The BAR recommended approval of the major COA with the following 10 conditions at the special meeting on March 28, 2018. Project: Address: Case Number: Applicant: ATTACHMENT 9e Paul VI Redevelopment 10675 Fairfax Boulevard, 10600 an 10606 Cedar Avenue BAR-17-00406 IDI Fairfax MAJOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Pursuant to Chapter 110 of the Code of the City of Fairfax, the proposed mixed-use development is approved as of, with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall return to the Board of Architectural Review for final review and approval of a detailed landscape plan including an interim landscape plan for the site of the Phase 2 portion of the condominium building, as well as a detailed lighting plan, light fixture specifications, amenity locations and details, and final design and screening of any rooftop equipment or appurtenances associated with the school building. 2. The school building shall be designed as shown in Option 2 to preserve the front façade of the school building, and as shown in Option 1 for the side and rear elevations, modified as necessary to eliminate elements from the side elevations that would obscure or alter the architectural features of the front façade. 3. Damaged architectural elements of the front façade of the school building shall be repaired in a manner that does not alter their materials or appearance. 4. New brickwork on the school building shall match the existing brickwork in color, mortar, and bonding pattern. 5. The applicant shall create and implement signage design criteria for the school building in compliance with 3.8.2.F. of the Zoning Ordinance so that the architectural features of the preserved front façade are not obscured or altered. 6. The side elevations of all townhouses shall be all brick. 7. The modified historic structure reports for the John C. Wood House and Paul VI High School shall be revised and resubmitted to incorporate the comments included in the Director of Historic Resources memorandum to the BAR, dated March 15, 2018, and to include additional documentation of the auditorium of Paul VI High School. 8. The proposed changes shall be in general conformance with the review materials received by staff and modified through the date of this meeting, except as further modified by the Board of Architectural Review, the Director of Community Development and Planning, the Building Official, or Zoning as necessary. 9. The two flanking retail buildings are not approved as presented, and shall be brought back for review by the Board at a future date. 10. Any historic markers shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Historic Resources prior to installation. Please note: A. The applicant shall not deviate from the approved design. Any subsequent changes to the proposed design, including changes to architectural details, color, materials and signage, must receive approval from the BAR or City staff prior to construction. Any deviation without City approval shall be subject to the penalties provided by the Code of the City of Fairfax.
B. The applicant is responsible for incorporating this approved design with its conditions into the plans submitted to the City of Fairfax and for obtaining all required permits prior to construction or installation. C. This Certificate shall become null and void if no significant improvement or alteration is made in accordance with the approved application within eighteen (18) months from the date of approval. Date Director of Community Development and Planning Date
ATTACHMENT 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA TO CHANGE THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP FROM INSTITUTIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL - LOW TO BUSINESS COMMERCIAL, TRANSITIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL - HIGH AS DEPICTED ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT FOR THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS CITY OF FAIRFAX TAX MAP PARCELS 57-1-02-112, 113 AND 114. WHEREAS, IDI Fairfax, L.C., has requested an amendment to change the designation of the City of Fairfax Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map for City of Fairfax tax map parcels 57-1- 02-112, 113 and 114 from their current designation as Institutional and Residential Low to their proposed designation as Business Commercial, Transitional and Residential - High; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered the proposed amendment, as well as testimony and other evidence received at the public hearing, including the staff report; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the proposed amendment is proper, in accordance with the applicable provisions of law, and should be approved; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City of Fairfax Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map be amended from the current designation for tax map parcels 57-1-02-112, 113 and 114 as Institutional and Residential Low to the proposed designation for said parcels as Business Commercial, Transitional and Residential High as depicted on the attached exhibit. This resolution shall be effective as provided by law. Planning Commission hearing: April 23, 2018 Adopted:
ATTACHMENT 12 12. MOTIONS: ATTACHMENTS: [If the Planning Commission agrees with the staff recommendation, then Motions 12A and 12C are appropriate] 12A. Motion to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 12B. Motion to recommend denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 12C. Motion to recommend approval of the Zoning Map Amendment (rezoning) subject to revisions to the Master Development Plan. 12D. Motion to recommend approval of the Zoning Map Amendment (rezoning). 12E. Motion to recommend denial of the Zoning Map Amendment (rezoning).
Planning Commission Sample Motion ATTACHMENT 12A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVAL I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA TO CLASSIFY AS BUSINESS COMMERCIAL, TRANSITIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL - HIGH ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS CITY OF FAIRFAX TAX MAP PARCELS 57-1-02-112, 113 AND 114.
Planning Commission Sample Motion ATTACHMENT 12B COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT DENIAL I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION DISAPPROVE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA TO CLASSIFY AS BUSINESS COMMERCIAL, TRANSITIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL - HIGH ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS CITY OF FAIRFAX TAX MAP PARCELS 57-1-02-112, 113 AND 114.
Planning Commission Sample Motion ATTACHMENT 12C Rezoning Z-17040060 APPROVAL WITH REVISIONS (Recommended by Staff) BASED ON THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, WELFARE AND GOOD ZONING PRACTICE, WITH RESPECT TO REZONING APPLICATION Z-17040060, WHICH HAS BEEN FILED FOR THE LAND KNOWN AS 10675 FAIRFAX BOULEVARD, 10600 CEDAR AVENUE AND 10606 CEDAR AVENUE AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS TAX MAP PARCELS 57-1-02-112, 113 AND 114, I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF REZONING APPLICATION Z-17040060 TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM CR COMMERCIAL RETAIL, RM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM AND JOHN C. WOOD HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT TO PD-M PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WHICH HAS BEEN PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT, IF THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS SUFFICIENTLY AND SATISFACTORILY REVISED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Provide a statement in the MDP Narrative that clarifies that the narrative is a part of the MDP and should be read in coordination with the MDP; 2. Remove the statement from the MDP Narrative that suggests and/or relies upon City participation in the floodplain control project; 3. Revise the landscape plan in the area near the southwest corner of the site, near Pat Rodio Park to provide overstory and ornamental trees in place of evergreen trees; 4. Provide at least one crosswalk across the private street near the southwest corner of the site, allowing a connection between the open spaces on the north and south sides of that street. 5. Extend the multi-use trail along the southern property line from the Cedar/Keith intersection to the southwest property line near Panther Place and provide a connection between the trail and the intersection of Mclean Avenue and Cedar Avenue; 6. Comply with the Zoning Ordinance by adding a request for a modification to Section 3.5.1.D.1(b) pertaining to the required percentage of ground floor area allocated to nonresidential uses in an upper-story residential mixed use building; 7. Specify the limited non-residential uses that would be permitted on the ground floor of the upper-story residential mixed use buildings considering potential adverse impacts to the community;
Planning Commission Sample Motion 8. Comply with the Zoning Ordinance by adding a request for a modification to Section 4.4.4.A.1, which requires that sidewalks must be located on both sides of all streets; 9. Provide a phasing plan to clarify when project improvements such as public amenities and infrastructure would be constructed in relation to the timeframe for the overall development, in accordance with the requirements of Section 3.8.2.H of the Zoning Ordinance; 10. Indicate on the MDP whether accessible units or universal design strategies will be provided; 11. Adjust parking calculations and discussion on parking for the MDP as follows: a. Remove modifications requests pertaining to requirements for parking quantities in the Zoning Ordinance. Such modifications are not necessary based on the proposed parking quantities indicated in the MDP; b. If the applicant intends to provide parking in support of Pat Rodio Park, such parking must be identified on the MDP and considered in the parking calculations; c. Provide a shared parking analysis inclusive of commercial and appropriate residential uses to support inclusion of commercial parking spaces within the multifamily parking garage; d. Indicate that time restrictions will be applicable to all on-street parking to ensure turnover during daytime hours. Indicate that amendments to such parking restrictions may be approved by the Director of Community Development and Planning subject to supporting analysis having been submitted by the applicant or Community Association. 12. Clarify how utility service would be continued to existing residences on the east side of McLean Avenue if existing utilities are relocated underground; 13. Provide a preliminary sanitary capacity analysis prior to City Council hearings as specified by the Department of Public Works; 14. Include a provision in the MDP that addresses the City s goals and objectives as they pertain to affordable housing, including those set forth in the Comprehensive Plan; 15. Provide for sufficient community benefits in the MDP as they pertain to schools, public parks and transportation; 16. Provide for temporary signage identifying the project in the Construction Management Plan; 17. Identify measures to protect the existing historical marker along Fairfax Boulevard in the Construction Management Plan; 18. Add a note to the MDP stating that any realignment of the private accessway near the southwest corner of the site that results from an approved plan for the relocation of Panther Place, which is not a part of this application, shall be deemed in conformance with the approved MPD provided there is no decrease in recreation and open space, no decrease in the quantity of parking spaces and there are no other significant modifications to the plan.
Planning Commission Sample Motion ATTACHMENT 12D Rezoning Z-17040060 APPROVAL BASED ON THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, WELFARE AND GOOD ZONING PRACTICE, WITH RESPECT TO REZONING APPLICATION Z-17040060, WHICH HAS BEEN FILED FOR THE LAND KNOWN AS 10675 FAIRFAX BOULEVARD, 10600 CEDAR AVENUE AND 10606 CEDAR AVENUE AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS TAX MAP PARCELS 57-1-02-112, 113 AND 114, I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF REZONING APPLICATION Z-17040060 TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM CR COMMERCIAL RETAIL, RM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM AND JOHN C. WOOD HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT TO PD-M PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WHICH HAS BEEN PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT.
Planning Commission Sample Motion ATTACHMENT 12E Rezoning Z-17040060 DENIAL BASED ON THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, WELFARE AND GOOD ZONING PRACTICE, WITH RESPECT TO REZONING APPLICATION Z-17040060, WHICH HAS BEEN FILED FOR THE LAND KNOWN AS 10675 FAIRFAX BOULEVARD, 10600 CEDAR AVENUE AND 10606 CEDAR AVENUE AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS TAX MAP PARCELS 57-1-02-112, 113 AND 114, I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION Z-17040060 TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM CR COMMERCIAL RETAIL, RM RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM AND JOHN C. WOOD HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT TO PD-M PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MIXED USE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: (Planning Commission may choose one or more grounds from the following sample reasons or may craft additional reasons supporting denial) The applicant s proposal, as set forth in the Master Development Plan, is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted City goals and policies; The applicant s proposal, as set forth in the Master Development Plan, will adversely impact the safety and movement of vehicular traffic upon adjacent streets; The density of the applicant s proposal, as set forth the Master Development Plan, is incompatible with and will adversely impact adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood; The applicant s proposal, as set forth in the Master Development Plan, will adversely impact the health, safety and welfare of residents living in the vicinity of the subject property.