r t h c t y w e s t * THESE PAGES REPLACE THE PAGES HAVING THE SAME PAGE NUMBER AS THOSE IN THE DEVELOPMENT UNIT 4A PLAN TEXT DATED OCTOBER 26, 1987.

Similar documents
TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

2030 General Plan. December 6, 7 pm

Exhibit D. Tallow Ridge PUD. Written Description. Date: January 5, E. City Development Number:

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

SECTION 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS

EXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD

Appendix J - Planned Unit Development (PUD)

CHAPTER34 PRUD - PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Town of Falmouth s Four Step Design Process for Subdivisions in the Resource Conservation Zoning Overlay District

Article Floating Zone Requirements

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

Belmead Neighbourhood Structure Plan

Memorandum City of Lawrence Planning & Development Services

RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to the following conditions:

Chapter 22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.

CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS

A. Location. A MRD District may be permitted throughout the County provided it meets the standards established herein.

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

Truax Park Apartments

4.1 Overview. 4.2 Land Use Plan

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

Development Program Report for the Alamo Area of Benefit

EXCERPT Planned Residential Development (PRD)

ARTICLE 12 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS (PUDS) Sec Intent CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON ZONING ORDINANCE

WHEREAS, the staff of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission recommended APPROVAL of the application with conditions; and

(a) Commercial uses on Laurel Avenue, abutting the TRO District to the

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I

Courtyards at Kinnamon Park Sketch Plan

ZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: August 8, 2013

Planned Unit Development (PUD). Sections:

Article 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Community Development

Clearcreek Township Zoning Staff Report Soraya Farms Section 6 Stage 3 Review Page 1 of 8

GROSVENOR-STRATHMORE METRO STATION MANDATORY REFERRAL APPLICATION NORTH BETHESDA, MD

Conditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PERMITTED USES: Within the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District the following uses are permitted:

Condominium Unit Requirements.

ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS

Memorandum City of Lawrence Planning Department

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 3, 2015

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Cobb County Community Development Agency Zoning Division 1150 Powder Springs St. Marietta, Georgia 30064

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

Initial Subdivision Applications Shall Include the Following:

Section Preliminary Plat Checklist and Application Forms

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 20, 2015

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 22, 2016

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

REPORT TO THE SHELBY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION From the Department of Development Services Planning Services. February 4, 2019

THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

ARTICLE 9 SPECIFICATIONS FOR DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

WIREGRASS RANCH DRI/MPUD MASTER ROADWAY PLAN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PDD DRC

Request Conditional Rezoning (AG-1 & AG-2 Agricultural to Conditional R-10 Residential & P- 1 Preservation District) Staff Recommendation Approval

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:

ARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT

SECTION 22 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT

County of Loudoun. Department of Planning and Zoning MEMORANDUM

4 June 11, 2014 Public Hearing

Rosslyn Sector Plan Implementation Zoning Ordinance Amendments. NAIOP Meeting April 13, 2016

RIVER VALE MASTER PLAN PZ CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING JULY 19, 2017 CITY OF BEND

STAFF SUMMARY FOR Z18-09 CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION

Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Community Development Department 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR 97321

STAFF REPORT. Guttman Development Group, LLC. PUD-R (Residential Planned Unit Development Plan)

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 18, 2017

1.0 Introduction. November 9, 2017

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

POLK COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE CASE OVERVIEW

SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

ARTICLE 13 CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS

ARTICLE 15. RULES, REGULATIONS AND DEFINITIONS

ARTICLE XXI GENERAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS

CITY OF FERNDALE HEARING EXAMINER

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

CHRIS ANARADIAN, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR BRETT BURNINGHAM, PLANNING ADMINISTRATOR; CHRISTINE SHEEHY, PRINCIPAL PLANNER

42-Acre Parcel Rezoning and Master Plan Amendment. Danny Cagle and Patrick Stanley 6301 Duckweed Rd. Lake Worth, FL 33449

Multifamily Development Land

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Affordable Housing Plan

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request.

Development Plan DP13-3 (Arlington Lofts) Planning and Zoning Meeting Date: Document Being Considered: Ordinance

Z-MAX BLVD HARRISBURG, NC OFFERING MEMORANDUM

Transcription:

n 0 r t h c i t y w e s t * THESE PAGES REPLACE THE PAGES HAVING THE SAME PAGE NUMBER AS THOSE IN THE DEVELOPMENT UNIT 4A PLAN TEXT DATED OCTOBER 26, 1987. Amendment Adopted By City Council Resolution No. 272839 On August 2, 1989

.detached 3.2du/ac deiached 3.2du/a*Av'.-. : :-'. rav.'&tfs 5 detached residential residential/institutiona passive recreation areas open space undesignated areas these areas may be either attached or detached single family housing LAND USE PLAN 10

12

2. A plan preserving a significant amount of natural open space and affording substantial opportunities for views. 3. A land use and circulation system providing public view outlooks to the exterior natural open space areas reserved in accordance with the Community Plan. 4. A "low-volume" curvilinear street system (dictated by the relatively low density of development), gaining primary community access via Del Mar Heights Road but providing linkages to Neighborhoods Four and Seven. 5. Neighborhood connections to a community level bikeway pedestrian system extending along Del Mar Heights Road. 6. Strong circulation linkages to the high school (to the west) in Unit Seven and the elementary school and neighborhood park (to the south) in Unit Four. LAND USE SUMMARY Table 1 summarizes land use acreage allocations for the precise plan area. Approximately 108.6 acres, or 44 percent of the acreage, is allocated to residential uses. The remaining property is specified for institutional uses, streets, and open space. A total of 373 dwelling units are proposed. Housing areas will accommodate an estimated peak population of 958 residents. Table 1 LAND USE ACREAGE ALLOCATIONS Percent Land Use Acreage of Total Detached Residential 108.6 44 Institutional* 7.5 3 Undesignated 26.1 11 Passive Recreational Areas 1.1 Major Streets and Collectors 9.8 4 Open Space 93.5 38 TOTAL 246.6 100 *Includes an existing religious institution site of 2.5 acres. 13

RESIDENTIAL LAND USE Figure 6 shows the proposed distribution of residential development in the precise plan area. The housing mix is summarized in Table 2. All acreages are subject to minor modification during detailed engineering and design; consequently, the dwelling unit calculations provided in the precise plan may be subject to some corresponding modification at the time that development plans and subdivision maps are submitted. A total of 373 dwelling units are proposed on 108.6 acres, resulting in an average density of 3.43 housing units per residential acre. The detached housing density is based on the total area included in the residential area (lots, internal slopes and streets, but excluding open space, the collector street, and the major street). On the basis of the total precise plan area (exclusive of undesignated areas), the plan produces a gross density of roughly 1.51 units per acre. A small number of additional units may result from: 1) City approval of a conversion of a portion of the institutional area to very low density housing with a maximum density of 4.25 units per acre; 2) conversion to a single-family residential lot of that area of the existing church site presently lying within a City of San Diego street reservation for Del Mar Heights Road (once the City of San Diego determines that such reservation can be relinquished); and 3) adoption of undesignated areas of the plan for residential uses which will require Precise Plan amendments. Housing Type The single-family detached category corresponds to the "very-low density" category in the North City West Community Plan. Proposed detached units are of the conventional lot, very low density, single-family type. It should be emphasized that while certain housing areas are designated for detached housing (see "asterisks" in Figure 6), future development could appropriately take the form of attached clustered housing because of topographic conditions and limitations imposed by small ownerships. As shown in Table 2, a population of 1,044 persons is estimated for Unit Four-A. 14

Housing Category Table 2 Single Family Detached Density DU/AC. 3.1-4.8 AC. 108.6 Housing Mix Persons D U. Per DU 373 2.8 Estimated Population 1,044 Housing Location The distribution of residential areas and the designation of housing categories evolved from the following considerations: o The overall land use and residential patterns established by the North City West Community Plan. o The environmental setting and its impact upon project siting and densities with respect to grading, selection of housing types, view enhancement, and the provision of drainage and utilities. o Compatible land use relationships and buffering as necessary. o Circulation around and through the neighborhood with respect to vehicular, pedestrian and bikeway access. The single-family areas to the north and east offer panoramic views of the surrounding areas. The single-family residences to the west offer more limited canyon view opportunities. Balanced Community The North City West Community Plan calls for the enforcement of a balanced community housing program consistent with Council Policy 600-19. This means that a range of housing unit types and prices should be available in the community, suitable to households at a variety of income levels. The Community Plan provides for this balance by correlating income levels to proposed housing categories and locations. The very-low density categories in the Community Plan are designated for "lower-middle income families and up." 15

major street collector local traffic signal * ( INCLUDES 500 THROUGH TRIPS FROM DEVELOPMENT UNIT 7) DAILY TRIPS. SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE BASED ON PROJECTED UNIT COUNTS FOR UNDESIGNATED AREAS 9 UNIT STREET SYSTEM

24

gonzales canyon cul-de-sac pass-through create "" ^nmmmin.nfifffmsatkikxw^ reserve natural.-j 98 0B - ^«^^-1 slnglejvv loade.df.x-o; residential. *: unit 7 i^l fill area!±j cut area ^school/ Dark maximum views thru terracing public view outlook natural open space "daylight* cuts undesignated areas 14 UNIT DESIGN APPROACH 34

Passive Recreation Areas Two areas of the land use plan are proposed as passive recreation areas. The first of these, Passive Recreation Area "A," occurs northeast of the main entrance off Del Mar Heights Road. A preliminary design is shown on Figure 17 and proposes a serpentine pathway and mounded play areas with canopy-like trees. Tree clustering is suggested to screen this passive recreation area from the adjacent residences to the north. Intended activities for this area include walking, picnicking and resting points for residents out for a bicycle ride. The other "mini-park," Passive Recreation Area "B," is located west of the eastern intersection of the loop road and Black Mountain Road. An initial conceptual design as depicted on Figure 22 proposes an informal turf area, with canopy-like trees separating it from the adjacent streets, and low shrubs acting as a transition to the natural open space. Additionally, benches are to be provided along with a pedestrian sidewalk around the area. Neither of the passive recreation areas are intended to function as or take the place of a neighborhood park. A neighborhood park is located across Del Mar Heights Road in Development Unit 4. Maintenance of the passive recreation areas is to be accomplished through a neighborhood homeowners association. DETACHED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS The precise plan for Unit Four-A provides a total of 373 detached, single-family dwelling units. While a minimum pad area of 6,000 square feet is contemplated for most detached lots, the average size of those lots shown in the plan will more nearly approximate 7,500 square feet. As indicated in Chapter 2, areas designated for detached units could optionally be developed as clustered housing. All single-family projects will be developed in conformance with the SF1 Zone or the SF1-A Zone as described in Chapter 5 and incorporated into the Planned District Ordinance. The following guidelines should be considered in the design, review, and approval of subdivision maps and development plans. Design Guidelines o Each project area should be given an identity through common design treatments, delineation of project boundaries, and distinctive entrances. 56

SF1! precise plan boundary planned district zoning SF1- A H - -,i - - - - A-1-10 existing zone zone boundary 23 ZONING PLAN 62