Thomas JAC. Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam ; New York: North-Holland Pub. Co; 1976.

Transcription

1 LAWS5182 St Lucia View Online De Zulueta F, Gaius. The institutes of Gaius. Oxford: Clarendon Press; Plessis PJ du, Borkowski A. Borkowski s textbook on Roman law. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; /24

2 Jolowicz HF, Nicholas B. Historical introduction to the study of Roman law [Internet]. 3d ed. Cambridge [U.K.]: Cambridge University Press; Zimmermann R. The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta; Birks P, Krueger P, McLeod G, Justinian. Justinian s Institutes. London: Duckworth; Watson A, Justinian. The digest of Justinian: Volume 1 [Internet]. Rev. English language ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; Watson A, Justinian. The digest of Justinian: Volume 2 [Internet]. Rev. English language ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; Watson A, Justinian. The digest of Justinian: Volume 3 [Internet]. Rev. English language ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; Watson A, Justinian. The digest of Justinian: Volume 4 [Internet]. Rev. English language ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; /24

3 13. Blume FH. Annotated Justinian Code [Internet] Roman Law Resources [Internet] Du Plessis: Borkowski s Textbook on Roman Law 4e [Internet] Kolbert CF, Justinian. The digest of Roman law: theft, rapine, damage and insult. Harmondsworth: Penguin; Buckland WW. Elementary principles of the Roman private law [Internet]. Cambridge [Eng.]: University Press; al/elinicpapl0001&id=1&size=2&collection=beal&index=alpha/e_beal 18. Buckland WW. The main institutions of Roman private law [Internet]. Cambridge [England]: The University Press; al/minrpl0001&id=1&size=2&collection=beal&index=alpha/m_beal 19. 3/24

4 Stein P. Roman law in European history. New York: Cambridge University Press; Robinson OF, Fergus TD, Gordon WM. European legal history: sources and institutions. 3rd ed. London: Butterworths; 23. Wieaker F. Chapter 2: The Origins of European Legal Culture. In: A history of private law in Europe: with particular reference to Germany. Oxford: Clarendon Press; p Lee J. Confusio: Reference to Roman Law in the House of Lords and the Development of English Private Law [Internet]. Vol p Crook JA. Law and life of Rome [Internet]. Vol. Aspects of Greek and Roman life. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press; Johnston D. Roman law in context. Vol. Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; /24

5 27. Todd SC. Chapter 4: Sources of Law: Legal Sources. In: The shape of Athenian law. Oxford: Clarendon Press; p Gagarin M, Cohen D. The Cambridge companion to ancient Greek law [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Millett PC. Chapter 8: Sale, Credit and Exchange in Athenian Law and Society. In: Nomos: essays in Athenian law, politics and society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; p Thomas R. Written in Stone? Liberty, Equality, Orality and the Codification of Law. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. 1995;40(1): Jolowicz HF, Nicholas B. Historical introduction to the study of Roman law [Internet]. 3d ed. Cambridge [U.K.]: Cambridge University Press; /24

6 34. Johnston D. Roman law in context. Vol. Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; Potter DS. A companion to the Roman Empire [Internet]. Vol. Blackwell companions to the ancient world. Ancient history. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub; Harries J. Chapter 4: Roman Law Codes and the Roman Law Tradition. In: Beyond dogmatics: law and society in the Roman world. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; p Harries JD. How to Make a Law-Code. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. 1998;42(S71): Kelly JM. The Growth-Pattern of the Praetor s Edict. The Irish jurist. 1966;1: Honoré T. Chapter 1: The Emperor as Lawyer. In: Emperors and lawyers. London: Duckworth; p Stein P. The Two Schools of Jurists in the Early Roman Principate. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 1972;31(1): /24

7 41. Kelly JM. Chapter 7: Jurisprudence and the Law of the Jurists. In: An introduction to Roman legal and constitutional history. 2d ed., based on the sixth German edition of Romische Rechtsgeschichte. Oxford: Clarendon Press; p Heink PA. De regula iuris: Locus regit actum. [Internet] cus+regit+actum%22&source=gbs_navlinks_s 43. Honoré T. Ulpian: pioneer of human rights. 2nd ed. 2002; Honoré AM. Justinian s Digest: work in progress. Law quarterly review. 1972;88: Law quarterly review. 46. Rodger A. Review: Behind the Scenes of Roman Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [Internet]. 1983;3(3): Pugsley D. Some Reflections on the Compilation of Justinian s Digest. The Irish jurist. 1984;19: /24

8 Honoré T. Chapter 5: Temple of Justice: the Diges. In: Tribonian. London: Duckworth; p Biscardi A. Some critical remarks on the Roman law of Obligations. Scripta classica Israelica. 1978;4: Weir T. Contracts in Rome and England. Tulane law review [Internet]. 1992;66(6): p;collection=journals&id= Mayer-Maly T. Divisio Obligationum. The Irish jurist. 1967;2: Birks P. Chapter 1: Definition and division: a meditation on Institutes In: The classification of obligations. Oxford: Clarendon Press; p /24

9 56. Baker JH. Chapter 4: The Forms of Action. In: An introduction to English legal history. 4th ed. London: Butterworths LexisNexis; p Mason K. What is wrong with top-down legal reasoning? The Judicial Review [Internet]. 2004;7(1): Jensen D. Theories, principles, policies and common law adjudication. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy [Internet]. 2011;36(2011): ;res=IELAPA /24

10 62. Nicholas B. The Form of the Stipulation in Roman Law. Law Quarterly Review. 1953;69(2): /24

11 69. Palmirski T. Some Remarks on D and D pr [Internet] Available from: MacCormack G. Juristic Use of the Term Dolus: Contract. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte Romanistische Abteilung. 1983;100(1): De Zulueta F. Pages In: The Roman law of sale: introduction and select texts. Oxford: Clarendon Press; p /24

12 Daube D. Three Notes on Digest 18.1, Conclusion of Sale. Law Quarterly Review. 1957;73(3): Watson A. The Origins of Consensual Sale, A Hypothesis. Tijdschrift voor rechtsgeschiedenis [Internet]. 1964;32(2): amp;collection=journals&id= Daube D. Chapter 2: Certainty of Price. In: Studies in the Roman law of sale : dedicated to the memory of Francis de Zulueta. Oxford: Clarendon Press; p Bauman RA. The Interface of Greek and Roman Law: Contract, Delict and Crime. Revue internationale des droits de l antiquite [Internet]. 1996;43: Gordley J. Equality in Exchange. California Law Review. 1981;69(6): /24

13 Plessis PJ du, Ebooks Corporation. Letting and hiring in Roman legal thought [Internet]. Vol. Mnemosyne. Supplements. History and archaeology of classical antiquity. Leiden: BRILL; Plessis PJ Du. Subletting and the Roman Law of Letting and Hiring Interpreting C [Internet] p Daube D. Societas as Consensual Contract. The Cambridge Law Journal. 1938;6(03). 13/24

14 89. Watson A. The Notion of Equivalence of Contractual Obligation and Classical Roman Partnership. Law Quarterly Review. 1981;97(2): Watson A. Mandate and the Boundaries of Roman Contract. Bullettino dell Istituto di Diritto Romano Vittorio Scialoja. 1991;(33): /24

15 96. MacCormack G. Contractual Theory and the Innominate Contracts. Studia et documenta historiae et iuris. 1985;(51): MacMillan C. Mistakes in contract law [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; B html 99. Lawson FH. Error in Substantia. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1936;52(1): rnals/lqr52&size=2&collection=journals&id= Kennedy v. The Panama, New Zealand and Australian Royal Mail Company [Internet] Schrage EJH. Ius quaesitum tertio [Internet]. Vol. Comparative studies in Continental and Anglo-American legal history = Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur kontinentaleuropäischen und anglo-amerikanischen Rechtsgeschichte. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot; docid= /24

16 103. Watson A. The Definition of furtum and the Trichotomy. Tijdschrift voor rechtsgeschiedenis [Internet]. 1960;28(2): amp;collection=journals&id= Watson A. The Definition of furtum and the Trichotomy. Tijdschrift voor rechtsgeschiedenis [Internet]. 1960;28(2): amp;collection=journals&id= Buckland WW. Contrectatio. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1941;57(4): Available from: 16/24

17 ;collection=journals&id= Pugsley D. Contrectatio. The Irish jurist. 1980;15: MacCormack GD. Definitions: Furtum and Contrectatio. Acta Juridica [Internet]. 1977;2: amp;id=1&size=2&collection=journals&index=journals/actj 111. Lewis ADE, Ibbetson DJ. The Roman law tradition [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; /24

18 Birks PBH. The Early History of Iniuria. The Legal History Review. 1969;37(2): Watson A. Personal Injuries in the Xii Tables. The Legal History Review. 1975;43(2): Halpin AKW. The usage of inuria in the XII Tables. The Irish jurist [Internet]. 1976;11(2): /24

19 Watson A. Contract of mandate in Roman law. Aalen: Scientia Verlag; Birks P, Burrows A, Rodger of Earlsferry A. Mapping the law: essays in memory of Peter Birks [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Paschalidis P. What did iniuria in the lex Aquilia actually mean. Revue internationale des droits de l antiquite revue [Internet]. 2008; Kelly JM. Meaning of the Lex Aquilia. Law quarterly review. 1964;80(1): Honoré AM. Linguistic and Social Context of the Lex Aquilia. Irish Jurist. 1972;7: /24

20 129. Jolowicz HF. The Original Scope of the Lex Aquilia. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1922;38(4): ;collection=journals&id= Daube D. On the Third Chapter of the Lex Aquilia. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 1936;52(2): ;collection=journals&id= Sirks B. The delictual origin, penal nature and reipersecutory object of the actio damni iniuriae legis Aquiliae. Tijdschrift voor rechtsgeschiedenis. 2009;77(3-4): Gordon WM. Dating the Lex Aquilia. Acta juridica (Cape Town) [Internet]. 1976; amp;div=29&start_page=315&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0& men_tab=srchresults 133. Andrews NH. "Occidere and the Lex Aquilia. The Cambridge Law Journal. 1987;46(2): McCusker D. Liability For Omission Under The Lex Aquilia. Northern Ireland legal quarterly [Internet]. 1999;50(3): p;collection=journals&id= /24

21 MacCormack G. On the Third Chapter of the Lex Aquilia. Irish Jurist. 1970;5: Birks PBH. Negotiorum Gestio and the Common Law. Current Legal Problems [Internet]. 1971;24(1): =57d c24-418f-8a62-b /24

22 University College. The Irish jurist Zimmermann R. Pages In: The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta; p Mitchell C, Mitchell P. Landmark cases in the law of restitution [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Pub; B html 145. Birks PBH. English and Roman Learning in Moses v. Macferlan. Current Legal Problems [Internet]. 1984;37(1): Birks P, McLeod G. The Implied Contract Theory of Quasi-Contract: Civilian Opinion Current in the Century before Blackstone. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [Internet]. 1986;6(1): /24

23 Birks PBH. The Problem of Quasi-Delict. Current Legal Problems [Internet]. 1969;22(1): =f9cd6ed8-b9ae ec-90cd3e9afd Bogen DS. Ignoring History: The Liability of Ships Masters, Innkeepers and Stablekeepers under Roman Law. The American Journal of Legal History [Internet]. 1992;36(3): Click=true&searchText=Ignoring&searchText=History:&searchText=The&a mp;searchtext=liability&searchtext=of&searchtext=shipmasters,&searc htext=innkeepers&searchtext=and&searchtext=stablekeepers&searchte xt=under&searchtext=roman&searchtext=law&searchuri=%2faction%2 FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DIgnoring%2BHistory%253A%2BThe%2BLiability%2Bof%2BSh ipmasters%252c%2binnkeepers%2band%2bstablekeepers%2bunder%2broman%2blaw %26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A %252Fj100062&seq=1#page_scan_tab_cont ents 152. Birks PBH. A New Argument for a Narrow View of Litem Suam Facere. The Legal History Review. 1984;52(4): Pugsley DF. Litem Suam Facere. The Irish jurist. 1969;4: MacComick DN. Iudex Qui Litem Suam Fecit. Acta juridica (Cape Town) [Internet]. 1977; amp;id=1&size=2&collection=journals&index=journals/actj 23/24

24 155. Melbourne University Law Review Association. Australian guide to legal citation [Internet]. 3rd ed. Melbourne: Melbourne University Law Review Association in collaboration with Melbourne Journal of International Law; data/assets/pdf_file/0007/ /finalonlinepdf-2012reprin t.pdf 156. Past Central Exam Papers [Internet]. 24/24