PLAN COMMISSION MEETING Monday, March 27, 2017 at 4:30 p.m. Council Chambers in the Municipal Building AGENDA:

PLAN COMMISSION MEETING Monday, March 27, 2017 at 4:30 p.m. Council Chambers in the Municipal Building AGENDA: 1) 516 West Street PH CUP Request 2) 1923 Gateway Drive, 1925 Gateway Drive & 2011 Airport Road John DeWitt Preliminary CSM Review 3) N8776 County Road E Donald Kiedrowski Preliminary CSM Review 4) Site Plan Review Minutes February 27, 2017 5) Plan Commission Minutes March 13, 2017

516 West Street Background: Andy and Ryan Tessman of Emergency Starting & Towing, LLC are requesting a Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Storage or Wholesaling. Andy and Ryan have recently purchased this property and will be building a 4,980 square feet structure for use with their towing services. The need for an Outdoor Storage or Wholesaling Conditional Use Permit arises from the short term storage of towed/wrecked vehicles (before they are sent to a salvage yard). This site development went before the Site Plan Review Committee on February 27, 2017 (minutes attached). Issues: The following issues have been identified by the City of Watertown Zoning Administrator: 1. Per Section 550-53B: B. Outdoor storage or wholesaling. Description: Outdoor storage and wholesaling land uses are primarily oriented to the receiving, holding and shipping of packaged materials for a single business or a single group of businesses. Such a land use in which any activity beyond loading and parking is located outdoors is considered an outdoor storage and wholesaling land use. Examples of this land use include contractors' storage yards, equipment yards, lumberyards, coal yards, landscaping materials yard, construction materials yards, and shipping materials yards. Such land uses do not include the storage of inoperative vehicles or equipment or other materials typically associated with a junkyard or salvage yard (see Subsection D below). (1) Regulations: (a) All outdoor storage areas shall be completely enclosed by any permitted combination of buildings, structures, walls and fencing. Such walls and fencing shall be a minimum of eight feet in height and shall be designed to completely screen all stored materials from view from nonindustrialized areas at an elevation of five feet above the grade of all adjacent properties and rights-of-way. Said walls or fencing shall be screened from residentially zoned property by a bufferyard with a minimum opacity of 0.80. (b) The storage of items shall not be permitted in permanently protected green space areas (see 550-97). (c) The storage of items shall not be permitted in required frontage landscaping or bufferyard areas. (d) In no event shall the storage of items reduce or inhibit the use or number of parking stalls provided on the property below the requirement established by the provisions of 550-107. If the number of provided parking stalls on the property is already less than the requirement, such storage area shall not further reduce the number of parking stalls already present. (e) Storage areas shall be separated from any vehicular parking or circulation area by a minimum of 10 feet. This separation shall

be clearly delimited by a physical separation such as a greenway, curb, fence or line of planters, or by a clearly marked paved area. (f) Materials being stored shall not interfere in any manner with either on-site or off-site traffic visibility, including potential traffic/traffic and traffic/pedestrian conflicts. (g) Inoperative vehicles or equipment, or other items typically stored in a junkyard or salvage yard, shall not be stored under the provisions of this land use. (h) Facility shall provide a bufferyard with a minimum opacity of 0.60 along all property borders abutting residentially zoned property (see 550-99). (i) All outdoor storage areas shall be located no closer to a residentially zoned property than the required minimum setback for buildings on the subject property. (2) Parking requirements. One space for every 10,000 square feet of gross storage area, plus one space per each employee on the largest work shift 2. The Zoning Administrator asks that the Plan Commission works with Andy and Ryan to define short-term storage of vehicles. This is to prevent salvage yard complaints. Options: These are the following options, but not limited to, for the Plan Commission based on the information received by the City of Watertown Zoning Administrator: 1. Denial of the Conditional Use Permit 2. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit 3. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit with conditions identified by the Plan Commission and/or Site Plan Review Committee

1923 Gateway Drive, 1925 Gateway Drive & 2011 Airport Road -CSM Background: John DeWitt and Watertown Land Improvement, Inc. are looking to create 3 new lots. Lot 1 is a 1.2 acre lot created from 37 acre parent parcel. Lot 2 is a 2.1 acre lot created from the same 37 acre parent parcel. Lot 3 is a 137.8 acre lot, which is combing 40 acre parcel, a 30.9 acre parcel, a 1 acre parcel (located in the Town of Watertown), the remainder of the parent parcel for Lots 1 &2, and a 32 acre parcel. Lots 1 & 2 are to be developed for residential purposes, while Lot 3 is to remain in agricultural use. Issues: The following issues have been identified by the City of Watertown Zoning Administrator: 1. The Zoning Administrator has concerns about the apparent addition of the 1 acre parcel (PIN: 032-0815-1634-005). This parcel is not within the City Limits of the City of Watertown. This parcel would need to be annexed in before its inclusion into Lot 3. The Zoning Administrator doubts that annexation is even possible due to the creation of a town island of the two properties to the north. 2. Gateway Drive is identified in the 2009 City of Watertown Comprehensive Plan as having an expanded right-of-way, this means that the right-of-way should be 80 feet (40 feet from centerline) a. The Preliminary CSM does not indicate that the right-of-way has been dedicated to 40 feet from Centerline i. The Final CSM needs to dedicate right-of-way 40 feet from the centerline. 3. Airport Road is identified in the 2009 City of Watertown Comprehensive Plan as having an expanded right-of-way; this means that the right-of-way should be 100 feet (50 feet from centerline). a. The Preliminary CSM does not indicate that the right-of-way has been dedicated to 50 feet from the centerline. i. The Final CSM needs to dedicate right-of-way 50 feet from the centerline. 4. Airport Approach Protection Zone elevation limits development on the newly created lots to 968 feet above mean sea level. The City of Watertown is looking to maintain the proper height restrictions within the Airport Approach Protection Zone under Wisconsin Statute Section 114.136(1)(a) which states: POWERS OF MUNICIPALITIES. (a) Any county, city, village or town that is the owner of a site for an airport or spaceport which has been approved for such purpose by the appropriate agencies of the state and the federal government may protect the aerial approaches to such site by ordinance regulating, restricting and determining the use, location, height, number of stories and size of buildings and structures and object of natural growth in the vicinity of such site and may divide the territory to be protected into several areas and impose different regulations and restrictions with respect to each area. The provisions of such ordinance shall be

effective whether the site and the lands affected by such ordinance are located within or without the limits of such county, city, village or town, and whether or not such buildings, structures and object of natural growth are in existence on the effective date of the ordinance. Such regulations, restrictions and determinations are declared to be for the purpose of promoting the public safety, welfare and convenience, and may be adopted, enforced and administrated without the consent of any other governing body. Any ordinance adopted under this section may be amended from time to time in the same manner as is provided for the adoption of the original ordinance in sub. (2). The authority granted in this section shall be independent and exclusive of any other authority granted in the statutes. a. The CSM should State: i. Note: Lot 1, Lot 2 and Lot 3 have an Airport Approach Protection Zone elevation limit of 968 feet above mean sea level for all building, structures and object of natural growth; whether or not such buildings, structures and object of natural growth are in existence. Options: These are the following options, but not limited to, for the Plan Commission based on the information received by the City of Watertown Zoning Administrator: 1. Denial of the Preliminary CSM 2. Approval of the Preliminary CSM without conditions 3. Approval of the Preliminary CSM with conditions, as identified by the Plan Commission: a. Resolve the issue with the 1 acre lot (PIN: 032-0815-1634-005). b. For Lot 1, Lot 2 and Lot 3 a 40 feet from centerline dedication of right-ofway needs to be indicated for Gateway Drive. c. For Lot 3, along Airport Road, a 50 feet from centerline dedication of rightof-way needs to be indicated. d. Create a note that states: i. Note: Lot 1, Lot 2 and Lot 3 have an Airport Approach Protection Zone elevation limit of 968 feet above mean sea level for all building, structures and object of natural growth; whether or not such buildings, structures and object of natural growth are in existence.

County Road E Extraterritorial CSM Background: Donald Kiedrowski would like to create a 1 acre parcel from 29 acre parent parcel. Issues: The following issues have been identified by the City of Watertown Zoning Administrator: 5. County Road E is identified in the 2009 City of Watertown Comprehensive Plan as having an expanded Right-of-Way, this means that the Right-of-Way should be 120 feet (60 feet from centerline) a. The Preliminary CSM indicates a right-of-way dedication of 33 feet from centerline, this needs to be amended to 60 feet from the centerline i. The Final CSM needs to indicate a right-of-way dedication of 60 feet from the centerline for County Road E. 6. Airport Approach Protection Zone elevation limits development on the newly created lot to 950 feet above mean sea level. The City of Watertown is looking to maintain the proper height restrictions within the Airport Approach Protection Zone under Wisconsin Statute Section 114.136(1)(a) which states: POWERS OF MUNICIPALITIES. (a) Any county, city, village or town that is the owner of a site for an airport or spaceport which has been approved for such purpose by the appropriate agencies of the state and the federal government may protect the aerial approaches to such site by ordinance regulating, restricting and determining the use, location, height, number of stories and size of buildings and structures and object of natural growth in the vicinity of such site and may divide the territory to be protected into several areas and impose different regulations and restrictions with respect to each area. The provisions of such ordinance shall be effective whether the site and the lands affected by such ordinance are located within or without the limits of such county, city, village or town, and whether or not such buildings, structures and object of natural growth are in existence on the effective date of the ordinance. Such regulations, restrictions and determinations are declared to be for the purpose of promoting the public safety, welfare and convenience, and may be adopted, enforced and administrated without the consent of any other governing body. Any ordinance adopted under this section may be amended from time to time in the same manner as is provided for the adoption of the original ordinance in sub. (2). The authority granted in this section shall be independent and exclusive of any other authority granted in the statutes. a. The CSM should State: i. Note: Lot 1 has an Airport Approach Protection Zone elevation limit of 950 feet above mean sea level for all building, structures and object of natural growth; whether or not such buildings, structures and object of natural growth are in existence.

Options: These are the following options, but not limited to, for the Plan Commission based on the information received by the City of Watertown Zoning Administrator: 4. Denial of the Preliminary CSM 5. Approval of the Preliminary CSM without conditions 6. Approval of the Preliminary CSM with conditions, as identified by the Plan Commission: a. For Lot 1, revise current dedication to a dedication of 60 feet from the centerline for County Road E. b. Create a note that states: i. Note: Lot 1 has an Airport Approach Protection Zone elevation limit of 950 feet above mean sea level for all building, structures and object of natural growth; whether or not such buildings, structures and object of natural growth are in existence.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given by the Plan Commission of the City of Watertown, Wisconsin, that a public hearing will be held on the 27 th day of March, 2017 in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 106 Jones Street, Watertown, Wisconsin at 4:30 P.M., or shortly thereafter, to consider the request of Andy and Ryan Tessman of Emergency Starting & Towing, LLC for a Conditional Use Permit for Outdoor Storage or Wholesaling Land Use under Sections 550-36B(2) and Section 550-53B. The property zoned General Industrial (GI) and is further described as follows: L. Hubbell's Addition, Block 5, Part of Lot 1, as Described and Recorded in Volume 210, Page 570, Also Part of Section 4 and 5,T8N, R15E, as Described and Recorded in Volume 675, Page 663. Located in the City of Watertown, Jefferson County, WI, in the City of Watertown, Jefferson County, Wisconsin. (516 West Street) All persons wishing to be heard are invited to be present. CITY OF WATERTOWN Jacob A. Maas Zoning Administrator JM/nmz PUBLISH: March 13, 2017 and March 20, 2017 (BLOCK AD)

Southwest Perspective Emergency Starting and Towing EST LLC 2-16-17

Northwest Perspective Emergency Starting and Towing EST LLC 2-16-17

Southeast Perspective Emergency Starting and Towing EST LLC 2-16-17

Northeast Perspective Emergency Starting and Towing EST LLC 2-16-17

Emergency Starting and Towing EST LLC 2-16-17

Legend for Plan Designations Emergency Starting and Towing EST LLC 2-16-17

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE February 27, 2017 The Site Plan Review Committee met on the above date at 1:30 P.M. in Room 2044 of the Municipal Building. The following members were present: John David, Jacob Maas, Jaynellen Holloway, Andrew Beyer, Jay Haberkorn, Tim Gordon, Greg Michalek, Doug Zwieg, Robert Schwerer, Kevin Freber, Rick Schultz, Mike Slavney and Curt Kleppin. Also in attendance were Secretary Nikki Zimmerman, Elizabeth LeRoy of Excel Engineering, Mark Powers of Lake Country Engineering, Ryan Tessman and Andy Tessman of Emergency Starting & Towing, Neal Wiebelhaus of Morton Buildings, Dan Shea of Maas Brothers, and Ryan Stork of Clasen Quality Chocolate. Chairperson Jacob Maas called the meeting to order. 1. 420 & 421 E. Horseshoe Road Clasen Quality Chocolate Proposed Building Expansion This item is for a proposed expansion to the west on the north property. Plans have been submitted by Excel Engineering. The new sprinkler system will tie into the existing sprinkler system. With no concerns stated by present City staff, a motion was made and seconded to recommend approval of this project with no conditions. Unanimously approved. 2. 516 West Street Emergency Starting & Towing Proposed Building Emergency Starting & Towing is proposing to have a 4,980 s.f. structure built on the premises to be used for storing their trucks and equipment. There will not be any sewer or water to the building at this time. Wall packs will be full cutoff fixtures. The following items were discussed: 1) An erosion control plan and permit must be submitted to the Engineering Department staff for review and approval. 2) Landscaping will be required and an updated site plan depicting the landscaping should be submitted for approval. Applicants may work with City Planner Mike Slavney to accomplish this. 3) Any items being stored outside of the structure will require a conditional use permit and should be depicted on the site plan. A list of what could potentially be stored on this property should also be submitted. 4) The revised site plan can be reviewed by staff without the necessity of this item returning to the Site Plan Review Committee. A motion was made and seconded to recommend approval of this item to the Plan Commission pending submittal of plans and the erosion control permit and plans. Unanimously approved. 3. Site Plan Review Minutes November 28, 2016 Motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. There being no further business to come before this committee, motion was made and seconded to adjourn. So ordered. Respectfully submitted, Nikki Zimmerman, Secretary NOTE: These minutes are uncorrected and any corrections made thereto will be noted in the proceedings at which these minutes are approved.

Rich Rd Gypsy Rd Hilltop Rd Welsh Rd Canadian Pacific Railroad To Columbus Quarry Rd Provimi Rd K Town of Shields Town of Emmet 100' 120' 120' Q 16 26 Union Pacific Railroad Watertown Country Club Silver Creek N Water St 16 2nd Street Rd 100' Center St To Juneau & Wild Goose Trail 120' M Juneau St Existing Parks & Open Space Facilities Community Park 1. Brandt Quirk Park 2. Riverside Park 3. Washington Park 4. Reagan Park Neighborhood Park 5. Brandenstein Park 6. Clark Park 7. Deer Trail Park 8. Grinwald Park 9. Hunter Oaks Park 10. Lincoln Park 11. Mary Rose Park 12. Schaller Park 13. South Concord Estates Park Public School Facilities A. Douglas Elementary School B. Lincoln Elementary School C. Schurz Elementary School D. Webster Elementary School E. Riverside Junior High F. Watertown High School G. MATC - Watertown Campus Hancock Rd 14. Timothy Johnson Park 15. Union Park Special Use Parks 16. East Water Street 17. Fannie P. Lewis Park 18. Kalota Park 19. Pet Exercise Area 20. River Walkway 21. Senior Center Grounds 22. Silver Creek 23. Skate/BMX Park 24. Tivoli Island 25. Veterans Memorial 26. Watertown East Apartment Area Private School Facilities H. Calvary Baptist Christian School I. St. Bernard's School J. St. Henry's Catholic School K. St. John's Lutheran School L. St. Mark's Lutheran School M. Trinity-St. Luke's School - Clark St Campus N. Trinity-St. Luke's School - Western Ave Campus O. Luther Preparatory School P. Maranatha Baptist Bible College 120' N 2nd St 120' 120' R 120' 100' 120' 1 F 5 E Spaulding St 23 A N 4th St 11 EM DODGE COUNTY JEFFERSON COUNTY Canadian Pacific Railroad To Madison Horseshoe Rd 100' 120' 100' 19 T 120' Horseshoe Rd 100' 4 9 G A 120' 14 24 H 8 River Rd West St 7 Milford Rd 10 B I P 15 12 Jefferson Rd River Dr Water St 21 17 J K 22 L 20 26 S 3rd St 6 M C 80' 80' Western Ave N S 9th St Air Park Dr D S 12th St O 3 Clark St Hall St South Rd E 16 25 19 27 120' 18 S Concord Ave 13 CW E E Gate Dr Summit Ave Canadian Pacific Railroad Watertown Conservation Club Windwood Country Club River Rd Gopher Hill Rd 100' 16 To Milwaukee 120' 100' 100' High Rd Beryl Dr Airport Rd 100' 120' Roc k River 100' A 120' Town of Milford Town of Watertown Rock River 120' Transportation & Community Facilities Y Union Pacific Railroad 100' Map 7 City of Watertown Comprehensive Plan City of Watertown County Boundary Town Boundary Urban Service Area Boundary State Highway County Highway Local Road Proposed Highway 26 Bypass Right of Way Railroads Existing Amtrak Passenger Rail Surface Water To Johnson Creek & Glacial Drumlin Trail 26 120' Turf Dr Existing Facilities Airport Community Facility Land Area Public & Private Park & Recreation Land Area School Higher Education Facility Public Safety Building Hospital Library Post Office Public Works Building Waste Water Treatment Plant Water Utility Facility Water Tower Grade Separation Ebenezer Dr 120' 120' X Johnson Creek 100' Cemetery Senior/Community Center Museum Planned Facilities Proposed Bike/Ped Facility Trailhead Proposed Neighborhood Park Proposed Community Park Proposed School Site Proposed High-Speed Rail Station Proposed Bridge Enhancement Proposed Intersection Improvement Proposed Park & Ride Proposed Grade Separation Proposed Interchange xx' D E Pipersville Rd Proposed Road Proposed Street Enhancement Road Section to be Removed Proposed High-Speed Rail Passenger Line Proposed Bike/Ped Trail Proposed Riverwalk Proposed Right-of-Way Width Source: ESRI, City of Watertown, Counties of Dodge & Jefferson LIO 0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 Miles Adopted: November 17, 2009 VANDEWALLE & ASSOCIATES INC. Shaping places, shaping change

Plan Commission Minutes Monday, March 13 th, 2017 The Plan Commission met on the above date at 4:30pm in Council Chambers of Municipal Building with the following members present: Council President & Acting Mayor Fred Smith, Ken Berg, Rick Tortomasi, Tony Arnett, Augie Tietz and Jaynellen Holloway, along w/ Zoning Administrator Jacob Maas. 1: Preliminary Review of Floodplain & Shoreline Ordinance: Fred Smith asked Jacob Maas to provide a summary of this issue. Jacob noted that on October 4 th, 2016 our Council re codified & updated General Code for the City of Watertown but in doing so proposed revisions in Chapter 532 involving Floodplain & Shoreland Wetland Zoning were inadvertently omitted. Therefore, the approval process needs to be adhered to on these proposed changes, most of which are housekeeping or definitional type changes. The next step is for a public hearing for possible public comment. Augie Tietz moved to send this proposed Ordinance with changes to portions of Chapter 532 to a Public Hearing in front of our City Council on April 3 rd, 2017, seconded by Tony Arnett and approved unanimously. 2: Review PH Comments Section 550 15, Definitions & Amendments for Large Scale/Small Scale Alcoholic Beverage Production: Jacob Maas provided an update stating that the issue of reviewing public comments from our last Council meeting on proposed changes to Section 550 15 of City Code resulted in no comments being hear. Jacob also noted he was attempting to be proactive by initiating some changes to allow brewpubs, micro breweries, micro distilleries outside of Heavy Industrial & Rural Holding zoning districts. Therefore, for what are defined as small scale alcoholic beverage production facilities, the above activities would be allowed by CUP in Neighborhood Office, Planned Office, Neighborhood Business, Planned Business, General Business, Central Business & Planned Industrial zoning districts. And, large scale alcoholic beverage production facilities would continue to be an allowed land use in Heavy Industrial zoning districts by right. Tony Arnett moved to recommend our Council adopt the proposed changes to Section 550 15 of our City Code, having to do w/ large & small scale alcoholic beverage production, seconded by Rick Tortomasi and approved unanimously. 3: Plan Commission Minutes February 13, 2017: Motion made by Rick Tortomasi to approve Plan Commission minutes for February 13, 2017 as written, then seconded by Jaynellen Holloway and approved unanimously. There being no further business to come before the Commission, a motion to adjourn at 4:39pm was made by Augie Tietz and seconded by Jaynellen Holloway. So ordered. Respectfully Submitted, Ken Berg Alderperson