AGENDA. 3. PC 15-02: Preliminary Plat of Hawk Hollow Addition (Shawn Christ, Land Development Manager)

Transcription

1 City of Moline PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, March 25, :00 p.m. Council Chambers, th Street AGENDA 1. Call to order 2. Approval of minutes January 28, PC 15-02: Preliminary Plat of Hawk Hollow Addition (Shawn Christ, Land Development Manager) 4. Consideration: PC Review upcoming meetings 6. Other business 7. Adjournment Any person with disabilities who wishes to attend the meeting who requires a special accommodation or any other person requiring a special accommodation in attending the meeting should notify Holly K. Jackson, Department of Planning & Development,

2 GENERAL INFORMATION STAFF REPORT Department of Planning and Development PC March 20, 2015 Owner/Applicant: Requested Action: Location: Size of Tract: Existing Land Use: Existing Zoning: Surrounding Land Uses: City of Moline Approve Preliminary Plat of Hawk Hollow Addition West side, 600 block of 8th Street 2.3 acres Vacant R-4 One-to-Six Family Dwelling District Residential BACKGROUND The City of Moline owns all vacant land adjacent to One Moline Place and is attempting to continue redevelopment of the former Moline Public and Moline Lutheran hospital sites. The City has been in negotiations with a private developer to construct a group of residential multiplexes on a 2-acre terrace located below the hilltop, a site formerly used as a parking lot for Moline Public Hospital (later Trinity Hospital). This site was intended to be the fourth phase of One Moline Place. ANALYSIS The original Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the site called for 36 townhome villa units with a private drive for access. The developer and engineer have prepared several conceptual plans for the site and have found the original plan is not viable; the units were too dense with inadequate access and excessive disturbances to the hillsides and wooded areas. The current proposal includes five (5) two-story apartment buildings, each containing three (3) townhouse-style dwelling units, surrounding a full-width public street (6 th Avenue Court) with cul-de-sac for access. Each apartment would have its own garage, kitchen, and living area on the first floor with bedrooms on the second floor. The name of the proposed development is Hawk Hollow. This is a two-lot subdivision. All proposed apartment buildings will remain on Lot 1 which will be sold to the developer after the City installs the street, sidewalks, and infrastructure using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District #6 1

3 funds. Lot 2 is steeply sloped and heavily wooded and will be retained by the City for the foreseeable future. The steep hillsides on the property carry a large volume of runoff and are susceptible to erosion. It was determined that pulling the dwellings away from the hillsides would limit disturbances to the slopes, eliminate the need for large retaining walls, and enable improved grading to properly manage stormwater. The Zoning Hearing Officer approved a variance at the March 19 meeting to reduce the front yard setback from 25 feet to 20 feet to better accommodate this need. The plan includes storm sewer and a small detention basin to capture runoff. The proposal also includes other stormwater best management practices (BMPs) not often found in residential subdivisions, including permeable pavement for 6 th Avenue Court and an infiltration trench in the boulevard. Other than the setback variance, the plat meets all City requirements and has been designed with staff input. There are no outstanding issues. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposal will continue the redevelopment of the old Trinity Hospital site, a stated goal in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal promotes quality infill development that is sensitive to the site conditions and the character of surrounding neighborhoods. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend to City Council to approve the Preliminary Plat of Hawk Hollow Addition. ATTACHMENTS Zoning and Tax Parcel map, Preliminary Plat, subdivision application form 2

4 419 8 ST GUTIERREZ ST MEE ST REYES ST VALLADARES ST QUAD ST REYES ST ROSAS ST PROVENCIO ST AGUILAR 7THST C-2 CITY AVE BOYS ST GOMEZ NC ST GUZMAN 8THST ST GUERRERO AVE LOPEZ ST VILLAGOMEZ ST FERKEL R AVE NAVARRO ST ST CITY ST DHAMERS Proposed Hawk Hollow Development 720 7TH ST CT BULLER 760 7TH ST CT RIVES 901 6TH ST DR 910 6TH ST DR BETT 911 7TH ST DR TH A VE BUTTERW ORTH 851 9T MC H AV GE E C HE T E 841 9TH AVE CT 831 9TH AVE CT 821 9TH AVE CT 721 9TH AVE CT T 880 7TH ST CT PAULEY 731 9TH AVE CT R TH AVE CT 900 7TH ST DR 901 8TH ST DR 830 9TH AVE CT 840 9TH AVE CT 8TH S 891 7TH ST CT BLUMMER 850 7TH ST CT PAUWELS 751 9TH AVE CT 811 9TH AVE CT 810 7TH ST CT SULLIVAN 801 9TH AVE CT 831 7TH ST CT COURTNEY 861 7TH ST CT RUBERG HO TH S WA T C RD T 640 7TH S T CT CRAND ALL MOLINE 771 7TH S T CT COSSIN 7THSTCT 6THST CT ST E TH HE 17 E 67 MCG MC TH S GE T C HE T E AVE ST 631 7TH ST CT AVE BRERETON 5THAV

5 6THST 7THST 8THST 5THAV Proposed Hawk Hollow Development 7THSTCT 8THST 9THAVCT

6 APPLICATION FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION Filing Date $900 Filing Fee (non-refundable) submitted: $400 Filing Fee Final Plat submitted (for more than 1 year from Preliminary Plat approval) Answer all statements fully. Attach six (6) full-size subdivision plats and one (1) reduction. 1. Proposed Name: 2. Location: 3. Area in acres: 4. Owner: 5. Owner Phone: 6. Owner Address: 7. Developer: 8. Developer Phone: 9. Developer Address: 10. Developer Surveyor: 12. Engineer responsible for improvements: 12. Method of financing improvements: 13. Person responsible for stake-out and inspection: 14. Any special or other assessments against property: Yes No a. Will they be paid in full: Yes No b. Reapportioned: Yes No 15. Is land entirely in City of Moline: Yes No 16. Will it be annexed: Yes No 17. Proposed Land Use: 18. Existing zoning: 19. Will zoning change be requested: Yes No 20. Zoning requested: 21. Minimum lot area: 22. Minimum lot width at building line 23. Variance of Ordinance requirements requested - submit letter requesting variances and reasons for the request. a. Building setback d. Street grade b. Lot frontage on street e. Street paving c. Street width f. Easements 24. Water supply system shown: Proposed Existing 25. Sewer disposal system shown: Proposed Existing 26. Drainage system shown: Proposed Existing 27. Scale of plat: 28. Date of Plat: 29. Physical size of plat: 30. Deed restrictions submitted: 31. Sidewalk statement included? 32. Sidewalks placed other than one foot off property line: 33. Concrete monuments and lot pins shown as per ordinance: Yes No 34. Do easements conform to ordinance requirements: Yes No 35. Expected date of development: 36. Miscellaneous: The above statements are complete and correct. Signature of Owner or Agent

7