DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING)

Similar documents
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING)

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PREMIER AUTO SERVICES, INC. VARIANCES

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT MCDONALD S ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT VARIANCES

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT VARIANCE AND WAIVER THE ROSALYNN APARTMENTS

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT BOJNANGLES SIGN VARIANCES

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EDISON AT EASTSIDE DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PUD/DCI BAINBRIDGE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DCI ATTIVA MALONE

VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET

Applicant Name: Parkside Partners, LLC Name of Project: Edison at Eastside Edison at Eastside Executive Summary Location: Site: Zoning: Former Interna

City of Hollywood Zoning and Land Development Regulations. Day Care Facilities. Plant Nursery & Garden Center. School,** public or private.

ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts


Letter of Intent for Application requested by 30AIP Chamblee, LLC (the Applicant )

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

THE CITY OF RAYMORE, MISSOURI Single-Family Residential Zoning Districts

30AIP CHAMBLEE, LLC CR Hwy. 30A West Bldg. M-1 Unit 228 Santa Rosa Beach, FL (850)

TOWNSHIP OF UPPER MACUNGIE LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. ORDINANCE NO [To be considered for Adoption June 1, 2017]

PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Annex, 66 Prospect St., Ridgefield, CT Fax

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 3, 2016

8.14 Single Detached with Granny Flat or Coach House Edgemere

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

ARTICLE 10 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS

Article 2. Rules of Interpretation

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

Min. Lot Frontage (Ft.) 1. Min. Front Yard (Ft.) Min. Rear Yard (Ft.) R , R , R ,

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

Coding For Places People Love Main Street Corridor District

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT CASE

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS. By Palmisano

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

The V Development Company, Inc. 297 E Paces Ferry Rd NE, Unit 1701 Atlanta, GA 30305

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

MEMORANDUM. DATE: April 6, 2017 TO: Zoning Hearing Board Jackie and Jake Collas. FROM: John R. Weller, AICP, Zoning Officer

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 58 Article 11: OS-ARC Office Service-Ann Arbor Road Corridor District ARTICLE XI OS-ARC

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

O-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9

. \. structure. portion of a. yard setback. in height. for that. above 45 ft. structure above. 20-ft. front. 2, additional.

Unified Development Ordinance. Chamblee Chamber of Commerce Meeting May 21, 2015

ARTICLE 5.0 SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

2.35 BVT G Bow Valley Trail General Commercial District [ ]

Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, June 13, 2016

3 3 MIXED-USE DISTRICTS

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

the conditions contained in their respective Orders until January 1, 2025, at the discretion of the Director of Planning, Property and Development.

2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.

NEW BUSINESS. Aerial Map. Case #11-1. Neighborhood Context

Section 6 Residential (R3) Zone

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS

SECTION 10.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES

Chapter 10 RD TWO-FAMILY (DUPLEX) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE

ZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: September 15, 2011

Community Development Department Frequently Asked Questions

Planning Commission Report

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016

SECTION 822 "R-1-A" AND "R-1-AH" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

CITY OF NAPLES STAFF REPORT

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND BYLAW NUMBER 2065, A Bylaw to Amend Zoning Bylaw Number 1375, 1996

When do I need a building permit?

CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ARTICLE 67. PD 67. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this

ARTICLE 50. PD 50. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT August 18, 2016

2ND DISCUSSION DRAFT 3 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

(a) Commercial uses on Laurel Avenue, abutting the TRO District to the

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR

SECTION 10: COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11

CHAPTER 29 ARTICLE 8. 20,000 sf 30,000 sf 100,000 sf (with approval by Special Use Permit according to Sec

Town Center South End Development Area District

ZONING AMENDMENT, SUBDIVISION & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 16, 2006

CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND

STAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting date: May 11, 2016 Item: VN Prepared by: Marc Jordan

Accessory Coach House

Article 4 Lot and Building Standards

ARTICLE 7 R-1 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Merrimac PLNSUB Planned Development 38 West Merrimac November 9, Request. Staff Recommendation

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017

Town of Scarborough, Maine

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

Permitted uses. Adult congregate living facility. Ambulance service. Animal clinics (outpatient care only and no overnight boarding)

City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application

6A. In ALL Residence zones, no building or land shall be used and no building or structure shall be erected or altered except for the following uses:

DISCUSSION DRAFT 3 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Transcription:

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 10, 2018 Item #: PZ2018-266 STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING) Request: Ten variances and three waivers for a veterinary clinic Project Name: Crescent Animal Hospital Site Address: 5441, 5433, 5435, 5437 Peachtree Road Parcel Number: 18-299-16-046, 047, 051, 049 Applicant: Shawn Rainey, Blue Frog LLC; Dr. Robin Hochel, DVM Owner: John Lentini, Heritage Properties Development, LLC Proposed Development: Renovate existing commercial building for a veterinary clinic Current Zoning: Village Commercial (VC): This zoning district is intended primarily for mixed-use development and related uses at a higher density. This district provides a location for residences, retail, goods, services and offices to satisfy the common and frequent needs of the City's commercial core and greater Chamblee area. Design standards and design parameters encourage a pedestrian-friendly traditional urban form, oriented to pedestrians, which limits the conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians. Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL with conditions in part and DENIAL in part District Standards: VC Zoning District (Primary Street) (Storefront Street) Total FAR (max) 4.0 Front Yard Setback 0 ft Building Coverage (max) 80% Rear Yard Setback 0 ft Open Space (min) 20% Side Yard Setback 0 ft Building Height (min)(max) 18 ft/ 75 ft Landscape Zone 5 ft Lot Size (min) N/A Sidewalk Clear Zone 10 ft Lot width (min) N/A Supplemental Zone 8 ft Current Use: Retail antique sales Surrounding Land Uses: West VC: Mixed-use development with Heritage Lofts residential condominiums and Vintage Pizza; Commercial offices East VC: Southern Railroad right-of-way, railroad; MARTA rail North VC: Retail antique sales, Early Times Antiques South VC: Vacant gravel parking lot owned by Southern Railroad Regular City Council Meeting: 05/15/2018 1 of 7

Site Description: The subject property consists of four parcels, totaling 0.34 acres, located on the south side of Peachtree Road between American Industrial Way and Broad Street. The Southern railroad tracks and MARTA rail tracks are located to the east (rear) of the property. The parcels are zoned Village Commercial (VC), and are all under the same ownership. The property contains one primary building, an approximately 2,100 square foot commercial building constructed in 1930. The front portion of the building is masonry block and the rear portion is wood. The building is commonly referred to as the Ice House because it was once home to a business that supplied ice to the naval base located at the site of what is now Peachtree DeKalb Airport. The name Ice House appears on the parapet above the canopy on the front of the building. The finished floor elevation of the masonry, front portion of the building sits approximately 3 feet and 4 inches higher than the wooden, rear portion. A covered porch with stairs provides customers with access to the front of the building. There is currently no ADA access through the front of the building, although the south side of the building is accessible at the same grade as the parking lot. The building is currently occupied by Way Back When Antiques. The property also contains the Frosty Caboose, an accessory structure consisting of a small rail car converted into an ice cream shop, which opened in 2009, and a paved parking lot. The property is fairly flat and level, gradually sloping down approximately three feet from the south to the north of the site. The four parcels share a single curb cut. The property is sparsely landscaped. There is a planting bed of flowering plants located at the head of the parking spaces that abut the building, and there are several large wooden planters that contain small landscape trees throughout the site. The site contains several mature hardwood trees. There is not a MARTA bus stop along the frontage, however the site is a short walk, approximately just less than one-half mile, from the MARTA rail station entrance and MARTA bus station. Description of Proposed Project: The project calls for: Combining the four parcels into a single lot through the plat process Interior renovations to convert the space to a veterinarian clinic, and for ADA compliance. Exterior renovations including replacing the wooden portion of the building with hardi board lap siding, adding a parapet to the rear portion of the building, painting, adding an HVAC unit on the roof, screening both rooftop units, installing a new roof, gutter and downspouts, installing a new covered entry on the south elevation toward the rear of the building to provide customer access from the parking lot, updating the front porch, replacing some windows, removing windows on the sides, and adding a new window on the rear facade. Site upgrades for ADA compliance and aesthetics, and restriping the parking lot Installation of a six-foot-tall privacy fence to create a fenced-in dog walk area in the side yard along the north façade of the building. The Frosty Caboose is proposed to remain as-is. The project triggers full compliance with the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), due to exceeding the 70% redevelopment threshold. Regular City Council Meeting: 05/15/2018 2 of 7

Applicant s Variance Requests: The applicant requests variances from the following regulations of the UDO: 1. Variance from Sec. 230-9(f) to not implement sustainability measures; 2. Variance from Sec. 230-26 to not install the required streetscape; 3. Variance from Sec. 230-29(b)(1) to reduce the required minimum first-floor floor-to-ceiling height of a building on a storefront street from 18 feet to 11 feet and 5 inches; 4. Variance from Sec. 230-27(a)(2) to not provide the required fenestration; 5. Variance from Sec. 240-13(b)(43) to allow a veterinary clinic to be located within 100 feet from a residential use, at approximately 78 feet; 6. Variance from Sec. 230-13 (b)(43) to allow for a fenced-in outdoor dog run; 7. Variance from Sec. 250-2(a)(3)(b) to allow five parking spaces which exceed the minimum required parking space count to not be grasscrete or grasspave; 8. Variance from Sec. 250-20 to not provide a loading space; 9. Variance from Sec. 250-21 from the dumpster enclosure material requirements and for the dumpster to encroach the required setback; 10. Variances from Ch. 260 to allow noncompliant signage to remain on an accessory structure. Staff Analysis: The UDO, in Section 280-16(b)(2), provides the following factors for granting a variance from UDO requirements. The analysis of these factors is included below: a. There are extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular property in question because of its size, shape or topography; The property currently consists of four separate parcels. The applicant proposes to combine the four parcels into a single, 0.38 acre, lot, which is the subject property. There are no extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the subject property in question because of its size, shape or topography. The property is slightly irregular in shape, meaning the opposing lot lines are not parallel to each other, however there is nothing extraordinary or exceptional about the size, shape, topography, or other characteristics of the property. b. The application of this zoning ordinance to the particular piece of property would create an unnecessary hardship; The project calls for the adaptive re-use of an existing building that was constructed in the 1930 s. The property is located within 100 linear feet from a residential use, the Heritage Lofts condominiums located across Peachtree Blvd, above and behind Vintage Pizzeria. There are no hardships created by the application of the sections of the zoning ordinance for which the applicant has requested variances. Particularly, there is no hardship created by Sec. 240-13(b)(43), which does not allow a veterinary clinic to be located within 100 feet from a residential use. There are many commercial lots in the same zoning district and other zoning districts that allow the proposed use and are not located within 100 ft of a residential use. Regarding the accessory Regular City Council Meeting: 05/15/2018 3 of 7

structure, although the Frosty Caboose is not within the proposed scope of work, it is also required to come into compliance with current regulations, which includes signage. The roof sign and excess of menu board signage are noncompliant. No real hardship exists as to why the structure could not be made compliant. c. Such conditions are peculiar to the particular piece of property involved; As addressed in criteria one, above, there are no extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular property in question because of its size, shape or topography. The conditions of the subject property are common throughout the City s urban areas. One uncommon site feature is the presence of a permanent accessory structure, the Frosty Caboose, in the front yard. Peculiar to the site and other properties along the south frontage of Peachtree Rd in this area is the fact that the City, in 2017, installed new streetscape improvements in the right-of-way, and the fact that there is an adopted plan for additional streetscape improvements to both sides of the street. d. Such conditions are not the result of any actions of the property owner; and The need for variances from the requirements of the UDO is the result of the applicant s desire to develop the site to an extent which triggers full compliance with the UDO, and which does not meet all of the UDO regulations. As addressed in criteria one, above, there are no extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular property in question because of its size, shape or topography. e. Relief, if granted, would not cause substantial detriment to the public good nor impair the purposes or intent of this zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance, Title 2 of the UDO, is enacted for purposes that include, but are not limited to, encouraging an aesthetically attractive environment, both built and natural, and to provide for regulations that protect and enhance these aesthetic considerations; protecting the environmental integrity of the City; improving the City's appearance; and encouraging the most appropriate use of land, buildings and other structures throughout the City. The VC zoning district provides a location for residences, retail, goods, services and offices to satisfy the common and frequent needs of the City's commercial core and greater Chamblee area. Veterinary services, much like medical services, serve to satisfy a common and frequent need of residents. So long as design standards and design parameters that encourage a pedestrian-friendly traditional urban form can be maintained, the proposed use should be compatible with the subject zoning district, and with the UDO. The proposed use is not a boarding kennel for animals, it is a veterinary clinic that provides routine veterinary services and surgeries. Relief from the UDO regulations for which the variances are requested, if granted, would not cause substantial detriment to the public good. As to whether Regular City Council Meeting: 05/15/2018 4 of 7

some of the variance requests would impair the purposes or intent of the zoning ordinance is more debatable. A variance from Sec. 240-13(b)(43) to allow a veterinary clinic to be located within 100 feet from a residential use could be granted without impairing the purposes or intent of the zoning ordinance. Per the UDO, the distance is measured from lot line to lot line, at the closest two points. This is approximately 78 feet. However, the two buildings are actually approximately 144 feet apart. The applicant has proposed that the inside of the building will be sound-proofed so as to prevent the outward emission of animal sounds. This is achievable, provided that the animal cages are kept in the wooden, rear portion of the structure, the outwardly visible presence of animals is kept to a minimum and any outdoor areas where animals would be walked are confined to areas further away from the residential units, and the entrance for pets and pet-owners is away from the front. Variances from Sec. 230-26 to not install the required landscape strip, sidewalk, and supplemental zone would not impair the purposes or intent of the zoning ordinance. However, there is opportunity for the unused paved area located between the primary building and the sidewalk to be transformed into a pedestrian-friendly area that meets the intent of the supplemental zone regulations. A variance from Sec. 230-29(b)(1) to reduce the required minimum first-floor floor-to-ceiling height of a building on a storefront street from 18 feet to 11 feet and 5 inches would not impair the purposes or intent of the zoning ordinance. The applicant has proposed to increase the height of the rear portion of the building and to add parapets on the sides. The overall effect will be the appearance of a taller building. The sustainability measures in Sec. 230-9(f) were recently adopted by Mayor and City Council. A variance to not implement the measures would impair the purpose of the zoning ordinance to protect the environmental integrity of the City. A variance from Sec. 230-27(a)(2) to not provide the required fenestration would not impair the purposes or intent of the zoning ordinance, provided the storefront character of the building is maintained, and the amount of existing fenestration are maintained, at a minimum. The applicant proposes to keep the wooden dumpster enclosure as-is. The regulation that requires dumpsters to be enclosed is to promote safety, health and also aesthetics. The existing enclosure is a wooden structure that much in need of repair. The structure does not meet setbacks with the east lot line, which is adjacent to Southern Railroad right-of-way. A variance would not impair the purposes or intent of the zoning ordinance provided that the aesthetic element is met. The applicant states that loading activities will be very minimal and of a nature that would not cause a negative impact on access to parking or pedestrian circulation. A variance from Sec. 250-20 to not provide a loading space would not impair the purposes or intent of the zoning ordinance. Regular City Council Meeting: 05/15/2018 5 of 7

A variance from Sec. 230-13 (b)(43) to allow for a fenced dog run, would not impair the purposes or intent of the zoning ordinance, if the area can be confined towards the rear of the lot, so that it does not negatively impact the pedestrian-friendly, traditional urban form that is sought for the VC zoning district. Were the fenced-in dog walk area to be located in the side yard, and no closer to the front of the lot than where the building transitions from wood to brick, this should be sufficient. A variance from Sec. 250-2(a)(3)(b) to allow parking spaces above the minimum required parking space count to not be grasscrete or grasspave, however would not impair the purposes or intent of the zoning ordinance, provided the applicant provides green space in other areas in and around the parking lot. A variance for the Frosty Caboose from the sign regulations, Ch. 260 of the UDO, if granted, would not cause substantial detriment to the public good nor impair the purposes or intent of this zoning ordinance. Applicant s Waiver Requests: The project requires approval of waivers with respect to the requirements of the UDO. Only in situations as described in Section 300-13, where, because of severe topographical or other conditions peculiar to the site, strict adherence to the provisions of Title 3 of the UDO would cause an unnecessary hardship that is not caused by the owner, the Mayor and City Council may, after considering the written recommendation of the Development Director, authorize a waiver from the terms of Title 3 only to the extent that is absolutely necessary and not to an extent which would violate the intent of Title 3. The applicant requests WAIVERS from the following regulations of Title 3 of the UDO: 1. Waiver from Sec. 350-2 for the driveway width to remain as-is. 2. Waiver from Sec. 320-39 for the tree density to remain as-is. 3. Waiver from Sec. 350-2(c) to not provide inter-parcel access to adjacent lots. Peculiar to the site and other properties along the south frontage of Peachtree Rd in this area is the fact that the City, in 2017, installed new streetscape improvements in the right-of-way. The driveway width was left as-is when the City performed the improvements, and bringing it into compliance is unnecessary at this time, although there is no actual hardship. There is no hardship unique to the site for not coming into compliance with the City s tree ordinance. If the site will be deficient in tree density, then the applicant has options to plant trees on-site to obtain compliance, or to pay into the City s tree fund. Inter-parcel access easements should be required for future connectivity to both abutting lots from the rear of both side lot lines of t subject lot. Staff Recommendations: Based on the analysis of this application, using the variance standards and criteria found in Chapter 280 and waiver criteria found in Chapter 300 of the UDO, Staff recommends APPROVAL of the following variances and waivers in application PZ-2018-266. Regular City Council Meeting: 05/15/2018 6 of 7

1. A variance from Sec. 230-9(f) to not implement sustainability measures; 2. A variance from Sec. 230-26 to not install the required streetscape; 3. A variance from Sec. 230-29(b)(1) to reduce the required minimum first-floor floor-to-ceiling height of a building on a storefront street from 18 feet to 11 feet and 5 inches; 4. A variance from Sec. 240-13(b)(43) to allow a veterinary clinic to be located within 100 feet from a residential use, at approximately 78 feet; 5. A variance from Sec. 230-13 (b)(43) to allow for a fenced-in outdoor dog run; 6. A variance from Sec. 250-2(a)(3)(b) to allow five parking spaces which exceed the minimum required parking space count to not be grasscrete or grasspave; 7. A variance from Sec. 250-20 to not provide a loading space; 8. Variances from Ch. 260 to allow an existing roof sign and existing menu signage to remain on an accessory structure. 9. Variances from Ch. 260 to allow noncompliant signage to remain on an accessory structure. 10. A variance from Sec. 250-21 to reduce the setback from the rear lot line from five feet to approximately one foot. 11. A waiver from Sec. 350-2(c) to not provide inter-parcel access to adjacent lots. 12. A waiver from Sec. 350-2 for the driveway width to exceed the maximum width of 24 feet, to remain at approximately 29 feet in width. Staff recommends DENIAL of the waiver and variance requests because the requests fail to meet the criteria for approval found in Chapter 280 or Chapter 300. 13. A variance from Sec. 250-21 from the dumpster enclosure to not meet the regulations for dumpster enclosure materials; 14. A waiver from Sec. 320-39 for the tree density to remain as-is. Staff recommends that a motion to approve any of the variances referenced above include the following general conditions and exhibits: Conditions: Exhibit A: Site Plan and Elevations, dated received April 9, 2018 Condition 1. A privacy fence for a dog walk area shall be allowed to be installed in the approximate location shown in Exhibit A, but shall be located no closer to the front lot line than the rear wall of the masonry portion of the existing building. Condition 2. Veterinary staff shall walk canines in areas located outside the fenced-in dog walk area. Condition 3. A grassed landscape island with shrubs or other plantings shall be installed around the dumpster enclosure. Said landscaped area shall be a minimum of 200 square feet. Condition 4. The front of the building shall maintain a storefront-like appearance. This shall include a minimum amount of transparent fenestration no less in area than currently exists on the front façade. The front porch and the paved area located between the front porch Regular City Council Meeting: 05/15/2018 7 of 7

and the sidewalk shall be reserved as passive open space through a public access easement. No more than half of this area shall consist of pervious surfaces. Condition 5. The applicant shall install an endcap landscape island in the paved area around the square planter located in the front of the lot between the building and the driveway. The required bicycle rack shall be installed on a concrete pad in this island, directly behind, and adjacent to the existing sidewalk. Condition 6. The applicant shall achieve a minimum of three points toward sustainability measures. Condition 7. Canines shall not be placed in cages within the masonry portion of the building. Condition 8. Applicant shall submit to the Development Department, prior to issuance of a building permit, that soundproofing of the structure is sufficient to prevent noises from animals from being heard at the public-right-of-way. Attachments: Attachment 1 Exhibit A: Site Plan and Elevations, dated received April 9, 2018 Attachment 2 Application and Letter of Intent Attachment 3 Location Maps Regular City Council Meeting: 05/15/2018 8 of 7