN 93/MN19/CSAH 6 Contact Matt Young MnDOT Project Manager matthew.young@state.mn.us MnDOT District Bassett Drive Mankato, MN Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 60 / 90

61 T-number 1879A `7)4,44007-?/ PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL MASTER CONTRACT CERTIFICATION FORM f /63 SECTION 1 INSTRUCTIONS Complete form Master Professional/Technical Contract programs for: Checklist if not 2 copies of this Certification Form using SWIFT: RFP Submit to your Agency Contract Coordinator to obtain Department of Administration approval Checklist if using 71 Upload completed Certification Form to the SWIFT Event SWIFT: Attach the documents from the above checklist into SWIFT Event NOTE: No work orders may be issued until a master contract program has been approved and master contracts are fully executed. SECTION 2 BACKGROUND Department: Transportation (MnDOT) Estimated Cost of the Master Contract Program: $88 million (It is anticipated that individual master contracts will be capped at or between $25K and $1 Million depending on the size and location of the local government or agency.) Division: Operations Source of Funds (federal or state): Trunk Highway Fund * Master Contract Program Period: From: July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2022 and each Master Contract will be for a term of five years or until June 30, 2022 whichever occurs first. *The term of the original master contract program must not exceed two years unless the commissioner of Administration determines that a longer duration is in the best interest of the state. The total contract term cannot exceed five years. Minn. Stat. 16C.06, subd. 3b (b). If the original contract length longer than two years is required, please write a justification below: This master contract program is for local governments'/agencies' assistance with projects within the territorial jurisdiction of the local government/agency. Since competitive solicitation procedures aren't feasible for such assistance, running a master contract for as long as possible will reduce the administrative burden for both the state and the local government/agency. Nature of Master Contract Program (Give sufficient detail about what you need and why you need it. Do not use acronyms.) MnDOT will enter into "master" partnership agreements with local government/agency, pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sections , and (copies attached). These agreements will allow MnDOT to pay the local government/agency to perform certain work related to design, minor construction and maintenance. MnDOT anticipates Master Contracts with each county, some cities and government agencies estimated total of 230 contracts. This is a renewal of a program MnDOT has had in place since There are three major factors are driving the need for this program. First, MnDOT staff reductions, as well as flat gas tax revenues, require us to work cooperatively with the local government/agency to most effectively utilize the expertise of both state and local staff. Second, in many cases, the local government/agencies' personnel are more readily available to work on projects, which translate into shorter turnaround times, and better overall service to the public. Third, MnDOT has certain expertise and equipment and can help the local government/agency complete some tasks they cannot perform with their own forces. Master Contract Certification Form (7/14) 1 jay~ ry~ _TEA Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 61 / 90

62 This program will involve the following categories of work: These categories of work will have both payable and receivable components which means that the local government/agencies and MnDOT may contract for services from one another and that the funds can flow both ways. 1) Professional/Technical Services. The local government/agency or MnDOT provides professional/technical services. The local government/agency will provide staff to perform professional and technical services, which could include (by way of example and without limitation) roadway design, public involvement processes, and construction inspection and administration, This work could also include project management, which may involve the local government/agency hiring and managing sub consultants to perform such work. Often, the local government/agency can combine trunk highway work with their local projects (e.g. including a section of a trunk highway in the design of a county road mill and overlay design project), making such work much more coordinated and efficient. 2) Routine Roadway Maintenance. A local government/agency or MnDOT may provide roadway maintenance upon the request of the other party. Roadway maintenance does not include roadway reconstruction. This work may include but is not limited to snow removal, ditch spraying, roadside mowing, bituminous mill and overlay (only on small projects), seal coat, bridge hits, major retaining wall failures, major drainage failures and message paintings. 3) Construction Administration. The local government/agency or MnDOT lets and manages construction contracts. The local government/agency or MnDOT will provide more or less "turnkey" construction projects (subject to normal MnDOT reviews and approvals) on the trunk highway system, by combining state work with local work. For example, if a county has a mill and overlay project on a county road, MnDOT might request that it add a section of nearby trunk highway, so that the county will let a single contract including both the county and the state projects. This coordinates and delivers projects more efficiently and with less disruption to the traveling public. This also helps allocate work to the party (local or state) with the expertise most suited to the project. 4) Emergency Services. The local government/agency will agree to cooperate and share equipment and personnel in the event of an emergency. Having this mutual-aid agreement in place will allow the local government/agency to collect from the Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursement for emergency response. 5) Technical Services. Technical services will not require a work order contract, an or letter request will be sufficient. The providing partner must accept the request in writing via or letter. The local government/agency or MnDOT will provide staff resources to perform such work as repairing sign knockdowns, fixing damaged guardrails, filling potholes, removing animal carcasses, material testing or bridge inspections. In many places, county and city forces have a greater presence on the roads and are able to deal with these situations more quickly that having to dispatch a MnDOT crew from a distant truck station. This also frees up MnDOT staff to focus on needs to which the expertise and equipment of state forces is better suited. Product or Result of Work Order Contracts (Be very specific. Examples: Tape Transcription Services; Court Reporter Services) The product or result will depend on the category of work, but includes (by way of example and without limitation) materials testing, bridge inspection, roadway design plans, management of the public involvement process and related administrative work, construction inspection and administration, repairing damaged signs and guardrails, and performing work such as patching or ASA upgrades on trunk highways in conjunction with local projects. Other Methods Considered (Examples: In House, Other Divisions or Offices; Other State Agencies) The primary alternatives are use of MnDOT staff and outside contractors. Other state agencies do not have the expertise or equipment to deliver transportation projects, but the local government/agency do. As noted above, this effort is driven by the need to work more closely with the local government/agency to ensure that that state and local resources are used most effectively to deliver a "seamless" transportation system to the public. In accordance with Minn. Stat. 16C.08, subd. 3, provide the following (attach additional pages if necessary) 1) Describe how the proposed master contracts are necessary to achieve the agency's statutory responsibilities; These contracts are related to the design and construction of projects on the trunk highway system, and maintenance of those highways. The Commissioner of Transportation is required by constitution and statute to construct, operate, and maintain the trunk highway system, and is authorized by statute to contract for those purposes. The Commissioner is further authorized to provide assistance to the local government/agency for their local road systems. 2) Describe your plan to notify firms or individuals who may be available to perform the services called for in the solicitation other than advertising in the State Register or on the MMD website, or on SWIFT; and Master Contract Certification Form (7/14) 2 Le Sueur County Board Meeting - 5/16/2017 Page 62 / 90