Please note that the order of the agenda may change without notice. AGENDA ITEM #1.

Transcription

1 STEMOT SPRINGS ORD OF DJUSTMENT MEETING GEND Conference Room 3/4, Centennial Hall; 4 0th Street, Steamboat Springs, CO Thursday, November 5, 08 5:00 PM Please note that the order of the agenda may change without notice. ROLL CLL (5:00PM) PULIC COMMENTS: PULIC HERINGS GEND ITEM #. Project: M-8-03, Fairway Meadows Subdivision F, Lot 3 (STUFFER) Location: 745 River Queen Lane pplicant: Jason Lewis Type of pplication: Major djustment General Description: The request is to build a new duplex with adjustments to front setback, overall height and average plate height. CC Date: n/a GEND ITEM #. Project: M-8-, Rendezvous Trails Subdivision Filing No. Lot 4 (DOUGLS) Location: 670 urgess Creek Road pplicant: Thomas and Caitlyn McKenzie Type of pplication: Major djustment General Description: Request to enclose a carport CC Date: n/a

2 GEND ITEM #3. Project: Location: pplicant: Type of pplication: General Description: CC Date: M-8-, Yahmonite ddition to Steamboat Springs lock 5 Lots 3-4 (DOUGLS) 05 Thornburg Street Wes and Sheila Fountain Major djustment Request to adjust front setback n/a PPROVL OF MINUTES GEND ITEM #4. Minutes from the October 3, 08 oard of djustment Meeting will be reviewed for approval. DJOURNMENT The above applications are available for review and inspection during regular business hours at the Department of Planning & Community Development, 4 0 th Street, Steamboat Springs, CO. Three or more City Council members may attend this event and may discuss public business, to include information of public policy. For more information please contact Julie Franklin, City Clerk

3 GEND ITEM #. Staff Report Department of Planning & Community Development Project Overview Project Name Fairway Meadows Subdivision, Filing, Lot River Queen Lane Project Code M-8-03 Project Type Major djustment Project Description The request is to build a new duplex with adjustments to front setback, overall height and average plate height. pplicant Jason Lewis Zoning RN- Report Prepared y Toby Stauffer, ICP Senior Planner Through Rebecca D. essey, ICP Director of Planning & Community Development oard of djustment November 5, 08 Project Location Page of 8.

4 Fairway Meadows Subdivision, Filing Lot 3 (745 River Queen Lane); M-8-03 Report Date: October 30, 08 ackground The subject property is vacant with topography that falls steeply away from the road. The property is zoned RN-. djacent properties are zoned RN- and nearby zoning includes RR- and MF-. There are no other vacant properties in the neighborhood. Project Description The applicant proposes to build a duplex on the property with adjustments to front setback, overall height and average plate height. Dimensional Standards Overview STNDRD PROPOSED uilding Placement Lot Line Setbacks Front Principal building 0 3 ttached Garage Side 0, 7 Rear 0 > 0 uilding Form uilding Height Overall Height 40 max. 5 6 SW verage Plate Height 3 max NW Other Standards uilding Intensity 44 9 SW 4 SE Lot Coverage 35% max. 3% Density Dwelling Units per Lot max. Project nalysis The following section provides staff analysis of the application as it relates to sections of the CDC. It is intended to highlight those areas that may be of interest or concern to oard of djustment, Staff or the public. For a list of standards and requirements applicable to this proposal please refer to the CDC or contact the staff planner. General Criteria for pproval: Major djustment djustment Request: Section 05 RN- Dimensional Standards: a request for the principal building to be setback from the front property line 3 instead of 0 and for the garage to be setback 8 5 instead of 5. pproval Criteria Summary CONSISTENT? YES NO N Page of 8.

5 Fairway Meadows Subdivision, Filing Lot 3 (745 River Queen Lane); M-8-03 Report Date: October 30, 08 In compliance with all requirements Not a grant of special privilege Necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings Strict application of the standard is an unnecessary hardship No adverse impacts to legal uses or impacts accurately assessed Least modification possible ny existing nonconformities are part of request Consistent with CDC, Community Plan and other applicable plans Complies with waterbody setback additional criteria for approval CDC Section 78.D Major djustments may be approved upon a finding that the following criteria are met:. The property and the use of such property for which the Major djustment is requested meets the following: a. The property is in full compliance with all requirements of the applicable zone district. CONSISTENT The property is and the use will be in compliance with all other requirements except the adjustments listed.. The Major djustment will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and applicable zoning district. CONSISTENT Other uses and properties in the vicinity have similar circumstances and existing conditions, this adjustment will be consistent with the area. 3. The Major djustment is necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject property and to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the applicable zone district. CONSISTENT The adjustment to front setback distance is necessary due to steep topography on the site that drops off from the elevation of the road. The duplex needs to be closer to the road to be able to build a driveway that meets required grades. 4. The special circumstances of the subject property make the strict application of the standard an unnecessary hardship to the applicant, and the special circumstances are not the result of actions of the property owner or applicant. CONSISTENT The special circumstances on the property are steep topography on an existing platted lot. The subdivision was created with steep lots and is not the result of actions of the owner. Page 3 of 8.3

6 Fairway Meadows Subdivision, Filing Lot 3 (745 River Queen Lane); M-8-03 Report Date: October 30, The Major djustment will not injure or adversely impact legal conforming uses of adjacent property, or the applicant has accurately assessed the impacts of the proposed Major djustment and has agreed to mitigate those impacts. In making this determination, the oard of djustment shall begin with the assumption that variations from standards create impacts on adjacent properties and shall place the burden of proof on the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion for approval. Unsupported opinions of impacts from surrounding property owners shall not be conclusive evidence of impacts. CONSISTENT The adjustment to front setback will not impact other conforming uses. ny impacts from site construction or future use shall be managed on-site with typical construction, drainage and management practices. 6. The Major djustment is the least modification possible of the standard that will afford relief to the applicant. CONSISTENT The front setback adjustment is the least modification possible to make the driveway grades meet standards based on the location of the road and the steep topography on the site. 7. When considering the amount of variation requested, any existing nonconformity will be considered part of the overall Major djustment request. For example, an existing nonconforming structure encroaches five feet into the required setback, and the applicant is requesting a Major djustment to encroach an additional five feet. The Major djustment request shall be for a ten-foot encroachment into the required setback. NOT PPLICLE 8. The Major djustment is consistent with the purpose and intent of this CDC, the Community Plan, and other adopted plans, as applicable. CONSISTENT The adjustment supports residential use of this site which is consistent with the CDC and Community Plan. 9. Waterbody setback adjustments shall also comply with the additional criteria for approval for waterbody setback adjustments in Section 78.H. NOT PPLICLE djustment Request: Section 05 RN- Dimensional Standards: a request for the overall height of the building to be 5 6 from existing grade at its highest point. pproval Criteria Summary In compliance with all requirements Not a grant of special privilege Necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings Strict application of the standard is an unnecessary hardship No adverse impacts to legal uses or impacts accurately assessed CONSISTENT? YES NO N Page 4 of 8.4

7 Fairway Meadows Subdivision, Filing Lot 3 (745 River Queen Lane); M-8-03 Report Date: October 30, 08 Least modification possible ny existing nonconformities are part of request Consistent with CDC, Community Plan and other applicable plans Complies with waterbody setback additional criteria for approval CDC Section 78.D Major djustments may be approved upon a finding that the following criteria are met:. The property and the use of such property for which the Major djustment is requested meets the following: a. The property is in full compliance with all requirements of the applicable zone district. CONSISTENT The property is and the use will be in compliance with all other requirements except the adjustments listed.. The Major djustment will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and applicable zoning district. CONSISTENT Other uses and properties in the vicinity have similar circumstances and existing conditions, this adjustment will be consistent with the area. 3. The Major djustment is necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject property and to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the applicable zone district. CONSISTENT The adjustment to overall height is necessary due to steep topography on the site that drops off from the elevation of the road. Fill on the site will be employed to reduce the impact of the overall height upon completion of the build. dditionally, the adjacent properties appear to have been filled to make the ground level between this site and those nearby more dramatic. 4. The special circumstances of the subject property make the strict application of the standard an unnecessary hardship to the applicant, and the special circumstances are not the result of actions of the property owner or applicant. CONSISTENT The special circumstances on the property are steep topography on an existing platted lot. The subdivision was created with steep lots and is not the result of actions of the owner. 5. The Major djustment will not injure or adversely impact legal conforming uses of adjacent property, or the applicant has accurately assessed the impacts of the proposed Major djustment and has agreed to mitigate those impacts. In making this determination, the oard of djustment shall begin with the assumption that variations from standards create impacts on adjacent properties and shall place the burden of proof on the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion for approval. Unsupported opinions of impacts from surrounding property owners shall not be conclusive evidence of impacts. Page 5 of 8.5

8 Fairway Meadows Subdivision, Filing Lot 3 (745 River Queen Lane); M-8-03 Report Date: October 30, 08 CONSISTENT The adjustment to overall height will not impact other conforming uses. s indicated above, the adjacent lots have been filled and appear higher than this lot and fill will be used upon completion of the build to minimize impacts from the height. ny other impacts from site construction or future use shall be managed on-site with typical construction, drainage and management practices. 6. The Major djustment is the least modification possible of the standard that will afford relief to the applicant. CONSISTENT The overall height adjustment is the least modification possible to utilize the site while meeting the road at the current elevation and allowing for standard construction in the interior of the house. 7. When considering the amount of variation requested, any existing nonconformity will be considered part of the overall Major djustment request. For example, an existing nonconforming structure encroaches five feet into the required setback, and the applicant is requesting a Major djustment to encroach an additional five feet. The Major djustment request shall be for a ten-foot encroachment into the required setback. NOT PPLICLE 8. The Major djustment is consistent with the purpose and intent of this CDC, the Community Plan, and other adopted plans, as applicable. CONSISTENT The adjustment supports residential use of this site which is consistent with the CDC and Community Plan. 9. Waterbody setback adjustments shall also comply with the additional criteria for approval for waterbody setback adjustments in Section 78.H. NOT PPLICLE djustment Request: Section 05 RN- Dimensional Standards: a request for average plate height to be 40 8 on the northwest side, 44 9 on the southwest side, and 4 on the southeast side. pproval Criteria Summary In compliance with all requirements Not a grant of special privilege Necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings Strict application of the standard is an unnecessary hardship No adverse impacts to legal uses or impacts accurately assessed Least modification possible ny existing nonconformities are part of request Consistent with CDC, Community Plan and other applicable CONSISTENT? YES NO N Page 6 of 8.6

9 Fairway Meadows Subdivision, Filing Lot 3 (745 River Queen Lane); M-8-03 Report Date: October 30, 08 plans Complies with waterbody setback additional criteria for approval CDC Section 78.D Major djustments may be approved upon a finding that the following criteria are met:. The property and the use of such property for which the Major djustment is requested meets the following: a. The property is in full compliance with all requirements of the applicable zone district. CONSISTENT The property is and the use will be in compliance with all other requirements except the adjustments listed.. The Major djustment will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and applicable zoning district. CONSISTENT Other uses and properties in the vicinity have similar circumstances and existing conditions, this adjustment will be consistent with the area. 3. The Major djustment is necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject property and to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the applicable zone district. CONSISTENT The adjustment to average plate height is necessary due to steep topography on the site that drops off from the elevation of the road. Fill on the site will be employed to reduce the impact of plate height. 4. The special circumstances of the subject property make the strict application of the standard an unnecessary hardship to the applicant, and the special circumstances are not the result of actions of the property owner or applicant. CONSISTENT The special circumstances on the property are steep topography on an existing platted lot. The subdivision was created with steep lots and is not the result of actions of the owner. 5. The Major djustment will not injure or adversely impact legal conforming uses of adjacent property, or the applicant has accurately assessed the impacts of the proposed Major djustment and has agreed to mitigate those impacts. In making this determination, the oard of djustment shall begin with the assumption that variations from standards create impacts on adjacent properties and shall place the burden of proof on the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion for approval. Unsupported opinions of impacts from surrounding property owners shall not be conclusive evidence of impacts. CONSISTENT The adjustment to average plate height will not impact other conforming uses. s indicated above, the adjacent lots have been filled and appear higher than this lot and fill will be used upon completion of the build to minimize height impacts. ny other impacts Page 7 of 8.7

10 Fairway Meadows Subdivision, Filing Lot 3 (745 River Queen Lane); M-8-03 Report Date: October 30, 08 from site construction or future use shall be managed on-site with typical construction, drainage and management practices. 6. The Major djustment is the least modification possible of the standard that will afford relief to the applicant. CONSISTENT The average plate height adjustment is the least modification possible to utilize the site while meeting the road at the current elevation and allowing for standard construction in the interior of the house. 7. When considering the amount of variation requested, any existing nonconformity will be considered part of the overall Major djustment request. For example, an existing nonconforming structure encroaches five feet into the required setback, and the applicant is requesting a Major djustment to encroach an additional five feet. The Major djustment request shall be for a ten-foot encroachment into the required setback. NOT PPLICLE 8. The Major djustment is consistent with the purpose and intent of this CDC, the Community Plan, and other adopted plans, as applicable. CONSISTENT The adjustment supports residential use of this site which is consistent with the CDC and Community Plan. 9. Waterbody setback adjustments shall also comply with the additional criteria for approval for waterbody setback adjustments in Section 78.H. NOT PPLICLE Staff Findings Staff finds that the request for Major djustment for a new duplex on Fairway Meadows Subdivision, Filing, Lot 3, at 745 River Queen Lane, M-8-03, with adjustments to front setback, overall height and average plate height, is CONSISTENT with the Criteria for pproval for a Major djustment. Recommended Motion Staff recommends approval of the Major djustment with the following conditions:. The applicant shall address all comments provided by the Routt County Regional uilding Department on the building permit for the project.. Parking in front of the garage on Right of Way is prohibited. 3. Driveway width and grades are required to meet city engineering standards. ttachments ttachment Project Timeline ttachment pplicant Narrative ttachment 3 Plan Set Page 8 of 8.8

11 TTCHMENT Project Timeline Project Code: Project Name: M-8-03 Fairway Meadows Subdivision, Filing, Lot 3, 745 River Queen Lane DTES Pre-Submittal Meeting //08 pplication Submitted /0/08 TECHNICL DVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW TC Letter 3/0/08 Resubmittal 8/3/08 TC Letter 9/5/08 Resubmittal 0/6/08 TC Letter 0/5/08 Resubmittal TC Letter PULIC NOTICE Newspaper Notice /4/08 Mailed Notice 0/30/08 Property Posting 0/30/08 Mineral Notice PULIC HERINGS Planning Commission City Council N/ NOTES NOTES.9

12 .0

13 Request for the following.. Front setback adjustment 0 feet. If you look at the site plan the significant drop in the row is a very limiting factor to the overall design of a home for this lot. The distance from edge of pavement (river queen lane) to the property line is 0 and in that 0 distance there is of elevation drop to get to the property line. We feel that our proposed design meets this challenge that will ensure a design that will not only be functional but will adapt to the existing neighborhood quite well. We feel that by allowing approval for this adjustment it will remain consistent to the neighboring properties that most likely were granted the same type of adjustment in order to deal with this type of grade.. Existing grade average plate height adjustment as shown on plans. We are requesting an adjustment in this regard. We will only need this adjustment as for existing grade conditions. We feel that as shown on the plans that the overall grade of the lot is significantly improved over the existing conditions as it will meet the other final grades of the neighboring properties. The subject property sits in a hole that is approximately 7-8 foot lower than both properties to either side. 3. The design does not meet the height limit with existing grade however it DOES meet the overall height requirements upon final grade. This one goes hand in hand with the plate height adjustment requested. Due to the drop in elevation to get to the lot this lot requires a design as such. When working for 3 years on a design that involved 3 different architects really strived to find a design that would not only be functional for the site but would conform to the challenges this lot possesses. We feel that the design is one that will not hinder on any other home in relation to the subject property. We feel that by being granted these adjustments that the end result would deliver a build to the area that would enhance the overall neighborhood. 3.

14 Neighboring property to the Right: Ja son L ewis 4 S C enter Str eet Suit e 0 Cas p er, WY

15 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING Fairway Meadows - F, L3 745 River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO RIVER QUEEN LN 40 07/8/08 MRK REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL DTE DESCRIPTION STEMOT SPRINGS, CO This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER SHEET NME SHEET NUMER.3

16 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 ENTRY 99'-6" 07/8/08 MRK DTE DESCRIPTION This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL SHEET NME SHEET NUMER.4

17 .5

18 CH = S 6 57'8" W R = 0.08 FT L = FT CL = FT 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING RIVER QUEEN TOWNHOMES FOUND TK 438 PIN/CP RLS 438 TK SURVEYS UTILITY ESMENT S '00" E ' SEWER SERVICE PER MT WERNER S-UILTS NEEDS TO E CHECK THEY SID IT IS PROLY NOT HERE PROPERTY LINE SETCK LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIL CH = S 4 '4" W R = 0.08 FT L = 7.98 FT CL = 7.98 FT '- /" 5' EDGE OF DRIVEWY N 4 00'0 0" E LOT 3 '-0 " Fairway Meadows - F, L3 745 River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO S 6 30'0 0" W '-0 O " RET UL DE ININ RW G L L SE U O H H T LU IVE C R D t,, ' EDGE 8'-5" PVEMENT 5' 4' E N L N E HYDRENT MRK U E 07/7/07 Q cs ho,, E E. M.6394 S. I. RLS R ELECTRIC PED INCLINE VIST TOWNHOMES cs ho DTE REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL DESCRIPTION This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER IV '-0" RETI NING OULDER WLL 5' SHEET NME R 'TYPICL' FOUND ND USED EMSI RLS 6394 PIN/CP 6880 N 8 9 '53" W 9.t,, E. M.6394 S. I. RLS 6866 SEWER MN HOLE 0' 6864 QWEST PHONE PED '-0 " S, P LT # FIR WY ME DOW 6880 '-6 " cp pk stinger SHEET NUMER tob CUR STOPS E L T.6

19 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 07/8/08 REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL MRK DTE DESCRIPTION This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER SHEET NME SHEET NUMER.7

20 6 /" 5'-5 /4" 6'-" 8'-3" 8'-4/" '-5 /4" 8" 7'-0" '-/" 7' 3'-/" 4'-/" 69'-7" 7'-" 8'-7" 8'-6" 7'-0" 8" 4'-5/4" 8'-4/" C L C L C L C L C L C L '-5 /4" 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING C 4. D E F G '5 0'- /" ' 6'-9 /" ' 4'-6" 46'-3" '-6" 3' 3'-" 4'-8" 7'-0 /" 7' 4'-7 /" 4'-6" EQ EQ EQ '-3" '-3" ' 3'-6"555 C L C L C L C L C L C L 3' EQ '-5 3/4" 6'-3 3/4" 4'-3 /" STONE CP ELOW 08 5 /" 5 /" 7'-8" 0 05 ' '-5 3/4" ' '- /" '-6" +8" ENCH '-" 5/" '-6" FIRE CL. 3'-3" 6'-9" 5'-" 6' 4'-8" 3'-9" 3' '-0" 4'-/" 0 +8" HERTH 07 ELEV PWD 03 5'-" 5'-" 5'-3 /" 0 C L C L +36 MUD DECK 09 8" 5 /" 5' 7' 8'-0" 4' DN 7 5/6" LIVING 05 7'-0" x 5'-0" 00 94'-0" HETILTOR ICON 47 94'-0" ENTRY 0 C L 8' 03 99'-6" SE CS UNDER CLOSET (TYP) 4' DN 7 5/6" UP 7 5/8" FOYER 0 00 V 99'-6" 04 5 /" DN R@6" 6'-6" 0 STORGE R6'-4" 3 /" 08 ' 08 9'-0" x '-0" F.D. GRGE 3'-8 /" 99'-0" T EDGE ' PNTRY 0'-0" 4'-/" ' '-0 /" 9'- /" 03 DINING 06 6'-0" x 9'-0" DW 5'- /4" KITCHEN 07 3'-0" x 3'-0" HOOD OVE 45 F.D. 5' LIGN 4' ' 0'-4" ' 4'-7 3/4" ' REF. STORGE/ MECH ' 98'-0" T.O. DRIN 5 /" ' 4'-7 3/4" ' ' HR. WLL PER CURENT CODE G FILE NO. WP 3370 ' 4' REF. +36 STORGE/ MECH 09 4'-7 3/4" " 5/" LIGN ' F.D. 0'-0" 5'- /4" 5' 4'-/" KITCHEN 45 DW ' '-0 /" DINING 06 6'-0" x 9'-0" 07 3'-0" x 3'-0" HOOD OVE +36 9'- /" 03 4' 04 PNTRY 3'-8 /" 3 /" ' R6'-4" GRGE '-0" x '-0" F.D. 99'-0" T EDGE 6'-6" STORGE 98'-0" T.O. DRIN 5'-0" 5 /" DN R@6" '-6" DN 7 5/6" UP 7 5/8" LIVING 05 7'-0" x 5'-0" SE CS UNDER CLOSET (TYP) 4' 4' FOYER 0 ENTRY 00 C L 8' 0 DN 7 3/6" 00'-0" 00 V DECK 09 8'-0" 4' 8' 00'-0" 94'-0" 6' HETILTOR ICON '-0" 8" 8" 5 /" EQ '-6" 6'-6" +8" HERTH 5'-9" 5'-" 5'-" 05 C L C L MUD. 0 5'-" 0 5'-3 /" '-3 /" 3'-5 3/4" '-" ' EQ ELEV. 04 PWD 03 +8" ENCH '-6" ' C '- /" EQ L EQ 7'-4" 3' C EQ L EQ '-3" C L 7'-9 /" '-6 /" C L C L 7' 4'-7 /" 0'- /" ' 6'-9 /" ' 4'-6" STONE CP ELOW 5'-3 /" 3' '-6" ' 46'-3" C 4. D E F G 745 River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 00 5'-0" 6 3'-7 /" C L 7'-8 /" 4'-" 6'-" 4'-5 /" C L 8'-5 /" 4.3 4' 5 0'-/4" C L 0'-/4" 0'-/4" 0'-/4" 4' 4'-5/" " 0'-/" 0'-/" 8'-5/" 7'-/" 0'-/" 7' 3'-/" 4'-/" '-" 5'-9" '-8" '-6" 07/7/07 REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL MRK DTE DESCRIPTION This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER MIN LEVEL FLOOR PLN /4" = '-0" 00' = NORTH RROW SHEET NME SHEET NUMER

21 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING '-6 /" 8'-3" 7'-" 8'-0" 69'-7" C C C C C C L L L L L L '-8 /" 4'-" 4'-" 4'-" 7' 8'-0" 4' 0'-8 /" 7'-3" 6'-6 /" ROOF ELOW ROOF ELOW ' C 4. D E 33'-7" 4'-3 /" 5'-3 /" 7'-0 /" 7' 4'-7 /" 4'-6" '-7 /" C L C L ' 5'-5" '-5 /" 08 ' 09 ' 04 6'-9" 4' 4' 3'-/" C 3'-0/" L '-0/" 0 7'-0" ELEV. 04 5'-" 5'-" C L 06 OPEN TO ELOW ED 05 4'-4" 03 5' 9' " 09'-0" /8" DN TH 06 5'-9 /" W.I.C. 07 4'-6 /" 3' 8" '-4" '-8" EQ C L 0 EQ 8" 5'- /" 7'-6 /" 4'-7" 6" 6" +8 HERTH 6' 5' '-0" 0 C L 04 M. TH 03 R '- /4 " 6" SP TU SLEEPING SPCE COMPLINT WITH DIRECT VENT FIREPLCE M. ED 0 '-" UILT IN 6'- /" +0" TU DECK '-5 /" '-5 /" '-9 /" R/S '-6" F.D. 5'-" W.IC. 0 7'-5" 3 /" 3' 5'-9 /" +0" ENCH HR. WLL PER CURENT CODE G FILE NO. WP ' '-3" ' 7'-5" 3 /" 3'- /" '-0 /" '-3" 5'-" '-5 /" W.IC. 6'- /" SLEEPING SPCE COMPLINT WITH DIRECT VENT FIREPLCE M. ED 0 0 9'-9 /" R/S F.D. +0" ENCH '-6" '-5 /" UILT IN R '- /4 " '-" UILT IN '-7 3/4" 4'-/" 5' 5'-/" 6" 6" 6" +8 HERTH '-0" 04 M. TH 03 +0" TU DECK V C L SP TU 0 0 '-4" 0 '-8" 8" 7'-6 /" 4'-7" 5'- /" 3'-6" 4'-6 /" 3' 4'-6" '-9" 3' 3'-3" 5'-9 /" W.I.C. 07 R/S 4'- /" UILT IN TH " ' DN 4' 09'-6" 7 5/8" 9' 4'-4" 5' 4' 4' 4' 03 C L 04 OPEN TO ELOW 06 C L ED 05 7'-0" EQ 5'-9" C L 5'-" ELEV EQ 5'-" '-6 3/4" '-3/4" 4'- /" 7'-9 /" 5'-4 /" 7' C L C L 9'-9" C 4. D E 745 River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 ROOF ELOW F F G G 6 5'-9" 4'-5 /" C L C L C L C L 4.3 3'-4 /" 8'-" 5 4' 8' 4' 4. 7'- /" " 68'-7" 4 6'-0" 6'-7 /4" 3'- /" 6'-7 /4" 3 4' 8'-5 /" 4.3 4'-5 /" 5'-9" 07/8/08 REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL MRK DTE DESCRIPTION This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLN /4" = '-0" 00' = NORTH RROW SHEET NME SHEET NUMER

22 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 07/8/08 MRK DTE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NUMER REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved SHEET NME SHEET NUMER.0

23 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING T.O. CP '-0" 6'-3/" T.O. CP 9'-6" 6'-3 /" T.O. PLTE 5'-3/" UPPER LEVEL 09'-0" ENTRY LEVEL 99'-6" 3'-6" ' ' 3 0 ' ' ' 03 ' '-0" T.O. STONE 0 ' ' ' 0 ' 3'-6" '-6" 0'-6" T.O. STONE T.O. PLTE 6'-9 /" 4 UPPER LEVEL 09'-6" 7 ENTRY LEVEL 00'-0" = '-6" 7'-3 /" 745 River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 FINISH GRDE /7/07 MRK DTE DESCRIPTION This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER SHEET NME REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL SHEET NUMER.

24 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING LINE OF PVEMENT 6885'-0" 6877'-6" 3'- /" ' 6' 9'-6" 8'-0 /" T.O. PLTE 7'-6/" UPPER LEVEL 09'-6" ENTRY LEVEL 00'-0" MIN LEVEL 94'-0" 0'-6" PROPERTY LINE 6 7 '-8" 4'-8" 3' 6884'-0" 0'-6" T.O. STONE 687'-" G 4 08 F 6883'-8" 8'-4" LOT 3 - EXISTING 0' 3 0'-6" T.O. STONE 35'- 3/4" 6879'-3" VRIED SETCK '-4 3/4" '-4 /4" 6877'-4" 08 /4" 3'- /" FINISH GRDE ' 6875'-4" E 0 ' 6873'-4" D '-4" ' '-8 /" 43'-5 3/4" C 8'-0" T.O. CP ' ' 3 87'-6" T.O. STONE ' 97'-4" T.O. STONE 86'-6" T.O. PIER T.O. PLTE 8'-8 /" T.O. PLTE 7'- /" UPPER LEVEL 09'-6" T.O. EM 06'-0" ENTRY LEVEL 00'-0" MIN LEVEL 94'-0" ' 6' 9'-6" 7-'8 /" '-6" 4'-4" 7'-6 /4" 745 River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 LOWER LEVEL 83'-0" 6869'-0" 6866'-8" 6865'-5" '4" 6867'-4" 7 LOWER LEVEL 83'-0" 6864'-" 6863'-0" '-4" 4' 686'-6" 686'-0" 6863'-0" FINISH GRDE 6860'-9" 6859'-5" 6858'-" 6855'-8" 07/7/07 REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL MRK DTE DESCRIPTION 6854'-0" 6854'-0" This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER SHEET NME SHEET NUMER.

25 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING '-0" T.O. CP '-3 /" T.O. CP T.O. PLTE 6'-9/" ' ' T.O. PLTE 5'-3 /" 4'-7" ' 6' 9'-6" 8'-3 /" UPPER LEVEL 09'-6" ENTRY LEVEL 00'-0" 97'-4" T.O. STONE MIN LEVEL 94'-0" 87'-6" T.O. STONE 86'-6" T.O. PIER '-4" T.O. STUCCO 05 44' '-5 3/4" '-0" T.O. STUCCO 46'- /" 44'-4 /4" UPPER LEVEL 98'-6" T.O. STONE 09'-0" ENTRY LEVEL 99'-6" MIN LEVEL 86'-6" T.O. PIER 94'-0" 6'-3 /" ' 5'-6" 9'-6" 44'- /" 36'- /4" 745 River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 LOWER LEVEL 83'-0" LOWER LEVEL 83'-0" 68.7 FINISH GRDE '-0" T.O. STONE FINISH GRDE /7/07 REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL MRK DTE DESCRIPTION EXISTING GRDE This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER SHEET NME SHEET NUMER.3

26 C D E 4 VRIED SETCK F G PROPERTY LINE LINE OF PVEMENT 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING '-3 /" T.O. CP ' '-6" ' 3 ' ' ' 5'- 3/4" 50'-5" 45'-6" 4'- /4" 3'-5 /4" '-5 3/4" 86'-6" T.O. PIER 7 ' 6864'-" 3 FINISH GRDE '-3" '-9" 6867'-7" '-9" '-9" 86'-0" T.O. STONE '-9" 37'-3 /4" 6875'-9" '-6" 0 4'-8 3/4" FINISH GRDE T.O. STONE 6877'-9" 6866 FIRE CLOSET 98'-6" EXISTING GRDE '-9" FINISH GRDE '-7 3/4" 5'-3 /" ' 687 3' '-0" T.O. STONE UPPER LEVEL 09'-0" T.O. EM 06'-0" ENTRY LEVEL '-6" MIN LEVEL 94'-0" MIN LEVEL 83'-0" 9'-6" 5'-6" ' 85'-0" 77'-6" 6'-6" 745 River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L '-0" 07/7/07 MRK DTE DESCRIPTION This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER SHEET NME REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL SHEET NUMER.4

27 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 07/8/08 REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL MRK DTE DESCRIPTION This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER SHEET NME SHEET NUMER.5

28 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 07/8/08 REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL MRK DTE DESCRIPTION This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER SHEET NME SHEET NUMER.6

29 66 EST "F" STREET CSPER, WYOMING River Queen Lane Steamboat Springs, CO Fairway Meadows - F, L3 07/8/08 REVISED PERMIT SUMITTL MRK DTE DESCRIPTION This Drawing is the property of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS and is not to be reproduced in whole or in part. It is to be used for the project and site specifically identified herein and is not be used on any other project. This Drawing is to be returned upon the written request of RIVER VLLEY UILDERS. Copyright 07 RIVER VLLEY UILDERS, INC. ll Rights Reserved PROJECT NUMER SHEET NME SHEET NUMER.7

30 GEND ITEM #. Staff Report Department of Planning & Community Development Project Overview Project Name Rendezvous Trails Subdivision Filing No. Lot 4 (670 urgess Creek Road) Project Code Project Type M-8- Major djustment Project Description Request to enclose an existing carport that encroaches 3. into the east side setback pplicant Zoning Report Prepared y Through Thomas & Caitlyn McKenzie Residential Neighborhood One (RN-) Kelly Z. Douglas City Planner oard of djustment November 5, 08 Project Location Rebecca D. essey, ICP Director of Planning & Community Development Page of 4.

31 Rendezvous Trails Subdivision Filing No. Lot 4 (670 urgess Creek Road); M-8- Report Date: November 8, 08 ackground The subject property is located off of urgess Creek Road. It contains an existing single-family residence that was constructed in 996 and is zoned Residential Neighborhood One (RN-). In 000, the subject property was granted Variance which approved the existing carport s 3. encroachment into the east side setback condition of approval # states No permanent enclosure shall be erected around the carport or over the stairway leading up to the deck. The minutes from October 9, 000, indicate the oard of djustment at that time added that condition because they wanted to be sure such a proposal would be reviewed again by the oard of djustment. Project Description The pplicant is proposing to enclose the existing carport, no additional encroachment into the setback is requested. Project nalysis The following section provides staff analysis of the application as it relates to key sections of the CDC. It is intended to highlight those areas that may be of interest or concern to oard of djustment, Staff or the public. For a comprehensive list of standards and requirements applicable to this proposal please refer to the CDC or contact the staff planner. General Criteria for pproval: Major djustment djustment Request: Enclose a carport encroaching 3. into the east side setback pproval Criteria Summary In compliance with all requirements Not a grant of special privilege Necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings Strict application of the standard is an unnecessary hardship No adverse impacts to legal uses or impacts accurately assessed Least modification possible ny existing nonconformities are part of request Consistent with CDC, Community Plan and other applicable plans Complies with waterbody setback additional criteria for approval CONSISTENT? YES NO N Page of 4.

32 Rendezvous Trails Subdivision Filing No. Lot 4 (670 urgess Creek Road); M-8- Report Date: November 8, 08 CDC Section 78.D Major djustments may be approved upon a finding that the following criteria are met:. The property and the use of such property for which the Major djustment is requested meets the following: a. The property is in full compliance with all requirements of the applicable zone district. CONSISTENT The subject property is legally conforming. It meets all requirements of the zone district with the exception of the east side setback. The subject property was granted approval of , which permitted the existing carport s 3. encroachment into the east side setback.. The Major djustment will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and applicable zoning district. CONSISTENT pproval of this adjustment will not constitute a grant of special privilege. Other properties with special circumstances have the same rights to apply for an djustment. 3. The Major djustment is necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject property and to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the applicable zone district. CONSISTENT The Major djustment is necessary due to steep topography and access easements across the subject property. pproval of the djustment will afford the pplicant an enclosed garage, which is consistent with the privileges granted to other properties in the vicinity. 4. The special circumstances of the subject property make the strict application of the standard an unnecessary hardship to the applicant, and the special circumstances are not the result of actions of the property owner or applicant. CONSISTENT The steepness of the lot and the access easements across it preclude the garage from being located anywhere else on the subject property so strict application of the side setback standard is an unnecessary hardship. The special circumstances are not the result of the pplicant s actions, the carport was constructed in 000 prior to their ownership. 5. The Major djustment will not injure or adversely impact legal conforming uses of adjacent property, or the applicant has accurately assessed the impacts of the proposed Major djustment and has agreed to mitigate those impacts. In making this determination, the oard of djustment shall begin with the assumption that variations from standards create impacts on adjacent properties and shall place the burden of proof on the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion for approval. Unsupported opinions of impacts from surrounding property owners shall not be conclusive evidence of impacts. CONSISTENT Page 3 of 4.3

33 Rendezvous Trails Subdivision Filing No. Lot 4 (670 urgess Creek Road); M-8- Report Date: November 8, 08 The requested Major djustment to allow for enclosure of the carport will not negatively impact legal conforming uses adjacent to the property as no additional encroachment into the setback is requested. y enclosing the carport, the subject property will appear more orderly to adjacent properties and wildlife may not be as attracted to the area. 6. The Major djustment is the least modification possible of the standard that will afford relief to the applicant. CONSISTENT The requested djustment is the least modification possible to afford the pplicant an enclosed garage. 7. When considering the amount of variation requested, any existing nonconformity will be considered part of the overall Major djustment request. For example, an existing nonconforming structure encroaches five feet into the required setback, and the applicant is requesting a Major djustment to encroach an additional five feet. The Major djustment request shall be for a ten-foot encroachment into the required setback. CONSISTENT ll nonconformities on the site have been previously permitted. The subject property has a legal conforming status. 8. The Major djustment is consistent with the purpose and intent of this CDC, the Community Plan, and other adopted plans, as applicable. CONSISTENT The request to enclose the existing carport is consistent with the purpose of the Major djustment process to allow for variations to certain standards. 9. Waterbody setback adjustments shall also comply with the additional criteria for approval for waterbody setback adjustments in Section 78.H. NOT PPLICLE Staff Findings Staff finds that the Major djustment, M-8- for enclosure of an existing carport that encroaches 3. into the east side setback, is CONSISTENT with the Criteria for pproval for a Major djustment. Recommended Motion The oard of djustment approves M-8-, a Major djustment for enclosure of an existing carport that encroaches 3. into the east side setback at 670 urgess Creek Road. ttachments ttachment Project Timeline ttachment pplicant Narrative ttachment 3 Letters of Support Provided by pplicant ttachment 4 Plan Set Page 4 of 4.4

34 ttachment Project Timeline Project Code: M 8 Project Name: Rendezvous Trails Subdivision Filing No. Lot 4 (670 urgess Creek Road) DTES Pre-Submittal Meeting 09/06/08 pplication Submitted 09/8/08 NOTES TECHNICL DVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW TC Letter 0/3/08 Scheduled for hearing PULIC NOTICE Newspaper Notice /04/08 Mailed Notice 0/3/08 Property Posting 0/30/08 PULIC HERINGS oard of djustment /5/08 NOTES.5

35 ttachment Ph: Fax: P.O. ox Steamboat Springs, Colorado September 8, 08 City of Steamboat Springs Planning and Community Development 4 0th Street, P.O. ox Steamboat Springs, CO RE: Lot 4, Rendezvous Trails Filing No. Major djustment pplication Dear City of Steamboat Springs Planning and Community Development Department, Four Points Surveying and Engineering is currently making an application for a major adjustment to an existing residence, located at 670 urgess Creek Road, for a permanent enclosure of an existing carport on the residence constructed in 000. In October 000, the prior owners of the 670 urgess Creek Road, aka Lot 4, Rendezvous Trails Filing No. were approved for a request for a variance for a setback encroachment on the property by The approval was subject to two conditions:. No permanent enclosure shall be erected around the carport or over the stairway leading up to the deck.. building permit is required prior to construction of the proposed deck addition. Four Points Surveying and Engineering met with the City of Steamboat Springs Planning and Community Development staff on June 5, 08 to discuss enclosing the existing carport located on the McKenzie residence at 670 urgess Creek Road and the process for an approval to enclose such a building. The McKenzies are the second owners of the house since the carport was constructed. The house was constructed in 996 and associated deck with carport below was constructed in 00 after the oard of djustment approval. The planning department classifies this project as a major adjustment under the community development code (CDC) since it is a request for a modification to an approved variance. The City of Steamboat Springs CDC classifies a Major djustment as a process to allow for variations to certain standards in the CDC and to allow for limited development of nonconforming lots and alteration of nonconforming structures and structures housing nonconforming uses and is further described in Section 78. Currently, the property does meet the requirements of item one (c) in the CDC.. The property and the use of such property for which the Major djustment is requested meets one of the following: a) The property is in full compliance with all requirements of the applicable zone district; b) The lot is a legal nonconforming lot; or c) ny nonconformities on the lot are legal nonconforming structures or uses. The nonconformity was permitted by the variance approval

36 The applicable general criteria for approval, as stated in Section 78.D in the CDC, for this property are as follows:. The Major djustment is necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject property and to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the applicable zone district. a. The angle of the existing house on the lot and the existing access and utility easement for Lot 3 make for construction of a detached garage within the setbacks and not in an easement impossible. dditionally the existing grades around the house are 0% or greater which makes grading and retaining for a garage very difficult.. The special circumstances of the subject property make the strict application of the standard an unnecessary hardship to the applicant, and the special circumstances are not the result of actions of the property owner or applicant. a. The Rendezvous Trails subdivision was platted in 965 prior to the City of Steamboat Springs Zoning and Subdivision regulations. ased upon the current code a lot such as the McKenzie s would not be permitted for development. 3. The Major djustment will not injure or adversely impact legal conforming uses of adjacent property, or the applicant has accurately assessed the impacts of the proposed Major djustment and has agreed to mitigate those impacts. In making this determination, the oard of djustment shall begin with the assumption that variations from standards create impacts on adjacent properties and shall place the burden of proof on the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion for approval. Unsupported opinions of impacts from surrounding property owners shall not be conclusive evidence of impacts. a. The carport was constructed in 00 based upon an approval from the oard of djustment which conditioned that the carport not be enclosed. This restriction makes the enjoyment and use of the carport very limited. The owners have experienced wild animals in the carport and theft of personal property at times due to the unenclosed carport. Enclosing the carport will prevent foraging by bears, raccoons and skunks on Lot 4 and surrounding properties. In addition it will allow the homeowners to secure items under lock which they keep in a garage and enjoy enhanced privacy. 4. The Major djustment is the least modification possible of the standard that will afford relief to the applicant. a. The allowance for the enclosure is limited and requested to be within the existing carport therefore is the least possible modification to the standards. No additional encroachment to the setbacks will occur. 5. When considering the amount of variation requested, any existing nonconformity will be considered part of the overall Major djustment request. For example, an existing nonconforming structure encroaches five feet into the required setback, and the applicant is requesting a Major djustment to encroach an additional five feet. The Major djustment request shall be for a 4-foot encroachment into the required setback. a. No additional variation or increase in impacts to previously approved setback encroachment will occur by approval of the enclosure of the existing carport. 6. The Major djustment is consistent with the purpose and intent of this CDC, the Community Plan, and other adopted plans, as applicable. a. The major adjustment is consistent with the Steamboat Springs Community Plan as it will decrease impacts with wildlife the in urgess Creek corridor..7

37 dditionally, section 78.E Part states that the following applicable criteria for approval shall apply to Major djustment applications.. The Major djustment is the minimum necessary to fulfill the purpose and the need of the applicant. a. The applicant is requesting enclosure of the carport for reasons noted above.. The Major djustment shall not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and applicable zoning district. s noted above there will be very limited impact to neighboring properties and benefits due to wildlife impact reductions. This application is consistent with the purpose and intent for major adjustments to the CDC. We hope you will accept this application for major adjustment. Included with this application are the proof of ownership, this detailed narrative, and complete plan set including coversheet, existing conditions plan, and site plan. Please feel free to contact Four Points with any question, comments, or concerns. Sincerely; Walter N. Magill, PE-PLS Four Points Surveying and Engineering.8

38 ttachment 3.9

39 J. Lobeck 77 Ridge Rd Steamboat Springs, CO Oct 4, 08 To City Planning, We are a neighbor of the McKenzie family at 670 urgess Creek Road. They alerted us to their proposal to enclose their carport, and we are in favor of the proposal. Living so close to the national forest boundary creates conflict with wildlife. I believe enclosing the garage is better for the family and the wildlife. This proposed enclosure has no effect on the neighborhood as it does not change the existing footprint of the structure We are in support of their proposal and see no harmful effects or additional hardship caused on the neighborhood from the enclosure of their carport into a garage. Sincerely, Jessica Lobeck.0

40 0//08 To whom it may concern, We are a neighbor of the McKenzie family at 670 urgess Creek Road. They alerted us to their proposal to enclose their carport, and we are in favor of the proposal. Living on urgess Creek Road, we understand the constraints of steep topography and easements. dditionally, living near the boundary of the national forest, the neighborhood commonly sees the passing of moose, bear, racoons, and skunk, which make a garage important to enclose belongings and trash. This proposal makes it safer for the animals not to be ingesting trash and safer for the family to not entice the animals to frequently come looking for trash cans. We are in support of their proposal and see that no harmful visual effects nor hardship will be caused to anyone in the neighborhood from the enclosure of their carport into a garage. Kindly, Heather Craigen Heather & Robin Craigen 750 urgess Creek RD Steamboat Springs CO

41 Kelly Douglas From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Caitlyn McKenzie Tuesday, October 09, 08 0:45 PM Kelly Douglas Fwd: Caitlyn Mckenzie remodel Follow up Flagged Kelly, It was nice to meet you on Monday. I received one more neighbor letter below. Thanks, Caitlyn McKenzie caitlynmckenzie@gmail.com o. (970) c. (860) Forwarded message From: Scott Campbell <campbellproperties@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, Oct, 08 at 6:58 PM Subject: Caitlyn Mckenzie remodel To: caitlynmckenzie@gmail.com <caitlynmckenzie@gmail.com> To whom it may concern, my wife and I live just uphill from Caitlyn McKenzie and her family. It is our understanding that they wish to enclose their carport and convert it to an enclosed garage. We do not have any objection to their proposal and believe it will be a benefit notonly tot hem but to our neighborhood in general. Do not hesitate to contact me at the number below if you have any questions or concerns. Regards, Scott Campbell 69 urgess Creek Road Steamboat Springs, CO campbellproperties@yahoo.com Today is the oldest you have ever been, yet the youngest you will ever be. Enjoy every day as if it were your last!.

42 Kelly Douglas From: Sent: To: Subject: ttachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Friday, October 6, 08 :3 M Michael Fitz; Kelly Douglas M-8-: bears Video.MOV; TT0000.txt; Video_.MOV; TT0000.txt Follow up Flagged Michael/ Kelly, I have a few recorded videos of bears wandering thru the carport, it happens most nights, but I saved a few of the clips. Note: they have been IN our cars and IN our house before as well!! See the record as this was our house this spring: eating elk carcass the record for monday May 8 08/ can you add to our file? Caitlyn Mckenzie Caitlynmckenzie@gmail.com.3

43 MJOR DJUSTMENT PPLICTION ttachment Feet COVER SHEET & EXISTING CONDITIONS PLN Horizontal Scale 0' 0 0' 0' 40' " = 0' Four Points Surveying and Engineering 440 South Lincoln ve., Suite 4 P.O. ox , Steamboat Springs, CO (970) wnmpepls@gmail.com.4

44 SITE PLN 0' Horizontal Scale 0 0' 0' 40' " = 0' Four Points Surveying and Engineering 440 South Lincoln ve., Suite 4 P.O. ox , Steamboat Springs, CO (970) wnmpepls@gmail.com.5

45 .6

46 CITY OF STEMOT SPRINGS, COLORDO RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE ORD OF DJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF STEMOT SPRINGS PPROVING N PPLICTION FOR MJOR DJUSTMENT M-8-, RENDEZVOUS TRILS SUDIVISION FILING NO. LOT 4 (670 URGESS CREEK ROD) WHERES, on September 8, 08, Thomas and Caitlyn McKenzie ( pplicant ) submitted an application for the approval of a Major djustment M-8- ( pplication ) for enclosure of an existing carport that encroaches 3. into the east side setback ( Project ) on the property located at 670 urgess Creek Road and more particularly described as Rendezvous Trails Subdivision Filing No. Lot 4; and WHERES, the oard of djustment held a public hearing on the pplication on November 5, 08, to consider testimony from the pplicant, staff, and the general public regarding the application; and WHERES, the public hearing was duly noticed in accordance with Section 703 of the City of Steamboat Springs Community Development Code ( CDC ) by posting, publication, and mailing to surrounding property owners and to the owners of mineral rights, if any; and WHERES, CDC criteria for approval of the Project are set forth in CDC Section 78.D; and WHERES, having considered the testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing on November 5, 08, the oard of djustment hereby finds, for the reasons set forth in the Department of Planning and Community Development staff report dated November 8, 08, that the following criteria have been met:. The property and the use of such property for which the Major djustment is requested meets the following: The property is in full compliance with all requirements of the applicable zone district.. The Major djustment will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and applicable zoning district. 3. The Major djustment is necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject property and to.7

47 provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the applicable zone district. 4. The special circumstances of the subject property make the strict application of the standard an unnecessary hardship to the applicant, and the special circumstances are not the result of actions of the property owner or applicant. 5. The Major djustment will not injure or adversely impact legal conforming uses of adjacent property, or the applicant has accurately assessed the impacts of the proposed Major djustment and has agreed to mitigate those impacts. In making this determination, the oard of djustment shall begin with the assumption that variations from standards create impacts on adjacent properties and shall place the burden of proof on the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion for approval. Unsupported opinions of impacts from surrounding property owners shall not be conclusive evidence of impacts. 6. The Major djustment is the least modification possible of the standard that will afford relief to the applicant. 7. When considering the amount of variation requested, any existing nonconformity will be considered part of the overall Major djustment request. For example, an existing nonconforming structure encroaches five feet into the required setback, and the applicant is requesting a Major djustment to encroach an additional five feet. The Major djustment request shall be for a ten-foot encroachment into the required setback. 8. The Major djustment is consistent with the purpose and intent of this CDC, the Community Plan, and other adopted plans, as applicable. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREY RESOLVED Y THE ORD OF DJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF STEMOT SPRINGS, THT: SECTION. The foregoing recitals are incorporated by reference as the findings and determinations of the oard of djustment. SECTION. The oard of djustment hereby approves the pplication..8

48 PSSED, DOPTED, ND PPROVED this day of, 08. TTEST: James J. Moylan, Chair oard of djustment Julie Franklin, CMC, City Clerk [Remainder of page left intentionally blank].9

49 GEND ITEM #3. Staff Report Department of Planning & Community Development Project Overview Project Name Yahmonite ddition to Steamboat Springs lock 5 Lots 3-4 (05 Thornburg Street) Project Code Project Type Project Description pplicant Zoning Report Prepared y Through M-8- Major djustment Request to adjust the front setback from 5 to 9 for an addition to the attached garage Wes & Sheila Fountain Residential Neighborhood Two (RN-) Kelly Z. Douglas City Planner oard of djustment November 5, 08 Project Location Rebecca D. essey, ICP Director of Planning & Community Development Page of 4 3.

50 Yahmonite dd to Steamboat Springs lock 5 Lots 3-4 (05 Thornburg Street); M-8- Report Date: November 8, 08 ackground The subject property contains an existing single-family residence that was constructed in 977. The structure is legally conforming with M-5-08, which approved the existing home s 6 encroachment into the attached garage front setback. There is one driveway off Thornburg Street accessing the property. Project Description The pplicant is proposing to renovate the existing home. The renovation includes plans to reconfigure the entry and expand the attached one car garage to be a two car garage. In order to expand the garage, given the location of the existing home, a Major djustment to allow a 9 front setback, or 6 total encroachment into the attached garage front setback, is needed. Project nalysis The following section provides staff analysis of the application as it relates to key sections of the CDC. It is intended to highlight those areas that may be of interest or concern to oard of djustment, Staff or the public. For a comprehensive list of standards and requirements applicable to this proposal please refer to the CDC or contact the staff planner. General Criteria for pproval: Major djustment djustment Request: 9 ttached Garage Front Setback 6 Encroachment pproval Criteria Summary In compliance with all requirements Not a grant of special privilege Necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings Strict application of the standard is an unnecessary hardship No adverse impacts to legal uses or impacts accurately assessed Least modification possible ny existing nonconformities are part of request Consistent with CDC, Community Plan and other applicable plans Complies with waterbody setback additional criteria for approval CONSISTENT? YES NO N CDC Section 78.D Major djustments may be approved upon a finding that the following criteria are met:. The property and the use of such property for which the Major djustment is requested meets the following: a. The property is in full compliance with all requirements of the applicable zone district. CONSISTENT Page of 4 3.

51 Yahmonite dd to Steamboat Springs lock 5 Lots 3-4 (05 Thornburg Street); M-8- Report Date: November 8, 08 The subject property is legally conforming. It meets all requirements of the zone district with the exception of the front setback. It was granted approval of M-5-08, which permitted the existing home s 6 encroachment into the attached garage front setback.. The Major djustment will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and applicable zoning district. CONSISTENT pproval of this adjustment will not constitute a grant of special privilege. Other properties with special circumstances have the same rights to apply for an djustment. 3. The Major djustment is necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject property and to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the applicable zone district. CONSISTENT The Major djustment is necessary due to the location of the existing home that was constructed in advance of current zone district standards. Expanding the existing garage is the most practical course of action for the pplicant to meet their needs. pproval of the requested djustment will afford the pplicant the same privilege to remodel their homes as other properties in the vicinity. 4. The special circumstances of the subject property make the strict application of the standard an unnecessary hardship to the applicant, and the special circumstances are not the result of actions of the property owner or applicant. CONSISTENT The location of the existing home makes the strict application of the attached garage front setback an unnecessary hardship because the pplicant is seeking to utilize and improve the existing structure. The special circumstances are not the result of the pplicant actions, the home was built in The Major djustment will not injure or adversely impact legal conforming uses of adjacent property, or the applicant has accurately assessed the impacts of the proposed Major djustment and has agreed to mitigate those impacts. In making this determination, the oard of djustment shall begin with the assumption that variations from standards create impacts on adjacent properties and shall place the burden of proof on the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion for approval. Unsupported opinions of impacts from surrounding property owners shall not be conclusive evidence of impacts. CONSISTENT The requested Major djustment to the attached garage front setback will not negatively impact legal conforming uses adjacent to the property. Many of the properties in the vicinity were originally developed around the same time as the subject property (977) and are registered as legally nonconforming for their setbacks. dditionally, there is a slight change in grade and the edge of pavement of Thornburg Street is approximately 3 from the front property line and 3 away from the proposed garage. These conditions give the appearance of a greater setback from the public Right-Of-Way. 6. The Major djustment is the least modification possible of the standard that will afford relief to the pplicant. Page 3 of 4 3.3

52 Yahmonite dd to Steamboat Springs lock 5 Lots 3-4 (05 Thornburg Street); M-8- Report Date: November 8, 08 CONSISTENT The pplicant is seeking the requested Major djustment to expand the existing one garage to a two car garage. The garage is of a reasonable, standard size. The proposed djustment is the least modification possible to the front setback standard in order to make a one car garage into a two car garage. 7. When considering the amount of variation requested, any existing nonconformity will be considered part of the overall Major djustment request. For example, an existing nonconforming structure encroaches five feet into the required setback, and the applicant is requesting a Major djustment to encroach an additional five feet. The Major djustment request shall be for a ten-foot encroachment into the required setback. NOT PPLICLE ll nonconformities on the site have been previously permitted. The subject property has a legal conforming status. 8. The Major djustment is consistent with the purpose and intent of this CDC, the Community Plan, and other adopted plans, as applicable. CONSISTENT The request to reduce the front attached garage setback from 5 to 9 is consistent with the purpose of the Major djustment process to allow for variations to certain standards. 9. Waterbody setback adjustments shall also comply with the additional criteria for approval for waterbody setback adjustments in Section 78.H. NOT PPLICLE Staff Findings Staff finds that the Major djustment, M-8- for a 9 adjusted attached garage front setback, is CONSISTENT with the Criteria for pproval for a Major djustment. Recommended Motion oard of djustment approves M-8-, a Major djustment application for a 9 adjusted attached garage front setback at 05 Thornburg Street. ttachments ttachment Project Timeline ttachment pplicant Narrative ttachment 3 Plan Set Page 4 of 4 3.4

53 ttachment Project Timeline Project Code: M 8 Project Name: Yahmonite ddition to Steamboat Springs lock 5 Lots 3 4 (05 Thornburg Street) DTES Pre-Submittal Meeting 09/0/08 pplication Submitted 09/7/08 NOTES TECHNICL DVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW TC Letter 0/3/08 Scheduled for hearing & minor Resubmittal 0/9/08 PULIC NOTICE Newspaper Notice /04/08 Mailed Notice /0/08 Property Posting /0/08 PULIC HERINGS oard of djustment /5/08 comments NOTES 3.5

54 ttachment September 0, 08 Subject Property: 05 Thornburg St RE: Requesting a 9 0 Front Setback with RN- Zone District 78.D Major djustment pproval Criteria Narrative.c Nonconformities on lot are legal non-conforming structures. Currently, the existing one car garage is 6-0 out of conformance within the 5-0 attached garage front setback requirement of zone district RN-. The Major djustment does not constitute special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and applicable zone district. Of the 6 neighboring properties on Thornburg Street which are all in RN- Zone District, not a single built property conforms to the required 5-0 Setback. In fact, 4 of the neighboring properties would conform to the requested 9-0 Major adjustment setback and the additional properties exceed the requested setback. 3. The Major djustment is necessary due to the special circumstance relating to the topography of the subject property. 05 Thornburg Street was originally constructed prior to the current zoning revaluations and a parking pad for future a remodel was laid out to accommodate an attached two car garage. s can be seen in the accompanying graphics, the neighboring properties have had the opportunity to construct their attached two car garages within the RN- s 5-0 setback. The narrative is flipped here, where the subject property isn t allowed the same privileges permitted to the other properties in the vicinity in the applicable zone district. 4. The current owners didn t construct the property under the new RN- zoning district requirements, and are therefore not the authors of the current hardship. 5. s stated above, not a single property on the Thornburg Street conforms to the 5-0 setback requirement per zone district RN-, therefore a granted Major djustment would not adversely impact legal conforming uses of adjoining properties. Otherwise stated, adjoining properties are the basis for the requested 9-0 front setback and are impacting the Subject Property adversely. 6. The djustment proposed is the least modification possible of the standard that will afford relief to the applicant as the proposed solution allows the applicant to use the majority of their existing structure to construct a two-car garage. However, by adhering to the current RN- garage setback requirements, the subject property would have to construct a new structure to achieve the same end. This is a less efficient use of the site, would ultimately result in overhead doors that are facing the ROW, rather than the side load solution proposed. The amount requested is the minimum width needed to achieve a workable car garage width. 7. The applicant is requesting a 6-0 encroachment into front setback. Currently, the existing structure encroaches 6-0 into the setback. 8. The Major djustment is consistent with the purpose of the CDC and the Steamboat springs Community rea plan. The solution proposed is in conformance with all engineering standards, and affords good snow storage, and efficient use of the site. It maintains human scaled residential character with 3.6

55 broken down forms consistent with the context of the neighborhood, pits the overhead doors perpendicular to the ROW rather than facing front and center. 9. Waterbody setbacks are not applicable on this lot. 3.7

56 ttachment 3 rchitecture Planning Interiors Use this table for the following projects types: Conceptual Development Plan, Development Plan, Minor Modification, Floodplain Development Permit, Major djustment, or Minor djustment. Use this table for the following projects types: Preliminary Plat or Final Plat. Project Summary Table Gross Floor rea 3,806 SQ. FT. Gross Site rea Net Floor rea,957 SQ. FT. % of Site rea in ROW Unit Size,957 SQ. FT. Number of Lots Number of Units Standards Zoning (existing and proposed) RN- Frontage N/ ccessory Use(s) N/ Standards Lot rea Updated 7/08 KELLY & STONE RCHITECTS STEMOT SPRINGS, C0 TRUCKEE, C RESIDENCE Zone District Requirements 5,003 SQ. FT. VILLGE LN. verage Lot Size Lot Width Square Footage,957 SQ. FT. # of Units Lot Coverage N/ N/ Proposed Variance? (Y/N) 5,003 SQ. FT. Lot Length Usable Lot rea verage Slope. ST MERITT ST. THE LVD. lock Lengths N Individual Lot Frontage Lot Coverage 35% MX. (6% CTUL) N Project Frontage Floor rea Ratio NO MX. N/ N Open Space Square Footage Overall uilding Height 40'-0" 3'-0" N verage Plate Height 8'-0" 5'-6" N Frontage rea Height N/ N/ N Front Setback 5'-0" 9'-0" Side Setback 0'-0" 0'-0" N Upper Story Setback N/ N/ N Rear Setback 0'-0" N/ N Second Story Intensity N/ N/ N Parking N/ N/ N Snow Storage N/ N/ N YES H T Department of Planning & Community Development P.O. ox , Steamboat Springs, CO (970) COVER SHEET SURVEY (EXISTING CONDITIONS- SUJECT PROPERTY & DJCENT PRCEL). O MJOR DJUSTMENT REQUEST. LOWER LEVEL PLN. MIN LEVEL PLN.3 ROOF PLN 3. ELEVTIONS 3. ELEVTIONS 4. UILDING SECTIONS 4. UILDING SECTIONS 4.3 UILDING SECTIONS Principal Use Variance? (Y/N) PHWINTH ST. SHEET INDEX: Description Proposed ISSUE: ST. Use reakdown Zone District Requirements 8T H CONSULTNT: KELLY & STONE RCHITECTS PO OX 88389, STEMOT SPRINGS, CO CONTCT: TOM DVIS, (970) EXT. 309, TOMD@KSRCH.COM Project Summary Table ST. PPLICNT & OWNER: WES & SHEIL FOUNTIN 05 THORNURG ST., STEMOT SPRINGS, CO. CONTCT: WES FOUNTIN, (970) , WES@ZIRKEL.US 05 THORNURG ST. STEMOT SPRINGS, CO Subdivision Project Summary Table LSO KNOWN S LOTS 3 & 4, LOCK 5, OF YHMONITE DDITION TO STEMOT SPRINGS Land Use & Site Development Project Summary Table 9T H IM Server: STEMOT IM9 - IM Server 9/83_FOUNTIN/FOUNTIN REMODEL Friday, October 6, 08 5:03 PM FOR MJOR DJUSTMENT REQUEST Kelly & Stone rchitects, Inc. DTE: EXISTING RESIDENCE REMODEL CONCEPT REMODEL CONCEPT MJOR DJUSTMENT REQUEST PROJECT NUMER: 83 SHEET TITLE: COVER SHEET MJOR DJUSTMENT REQUEST SHEET NUMER: FOR 0. LOTS 3 & 4, LOCK 5, OF YHMONITE DDITION TO STEMOT SPRINGS LSO KNOWN S 05 THORNURG ST. STEMOT SPRINGS, CO C COPYRIGHT KS a INC. PLESE RECYCLE 3.8

57 rchitecture Planning Interiors Kelly & Stone rchitects, Inc. IM Server: STEMOT IM9 - IM Server 9/83_FOUNTIN/FOUNTIN REMODEL Monday, September 4, 08 4:50 PM MJOR DJUSTMENT REQUEST FOR LOTS 3 & 4, LOCK 5, OF YHMONITE DDITION TO STEMOT SPRINGS LSO KNOWN S 05 THORNURG ST. STEMOT SPRINGS, CO ISSUE: PROJECT NUMER: SHEET TITLE: Layout SHEET NUMER: C COPYRIGHT KS a INC. PLESE RECYCLE DTE: EXISTING RESIDENCE REMODEL CONCEPT REMODEL CONCEPT MJOR DJUSTMENT REQUEST

58 3 F E G 4 D 78. pplicability Major djustment approval is required for the following development activities and types of variations or modifications to standards in this CDC: Depth rea Duplex C 0 min. 0 min. 0 min. 30 min. no max. no min. 8,000 sf min. no max. 6,000 sf min. D E 8 max. 6 max. F G 6 35% max. no max. 0% max. 7 max. max. The above graphics are not intended to illustrate how building height, lot width, or lot depth is measured. Refer to Section 80 for rules of measurement. Manufactured homes are prohibited. 8 Purpose & dministration Variations of sign standards specified in rticle The Major djustment is consistent with the purpose and intent of this CDC, the Community Plan, and other adopted plans, as applicable. 5. Development of a legal nonconforming lot when the criteria of Section 05.C are not met lteration or modification of a legal nonconforming structure or a conforming structure housing a nonconforming use when the proposed alteration or modification does not comply with the applicable dimensional standards of the zone district. Waterbody setback adjustments shall also comply with the additional criteria for approval for waterbody setback adjustments in Section 78.H.. REQUESTED DDITIONL 0'-0 DJUSTMENT TO EXISTING NON ICT CONFORMNCE- TOTL OF 6'-0 NON CONFORMNCE TO ZONE DISTR SETCK STNDRDS- (REQUESTING 9'-0" FRONT SETCK) Signs 7-30 Variations of numerical dimensional and development standards specified in rticle and rticle 4, that do not meet the applicability of a Minor djustment, for single-family dwellings and duplexes. Variations of duplex design standards in rticle E Procedures. Review shall be prior to building permit, Sign Permit, or Floodplain Development Permit review, as applicable.. Every property is unique, so evidence that a Major djustment was previously granted under similar circumstances shall not be considered binding grounds for granting a Major djustment. 78.D General Criteria for pproval The following general criteria for approval shall apply to all Major djustment applications that are not reviewed in accordance with any of the alternative criteria for approval in Section 78.E and Section 78.F. When these general criteria for approval are applicable, Major djustments may be approved upon a finding that the following criteria are met:. a. The property is in full compliance with all requirements of the applicable zone district; or b. The lot is a legal nonconforming lot; or c. ny nonconformities on the lot are legal nonconforming structures or uses.. The Major djustment will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and applicable zoning district. 3. The Major djustment is necessary due to special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject property and to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the applicable zone district. Community Development Code Steamboat Springs Municipal Code Chapter 6 i rchitecture Planning Interiors Kelly & Stone rchitects, Inc. lternative Criteria for pproval for Historic Structures The following criteria for approval shall apply to Major djustment applications for the restoration, modification, or expansion of an historic building or structure. When these alternative criteria for approval are applicable, Major djustments may be approved upon a finding that the following criteria are met, as applicable:.. The property and the use of such property for which the Major djustment is requested meets one of the following: CDC Supp. 6- LIMITS OF SPEN When considering the amount of variation requested, any existing nonconformity will be considered part of the overall Major djustment request. For example, an existing nonconforming structure encroaches five feet into the required setback, and the applicant is requesting a Major djustment to encroach an additional five feet. The Major djustment request shall be for a ten-foot encroachment into the required setback. Variations to Floodplain Development Permit requirements and standards specified in rticle 4. Subdivision Standards F G The Major djustment is the least modification possible of the standard that will afford relief to the applicant Development Process 0 min. 0 min. 0 min. 40 max. 8 max. i WTER SERVICE Restorations or Rehabilitations Major djustments for restorations or rehabilitations shall meet the following criteria: a. The restoration or rehabilitation relates to and is reasonably necessary to permit the restoration or rehabilitation of a previous condition of historical significance or historic period of significance to the building. b. The Major djustment shall not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and applicable zoning district. Modifications or Expansions Major djustments for modifications or expansions shall meet the following criteria: a. The modification or expansion has been designed to preserve the historic characterdefining elements of the building. b. The Major djustment is the minimum necessary to fulfill the purpose and the need of the applicant. c. The Major djustment shall not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and applicable zoning district. i ET 6'-0" OUT OF CONFORMNCE EXISTING NON-CONFORMNCE SUJECT PROPERTY 5'-0 TTCHED GRGE SETCK PER ZONE DISTRICT RN- GS METER EXISTING STRUCTURE,738 GROSS SQ. FT. LOT- 5,003 SQ. FT '-0" 6 FR T CK SUJECT PROPERTY CONFORM TO REQUIRED 5 FOOT FRONT SETCK PER RN- ZONE DISTRICT CONFORM TO REQUESTED 9 FOOT FRONT SETCK MJOR DJUSTEMNT FOR TTCHED GRGE DDITIONL PROPOSED068 GROSS SQ. FT. TOTL PROPOSED - 3,806 GROSS SQ. FT. 0'-0" SIDE SETCK 0'-0" SIDE SETCK IM Server: STEMOT IM9 - IM Server 9/83_FOUNTIN/FOUNTIN REMODEL Monday, September 4, 08 4:50 PM ELECTRIC METER. 9 TED UES Q E R SE ONT LIMITS OF SPEN UPON GRNTING OF MJOR DJUSTMENT EXCEED REQUESTED 9 FOOT FRONT SETCK MJOR DJUSTEMNT FOR TTCHED GRGE REQUESTED 9 FOOT FRONT SETCK MJOR DJUSTEMNT FOR TTCHED GRGE REQUIRED 5 FOOT FRONT SETCK PER RN- ZONE DISTRICT FOR CTV ET MJOR DJUSTMENT REQUEST OUTLINE OF PROPOSED CR GRGE Rules & Definitions LIMITS OF SPEN 0 min. 5 min. 5 min. uilding Form uilding Height Principal uilding Overall Height verage Plate Height ccessory uilding Overall Height verage Plate Height Other Standards uilding Intensity Lot Coverage Floor rea Ratio Total ccessory uilding Density Dwelling Units per Lot Principal Uses per Lot The Major djustment will not injure or adversely impact legal conforming uses of adjacent property, or the applicant has accurately assessed the impacts of the proposed Major djustment and has agreed to mitigate those impacts. In making this determination, the oard of djustment shall begin with the assumption that variations from standards create impacts on adjacent properties and shall place the burden of proof on the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion for approval. Unsupported opinions of impacts from surrounding property owners shall not be conclusive evidence of impacts.. 78.C uilding Placement Lot Line Setbacks Front Principal uilding ttached Garage ccessory uilding Side Principal uilding ttached Garage ccessory uilding Rear Principal uilding ttached Garage ccessory uilding Lot Size Width 5. Purpose The purpose of the Major djustment process is to allow for variations to certain standards in this CDC and to allow for limited development of nonconforming lots and alteration of nonconforming structures and structures housing nonconforming uses. 05 THORNURG ST. STEMOT SPRINGS, CO C 78. The special circumstances of the subject property make the strict application of the standard an unnecessary hardship to the applicant, and the special circumstances are not the result of actions of the property owner or applicant. LSO KNOWN S 05. Dimensional Standards (See below.) 78 MJOR DJUSTMENT 4. LOTS 3 & 4, LOCK 5, OF YHMONITE DDITION TO STEMOT SPRINGS THORNURG STREET Purpose The Residential Neighborhood zone districts are intended to provide areas for one-family and twofamily residential uses in a neighborhood setting, as well as limited nonresidential uses that are complimentary to and compatible with a one-family and two-family residential neighborhood. Zone Districts 05. to a Minor djustment shall be approved that will result in a total variation that exceeds the applicability of a Minor djustment. Use Definitions & Standards 77.F Development & Design Standards RN- LIMITS OF SPEN ROOF OVERHNG ISSUE:. SUJECT PROPERTY. DTE: EXISTING RESIDENCE REMODEL CONCEPT REMODEL CONCEPT MJOR DJUSTMENT REQUEST PROJECT NUMER: 83 SHEET TITLE: O MJOR DJUSTMENT REQUEST SHEET NUMER: 0'-0" SIDE SETCK. TP IMPORTED - SITE PLN SCLE: /8" = '-0" 0 4' 8' 6' C COPYRIGHT KS a INC. PLESE RECYCLE 3.0