REXFORD ROAD (100' PUBLIC R/W) EXISTING RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ACCESS CONNECTION TO REMAIN EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN 50' SETBACK FROM BACK OF CURB PARKING

Similar documents
4 CORNERS PHASE 2 REZONING SUBMITTAL SAM NEWELL ROAD MATTHEWS, NORTH CAROLINA MARCH 28, 2018

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

Section 1. Appendix A, "Zoning" of the Code of the City of Charlotte is hereby amended as follows:

O-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)

REZONING PETITION NO

ARTICLE 143. PD 143.

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT

EXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD

(voice) (fax) (voice) (fax) Site Plan Review

Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit

(a) Commercial uses on Laurel Avenue, abutting the TRO District to the

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation June 29, 2017

LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Town of Cary, North Carolina Site Plan Staff Report Centregreen Park at Weston (13-SP-067) Town Council Quasi-Judicial Hearing April 3, 2014

Report to the Plan Commission August 20, 2012

ARTICLE 887. PD 887. Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District

CHAPTER XVIII SITE PLAN REVIEW

ARTICLE 9 SPECIFICATIONS FOR DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED

LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT

Commercial Property with Great Visibility for Sale or Lease. For Sale at $1,500, or For Lease at $12.00/SF NNN

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis May 21, 2018

LINCOLN COUNTY PLANNING & INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH ROYALTON, OHIO

a. To insure compatible relationships between land use activities;


ARTICLE 24 SITE PLAN REVIEW

FAIRVIEW ROAD VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY D.B. 5362, PG. 939 D.B. 5429, PG. 89 D.B. 5429, PG. 453 MUDD-O MUDD(CD) LOT 3

1. Approval of Plans and Specifications/Architectural Review Procedure.

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Commercial Property with Great Visibility for Sale or Lease. For Sale at $1,500, or For Lease at $12.00/SF NNN

Staff recommends approval of this innovative request.

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No

PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Annex, 66 Prospect St., Ridgefield, CT Fax

Zoning Regulations of the Town of Redding Connecticut

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF GRAND RAPIDS COUNTY OF KENT, MICHIGAN. At a regular meeting of the Township Board of the Charter Township of Grand Rapids, held

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

ARTICLE XXVIII. SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (Ord. No. 2835, 07/01/0; Ord. No. 2938, 10/19/04; Ord. No. 09/06/16))

Administrative Review Application Blair Township, Grand Traverse County. Blair Township

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

Exhibit D. Tallow Ridge PUD. Written Description. Date: January 5, E. City Development Number:

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING)

ARTICLE V SIGN REGULATIONS

CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

McGowin Park, LLC. B-3, Community Business District

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis February 19, 2018

ARTICLE 10 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS

ORDINANCE NO. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Abilene, Texas:

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation January 4, 2017

MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application

TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM ORDINANCE NO

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 15, 2019

ARTICLE 573. PD 573.

FOR SALE 3520 and 3533 Watson Rd, St. Louis, MO 63139

PERMITTED USES: Within the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District the following uses are permitted:

SAFEWAY - OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA PLANNING REVISIONS 1 - JULY 26, 2010

ARTICLE 759. PD 759. PD 759 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on June 27, (Ord. Nos.

CHAPTER MFR 22 Multi-Family Residential

CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING)

Request Modification of Proffers Modification of Conditions (Bulk Storage Yard) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Marchelle Coleman

Chair to close public hearing. Review Deadline: 60 Days: 8/18/ Days: 10/17/2017

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 17, 2016

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT MAY TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENT. A. Purpose

Commercial Building for Lease. For Lease at $10.00/SF Gross + Expenses

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED,

Investment Opportunity: Crescent Village Shopping Center for Sale. For Sale at $1,800,000.00

Protective Covenants. Large Rail Site Phase 1

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: August 20, 2015

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis December 4, 2018

CITY OF SPRINGDALE, OHIO SPRINGDALE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD PIKE SPRINGDALE, OHIO TELEPHONE: (513)

Community Development Department Council Chambers, 7:30 PM, June 7, 2018

SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT (Zone BSC)

1 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing

BE IT ORDAINED by the Township Council of the Township of West Windsor, County of

FACT SHEET DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA NO. 91 UNIVERSITY PLACE RESIDENCES DEVELOPMENT

CITY OF SPRINGDALE, OHIO SPRINGDALE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD PIKE SPRINGDALE, OHIO TELEPHONE: (513)

CITY OF SPRINGDALE, OHIO SPRINGDALE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD PIKE SPRINGDALE, OHIO TELEPHONE: (513)

WIREGRASS RANCH DRI/MPUD MASTER ROADWAY PLAN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PDD DRC

Re: Case # ZP Preplanning Application for 8 townhomes at 1526 Ingalls Street in Lakewood, CO.

SCHEDULE B. Comprehensive Mixed Use Sign and Awning Package Replacing Section VI.P.3 of the Redevelopment Plan As amended January 22, 2013

City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report

ARB AGENDA APPEARANCE REVIEW BOARD

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

Min. Lot Frontage (Ft.) 1. Min. Front Yard (Ft.) Min. Rear Yard (Ft.) R , R , R ,

ZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: September 15, 2011

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 58 Article 11: OS-ARC Office Service-Ann Arbor Road Corridor District ARTICLE XI OS-ARC

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts

SEE PAGE 4 FOR 2018 CALENDAR OF MEETINGS CITY OF BROOKFIELD PLAN COMMISSION AND PLAN REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES AND APPLICATION CHECKLIST

RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and

Zoning Variances. Overview of

Transcription:

3 GRAHAM STREET, NC 8 74.333.35 WWW.LADESIGN.COM FULL MOVEMENT ACCESS CURB TO REXFORD ROAD ( PUBLIC R/W) 8 PLANTING STRIP 8 SIDEWALK 4 SETBACK FROM BACK OF CURB RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ACCESS CONNECTION TO MID-BLOCK CROSSING PER DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY (FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED DURING PERMITTING PROCESS). TREES A VEGETATION TO BE PRESERVED CURB TO BUILDING (BUILDING TO A BE RENOVATED) 5 SETBACK FROM BACK OF CURB Beacon Investment Corp. DROP-OFF LOCATION LOADING ZONE * * DECK AREA / DROP-OFF PLAZA BUILDING AREA / DROP-OFF PLAZA * DROP-OFF LOCATION DUMPSTER LOCATION TO 7-5 FULL MOVEMENT ACCESS PEDESTRIAN COCA-COLA (FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED DURING PERMITTING PROCESS) MINIMUM 5 WIDE PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE SIDEWALK MINIMUM 5 WIDE PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE SIDEWALK STRIPED CROSSWALK PEDESTRIAN MARRIOTT A SPECIALTY SHOPS SOUTHPARK (FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED DURING PERMITTING PROCESS) VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SUBMITTAL 6//7 8/4/7 6//7 3:9 PM ALLS N:\_7\\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\RZ-.G Paragon Commercial Bank GRE Speciality Shops LLC Rexford Rd Morrison Blvd Sharon Rd ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 4" X 36" HORZ: "=3 5 3 6 TECHNICAL DATA SHEET RZ-

DEVELOPMENT STAARDS. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. THESE DEVELOPMENT STAARDS FORM A PART OF THE PLAN (COMPRISED OF SHEETS RZ- THROUGH RZ5-) ASSOCIATED WITH THE PETITION FILED BY REXFORD OFFICE HOLDINGS, LLC (THE PETITIONER ) FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 3.46 ACRE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF REXFORD ROAD, BETWEEN COCA-COLA PLAZA A ROXBOROUGH ROAD, WHICH IS MORE PARTICULARLY DEPICTED ON THE PLAN (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE ). THE IS COMPRISED OF TAX PARCEL NO. 77-83-3. F. ALL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE APPROVED A CONSTRUCTED BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE OR PHASED PER THE S DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 5. ARCHITECTURAL A DESIGN STAARDS A. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IN STORIES OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE 4 STORIES. B. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IN FEET OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE 7 FEET. 3 GRAHAM STREET, NC 8 74.333.35 WWW.LADESIGN.COM B. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE WILL BE GOVERNED BY THE PLAN, THESE DEVELOPMENT STAARDS A THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF ZONING ORDINANCE (THE "ORDINANCE"). SUBJECT TO THE OPTIONAL PROVISIONS SET OUT BELOW, THE REGULATIONS ESTABLISHED UER THE ORDINANCE FOR THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ( MUDD ) ZONING DISTRICT SHALL GOVERN THE DEVELOPMENT A USE OF THE. C. THE DEVELOPMENT A USES DEPICTED ON THE PLAN A THE DRAWINGS ARE SCHEMATIC IN NATURE A ARE INTEED TO DEPICT THE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF USES A IMPROVEMENTS (WHICH INCLUDE THE BUILDING A THE STRUCTURED FACILITY) ON THE. ACCORDINGLY, THE LAYOUT, LOCATIONS A SIZES OF THE USES, IMPROVEMENTS A ELEMENTS DEPICTED ON THE PLAN AS WELL AS THE INTERNAL DRIVES A AREAS ARE SCHEMATIC IN NATURE A, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF THESE DEVELOPMENT STAARDS A THE ORDINANCE, ARE SUBJECT TO MINOR ALTERATIONS OR MODIFICATIONS DURING THE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT A CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASES. C. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IN FEET OF THE STRUCTURED FACILITY SHALL BE 46 FEET. D. SET OUT ON SHEETS RZ4- A RZ4- OF THE PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL, ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES OF EACH ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING AFTER THE EXPANSION A RENOVATION OF THE BUILDING. THESE CONCEPTUAL, ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES ARE INTEED TO REFLECT THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE A CHARACTER OF THE BUILDING AFTER THE EXPANSION A RENOVATION OF THE SAME, HOWEVER, THE ACTUAL ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING AFTER THE EXPANSION A RENOVATION OF THE SAME MAY VARY FROM THE CONCEPTUAL, ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES PROVIDED THAT THE DESIGN INTENT IS SATISFIED. E. NOTWITHSTAING THE TERMS OF PARAGRAPH D ABOVE, THE TREE MOTIF A GREEN WALL DEPICTED ON THE REAR ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING A THE BLUE PANELS DEPICTED ON THE STRUCTURED PARK FACILITY ARE OPTIONAL ELEMENTS, A THEY MAY OR MAY NOT BE INCORPORATED INTO THESE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE OPTION OF PETITIONER. D. THE PURPOSES OF THIS REQUEST ARE TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXPANSION A RENOVATION OF THE BUILDING LOCATED ON THE (THE BUILDING ) A THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STRUCTURED FACILITY ON THE (THE STRUCTURED FACILITY ). F. THE PRIMARY EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS FOR THE BUILDING AFTER THE EXPANSION A RENOVATION OF THE SAME ARE DESIGNATED ON THE CONCEPTUAL, ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES SET OUT ON SHEETS RZ4- A RZ4- OF THE PLAN. E. EXCEPT FOR THE RENOVATIONS A MODIFICATIONS TO THE BUILDING THAT ARE DEPICTED ON THE PLAN A ON THE CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES SET OUT ON SHEETS RZ4- A RZ4-, THE BUILDING WILL BE PRESERVED. F. FUTURE AMEMENTS TO THE PLAN A/OR THESE DEVELOPMENT STAARDS MAY BE APPLIED FOR BY THE THEN OWNER OR OWNERS OF THE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 6 OF THE ORDINANCE. ALTERATIONS TO THE PLAN ARE SUBJECT TO SECTION 6.7 OF THE ORDINANCE.. OPTIONAL PROVISIONS THE OPTIONAL PROVISIONS SET OUT BELOW SHALL APPLY TO THE. A. WALL SIGNS INSTALLED ON THE BUILDING MAY HAVE UP TO SQUARE FEET OF SIGN SURFACE AREA PER WALL OR % OF THE WALL AREA TO WHICH THEY ARE ATTACHED, WHICHEVER IS LESS. B. A GROU MOUNTED MONUMENT SIGN WITH A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 6 FEET A A MAXIMUM SIGN AREA OF 36 SQUARE FEET MAY BE INSTALLED ON THE. C. A GROU MOUNTED MONUMENT SIGN MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE SETBACK FROM REXFORD ROAD. D. IN ADDITION TO ALL OTHER SIGNS ALLOWED IN THE MUDD ZONING DISTRICT (AS MODIFIED BY THESE OPTIONAL PROVISIONS), A ONE ROOF SIGN MAY BE INSTALLED ON THE REXFORD ROAD ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING ON THE TOP PORTION OF THE CURTAIN WALL IN THE LOCATION DESIGNATED AS SIGNAGE ON THE CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES. THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA OF THE THIS ROOF SIGN SHALL BE SQUARE FEET. E. THE OPTIONAL PROVISIONS REGARDING SIGNAGE ARE AN ADDITION/MODIFICATION TO THE STAARDS FOR SIGNS IN THE MUDD ZONING DISTRICT A ARE TO BE USED WITH THE DER OF THE MUDD STAARDS FOR SIGNS THAT ARE NOT MODIFIED BY THESE OPTIONAL PROVISIONS. G. THE EXPANSION A RENOVATION OF THE BUILDING A THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE STRUCTURED FACILITY MAY NOT OCCUR SIMULTANEOUSLY. THEREFORE, A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE EXPAED A RENOVATED BUILDING SHALL NOT BE WITHHELD OR DELAYED IN THE EVENT THAT THE STRUCTURED PARK FACILITY IS NOT COMPLETED AT THE TIME THAT THE EXPAED A RENOVATED BUILDING IS COMPLETED, PROVIDED THAT THE COMPLIES WITH THE OFF-STREET REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE AT SUCH TIME. H. DUMPSTER A RECYCLING AREAS WILL BE ENCLOSED ON ALL FOUR SIDES BY AN OPAQUE WALL OR FENCE WITH ONE SIDE BEING A HINGED OPAQUE GATE. IF ONE OR MORE SIDES OF A DUMPSTER A RECYCLING AREA ADJOIN A SIDE WALL OR REAR WALL OF A BUILDING, THEN THE SIDE WALL OR REAR WALL OF THE BUILDING MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE WALL OR FENCE ALONG EACH SUCH SIDE. 6. STREETSCAPE A LASCAPING A. PETITIONER SHALL INSTALL A MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDE PLANTING STRIP A A MINIMUM 6 8 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE S FRONTAGE ON REXFORD ROAD AS GENERALLY DEPICTED ON THE PLAN. NOTWITHSTAING THE FOREGOING, THE THE SIDEWALK MAY MEAER TO SAVE TREES PROVIDED THAT A MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDE PLANTING STRIP IS MAINTAINED. ANY PORTION OF THE SIDEWALK THAT IS LOCATED OUT OF THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR REXFORD ROAD MAY BE LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK UTILITY EASEMENT. B. THE BUILDING SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB ON REXFORD ROAD. OUTDOOR AN OUTDOOR SEATING A AMENITY AREAS AREA SHALL BE PERMITTED LOCATED WITHIN THE FIRST FEET OF THE SETBACK CLOSEST TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING AS GENERALLY DEPICTED ON THE PLAN. THE OUTDOOR SEATING A AMENITY AREA WILL CONTAIN HARDSCAPE A LASCAPING, A IT WILL CONTAIN SEATING ELEMENTS A TABLES PROVIDED THAT SUCH ITEMS MAY NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY A A MINIMUM 8 FOOT WIDE CLEAR SIDEWALK ZONE IS MAINTAINED. C. THE SURFACE LOTS TO ON THE SHALL BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE. 7-5 F. THE BUILDING ENTRANCE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 9.856()(H) OF THE ORDINANCE SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE BUILDING. G. SINCE THE STRUCTURED FACILITY IS LOCATED TO THE REAR OF THE BEHI THE BUILDING, THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 9.856()(A) OF THE ORDINANCE SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE STRUCTURED FACILITY. NOTWITHSTAING THE FOREGOING, A MINIMUM 4 INCH TALL CRASH WALL WILL BE PROVIDED TO SCREEN CARS PARKED IN THE STRUCTURED FACILITY. H. AN OUTDOOR SEATING A AMENITY AREA SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE FIRST FEET OF THE 4 SETBACK CLOSEST TO THE FACE OF THE BUILDING. 3. PERMITTED USES/DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS A. THE MAY ONLY BE DEVOTED TO THE USES SET OUT BELOW. () PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS A GENERAL OFFICE USES AS ALLOWED IN THE MUDD ZONING DISTRICT TOGETHER WITH ANY INCIDENTAL OR ACCESSORY USES ASSOCIATED THEREWITH THAT ARE PERMITTED UER THE ORDINANCE IN THE MUDD ZONING DISTRICT. () A STRUCTURED FACILITY AS AN ACCESSORY USE. B. THE MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE 77, SQUARE FEET. C. THE GROSS FLOOR AREA OF THE STRUCTURED FACILITY SHALL NOT BE COUNTED TOWARDS THE MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA OF THE BUILDING. 4. TRANSPORTATION A. VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL BE AS GENERALLY DEPICTED ON THE PLAN. THE PLACEMENT A CONFIGURATION OF THE ACCESS POINTS ARE SUBJECT TO ANY MINOR MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ( CDOT ). B. THE ALIGNMENT OF THE INTERNAL VEHICULAR CIRCULATION AREAS A DRIVEWAYS MAY BE MODIFIED BY PETITIONER TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGES IN TRAFFIC PATTERNS, LAYOUTS A ANY ADJUSTMENTS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL BY CDOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE PUBLISHED STAARDS. D. LASCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE S FRONTAGE ON REXFORD AS GENERALLY DEPICTED ON THE PLAN. THE LASCAPING MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED SHALL COMPLEMENT A BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LASCAPING MATERIALS THAT WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG TAX PARCEL NO. 77-83-S FRONTAGE ON REXFORD ROAD PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 6-66. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES A. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED A ADOPTED POST CONSTRUCTION CONTROLS ORDINANCE. B. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF TREE ORDINANCE. 8. SIGNS A. SUBJECT TO THE OPTIONAL PROVISIONS SET OUT IN THESE DEVELOPMENT STAARDS, ALL SIGNS INSTALLED ON THE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE. B. THE LOCATIONS OF THE SIGNS INSTALLED ON THE BUILDING MAY VARY FROM THE SIGN LOCATIONS DEPICTED ON THE CONCEPTUAL, ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES. 9. LIGHTING A. ANY NEWLY INSTALLED FREESTAING LIGHTING FIXTURES ON THE (EXCLUDING LOWER, DECORATIVE LIGHTING THAT MAY BE INSTALLED ALONG THE INTERNAL PRIVATE DRIVES A SIDEWALKS, LASCAPING LIGHTING A UPLIGHTING FOR THE BUILDING OR THE STRUCTURED FACILITY) SHALL BE FULLY CAPPED A SHIELDED A THE ILLUMINATION DOWNWARDLY DIRECTED SO THAT DIRECT ILLUMINATION DOES NOT EXTE PAST ANY PROPERTY LINE OF THE. B. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF ANY NEWLY INSTALLED FREESTAING LIGHTING FIXTURE ON THE, INCLUDING ITS BASE, SHALL BE 34 FEET. C. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF ANY FREESTAING LIGHTING FIXTURE INSTALLED ON THE TOP LEVEL OF THE STRUCTURED PARK FACILITY, INCLUDING ITS BASE, SHALL BE 4 FEET AS MEASURED FROM THE DRIVE SURFACE. D. ANY LIGHTING FIXTURES ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING OR TO THE STRUCTURED FACILITY SHALL BE DECORATIVE, CAPPED A DOWNWARDLY DIRECTED. VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SUBMITTAL 6//7 8/4/7 C. SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CDOT A ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES, PETITIONER SHALL INSTALL A MINIMUM 6 FOOT WIDE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING (THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ) WITHIN REXFORD ROAD THAT WILL PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM THE TO THAT PARCEL OF LA LOCATED ON THE SIDE OF REXFORD ROAD THAT IS DESIGNATED AS TAX PARCEL NO. 77-8-6 AS GENERALLY DEPICTED ON THE PLAN. THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SHALL BE DETERMINED DURING THE PERMITTING PROCESS. IN THE EVENT THAT PETITIONER CANNOT OBTAIN ALL APPROVALS A PERMITS REQUIRED TO INSTALL THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, THEN PETITIONER SHALL HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO INSTALL THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING. PERMITS FOR THE PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE A CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE BUILDING A/OR THE STRUCTURED FACILITY SHALL NOT BE WITHHELD OR DELAYED IN THE EVENT THAT PETITIONER CANNOT OBTAIN ALL APPROVALS A PERMITS REQUIRED TO INSTALL THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING, OR IN THE EVENT THAT PETITIONER IS WAITING TO RECEIVE THE REQUIRED APPROVALS OR THE DENIAL OF SUCH APPROVALS FOR THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AFTER HAVING APPLIED FOR SUCH APPROVALS. D. PETITIONER SHALL INSTALL A MINIMUM 5 FOOT WIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION THROUGH THE FROM THE 6 8 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK TO BE INSTALLED ALONG THE S FRONTAGE ON REXFORD ROAD TO THOSE PARCELS OF LA DESIGNATED AS TAX PARCEL NOS. 77-83- A 77-83- AS GENERALLY DEPICTED A DESCRIBED ON THE PLAN. THE ACTUAL ROUTE OF THIS THIS PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION SHALL STOP AT THE BOUARY LINE OF THE. THE ACTUAL ROUTE OF THIS PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION SHALL BE DETERMINED DURING THE PERMITTING PROCESS. E. PETITIONER SHALL INSTALL A MINIMUM 5 FOOT WIDE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION THROUGH THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE THAT WILL PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION FROM TAX PARCEL NO. 77-83- THROUGH THE TO TAX PARCEL NO. 77-83-4. THIS PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION WILL STOP AT THE EASTERN A WESTERN BOUARY LINES OF THE, A THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION IS GENERALLY DEPICTED A DESCRIBED ON THE PLAN. THE ACTUAL ROUTE OF THIS PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION SHALL BE DETERMINED DURING THE PERMITTING PROCESS. 6//7 3:9 PM ALLS N:\_7\\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\RZ-.G. BIING EFFECT OF THE DOCUMENTS A DEFINITIONS A. IF THIS PETITION IS APPROVED, ALL COITIONS APPLICABLE TO THE USE A DEVELOPMENT OF THE IMPOSED UER THESE DEVELOPMENT STAARDS A THE PLAN WILL, UNLESS AMEED IN THE MANNER PROVIDED UER THE ORDINANCE, BE BIING UPON A INURE TO THE BENEFIT OF PETITIONER A THE CURRENT A SUBSEQUENT OWNERS OF THE A THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST A ASSIGNS. B. THROUGHOUT THESE DEVELOPMENT STAARDS, THE TERM PETITIONER SHALL BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE THE HEIRS, DEVISEES, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES, SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST A ASSIGNS OF PETITIONER OR THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF THE FROM TIME TO TIME WHO MAY BE INVOLVED IN ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT THEREOF. C. ANY REFERENCE TO THE ORDINANCE HEREIN SHALL BE DEEMED TO REFER TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCE IN EFFECT AS OF THE DATE THIS PETITION IS APPROVED. Rexford Rd Morrison Blvd Sharon Rd ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 4" X 36" HORZ: NTS DEVELOPMENT STAARDS RZ-

FULL MOVEMENT ACCESS 3 GRAHAM STREET, NC 8 74.333.35 WWW.LADESIGN.COM LASCAPE DESIGN IS SCHEMATIC IN NATURE. FINAL DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED DURING THE LA DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. LASCAPING TO COMPLEMENT ADJACENT LASCAPING ON MARRIOTT PROPERTY REXFORD ROAD ( PUBLIC R/W) RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT ACCESS CONNECTION TO MID-BLOCK CROSSING PER DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY (FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED DURING PERMITTING PROCESS). TREES A VEGETATION TO BE PRESERVED OFFICE BUILDING TO A BE RENOVATED WITH ADDITION Beacon Investment Corp. LOADING ZONE STRUCTURED DECK DROP-OFF LOCATION LASCAPE BERM TO TO SCREEN TO LASCAPE DESIGN IS SCHEMATIC IN NATURE. FINAL DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED DURING THE LA DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. LASCAPING TO COMPLEMENT ADJACENT LASCAPING ON MARRIOTT PROPERTY 7-5 STRIPED CROSSWALK PEDESTRIAN MARRIOTT A SPECIALTY SHOPS SOUTHPARK (FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED DURING PERMITTING PROCESS) VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SUBMITTAL 6//7 8/4/7 6//7 3:9 PM ALLS N:\_7\\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\RZ3-.G Paragon Commercial Bank GRE Speciality Shops LLC Rexford Rd Morrison Blvd Sharon Rd ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 4" X 36" HORZ: "=3 5 3 6 SCHEMATIC PLAN RZ3-

3 GRAHAM STREET, NC 8 74.333.35 WWW.LADESIGN.COM 7-5 SUBMITTAL 6//7 8/4/7 HORZ: NTS 6//7 3:9 PM ALLS N:\_7\\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\RZ4-.G ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 4" X 36" ARCHITECTURE ELEVATIONS A PERSPECTIVES RZ4-

3 GRAHAM STREET, NC 8 74.333.35 WWW.LADESIGN.COM 7-5 SUBMITTAL 6//7 8/4/7 HORZ: NTS 6//7 3:9 PM ALLS N:\_7\\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\RZ4-.G ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 4" X 36" ARCHITECTURE ELEVATIONS A PERSPECTIVES RZ4-

L5 5. 66 3 GRAHAM STREET, NC 8 74.333.35 WWW.LADESIGN.COM 66 98.6 S77 3 4 "E 3. 5 (T) 5. 9 66 3.46 66 C S 7 7 34" E 3. C8 C( T) 659 66 5 C3 663 65 7 665 664 T) W LC.94 ( 5 659 Park R South S L6 L7 657 C5 7-5 eal Es 3 tate L 8" 44. N 4 58"E.94 49. (T) C4 n Inve 655 stmen t Corp. 66 665 Beaco L4 663 5. 65 65 C9 656 655 C6 LC 65 Park R eal Es L8 tate L 64 8 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE SUBMITTAL 6//7 8/4/7 C7 South N79 648 6 " W 56.47 ps LL C N:\_7\\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\RZ5-.G Mo HORZ: "=3 Blv d 5 3 on R d ar rris on Sh ity Sh o GRE S pecial mmer ci on Co Parag ALLS Rd 6//7 3:9 PM Rexfo rd al Ban k VICINITY MAP - NOT TO COITIONS PLAN ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 4" X 36" RZ5-6