City of BRINDISI Italy (partner in cash Network) URBACT II Capitalisation Process 2012 coordinator (Municipality) : arch. V. COSTANTINO scientific coordinator (University): prof. F. GIRASANTE coordinator (University) : prof. G. PANARELLI coordinator LSG : arch. B. ATTOMA PEPE The role of energy efficiency buildings in managing social housing retrofitting Gianmichele Panarelli, Ph.D. Professor in Project Management Department of Engineering University of Chieti-Pescara (Italy) Experiences from Brindisi WORKSTREAM 6 BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN EUROPEAN CITIES 2 nd Core Group Meeting and Witness Hearing
CASH Cities Action for Sustainable Housing Project The ambition of the CASH project is to propose new solutions and promote new policies for the sustainable renovation of social and affordable housing units in the European Union. CASH is a network of 11 partners (10 cities and one region) led by Echirolles City. As a contribution to Climate Change issue, the network seeks to reduce the energy consumption of buildings and in buildings. It looks for new solutions to renovate social and affordable housing units, in order to improve their energy efficiency (EE) and to influence users behavior through citizens involvement. Development phase (25.11.2009-18.07.2010) - Partners have exchanged on their diagnosis, experience and best practices on the subject, during a Peer review consisting in joint visits to each city and have elaborated with the Lead expert a baseline study. Implementation phase (19.07.2010 19.01.2013) Through the organization of 6 thematic seminars on renovation and EE and through the elaboration of local action plans with local support groups created for that purpose, partners will exchange and provide knowledge, experimental and technical know-how. Major outputs will be a global guideline on energy efficient renovation of social housing Cities Advices for Sustainable Housing dedicated to European cities and professionals (including technological, legal, financial, governance, management aspects) and a compendium of cities actions with pilot projects and actions in course and planned Cities Actions for Sustainable Housing. http://urbact.eu/en/projects/low-carbon-urban-environments/cash/homepage/
General overview Paradiso District (case study) Brindisi (IT) Apartments 1.226 Population 6.758 Surface 70,39 km 2 PARADISO district Old town Density 96,15 inh/km 2
Paradiso district
Deterioration analysis Deterioration Medium High Environmental Space to redevelop Historic building in a state of neglect
Players (actors with the Municipality) IACP Istituto Autonomo Case Popolari Born in 1903 after Law 251, it had his golden age between World Wars, when the need of social housing was very high. It has offices in each city, even the smallest, and it has been charged to manage the housing stock of other public companies after their suppression. INA casa Istituto Nazionale Assicurazioni In 1949, INA starts the most important project to build social houses, also to help italian contractors after the WWII. In 14 years, until 1963, INA Casa builds 350.000 apartments in 5.000 cities. INCIS Istituto Nazionale Case Impiegati dello Stato Born in the early XX century, INCIS provides apartments for public employment, it was suppressed in 1973 and his stock housing has been managed by IACP.
Management Built by IACP (Istituto Autonomo Case Popolari) 747 apartments Now managed by IACP 479 apartments Built according to different housing policies during fourty years, Paradiso is for social housing IACP ex INA Casa ex INCIS ex 640 ex Demanio
Indicators IACP three stories buildings 232 IACP four stories buildings 345 IACP six stories buildings 170 INA Casa three stories buildings 111 INA Casa four stories buildings 61 Ex Demanio three stories buildings 156 Ex INCIS two stories buildings 61 Ex 640 90 Total amount 1226 year 1961 88 1962 126 1963 117 1964 210 1965 109 1967 254 1970 1 1974 8 1980 1 2004 170 Size(m²) Number of units Rooms Number of units Surface range: Number: 30-40,9 m2 16 3,5 2 41-50,9 m2 60 4 49 51-60,9 m2 45 4,5 62 61-70,9 m2 99 5 158 71-80,9 m2 305 5,5 146 81-90,9 m2 166 6 296 91-100,9 m2 264 6,5 117 101-110,9 m2 45 7 147 121-130,9 m2 13 7,5 170 Source: IACP / Brindisi Istituto Autonomo Case Popolari 8 33 8,5 9 9 21 10 1
IACP blocks _ via Renato Serra - 20 blocks - 384 apartments - from 76,1 m 2 to 90,1 m 2 - from 2 to 6 inh. - built 1964 to 1967 shots taken in august 2006
IACP blocks _ via Renato Serra shots taken in august 2006
project methodology Case study for ATER Lanciano (2004) experimental project. University "G. d 'Annunzio" of Chieti Pescara. Prof. G. Panarelli and others. Diagnostic step
Plans and elevation - present state typical floor ground floor Second floor plan South elevation
Plan - criticalities identified (character fruitive and typological ) small internal passages (and confused) nord Bedroom oversized and illuminating surface too small to provide even the minimum normative Small toilet and separates the living area Facing one-way does not guarantee that the air recirculation Illuminating surface insufficient small entrance
criticalities identified (energy efficiency) Weak thermal dispersions in the sub-system covers Strong heat loss through the structural elements Significant heat loss through the fixtures Significant heat loss in the vertical closures Significant heat loss through the closure elements
Decomposition of the construction system 1.a_VELETTA 1. Intonaco esterno cm 1 2. Laterizio forato cm 12 3. Cassonetto 1.b_SOTTODAVANZALE 1. Intonaco interno cm 1 2. Laterizio forato cm 12 3. Intercapedine d aria cm 10 4. Laterizio forato cm 8 5. Intonaco esterno cm 1 1.c_INFISSO 1. Telaio in ferro 2. Vetro cm 0,5 1.a_VELETTA 1. Intonaco esterno cm 1 2. Laterizio forato cm 12 3. Cassonetto 1.b_SOTTODAVANZALE 1. Intonaco interno cm 1 2. Laterizio forato cm 12 3. Intercapedine d aria cm 10 4. Laterizio forato cm 8 5. Intonaco esterno cm 1 1.c_INFISSO 1. Telaio in ferro 2. Vetro cm 0,5 1.e_BALCONE 1. Telaio in ferro 2. Pannelli di vetro cm 90x60 1.d 1. Intonaco interno cm 1 2. Laterizio forato cm 12 3. Intercapedine d aria cm 10 4. Laterizio forato cm8 5. Intonaco esterno cm 1 1.e_BALCONE 1. Parapetto in mutratura cm 8 2. Intonaco cm 1 3. Copertina in travertino cm 2 1.d 1. Intonaco interno cm 1 2. Laterizio forato cm 12 3. Intercapedine d aria cm 10 4. Laterizio forato cm8 5. Intonaco esterno cm 1
micro-urbanism analysis WORKSTREAM 6 - BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN EUROPEAN CITIES January February March April May June July August September October November December temperatures max _ C temperatures min _ C Rainy precipitations mm humidity relative _% sunshine duration _ h Spring Equinox h 12.00 Summer solstice h 12.00 Autumn Equinox h 12.00 Winter Solstice _h 12.00
Masterplan (project hypothesis) General indication 1. 2. 3. 1. Obstruct ventilation winter and encourage the summer 2. Let the sunshine in winter and create shelter in the shade in summer 3. Reuse of stormwater 4. Retroffitting for the existing buildings
Plan _ project Per il progetto, si è pensato di realizzare delle serre in ogni abitazione. Queste, sono spazi aggiuntivi aggettanti che hanno il compito di captare la massima radiazione solare. Essendo le temperature e il clima sempre piuttosto torridi, l elemento vetrato a nord favorisce un buon risultato per il surriscaldament o d inverno e la ventilazione d estate.
Sections _ project
Elevations _ project South elevation North elevation
project
project
The role of energy efficiency buildings in managing social housing retrofitting Experiences from Brindisi g.panarelli@unich.it graphic design Chiara DI MICHELE Manuel CAFAGNA WORKSTREAM 6. BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN EUROPEAN CITIES 2 nd Core Group Meeting and Witness Hearing