PROPOSED AGENDA CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON SEPTEMBER 26, BUNO ROAD 7:00 P.M. BRIGHTON, MI (810)

Transcription

1 PROPOSED AGENDA CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING 4363 BUNO ROAD 7:00 P.M. BRIGHTON, MI (810) A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. CALL TO THE PUBLIC E. AGENDA F. MINUTES 1. AUGUST 22, 2018 REGULAR MEETING G. BUSINESS 1. ZBA APPLICATION#: 18/17; LOCATION: 8554 MCCLEMENTS; TAX ID#: ; OWNER AND APPLICANT: JON LUOMA; ZONING: RC (RESIDENTIAL COUNTRY) a. Accessory Structure in Front Yard, a variance from Article 3, Sec. 3-04(c) of the Zoning Ordinance b. Front Yard Setback, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance c. Side Yard Setback, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance H. REPORTS AND CORRESPONDENCE I. CALL TO THE PUBLIC J. ADJOURNMENT The Charter Township of Brighton will provide the necessary reasonable auxiliary aids and services, such as signers for the hearing impaired and audiotapes of printed materials being considered at the meeting to individuals with disabilities at the meeting upon 10 days notice to the Charter Township of Brighton, Attn: Township Manager. Individuals should contact the Charter Township of Brighton by writing or contacting the following: Kelly Mathews, 4363 Buno Road, Brighton, MI Telephone: or at planner@brightontwp.com.

2 MEMORANDUM TO: BRIGHTON TOWNSHIP RESIDENTS FROM: ANN M. BOLLIN, CLERK SUBJECT: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ELECTRONIC PACKETS DATE: MAY 6, 2016 Packets for the Brighton Township Zoning Board of Appeals meetings posted to the website contain scanned original documents. These electronic packets are subject to change based on meeting material presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals throughout the course of the meeting. For a complete original packet following the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting contact the Clerk s Office at or via clerk@brightontwp.com

3 PROPOSED MINUTES CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON AUGUST 22, 2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REGULAR MEETING 4363 BUNO ROAD 7:00 P.M. BRIGHTON, MI (810) Chairperson F. Grapentien called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. Present: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, J. Stinedurf, C. Moran (alt.), F. Grapentien, J. Cogley, S. Theis, A. Lutes (alt.) Absent: J. McKeon CALL TO THE PUBLIC None. AGENDA J. Stinedurf moved and J. Dorset seconded to approve the agenda as presented. Ayes: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, J. Stinedurf, C. Moran (alt.), F. Grapentien, J. Cogley Nays: None Motion carried. MINUTES J. Stinedurf moved and J. Cogley seconded to approve the July 25, 2018 regular meeting minutes with the change as presented. Ayes: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, J. Stinedurf, C. Moran (alt.), F. Grapentien, J. Cogley Nays: None Motion carried. S. Theis arrived at 7:07P.M. ZBA APPLICATION # 18/14; LOCATION: HYNE; TAX ID # ; OWNER AND APPLICANT: KIMBERLY AND BURKE DAVIS; ZONING: RC (RESIDENTIAL COUNTRY) a. Accessory Structure in Front Yard, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicant Burke Davis explained that he would like to construct an accessory structure in front of the home; due to the placement of the home far back on the property in the 1970's, he cannot build behind it, nor to the side of the property because it's wet, so he needs to build. K. Mathews reviewed her report dated July 24, PUBLIC HEARING The public hearing opened at 7:10 p.m. None. The public hearing closed at 7:10 p.m. J. Cogley moved and S. Theis seconded to approve the variance request, Accessory Structure in Front Yard, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance for ZBA Application # 18/14; Location: Hyne; Tax ID # ; Owner and Applicant: Burke Davis for the following reasons: the uniqueness of the property, topography, the distance from other properties, it's not self-created, and the Placement of the house. Ayes: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, C. Moran (alt.), J. Stinedurf, F. Grapentien, J. Cogley, S. Theis Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA APPLICATION # 18/13; LOCATION: 8266 WOODLAND SHORE DR.; TAX ID # ; OWNER: MORRIS REVOCABLE TRUST; APPLICANT: SPENCER & SONS CONSTRUCTION; ZONING: R-5 (WATERFRONT RESIDENTIAL) Page 1 of 5 Charter Township of Brighton - ZBA Minutes - August 22, 2018 Regular Meeting Approved -

4 a. Non-Conforming Building and Use, a variance from Article 21, Sec.'s and 04 of the Zoning Ordinance. b. Side Yard Setback, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance. c. Lot Coverage, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicant Michael Morris and Applicant Representative, John Spencer, Spencer & Sons Construction, were in attendance and summarized their request to construct an attached garage and deck onto the property which is small for the district and is non-conforming since the current home is located too close to the lot line on the south side. The existing garage is non-usable and currently there is not a deck attached to the home. The applicant discussed the proposed project with the three (3) closest neighbors on both sides and received signatures from four (4) of the six (6). John Spencer, Spencer & Sons, discussed in detail the specific setback on the east side of the property and the fact that the lot is angled so the distance gets smaller from the lake to the road. Additionally, with the small lot, it is difficult to achieve twenty-five (25%) percent lot coverage. K. Mathews reviewed her report dated July 24, PUBLIC HEARING The public hearing opened at 7:20 p.m. Doug Mancini, 3441 Hilton Bay Ct. - Improving house and lake; support. The public hearing closed at 7:22 p.m. J. Dorset moved and J. Stinedurf seconded to approve the variance request, Non-Conforming Building and Use, a variance from Article 21, Sec.'s and 04 of the Zoning Ordinance for ZBA Application #18/13; Location: 8266 Woodland Shore Drive; Owner: Morris Revocable Trust; Applicant: Spencer & Sons Construction; Zoning: R-5 (Waterfront Residential) to allow a deck and attached garage to be added to a non-conforming building for the following reasons: the home was built in 1956 and pre-dated the Zoning Ordinance so in order to allow any additions to the home, since the home is located only 2.5 ft. from the east lot line, rather than the five (5) ft. required, this variance is required. Ayes: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, C. Moran (alt.), J. Stinedurf, F. Grapentien, J. Cogley, S. Theis Nays: None Motion carried. J. Dorset moved and J. Stinedurf seconded to approve the variance requests for a side setback of 1.7 ft. from the required five (5) ft. and lot coverage of 31% from the required 25% from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance for ZBA Application #18/13; Location: 8266 Woodland Shore Drive; Owner: Morris Revocable Trust; Applicant: Spencer & Sons Construction; Zoning: R-5 (Waterfront Residential) for the following reasons: the variance requests will do the owner and neighbors substantial justice; will not interfere with other property owners in the area; extraordinary circumstance of the size of the lot; and is not impacting future development of lots in the area. Ayes: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, C. Moran (alt.), F. Grapentien, J. Cogley, J. Stinedurf, S. Theis Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA APPLICATION # 18/15; LOCATION: HYNE; TAX ID # ; OWNER AND APPLICANT: JOSEPH BALHORN; ZONING: RC (RESIDENTIAL COUNTRY) a. Lot Coverage, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicant Joseph Balhorn was in attendance. He discussed his variance request to add a detached garage and covered porch and future pool which increases his lot coverage from five (5%) percent to nine (9%) percent. The property is two (2) acres in a 2.5-acre area. Planner K. Mathews reviewed her report dated July 27, PUBLIC HEARING The public hearing opened at 7:35 p.m. None. The public hearing closed at 7:35 p.m. There was a question regarding whether the driveway was planned to the rear of the property for the detached structure. Page 2 of 5 Charter Township of Brighton - ZBA Minutes - August 22, 2018 Regular Meeting Approved -

5 J. Cogley moved and S. Theis seconded to approve the variance request, lot coverage of 9%, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance for ZBA Application # 18/15; Location: Hyne; Tax 11) # ; Owner and Applicant: Joseph Balhorn for the following reasons: the uniqueness of the lot i.e. there is farm land to the east, west, and south, the size of the lot v. what is allowable in the district, there aren't too many small lots in the area, and no neighbor concerns. Ayes: J. Dorset, C. Moran (alt.), F. Grapentien, J. Gibbons, J. Cogley, S. Theis Nayes: J. Stinedurf Motion carried. ZBA APPLICATION # 18/16; LOCATION: 9956 E. GRAND RIVER; TAX ID # ; OWNER: BRIGHTON VICTOR LLC; APPLICANT: INTERCITY NEON; ZONING: B-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS) a. Specific Sign Regulations, variances from Article 17, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance (height and square footage). It was discussed that there were a few minor typos on the application. The Applicant Representative from Intercity Neon explained that DFCU has a brand image for their signage, and in order to achieve the image they desire, they need variances to allow a larger and taller sign. Specifically, a 47.7 sq. ft., 6.9 ft. high sign v. the allowable thirtytwo (32) sq. ft., forty-two (42) inch high sign is requested. K. Mathews reviewed her report dated July 30, PUBLIC HEARING The public hearing opened at 7:45 p.m. None. The public hearing closed at 7:45 p.m. F. Grapentien moved and S. Theis seconded to table the variance request, Sign Regulations, variances from Article 17, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance (height and square footage) for ZBA Application # 18/16; Location: 9956 E. Grand River; Tax ID # ; Owner: Brighton Victor LLC; Applicant: Intercity Neon. Ayes: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, C. Moran (alt.), S. Theis, F. Grapentien, J. Cogley, J. Stinedurf Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA APPLICATION # 18/07; LOCATION: LANGDON DR. AND WALSH; TAX ID #'s and 085; OWNER AND APPLICANT: JOHN AND JENNIFER CONELY; ZONING: R-4 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY) a. Front Yard Setback, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance. b. Lot Coverage, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance. Applicant Representative Dave LeClair, Livingston Engineering, overviewed the request to take (2) lots and split them back to their original platted lots which would make eight (8) lots. In order to have desirable lots, the two (2) corner lots on Walsh and Loch Lomond and Langdon and Loch Lomond, are requested to have a five (5) setback on Loch Lomond, instead of the required twenty-five (25) ft. Since the lots will be small, in order to build reasonably sized homes on the lots, the lot coverage proposed is forty-two (42%) percent instead of the required twenty-five (25%) percent. Mr. LeClair stated that the area was platted in 1929 and there are many lots and homes similar to what they are proposing for the area. He stated the two (2) existing duplexes would be demolished. It was discussed that sewer may be extended from Old 23 to the properties. K. Mathews reviewed her report dated June 4, The public hearing opened at 8:10 p.m. James Boisvert, 5029 Langdon - Most of the area are double lots; some are single; want improvements in the area; four homes would be acceptable, not eight. Chris VanCamp, 5022 Langdon - He lives on a single lot with a 1400 sq. home and attached garage; he doesn't know how you can fit homes on the small lots; four homes v. eight homes would be acceptable. Justin Packman, 5065 Langdon - Been in the area for one year, want increased value and profit from home; this will decrease value. Dawn Boisvert, 5029 Langdon - There's a junk yard in this area; this proposal isn't helping them; they fix their own roads since they're private - increased traffic on Loch Lomond. Page 3 of 5 Charter Township o fbrighton - ZBA Minutes - August 22, 2018 Regular Meeting Approved -

6 Felicia Barone, 4911 Langdon - She's across from junk yard; not eight homes; doesn't agree. It was stated that Joe Boggs, 4985 Langdon; Mike Jernigan, 4961 Langdon; and another property owner had attended the last two meetings when the matter was postponed but weren't able to come tonight but they are opposed. James Boisvert, 5029 Langdon - Don't know what the plans are for the homes - rental, owner-occupied? The public hearing closed at 8:20 p.m. S. Theis stated that he was friends with Mr. Conely so he recused himself from voting on the matter. Allan Lutes, ZBA alternate, was in the audience so he stepped in for Mr. Theis. J. Cogley moved and J. Gibbons seconded to approve the variance request, Front Yard setback, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a five (5) ft. v. twenty-five (25) ft. setback from Loch Lomond for ZBA Application # 18/07; Location: Langdon Drive and Walsh; Tax ID #'s and 085; Owner and Applicant: John and Jennifer Conely. Ayes: None Nays: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, C. Moran (alt.), A. Lutes (alt.), F. Grapentien, J. Cogley, J. Stinedurf Motion failed. Applicant Representative Dave LeClair stated that the applicant would be amenable to allow a fifteen (15) ft. setback along Loch Lomond instead of the requested five (5) ft. Lutes moved and J. Stinedurf seconded to deny the variance request, Front Yard setback, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a five (5) ft. v. twenty-five (25) ft. setback from Loch Lomond for ZBA Application # 18/07; Location: Langdon Drive and Walsh; Tax ID #'s and 085; Owner and Applicant: John and Jennifer Conely for the following reasons. Compliance with the strict letter of the restrictions governing lot coverage and setbacks for the homes would not unreasonably prevent the use of the property. Granting of the requested variances would not do substantial justice to the applicant as well as to other property owners in the district and is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the same zoning district and vicinity of the subject parcel. The requested variances do substantially interfere with the public safety and welfare, increase the hazard of fire, impair the adequate supply of light and air, or create nuisances. The variances will interfere with or discourage the appropriate development, continued use, or value of adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. There are not exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that do not generally apply to other properties or uses. Ayes: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, C. Moran (alt.), A. Lutes (alt.), F. Grapentien, J. Cogley, J. Stinedurf Nays: None Motion carried. J. Dorset moved and J. Gibbons seconded to approve the variance request, Lot Coverage, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a forty-two (42%) percent lot coverage v. twenty-five (25%) percent lot coverage for ZBA Application # 18/07; Location: Langdon Drive and Walsh; Tax ID #'s and 085; Owner and Applicant: John and Jennifer Conely. Ayes: None Nays: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, C. Moran (alt.), A. Lutes (alt.), F. Grapentien, J. Cogley, J. Stinedurf Motion failed. Dorset moved and C. Moran seconded to deny the variance request, Lot Coverage, a variance from Article 3, Sec of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a forty-two (42%) percent lot coverage v. twenty-five (25%) percent lot coverage for ZBA Application # 18/07; Location: Langdon Drive and Walsh; Tax ID #'s and 085; Owner and Applicant: John and Jennifer Conely for the following reasons. Compliance with the strict letter of the restrictions governing lot coverage and setbacks for the homes would not unreasonably prevent the use of the property. Granting of the requested variances would not do substantial justice to the applicant as well as to other property owners in the district and is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in Page 4 of 5 Charter Township of Brighton - ZBA Minutes - August 22, 2018 Regular Meeting Approved-

7 the same zoning district and vicinity of the subject parcel. The requested variances do substantially interfere with the public safety and welfare, increase the hazard of fire, impair the adequate supply of light and air, or create nuisances. The variances will interfere with or discourage the appropriate development, continued use, or value of adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. There are not exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that do not generally apply to other properties or uses. Ayes: J. Gibbons, J. Dorset, C. Moran (alt.), A. Lutes (alt.), F. Grapentien, J. Cogley, J. Stinedurf Nays: None Motion carried. REPORTS AND CORRESPONDENCE J. Stinedurf - PC update: Kensington daycare. S. Theis - TB update: SAD's, sewer lawsuit. C. Moran - No Utilities Committee. CALL TO THE PUBLIC None. C. Moran moved and S. Theis seconded to adjourn. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Frank Grapentien, Chairperson John Gibbons, Secretary Kelly Mathews, Recording Secretary Ann M. Bollin, CMC, CMMC, Clerk Page 5 of 5 Charter Township of Brighton - ZBA Minutes - August 22, 2018 Regular Meeting Approved-

8 8554 McClements N A Feet Charter Township of Brighton

9 Date: August 27, 2018 To: From: Subject: Location: Request: Zoning: Zoning Board of Appeals Charter Township of Brighton Kelly Mathews Variance Requests 8554 McClements Accessory Structure in Front Yard, Front Yard & Side Yard Setbacks RC (Residential Country) Tax ID#: Applicant: Owner: Jon Luoma Jon Luoma Dear ZBA Members: The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) application submitted by Jon Luoma has been reviewed. The review is based upon the standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance and a review of the application materials. The following comments are offered for your review. The applicant is proposing a twenty-four (24) ft. by thirty (30) ft. (720 sq. ft.) detached structure in the front yard. The site has a 1,527 sq. ft. home, 420 sq. ft. attached garage, 402 sq. ft. deck, and a thirty-six (36) sq. ft. deck located on a 2.53 acre parcel in the RC zoning district. Detached structures are only allowed in the side or rear yard. Additionally, the structure requires front and side yard setbacks for its placement. VARIANCE REQUESTS Accessory Building (Article 3, Section 3-04(c)). The accessory structure is proposed in the front yard. Accessory buildings are required in the side or rear yard. Front Yard Setback (Article 3, Section 3-03). The RC zoning district requires a minimum of a sixty (60) ft. front yard setback. The applicant is requesting a minimum setback of twenty-nine (29) ft. which is a thirty-one (31) ft. variance request. Side Yard Setback (Article 3, Section 3-03). The RC zoning district requires a minimum of a forty (40) ft. setback. The applicant is requesting a minimum 2.5 ft. setback from the westerly lot line which is a 37.5 ft. variance request. STANDARDS FOR ZBA ACTION The ZBA should only grant a variance to the Zoning Ordinance when circumstances of practical difficulty, unnecessary hardship unique to a particular property, or extraordinary circumstances are present. Article 22, Section outlines a number of criteria

10 Charter Township of Brighton Luoma Variance Requests - Accessory Structure, Front & Side Yard Setbacks ZBA - September 26, 2018 Page 2 applicable to variances that the ZBA should review in order to determine the need for the requested. 1. Practical Difficulty/Substantial Justice. Compliance with the strict letter of the restrictions governing area, setbacks, frontage, height, bulk, density, or other dimensional provisions would unreasonably prevent the use of the property. Granting of the requested variance or appeal would do substantial justice to the applicant as well as to other property owners in the district and is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the same zoning district and vicinity of the subject parcel. In order to allow the construction of a new detached garage, a variance to allow it in the front yard is required. Due to topographic issues (wetlands), septic system, and power lines, the property owner is not able to place a structure in the side or rear yard. Additionally, due to the same, it has to be placed in the front and side yard setbacks. Compliance with the strict letter of the restrictions governing placement of an accessory structure would unreasonably prevent the use of the property. Granting of the requested variances would do substantial justice to the applicant as well as to other property owners in the district and is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in the same zoning district and vicinity of the subject parcel. 2. Public Safety and Welfare. The requested variance does not interfere with the public safety and welfare, increase the hazard of fire, impair the adequate supply of light and air, or create nuisances. The applicant would like to construct a detached garage in the front yard. The requested variances do not substantially interfere with the public safety and welfare, increase the hazard of fire, impair the adequate supply of light and air, or create nuisances. 3. Impact on Surrounding Neighborhood. The variance will not interfere with or discourage the appropriate development, continued use, or value of adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. The applicant would like to construct a detached garage in the front yard. The variances will not substantially interfere with or discourage the appropriate development, continued use, or value of adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. 4. Extraordinary Circumstances. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or the intended use that do not generally apply to other properties or uses. The need for the variance was not self-created by the applicant. The applicant would like to construct a detached garage in the front yard. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that do not generally apply to other properties or uses.

11 Charter Township of Brighton Luoma Variance Requests - Accessory Structure, Front & Side Yard Setbacks ZBA - September 26, 2018 Page 3 RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the variances as proposed are approved. Specifically, the following variances. Accessory Building (Article 3, Section 3-04(c)). The accessory structure is proposed in the front yard. Accessory buildings are required in the side or rear yard. Front Yard Setback (Article 3, Section 3-03). The RC zoning district requires a minimum of a sixty (60) ft. front yard setback. The applicant is requesting a minimum setback of twenty-nine (29) ft. which is a thirty-one (31) ft. variance request. Side Yard Setback (Article 3, Section 3-03). The RC zoning district requires a minimum of a forty (40) ft. setback. The applicant is requesting a minimum 2.5 ft. setback from the westerly lot line which is a 37.5 ft. variance request.

12 CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON [Ii 1'11LIJiI1LLI1HIIIIILWIIIlLLL11ll1L11L Buno Rd. Brighton, Michigan Telephone: (810) Fax: (810) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APPLICATION 1. Date Filed 3. ZBA Number 2. Meeting Date 5. Applicant Information 4. Fee Paid AUG N TWITMIP Name Jo /./ 1/0 ill A Address r55-44c. CLCrn6'r)1-5 City/State/Zip 6/2/KW7 ' A) if fy//q Phone Ele) 7 7 Z Fax op e ni 89 r7 Interest in the Property (e.g. fee simple, land option, etc. X Property Owner CI Other (Specify) 6. Current Property Owner Information Name Address City/State/Zip Phone Length of Ownership /, Fax 7. Location of Property for which the Variance is Requested Address CS- L1 (:,C,54.16" 1)7S 67,1,/c/v-rew ill 'ail zi Cross Streets tda e_ K. k5 ft- /14 e,(:' t,tc e A-ITS Tax I.D. # L7 i 7 ZOO Property Information Zoning District Area (Acreage) Current Use 7 S'g R6" 57", Width -ZOO FT Depth LL, -0 FT

13 Charter Township of Brighton Page 2 Zoning Board of Appeals Application 9. Variance Request Total Number of Variances Requested 3 Describe your Request 60A fq 7. To NU I 03 4 PO C (2o et.,e 3-1" ),) o /11/ y Section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance 3, o 3 / 10. Criteria for a Dimensional Variance Please respond to the following statements. The application must meet all criteria in order to obtain a variance. a. How would the strict compliance with the area, setbacks, frontage, height, bulk, density, or other non-use matters unreasonably prevent the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose or render the conformity unnecessarily burdensome? / CL- f36 6 -e= T77 ^J C /*I 44,6-3 'r 77 4, / F.- Co/1447M G n /1,16 5 PV-1-0 eitj6- pe5-6-5 y1,aj A.' 6G/7 h/ /14y C tzrzizer CA # 6 C. LC re_e;c7 C6' -r o. 3-i 0 (L6 Nez ss-s-a 75/ 1,5v, c Alz-cd-t6-Ayie t _ I 76M b. How would a variance do substantial justice to the applicant as well as to other property owners in the district? /v'4 G" 6/ 6-_ y /Ls. 7 Ajoo LI) LIkx 1264/1 A 11%3 s A46-7) A" V &LI co; A 57 Ai -6 5, ArCA 6 /1,4 P (-,e/.

14 Charter Township of Brighton Zoning Board of Appeals Application Page 3 c. Would a lesser variance than the requested give substantial relief to the applicant and or be more consistent with justice to other properties? If not, please explain why? /L6- is No 07W54-- PGA CfC C1N 7746 ifflepea--iy To,or C 7ZO,,Tc/ivc 77/ 5-7-A,4) CT t)(1,6, R ZS-74 / CTIO P, T2(IM-0 (z- UN r1,16 6A5-5- s7 6 t) OF 7 -riv6 n44.5-,v 7B'C 3-CV377C 5ȳrnivt P4.61,4SOri vek-.bfivc oiv -2714c 10( , /1A/4 77i6 5--an-4/ IS re) NA7212_060 /35-cAuS6 0F771( AM/L.5W, d. Have the special conditions and circumstances relating to the variance request resulted from the actions of the applicant? e. Is the variance requested the minimum amount necessary to overcome the inequality inherent in the particular property or mitigate the practical difficulty? f. Will Will the granting of the variance materially impair the intent and purpose of this ordinance?

15 Charter Township of Brighton Page 4 Zoning Board of Appeals Application 11. Criteria for a Use Variance Please respond to the following statements. The application must meet all criteria in order to obtain a variance. a. Can the site be reasonably used for any of the uses allowed within the current zoning designation? y55-, 7/i/S toiec Ale / 1=)/,',/ALCIS" 00 A N I/ RF A/ -7-7 Al_ b. Are there unique circumstances peculiar to the property and not generally applicable in the area to other properties in the same zoning district? Noi 7/v 64-C 4R-6" O 7 tzcs'ih cri-t7 C, P-Lti P 6A:77 G L1-A c-3 Gi (Z-6. S, c. Was the need for a variance self-created by either the applicant or the applicant's immediate predecessor? y6 f; TH WAS 56-LE- CfLCA-T A Fe/2 /15'7-H /c../vc-Ly focra571v6' 1-4,0tio FF/ CI 6 "cr

16 Charter Township of Brighton Page 5 Zoning Board of Appeals Application d. Will the capacity and operation of the infrastructure be significantly compromised? e. Will the granting of a use variance not alter the essential character of the neighborhood nor be a detriment to adjacent properties? Nd /5- LA)' LC- /36 / M06C,6 AtZ.6-4 NOT GA S N. 12. Criteria for Appeals and Interpretations The Zoning Board of Appeals is bound by the same rules, procedures, and standards of the Ordinance. The Zoning Board of Appeals should uphold the original decision unless the record clearly shows that the original decision body or official was one of the following: a. Arbitrary and capricious; or b. Filled to ensure consistency with ordinance standards; or c. Made an error, such as relying on false or inaccurate information, or d. Constituted an abuse of discretion; or e. Was based upon erroneous interpretation of the zoning ordinance or zoning law. Please describe how your appeal meets one of these criteria: /iv /36., Aic (ew,r , :PT /v/ Ti/ 6YZ4 ".^J4 4/C ,,46,14-11.c; pi 6 /5 ci 6,A 6 a;,)(--m0(,i---4, flc P2L1 F t.0 fy4/4-c Ivor 74/c<ro Cc-m.)5'M (4.4770") MY: c 44 A,H) 'R65-rtt.. (;170 fto_5-04_ /v6e Av cam Piyi(w7 5 0 TN F. 67)67A/ 6'6 4_57, sys-r6 AA

17 Charter Township of Brighton Page 6 Zoning Board of Appeals Application I, /./ X E C /V A (applicant), do hereby swear that the above statements are true. Z. co 1 /7.1 A (property owner), hereby give permission for the Charter Township of Brighton officials, staff, and consultants to go on the property for which the above referenced petition is proposed for purposes of verifying information provided on the submitted application. Sig ure of Applicant Date.--) Sig re of Property Owner Date Brighton Township Zoning Board of Appeals Action Approved/Denied Date Conditions of Approval

18

19 434"1 McCLEMENTS ROAD N ' C * s ern ir loam' TAX cone /E-07-2tX)-05/ 7:71=1"1"""1"1",',,Z.Z.7. `

20 62 ft 65 ft Measurements taken from center of the road. Power Lines

21 Virgin ground if drain field fails

22

23

24

25

26 SURROUNDING PROPERTIES McClemtits Rd. Meat:itrents Rd Mc` Clements Rd

27

28