STAFF REPORT. Applicable Statutes/Ordinances: Corinna Township Subdivision Ordinance

Similar documents
STAFF REPORT. Arthur and Kathleen Quiggle 4(b)

STAFF REPORT. Permit History:

STAFF REPORT. Gary and Kathleen Miron. Background Information:

Legal Description Part of the Western Half of the Eastern Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, Le Ray Township

Please complete each entry and check off each item. An incomplete application will be returned.

CORINNA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT / PLANNING COMMISSION

{{t:t;r:n;o:"signer 2";l:"Date";}}

What is a Conditional Use? When is a Conditional Use Necessary? Who decides if I will get a Conditional Use Permit

STAFF REPORT. Agenda Item: 4(d)

Special Use Permit - Planned Unit Development Checklist. Property Address:

MTC ALABAMA SUBDIVISION

** If your lot does not meet the requirements above, please read Sec below

Instructions to the Applicant

PLANNING BOARD CITY OF CONCORD, NH MINOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST

Understanding the Conditional Use Process

WASECA PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, :00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 508 SOUTH STATE STREET

SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe

Waseca County Planning and Zoning Office

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

4. facilitate the construction of streets, utilities and public services in a more economical and efficient manner;

ARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT

INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE RETURNED! GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION. Applicant s name Day Phone address Authorized Agent (if applicable)

CHAPTER 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT

Attached is a Clinton Township Zoning Permit Application and requirements for issuance of a permit.

A. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan.

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 9, 2015

APPLICATION PROCEDURE

CHAPTER 10 Planned Unit Development Zoning Districts

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS

ORDINANCE NO. _4.06 AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH BUILDING SITE REGULATIONS SECTION A PURPOSE AND INTENT

PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECK LIST

SECTION 10 STANDARD PLATS

LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW

INFORMATION & PROCEDURES FOR CHANGE OF ZONING REQUESTS AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS

SECTION 4: PRELIMINARY PLAT

CHAPTER XVIII SITE PLAN REVIEW

SUBDIVISION APPLICATION CHECKLIST SKETCH PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT FINAL PLAT

VARIANCE PROCEDURE The City Council will consider the request and either grant or deny the variance.

CHARLES CITY COUNTY SITE PLAN ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall be known as the Charles City County Site Plan Ordinance.

APPLICATION PROCESSING STEPS STEP 1 CHECK WITH STAFF

Present Harmoning Oleson Naaktgeboren: T

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: July 19, 2018

FEE The staff will let you know the current cost of filing an application. Make checks payable to the San Joaquin County Treasurer.

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

COLUMBIA COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COURTHOUSE 230 STRAND ST. HELENS, OREGON (503) APPLICANT: Name:

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

Interim Use Permit Application

CHAPTER 6 CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS AND STREAM PROTECTION AREAS

ARTICLE 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT

FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016

PICKENS COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ORDINANCE. Organization of the Ordinance

Residential Project Convenience Facilities

Residential Major Subdivision Review Checklist

THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF DOUGLAS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

I. Requirements for All Applications. C D W

ARTICLE 9 SPECIFICATIONS FOR DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE DERBY ZONING REGULATIONS AUGUST 12, 2008

Please complete each entry and check off each item. An incomplete application will be returned.

4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR 97321

PENINSULA TOWNSHIP LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE TOWNSHIP OF PENINSULA COUNTY OF GRAND TRAVERSE, STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO OF 2012

WASCO COUNTY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

Initial Subdivision Applications Shall Include the Following:

Land Use. Existing Land Use

Open Space Model Ordinance

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 3, 2016

APPLICATION PROCESSING. CHECK WITH STAFF - Development Services Staff will explain the requirements and procedures to you.

A.3. ARTICLE 7 PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION AND/OR LAND DEVELOPMENT

BOA David Hollerich Centerline Setback Variance 09/05/2012

SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE. LaPorte County City of LaPorte City of Michigan City

Residential Minor Subdivision Review Checklist

Lake of the Woods County Land Use Permit Instruction Sheet

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 1, 2018

Extractive Industrial Regulatory Ordinance No. 21 revised Dec. 28, 2010 EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIAL REGULATORY ORDINANCE TYRONE TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN

PUBLIC NUISANCES & DETRIMENTAL NONCONFORMITIES

Conservation Design Subdivisions

Certified Survey Map (CSM) Submittal Updated: 6/29/18

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

SUBDIVISION & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: December 1, 2016

Anyone speaking to the Planning Commission shall state their name and address for the record. Thank you.

CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN CHECKLIST Major Land Development Project

ARTICLE 7. SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS

Chapter 22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.

Ravenna Township. Dakota County, Minnesota. Variance Application. Please Print or Type All Information

Diamond Falls Subdivision PROPOSED YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

Major Subdivision Application Packet. Revised June 2018

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

APPLICATION REVIEW CHECKLISTS

TULSA PARK ESTATES SUBDIVISION, RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 6

SITE PLAN REVIEW ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW. Please Note: Once submitted to the County, all application materials become a matter of public record.

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia

FINAL DRAFT 10/23/06 ARTICLE VI

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT

ARTICLE 13 CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS

TOWNSHIP OF EGG HARBOR ZONING BOARD ADJUSTMENT CHECK LIST

Transcription:

STAFF REPORT Application: Preliminary plat application to subdivide an approximate 6.47 acre parcel into two lots (2.81 and 3.42 acres) with a 0.24 acre remainder to be attached to an existing nonconforming lakeshore lot. Applicant: David Snyder and Thomas Tart Agenda Item: 4(d) Background Information: Proposal: Subdivide approximately 6.47 acres into two residential lots (2.81 and 3.42 acres) and a remainder 0.24 acre parcel that would be attached to an existing nonconforming lakeshore lot of record. Location: o Property address: Parcel east of 11069 and 11083 Hollister Ave NW, Annandale o Sec/Twp/Range: 02-121-027 o Parcel number(s): 206000024400 Zoning: Suburban Residential (R2) /Residential Recreation Shorelands (S-2) Overlay District, Sugar Lake (General Development lake) Lot size: Approximately 6.47 acres to be subdivided into two residential lots (2.81 and 3.42 acres) and a remainder 0.24 acre parcel that would be attached to an existing nonconforming lakeshore lot of record. Septic System Status: Each proposed lot would be required to install a new septic system. The applicant has not submitted soil borings and preliminary location information. Natural Features: Floodplain: The property is not within an identified floodplain. Bluff/Steep Slopes: There are not any steep slopes of bluffs on the property to be subdivided. The land slopes fairly gently toward the NW corner of the property, where water appears to collect after heavy rains but eventually soaks into the ground. Wetlands: There do not appear to be any wetlands on the property, although the NW corner is low and does collect water during periods of heavy rain. Applicable Statutes/Ordinances: Corinna Township Subdivision Ordinance 1.2 Purposes. These regulations are adopted for the following purposes: 1. To guide the future growth and development of Corinna Township in recognition of the general policies embodied in the Corinna Township Corinna Township 4(d) - 1 October 14, 2014

Comprehensive Plan and protect and provide for the public health, safety, and general welfare of the Township. 2. To ensure that land to be subdivided shall be of such character that it can be used safely for building purposes without danger to health or peril from fire, flood, or other menace. Land shall not be subdivided until adequate public services and facilities exist with sufficient capacity to serve the proposed subdivision. 3. To protect and conserve the value of land throughout the Township and the value of buildings and improvements upon the land, and to minimize the conflicts among the uses of land and buildings. 4. To establish reasonable standards of design and procedures for subdivisions and resubdivisions in order to further the orderly layout and use of land, including the proper location and width of streets and building lines, and to ensure proper legal descriptions and monumenting of subdivided land. 5. To ensure that proper provision has been made for drainage, water, sewage, and public improvements such as parks, recreational facilities, transportation facilities, and improvements. The community will be required to bear no more than its fair share of the cost of providing facilities and services through requiring the developer to pay fees, furnish land, or establish mitigation measures to ensure that the development provides its fair share of capital facilities needs generated by the development. 6. To prevent the pollution of air and water resources including ground water and to encourage the wise use and management of natural resources throughout the Township in order to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the community and the value of the land. 7. To provide for open spaces through the most efficient design and layout of the land. 8. To remedy problems associated with inappropriately subdivided lands. 4.2 Standard Plat A. Preliminary Plat Approval Process for Plats Consisting of Two or More Lots iii. The Platting Committee and Planning Commission shall consider, but not be limited to, the following criteria when considering a preliminary plat: 1. The preliminary plat shall conform to all applicable official controls and all state and federal laws. 2. The preliminary plat shall be consistent with the Corinna Township Comprehensive Plan. 3. No plat shall be approved which does not conform to any applicable floodplain regulations. 4. No plat shall be approved unless there is provision for two (2) standard on-site sewage treatment systems for each lot, unless served with public sewer or an approved cluster sewer system serving lots within the subdivision. Corinna Township 4(d) - 2 October 14, 2014

5. A plat shall not be approved where a variance will subsequently be required in order to use the lots for their intended use. 6. No plat shall be approved that does not contain adequate provisions for storm water runoff. If required, no plat shall be approved without an NPDES Phase II-compliant storm water management plan reviewed and approved by the Township or its designated representative. 7. Each lot shall have sufficient buildable lot area which, for the purposes of this Ordinance, shall be defined as the contiguous area of a lot which is sufficient in area to accommodate the construction of water supply systems, sewage treatment systems, buildings and driveways, while still providing for adequate setbacks. Areas which are floodways, wetlands, rights-of-way, bluffs or which have soils that are unsuitable for individual sewage treatment systems cannot be included in calculating the buildable area of a lot. 8. Each lot shall be of sufficient size and character to meet applicable sewage treatment system standards 9. When deemed appropriate by the Zoning Administrator or the Planning Commission, the subdivider shall provide a vegetative buffer adjacent to delineated wetlands and/or wetlands identified on the National Wetland Inventory Map. 10. The Planning Commission shall consider whether the plat as proposed adequately protects the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the Township by providing for safe and adequate drinking water supply, adequate sewage treatment capacity, safe road access, proper road alignment and proper setbacks and buffering from conflicting land uses. 6.1 General. The following principles, standards and requirements will be applied by the Township in evaluating proposed subdivisions. These are the minimum principles, standards and requirements for the promotion and protection of the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare and shall not preclude the Township from requiring stricter standards or requirements when the conditions merit: 1. Community context. Proposed subdivisions shall be coordinated with existing nearby development so that the community as a whole may develop harmoniously based on the minimum standards of this Ordinance. 2. Comprehensive plan. Proposed subdivisions shall be designed in recognition of the general policies included in the Corinna Township Comprehensive Plan. 3. Land/soil suitability. Land that the Township finds to be unsuitable for subdivision or development due to flooding, improper drainage, steep Corinna Township 4(d) - 3 October 14, 2014

slopes, rock formations, adverse earth formations or topography, utility easements, or other features that will reasonably be harmful to the safety, health, and general welfare of the present or future inhabitants of the subdivision and/or its surrounding areas, shall not be subdivided or developed unless adequate methods are formulated by the developer and approved by the Township Board to solve the problems created by the unsuitable land conditions. Such land shall be set aside for uses as shall not involve any danger to public health, safety, and welfare. The following areas are unsuitable for development: a. Flood Plain Areas. No land shall be subdivided in designated flood plain areas or areas that may be subject to flooding unless the proposed subdivision complies with the standards of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), complies with Wright County or State of Minnesota Floodplain regulations and is proposed in combination with buildable areas. b. Wetlands. Wetlands or wetland buffer areas, as defined and classified under the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991, shall not be included in calculating the square footage of the buildable area on any lot. 4. Agriculturally Important Lands. a. The Planning Commission may consider the values of agriculturally important lands when making its recommendation on a plat. The Land Capability Classification System and Crop Equivalency Ratios of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) shall be used as guides to determine if agriculturally important lands are within a proposed subdivision. b. In making its recommendation, the Planning Commission may take into consideration, but not be limited to, the following criteria or designated areas: i. Farmability of Parcel. The size, shape, slope, soil quality, topographic limits and vegetative cover. ii. Proximity. Proximity to an urbanizing area or in proximity to conforming non-agricultural uses. iii. Compatibility with Surrounding Uses. Compatibility or separation by distance or screening with surrounding uses. iv. Distance from Agricultural Operations. Located near an existing animal or commercial feedlot as defined in Wright County or State of Minnesota regulations. v. Shoreland Areas. Sensitive areas such as shorelands, vi. bluffs and wetlands are considered. Man-Made or Physical Barriers. Man-made or physical features act as barriers. 5. Conformance to Applicable Rules and Regulations. In addition to the requirements established in these regulations, all subdivision plats shall comply with the following laws, rules, and regulations unless a variance is granted: Corinna Township 4(d) - 4 October 14, 2014

a. Any applicable Township ordinance, engineering standards and all other applicable laws of the Township. b. Any adopted official maps, public utilities plans, Public Capital Improvement Programs, or other adopted plans or programs of the Township. c. All applicable statutory provisions. d. The requirements and rules of the Minnesota Health Department, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency or other applicable state or federal agencies. 6. Self-Imposed Restrictions. If the developer places restrictions on any of the land contained in the subdivision greater than those required by the Zoning Ordinance or these regulations, such restrictions or reference to those restrictions shall be recorded in the Developer s Agreement. 7. Adequate Public Facilities. No preliminary plat shall be approved unless the Township Board determines that public facilities will be adequate to support and service the area of the proposed subdivision. Public facilities shall include roads, electric utilities, telecommunications, stormwater, sanitary sewer (when located in any sanitary sewer district), gas or other energy service, or other public services necessary to serve the development as determined by the Township Board. 8. Debris and Waste. No cut trees, timber, or other organic materials of any kind shall be buried in any land, or left or deposited on any lot or street in the subdivision except as approved by the Township. If approved, all areas intended to be used for burying debris shall be shown and noted on the preliminary plat. Areas proposed for the burying of debris shall not be located in or affect the following; buildable areas, driveways, wells, utilities, or drainfield sites.. No debris or waste shall be left in any area of the subdivision at the time of expiration of any developer s agreement or dedication of public improvements. Corinna Township Zoning Ordinance 505. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 505.1 Criteria for Granting Conditional Use Permits In granting a conditional use permit, the Wright County Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Among other things, the County Planning Commission shall make the following findings where applicable. (1) That the Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already Corinna Township 4(d) - 5 October 14, 2014

permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity; (2) That the establishment of the Conditional Use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area; (3) That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or are being provided; (4) That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use; (5) The use is not in conflict with the Policies Plan of the County; and, (6) That adequate measures have been taken or will be taken to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise, and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result. 505.2 Additional Conditions In permitting a new conditional use or the alteration of an existing conditional use, the Planning Commission may impose, in addition to these standards and requirements expressly specified by this Ordinance, additional conditions which the Planning Commission considers necessary to protect the best interest of the surrounding area or the community as a whole. These conditions may include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Increasing the required lot size or yard dimension. (2) Limiting the height, size or location of buildings. (3) Controlling the location and number of vehicle access points. (4) Increasing the street width. (5) Increasing the number of required off-street parking spaces. (6) Limiting the number, size, location or lighting of signs. (7) Requiring diking, fencing, screening, landscaping or other facilities to protect adjacent or nearby property. (8) Designating sites for open space. Corinna Township 4(d) - 6 October 14, 2014

Any change involving structural alterations, enlargements, intensification of use, or similar change not specifically permitted by the Conditional Use Permit issued shall require an amended Conditional Use Permit and all procedures shall apply as if a new permit were being issued. The Wright County Zoning Administrator shall maintain a record of all conditional use permits issued including information on the use, location, and conditions imposed by the Planning Commission; time limits, review dates, and such other information as may be appropriate. 606. SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL R-2 606.1 Purpose The major purpose of this District is to allow for a "rural life-style" by permitting low-density residential development in areas that are marginal or non-feasible for agriculture. 606.4 Conditional Uses Subdivisions - a 2 ½ acre minimum lot subdivision in areas designated as such in the land use plan. Corinna Township Comprehensive Plan The Corinna Township Comprehensive Plan (adopted in 2007) classifies the property and most of the surrounding properties as appropriate for a future land use of Rural Preservation, which is described as: Rural Preservation: A land use designation for properties that are best suited for rural farmsteads and farming. This classification would be most consistent with the Wright County Agricultural zoning classification. The Township believes it prudent to respond to future growth pressure by considering low-density, rural residential development in these areas, utilizing a cluster-style development strategy to maintain the rural character of the community. Wright County Comprehensive Plan The Wright County Comprehensive Plan, just adopted in 2009, classifies the property as appropriate for Residential Large Lot, which is described as: Residential Large Lot Primarily designates those areas that have already been converted to a rural/suburban, residential environment with lot sizes ranging from two to ten acres due to past decisions. Undeveloped lands that are surrounded or nearly surrounded by such patterns may also be included in this district. Existing land types may include large wooded areas, non-productive farmland near existing developed areas, infill on lands near highly developed lakeshore areas and other areas where large lot development may occur without Corinna Township 4(d) - 7 October 14, 2014

posing a threat to the environment, or long term agricultural uses. Appropriate zoning may include Agricultural, Agricultural Residential, R-2(a) and, in special cases, R-2. Rezoning from Agricultural to residential districts will generally be considered appropriate for large lot (R-2a) proposals and for smaller sizes (R-2) in cases where existing development trends or environmental factors are appropriate. Rezoning to R-1 will only be considered for riparian lots on shorelands especially suited to that type of residential development, or for small areas of "infill" which are predominately R-1 already. Staff Findings (Subdivision Criteria): We propose the following findings for consideration by the Planning Commission, based on the criteria for reviewing subdivision applications in the Corinna Township Subdivision Ordinance: 1. The preliminary plat shall conform to all applicable official controls and all state and federal laws. The proposed lots meet all requirements for size, width and depth in the R-2 zoning district. All lots exceed the minimum width of 200 feet, minimum depth of 300 feet and the minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. The remainder lot could be allowed subject to approval as a lot line adjustment. 2. The preliminary plat shall be consistent with the Corinna Township Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that these properties are in an area best suited for rural farmsteads and farming. The Plan states that the Township believes it prudent to respond to future growth pressure by considering low-density, rural residential development in these areas, utilizing a cluster-style development strategy to maintain the rural character of the community. The proposed plat, resulting in a 2.81 and 3.42 acre lot is likely to maintain the rural character of the community. The subdivision, which is in land which as been farmed historically, but is not of a size that is typical for most farmland, should not have a significant impact on continued farming in the area. Several goals within the Comprehensive Plan apply to the proposal. They include: Protect, preserve, and enhance lake water quality. o o Require on-site storm water retention and erosion-control plans for all new lakeshore development and redevelopment of existing sites to ensure that storm water runoff is properly managed and treated before entering surface waters. Limit the amount of grading and filling in the shoreland area so as to minimize the disturbance of soil and prevent erosion. Staff Comment: The applicant has not submitted plans that implement storm water management practices. However, the amount of land that would be altered to develop these lots residentially is not likely to rise to the level that would require a state permit for Corinna Township 4(d) - 8 October 14, 2014

stormwater controls and could be appropriately addressed during the actual construction/development process on the lots. The lots should not need a lot of topographic alteration to develop residentially. Encourage preservation of productive farm operations. o Require developments that may occur in or near productive farmland to design subdivisions in a way that preserves the greatest amount of productive farmland for continued agricultural use. Staff Comment: The subdivision would involve the conversion of land that is currently farmed to residential use. However, it will not have a significant impact on agricultural use of land in the broader area. If preserving this property for farmland were a significant concern, it likely would not have been approved for rezoning by the County. Ensure that all Township properties are adequately and efficiently treating sewage, both for current residents and expected future population growth. Staff Comment: The property would be required to show that there are two sewerable sites on each lot. While this information has not yet been submitted, the lots are large and the soils appear to be suitable for sewer systems. However, this should be confirmed by a licensed sewer designer prior to final plat approval. 3. No plat shall be approved which does not conform to any applicable floodplain regulations. This property is not located in any designated floodplain area. 4. No plat shall be approved unless there is provision for two (2) standard on-site sewage treatment systems for each lot, unless served with public sewer or an approved cluster sewer system serving lots within the subdivision. The proposed lots would be served with private sewer systems. Preliminary soil borings and locations for two septic systems per site should be presented prior to final plat approval. 5. A plat shall not be approved where a variance will subsequently be required in order to use the lots for their intended use. The proposed subdivision would not appear to create the need for any variances for the lots to be developed residentially. 6. No plat shall be approved that does not contain adequate provisions for storm water runoff. If required, no plat shall be approved without an NPDES Phase IIcompliant storm water management plan reviewed and approved by the Township or its designated representative. The plat, as proposed, does not appear to require a NPDES-Phase II stormwater management plan as it would not create more than one acre of new impervious. Corinna Township 4(d) - 9 October 14, 2014

No new roads are being constructed and each lot would only be expected to create about 10-15,000 sq ft of new impervious at the most. 7. Each lot shall have sufficient buildable lot area which, for the purposes of this Ordinance, shall be defined as the contiguous area of a lot which is sufficient in area to accommodate the construction of water supply systems, sewage treatment systems, buildings and driveways, while still providing for adequate setbacks. Areas which are floodways, wetlands, rights-of-way, bluffs or which have soils that are unsuitable for individual sewage treatment systems cannot be included in calculating the buildable area of a lot. The proposed plat does not identify areas for potential location of homes/garages or sewer systems. Given that the lots are all greater than 2.5 acres in size should provide more than adequate room for homes and sewer systems. The ability to provide two sewer sites on each lot should be confirmed prior to final plat approval. 8. Each lot shall be of sufficient size and character to meet applicable sewage treatment system standards. See answer for #4 above. 9. When deemed appropriate by the Zoning Administrator or the Planning Commission, the subdivider shall provide a vegetative buffer adjacent to delineated wetlands and/or wetlands identified on the National Wetland Inventory Map. There do not appear to be any wetlands on the property. 10. The Planning Commission shall consider whether the plat as proposed adequately protects the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the Township by providing for safe and adequate drinking water supply, adequate sewage treatment capacity, safe road access, proper road alignment and proper setbacks and buffering from conflicting land uses. Private wells and sewer would be used for these lots. The properties would each have Township road on three sides one of which is paved and the other two of which are gravel. A road would separate these two lots from the adjacent farmland to the east. Staff Findings (Conditional Use): The following findings of fact are presented by Staff for consideration by the Planning Commission: 1) Will the Conditional use be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, or substantially diminish and impair property values within the immediate vicinity? No. The proposed lot sizes are larger than the minimum 2.5 acres required and should not create any problems for the use and enjoyment of neighboring properties. Corinna Township 4(d) - 10 October 14, 2014

2) Will the establishment of the Conditional Use impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant property for uses predominant in the area? No. See comment #1 in the CUP criteria above. 3) Do adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities exist or will they be provided? Yes. The lots would be served by existing Township roads on three sides of each of the proposed lots. The road between these lots and Sugar Lake do not have defined ditches for drainage and any provision of ditches would not have an outlet to Sugar Lake except by running over the lakeshore lots in the area. 4) Have adequate measures been taken to provide sufficient off-street parking and loading space to serve the proposed use? Yes. The 2.5+ acre lots will provide more than adequate space for off-street parking. 5) Will the use conflict with the Policies Plan of Corinna Township and/or Wright County? See comment #2 in the Subdivision criteria above. 6) Have adequate measures been taken, or will they be taken, to prevent or control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise, and vibration, so that none of these will constitute a nuisance, and to control lighted signs and other lights in such a manner that no disturbance to neighboring properties will result? Yes. The proposed project would not be expected to create any long-term or ongoing nuisance such as are listed above. 7) Are there any other conditions which the Planning Commission considers necessary to protect the best interest of the surrounding area or the community as a whole? Planning Commission Direction: The Planning Commission can approve the request, deny the request, or table the request if additional information is needed. If the decision is for approval or denial, findings of fact should be cited. Staff Recommendation: Based on the findings of fact presented in this report Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision (including the remainder 0.24 acre parcel), with the following conditions of that approval: 1. That the 0.24 acre parcel must be combined into one parcel number and legal description with Lots 1 and 2 of Sugar Lake Heights and the vacated portion of Mol Street (aka Hollister Avenue) that is already part of Parcel 206-079-001010 prior to final plat approval. 2. That the applicants must provide evidence from a licensed sewer designer that there exists at least two sewerable sites on each of the proposed residential lots prior to final plat approval. Corinna Township 4(d) - 11 October 14, 2014

Wright County, MN Date Created: 9/29/2014 Overview 226 ft Legend Roads CSAHCL CTYCL MUNICL PRIVATECL TWPCL City/Township Limits c t Parcels Water 2' Contours 842; 844; 846; 848; 852; 854; 856; 858; 862; 864; 866; 868; 872; 874; 876; 878; 882; 884; 886; 888; 892; 894; 896; 898; 902; 904; 906; 908; 912; 914; 916; 918; 922; 924; 926; 928; 932; 934; 936; 938; 942; 944; 946; 948; 952; 954; 956; 958; 962; 964; 966; 968; 972; 974; 976; 978; 982; 984; 986; 988; 992; 994; 996; 998; 1002; 1004; 1006; 1008; 1012; 1014; 1016; 1018; 1022; 1024; 1026; 1028; 1032; 1034; 1036; 1038; 1042; 1044; 1046; 1048; 1052; 1054; 1056; 1058; 1062; 1064; 1066; 1068; 1072; 1074; 1076; 1078; 1082; 1084; 1086; 1088; 1092; 1094; 1096; 1098; 1102; 1104; 1106; 1108; 1112; 1114; 1116; 1118; 1122; 1124; 1126; 1128; 1132; 1134;

WRIGHT SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 311 Brighton Avenue Suite C Buffalo, MN 55313 Telephone: (763) 682-1933 (763) 682-1970 Fax: (763) 682-0262 October 7, 2014 Thomas & Constance Tart 1807 Timberline TRL Minnetonka, MN 55305 RE: Preliminary plat application to subdivide an approximate 6.47 acre parcel into two lots (2.81 and 3.42 acres) with.024 acre remainder to be attached to an existing nonconforming lakeshore lot. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Tart, The Wright Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) has reviewed and inspected the above mentioned property for preliminary plat application. The Wright SWCD appreciates the opportunity to comment on the preliminary plat application. The Wright SWCD would like to require review of all the building applications in the future development of this property. At that time more detailed comments on erosion and sediment control measures will be addressed on each individual lot per building request. Thank you for keeping in mind those items during future development and if you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact myself or the District. Kind Regards, Dan Nadeau Urban Conservation Specialist Cc: Corinna Township

STAFF REPORT Application: Request for a lot line adjustment between two nonconforming lots of record to transfer 5 ft of land from Lot 5, Shelmires and attach it to Lot 4, Shelmires. Applicant: Karl Enghauser Agenda Item: 4(e) Background Information: Proposal: The applicant is proposing to separate his two lots of record (Lots 4 and 5, Shelmires - originally platted in 1967), but also to take the southern five feet of Lot 5 and keep it with Lot 4. The lot line adjustment would provide an approximate 8 foot setback from the existing home on Lot 4 to the (proposed) lot line rather than the current approiximate 3 ft setback. It would reduce the lot width of Lot 5 from 105 ft to 100 ft at the lake. Location: o Property address: 7112 108 th Street NW o Sec/Twp/Range: 11-121-027 o Parcel number(s): 206071001040 Zoning: Urban/Rural Transition (R1) /Residential Recreation Shorelands (S-2) Overlay District, Sugar Lake (General Development lake) Lot size: Approx. 1.83 acres (both lots combined); Approx. 1.18 acres (Lot 4 as originally platted); Approx. 28,314 sq ft (Lot 5 as originally platted); Approx 26,729 sq ft (Lot 5 as proposed). All measurements based on Beacon GIS estimates. Existing Impervious Coverage (Lot 4 as originally platted): Buildings: Approx. 4,000 sq ft (7.8%) Total: Approx. 8,500 sq ft (16.5%) Existing Impervious Coverage (Lot 5 as proposed): Buildings: Approx. 660 sq ft (2.5%) Total: Approx. 1,860 sq ft (7.0%) Septic System Status: Lot 4, with the existing home, has a 1985 sewer system that is in the process of being checked for compliance. Lot 5 has had preliminary septic design work completed and been found suitable for a Type I sewer system (mound). Natural Features: o o o Floodplain: The property is not within an identified floodplain. Bluff/Steep Slopes: The property does not contain any steep slopes or bluff. Wetlands: There appears to be a wetland on Lot 4 near the road, but it would not significantly impact the development of Lot 5. Corinna Township 4(e) - 1 October 14, 2014

Permit History: o 1968 30 x 64 dwelling o 1979 Septic system o 1985 Septic system Applicable Statutes/Ordinances: 404 LOTS OF RECORD Corinna Township/Wright County Regulations Lots of record in the office of the County Recorder prior to the effective date of this Ordinance may be allowed as residential building sites provided: (1) They have frontage on an existing public right-of-way or have frontage on an existing easement or other private roadway existing prior to January 1, 1977. (2) They have at least 20,000 square feet of area. Lots smaller than 20,000 square feet may be used as dwelling sites if the owner can prove that adequate sanitary facilities can be provided. Said sanitary facilities must be located on the same lot of record as the dwelling, or on adjacent land which is legally available to the owner. Extraordinary alteration of the lot through land filling or excavation shall not constitute proof of an adequate site for sanitary facilities. 502.5 Other Duties of the Board of Adjustment (2) Lot Line Adjustments The Board of Adjustment may review lots of record in the office of the County Recorder which do not meet standards established by this Ordinance for size, width, elevation, depth, or other provisions. The Board may require that such parcels be joined, combined, modified in size, shape, or other ways to more nearly achieve the standards of this Ordinance if the owner wishes to use such parcels as building sites. The Board may initiate such proceedings or may act upon request of the property owner. If the Board determines that the lot is not acceptable as a building site, the Zoning Administrator shall provide a copy of the Board s findings to the Wright County Assessor. 605. URBAN/RURAL TRANSITIONAL R-1 605.5 Performance Standards (5) Lot Area Regulations: (a) For dwelling units with private on-site sewage treatment systems water wells - one (1) acre. Corinna Township 4(e) - 2 October 14, 2014

(6) Lot Width and Depth Regulations: (a) For dwelling units with private sewage treatment systems: Lot Width - 150 feet (200 feet in shoreland classified as Natural Environment). Lot Depth - 150 feet. (7) Structures may be so located on each lot such that subdivision is possible when central sewer and water facilities become available. Findings of Fact: The following findings of fact are presented by Staff for consideration by the Board of Adjustment: 1. Will the proposed lot line adjustment result in the standards of the Zoning Ordinance being more nearly achieved? a) Needs discussion. The proposed alteration of the lot lines will obviously make Lot 5 smaller than it is now. However, Lot 5 (as adjusted) would still meet the minimum requirements of the DNR for lakeshore lots on a General Development lake (100 ft wide, 20,000 sq ft), can have a Type I sewer system installed, and meets the requirements of Section 404. It appears that a reasonably sized home could also be built on Lot 5 (as adjusted) while still meeting the 15% building and 25% overall impervious limits. Perhaps most relevantly, the proposed adjustment would improve the side yard setback of the existing home from the originally platted lots lines from about 3 feet to about 8 feet (min. 15 ft required). So long as Lot 4 either has an existing compliant sewer system, or can have such a system installed, it would appear that the proposed alteration will on balance more nearly achieve the standards of the Zoning Ordinance at least in terms of the side yard setback for the existing home. Board of Adjustment Direction: The Board of Adjustment may approve the variance request, deny the request(s), or table the request(s) if the Board should need additional information from the applicant. If the Board should approve or deny the request, the Board should state the findings which support either of these actions. Staff Recommendation: Based on the findings of fact and discussion above, Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed lot line adjustment upon the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provides evidence that Lot 4 (with the existing home) is already, or will be, served with a compliance sewer system. 2. (For discussion) That the applicant provides evidence that both of the proposed lots have space for two Type I sewer drainfields. Corinna Township 4(e) - 3 October 14, 2014