Eletta Purdy, District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards. Municipal Licensing and Standards Folder # FEN

Similar documents
Eletta Purdy, District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards. Municipal Licensing and Standards Folder No FEN

Application for Fence Exemption- 361 The West Mall

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED. 7-11, 19-25, and 45 Zorra Street Zoning Application Final Report SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS. Date: January 30, 2007

SECTION REQUIREMENT PROPOSAL. An E-Employment sign district may contain a wall sign provided the sign shall only be erected at the first storey.

FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION

Deeming By-law, Maple Leaf Drive, Bourdon Avenue, Venice Drive, Stella Street and Seabrook Avenue Final Report

Islington Avenue Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications Final Report

FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF INGERSOLL BY-LAW NO

ARTICLE 14 BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, AND USES ACCESSORY TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS

FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION

1450 St. Clair Avenue West Approval Under the Funeral, Burial, and Cremation Services Act (Formerly the Cemeteries Act) General Report

SECTION 6: DOWNTOWN ZONES

Closing a portion of Judge Road south of Six Point Road

205, 215, 225 and 235 Sherway Gardens Road City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment Application Final Report

Greg Mikolash, Development Review Supervisor ( ;

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE VILLAGE OF SUNBURY ZONING CODE ESTABLISHING FENCE REGULATIONS

This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of low rise multiple family housing.

Services Department B September 10, 2007 Fencing and Small Accessory Buildings in Front Yards on Corner Lots in Residential Zones

Combined Zoning/Minor Variance and Boulevard Parking Agreement Exception

City of Thorold Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2140(97)

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

Mark Sraga, Director and Deputy Chief Building Official

Fence and Wall Bulletin

FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

PART 11 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES

Director of Toronto Building and Deputy Chief Building Official

Staff Report. Street Vacation. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. Ashley Scarff, (801) or Date: April 10 th, 2019

This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of medium density, high rise multiple family housing.

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

Amend. BL 3480, 1982 Amend. BL 4691, 1990 RMH ZONE: MOBILE HOME PARK RESIDENTIAL. 640A.1 Permitted Uses: Dwelling, Mobile Home

PART XXIII - RT-1 TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL ZONE A. INTENT

FENCE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION

25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Appeals of Committee of Adjustment Decisions

377 Poetry Drive, Woodbridge HUMPHRIES PLANNING GROUP INC. Condition of Approval Building Standards B020/14 A074/14 B020/14 B020/14

Inspection Reports. Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Introduction. and the. A Joint Project.

51-65 Quebec Avenue and High Park Avenue Residential Rental Demolition Application Final Report

SECTION 53 Page 1 of 5. SECTION 53 (By-law , S.3) LOW INTENSITY MIXED USE CORRIDOR ZONE (MU-1)

SECTION 10.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES

City of Thorold Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2140(97)

DISTRICT OF NORTH SAANICH BYLAW NO. 1306

Village of Lombard Community Development Department/Building Division 255 E. Wilson Avenue Lombard, IL Tel: Fax:

COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

140 Charmaine Road, Woodbridge. Condition of Approval Building Standards Development Planning Engineering TRCA PowerStream Other - Other -

Rural Roads Fence Encroachment Strategy

CHAPTER 2 RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER LAWS.

RURAL SETTLEMENT ZONE - RULES

SECTION 10: COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES

SWIMMING POOL PERMIT APPLICATION PACKET

THE CORPORATION OF DELTA BYLAW NO A Bylaw to amend the Delta Zoning Bylaw No. 2750, 1977

Planning Commission Report

Prepared for the Board of Directors of the Green Trails Improvement Association. July, 1981

A. Application Procedure

J IJ S RECEIVED RECOMMENDATION APPLICATION

Files: A191/13, A192/13, & A193/13. Applicants: NASHVILLE DEVELOPMENT (SOUTH) INC. AND NASHVILLE MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS INC.

KANKAKEE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR FARMSTEAD EXEMPTION IN THE A1 DISTRICT

Staff Report Summary Item #10

Applicant: ROYAL 7 DEVELOPMENTS LTD 2900 HIGHWAY 7 WEST, CONCORD. LUKA KOT Royal 7 Developments Inc.

250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Staff Report Summary Item # 12

Parkland Encroachment Policy and Procedures (All Wards)

Fence Permit Application Information NOTE: Job is not to be started until permit is picked up and paid for.

ARTICLE 6.07 FENCES Division 1. Generally

2 Monteverde Way, Woodbridge. Condition of Approval Building Standards Development Planning Engineering TRCA PowerStream Other - Other -

Applicant: GIOVANNI PAOLO CALLIPO and NIKI CALLIPO. 40 Christina Ciccolini Court, Woodbridge

Pool Enclosure Permit Application

Applicant: SHARON & PHILIP LOCILENTO. 163 Arnold Avenue, Thornhill. David Small Designs

1061 The Queensway - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

NOTICE: RULES AND REGULATIONS Country Crossing Neighborhood Stansbury Park, Utah. September 2009

- 1 - RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AS TO USE OF LAND

July 7, 2014 City Hall - Room 514

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

PART 6 GENERAL REGULATIONS

Section Development standards for single family districts.

Hamlet of Tuktoyaktuk

RESOLUTION NO

PUBLIC HEARINGS. Variance 887 Grosvenor Avenue (River Heights - Fort Garry Ward) File DAV /2018C [c/r DCU /2018C]

111 Plunkett Road (formerly part of 135 Plunkett Road) - Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Plan of Subdivision Application - Preliminary Report

ARTICLE 5. R-6 Residential- Duplex, Single Family Detached and Townhouse District

Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the amendment to Article 4, Article 7, and Article 14 as presented by Staff on 6/19/17.

Charter Township ofshelby

MSC Ridgewood Subdivision

RESIDENTIAL SHEDS LESS THAN 200 SF INFORMATION PACKET

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 65 Article 12: C-1 Neighborhood Shopping District

DAMMERON VALLEY LANDOWNERS ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES [May, 2010] PREFACE

A. Zoning Inspector report for May (see )

Please read the entire application form prior to completing

BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION

City of Coquitlam Board of Variance Application

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Toronto Building, Toronto and East York District

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No , as amended...

Section 6 Residential (R3) Zone

CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW To adopt a new City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 519, Infill Construction, Public Notice.

Telecommunications Development Permit Application Package

836 St Clair Ave W - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Transcription:

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Application for Fence Exemption 364 Evans Avenue Date: May 28, 2014 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Etobicoke York Community Council Eletta Purdy, District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards Ward 6 Etobicoke - Lakeshore Municipal Licensing and Standards Folder # 14 126381 FEN SUMMARY This is a matter for which the Etobicoke York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. This staff report is in response to an application submitted by the property owner of 364 Evans Avenue for a fence exemption to erect new fencing and maintain existing fencing composed of corrugated metal, chain link and barbed wire. The existing and proposed fence is in violation of height and construction restrictions set out in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences. RECOMMENDATIONS The Municipal Licensing and Standards Division recommends that the Etobicoke York Community Council: 1. Refuse the request for an exemption submitted by the property owner of 364 Evans Avenue to maintain the existing 3.1 metres (~10.1 feet) high corrugated metal fence in the flankage and rear yard and the 1.9 meters (~6 feet) high chain link fence in the front yard as this is in violation of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences with respect to height and construction requirements; 2. Refuse the request for an exemption submitted by the property owner of 364 Evans Avenue for a proposed new 3.1 metres (~10.1 feet) high corrugated metal fencing in the rear yard and the barbed wire on the front yard gate as this is in

violation of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences, with respect to height and construction requirements; and 3. Direct that an unappealable Notice of Violation be issued under City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 Fences. Financial Impact The recommendations in this report have no financial impact. DECISION HISTORY An application for fence exemption was submitted by the property owner of 364 Evans Avenue. The fence is located along the perimeter of a property fronted on Evans Avenue and flanked by Kipling Avenue. Accordingly, all property owners within a 60 meter radius of 364 Evans Avenue have been notified by the City Clerk's office of the date that the application for exemption will be considered by the Etobicoke York Community Council (Attachment 1). ISSUE BACKGROUND The subject fence is located at 364 Evans Avenue and owned by R J McCarthy Holding Inc. The site, located within an industrial area is tenanted by ML Lumber and Building Supplies and is being operated as a building supply yard. Upon investigation it was discovered that the property was in contravention of the Zoning By-law due to the open storage of raw materials and setbacks. The investigation also determined violations to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences (TMC 447). Subsequently, the owners and operators were issued Notices of Violation. The applicant responded by submitting a request for a fence exemption (Attachment 3). The existing front yard chain link fence is 1.9 meters (~6 feet) high and runs approximately 117 meters (~384 feet), enclosing the front yard while the existing fencing along the west lot line flankage yard is approximately 140 metres (~559 feet) from the front yard to the rear lot line and is composed of two parallel fences, one of chain link material at 1.5 metres (~ 4.9 feet) high and another of corrugated metal at 3.1 metres (~10.1 feet) high. Along the north lot line rear yard, the chain link fence is 3.1 meters (10 feet) high and runs approximately 60 meters (~197 feet); the chain link fence along the east lot line rear yard is 1.9 meters (~6 feet) high for approximately 57 meters (~187 feet) from the front yard to the accessory building abutting the east lot line and 2.33 meters (~7.6 feet) high from the north end of the accessory building to the rear lot line for approximately 53 meters (~174 feet) (Attachments 4, 5, 6 and 7).

The proposed new fencing will replace the existing chain link fencing and is 2.5 meters (~8.2 feet) high corrugated metal, running north from the accessory building abutting the east lot line to and along the length of the rear lot line. The proposal also includes a section of 2.5 meters (~8.2 feet) high corrugated metal fencing dissecting the rear yard running between the east and west accessory buildings that abut the east and west lot lines. Additionally, the proposal includes a 1.9 metre (~ 6 feet) high chain link gate, located adjacent to the front wall of the main building, on the east side, includes an extension of three strands of barbed wire measuring 0.23 metres (~0.75 feet) from the top of the gate to the top strand (Attachments 7, 8, and 9). The Fence By-law requires that fencing erected in the front yard be maintained at a maximum height of 1.2 metres (~3.9 feet); the existing fencing is 0.7 metres (~2.3 feet) too high. Furthermore, the maximum fencing height permitted on non-residential properties in the flankage and rear yards is 2.5 metres (~8.2 feet); the existing west lot line, flankage yard fencing and the rear lot line and the north section of the east lot line fencing is 0.6 metres (~2 feet) too high. Furthermore, the use of corrugated metal in the existing fence and proposed fence construction, including the strands of barbed wire located at the top of the proposed front yard gate does not meet the construction and materials requirements of the By-law. COMMENTS The subject fence is in violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Fences with respect to height and construction. The applicant has indicated that the fence would provide the property with privacy, safety, noise and dust control. Should the staff recommendations not be accepted and the request by the applicant is approved, the following conditions of approval should include: 1. When the fence is replaced, it has to comply with the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law. CONTACT Gail Pryce, Acting Supervisor Municipal Licensing and Standards Etobicoke York District Tel: 416-396-7431 gpryce@toronto.ca

SIGNATURE Eletta Purdy, District Manager Municipal Licensing and Standards Etobicoke York District ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Plan showing properties within 60 meter radius of 364 Evans Ave Attachment 2: Ariel view of 364 Evans Ave Attachment 3: Site Plan Attachment 4: Photograph of Fence (view from Kipling Ave and Evans Ave) Attachment 5: Photograph of west lot line fence (view from Kipling Ave) Attachment 6: Photograph of east lot line, rear yard fence, north end Attachment 7: Photograph of east lot line, rear yard fence, south of accessory building Attachment 8: Fence Elevation west lot line at flankage yard Attachment 9: Fence Elevation - running east west between accessory buildings across rear yard Attachment 10: Fence Elevation showing gate with barbed wire

Attachment 1: Plan showing properties within 60 metre radius of 364 Evans Ave

Attachment 2: Ariel view of 364 Evans Ave Existing 3.1 metre (10 feet) high corrugated metal fence Existing 2.5 metre (8 feet) high corrugated metal fence Existing 2.3 metre (8 feet) high chain link fence Existing 1.9 metre (6 feet) high chain link fence

Attachment 3: Site Plan

Attachment 4: Photograph of Fence (view from Kipling Ave and Evans Ave) Attachment 5: Photograph of west lot line fence (view from Kipling Ave)

Attachment 6: Photograph of east lot line, rear yard fence, north end Attachment 7: Photograph of east lot line, rear yard fence, south of accessory building

Attachment 8: Fence Elevation west lot line at flankage yard Attachment 9: Fence Elevation - running east west between accessory buildings across rear yard

Attachment 10: Fence Elevation showing gate with barbed wire