DRAFT. Transit Oriented Development Design Guidelines. Introduction. Path Forward

Similar documents
PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

From Policy to Reality

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

Town of Clinton, Connecticut Action Plan for the Historic Unilever Property and Area. Steering Committee Meeting #5 Implementation Strategies

MERIDEN TOD A NEW TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ZONING REGULATION FOR MERIDEN. Greater Meriden Chamber & Connecticut Bar Association

PLANNING FOR PARKING AROUND MARTA STATIONS. Lindbergh Transit Oriented Development. Lessons Learned & Best Practices

th Avenue SW. For Sale. Building Information. Features: Potential:

Parking Assessment Proposed Mixed-Use Residential Development. 177 Cross Avenue Town of Oakville. Prepared For: Ontario Inc.

Land Use Impacts of BRT

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

Land Stewardship at TODs Does It Work?

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016

Chapter URBAN VILLAGE ZONING DISTRICTS

1 dwelling unit/existing parcel with provisions for a guest house and additional quarters

LONG-RANGE LAND USE PLAN

4.13 Population and Housing

ORDINANCE City of DeBary Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 3

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTATION LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION PROJECT AREA

The Florida Affordable Housing Suitability Model. Florida Housing Coalition State Conference Sept. 27, 2011

Metro Boston Perfect Fit Parking Initiative

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

M:\2016\116063\DATA\APPLICATIONS\SITE PLAN\PLANNING ADDENDUM\PLANNING BRIEF WATERFORD.DOCX.PAGE 1

ATTACHMENT C. Development Requirements

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 904

TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS

How to get your city off its parking addiction Downtown Glendale s story

Washington Boulevard + Kirkwood Road Special General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Study "Plus"

Transit-Oriented Development Specialized Real Estate Services

To Download the Guidelines Document:

Planning Justification Report

Presentation Review. SunRail History Agreement Summaries Contract Summaries Project Update

Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

City of Port Moody. City Lands OCP and Rezoning Amendments Information Session Feedback Summary. Regular Council Meeting - January 23, 2018

UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPER S DECISION- MAKING IN THE REGION OF WATERLOO

Semoran Blvd. Transit Study. May 1, 2018 Gateway Orlando Connection Core Group Meeting Ana G Méndez University, Orlando, FL

1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE CIP VISION LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Municipal Act Planning Act...

Ashcroft Homes Trim Road Development Planning Rationale

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL S FORECASTS METHODOLOGY JUNE 14, 2017

PUBLIC NOTICE* Studies Requested: Parking analysis. Other Required Permits: Building Permit, Site Development Permit

GEORGE / GROSVENOR AREA STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS PLANNING CITY OF LONDON DEPARTMENT OF. MAY 1985 r----q

Welcome. Please show us where you live: A Zone and Design Guidelines for the Apartment Transition Area. We want your feedback!

Hennepin County Department of. Housing, Community Works and Transit. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Guidelines

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE. Joint Study Session March 29, 2017

6. Review of Property Value Impacts at Rapid Transit Stations and Lines

Actual & Projected Population

ORDINANCE NO. 15- Regulations (LDR) which would further the codification of TOD regulations that

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

174 North King Street Workforce Housing Development Downtown Jackson, Wyoming

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

Mayor Darrell R. Mussatto and Members of Council ENHANCED NOTICE AND ASSISTANCE OPTIONS FOR TENANT DISPLACEMENT

Future Land Use Categories & Nodes December 23, Future Land Use Categories

Corporate Services Planning and Economic Development. Memorandum

CHAPTER 2 VACANT AND REDEVELOPABLE LAND INVENTORY

Economic Empowerment District (draft) Enhanced Factsheet

North Hanley Station. o Flower Valley Shopping Center o Cross Keys Shopping Cente #49 North Lindbergh MetroBus

TOD and Equity. TOD Working Group. James Carras Carras Community Investment, Inc. August 7, 2015

Truax Park Apartments

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL S FORECASTS METHODOLOGY

Comprehensive Plan Amendment #PLN , Reserve at Cannon Branch (Coles Magisterial District)

Downtown Area Plan Development Feasibility Study

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement

Rule of corner may need to be flexible i.e. context school, park. With a clustered approach. Should row housing go where fourplexes are?

SB 827 (WIENER) TRANSIT-RICH HOUSING BONUS, RESOLUTION TO OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED COUNCILMEMBER JOHN D'AMICO COUNCILMEMBER LAUREN MEISTER

Downtown Plano. Creating a Transit Village

Parallel Lines : Railway Infrastructure Development and its interaction with Urban Growth in Hong Kong

Land Use and Zoning Changes for Land Development Code Update

Housing & Residential Intensification Study Discussion Paper Township of King

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

Amendments to the Dallas Development Code Creating Regulations for Mixed Income Housing Development Bonuses

Presentation. Agenda Item # 1. Meeting Date February 3, Erkin Ozberk, Planner. Prepared By. Brian T. Kenner City Manager.

WELCOME! TO THE UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT LANDS BLOCK F PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

5. SALE OF SURPLUS LAND, CENTREPOINTE, NEPEAN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. That Council:

Annual (2013) Review of the Surrey Official Community Plan

The Planning Commission. DATE: July 19, 2016

LAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN

forwarddallas! Development Code Amendments Approach Quality of Life Committee Briefing June 11, 2007

METRO BOARD OF DIRECTORS REAL ESTATE WORKING COMMITTEE MEETING AUGUST 20, :30 PM

Highland Green Estates Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

2019 DC Study External Stakeholder Committee Minutes

When the Plan is not Enough

Settlement Pattern & Form with service costs analysis Preliminary Report

DRAFT REPORT. Boudreau Developments Ltd. Hole s Site - The Botanica: Fiscal Impact Analysis. December 18, 2012

Proposed Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

LAND USE AMENDMENT SOUTHWOOD (WARD 11) MACLEOD TRAIL S AND ANDERSON ROAD SW BYLAWS 140D2018 AND 141D2018

Proffers vs. Impact Fees:

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING COMMISSION

NC 54/I-40 Corridor Master Plan Draft Land Use Blueprint

RE: Transportation Overview Youth Services Bureau Housing First Hub for Youth 2887 Riverside Drive

Residential Intensification in Established Neighbourhoods Study (RIENS)

DRAFT Housing Technical Bulletin

Community & Infrastructure Services Committee

CONNECTING ARLINGTON S POLICY FRAMEWORK TO THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING WORKING GROUP

Broadway Corridor Framework Plan Pearl District Business Association November 10, 2015

Make No Small Plans: Innovative Western Planned Communities. 10:00 11:10 a.m. Friday, April 22, 2005 Sturm College of Law

An Executive Summary. Residential Market Potential

Transcription:

Transit Oriented Development Design Guidelines Introduction Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Design Guidelines are being developed by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to provide general parameters and strategies to local governments and agencies to promote and implement development that is supportive of transit investment. The guidelines provide the following variables that should be considered when planning for and implementing development around transit station areas: Population and employment density, Intensity and diversity of land uses, availability, and the Physical design of the street network to provide connectivity and accessibility. Minimum standards and ranges for these variables are provided to guide local governments in refining their Comprehensive Plans and Land Development Codes to support various transit technologies within different place types ranging from urban to rural. Density and intensity ranges, as well as for other characteristics of transit supportive development, are provided for the use of local governments in establishing development standards for areas located within an approximate ½ mile radius of a planned or existing transit station. The guidelines are voluntary, and the TOD principles are intended to be used in partnership with the FDOT to assist in managing congestion on state roadways, especially on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS). Implementation of the principles contained with these guidelines can assist local governments to comply with Florida s Growth Management Act of 2005 regarding the mitigation of impacts to the SIS. Path Forward This document provides an initial framework for planning for and implementing TOD in Florida. The guidelines will be vetted with local governments, agencies, and the public through work sessions conducted throughout the state. Based on the input gained at these work sessions, the draft TOD framework will be refined, and the context, purpose, and use of the guidelines will be more thoroughly defined within a Guidance Document for distribution and use by local governments and agencies.

Transit Modes by Urban Transect Urban Transects Transit Modes Special Automated Fixed Guideway Water-Bourne Ferry Streetcar/Trolley Light Rail Transit Bus Rapid Transit Heavy Rail Transit High Speed Rail Commuter Rail Local Bus Fixed Route Bus Demand Response Bus/Shuttle Express Bus Express Route Bus T6, T5 T4 T3 T2 Urban Core Urban General Suburban Rural 5 1 3 6 2 4 7 8 9 Legend 1 thru 9 Feasible under certain conditions Feasible Design Guidelines Matrix Column No.

T5/T6 Urban Core Special, Light Rail, Bus Rapid, Commuter Rail T6/T5 Urban Core > 35 Dwelling Units/Acre > 135 Persons/Acre > 1000 Jobs/Acre Minimum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) > 10.0 > 55 Dwelling Units/Acre 12 or more Stories Minimum Lot Coverage 80% Minimum Street Frontage Maximum Residential (Spaces per Unit) Maximum Office/Retail (Spaces per 1,000 100% primary, 80% secondary 1 space/unit 1 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. Maximum Surface (% of Total Spaces) 10% Shared vs. Single-Use Facility Shared No 18 Hours 10 Jobs : 1 Dwelling Unit 20% Residential and 80% Non-Residential Min. 150 Average Block Size (in Feet) 200' x 400' Raised Median LRT Raised Median

T4 Urban General Special, Light Rail, Bus Rapid, Commuter Rail T4 Urban General 15 to 35 Dwelling Units/Acre 100 to 145 Persons/Acre 190 to 250 Jobs/Acre Minimum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 3.0-4.0 45 to 60 Dwelling Units/Acre 4 or more Stories Minimum Lot Coverage 70% Minimum Street Frontage 70% Maximum Residential (Spaces per Unit) Maximum Office/Retail (Spaces per 1,000 1.5 Spaces/Unit 2 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. Maximum Surface (% of Total Spaces) 15% Shared vs. Single-Use Facility Shared No 16 Hours 5 Jobs : 1 Dwelling Unit 50% Residential and 50% Non-Residential Min. 75 Average Block Size (in Feet) 200' x 600' Traffic Raised Median Traffic Mixed use Station Platform Rail Tracks Platform Park and Ride Station

T3 Suburban Light Rail, Bus Rapid, Commuter Rail T3 Suburban 5 to 30 Dwelling Units/Acre 80 to 135 Persons/Acre 35 to 80 Jobs/Acre Minimum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 2.0-3.0 35 to 60 Dwelling Units/Acre 3 or more Stories Minimum Lot Coverage 80% Minimum Street Frontage 80% Maximum Residential (Spaces per Unit) Maximum Office/Retail (Spaces per 1,000 2 Spaces/Unit 3 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. Maximum Surface (% of Total Spaces) 20% Shared vs. Single-Use Facility Shared Yes 14 Hours 1 Jobs : 1 Dwelling Unit 70% Residential and 30% Non-Residential Min. 50 Average Block Size (in Feet) 200' x 800' Raised Median LRT Raised Median

T2 Rural Express Bus T2 Rural 5 to 10 Dwelling Units/Acre 25 to 50 Persons/Acre 5 to 10 Jobs/Acre Minimum Floor Area Ratio (FAR).5-1.0 10 to 20 Dwelling Units/Acre 2 Stories Minimum Lot Coverage 50% Minimum Street Frontage 70% Maximum Residential (Spaces per Unit) Maximum Office/Retail (Spaces per 1,000 2 Spaces/Unit 4 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. Maximum Surface (% of Total Spaces) 40% Shared vs. Single-Use Facility Yes 1 Job : 2 Dwelling Units 90% Residential & 10% Non-Residential Average Block Size (in Feet) / Bus Stop

Design Guidelines Matrix 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 T6/T5 Urban Core T6/T5 Urban Core T4 Urban General T4 Urban General T3 Suburban T3 Suburban T3 Suburban T3 Suburban T2/T1 Rural Remarks Commuter Rail/LRT/BRT Local Bus Hub Commuter Rail/LRT/BRT Local Bus Hub LRT/BRT Commuter Rail Local Bus Hub Express Bus Express Bus See Note B Gross Density > 35 Dwelling Units/Acre 15 to 20 Dwelling Units/Acre 25 to 35 Dwelling Units/Acre 15 to 25 Dwelling Units/Acre 20 to 25 Dwelling Units/Acre 20 to 30 Dwelling Units/Acre 10 to 20 Dwelling Units/Acre 5 to 10 Dwelling Units/Acre 5 to 10 Dwelling Units/Acre See Notes A, C, F > 85 Persons/Acre 40 to 50 Persons/Acre 65 to 85 Persons/Acre 45 to 65 Persons/Acre 45 to 70 Persons/Acre 50 to 80 Persons/Acre 25 to 50 Persons/Acre 15 to 30 Persons/Acre 10 to 25 Persons/Acre See Notes A, C, F > 500 Jobs/Acre 150 to 200 Jobs/Acre 100 to 150 Jobs/Acre 75 to 100 Jobs/Acre 30 to 40 Jobs/Acre 20 to 30 Jobs/Acre 10 to 25 Jobs/Acre 2 to 5 Jobs/Acre 2 to 5 Jobs/Acre See Notes A, C, F Minimum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) > 10.0 3.0-4.0 3.0-4.0 2.0-3.0 2.0-3.0 2.0-3.0 1.0-2.0.5-1.0.5-1.0 See Notes A, C Minimum Residential Density (Net) > 55 Dwelling Units/Acre 25 to 35 Dwelling Units/Acre 45 to 60 Dwelling Units/Acre 30 to 45 Dwelling Units/Acre 35 to 50 Dwelling Units/Acre 40 to 60 Dwelling Units/Acre 20 to 40 Dwelling Units/Acre 10 to 25 Dwelling Units/Acre 10 to 20 Dwelling Units/Acre See Note E, F 12 or more Stories 4 or more Stories 4 or more Stories 3 or more Stories 3 or more Stories 3 or more Stories 2 or more Stories 2 or more Stories 1 or more Stories Minimum Lot Coverage 80% 70% 70% 70% 80% 70% 70% 70% 50% Minimum Street Frontage 100% primary, 80% secondary 80% 70% 70% 80% 70% 70% 70% 70% See Notes C, E Maximum Residential (Spaces per Unit) 1 space/unit 1.5 Spaces/Unit 1.5 Spaces/Unit 1.5 Spaces/Unit 2 Spaces/Unit 2 Spaces/Unit 2 Spaces/Unit 2 Spaces/Unit 2 Spaces/Unit Maximum Office/Retail (Spaces per 1,000 1 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. 2 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. 2 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. 2 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. 3 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. 3 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. 3 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. 3 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. 4 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. Maximum Surface (% of Total Spaces) 10% 15% 15% 15% 20% 25% 30% 30% 40% Shared vs. Single-Use Facility Shared Shared Shared Shared Shared Shared Shared Shared No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 18 Hours 16 Hours 16 Hours 14 Hours 14 Hours 14 Hours 12 Hours 15 Jobs : 1 Dwelling Unit 10 Jobs : 1 Dwelling Unit 5 Jobs : 1 Dwelling Unit 4 Jobs : 1 Dwelling Unit 1.5 Jobs : 1 Dwelling Unit 1 Jobs : 1 Dwelling Unit 1 Jobs : 1 Dwelling Unit 1 Job : 2 Dwelling Units 1 Job : 2 Dwelling Units 20% Residential and 80% Non-Residential 30% Residential and 70% Non-Residential 50% Residential and 50% Non-Residential 50% Residential and 50% Non-Residential 70% Residential and 30% Non-Residential 80% Residential and 20% Non-Residential 80% Residential and 20% Non-Residential 90% Residential and 10% Non-Residential 90% Residential and 10% Non-Residential See Notes C, D Min. 150 Min. 150 Min. 75 Min. 75 Min. 50 Min. 50 Min. 50 Min. 50 Average Block Size (in Feet) 200' x 400' 200' x 400' 200' x 600' 200' x 600' 200' x 800' 200' x 800' 200' x 800' 200' x 800' Assumptions and Notes: A. The guidelines provides policy guidance (gross densities, development/design standards) for transit oriented development sites located within an approximately1/2 mile radius around a transit station or 1/4 mile around a local bus hub. The target density and intensity of specific developments could vary based on the size and location of the developments within the station area. This variation in density/intensity as well as design standards for streets and other public spaces should be addressed through a station area plan/overlay. B. The development potential around Commuter Rail, Light Rail and Bus Rapid Transit stations are similar since the station spacing and service levels are within a comparable range. Commuter Rail and Commuter Bus have distinctly different transit service characteristics and development impact in station areas. Local or Fixed Route Bus is assumed to be supportive of transit oriented development at a transfer station or local bus hub consisting of a minimum of 3 routes and 30 minute headways, i.e. level of service D per the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. In suburban areas, the development around Commuter Rail is assumed to be rich in residential uses. C. Intensity (FAR), net residential density, mix of uses (% residential / % non-residential) and lot coverage are variables used to calculate the gross density indicators (residential, employment, and population). The gross density indicators are adjusted for land development capacity (vacant, redevelopment, and not available for development or redevelopment) and public infrastructure/open space requirements. Gross population density assumes 2.49 persons per dwelling based on Florida Census data. D. The residential/non-residential mix is managed by transects to reflect preferences about living and working, but the general assumption is that residential uses are higher in suburban and rural areas compared to the urban core and urban general transects, which are more employment centric. The mix of uses could vary by approximately 15% based on the location of the development relative to the transit station and/or hub. E. In the urban core and urban general transects, each dwelling unit is assumed to be 1,500 sq.ft. and each job is assigned 350 sq.ft. (average of retail and office employment). In suburban transects, each dwelling unit is assumed to be 1,800 sq.ft. and each job is assigned 500 sq.ft. (average of retail and office employment). In rural transects, each dwelling unit is assumed to be 2,000 sq.ft. and each job is assigned 500 sq.ft. (average of retail and office employment). F. The variables listed under are minimum net development/design standards that project the anticipated development potential of a transit oriented development site based on it's context. The net development standards will require calibration to existing intensity/density, land availability (vacant or redevelopment), public infrastructure/open spaces, location within station areas, etc. The target gross density indicators guide the degree and direction of calibration.