Main Street Parking Area Strategy. Borough of South River Middlesex County, New Jersey

Similar documents
Main Street Parking Area Strategy. Borough of South River Middlesex County, New Jersey

CITY OF COLD SPRING ORDINANCE NO. 304

Development Opportunity: Priority Development Site

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015

Truax Park Apartments

Saskatchewan Municipal Financing Tools

Chapter 10: Implementation

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

density framework ILLUSTRATION 3: DENSITY (4:1 FSR) EXPRESSED THROUGH BUILT FORM Example 1

Planning Justification Report for 324 York Street

DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT

Frequently Asked Questions

G. HRA Member Area Surveys a. Area 1 Survey Sample b. Area 1-10 descriptions for surveys

Development Impact & Capacity Fees

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

Downtown Plano. Creating a Transit Village

Ordinance No Affordable Housing Ordinance Borough of Glen Ridge, Essex County

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND STRATEGIES

NC 54/I-40 Corridor Master Plan Draft Land Use Blueprint

THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

The Corporation of the District of Central Saanich

Proposed Development at Ajax Plaza Windcorp Grand Harwood Place Ltd.

ARTICLE IX PARKING AND LOADING SPACES

Jacobs Landing Rehabilitation Plan

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS RESPECTING THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE YEARS , INCLUSIVE

DRAFT REPORT. Boudreau Developments Ltd. Hole s Site - The Botanica: Fiscal Impact Analysis. December 18, 2012

Inspira Medical Center Woodbury Development Options Report

A. This ordinance shall not be effective until approved by COAH pursuant to NJAC 5:

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

Arizona Department of Housing Five-Year Strategic Plan

RESOLUTION NO R-023

VERTICAL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT (Urban Village)

Plan Dutch Village Road

2015 Downtown Parking Study

Scattered Sites Redevelopment Plan

Re: 101 and 105 Champagne: Building 2 Parking Requirements Study

Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission

Parking Inventory and Needs Study

NOTICE ORDINANCE NO Township of Neptune County of Monmouth

10.0 Implementation. IM Goal 10.2: Ensure the Plan is fully implementable and is financially self-sufficient.

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

CONNECTING ARLINGTON S POLICY FRAMEWORK TO THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING WORKING GROUP

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

City of Boerne, Texas Incentives Policy

VILLAGE OF LITTLE CHUTE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT/FAÇADE RENOVATION PROGRAM

NJAC 5:97-2.2(e), the provision of affordable housing shall be based on the issuance of

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL City of Brighton Downtown Development Authority

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

Public Portion: Mr. Bianchini opened the public portion. There being no comment, the public portion was closed. Resolutions:

PART ONE - GENERAL INFORMATION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS DOWNTOWN MT. PLEASANT, MICHIGAN PARKING STUDY

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

Residences at Grove Park 425 Hillsborough St. Chapel Hill, NC

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016

Franklin Township Somerset County, New Jersey

City of St. Petersburg, Florida Consolidated Plan. Priority Needs

20 Edward Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Request Subdivision Variance (4.1 (m)(1) of the Subdivision Regulations) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

DOWNTOWN BEAUMONT CENTRE-VILLE: PARKING MANAGEMENT REPORT

Gardnerville Parking District Strategy

Summary and Background Mitco Investments, LLC controls Union Pacific Railroad right of way leases for two areas of ground:

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Service Plan

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

APPENDIX D: DEFINITIONS

SECTION 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS

To achieve growth, property development, redevelopment and an improved tax base in the cities and boroughs in the Lehigh Valley.

Delano Central Business District Parking Study and River Street Reconfiguration Concept

Downtown Parking Strategy. Final Report

MUNICIPAL PILOT AGREEMENTS IN NEW JERSEY

SECTION I - INTRODUCTION

The Miramar Santa Monica

Wesley Housing Development Corporation Trenton Street Residential

Part 4.0 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

DRAFT Housing Technical Bulletin

Section 7.22: Multifamily Assisted Housing in AA-30 Residential Zone (MAHZ) [Note: an additional line will be added to the Table in Article 3, 3.1.

74af ANTELOPE VALLEY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

2015 Planning and Zoning School Town of Hyde Park July 15, Site Plan Review and Special Use Permits

7. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

PARKING ON MAIN STREET A Nuts & Bolts Primer

PUBLIC NOTICE* Studies Requested: Parking analysis. Other Required Permits: Building Permit, Site Development Permit

SANTA ROSA IMPACT FEE PROGRAM UPDATE FINAL REPORT. May Robert D. Spencer, Urban Economics Strategic Economics Kittelson & Associates

CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK PLANNING BOARD JANUARY 25 TH 2019 MINUTES

Community Development Department Council Chambers, 7:30 PM, June 7, 2018

Town of Limon Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 4 HOUSING. Limon Housing Authority Affordable Housing

1 Application Form 4

Ashcroft Homes Trim Road Development Planning Rationale

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

Urban Redevelopment Through Adaptive Reuse: From Blight to Bright

Section 2: Themes and Strategies for Healthy Apartment Neighbourhoods By Design

Summary. Draft Redevelopment Plan Summary Flowery Branch Tax Allocation District # 1:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

City of Oakland Programs, Policies and New Initiatives for Housing

H-POLICY 1: Preserve and improve existing neighborhoods. Ensure that Prince William County achieves new neighborhoods with a high quality of life.

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

Transcription:

Main Street Parking Area Strategy Borough of South River Middlesex County, New Jersey Revised: July 3, 2018 DRAFT 7/3/2018 Page 1

Bignell Planning Consultants, Inc. 424 AMBOY AVENUE SUITE 202 WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095 PHONE: (732) 636-0200 FAX: (732) 218-5975 MAIL@BIGNELLPLANNING.COM July 3, 2018 Michael Beck, Chairperson South River Planning Board 5 Theresa Place South River, NJ 08882 Re: Borough of South River Planning Board Main Street Area Parking Strategy/Plan Proposed Master Plan Amendment Dear Sir: This office has been authorized to provide a Parking Strategy to be proposed as an Amendment to the Borough of South River Master Plan and offers the following planning comments for your consideration. 1. Why is a Main Street Area Parking Strategy Needed? As of the beginning of 2018, the Borough has seen several new development applications for mixed-use housing developments in or near the Main Street area. Elected officials have observed this building boom in residential apartment units and want to ensure that the Borough s parking policies will not act as an obstacle to re-development of the Borough s stock of buildings. Many residents and business owners believe there is a parking shortage in the Main Street area. Business owners express concern that convenient parking is not available for their customers. Commercial landlords believe potential tenants are reluctant to lease retail space if no convenient customer parking is perceived to be available. Residential and mixed-use developers often propose land-use applications which do not satisfy the Borough s RSIS-based parking standards. The physical layout of the Main Street area is over 100 years old. Development is constrained by irregular lots and a non-standard system of driveways and curb cuts. Many buildings were constructed before any parking requirements were in effect. The Borough also has unclear signage directing parkers to municipal lots and unclear signage and pathways connecting parking areas to retail/commercial uses. DRAFT 7/3/2018 Page 2

Purpose of a Main Street Area Parking Strategy Develop a comprehensive parking philosophy for the greater Main Street Area. Examine the Borough s existing parking policies, facilities and usage. Recommend policy and ordinance changes to realign the existing policies and procedures into a refocused parking philosophy. Develop a set of policy and ordinance recommendations to advance the goals of the refocused parking plan. Adopt this document as a Master Plan Amendment Some parking capacity does exist in the Main Street Area. The Borough owns a municipal parking lot on Obert Street and operates it through its municipal parking utility. (See image of Borough Parking Lot below.) That lot contains approximately 99 spaces separated into metered and permit stalls. An additional ±100 street parking meters existing on Main, Obert, Ferry, Washington and Stephen Streets. The Main Street area also contains several dozen irregular, unconnected. or isolated paved areas used as parking lots. Almost all of these isolated lots are privately owned. The Borough parking utility is an uncomplicated organization which does not employ any full-time employees or collect any data beyond accounting for revenue. It does not conduct long-range facilities planning. Rather, policies are established from historical operations and facilities are refurbished on an adhoc basis. Based on information provided by the Borough Finance Officer and the Borough Police Chief in early 2018, the Borough parking lot on Obert Street has current capacity for additional DRAFT 7/3/2018 Page 3

vehicles, however it is nearing a maximum historical capacity in terms of number of parking permits sold for this lot. While some limited bus service is available for residents, the Borough has poor linkages to mass transit. Where other communities with transit connections, shared parking facilities, or sizeable transit ridership have been able to adopt alternate (lower) parking standards, this would not be a realistic option for the Borough. Local parking is still needed at this time. A comprehensive parking strategy is needed. This Main Street Area Parking Strategy is proposed as that document. This strategy is intended to serve the Borough Council, Planning Board, Zoning Board, and Municipal Parking Utility as these entities make future policy decisions related to parking in the Borough of South River. 2. Parking demand varies throughout the day and by user, however most a cars spend 95% of their lifespan parked: Parking Need by Use: Typical Peak Parking Need: Residents Need all day and overnight parking. Would benefit from alternatives to individual auto use Businesses Need all day and late evening parking for employees and customers. Need convenient high-turnover spots for retail customers. Need short-term loading on a shared basis. Restaurants Need evening long-term parking for employees. Need evening short-term parking for customers. Special Events Need long-term weekend and evening. Schools, Houses of Worship Need all day parking for employees. Need long-term evening and weekend parking for events. Municipal Facilities Need all day parking for employees. Need long-term evening and weekend parking for events. 3. Where is the Main Street Parking Area? This area is intended to include all properties located within the Main Street Rehabilitation (MSR) Zoning and Waterfront Revitalization (WR) Districts, all properties located within any designated Area in Need of Redevelopment or Rehabilitation, and additional properties within a 5-minute walking distance to any of the above areas. DRAFT 7/3/2018 Page 4

4. Inventory and Locations of Borough Parking Facilities in the Main Street Area: Location: Metered Unmetered/Handicapped Main Borough parking lot on Obert Street 30 69 Main Street meters 46 3 Stephen Street meters 9 0 Ferry Street meters 23 0 Obert Street meters 3 0 Washington St meters between Ferry and Gordon 19 3 SUB-TOTAL: 130 75 Borough Office lot on Washington St 0 23 Washington/Jackson Lot 0 21 TOTAL: 130 119 Existing Borough Parking Facilities Street Parking Meters Municipal Lots DRAFT 7/3/2018 Page 5

5. Main Street Area Parking Strategy/Plan Goals: This Master Plan addendum is intended to promote the following objectives: A. To better coordinate the provision of conveniently-located public parking to serve all residents and businesses in the vicinity of the Main Street area, which should be available at some cost to the user. B. To ensure on-site parking requirements will not be an inhibitor to economic development or the revitalization of existing buildings and properties. C. To acknowledge that development proposals which do not provide on-site parking have relied on shared parking arrangements, which have created scattered parking lots throughout the area; or have relied on the purchase of a finite number of parking permits from the parking utility, which will one-day reach maximum capacity. D. To acknowledge the Borough has a number of municipal parking facilities which may one-day need to be expanded, and that new parking capacity will be needed. E. To recognize the capital costs of constructing new parking facilities, including land acquisition, will represent a substantial financial cost to the Borough in the future. F. To provide the basis for a municipal ordinance wherein, in lieu of requiring the construction of parking spaces on-site, both developers and the Borough could benefit from a mechanism permitting new parking spaces to be provided via contribution to a capital fund, and wherein such contributions would be combined to pay the costs of constructing or expanding municipal parking facilities under the coordination of the Borough of South River. G. To ensure that when parking permits are sold to a purchaser, that the parking utility has a policy in place to verify that a realistic opportunity for parking is available in a municipal lot. H. To provide guidelines for expansion of parking facilities and construction of new parking, so as to be available for future development applications which do not construct on-site parking. I. For the Borough to recapture the capital costs of constructing parking spaces that are lost when parking variances are granted. J. To provide for a policy preference to guide how and where parking should be provided in the area, as well as establishing a policy for how and where off-site parking should be provided during an Application for Development. DRAFT 7/3/2018 Page 6

6. The Main Street Parking Area Policy Recommendations: Principals to Guide Borough Leaders when making Decisions on Parking Issues: A. Overall Policy Vision 1. It should be the policy of the Borough to create new parking supply which should be located serve new and existing residents and businesses and be available (at some cost) to future developers seeking parking variances. 2. The Borough should maintain a traditional, walkable, downtown streetscape in the Main Street area, even if this means some buildings will provide no on-site parking. 3. Some Main Street area parcels will be difficult to re-develop because of the layout requirements for on-site parking, including access aisles, street connections, and driveways. These properties should still be rehabilitated or re-developed. The Borough should consider alternative ways to allow for parking to be provided off these sites and into one or more central parking facilities, for some fee. B. When Considering Parking Utility Policies 1. The Parking Utility should maintain a capital fund/trust fund strictly dedicated to the creation of new parking spaces, and should utilize parking revenues for regular maintenance, salaries, and operating expenses, etc. 2. The Borough should make future parking expansion decisions based on usage data collected from current lots, meters, permits and users. 2. The Parking Utility should conduct a once-a-year physical inspection of all parking facilities, lots, meters, and infrastructure and provide an annual report providing permit/user data, capacity data, and short and long-term maintenance needs and expansion goals. 3. The Parking Utility should adopt a permit limit policy to guide the number of parking permits sold relative to the number of parking spaces available. This should be between a 1-spaceto-1.75-permit or a 1-space-to-2.0-permit ratio, depending on the composition of permit purchasers. (Resident/Shopper/Commercial user, etc.) 4. The Parking Utility should consider adopting a color-code system on the permit/tag/sticker, etc. to easily identify which type of user is parking in the facility (Yellow: Residential, Red: Business, etc.) 5. Borough parking facilities should have sufficient capacity to accept new permit customers. However, when parking facilities approach 80%-90% capacity, the Borough should consider measures to use capital funds to create new parking capacity. 6. If data shows that parking facilities are nearing capacity, the Borough should consider expanding parking supply to provide greater convenience to users. The creation of new parking should come via expansion of existing facilities on Obert Street, and/or the consideration of new parking facilities elsewhere within the Main Street area. Development opportunities on the Obert Street facility may include surface expansion, acquisition of abutting parking lots, construction of a parking structure, or construction of a mixed-use building with ground level parking and upper-level occupied space. If other locations are considered for a new municipal lot, the guidelines below should be utilized. DRAFT 7/3/2018 Page 7

C. When Considering Future Municipal Parking Locations and Facilities: 1. New parking opportunity areas should be located in the Main Street area, designed to expand or connect to existing parking areas, alleys, access driveways, infrastructure, and pedestrian alleys. 2. No new parking lots or structures should be constructed to front on walkable streetscape areas including, but not limited to, Main Street or Ferry Street. 3. Parking should be located and/or accessed from rear lot locations such as from George Street, Stephen Street, Thomas Street, Obert Street or Washington Street, so as not to interrupt the retail viability and walkable tempo of Main Street/Ferry Street retail areas. 4. Parking should be wrapped, screened or covered by retail/ commercial or residential uses. 5. Surface or structured parking is acceptable in flood-prone areas generally east of Reid/Water Streets in combination with green infrastructure and stormwater management structures. 6. The Borough should consider new parking in locations where it can be developed into a Community Transportation Hub which includes car, bus, pedestrian and bicycle connections. Hubs should be located to provide access to the retail areas of Main within a ¼-mile (5 minute) walk. Available at these hubs could be: permit-based parking, shopper parking, bike sharing, car sharing, taxi services, and bus stops and shelters. 7. The Borough should utilize technology to modernize the parking payment systems, particularly in new facilities, to make it easier and more welcoming for residents and visitors to use and find parking when needed. Credit card payment should be available. Modern parking facilities are also becoming integrated into the smartphone user experience via several parking applications. The Borough should explore connecting meters to a smartphone application platform such as Parkmoblie or other commercially-available payment systems. This modernization should also consider keeping a number of coin-operated meters for technology-free customers. D. When Considering Parking Ordinances or Ordinance Revisions: 1. The Borough should consider an ordinance establishing a capital fund/trust fund and permitting developers or property owners to provide monetary contributions to this fund in lieu of providing on-site parking. 2. The ordinance should specify the geographic limits of the eligibility area. 3. The ordinance should provide a clear procedure for how monies in the fund are to be spent on the capital costs of buying and building and creating new parking spaces. 4. The ordinance should prohibit the use of capital funds to pay for Parking Utility salaries, operating costs, or regular maintenance. 5. The ordinance should provide a clear procedure for how development applications can utilize the provisions of the ordinance. 6. The ordinance should require that proposed capital improvements be referred to the Planning Board for a Capital Improvement Plan review. DRAFT 7/3/2018 Page 8

E. When Considering Parking Relief in Development Applications 1. Parking should be integrated into the ground level of development sites or new buildings whenever possible. 2. The Borough should have a clear priority order for developers and property owners to follow when parking cannot be provided on-site. This priority order should be: Priority 1: Provide on-site parking if/and wherever possible Priority 2: Provide off-site parking via contribution to a capital fund to construct new parking Priority 3: Provide off-site parking in a Borough parking facility via permit in perpetuity Priority 4: Provide off-site parking via contract in a private parking facility Priority 5: Rely on free-market purchase of meters/permit spaces F. When considering a Parking Capital Fund 1. The Borough should consider creating a capital fund dedicated to provide for, or defray the cost of, the creation of new parking facilities. 2. The Borough should allow developers to contribute to the capital fund in lieu of providing onsite parking. The Borough should spend the monies in the capital fund to create new parking facilities to support economic development. 3. The parking capital fund should be used solely for the capital costs of building new parking infrastructure, including parking lot engineering and design; parking and feasibility studies; land acquisition, construction or erection of parking structures; installation of parking new equipment, parking lighting, parking drainage, parking landscaping, parking utilities, parking communications or security equipment; closing costs resulting from property acquisition; and similar capital project costs directly associated with the development of new municipal parking infrastructure. The parking capital fund should not be used to pay operating expenses, employee salaries, or parking infrastructure maintenance costs budgeted or incurred by the Parking Utility. 4. When expenditures are proposed from the capital fund, they should advance this goals of the Borough Master Plan, and should be referred to the Planning Board using the procedures provided in N.J.S.A. 40:55D-31 for a Capital Improvement review. DRAFT 7/3/2018 Page 9