DISTRICT OF LAKE COUNTRY

Similar documents
DISTRICT OF LAKE COUNTRY

Agenda Board of Variance Committee Meeting

Development Variance Permit DVP00055 for 3590 Inverness Street

NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT 1032 NARAMATA ROAD

REM R.P ER E

U S 486 RAID ST E E E 300 E 30 RE AVE RE A PADMO PAD RAID T

2. Rezone a portion of the lot from R2 (Small Lot Residential) to RD2 (Duplex: Housing Lane).

(a) provision of a $3,000 Community Amenity Contribution to be used by Parks, Recreation and Culture for recreation facility improvements; and

Public Notice. Subject Property. May 10, Subject Property: 920 Kilwinning Street

CULTUS LAKE PARK BOARD AGENDA

STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL

Public Notice. Subject Property. January 24, Subject Property: 3919 Lakeside Rd

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION (# PARIS STREET)

Application: DVP Owner: Pillar West Developments Inc. Address: 4646 McClure Rd Applicant: Integrity Services Inc.

District of Nomtfo SaaMcli STAFF REPORT

REGIONAL DISTRICT OF CENTRAL OKANAGAN PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA

Development Variance Permit Authorization ( DV) Harper Road, and Strawiine Hiii Street

CITY OF ARMSTRONG. AGENDA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Councillors R. Nitchie (Chair), P. Britton, J. Trainor

COMOX ST Lot 7 R.P. R.P. Lot 6. Lot 5. Lot 3. Lot 4 CRESTON AVE

Application: Z Owner: D & S Schulz Enterprises Ltd. Address: 196 Cariboo Rd Applicant: Siegfried Schulz. RU6 - Two Dwelling Housing

RM2 Low Density Row Housing RM3 Low Density Multiple Housing

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEERING, AND SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

HOLDING/ DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY

CITY OF VICTORIA BOARD OF VARIANCE MINUTES NOVEMBER 12, 2015

Director, Community Planning, South District

REGULAR MEETING OF THE LAND USE AND PLANNING COMMITTEE

NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT (362 MACDONALD STREET)

Public Notice. Subject Property. January 24, Subject Property: 3917 Lakeside Rd

PLANNING PROCEDURES AND FEES BYLAW

Lot 1 KAP Lot 1. Lot 1. Lot 4. ot 5

Address: 1350 & 1370 KLO Road Applicant: Kent-Macpherson

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

DECISION AND ORDER APPEARANCES. Decision Issue Date Thursday, March 22, 2018

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT CASE

Development Permit Application

MOOSEJAW MOOSEJAW MOOSEJAW. t 1. Lot 17. Lot 18. Lot 19. Lot 19

MIAMI SHORES VILLAGE

Address: 2025 Agassiz Road Applicant: Cristian Anca. RM5 Medium Density Multiple Housing

Development Variance Permit

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

COUNCIL AGENDA DISTRICT OF WEST VANCOUVER TH STREET, WEST VANCOUVER BC V7V 3T3 COUNCIL REPORT

8.14 Single Detached with Granny Flat or Coach House Edgemere

That the Committee of Adjustment Minutes dated July 13, 2016, be received.

ot 1 KAP KAP KAP 61271

FURTHER THAT Minor Variance A-11/17 not be subject to any conditions.

Public Hearing to be held at City of Penticton Council Chambers 171 Main Street, Penticton, B.C. Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 6:00 p.m.

Application Form Development Proposal

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Municipality of North Cowichan Community Planning Advisory Committee Agenda

Part 9 Specific Land Uses - Dual Occupancy

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Committee of Adjustment Agenda. Meeting Date: Monday October 17, 2016 Woodstock City Hall, Council Chambers Regular Session: 7:00 PM

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

CITY OF VANCOUVER POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI

District of Summerland Advisory Planning Commission Meeting Agenda

RT-3 District Schedule

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

Scarborough Community Council Item SC18.28, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on December 13, 14 and 15, 2016 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW -2017

A Guide to the Municipal Planning Process in Saskatchewan

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

City of Surrey ADDITIONAL PLANNING COMMENTS File:

ARTICLE ZONING DISTRICTS AND OFFICIAL MAP SEC SUPPLEMENTAL AREA, YARD AND HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS.

Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 4846,2018 ( RZ) for a Proposed Two Lot Subdivision at 1138 Dansey Avenue. CitiWest Consulting Ltd.

Board of Variance Minutes

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT

PUBLIC HEARING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2018 AT 7:00 PM MATSQUI CENTENNIAL AUDITORIUM AGENDA

LIN AVE The applicant is proposing to construct a four-unit Lot A R.P

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

Application: Z Owner: Delauralyn Pihl

APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE APPLICANT:

APC REPORT. Peter Bernacki, Richard Mickle, and Melinda Bell

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORWICH COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, :00 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, OTTERVILLE AGENDA

Staff Report. October 19, 2016 Page 1 of 17. Meeting Date: October 19, 2016

ORDINANCE NO to amend subsection A to add subsection (15) which shall read as follows: (15) Attached dwelling units such as townhouses.

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

General Manager, Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

General Manager of Planning and Development Services in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

PUBLIC HEARINGS. (St. Boniface Ward) File DAV /2013D [c/r DAZ 208/2013]

Borough of Haddonfield New Jersey

APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR PERMISSION UNDER SECTION 45 OF THE PLANNING ACT

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: Development Permit

Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 7 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS

BALSAM AVE Lot A. Lot A. Lot 12 Lot A. Lot 11 R.P R.P R.P. R.P Lot B. Lot B. Lot A Lot B Lot 11. Lot A R.P.

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

A By-law to amend Zoning and Development By-law No regarding Laneway Houses

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

Transcription:

DISTRICT OF LAKE COUNTRY REPORT TO COUNCIL MEETING TYPE AND DATE: REGULAR MEETING JUNE 4, 2013 FROM: CARIE LIEFKE, PLANNER, PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE AT 10981 OKANAGAN CENTRE ROAD WEST FILE #: DVP2013-002 ISSUE(S)/PURPOSE: To inform Council of a side yard setback infraction that has mistakenly occurred and to request a relaxation to the setback requirements through a variance permit. RECOMMENDATION(S): THAT Development Variance Permit DVP2013-002 be approved [attached as Attachment D to the Report from Planning and Development dated June 4, 2013], thereby varying Zoning Bylaw 561, 2007 as follows: Section 7.4.2 FROM: unenclosed steps, eaves, awnings, decks, canopies, balconies, or porches may project into a required yard provided such projections do not exceed 0.6m. TO: unenclosed steps, awnings, decks, canopies, balconies, or porches may project into a required yard provided such projections do not exceed 0.6m and eaves may project into the required side yards provided such projections do not exceed 0.92m as shown on Schedule A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A Builder and Plan Check oversight occurred during the initial construction stages of this development. The roof overhangs (eaves) extend 0.92m into the required 2.0m side yard setbacks. As per Section 7.4.2 of Zoning Bylaw 561, 2007, the roof overhang should only extend 0.6m into the setback. The applicant has requested that a variance be granted to allow the house to remain as constructed. While it is possible to reduce the roof overhang to 0.6m, the owner would incur additional expenses to have this oversight corrected; the design and character of the house would also be negatively affected. Staff recommend that this variance request be granted as there are no substantial impacts to the community.

2 Application Type Development Variance Permit File Number: DVP2013-002 Folio: 02629.002 Proponent: Cloud 9 Design Build Inc. Dietmar Depenau Owner(s): PETER PALMA PROFESSION Legal Description: Parcel C (KR41452) Block K Sec 17 Twp 20 ODYD Plan 454 PID 025-030-078 Civic Address: 10981 OKANAGAN CENTRE RD WEST OCP Designation: Urban Residential Zoning Designation: RU1 Single Family Housing ALR: N/A Parcel Size: 485.6 m 2 (0.12 Acres) DP Area(s): Erosion; GHG/Resource Conservation ; Natural Environment; Site Summary: Zoning: Use: North: RU1 Single Family Housing Residential East: RR3 Rural Residential 3 Vacant South: RU1 Single Family Housing Residential West: W1 Recreational Water Use Okanagan Centre Road; Okanagan Lake

3 BACKGROUND/HISTORY: The applicant is requesting a side yard setback variance for the roof overhang. Construction of the roof overhang into the side yard setback was an oversight. The oversight was regrettably not caught at the Plan Checking Stage or at the framing inspection by the builder or District staff. Unfortunately, construction is now past the stage of being able to trim the overhang back without substantial cost. The requested variance is to vary Zoning Bylaw 561 Section 7.4.2: FROM: unenclosed steps, eaves, awnings, decks, canopies, balconies, or porches may project into a required yard provided such projections do not exceed 0.6m. TO: unenclosed steps, awnings, decks, canopies, balconies, or porches may project into a required yard provided such projections do not exceed 0.6m and eaves may project into the required side yards provided such projections do not exceed 0.92m as shown on Schedule A of the permit. This variance would allow the roof overhang to be 1.08m from the property line (rather than 1.4m). DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS: Site Description: The property is 485.6m2 and slopes slightly to the west towards Okanagan Lake. The property has road frontage on two streets (Maddock Ave and Okanagan Centre Rd West). The site was previously undeveloped; a house is now being constructed on the property. Current Development Potential: As the property is zoned RU1 Single Family Housing, the current development (house construction) will fulfill the development potential of the site. APPLICABLE POLICIES AND LEGISLATION: Local Government Act Section 922 allows a Development Variance Permit to be issued that would vary the provisions of a bylaw under Part 26 Division 7 [Zoning and Other Development Regulations] provided that use or density of land is not varied, a flood plain specification is not varied, or a phased development agreement is not varied.

Official Community Plan: Goals Maintain Okanagan Centre as a residential community with natural and visual amenities. Objectives Maintain and improve the residential quality of the neighbourhood. Zoning Bylaw: The property is zoned RU1 Single Family Housing (Section 15.1). For the development of the house being constructed on this property, the bylaw requires a 2.0m side yard setback. The side yard setback is measured from the side lot line to the nearest wall or supporting member of a building or structure. Section 7.4.2 states that: unenclosed steps, eaves, awnings, decks, canopies, balconies, or porches may project into a required yard provided such projections do not exceed 0.6m. Section 7.4.2 would need to be varied to allow the building to remain as currently constructed (i.e. with the eaves projecting into the side yard 0.92m rather than 0.6m). INTERDEPARTMENTAL IMPLICATIONS: Building Division: The Building Department does not have objections to the development remaining with the minor variance. The variance is that the roof extends 914mm (3 feet) instead of the allowed 600mm (1.97 feet) into the side yard setback. The infraction is at the roof level only and not at the foundation line. This will not affect the requirements of the BC Building Code for fire separation of the building. This minor infraction was caught after construction had started as the requirement was not caught at the Plan Checking Stage. Removing this section of the roof is possible but could prove a hardship to complete successfully and would affect the building designed heritage look. Fire/Emergency Services Department: The Fire Department does not have any concerns with this application. COMMUNITY IMPLICATIONS: It is not anticipated that this application will affect the community at large. As the building (foundation, walls, etc) is setback 2.03m from the side property lines (bylaw requirement is 2.0m) it is likely that the impact to the neighbours will be minimal. However, the neighbours may have a slight impact as the roof overhang is closer to the property line (roof overhang is 0.33m [1.08 feet] closer to the property line than what is permitted by the bylaw). ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS: It is not anticipated that there will be any environmental impacts as a result of this application. ADHERENCE TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES: This application does not affect the District Strategic Priorities. COST, BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS AND FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: It is not anticipated that this application will affect District financial considerations. IMPACT ON STAFF CAPACITY AND WORKLOAD: If approved, this application will not affect District staff capacity or workload. If this variance request is denied, staff workload may be affected while trying to have the applicant comply with the bylaw requirements. OPTIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS/ALTERNATIVES: THAT DVP2013-002 which proposes to vary Section 7.4.2 of Zoning Bylaw 561 NOT be approved. 4

5 SUMMARY/CONCLUSION: The eaves of the house were built according to the construction drawings, but not in accordance with the Zoning Bylaw; this bylaw infraction was unfortunately not caught at the Plan Check stage. The applicant has requested a variance to the bylaw to allow the roof overhangs to remain as constructed. While possible to reduce the roof overhangs (by approximately 1 foot/0.32m), the character of the house would be negatively altered and the owner would incur an additional expense. Staff have reviewed the matter; it is believed that the neighbours and community will not be substantially affected. It is recommended that the application be approved. Respectfully Submitted, Carie Liefke Planner Planning and Development This report has been prepared in consultation with the following listed departments: CONCURRENCES Department CAO Director of Planning and Development ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A Current Site Plan Attachment B Surveyors Site Improvement Survey Attachment C Zoning Analysis Attachment D DVP2013-002 Permit Name Alberto De Feo Mark Koch

6 Attachment A Current Site Plan

Attachment B Surveyors Site Improvement Survey 7 This Survey shows the foundation. It does not shown the roof overhangs. The foundation is 2.03m from the side property lines; the roof overhang is 1.1m from the side property lines. The roof overhang projects into the side yard 0.9m; the bylaw permits a 0.6m projection.

8 Criteria: Zoning: Proposal: Minimum Lot Area (m 2 ) 500 485.6 Lot Width (m) 15 15.24 Lot Depth (m) 30 30.48 Front Yard Setback (m) 4.5, but 6.0 to garage entru 6.04 Rear Yard Setback (m) 6.0 6.72 Side Yard Setback 2.0 2.03 Projection into Side Yard (m) 0.6 0.92 Attachment C Zoning Analysis

Attachment D Development Variance Permit District of Lake Country 10150 Bottom Wood Lake Road Lake Country, BC V4V 2M1 t: 250-766-6674 f: 250-766-0200 lakecountry.bc.ca APPROVED ISSUANCE OF DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT (pursuant to Sec. 920 of the Local Government Act) PERMIT # DVP2013-002 FOLIO # # 02629.002 ZONING DESIGNATION: ISSUED TO: SITE ADDRESS: RU1 Single Family Housing Peter Palma Professional Corporation 10981 Okanagan Centre Road West LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel C (KR41452) Block K Section 17 Township 20 Osoyoos Division Yale District Plan 454 PARCEL IDENTIFIER: 025-030-078 SCOPE OF APPROVAL This Permit applies to and only to those lands within the Municipality as described above, and any and all buildings, structures and other development thereon. This Permit is issued subject to compliance with all of the Bylaws of the Municipality applicable thereto, except as specifically varied or supplemented by this Permit, noted in the Terms and Conditions below. Applicants for Development and Development Variance Permits should be aware that the issuance of a Permit limits the applicant to be in strict compliance with regulations of the Zoning bylaw or Subdivision Control Bylaw unless specific Variances have been authorized by the Permit. No implied Variances from bylaw provisions shall be granted by virtue of drawing notations which are inconsistent with bylaw provisions and which have not been identified as required Variances by the applicant or Municipal staff. If any term or condition of this permit is for any reason held to be invalid by a decision or a Court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this permit. 1. TERMS AND CONDITIONS Development Variance Permit DVP2013-002-on Parcel C (KR41452) Block K Section 17 Township 20 Osoyoos Division Yale District Plan 454 is approved subject to the following conditions: a) That Zoning Bylaw 561 Section 7.4.2 is varied FROM: unenclosed steps, eaves, awnings, decks, canopies, balconies, or porches may project into a required yard provided such projections do not exceed 0.6m. TO: unenclosed steps, awnings, decks, canopies, balconies, or porches may project into a required yard provided such projections do not exceed 0.6m and eaves may project into the required side yards provided such projections do not exceed 0.92m as shown on Schedule A. 2. DEVELOPMENT The land described herein shall be developed strictly in accordance with the terms, conditions and provisions of this Permit and any plans and specifications attached to shall form a part hereof. S:\Council meetings\2013 - Council\June 4\DVP2013-002 Permit.docx

DVP2013-002 2 The development shall commence in conjunction with the approved Building Permit within TWO YEARS of the date that this permit is issued. If the permittee does not commence the development permitted by this Permit within TWO years of the date of issuance of this permit, this permit shall lapse. The terms of the permit or any amendment to it are binding on all persons who acquire an interest in the land affected by the permit. THIS IS NOT A BUILDING PERMIT 3. APPROVALS Authorizing resolutions passed by the Council on the day of,. Issued by the Corporate Officer of the District of Lake Country this day of,. Corporate Officer, Reyna Seabrook S:\Council meetings\2013 - Council\June 4\DVP2013-002 Permit.docx

DVP2013-002 3 Schedule A S:\Council meetings\2013 - Council\June 4\DVP2013-002 Permit.docx