The Federal Reserve Bank Building

Similar documents
Rock Island County Courthouse History & Significance

GATEWAY AND CENTURY BUILDINGS. The Century Building

This report was written on September 1, 1983

510 MAIN STREET WINNIPEG CITY HALL Green Blankstein Russell and Associates (Bernard Brown and David Thordarson, principal designers),

Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet. Related District Number.

This report was written on 29 June 1990

The Addison Apartments

Hastings CBD Heritage Inventory Project

NEW HAMPSHIRE HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION LESSARD HOUSE NH STATE NO Second Avenue, Berlin, Coos County, New Hampshire

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Submitted to Fire Station 8 Working Group and Arlington County Public Library HOUSE AT 2211 NORTH CULPEPER STREET

Survey And Research Report On. Restormel. 829 Concord Road. Davidson, North Carolina

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

Kieran Boughan. San Francisco Architect RESIDENTIAL

Section 1. Appendix A, "Zoning" of the Code of the City of Charlotte is hereby amended as follows:

Re: TP , Flinders Street MELBOURNE, demolition and construction of 13 storey building.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALGARY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

20294 E. Maplewood Pl. Centennial, CO List Of Custom Property Features & Amenities

BACH HOUSE CORE TOUR. -Interpreters should be familiar with material at each stop, as they will operate on a rotating basis.

SECURITY BUILDING 117 NE 1 ST AVENUE

THE E. B. GRESHAM HOUSE

Uptown Greenwood. A Century of Growth and Re-Development. Railroads and Early Development

Wyman Historic District

SCHEDULE B. Comprehensive Mixed Use Sign and Awning Package Replacing Section VI.P.3 of the Redevelopment Plan As amended January 22, 2013

Architectural Narrative Columbia & Hawthorn responds to its unique location as a gateway to Little Italy and the Bay in several ways. 1. The visual ch

FORM A - AREA MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION MASSACHUSETTS ARCHIVES BUILDING 220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02125

The W. D. Beaty House

2. Name, address, and telephone number of the present owner and occupant of the property: The present owner of the property is:

Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - College Street Properties

460 MAIN STREET ROYAL BANK

KALORAMA 2230 massachusetts avenue, nw washington, dc 20008

NEW HAMPSHIRE HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION DINARDO-DUPUIS HOUSE NH STATE NO Wight Street, Berlin, Coos County, New Hampshire

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

90 ALBERT STREET WESTERN BUILDING

FORMER SHAUGHNESSY HOSPITAL

This report was written on Sept. 1, 2000

Criteria Evaluation: Landmark staff found that the structure application meets History Criteria 1a, and Architecture Criterion 2a and 2b.

Retail Space Available up to 50,000 SF at Pittsburgh s Iconic Corner of Fifth & Smithfield

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

City of Evanston Evanston Preservation Commission. Report to the City Council

NEW HAMPSHIRE HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION BICKFORD RENTAL HOUSE NH STATE NO First Avenue, Berlin, Coos County, New Hampshire

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Liberty-Valley Elementary School

Hastings CBD Heritage Inventory Project

This location map is for information purposes only. The exact boundaries of the property are not shown.

Built Heritage Inventory

Toronto Preservation Board Toronto East York Community Council. Acting Director, Policy & Research, City Planning Division

29 High Street, Summit, New Jersey

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

22 St. Thomas Street The Penthouse

BEFORE THE JACKSONVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ORDER GRANTING REOUEST FOR DEMOLITION

1615 EDGEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 180 ORLANDO, FL T: /F: Memorandum

COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

ONE SEAPORT SQUARE. Boston Civic Design Commission

Woodland Smythe Residence

Community Development Department Frequently Asked Questions

Municipality of Chatham-Kent. Legislative Services. Planning Services

When do I need a building permit?

CRAWFORD & STEARNS ARCHITECTS AND PRESERVATION PLANNERS

Learning Places Spring 2016 SITE REPORT Vinegar Hill, Revisited. Gerard Jitechian INTRODUCTION PRE-VISIT REFLECTION

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

F a r m s & E s t a t e s R e a l t y, I n c. P r e m i e r P r o p e r t i e s

320 Bay Street TORONTO ONTARIO. Tracy Macdonald Vice President,

Alamance County NORTH CAROLINA. LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION - Application -

Loveland Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report

luxury marine parade, bn2

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE27.20, adopted as amended, by City of Toronto Council on November 7, 8 and 9, 2017 CITY OF TORONTO

VIEW FROM CAMBIE STREET

NEW HAMPSHIRE HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION JOSEPH DUBE HOUSE NH STATE NO First Avenue, Berlin, Coos County, New Hampshire

Class A Office For Lease 8 West Third Street Winston-Salem, NC 27101

State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD

Back in the Loop. It was a place of refuge, of big shoulder pads and bad hair. In the 1980s, it

JOHN CALVIN WILSON HOUSE

Bruce I. Crabtree Architectural Photography Collection, ca ca. 1988

64 Fitzwilliam Square, Dublin 2

Registered Plan 84, Pari Lot 17 S, Part Lot 18 (civic address 110 Collingwood Street), also known as Inglewood, on May 17,2005;

136 MARKET AVENUE MARSHALL-WELLS HARDWARE WAREHOUSE HISTORICAL BUILDINGS COMMITTEE

Plymouth 163. Place (neighborhood or village)

Architectural Renderings. The following is intended to provide a preview of renovations and additions planned for McKinney High School.

74af ANTELOPE VALLEY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

Heritage Evaluation 51A, 53, 53A, 63, 65, 67 Mutual Street

This Paper was written by. Katherine Hillock. for the 2007 Spring Semester of the. Historic Preservation Studio Course

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

2054 University Avenue LLC

COURTHOUSES THAT FOLLOW the dictates of Brutalism

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Grosvenor House, Drury Lane, London, WC2. October 2003

Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet. Related District Number.

National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form

Architectural Inventory Form

Fig. 16 & 17 Left: Carved limestone detail. Right: Carved limestone and metal screen at main entrance on west elevation.

Appendix 1 OAS Real Estate Asset Location (GSB and Constitution Avenue Complex)

These design guidelines were adopted by: Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission on August 10, 2000 Knoxville Historic Zoning

Elm Street School. Description of Historic Place. Heritage Value of Historic Place

Infill & Other Residential Design Review

Powell Street. 840 Powell Street, #103 1 JOEL GOODRICH MALIN GIDDINGS Proudly presented by:

Architecture - Reaching for the Sky

Urban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London

Property Name Haxton-Griffin Farm Location Athens vic., Greene County, New York NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET

Transcription:

The Federal Reserve Bank Building This report was written on Feb. 1, 1984 1. Name and location of the property: The property known as the Federal Reserve Bank Building is located at 401 S. Tryon Street, in Charlotte, North Carolina.

2. Name, address and telephone number of the present owner of the property: The present owner of the property is: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 401 South Tryon Street Charlotte, NC 28202 Telephone: (704) 373-0200 3. Representative photographs of the property: This report contains representative photographs of the property. 4. A map depicting the location of the property: This report contains a map which depicts the location of the property.

Click on the map to browse 5. Current Deed Book Reference to the property: The most recent deed to this property is listed in Mecklenburg County Deed Book 3247 at page 583. The Tax Parcel Number of the property is: 125-052-08.

6. A brief historical sketch of the property: This report contains a brief historical sketch of the property prepared by Dr. William H. Huffman. 7 A brief architectural description of the property: This report contains an architectural description of the property prepared by Miss Lisa A. Stamper. 8. Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. 160A-399.4: a. Special significance in terms of its history, architecture, and/or cultural importance: The Commission judges that the property known as the Federal Reserve Bank Building does possess special significance in terms of Charlotte-Mecklenburg. The Commission bases its judgment on the following considerations: 1) the Federal Reserve Bank Building, erected in 1941-42 and designed by the Baltimore architectural firm of Taylor and Fisher is an especially striking local example of a blend of Art Moderne, Art Deco, and Neoclassical styles; 2) the Federal Reserve Bank Building illustrates and documents the importance of Charlotte as a regional banking and commercial center; and 3) the Federal Reserve Bank Building makes an especially important contribution to the integrity of the historic streetscape of South Tryon Street. b. Integrity of design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling and/or association: The Commission contends that the attached architectural description by Miss Lisa A. Stamper demonstrates that the Federal Reserve Bank Building meets this criterion. 9. Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal: The Commission is aware that designation would allow the owner to apply for an automatic deferral of 50% of the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of the property which becomes "historic property." The current appraised value of the 1.714 acres of land is $1,731,110. The current appraised value of the improvements is $3,615,800. The total current appraised value is $5,346,910. The property is zoned B3. Date of Preparation of this Report: February 1, 1984 Prepared by: Dr. Dan L. Morrill, Director Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Properties Commission 1225 S. Caldwell Street, Box D Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 Telephone: 704/376-9115

Historical Overview Dr. William H. Huffman September, 1983 The Federal Reserve Bank Building on South Tryon Street in Charlotte is literally and figuratively a monument to the city's importance as a regional commercial center. Starting in the 1880s and 90s as part of the growth of New South industrialization, Charlotte, which had been a cotton trading center before and immediately after the Civil War, became the center of booming textile manufacturing from the 1880s to the late 1920s. Driven by this sustained growth, the need for banking services also grew, and thus a branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was established in Charlotte on December 1, 1927. 1 Although it is commonly thought that the Federal Reserve system is a part of the U. S. Treasury Department, it is in fact a totally independent, quasi-government agency which was established by the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. Richmond was the first bank set up under the act in 1914, and today there are 12 main banks and 25 branches throughout the country. A Federal Reserve Bank is owned by its member financial institutions, and acts as a central bank to perform such functions as check clearing, transfer of currency between government agencies and member banks, research, and bank examinations. The Charlotte Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond was one of the last ones to be set up under the system, and was established primarily to serve the industrial Piedmont region of North and South Carolina. In Richmond's Fifth District, the only other branch is in Baltimore, Maryland. 2 On December 1, 1927, the Charlotte Branch opened for business on the 20th floor of the old First National Bank Building. In its first full year of operation in 1928, the bank handled nearly 6.6 million checks worth almost 1.7 billion dollars and received and shipped over 40 million dollars in currency. Just thirteen years later, in 1941, when the country was finally throwing off the effects of the Great Depression, the bank handled more than twice the number of checks with nearly three times the face value, and shipped 134 million dollars in currency to other banks. 3 By the end of the 1930s, it became apparent that the bank was going to need larger quarters, and in October, 1940, it purchased the property at the corner of South Tryon and Second Street for its own building. 4 The Baltimore architectural firm of Taylor and Fisher was retained to design the new bank building, and a local contraction business, the Southeastern Construction Company, was awarded the building contract. 5 Robert E. Lee Taylor (1882-1952), whose father was adjutant general to the famous head of the Confederate Army, was a graduate of the University of Virginia and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and practiced in Baltimore from 1917 to 1943. D. K. Este Fisher, Jr. (1892-? ) was educated at Princeton and MIT and was an organizing partner of Taylor and Fisher in 1927. Among other works, the firm designed a numbed of bank and federal buildings, including the former Baltimore Trust Building (for many years Baltimore's largest edifice), the Maryland National Bank, the U. S. Customs House, the Federal Land Bank Building, and the Federal Reserve Branch Bank, all in Baltimore. 6 Although the clouds of war were fast approaching, the U. S. was not directly involved in the fighting when construction began in 1941, but it was when the bank was completed early the

following year as a result of the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. On January 20, 1942, the Charlotte Branch opened for business in its new three-story, ancient-style building. 7 The exterior was fitted with a base of North Carolina granite topped by Indiana limestone, and the public lobby, with limestone walls and Tennessee marble floors and bronze doors, grilles and guard tower, were of classical style. 8 When the bank opened in its new location, the managing director was W. T. Clements, the cashier, Robert L. Cherry, and L. D. Brooks was assistant cashier. The directors were: D. W. Watkins, Director of Extension, Clemson College, S. C., George M. Wright, President, Republic Cotton Mills, Great Falls, S.C.; Charles L. Creech, Sr., Chairman, B. F. Huntley Furniture Co. and General Manager, Unique Furniture Makers, Winston-Salem, N.C.; B. M. Edwards, President, South Carolina National Bank, Charleston, S.C.; T. E. Hemby, Executive Vice President, American Trust Co., Charlotte; and J. Gerald Cowan, Vice-President, Wachovia Bank and Trust Co., Asheville, N.C. 9 In 1955-6, the original building was more than doubled in size by the addition of the fourth and fifth floors, and extending the building back sixty feet. This work was designed by the Charlotte firm of J. N. Pease and Co. and built by Goode Construction Company. 10 By 1970, continued need for expansion led the bank to acquire the land and building adjacent to the present site for an annex, 11 but it has been estimated that in the next thirty years, the bank will have to double its present capacity to meet the demands of business expansion in the Carolinas. For this next expansion, the present building will be refurbished or a new one will be built on a site owned by the bank, which is bounded by East Trade, South Caldwell, East Fourth, and South Davidson Streets. l2 Whatever direction the new construction takes, the present building will stand as a marker to over fifty years of service to the banking and business community, and its establishment and continued growth is a reflection of the economic climate of the Piedmont Carolinas in this century. NOTES 1 Brochure, Charlotte Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, undated, p. 4. 2 Ibid., p. 5; information provided by Public Services Department, Charlotte Branch. 3 Ibid. 4 Deed Book 1027, p. 17, 17 Oct. 1940. The price was $100,000. 5 Brochure, cited above, p. 2; plaque in entryway of building. 6 New York Times, June 23, 1952; Who Was Who, 1963, p. 564; American Architects Directory, 1970, p. 278; interview with Walter Shamu, Baltimore, Md., 22 Sept. 1983.

7 Charlotte Observer, Jan. 20, 1942, p. 5. 8 Brochure, cited above, p. 4. 9 Ibid., p. 6. 10 Entryway plaque; Federal Observer, April-May, 1954, p. (?); information provided by Public Services Department. 11 Deed Book 3247, p. 583, 15 Dec. 1970. 12 Charlotte News, Sept. 16, 1983, p. 6A. by Lisa A. Stamper January 18, 1984 Architectural Description The Charlotte Branch of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, established in 1927, grew rapidly as the Piedmont area it served prospered. By 1942, the bank moved into its newly constructed home on the corner of South Tryon and Second Streets. The three-story rectangular building was designed by the Baltimore based architectural firm of Taylor and Fisher, which tastefully blended Art Moderne, Art Deco, and Neoclassical Styles to create a prosperous and modern image for the banking institution. Fortunately, when increased work loads and cramped working conditions necessitated expansion, the Federal Reserve Bank chose to protect and enhance this image. In 1955-1956, two stories were added to the building, as well as a rectangular rear extension. Materials used on the South Tryon and Second Street facades were matched exactly to the original ones, and only the dimensions appear to be altered. By 1970, even more space was needed; therefore, the building adjacent to the bank was acquired, and a second-story enclosed walkway was constructed to link the two together. This building was given a new facade similar in design to the Federal Reserve Bank Building. The front facade, which graces South Tryon Street, is basically composed of two sections. The bottom section, which contains a tall first-story and a second-story, appears to be a single, heavy mass. The tall, first-story and the almost square second-story windows which flank the central, two-story entrance are slightly recessed within a single, tall, thin rectangle. The upper section, which appears to be lighter in mass, contains the third, forth, and fifth stories, and the visual division between stories is more obvious. The solidity of this section is broken by vertical fluted sections between the columns of windows. These sections are divided by a horizontal band decorated with the Greek key motif. The building is then crowned with a simple cornice and stout strip of vertical fluting.

The rest of the building has the same basic composition as the front facade. There are a few differences, however. Window openings are slightly smaller than those of the front facade, and they lack fluting in between. Also, the southern corner of the building, which is the rear extension, is of yellow-brick, not limestone. There are no first-story windows in the rear extension, and the other windows are not recessed. As is common in Neoclassic Style architecture, a few steps lead from the sidewalk up to the front entrance. This entry protrudes slightly from the rest of the building, and a simple, beveled surround contains a heavy first-story bronze double-door, bronze side panels, and a large rectangular window with a bronze grill of geometric design. During business hours, the heavy bronze doors are opened to reveal an elegant revolving glass door. Just beyond the revolving door is a small entryway which contains two stone plaques, one set into each limestone wall. One lists the original board of trustees, architect, construction and engineering firm, etc., while the other describes the 1955-1956 additions and the firms hired to complete the job. A glass double-door leads from the entryway into the lobby. Although original marble partitions have been removed and the floors carpeted, the rest of the Neoclassic architectural features of the lobby appear to be intact. Beautifully detailed limestone pilasters, Greek key and dentil limestone moldings, and even a brass guard tower still enrich the interior. Also, a plaque dedicated to the branch's World War II veterans is proudly displaced. Heavy wooden doors with brass fixtures lead to front executive offices and conference rooms. The ceiling has two tones of tile which are arranged to create rectangular designs. The executive offices and conference rooms are located on both sides of the entryway. These plush rooms exhibit heavy dentil mounding, plaster walls with wooden paneled wainscoting, wooden window frames and sills, and carpeted floors with occasional parquet flooring. Ceilings are of tile, as in the lobby. It appears as if these rooms have not been altered significantly since the early 1940's. Directly underneath the lobby's high guard tower is a brass security door. Behind this door is a hallway which accesses a stairwell (another stairwell is located at the opposite side of the building), the elevators, a vault, and a shipping dock. An employee entrance from Second Street leads into this hallway at the rear of the original building. The elevators are part of the 1950's extension, as is a shipping dock located at the rear. The shipping dock exterior entrance is also located on the Second Street side. Generally, the banking operations which require the most security take place in the rear extension. The rest of the building is used as office areas. These offices often are defined by permanent partitions, less than ceiling height, placed along a grid established by interior columns. It is difficult to determine whether or not finishes in these areas are original. Returning to the exterior of the Federal Reserve Building, bushes were planted at the base of the South Tryon Street facade and around the corner to continue partially down the Second Street facade. One pair of sculptured planters, which weary pedestrians use as benches, flank the public

entrance. A small, guarded parking area is located between the main building and the 1970's acquisition. The rear of the property is a fenced and guarded parking lot. Again, the Federal Reserve Bank must expand its facilities, and within the next few months will study various ways of doing so. Unofficially proposed alternatives range from building around the main bank building to moving operations to a site on Trade Street. Although it is not likely that the Federal Reserve, which cherishes its established image, will demolish the bank building, it is probable that the property will be sold. Thanks to Charlotte's branch of the Federal Reserve Bank, the city is still growing as a major banking center for the southwest. The "first home" of this branch bank is not only a portrayal of the Federal Reserve Bank, but also reflects its importance to Charlotte's banking community. Through excellent design and craftsmanship, plus the sensitivity to an architectural image, the Federal Reserve Bank Building is an unique contribution to the city's architectural as well as banking history.