CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEMS: J & K STAFF: NATALIE BECKER FILE NOS: CPC ZC QUASI-JUDICIAL CPC DP QUASI-JUDICIAL

Similar documents
CONSENT CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: A STAFF: STEVE TUCK FILE NO.: CPC CU QUASI-JUDICIAL

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REVIEW CRITERIA

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NOS: 15,16,17,18,19 STAFF: PATRICIA PARISH

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: G.1-G.3 STAFF: JAMES MAYERL

ITEM NO(S): B.1 B.3 STAFF: SHARON ROBINSON FILE NO(S): CPC CU QUASI-JUDICIAL CPC UV QUASI_JUDICIAL CPC NV QUASI-JUDICIAL

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NOS: B.1-B.3 STAFF: MEGGAN HERINGTON

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: Q STAFF: ANDREW FIRESTINE FILE NO: CPC CM QUASI-JUDICIAL

CPC Agenda July 18, 2013 Page 56 ITEM: E FILE NO: CORPORAT SITE

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS MEMORANDUM

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT

STAFF: RACHEL TEIXEIRA

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

(if more than one, give square footage for each) ANNEXATION LOT LINE Adjustments PRE/FINAL PLAT SPECIAL USE PERMIT

ARTICLE 8: SPECIAL LAND USES

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP

II. What Type of Development Requires Site Plan Review? There are five situations where a site plan review is required:

REVISED # Federal Drive Milestones Therapy Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

ARTICLE XI CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS

Chapter 22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I

Conditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC

# Alexander Leigh Center for Autism Final PUD and SUP Amendment Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT SUBMITTED TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. In the Matter of a Special Use Application. for Address: Board Calendar No.

Urban Planning and Land Use

Request for Decision STAFF REPORT. Recommendation. Applicant: Location: Application: Proposal: Presented To: Planning Committee

Town of Holly Springs Town Council Meeting Agenda Cover Sheet

8/17/16 PC Meeting 1

# Coventry Rezoning, Variation and Preliminary/Final PUD Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

Letter of Intent May 2017 (Revised November 2017)

City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/05/2014

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services

Appendix J - Planned Unit Development (PUD)

# Astro Spa Massage Special Use Permit Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012

Condominium Unit Requirements.

CITY OF BRIGHTON. Community Development/Planning Department SPECIAL LAND USE APPLICATION

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report. 956 W. Chatham Street. Town Council Meeting January 9, 2014

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION. ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT December 06, 2012

CITY OF NAPLES STAFF REPORT

Board of Zoning and Planning Members. Justin A. Milam, AICP, Planning Officer. Positive recommendation of a rezoning to City Council.

5.03 Type III (Quasi-Judicial) Decisions

Special Land Use. SLU Application & Review Standards

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Guide to Preliminary Plans

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 13-REZ-31 Weston PDD Amendment at Centregreen Park Town Council Meeting March 13, 2014

REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011

(b) The location of principal and accessory buildings on the lot and the relationship of each structure to the other.

Georgetown Planning Department Staff Report

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

DIVISION 1 PURPOSE OF DISTRICTS

ORDINANCE NO. City Attorney Synopsis

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA

ARTICLE IV DISTRICT REGULATIONS

# New Directions Addiction Recovery Services Special Use Permit Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

ARTICLE IX - SIDEWALK REGULATIONS

CITY OF PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 18, 2015 AGENDA BUCKY S CONVENIENCE STORES SPECIAL USE PERMIT SUP

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance

Moore Township Planning Commission 2491 Community Drive, Bath, Pennsylvania Telephone: FAX: Rev:12/23/2013

In order to permit maximum applicability of the PUD District, PUD-1 and PUD-2 Districts are hereby created.

Financial Impact Statement There are no immediate financial impacts associated with the adoption of this report.

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT MCDONALD S ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT VARIANCES

PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

Special Exception Use Order Application

3390, 3392, 3394, 3396 and 3398 Bayview Avenue - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Be linked by an internal circulation system (i.e., walkways, streets, etc.) to other structures within the IPUD;

STAFF REPORT FOR THE CITY OF GOOSE CREEK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

ARTICLE 13 CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS

Zoning Variances. Overview of

PERMITTED USES: Within the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District the following uses are permitted:

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: October 19, 2017

4.2 LAND USE INTRODUCTION

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT MAY TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENT. A. Purpose

1. Allow a workable, interrelated mix of diverse land uses;

GWINNETT COUNTY CSO CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS

CHAPTER 5. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

Paul D. Ralph, BES, RPP, MCIP, Commissioner, Development Services Department

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

CITY OF TYLER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF COMMENTS

Transcription:

Page 92 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEMS: J & K STAFF: NATALIE BECKER FILE NOS: CPC ZC 05-00151 - QUASI-JUDICIAL CPC DP 05-00152 - QUASI-JUDICIAL PROJECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: MERCURY CAR WASH SCOTT PALING (MARTIN/MARTIN) DAN ROBERTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The property at 2010 South Murray Boulevard consists of 1.49 acres and is located at the northeastern corner of Academy Boulevard and Murray Boulevard (FIGURE 1). The property is currently undeveloped with a zoning designation of OC/NP (Office Complex with Navigational Preservation Overlay). The proposed project is to construct a car wash facility during phase one of the site development and a standalone restaurant during phase two of the site development process. The current OC (Office Complex) zoning does not permit a car wash facility so the applicant has requested the property be rezoned to PBC (Planned Business Center) to accommodate this proposed use. STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION: ITEM: J CPC ZC 05-00151 CHANGE OF ZONING Approve the zone change from OC/NP (Office Complex with Navigation Preservation Overlay) to PBC/NP (Planned Business Center with Navigation Preservation Overlay), based upon the findings that the Change of Zoning request complies with the three criteria for granting of zone changes as set forth in Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 603.B of the City Zoning Code. ITEM: K CPC DP 05-00152 DEVELOPMENT PLAN Approve the Mercury Car Wash Development Plan, based upon the findings that the Development Plan meets the review criteria for development plans as set forth on Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 502.C. of the City Zoning Code. SUMMARY: All criteria are met for these three requests that will permit the construction of a car wash, restaurant, and associated parking lot.

Page 93 BACKGROUND: SEE FIGURE 2 (SURROUNDING LAND USES) Existing Zoning/Land Use - OC NP (Office Complex with Navigation Preservation Overlay) Surrounding Zoning/Land Use - North - PBC (Planned Business Center) Hollywood Video South - OC (Office Complex) vacant land East - OC (Office Complex) vacant land West - PBC (Planned Business Center) commercial center Annexation April, 1971 Pikes Peak Addition # 10 Subdivision Lot 4 Block 1 Gateway Subdivision Filing Number 23 Physical Characteristics Vacant, unimproved land Master Plan Not Applicable DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS: FIGURE 3 (REVIEW LETTER 11/8/2005) City Engineering See attached review letter (comments were addressed) Transportation Planning See attached review letter (comments were addressed) Landscape See attached review letter (comments were addressed) Gas/Electric See attached review letter (comments were addressed) Water/Wastewater See attached review letter (comments were addressed) Police Comments addressed Transit No comments Fire - Standard comments # 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 12, 13, 20, and 21 U.S. Post Office No comments Parks- No comments All Other Reporting Departments - Standard or no comments. PETITIONER'S JUSTIFICATION: FIGURE 4 STAKEHOLDER PROCESS: The public process involved with the review of these applications included the posting of the site, and distribution of letters on two separate occasions to all property owners within a 1,000 feet radius of the property. ANALYSIS OF MAJOR ISSUES: ZONE CHANGE REVIEW CRITERIA: In accordance with City Zoning Code Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 603.B, a proposal for a change of zone classification may be approved by the City only if the following findings are made: 1. The action will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or general welfare. The vacant property is currently zoned OC/NP. The existing property is located to the east of Academy Boulevard to the west of South Murray Boulevard. The property to the north is zoned PBC and is currently being used as a Hollywood Video store. The owner would like to build a car wash facility and stand alone restaurant on the current vacant parcel of land and change the zone from OC NP to PBC NP. The car wash facility and restaurant would be compatible uses to the adjacent Expressway (Academy) and the existing PBC zoned property to the north (FIGURE 2). The proposed project will provide a cross access easement between the existing PBC zoned property at 1976 S Murray Boulevard and the future car wash facility and restaurant at 2010 S Murray Boulevard. The proximity to existing commercial uses and Academy Boulevard makes this property an excellent candidate for the PBC zone.

Page 94 2. The proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the City Comprehensive Plan. This property is considered a type of infill development, which is encouraged in the City s Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Policy 401). It is the finding of the Planning Staff that the zone change proposal will not be detrimental to the public interest or the existing neighborhood, and conforms to the goals and policies of the City Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposal is consistent with the master plan for the area, in which the parcel is located, unless the master plan is deemed implemented. The master plan for this area is very old and is considered not applicable in determining the land use of this parcel. DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA: In accordance with City Zoning Code Chapter 7, Article 5, Section 502.C, a Development Plan shall be reviewed for substantial conformance with the criteria found in said section. Further, no development plan shall be approved unless the plan complies with all the requirements of the zone district in which it is located, is consistent with the intent and purposes of the City Zoning Code and is compatible with the land uses surrounding the site. 1. Will the project design be harmonious with the surrounding land uses and neighborhood? 2. Will the proposed land uses be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood? Will the proposed development overburden the capacities of existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities? 3. Will the structures be located to minimize the impact of their use and bulk on adjacent properties? 4. Will landscaping, berms, fences and/or walls be provided to buffer the site from undesirable views, noise, lighting or other off site negative influences and to buffer adjacent properties from negative influences that may be created by the proposed development? 5. Will vehicular access from the project to streets outside the project be combined, limited, located, designed and controlled to channel traffic to and from such areas conveniently and safely and in such a manner which minimizes traffic friction, noise and pollution and promotes free traffic flow without excessive interruption? 6. Will all the streets and drives provide logical, safe and convenient vehicular access to the facilities within the project? 7. Will streets and drives within the project area be connected to streets outside the project area in such a way that discourages their use by through traffic? 8. Will adequately sized parking areas be located throughout the project to provide safe and convenient access to specific facilities? 9. Will safe and convenient provision for the access and movement of handicapped persons and parking of vehicles for the handicapped be accommodated in the project design? 10. Will the design of streets, drives and parking areas within the project result in a minimum of area devoted to asphalt? 11. Will pedestrian walkways be functionally separated from vehicular traffic and landscaped to accomplish this? Will pedestrian walkways be designed and located in combination with other easements that are not used by motor vehicles? 12. Does the design encourage the preservation of significant natural features such as healthy vegetation, drainage channels, steep slopes and rock outcroppings? Are these significant natural features incorporated into the project design? The proposed Mercury Car Wash and stand-alone restaurant are compatible land uses with the surrounding area. The property is located at the northeastern corner of Academy Boulevard and S. Murray Boulevard and is adjacent to existing commercial uses. The property to the north of 2010 S. Murray Boulevard is a Hollywood Video store. The properties to the south and east are vacant and zoned for future Office Complex uses. The properties to the west are all zoned PBC and have been developed

Page 95 into commercial properties. The development of this property will not overburden the existing infrastructure. The design and placement of the car wash will minimize the impact of the use on the surrounding neighborhood. The car wash has been placed on the property so that people waiting to wash their cars will not block the adjacent public street, Murray Boulevard. The car wash facility is fully automated and takes 5 minutes for the car to be processed through the system (which includes washing and drying time). The proposed car wash facility will also provide some interesting architectural features as shown in FIGURE 5. The elevations for the future restaurant use will be provided during phase two of the development. The site will use full cut-off light fixtures to minimize light pollution to the surrounding area. The proposed project will have safe access from South Murray Boulevard and will be connected to the commercial property to the north. (The property owner will record a cross access easement with the property to the north to improve on-site traffic circulation.) The project will provide new 5 sidewalk along South Murray Boulevard and install a new city standard pedestrian ramp at the northeastern corner of Murray Boulevard and Academy Boulevard. The owner is also providing additional sidewalk connections from the public sidewalk into the proposed restaurant site. As part of the site design, van accessible parking spaces were provided in close proximity to the future restaurant entrance. There were no significant features, drainage channels, or steep slopes located on this property. The existing trees located to the east of Academy Boulevard, which were not located within the water/wastewater utility easement, were preserved. The proposed development project will provide additional landscaping along Academy and Murray Boulevard (See FIGURE 6 Final Landscape Plan). It is the finding of the Planning Staff that the proposed Development Plan for Mercury Car Wash will be in substantial compliance with said criteria for a Development Plan. Significant Modifications to the Development Plan: None. See FIGURE 7 (REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN) All city agency comments have been satisfactorily addressed with the resubmittal of the revised plans provided on 11/16/05. Technical and Informational Modifications to the Development Plan: None. See FIGURE 7(REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN) No technical or informational modifications to the development plan are necessary. All city review agency comments have been satisfactorily addressed as of 11/16/05.

Page 96

Page 97

Page 98

Page 99

Page 100

Page 101

Page 102

Page 103

Page 104

Page 105

Page 106

Page 107