SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: February 1, 2007

Similar documents
ZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: August 8, 2013

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: February 17, 2010

APPLICANT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION. CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT Council District 4 PRESENT ZONING PROPOSED ZONING

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, SIDEWALK WAIVER, & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 6, 2008

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 15, 2007

ZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: September 15, 2011

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: September 15, 2016

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 6, 2004

McGowin Park, LLC. B-3, Community Business District

ZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 5, 2009

ZONING AMENDMENT, & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 17, 2007

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT August 18, 2016

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 3, 2016

BETTA STOR-IT SUBDIVISION

HERON LANDING SUBDIVISION

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 20, 2017

ZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: June 7, 2007

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016

SUBDIVISION & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: December 1, 2016

SUBDIVISION, PLANNING APPROVAL, & REZONING STAFF REPORT Date: June 4, 2015

KLUGE PLACE SUBDIVISION

DAWES SWITCHING STATION SUBDIVISION

KRONER S MOBILE WEST COMMERCIAL BUSINESS PARK SUBDIVISION

ZONING AMENDMENT, & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 24, 2008

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 3, 2014

PENNY LAKES SUBDIVISION

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 7, 2013

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 9, 2015

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: July 19, 2018

MCGOWIN PARK EAST OF SATCHEL PAIGE SUBDIVISION, RESUBDIVISION OF

ZONING AMENDMENT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 7, 2012

MOBILE TOWERS SUBDIVISION

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: October 19, 2017

TERRY POIROUX FAMILY DIVISION SUBDIVISION

AUTUMNDALE SUBDIVISION, RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

ZONING AMENDMENT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: July 5, 2012

ZONING AMENDMENT, SUBDIVISION & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 16, 2006

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & ZONING AMENDMENT STAFF REPORT Date: December 21, 2017

AMELIA LAKE SUBDIVISON, PHASES 1-2

DAWES OAK SUBDIVISION

PORT CITY COMMERCE PARK SUBDIVISION

BAY FOREST PARK SUBDIVISION, RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 6 & 7 AND BAY FOREST PARK SUBDIVISION LOT 10, OF THE RESUBDIVISON OF LOTS 9 & 10

SOUTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION, LOT A, RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 7 & 8

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014

DEER RIVER COMMERCIAL PARK SUBDIVISION

NOBLE DRIVE EAST SUBDIVISION

DINKINS ESTATE FAMILY SUBDIVISION

ALBA BEACH SUBDIVISION, RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 17

SILVER PINES SUBDIVISION

PALMER WOODS SUBDIVISION, PHASE III

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 1, 2018

MTC ALABAMA SUBDIVISION

PARK PLACE SUBDIVISION

PROVISION POINTE SUBDIVISION

THE BLUFFS AT CYPRESS CREEK SUBDIVISION, PHASE ONE

COCHRAN FAMILY RIVERSIDE ESTATE SUBDIVISION

OAK HILL SUBDIVISION

WESTMINSTER PARK SUBDIVISION

AMENDMENT TO REGULATING PLAN & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: December 15, 2016

THE WHEELER BUILDING SUBDIVISION

MAGNOLIA SPRINGS SUBDIVISION, PHASE ONE

DAUPHIN CREEK ESTATES SUBDIVISION

# 6 Case #SUB LEGACY SUBDIVISION. Engineering Comments: Must comply with the Mobile County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance.

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: June 18, 2015

MOBILE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION LETTER OF DECISION. August 19, 2011

STONE HEDGE SUBDIVISION, UNIT 1, RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 40 & WEST COMMON AREA

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: August 20, 2015

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, & REZONING STAFF REPORT Date: March 23, 2017

TURTLE CREEK SUBDIVISION, PHASE THREE

ELIZA JORDAN CORNER SUBDIVISION

JOHNNY S RV PARK SUBDIVISION

HAWTHORNE PLACE SUBDIVISON, RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 15 REVISED

THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA

BROADWAY THREE NOTCH ROAD SUBDIVISION

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, & REZONING STAFF REPORT Date: September 17, 2015

# 14 SUB CANAL SUBDIVISION

THE BLUFFS AT CYPRESS CREEK SUBDIVISION

# 1 HOLDOVER Revised SUB CANAL SUBDIVISION

WESTMINSTER PARK PLACE SUBDIVISION

ARTICLE 24 SITE PLAN REVIEW

TULSA PARK ESTATES SUBDIVISION, RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 6

Chapter Plat Design (LMC)

THE CI FY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA

MOBILE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION LETTER OF DECISION. June 3, 2011

Waseca County Planning and Zoning Office

M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE

THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA

SECTION 874 SITE PLAN REVIEW

Appendix J - Planned Unit Development (PUD)

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT

THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA MOBILE Crry PLANNING COMMISSION

THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA

Planned Unit Development (PUD). Sections:

Chapter 22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.

APPLICATION PROCEDURE

CHAPTER XVIII SITE PLAN REVIEW

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 208 Article 21: Residential Unit Developments Amendments: ARTICLE XXI

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA

Transcription:

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: February 1, 2007 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Pala Verde Mobile Home Park Subdivision Pala Verde Mobile Home Park Subdivision LOCATION 3525 Demetropolis Road (East side of Demetropolis Road, 325 + South of Government Boulevard) CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT District 4 PRESENT ZONING AREA OF PROPERTY R-3, Multi-Family Residential 2-Lot/10.7+ Acres CONTEMPLATED USE Planned Unit Development Approval to allow a 52-unit mobile home park and playground on a single building site and Planning Approval to allow a mobile home park in an R-3, Multi-Family Residential District. TIME SCHEDULE FOR DEVELOPMENT Immediately ENGINEERING COMMENTS Show drainage easement. The flood zone shown should be depicted from FEMA maps NOT plotted from elevations. Show minimum finished floor elevation on lots. The applicant is responsible for verifying if the site contains wetlands. The site can be checked against the National Wetlands Inventory on the COM web site Environmental Viewer. If the site is included on the NWI, it is the applicant s responsibility to confirm or deny the existence of regulatory wetlands. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING COMMENTS Driveway number, size, location, and design to be approved by Traffic Engineering and conform to AASHTO standards. Driveway width is narrower than the standard for two-way traffic flow. The driveway width should be widened to twenty-four feet or the drive should be signed and marked for one-way travel. URBAN FORESTRY COMMENTS Property to be developed in compliance with state and local laws that pertain to tree preservation and protection on both city and private properties (State Act 61-929 and City Code Chapters 57 and 64).

Preservation status is to be given to the 55 Live Oak Tree located on PAD 49. Any work on or under this tree is to be permitted and coordinated with Urban Forestry; removal to be permitted only in the case of disease or impending danger. REMARKS The applicant is requesting Subdivision approval to create two legal lots from a metes and bounds parcel, Planned Unit Development approval to allow a 52-unit mobile home park and playground on a single building site, and Planning Approval to allow a mobile home park in an R-3, Multi-Family Residential District. Subdivision review examines the site with regard to promoting orderly development, protecting general health, safety and welfare, and ensuring that development is correlated with adjacent developments and public utilities and services, and to ensure that the subdivision meets the minimum standards set forth in the Subdivision Regulations for lot size, road frontage, lot configuration, etc. Regarding the proposed subdivision, the plat illustrates the proposed 10.7± acre, two-lot subdivision located on the East side of Demetropolis Road, 325 + South of Government Boulevard, which is located within Council District 4. Demetropolis Road has an 80-foot rightof-way. This portion of Demetropolis Road is not illustrated on the Major Street Plan; however, the University Boulevard (Interstate 10-U. S. Highway 45 Connection) bisects this development which requires a 100-foot right-of-way. However, due to the existing development, creation of this connection in the near future is improbable. In some situations, setbacks are typically recommended instead of dedication; thus while development in this corridor is existing, and the corridor is conceptual at this time no setback or dedication should be required. Additionally, as illustrated Lot 30 of Brooks Manor Subdivision is included in the proposed Lot 1 of the preliminary plat. However, it should be removed as this legal lot of record is zoned R-1, Single-Family Residential, fronts a residential minor street, and is not part of the development. As a means of access management, a note should be placed on the final plat limiting Lot 1 to the existing curb cuts to Demetropolis Road and limiting Lot 2 to one curb cut to Demetropolis Road, with the location, size and design to be approved by the Traffic Engineering Department. Additionally, as the site adjoins residentially zoned property, buffering in accordance with Section 64-4.D.1.a of the Zoning Ordinance should be required to screen the R-3, Multi-Family district use. Planned Unit Development review examines the site with regard to its location to ensure that it is generally compatible with neighboring uses; that adequate access is provided without generating excess traffic along minor residential streets in residential districts outside the PUD; and that natural features of the site are taken into consideration. PUD review also examines the design of the development to provide for adequate circulation within the development; to ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles; and to consider and provide for protection from adverse effects of adjacent properties as well as provide protection of adjacent properties from adverse effects from the PUD. - 2 -

The applicant is requesting PUD approval to allow a 52-unit mobile home park and playground on a single building site. The property is already developed with 52-unit mobile home sites on the site, and the addition of the playground is proposed. Since the site is providing 52 spaces for mobile homes 52 spaces would be required for the site. However, if the site provides an on-site rental office, one space per 300 square feet for the rental office would be required. Therefore, prior to the signing of the Final Plat a revised PUD plan should be submitted illustrating the required parking spaces for the rental office. Regarding circulation on the site, most aspects would meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. However, the site has an approximate 17-foot circular access on-site, which could not accommodate two-way traffic. As Traffic Engineering states if this is a desirable alternative for access, the driveway and circulation aisle must be signed and marked to restrict it to one-way traffic. The review required for Planning Approval examines the applicant's location and site plan with regard to transportation, parking and access, public utilities and facilities, traffic congestion and hazard, and to determine if the proposal is in harmony with the orderly and appropriate development of the district. While the nature of the development appears harmonious with the surrounding development, since the development has existed as a mobile home park for many years and no expansion of mobile home lots are anticipated. There is undeveloped B-2 zoned land to the North of the development facing Government Boulevard, and B-3 and I-1 zoned property to the West, the development of which would have more of an impact on residences, than the existing mobile home park property. Moreover, excluding Lot 30 of Brooks Manor Subdivision the proposed Lot 1 of the preliminary plat as this legal lot of record is zoned R-1, Single-Family Residential, fronts a residential minor street, and is not part of the development. Also, the plan does not illustrate landscaping and tree plantings, it has been the practice of this Commission to require landscaping and tree planting for such areas on other similar projects. RECOMMENDATION Subdivision Based on the preceding, the plat is recommended for Tentative Approval, subject to the following conditions: 1) placement of a note on the final plat limiting Lot 1 to the existing curb cuts to Demetropolis Road and limiting Lot 2 to one curb cut to Demetropolis Road, with the location, size and design to be approved by the Traffic Engineering Department and conform to AASHTO standards; 2) the exclusion of Lot 30 of Brooks Manor Subdivision from the preliminary plat; and 3) full compliance with all other municipal codes and ordinances. Planned Unit Development Based on the preceding, the PUD is recommended for Approval, subject to the following conditions: 1) completion of the subdivision process; 2) provision of the required buffer fence where the site abuts residentially zoned properties; 3) any significant changes to the site development will necessitate a new PUD approval by the Planning Commission; 4) Full compliance with landscaping and tree requirements for Lot 1; 5) submission of a revised PUD plan illustrating the required parking for - 3 -

the on-site rental office and the exclusion of Lot 30 of Brooks Manor Subdivision; and 6) full compliance with all municipal codes and ordinances. Planning Approval Based on the preceding, the Planning Approval is recommended for Approval, subject to the following conditions: 1) completion of the subdivision process; 2) provision of the required buffer fence where the site abuts residentially zoned properties; 3) any significant changes to the site development will necessitate a new Planning Approval by the Planning Commission; 4) Full compliance with landscaping and tree requirements for Lot 1; 5) submission of a revised site plan illustrating the required parking for the on-site rental office and the exclusion of Lot 30 of Brooks Manor Subdivision; and 6) full compliance with all municipal codes and ordinances. - 4 -

- 5 -

- 6 -

- 7 -