The Maryland Puritan Tiger Beetle Habitat Conservation Program

Similar documents
The Maryland Rural Legacy and CREP Easement Programs

IRS FORM 8283 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT DONATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT

TransNet Environmental Mitigation Program: Land Acquisition and Restoration Process and Criteria

IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT. for the EAST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN/ NATURAL COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN.

Chapter SWAINSON S HAWK IMPACT MITIGATION FEES

NOTICE DATE: August 19, Joint Public Notice. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Arkansas

LAKE OF THE WOODS COUNTY WETLAND CONSERVATION ORDINANCE OF 2002

Proposed Everglades Headwaters National Wildlife Refuge and Conservation Area

Environmental Credit Offsets: Not Just for Wetlands Transportation Engineers Association of Missouri

Bandera Corridor Conservation Bank: a conservation story

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

ZEKIAH WATERSHED RURAL LEGACY AREA

Chapter HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN / NATURAL COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE

Introduction. Management Strategies for Central Maritime Chaparral. Reasons for Protection

Introduction to INRMP Implementation Options

APPLICATION. Telephone Fax Address. Telephone Fax Address FOR MARTIN COUNTY USE ONLY

Federal Mandates and Willing Sellers: Real Estate Acquisition for the Missouri River Recovery Program

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT Town of Hatfield OPEN SPACE PROJECT GUIDELINES

Natomas Joint Vision Open Space Program

East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan / Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP) HCP/NCCP Application Process.

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC HEARING (rev. March, 2016)

Public Notice. Notice No Closing Date: August 16, 2018

Using Easements to Conserve Biodiversity. Jeff Lerner Defenders of Wildlife

Neighborhood Stabilization Fact Sheet CONNECTICUT'S 1ST DISTRICT

AVAILABLE FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

SUBCHAPTER 59F CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) STATE PORTION OF THE PROGRAM

Creek Rehabilitation Plan for Apple Valley Questions and Answers from the Pre-Bid Meeting and Site Visit 06/23/2016

Mitigation and Conservation Banking

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Town of Jupiter ( Town ) has adopted a Comprehensive Plan

PROTECTING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED. C. Ronald Franks Audrey Scott

Transfer of Development Rights

Application Procedures for Easements or Rights of Way on City of Fort Collins Natural Areas and Conserved Lands March 2012

FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT. GRANT PROGRAM: Endangered Species Act Section 6 Recovery Land Acquisition

Yolo Habitat Conservancy County of Yolo City of Davis City of Winters City of West Sacramento City of Woodland University of California, Davis

WELCOME Garland Power & Light

Passaic County Open Space, Farmland, & Historic Preservation Trust Fund

West Virginia Outdoor Heritage Conservation Fund. Grant Program TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE MANUAL

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L ENRTF Work Plan (Main Document)

TOWN OF PELHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE

Article 5. Environmentally Sensitive Areas

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 1272 A BILL ENTITLED

CONSERVING TREASURED LANDSCAPES IN THE CHESAPEAKE Appendix FRIENDS OF THE JOHN SMITH CHESAPEAKE TRAIL REPORT

Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation Buffer Lands Program Program Description and Application

2015 Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve Wetlands Program

Sample Baseline Documentation Report (BDR) Annotated Template for Environmentally Important Land

CITY OF WINTERS HABITAT MITIGATION PROGRAM

Deb Grube Walworth County Land Use and Resource Management

SECTION IV. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends the following motion (with modifications and additions following discussion):

South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Study

Notice of Continuance Land Classified as Current Use or Forest Land Chapter and Revised Code of Washington

Notice of Continuance Land Classified as Current Use or Forest Land RCW Chapter and 84.33

Conservation Easement Stewardship

The University of Texas System Systemwide Policy. Policy: UTS Title. Environmental Review for Acquisition of Real Property. 2.

Municipal Planning Services Ltd Chris D. Jones BES, MCIP, RPP 51 Churchill Drive, Unit 1 Barrie, Ontario L4N 8Z5

Corporation Of The City Of Kingston. Ontario. By-Law Number A By-Law To Provide For The Conveyance Of Land For Park Purposes,

2009 Project Abstract For the Period Ending June 30, 2011

WALWORTH COUNTY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT/CONSERVATION (262) Land Disturbance/Erosion Control Fay Amerson, Urban Program Specialist

Establishment of Swan Valley Conservation Area, Montana. SUMMARY: This notice advises the public that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Door County Shoreland Zoning. Door County Land Use Services Department June 26, 2018

Landowner s Guide to Conservation Incentives In Georgia

An Accounting Tradeoff Between WRP and Government Payments. Authors Gregory Ibendahl Mississippi State University

ARTICLE 5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Forest Service Role CHAPTER 2

Preserving Forested Lands

Request to Advertise: Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) Map Update. June 20, 2017

MITIGATION POLICY FOR DISTRICT-PROTECTED LANDS

Central Pennsylvania Conservancy Project Selection Criteria Form

Applicant s Agent Lisa Murphy, Esq. Staff Planner PJ Scully. Lot Recordation 12/01/1972 Map Book 94, Page 33 GPIN

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 17, 2017

Land Use. Existing Land Use

Public Notice U.S. Army Corps In Reply to Application Number CENAB-OP-RMS (WANAMAKER, GEOFFERY & SUSAN) Baltimore District

MARK TWAIN LAKE MASTER PLAN CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE MONROE CITY, MISSOURI

Easement Program Guidelines for Water Resources and Stream Work

Open Space Model Ordinance

Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) Map Update. Presentation to the County Board July 15, 2017

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE

NEW YORK CITY WETLANDS TRANSFER TASK FORCE PROPERTY ASSESSMENT FORM

Neighborhood Stabilization Fact Sheet IOWA'S 1ST DISTRICT

CHAPTER 12. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

Georgia Conservation Tax Credit Program Frequently Asked Questions

Submittal of the Minutes from the March 9, 2011, April 5, 2011, and April 19, 2011 Cabinet Meetings.

TURTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION, PHASE THREE

APRIL 30, ILL. ADM. CODE 2580 CH. I, SEC. 2580

Changes to the SFIA Program:

Bowie Marketplace Residential Detailed Site Plan Statement of Justification January 13, 2017 Revised February 2, 1017

THE BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS REVISED MAY 2006

ARTICLE XI - CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS

CHAPTER 8. IMPLEMENTATION COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCES

Lessard Sams Outdoor Heritage Council

A COST-BENEFIT APPROACH TO COASTAL ADAPTATION

Conservation of Coastal Alabama A Land Conservation Presentation

DEER RIVER COMMERCIAL PARK SUBDIVISION

Kent/MSU Extension Attn: Stacy Byers 775 Ball Ave NE Grand Rapids, MI Tel: (616)

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE CORPS OF ENGINEERS STATE OF ARKANSAS Application Number: Date: December 9, 2016 Comments Due: January 3, 2017

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON. D.C MAR

[First Reprint] SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED SEPTEMBER 17, 2018

Implementation of Permanent Easements and Associated Nutrient Load Reductions

Amendment 1 Sponsor Committee Water and Land Conservation Amendment (850)

ORDINANCE NO. 875 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 875

Transcription:

The Maryland Puritan Tiger Beetle Habitat Conservation Program Maryland Department of Natural Resources Annapolis, MD 21401 October 2011

The Maryland Puritan Tiger Beetle Habitat Conservation Program October 2011 A person who proposes to conduct an activity that will result in the incidental taking of the State endangered and federally threatened Puritan tiger beetle (PTB) may mitigate the impact of this activity by contributing funds to the Department s PTB habitat conservation program. Other options to mitigate for the incidental taking may be considered and approved, as noted in the Background section, below. The following guidelines apply if the landowner wishes to use the mitigation option of participating in the Department of Natural Resources Puritan tiger beetle habitat conservation program. Background Maryland law provides, A person shall obtain a permit from the Department before the person may conduct any activity that will result in the incidental taking of Puritan tiger beetles. As a condition for receiving a permit, the applicant is required to mitigate impact to the PTB habitat, as follows: (1) Mitigation shall be employed whenever the habitat alteration will render a significant portion of the site unsuitable for Puritan tiger beetles in either their adult or larval life forms. (2) Mitigation shall occur at not less than a 1:1 ratio. Mitigation measures may include: (a) permanent protection of other property having PTB habitat or (b) restoration or protection of PTB habitat by participating financially in the Departmentʹs Puritan tiger beetle habitat conservation program. The purpose of the Department s PTB habitat conservation program (HCP) is to mitigate the impact of a take by acquiring or restoring habitat for permanent protection of the PTB. To fund the acquisition of PTB habitat, the Department has established the PTB HCP Fund (the Fund ). A landowner, a group of landowners, or a community (collectively, landowner ), may participate in the Department s HCP by making payment to the Fund. The amount of payment depends on the mitigation debt of the proposed shoreline or cliff alteration project as determined by the federal Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) project review process and protection of equivalent habitat. A landowner initiates this 2

process by contacting FWS. For contact information, go to: http://www.fws.gov/chesapeakebay/ptb. The review process and description of the calculation of equivalent habitat follows. Little Cove Point is used as an example for illustrative purposes. The FWS Project Review Process There are ten subpopulations of PTB habitat located along the 23 mile shoreline in Calvert County and eight subpopulations comprising the Sassafras River population. Each subpopulation has a carrying capacity, or K which is the ability of the habitat to produce and sustain PTB. An incidental take of PTB habitat impacts the carrying capacity, or K, of the applicable subpopulation. For the purposes of this Program, K is defined as the average total number of PTB occurring at a site or transect over the 5 year period of 2005 through 2009 as observed during annual surveys. A land parcel that contains part of the subpopulation has a percentage of the total carrying capacity, expressed as a percentage of the overall carrying capacity of the subpopulation. The Program uses five years of data, 2005 2009, as a reasonable sample (the life cycle of the beetle is two years) that provides predictability for project applicants. DNR and FWS will update the PVA every 4 5 years and recalculate the carrying capacities at that time. There are 62 parcels at Little Cove Point with PTB habitat. The carrying capacity of these parcels ranges from.05% to 6.8% of the total carrying capacity of the subpopulation. During the project review process, FWS will calculate the project s impact on PTB and discuss ways to reduce this impact. FWS will also calculate the amount of payment to the Fund in accordance with the formula described below should the landowner elect to use this mitigation option. Protection of Equivalent Habitat The amount of payment to the Fund is calculated using the following three factors: (a) the area required to conserve the subpopulation, (b) the cost of protecting this area through a conservation easement, and (c) the cost of protecting habitat equivalent to the habitat impacted. The fair market value of an easement is determined using an appropriate estimate, as described below. 3

A. The Area Required to Conserve the Subpopulation A PTB subpopulation is permanently protected if a conservation easement prevents any landowner with property in the subpopulation from disturbing the beach or cliff face and precludes the construction of shore erosion control structures. Under accepted standards, the period of protection for an HCP is 100 years. Because the Calvert Cliffs erode at an average rate of 2 feet/year, to protect PTB habitat for 100 years requires a minimum 200 foot buffer as measured from the top of the cliff landward. Thus, the area of the buffer is the length of shoreline of the subpopulation x 200 feet. The length of shoreline consists of sites having PTB habitat during the applicable five year period. Little Cove Point in Calvert County has a subpopulation of PTB. The length of shoreline of the sites supporting the subpopulation is 10,167 feet. Multiplied by 200 feet, the area of easement protection would be 46.68 acres for this subpopulation. B. The Cost of Protecting the Area A conservation easement for tiger beetle habitat is a restriction on property that prevents development within the 200 feet buffer and shore erosion control. The cost of acquiring a conservation easement is calculated using the federal Wetland Reserve Program s Geographic Rate Caps for Cropland (WRP GRC). This is the methodology employed by the USFWS for estimating the cost of purchasing a conservation easement to protect federally threatened or endangered species. Cropland values are used because they are closer to residential lot values than woodland. Using WRP GRC values, the per acre cost to acquire a conservation easement on the subpopulation in Little Cove Point is $6,025. Multiplying 46.68 acres by $6,025 = $281,247, which is the cost of acquiring a conservation easement on the entire subpopulation. C. The Cost of Permanently Protecting Equivalent Habitat The cost of protecting equivalent habitat is calculated by multiplying the percentage of PTB carrying capacity impacted by the incidental take by the cost of protecting the entire subpopulation. In this way, a landowner who impacts more PTB habitat will contribute more to the HCP than a landowner who impacts less PTB habitat. 4

A Little Cove Point landowner wishes to construct a cliff stabilization project that will result in the incidental take of 3% PTB carrying capacity. Multiplying 3% x $281,247 = $8,437. This is the amount of landowner payment to the Fund. The Puritan Tiger Beetle HCP Formula The formula for calculating payments for PTB habitat impacts for any of the Calvert Cliffs subpopulations is a follows: Determine the percentage of PTB carrying capacity (K) impacted by the incidental take, referred to as the mitigation debt; Calculate the area of conservation for the subpopulation by determining the length of the shoreline of parcels having PTB habitat and multiply this length by 200 feet, referred to as the PTB conservation area; Determine the cost of acquiring a conservation easement to protect the PTB conservation area; Multiply the percentage of K by the cost of protecting the PTB conservation area. This is the amount of payment to the PTB HCP. Uses of the PTB HCP Fund The Department of Natural Resources will use this fund exclusively for the acquisition or restoration of PTB habitat from willing sellers or other recovery measures deemed necessary to ensure the continued existence of the species. Acquisition may include the purchase of conservation easements or fee simple acquisition of PTB habitat. Restoration of habitat may include vegetation control along occupied cliff faces or of degraded habitat within a subpopulation. Restoration of habitat may also include beach replenishment along beaches within a subpopulation that do not have adequate foraging habitat. Additional DNR funds may be used in conjunction with the PTB HCP Fund to assist with the conservation of the Puritan tiger beetle. 5

DNR Contact: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Wildlife and Heritage Service 580 Taylor Avenue E 1 Annapolis, MD 21401 410 260 85 7 tim.larney@maryland.gov 6