ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING BOARD

ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Referrals for Review at the; Coordinated Review Committee Meeting November 7, 2017 at 3:30pm County Planning Board Meeting November 8 at 7:30pm 2nd Floor Conference Room, Room 200, 20 Ontario Street, Canandaigua, NY 14424 - Telephone: 585-396-4455 Referral No Municipality Referring Board Applicant Application Type Class Page 207-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Schottenstein Property Management Site Plan 208-2017 Town of Gorham Town Board Bagley, John Map Amendment 2 209-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board T-Mobile Northest LLC Special Use Permit 1 209.1-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board T-Mobile Northest LLC Site Plan 1 210-2017 Town of Richmond Planning Commission Town of Richmond Local Law 2 211-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Conifer Realty LLC Site Plan 2 211.1-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Conifer Realty LLC Subdivision 2 212-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Marathon Engineering Site Plan 2 212.1-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Marathon Engineering Area Variance 2 212.2-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Marathon Engineering Subdivision 2 213-2017 Town of Farmington Zoning Board of Appeals Priggon, Paul and Lynda Area Variance 1 214-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Benderson Development Co LLC ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 1 AR-1 Site Plan 1 215-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board T Mobile Northeast Site Plan 1 215.1-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board T Mobile Northeast Special Use Permit 1 216-2017 Town of Richmond Zoning Board of Appeals Larrick, Linda Suzanne Area Variance AR-2 217-2017 Town of Richmond Zoning Board of Appeals Carrier, Nicolas Special Use Permit 1 218-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC (AT&T) Special Use Permit 1 219-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board MSinkler Ent. LLC Special Use Permit 1 219.1-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board MSinkler Ent. LLC Site Plan 1 220-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board The Victor Apple Farm LLC Site Plan 1 221-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board Venezia Associates Site Plan 1 222-2017 Town of Canandaigua Planning Board Ship, Daniel and Bronwyn Subdivision 1 222.1-2017 Town of Canandaigua Zoning Board of Appeals Ship, Daniel and Bronwyn Area Variance 1 223-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board Genecco, Sarah Special Use Permit AR-1 224-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board harris-maxwell, j Area Variance AR-2 224.1-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board harris-maxwell, j Site Plan AR-2 225-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board McMillan, Martin Site Plan 225.1-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board McMillan, Martin Special Use Permit 226-2017 City of Canandaigua Town Board Howard Hanna Use Variance 227-2017 Town of South Bristol Planning Board Fields Enterprises Inc Site Plan AR-1 228-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Cynthia Cherichella Subdivision Withdrawn Withdrawn Withdrawn 1 late referral 228.1 2017 Town of Farmington Zoning Board of Appeals Cynthia Cherichella Area Variance 1 late referral

207-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Class: AR-1 Referral Type: Representative: Tax Map No(s): Brief Description: Site Plan Schottenstein Property Management APD Engineering & Architecture 1.02-1-8.000/plza Site Plan application for replacement of dumpster enclosure behind front building at Cobblestone Court (K- Mart Plaza) on the north side of SR 96 in the Town of Victor. Comments The demo plan indicates removal of a catch basin in the existing blacktop parking area but plans do not indicate how to maintain positive drainage flow and connections to existing drainage outside the disturbed area. Policy AR-4: Use of existing facilities fora permitted use with no expansion of the building or paved area. Applications involving only the use of existing facilities for a permitted use with no expansion of the building or paved area have been determined by this Board to be a category of referrals with no potential countywide or inter-municipal impact. Applications for specially permitted uses or the addition of drive through service are not covered under this policy and will require full board review. Final classification shall be Class 1 Findings: 1. Applications addressed by this policy propose no new development. 2. Applications addressed by this policy include only permitted uses. 3. Such applications present little potential for countywide or intermunicipal impact. Final Recommendation - The CPB will make no formal recommendation on applications involving only the use of existing facilities for a permitted use with no expansion of the building or paved area (Class 1). 208-2017 Town of Gorham Town Board Class: 2 Referral Type: Map Amendment Bagley, John Tax Map No(s): 144.10-2-59.000 144.10-2-58.000 Brief Description: Map amendment and local law to re-zone 2 parcels at 4733 and 4735 South Street in the Town of Gorham from Hamlet Commercial to Hamlet Residential. This action continues to allow single-family, two-family, and multi-family use and a range of small scale commercial and public uses but not more intensive commercial uses such as car washes, contractor yards, hotel, or motor vehicle service station. 209-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Property Owner: Tax Map No(s): Brief Description: Special Use Permit T-Mobile Northeast LLC T. Victor land/ontario County - tower 15.00-2-74.000/TMB Site Plan and Special Permit application to Town of Victor to replace panel antennas and amplifiers without changing their physical dimensions on an existing tower at 701 High Street. Because the Town of Victor requires a special use permit, this routine upgrading of antennas and other equipment is not covered under Administrative Review Policy 8 regarding co-location of equipment on existing towers. The referral includes documentation of consent from the tower owner, Ontario County, and completion of studies assuring the structure is capable of supporting the new equipment and it will not interfere with County tower use. ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 2

209.1-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Property Owner: Tax Map No(s): Brief Description: Site Plan T-Mobile Northeast LLC T. Victor land/ontario County - tower 15.00-2-74.000/TMB Site Plan and Special Permit application to Town of Victor to replace panel antennas and amplifiers without changing their physical dimensions on an existing tower at 701 High Street. See Referral 209-2017 for project summary and comments. 210-2017 Town of Richmond Planning Commission Class: 2 Referral Type: Brief Description: Local Law Town of Richmond Local law amendement to define event center and allow as specially permitted use in Residential/Recreation district in the Town of Richmond. Residential/Recreation district currently mapped in areas adjacent to Ontario County towns of Canadice and South Bristol and Livingston County towns of Lima and Livonia. Existing Special Permit Uses in the Residential/Recreation district are: 1. Profit and non-profit recreation areas 2. Sawmills 3. Essential services 4. Commercial broadcast and commercial personal wireless service towers and antennas 5. Campgrounds 6. Excavation and Mining 211-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Class: 2 Referral Type: Site Plan Conifer Realty LLC Property Owner: DiFelice Lands LLC Representative: Marathon Engineering Tax Map No(s): 41.07-1--28.400 41.07-1-28.200 Brief Description: Referral for site plan and subdivision review for 112 apartments at Pintail Crossing proposed by Conifer Development on Quentonshire Drive south of CR 41 and east of 332 in the Town of Farmington. Click below to access site plan for 211-2017 on the Ontario County website document center. http://www.co.ontario.ny.us/documentcenter/view/12182 Conifer Development will purchase 15.9 acres for the development of Pintail Crossing. The concept plan has been substantially redesigned since the re-zoning referral reviewed in August 2017 (#164-2017). The first 640 feet of roadway will be Quentonshire Drive, a dedicated Town of Farmington Road; the proposed bus loop is off this road. The site plan replaces the interconnected parking areas with a driveway which will be a private road providing access to parking areas with internal circulation as well as limited parking with direct access from driveway. There will be a gated emergency connection to Running Brook Road. There is a walking trail around the 1 acre community green, sidewalks throughout the complex, and cross walks shown by the Community Building and at the east end of the community green. The proposed apartment complex has been reduced from 15 buildings with 120 units to 14 buildings with 112 units grouped around 6 parking areas each with its own dumpster. Each building has 8 apartments and the plan now includes 3 buildings of three-bedroom units not just 2, while reducing the number of one- and two-bedroom buildings by 1. Phase 1 includes buildings around the first 4 parking areas: 1 two-bedroom building, 2 one-bedroom buildings, and a community building and playground around a parking area to the east of the entry drive; 2 three-bedroom and 1 two-bedroom building around a parking area to the south of the driveway across from the ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 3

playground, and; 4 two-bedroom buildings around 2 parking areas to the south of the driveway. Phase 2 includes a three-bedroom and a one-bedroom building with an associated parking area to the south of the driveway and parking along the eastern end of the driveway 2 two-bedroom buildings and associated parking to the north of the driveway at the eastern end of the site 2 two-bedroom buildings served by a parking area north of the driveway along the east side of the community green. There are now two stormwater management areas along the southern property boundary adjacent to existing single-family homes. The ponds are surrounded by split rail fence with mesh screening. At the Town of Farmington Project Review Committee meeting on November 3, 2017 the applicant stated the project site traffic generation does not reach the threshold to require a traffic study and acknowledged need to provide details on intersection controls and other internal signage. Comments 1. The site plan does not show plans for adjacent lands owned by the current land owner. The site plan shows a bus loop to be developed by RTS and an access to connect to remaining lands of DiFelice. Documentation of RTS s willingness to construct the bus loop and additional details regarding the cross access easement should be provided. 2. What signage will be installed to ensure safe passage of children from the area of three-bedroom units across the driveway to the playground? 3. Only some of the buildings have adjacent designated accessible parking. 4. The drainage easement shown on the subdivision plan should also be shown on the site plan. August 2017 COMMENTS: Given the high volume of residential and commercial development currently occurring/ being reviewed by the Town along the SR 332 corridor, does the existing public water and sewer infrastructure have the capacity to support the proposed development? Per applicant representation, the proposed project will loop the water coming off of CR 41 through the Running Brook development back to CR 41. August 2017 OCDPW COMMENTS: A County highway work permit will be required for this project. In addition, we ve the following comments: 1. Will the projected traffic from this proposed project represent at least five percent (5%) of the CR 41 & Quentonshire Drive intersection volume? If the projected traffic is 5% or higher a more detailed TIS may be required. a. Per applicant representation, a TIS is not required right now given the traffic volume, but the applicant is willing to look into providing one if the Town deems it necessary. 2. What are the proposed traffic control measures at the CR 41 & Quentonshire Drive intersection? 3. Explain why project road network will not connect into Running Brook Road. a. Per applicant representation, the Town did not want the connection to be made, however the Town is requiring an emergency vehicle road to be sited between Quentonshire and Running Brook. 4. Provide drainage study for our review. August 2017 NYSDOT COMMENTS (Greg Trost): The site plan shows this project empties onto County Rd. 41, which then ties into Route 332. It also shows 120 proposed units. NYSDOT has no issues with what s being proposed with the Conifer Apartment project as shown. According to ONCOR: No State or Federal wetlands are present on the property. The property not located within a FEMA floodplain. The property is not located within 500 ft. of an Agricultural District. Soil Characteristics Type: Odessa Silt loam Slope: 0 to 3 percent Soil permeability: Moderately Low Erodibility: Very High Soil Characteristics Type: Lakemont silty clay loam ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 4

Slope: 0 to 3 percent Soil permeability: Moderately Low Erodibility: Very High August 2017 CRC MEETING COMMENTS: The referring board is encouraged to require full parcel planning. The applicant should provide plans that detail the potential for expanded use on the property so that the full extent of any impacts can be determined/ mitigated. All representations made by the applicant s engineer should be reflected on an updated site plan. August 2017 CPB MEETING COMMENTS: In addition to the comments listed above; The referring board is encouraged to require the applicant to provide phasing details relative to the project to ensure the necessary infrastructure is installed within the first phase of construction. A performance bond may want to be considered to ensure the entire facility can be constructed as represented. The referring board is encouraged to require the applicant to provide a traffic study that shows the impact of the proposed development on the already existing traffic created by the neighboring development. The study should take into account the traffic created by other developments along 332 that have recently been presented to the Town, but may not yet be under construction. The referring board is strongly encouraged to evaluate the future use of this area in the Town and make sure this is the use best suited for the area, given the Town s priorities identified in their Comprehensive Plan. Emergency access from the adjoining neighborhood should be maintained year round. 211.1-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Class: 2 Referral Type: Subdivision Conifer Realty LLC Property Owner: DiFelice Lands LLC Representative: Marathon Engineering Tax Map No(s): 41.07-1--28.400 41.07-1-28.200 Brief Description: Referral for site plan and subdivision review for 112 apartments at Pintail Crossing proposed by Conifer Development on Quentonshire Drive south of CR 41 and east of 332 in the Town of Farmington. See referral 211-2017 for project summary and comments. 212-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Class: 2 Referral Type: Site Plan Marathon Engineering Tax Map No(s): 29.11-3-14 Brief Description: Referral for site plan, area variances, and subdivision plan for development of a Microtel and a Taco Bell on 2 parcels sudivided out from the 3.92 acre KFC parcel at 1301 SR 332 on the east side south of SR 96. Click below to access the layout and subdivision plan on the Ontario County website document center. http://www.co.ontario.ny.us/documentcenter/view/12185 http://www.co.ontario.ny.us/documentcenter/view/12186 The 2 new lots will be developed using the existing KFC access drive off SR 332. The Taco Bell will be a 2,100 square feet one-story building including a drive-thru with 8 queuing spaces and 63 parking spaces on a 1.18 acre lot. There will also be a small outdoor seating area abutting the access drive. The Microtel will provide 60 rooms in a 3 story building with a height of approximately 42 feet. This lot has 44 parking spaces and a lot size of 1.288 acres. The development as proposed required 8 variances. These variances are based on a future subdivision of the 3.92 Acre KFC parcel to accommodate the proposed Taco Bell and Microtel Hotel on separate lots. The variances being requested are: Parking spaces: proposed 140 parking spaces when 191 spaces are required by code Side setback for Taco Bell: proposed 22 ft. when 30 ft. is required. Will not move the proposed building over to meet the side setback requirement due to the potential loss of a parking space. Lot width for Taco Bell parcel (in regards to lot frontage): proposed 15 ft. when 150 ft. is required Access Road setback for Taco Bell: proposed 20 ft. when 50 ft. is required ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 5

Draft November 7. 2017 CRC Agenda Town Law 280a: By Town Code a parcel must have direct access to a mapped street. The proposed Taco Bell will have access provided via permanent easement. Lot width for Microtel Hotel parcel (in regards to lot frontage): proposed 15 ft. when 150 ft. is required Access Road setback for Microtel Hotel: proposed 20 ft. when 50 ft. is required Town Law 280a: By Town Code a parcel must have direct access to a mapped street. The proposed Microtel Hotel will have access provided via permanent easement. As reported at the 11/3/17 Farmington Project Review Committee the potential federal wetland located in the NW corner of the site is not a jurisdictional wetland. Comments: The layout plan does not incorporate dedicated left turn exit lane to mitigate failing movements at AM and PM peak hours when site is fully developed as outlined in letter from NYSDOT to Marathon dated August 9, 2017. The extent of the access easement off SR 332 shown on the subdivision plan is not show on layout plan. The layout plan indicates access easements to the south along the SR 332 frontage by KFC and to the east along the southern property line of the Microtel parcel. Development of each roadway would reduce the number of parking spaces by two and these easements are not shown on the subdivision plan. Furthermore the easement to the east overlaps a 20 sewer easement not shown on the layout plan. The 20 pedestrian easement on the north side of the Microtel lot on the subdivision plan is not shown on the layout plan. Consider extending Lot 3 north to include more parking on Lot 2 with Taco Bell because such parking is likely to be used by Microtel guests. The referral does not include details about the new pylon sign. Will a signage variance be needed? Lighting plan shows light spill of 2 FC at the southern property boundary. Landscape quantities on the chart don t seem to match those shown on the plan. Given the height and quantity of light poles (twenty feet poles) and trees (8 maples, 4 each plane and pear, 2 crabapple, and 3 dogwoods) the character of the site will be dominated by lighting not landscaping. The layout plan notes say Microtel is 3 stories, the elevations shown are for a 2 and 4-story building. The Town is encouraged to grant the minimum variances necessary. According to ONCOR: There is a Federal wetland on the northwest portion of the property. The parcel is not located within FEMA floodplain. The property is not located within 500ft of an Agricultural District. Soil Characteristics o Type: Kendaia loam (14%) o Slope: 0 to 3 percent o Soil permeability: Moderately High o Erodibility: Medium Soil Characteristics o Type: Ovid silt loam (86%) o Slope: 0 to 3 percent o Soil permeability: Moderately High o Erodibility: High Section 280 of Town Law 4. The town board may, by resolution, establish an open development area or areas within the town, wherein permits may be issued for the erection of structures to which access is given by right of way or easement, upon such conditions and subject to such limitations as may be prescribed by general or special rule of the planning board, if one exists, or of the town board if a planning board does not exist. If a planning board exists in such town, the town board, before establishing any such open development area or areas, shall refer the matter to such planning board for its advice and shall allow such planning board a reasonable time to report. 5. For the purposes of this section the word "access" shall mean that the plot on which such structure is proposed to be erected directly abuts on such street or highway and has sufficient frontage thereon to allow the ingress and egress of fire trucks, ambulances, police cars and other emergency vehicles, and, a frontage of fifteen feet shall ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 6

presumptively be sufficient for that purpose. The use of cross access easements for the development of these sites would eliminate a number of variances. The Town is encouraged to consider how access agreements could be utilized in place of 15 foot access outlined on a subdivision map that doesn t represent actual access to these parcels in reality (per referral documents existing drive will remain as is, 3 different driveways will not be developed). July 2017 NYSDOT Comments I believe a traffic study would be needed to make sure the current driveway can handle the volume. We also discussed a possible connection to the property to the south. That would be something we would support if the Town required it. (The property to the south had submitted preliminary plans for a Becker Wood Buildings sales lot.) There is sidewalk work shown to occur on that stretch of Route 332, with a portion of it to be in the State right-of-way. I spoke with the developer and let him know when he was ready to do that work, a permit would be required. This could be incorporated with any driveway work, due to future traffic volumes, if the traffic study supports it, if that is deemed necessary. 212.1-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Class: 2 Referral Type: Area Variance Marathon Engineering Tax Map No(s): 29.11-3-14 Brief Description: Referral for site plan, area variances, and subdivision plan for development of a Microtel and a Taco Bell on 2 parcels sudivided out from the 3.92 acre KFC parcel at 1301 SR 332 on the east side south of SR 96. See referral 212-2017 for project summary and comments. 212.2-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Class: 2 Referral Type: Subdivision Marathon Engineering Tax Map No(s): 29.11-3-14 Brief Description: Referral for site plan, area variances, and subdivision plan for development of a Microtel and a Taco Bell on 2 parcels with 3.92 acres on the east side of SR 332 south of SR 96 by KFC. See referral 212-2017 for project summary and comments. 213-2017 Town of Farmington Zoning Board of Appeals Class: 1 Referral Type: Area Variance Priggon, Paul and Lynda Tax Map No(s): 8.00-1-27.000 Brief Description: Referral for front and side variances to construct a two car garage and breezeway at residence at 705 Farmington Road. Small corner of the lot by the proposed garage is in the Town of Farmington; remainder in Town of Macedon. Required variances in the Town of Farmington include an 18 foot variance from the 50 foot front setback requirement and a 12 foot variance from the 15 foot side setback requirement. 214-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Site Plan Benderson Development Co LLC Tax Map No(s): 6.04-1-78.000 Brief Description: Site plan application to add 18x32 patio behind building where 1 of 3 spaces is occupied by Chipotle for new tenant, Pi Pizza, at Victor Crossing north of SR 96 in the Town of Victor. The approved Victor Crossing site plan shows a 6,994 sq.ft. building. The applicant is seeking minor modifications in conjunction ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 7

with leasing 2,100 sq.ft at the northern portion of the building. This leaves 1,425 sq.ft. of vacant space. The modifications include: 1. A 576 sq.ft. patio and access door to the eastern side of the building which will be surrounded by a decorative 4 fence and landscaping. 2. The relocation of the dumpster that is currently behind the building to a location behind 5 Guys where two other dumpsters are currently located. 3. The addition of code-compliant signage for Pi Pizza on the eastern and western elevations of the building 4. The site plan modifications do not result in any impact to setbacks, greenspace, or overall permitted building square feet. 215-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Property Owner: Representative: Tax Map No(s): Brief Description: Site Plan T Mobile Northeast RKH Golf LLC Damon, Barclay 16.00-1-42.211/CRWN Site plan and special use permit application to add antenna, cables, and related ground equipment to existing communications tower at 914 Brownsville Road in the Town of Victor. Because the Town of Victor requires a special use permit, adding antennas and other equipment to this existing tower is not covered under Administrative Review Policy 8 regarding co-location of equipment on existing towers. The referral includes documentation of consent from T-Mobile for tower owner Crown Castle to apply for permits and completion of studies assuring the structure is capable of supporting the proposed equipment. 215.1-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Property Owner: Representative: Tax Map No(s): Brief Description: Special Use Permit T Mobile Northeast RKH Golf LLC Damon, Barclay 16.00-1-42.211/CRWN Site plan and special use permit application to add antenna, cables, and related ground equipment to existing communications tower at 914 Brownsville Road in the Town of Victor. See referral 215-2017 for project summary and comments. 216-2017 Town of Richmond Zoning Board of Appeals Class: AR-2 Referral Type: Area Variance Larrick, Linda Suzanne Tax Map No(s): 150.17-1-13.120 Brief Description: Area variance for 420 sq.ft. deck at 5272 Cottage Cove on the east side of Honeoye Lake in the Town of Richmond. Referred because within 500' of Agricultural District. Deck requires a 28.2 foot variance for location closer than 50 feet from the front/lake lot line. Policy AR-5: Applications involving one single family residential site, including home occupations. The intent of this policy is to: - Address residential development that may infringe on County ROW s or easements for roads and other infrastructure. - Address traffic safety along intermunicipal corridors by encouraging proper placement of residential driveways along County roads. - Address impacts to ground and surface waters B. The following applies to all development on parcels with lake frontage that require; variance pertaining to lot coverage variances pertaining to side yard setbacks or, ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 8

variance pertaining to lake shore setbacks Draft November 7. 2017 CRC Agenda The CPB s role of reviewing and making recommendations on county wide development has provided a unique perspective on the trend of more intensive development and use of lakefront lots. Of particular concern are the incremental negative impacts to water quality and the character of our lakefront neighborhoods. The following policy is a result of discussion and debate spanning 18 months as well as consultation with outside agencies directly involved with water quality issues in Ontario County. The intent is to address over development of lakefront lots and support the clearly stated interest by local decision makers to do the same. Final Classification: 2 Findings: 1. Protection of water features is a stated goal of the CPB. 2. The Finger Lakes are an indispensable part of the quality of life in Ontario County. 3. Increases in impervious surface lead to increased runoff and pollution. 4. Runoff from lakefront development is more likely to impact water quality. 5. It is the position of this Board that the legislative bodies of lakefront communities have enacted setbacks and limits on lot coverage that allow reasonable use of lakefront properties. 6. Protection of community character, as it relates to tourism, is a goal of the CPB. 7. It is the position of this Board that numerous variances can allow over development of properties in a way that negatively affects public enjoyment of the Finger Lakes and overall community character. 8. It is the position of this Board that such incremental impacts have a cumulative impact that is of countywide and intermunicipal significance. Final Recommendation: Denial 217-2017 Town of Richmond Zoning Board of Appeals Class: 1 Referral Type: Special Use Permit Carrier, Nicolas Tax Map No(s): 149.00-1-87.131 Brief Description: Special Use Permit application for a 14 x 80 addition to an existing 32 x 80 pole barn to provide an area for pitching instructing at 9056 Howcroft Road which runs between CR 37 and Curtis Road in the Town of Richmond. Rural residential lot is adjacent to an Agricultural District. The applicant currently operates a sports school with instruction available by appointment on a lot zoned Residential-Agricultural (A) and adjacent to an Agricultural District. The proposed addition will add an area for pitching instruction. 218-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Special Use Permit New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC (AT&T) Property Owner: Global Signal Acquitisons LLC/PMB 331 Representative: Centerline Communications LLC Tax Map No(s): 1402-1-6.200/TWR Brief Description: Special use permit application to replace antenna panels on an existing tower at 795 Old Dutch Road. Lot backs to Lehigh Crossing in the Town of Victor. Because the Town of Victor requires a special use permit, adding antennas to this existing tower is not covered under Administrative Review Policy 8 regarding co-location of equipment on existing towers. The referral includes documentation of consent from the tower owner, Crown Castle, and completion of studies assuring the structure is capable of supporting the proposed equipment. 219-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Special Use Permit MSinkler Ent. LLC Property Owner: Kay-John Properties, inc. Tax Map No(s): 15.00-2-22.120 ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 9

Brief Description: Draft November 7. 2017 CRC Agenda Application for a special use permit and site plan to allow outdoor storage of 3 cars for sale in conjunction with office lease at Cedar Hollow, 7355 SR 96 near India House Restaurant in the Town of V ictor. Applicant s business model involves advertising stocked vehicles on-line and meeting potential purchasers by appointment. Proposed signage includes a building mounted business sign and required NYS Department of Motor Vehicles sign. Comments: Will all vehicles be licensed/registered? 219.1-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Site Plan MSinkler Ent. LLC Property Owner: Kay-John Properties, inc. Tax Map No(s): 15.00-2-22.120 Brief Description: Application for a special use permit and site plan to allow outdoor storage of 3 cars for sale in conjunction with office lease at Cedar Hollow, 7355 SR 96 near India House Restaurant in the Town of V ictor. See referral 219-2017 for project summary and comments. 220-2017 Town of Victor Planning Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Site Plan The Victor Apple Farm LLC Property Owner: Pick Your Own Inc (same Family) Tax Map No(s): 39.00-1-23.000 Brief Description: Site plan application to operate a temporary 16'x30' store in existing storage and production building and to locate a 8'x16' mobile kitchen adjacent to the building at 1640 SR 444 in the Town of Victor. It appears this site plan application covers existing activities. The mobile kitchen is approved by NYS Department of Health. Waste water will utilize an existing, engineer approved septic system and water supply will use an existing public water connection. The applicant is in the process of developing a permanent plan to remodel a section of the storage and production building to permanently house the retail store in space that complies with current commercial code. 221-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Site Plan Venezia Associates Property Owner: Canandaigua County Club Tax Map No(s): 98.00-1-39.111 Brief Description: Site Plan application to show relocation of 2 existing accessory sheds outside of Special Flood Hazard Area and beyond limits of stream setback and to document location of event tent concrete pad, paver patio and walkways, and utility building at Canandaigua Country Club in the Town of Canandaigua. The 4,338 sq.ft. utility barn and the 3,200 sq.ft. event tent will remain within the required 100 stream buffer but meet all relevant requirements for zoning and building purposes. 222-2017 Town of Canandaigua Zoning Board of Appeals Class: 1 Referral Type: Subdivision Ship, Daniel and Bronwyn Property Owner: same Tax Map No(s): 57.00-1-24.151 Brief Description: Subdivision and variance application to create lot in Agricultural District at 4720 North Road in the Town of Canandiagua The subdivision with requested variance would allocate 20 feet of the 833 foot North Road frontage and 55.2 acres of the 64.1 acres ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 10

to Lot 1, which encompasses the existing residence and outbuildings. This lot would therefore require a 130 foot lot width variance. Lot 2 would have 813 feet of road frontage and 8.945 acres. According to ONCOR: 1. No State or Federal wetlands are presently on the property 2. The property is not location within a FEMA floodplain. 3. The property is located in an Agricultural District 4. Soil characteristics: Schoharie Silty Clay loam 3 to 8 percent slope 36.3 acres Permeability: Moderately High Erodibility: Very High Farmland Importance: All areas are Prime Farmland Cayuga Silt Loam 3 to 8 percent slope 9.5 acres Permeability: Moderately High Erodibility: Very High Farmland Importance: All areas are Prime Farmland Schoharie Silty Clay loam 3 to 8 percent 36.4 acres Permeability: Moderately High Erodibility: Very High Farmland Importance: Not prime farmland Comments: The referring agency and applicant are encouraged to: 1. Find ways to minimize the number of curb cuts by sharing driveways or providing cross access between the parcels. 2. Encouraged to ensure that any required soil percolation tests are completed and considered during subdivision review. 3. Involve all appropriate agencies as early in the review process as possible to ensure proper design and placement of on-site septic and curb cuts. 4. Consult with the Ontario County Highway Department and ensure that the sight distances for the proposed driveway comply with applicable design standards. 5. To involve the Ontario County Soil and Water Conservation District as early in the review process as possible to ensure proper design and implementation of storm water and erosion control measures. Additional Comments 6. Local board should request information on area agricultural infrastructure, as required by local subdivision law section 174-13C(4)(a)[10],and consider the likely impact of the subdivision on area farm viability as a result of changes in access, drainage, or other factors. 7. Local board should consider how this subdivision impacts access to remaining farmland associated with Lot 1. 8. Since applicant is proposing to reduce road frontage of parent parcel by more than 50%, local board should require applicant to follow conservation subdivision requirements as outlined in local subdivision code section 174-16 9. Please be aware that conversion of land to a non-agricultural use that is enrolled in the Agricultural Assessment Program is subject to conversion penalty. The payment for conversion will be equal to five times the taxes saved in the most recent year that the land received an agricultural assessment. In addition, interest of 6 percent per year compounded annually will be added to the payment. Ontario County Agricultural Enhancement Board Comments: 1. The 63 acre Ship parcel adjoins large tracts of high quality farmland in this part of Canandaigua. (See map.) 2. Agriculture Infrastructure: T. Canandaigua Subdivision regulations require agricultural infrastructure be mapped. https://ecode360.com/15756512 Location of surface and subsurface agricultural drainage infrastructure, existing farm equipment laneways, equipment access points to farm fields and public roads, etc. need to be shown. 3. Access to Lot 1 - Is the 20 access easement to the residence also to be used as access for agricultural equipment? Is that easement of sufficient width to allow movement of emergency equipment, equipment to access the various pipelines running across the property, and farm equipment? 4. Though proposed as a simple subdivision, it is apparent that Lot 2 (9 acres) is creating the potential for up to 9 residential lots depending if the Town includes or excludes land that is encumbered with a natural gas easement is included. 5. Fragmentation of farmland with large lot zoning in rural agricultural areas poses the most serious threat to maintaining viable agriculture in Ontario County. It introduces residential land uses that are incompatible with farm practices (noise, dust, odors, etc.) and can raise the operational cost of working land to the point that it becomes economically no longer viable to farm. The current zoning for the high quality agricultural land that is in place in this part of the Town is not agriculturally friendly to maintain the agricultural land base in northeastern Canandaigua. ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 11

6. The Ship parcel is located with the Town s Strategic Farmland Protection Area as delineated in their Agricultural Enhancement Plan. 222.1-2017 Town of Canandaigua Zoning Board of Appeals Class: 1 Referral Type: Area Variance Ship, Daniel and Bronwyn Property Owner: same Tax Map No(s): 57.00-1-24.151 Brief Description: Subdivision and variance application to create lot in Agricultural District at 4720 North Road in the Town of Canandiagua See referral 222-2017 for project summary and comments. 223-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board Class: AR-1 Referral Type: Special Use Permit Genecco, Sarah Property Owner: same Tax Map No(s): 98.08-1-12.000 Brief Description: Special use permit for 2 conforming signs for new restaurant at 3255 SR 64, former Schoooner s site, in the Town of Canandaigua. Policy AR-7: Signage The County Planning Board has long taken an interest in supporting local efforts to limit excessive signage. The Board has identified SR 64 as a primary travel corridor for tourists visiting Ontario County. The intent is to protect the character of development along these corridors by encouraging local boards to adhere to their adopted laws as much as possible. B. Applications for signs complying with local limits on size and number. Final Classification: Class 1 Findings 1. Signs that comply with local dimensional requirements will have the minimal practical level of impact on community character. Final Recommendation: The CPB will make no formal recommendation to deny or approve applications for signs that comply with local limits on size and or number. 224-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board Class: AR-2 Referral Type: Area Variance harris-maxwell, j Property Owner: Cooney, Susan Tax Map No(s): 98.09-1-10.00 Brief Description: Area variance and site plan approval for 2,500 sq.ft addition to residence at 4941 Island Beach Drive. This parcel is bisected by a 14 foot wide private ROW that provides access to the parcel and several lots to the south. The Town has determined the front setback will be calculated from this line. The proposed addition requires a 53.33 ft. front setback variances as the proposed house will be only 1.67 feet from the ROW not 55 feet as required. The existing house footprint is 9.5 feet from the ROW. The proposed addition requires a 6.3 foot side setback variance from the 10 feet required. The existing house footprint is 6.3 feet from the side lot line. The proposed addition will not exceed building or lot coverage limits. Policy AR-5: Applications involving one single family residential site, including home occupations. The intent of this policy is to: - Address residential development that may infringe on County ROW s or easements for roads and other infrastructure. - Address traffic safety along intermunicipal corridors by encouraging proper placement of residential driveways along County roads. ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 12

- Address impacts to ground and surface waters B. The following applies to all development on parcels with lake frontage that require; variances pertaining to lot coverage, or variances pertaining to side yard setbacks or, variance pertaining to lake shore setbacks Draft November 7. 2017 CRC Agenda The CPB s role of reviewing and making recommendations on county wide development has provided a unique perspective on the trend of more intensive development and use of lakefront lots. Of particular concern are the incremental negative impacts to water quality and the character of our lakefront neighborhoods. The following policy is a result of discussion and debate spanning 18 months as well as consultation with outside agencies directly involved with water quality issues in Ontario County. The intent is to address over development of lakefront lots and support the clearly stated interest by local decision makers to do the same. Final Classification: 2 Findings: 1. Protection of water features is a stated goal of the CPB. 2. The Finger Lakes are an indispensable part of the quality of life in Ontario County. 3. Increases in impervious surface lead to increased runoff and pollution. 4. Runoff from lakefront development is more likely to impact water quality. 5. It is the position of this Board that the legislative bodies of lakefront communities have enacted setbacks and limits on lot coverage that allow reasonable use of lakefront properties. 6. Protection of community character, as it relates to tourism, is a goal of the CPB. 7. It is the position of this Board that numerous variances can allow over development of properties in a way that negatively affects public enjoyment of the Finger Lakes and overall community character. 8. It is the position of this Board that such incremental impacts have a cumulative impact that is of countywide and intermunicipal significance. Kevin Olvany Comments: A more defined sequence of construction along with detailed erosion/sediment control methods on the plan would be recommended. Final Recommendation: Denial 224.1-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board Class: AR-2 Referral Type: Site Plan harris-maxwell, j Property Owner: Cooney, Susan Tax Map No(s): 98.09-1-10.00 Brief Description: Area variance and site plan approval for 2,500 sq.ft addition to residence at 4941 Island Beach Drive. See referral 224-2017 for project description and comments. 225-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board Class: Withdrawn Referral Type: Site Plan McMillan, Martin Tax Map No(s): 84.00-1-38.000 Brief Description: Site plan and special use permit for Mudslingers coffe drive-through at 3134 CR 10 in the Town of Canandaigua. 225.1-2017 Town of Canandaigua Town Board Class: Withdrawn Referral Type: Special Use Permit McMillan, Martin Tax Map No(s): 84.00-1-38.000 ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 13

Brief Description: Draft November 7. 2017 CRC Agenda Site plan and special use permit for Mudslingers coffe drive-through at 3134 CR 10 in the Town of Canandaigua. 226-2017 City of Canandaigua Town Board Class: Withdrawn Referral Type: Use Variance Howard Hanna Representative: Brugg, Betsy Tax Map No(s): 70.20-1-8 Brief Description: Use variance to add 1,000 sq.ft addition to pre-existing non-conforming office use in former residential building in residential district. 227-2017 Town of South Bristol Planning Board Class: AR-1 Referral Type: Site Plan Fields Enterprises Inc Property Owner: same Representative: Tyskiewicz, Tim Tax Map No(s): 168.16-1-8.110 Brief Description: Site plan application for single family residence on Shore Drive near Seneca Point Road and Bristol Harbour in the Town of S. Bristol. This application reports disturbance of 13,776 sq. ft. of the 1.289 acre site. The disturbance is on the western portion of the site where slopes are 25 to 40 or 40 to 50 percent. The area east towards the lake has slopes of over 50 percent. The portion of the site north of the Shore Drive turnaround and adjacent to the lake is an area 30 to 40 feet below the home site with slopes of less than 15 percent. Earlier this summer the gravel access drive and concrete pad for development were installed in compliance with the Town s steep slope ordinance. Currently proposed lot coverage is 11,027 sq.ft. within the 11,229 limit and distributed as follows: House and walks 4,330 sq.ft Stone walls 1,645 sq.ft Gravel driveway 4,905 sq.ft Pool 147 sq.ft. The referral includes documentation of agreements with Bristol Sewerage Disposal Corporation to connect the proposed house to their sewer treatment system and with the Bristol Water-Works Corporation to provide potable water. The design utilizes a1, 000 gallon irrigation cistern and two 1,000 gallon dry wells to minimize the impact of 2,550 gallons of roof runoff per inch of rain on the existing drainage system. According to ONCOR: 1. No state or Federal wetlands are presently on the property. 2. The property is not located in a FEMA floodplain. 3. The property is not located in an Agricultural District. 4. Soil Characteristics Rock outcrop-arnot complex, 35 to 80 percent slopes, extremely stony 72.1% Permeability: Not rated Erodibility: Unknown Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 0 to 3 percent slopes 23.4% 0.300 Permeability: High Erodibility: Medium Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 3 to 8 percent slopes 4.6% 0.060 Permeability: High Erodibility: Medium Canandaigua Lake Watershed Inspector, Kevin Olvany Comments: A sequence of construction along with detailed erosion/sediment control methods is recommended. There is very little shown on the site plan. In addition, more detail regarding exactly how the connections to the water and sewer will occur will also be helpful in determining potential impacts. Will the lines be burrowed, dug etc? Much of the site has already been disturbed and stabilized as part of the creation of the driveway and pad area- the Town granted a steep slope permit for that project. Will there be any other work on the property near the shoreline? Comments: 1. The aerial photo shows the site completely wooded, but the calculation of disturbed land does not seem to include the lawn areas east and west of the proposed residence. ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 14

2. The cistern and dry wells are not shown on the site plan or reflected in the lot coverage. 3. Disturbance and other details of provided water and sewer service are not provided. 4. Given the preponderance of rock outcrop soil conditions, will blasting be required to construct the home or related water or sewer infrastructure? 5. The applicant and referring agency are strongly encouraged to involve the Canandaigua Lake Watershed Manager or the Ontario County Soil and Water Conservation District as early in the review process as possible to ensure proper design and implementation of storm water and erosion control measures. Policy AR-5: Applications involving one single family residential site, including home occupations. The intent of this policy is to: - Address residential development that may infringe on County ROW s or easements for roads and other infrastructure. - Address traffic safety along intermunicipal corridors by encouraging proper placement of residential driveways along County roads. - Address impacts to ground and surface waters Final Classification: Class 1 Findings: 1. As of 2005 69% of the parcels in Ontario County were classified as one or two family residential. Between 2000 and 2005, 2,018 residential parcels were added to the County s tax rolls (Ontario Co. RPTS Annual Report) 2. Collectively individual residential developments have significant impacts on surface and ground water. 3. Proper design of onsite sewage disposal is needed to protect ground and surface waters. 4. Proper storm water and erosion control is also needed to achieve that same end. 5. Proper sight distance at access points along County roads is an important public safety issue of county wide significance. 6. Standards related to protecting water quality and traffic safety have been established by agencies such as the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and NYSEDC. 7. These issues can be addressed by consulting appropriate agencies during local review and ensuring Final Recommendation: The CPB will make no formal recommendation to deny or approve. 228-2017 Town of Farmington Planning Board Class: 1 Referral Type: Subdivision Cynthia Cherichella Property Owner: same Representative: BME Tax Map No(s): 42.05-1-1.999 Brief Description: Subdivision and variance to subdivide an existing 32.2 acre lot with existing residence into 3 parcels. Lot located south of CR 41 west of Fraser Way in the Town of Farmington. The application reports that the 2 lots with frontage on Fraser Way will shared access via a combined 60 access and utility easement in the vicinity of the existing driveway to the house that will be on lot 2 following subdivision. Lot 2 and Lot 3 will each have 30 feet of frontage on Fraser Way and will each require a variance from the 90 foot lot width. There are numerous existing town drainage and utility easements on all 3 lots some of which overlap with the proposed access/utility easement. Both new lots will be connecting to the existing sanitary sewer on site with new proposed sanitary laterals. The new lots will be served by public water via connections to the water lines along Fraser Way for lot 3 and CR 41 for lot 1. The Director of Development has indicated since the details of these connections are not shown on the subdivision plan, the approval will be for non-building lots and a site plan will be required prior to issuance of any building permit. According to ONCOR: 1. No state or Federal wetlands are presently on the property. 2. The property is not located in a FEMA floodplain. ONTARIO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 ONTARIO ST. CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 585-396-4455 WWW.CO.ONTARIO.NY.US 15