Appendix B: Housing Element Sites Inventory and Detailed Analysis

Similar documents
Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

APPENDIX B RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY

1500 INDUSTRIAL WAY, REDWOOD CITY

PUBLIC NOTICE* Studies Requested: Parking analysis. Other Required Permits: Building Permit, Site Development Permit

Plan Area and Current Facilities

LAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN

A. SUMMARY OF SITE INVENTORY FINDINGS

Village of Port Jefferson Urban Renewal Plan

APPROVED LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN MAJOR APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MISSION BAY

Chapter 5: Testing the Vision. Where is residential growth most likely to occur in the District? Chapter 5: Testing the Vision

Creative Approaches to Land Acquisition

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Housing. Approved and Adopted by City Council November 13, City Council Resolution City Council Resolution

1102 SOUTH THIRD STREET SAN JOSE, CA.

LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS REPORT POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WEST WHITELAND TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PA

Planning Justification Report

Wheaton Sector Plan. Preliminary. Recommendations. Montgomery County Planning Board

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016

Community Workshop #1 October 15, Redwood City. Regulatory Approaches to Implementing a Community Benefits Program

MAIN STREET. 925 Main Street Redwood City, CA

Town of Yucca Valley GENERAL PLAN 1

Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Build-Out Analysis. City of Buffalo, New York. Prepared by:

Sheridan Station Apartments

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

FEASIBILITY REPORT. 1486, 1490 and 1494 Clementine. Prepared by: Lloyd Phillips & Associates Ltd. For: Ottawa Salus

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

City of Cupertino AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act Annual & Five Year Report for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2014 & 2015

New challenges for urban renewal... Patrick Fensham Principal SGS Economics and Planning

Updating the Housing Element Planning for your Community s Future

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

DRAFT. Amendment to the Master Plan Land Use Element for Block 5002, Lot Township of Teaneck, Bergen County, New Jersey.

5. Land Acquisition and Displacement

Residential Capacity Estimate

Rule 80. Preservation of Primary Agricultural Soils Revised and approved by the Land Use Panel during its public meeting on January 31, 2006.

SanJose. Memorandum. \\[i[ Or. FROM: Jacky Morales-Ferrand TO: RULES AND OPEN GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE. SUBJECT: ALMADEN ROAD DATE: November 1, 2017

Conditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC

N o v e m b e r 9, Concept Alternatives. J o i n t C i t y C o u n c i l a n d P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n W o r k s h o p

4.13 Population and Housing

General Plan. Page 44

UrbanFootprint Place Types. Urban Mixed Use. Urban Residential. Urban Commercial. Residential 1% SF Large Lot 0%

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES

Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Alley Closure

OFFERING MEMORANDUM. Infill Redevelopment Site Los Altos, CA 4896 EL CAMINO REAL LOS ALTOS, CA

GATEWAY TO LOS ALTOS

CITY OF PORT ORCHARD

North Hanley Station. o Flower Valley Shopping Center o Cross Keys Shopping Cente #49 North Lindbergh MetroBus

Missing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon

When the Plan is not Enough

MEADOWBROOK FLATS SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT RICHMOND (WARD 8) RICHMOND ROAD SW AND 24 STREET SW BYLAWS 10P2018 AND 52D2018

THE MARIN COUNTY HOUSING ELEMENT AND TAM VALLEY

PROPOSED METRO JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: POLICIES AND PROCESS July 2015 ATTACHMENT B

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Existing Land Use. Typical densities for single-family detached residential development in Cumberland County: 1

2.0 LAND USE FRAMEWORK

Table of Contents. Concept Plan Overview. Statement of Compliance with Design Guidelines. Statement of Compliance with Comprehensive Plan

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2014 November 06. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

Northern Branch Corridor DEIS December Appendix D: Local Tax Base

WASHTENAW COUNTY BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACT 381 WORK PLAN TO CONDUCT ELIGIBLE DEQ RESPONSE AND/OR MSF NON-ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. City Planning Commission Staff Report. Executive Summary

CPC CA 3 SUMMARY

Chapter 7 Riverfront District

Medical Office Building / Residential Development Site

RECOMMENDATION(S) OF THE CALGARY PLANNING COMMISSION

CHAPTER COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

Planning Justification Report

HOUSING ISSUES REPORT

January 7, Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN Dear Ms. Smith,

LAND USE AMENDMENT SOUTHWOOD (WARD 11) MACLEOD TRAIL S AND ANDERSON ROAD SW BYLAWS 140D2018 AND 141D2018

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda Public Hearing Item

G. HRA Member Area Surveys a. Area 1 Survey Sample b. Area 1-10 descriptions for surveys

RESOLUTION NO. OB 14-02

Housing & Residential Intensification Study Discussion Paper Township of King

Forest Park DeBaliviere Station

Planning Justification Report

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title ) Table A

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH. CITY COUNCIL POLICY No HOUSING POLICY

Northwest Quadrant. Aerial Photographs. I th Ave Atlantic Ave 1 st St. SW 10 th /Atlantic SW 8 th /Atlantic

A 290-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN SAN JOSE

PLANNING AND REGULATING HOUSING OPTIONS FOR CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS

COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS & IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN VARIOUS CITIES

PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA WORK SESSION AGENDA Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Director, Community Planning, North York District NNY 23 OZ and NNY 23 RH

Dr af t Sant a Bar b ar a Count y Housing Elem ent

1061 The Queensway - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

1ST & MAIN 1025 S. MAIN STREET, LAS VEGAS, NV 89101

Sherwood Forest (Trinity) Housing Corporation. Urban Design Brief

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

Address: 2025 Agassiz Road Applicant: Cristian Anca. RM5 Medium Density Multiple Housing

pendix C.Housing Resources

Master Plan Review SILVER SPRING CBD. Approved and Adopted February Updated January 2013

Transcription:

Appendix B: 2015-2023 Housing Element Sites Inventory and Detailed Analysis Redwood City General

This page intentionally left blank. Redwood City General

Site Identifier Assessor Parcel Number General Zone Density Allowed (du/ac) Acres Realistic Capacity Infrastructure Existing Use/Constraints PDA Potential CEQA Streamlining El Camino 52064100 MU-N MUN 40 0.30 10 yes vacant ECR - - Avondale 52064110 MU-N MUN 40 0.14 5 yes vacant ECR - - Iris 53011190 MDR R-2 16 0.18 2 yes vacant - - - Jefferson 53035310 HDR R-4 40 0.11 1 yes vacant TPA - - Middlefield 53145230 HDR R-4 40 0.27 3 yes vacant TPA - - Middlefield 53145260 HDR R-4 40 0.20 2 yes vacant TPA - - Elm 53245160 HDR R-4 40 0.17 1 yes vacant TPA - - Spruce 53361090 HDR R-3 20 0.11 1 yes vacant - - - Hoover 55043340 MDR R-2 16 0.15 1 yes vacant - - - Gordon 59055200 MDR R-3 20 0.22 2 yes vacant - - - Orchard 59113470 MDR R-2 16 0.11 1 yes vacant - - - 1-910 Marshall 53203070 MU-D DTPP N/A yes medical office, 1.06 100 Downtown/TPA PDA/TPA parking 2-1833 Broadway 53234020 discount grocery MU-D DTPP N/A 1.63 100 yes Downtown/TPA PDA/TPA 53234010 store, parking 3 - Winslow Parking Lot 52362150 MU-D DTPP N/A yes parking lot Downtown/TPA PDA/TPA 0.5 100 4 - James/California 52354030 MU-D DTPP N/A 2.22 200 yes parking lot Downtown/TPA PDA/TPA 52352010 53171040 5 - Jefferson/ Franklin 6-204 Franklin 53171030 53171080 53171020 53171010 53171060 53171070 53176150 53176010 MU-D DTPP N/A 1.27 100 yes MU-D DTPP N/A 0.66 60 yes light industrial buildings and one small multi-family apartment building light industrial/office buildings Downtown/TPA Downtown/TPA PDA/TPA PDA/TPA Redwood City General Page B-1

Site Identifier 7 - Bradford Concept 8 - Marshall/Hamilton 9 - Broadway/Jefferson 10-1900 Broadway 11-860 Walnut Site A - N. Main Site B - Walnut Site C - Veterans Site D - Corp Yard Assessor Parcel Number 52372130 52372220 52372170 52372240 52372999 52364110 52364130 52368120 52368130 53231200 53231210 53233070 53233060 52383370 52383360 52383350 52385030 52385050 52434030 54011060 General Zone Density Allowed (du/ac) Acres Realistic Capacity MU-D DTPP N/A 0.8 60 yes MU-D DTPP N/A 1.38 180 yes Existing Use/Constraints vacant/temporary parking bank, County Law Library PDA Downtown/TPA Downtown/TPA Potential CEQA Streamlining PDA/TPA PDA/TPA MU-D DTPP N/A 0.86 100 yes bank, parking Downtown/TPA PDA/TPA MU-D DTPP N/A 1.61 200 yes bank, parking Downtown/TPA PDA/TPA MU-D DTPP N/A 0.36 60 yes MU-C MU-C MU-C MU-C N. Main PP MU - RC MU - VB MU - GB 74 3.14 209 yes 60 8.46 456 yes 60 2.52 136 yes 60 9.57 516 yes vacant and light industrial/warehouse suface parking, medical office, restaurant Aging commercial center (Toys R Us, Big 5, Footlocker), restaurant, parking Kmart, surface parking Redwood City storage yard Downtown/TPA Infrastructure Veterans- Broadway/TPA Veterans- Broadway/TPA (partial) Veterans- Broadway Veterans- Broadway PDA/TPA PDA/TPA - - - - - - Page B-2 Redwood City General

Site Identifier Assessor Parcel Number General Zone Density Allowed (du/ac) Acres Realistic Capacity Infrastructure Existing Use/Constraints PDA Potential CEQA Streamlining Site E - Broadway Site F - El Camino Real 54012100 54012050 54012130 MU - 54012140 MU-C GB 54012150 54012160 54012170 54012120 59163020 MUN MU-N R-4T, HDR 59163090 CG-R 60 12.17 657 yes Strip commercial center (Big Lots, Denny's, Jack in the Box, CVS, and Foods Co.), parking 40 1.96 70 yes motel, parking Veterans- Broadway - - ECR - - ECR (partial) - - Redwood City General Page B-3

This page intentionally left blank. Page B-4 Redwood City General

Detailed Sites Analysis To show the potential for infill development to meet the remaining RHNA of 1,607 units (after credits from units approved and under construction), a site-by-site analysis was conducted to identify the most suitable sites for residential development. This section provides detailed information on the underutilized sites identified in this Housing Element. In addition to credits from units built and approved, plus vacant parcels that would accommodate residential development, 11 opportunity sites were identified in the Downtown and six sites were identified in areas designated Mixed Use - Corridor, Mixed Use - Neighborhood, and Residential - High, generally clustered on the outskirts of Downtown or along El Camino Real. Combined, these 17 sites could yield 3,447 new housing units. General goals and policies are tailored to encourage a lively, pedestrian-oriented mixed-use Downtown and transit corridors. These sites were identified as being most suitable for redevelopment based on the existing conditions-to-capacity potential, expressed interest in redevelopment by property owners and/or developers, and condition and maintenance of the existing buildings and uses. The permitted density of the identified sites facilitates the development of housing affordable to lower-income households. Redwood City is experiencing a construction boom in 2014, facilitated by the City s locational assets and forward-thinking planning. Stakeholders representing all sites identified in this Housing Element (including both developers and/or property owners) have stated their interest in partial or full redevelopment of these properties with residential or mixed-use development. Due to the sensitive nature of Redwood City General Page B-5

real estate and development, not all information may be revealed regarding the level of redevelopment interest for some sites. Downtown Sites Downtown sites 1 to 11 are all located within the Redwood City Downtown Precise (DTPP) area. The DTPP provides for the expansion of housing choice in Redwood City by encouraging compact, transit-accessible, pedestrian-oriented housing and mixed-use development. To encourage innovation in development, the DTPP does not include a parcel-specific maximum density requirement. This approach has created extensive developer and property owner interest in redevelopment in Downtown Redwood City. Assumed densities on the sites identified here were calculated based on discussions with property owners for potential development proposals and do not reflect any regulatory restriction on density. Table AB-1-1: Downtown Opportunity Sites Site # Name General / Zoning Assumed Residential Density Maximum Stories Acres Parcels Existing Housing Units Potential Housing Units Affordability Level 1 910 Marshall Downtown PP 94 8 1.06 1 0 100 Lower 2 1833 Broadway Downtown PP 61 3-5 1.63 2 0 100 Lower 3 Winslow Parking Lot Downtown PP 200 12 0.5 1 0 100 Lower 4 James/California Downtown PP 90 3-8 2.22 2 0 200 Lower 5 Jefferson/ Franklin Downtown PP 79 8 1.27 7 15 100 Lower 6 204 Franklin Downtown PP 91 8 0.66 2 0 60 Lower 7 Bradford Concept Downtown PP 75 3-8 0.8 5 0 60 Lower 8 Marshall/Hamilton Downtown PP 130 3-12 1.38 2 0 180 Lower 9 Broadway/Jefferson Downtown PP 116 3-12 0.86 2 0 100 Lower 10 1900 Broadway Downtown PP 124 3-8 1.61 2 0 200 Lower 11 860 Walnut Downtown PP 167 5 0.36 2 0 60 Lower Total: 12.76 1,260 Downtown 1 Site Downtown 1, a single large parcel, is located at the intersection of Marshall Street and Walnut Street. Located near the Kaiser Permanente hospital campus, this property is occupied by one-story buildings containing medical offices. Approximately half of the property is occupied by surface parking. Current structures on the property are approximately 40 years old. Given the desirable location and low scale Page B-6 Redwood City General

of the existing building and abundant surface parking, this site is significantly underutilized. The City s analysis estimates a potential for at least 100 new residential units on this large parcel. The property owner has contacted City staff regarding potential redevelopment of the site, including the potential for new housing. Downtown 2 Site Downtown 2 is located on Downtown s popular Broadway Street. This site is currently occupied by a discount grocery story and ample surface parking. The only structure on the site is approximately 65 years old and shows its age. More than half of the site is reserved for surface parking. Local developers have expressed interest and in the past one even submitted a conceptual plan for single-use residential development of the site, which is over 1.6 acres. The City s analysis estimates a potential for 100 new residential units on this site. Downtown 3 Site Downtown 3 is a single parcel approximately a half acre in size owned by Redwood City. Currently used as a surface parking lot, the City released an RFP to solicit development proposals on this site. Multiple proposals were received, and a preferred alternative was chosen that would provide a new residential development. The City is working with the interested developer to move forward with this potential project, which would include an estimated 100 new units. Downtown 4 Site Downtown 4 is located adjacent to the Redwood City Caltrain station. This site s location and size (2.2 acres) make it a prime opportunity site for new residential development. There are no structures of significance on the site; it functions as a bus depot and park-and-ride lot. The property is owned by a transit district which has expressed interest in redeveloping the site as a transit-oriented development. The City s analysis estimates a potential for at least 200 new residential units on this site, in addition to the provision of amenities and public parking facilities for a redesigned train station. The City continues to pursue partnerships with the transit district for transitoriented development on this site. Downtown 5 Site Downtown 5 is comprised of a block of parcels bounded by Franklin, Jefferson, Wilson, and the Caltrain rail tracks. Current uses include a small multi-family apartment building and light industrial uses. One parcel is owned by Redwood City. The developer of a recent Downtown project is working to assemble the parcels on this block to create a cohesive residential development. City staff anticipates a potential Redwood City General Page B-7

application for development on this site in mid-2014, with an estimated 100 new units. Downtown 6 Site 6 consists of two parcels under common ownership. These parcels are owned by a local business owner who intends to relocate his headquarters, which is presently on the site, to a new location in Redwood City. Once that relocation is complete, the property owner has voiced intent to redevelop this site with housing. City staff estimates that a project would involve approximately 60 units. Downtown 7 Site Downtown 7 is located on Bradford Street. The property is vacant and was acquired by the City from the former Redevelopment Agency, with the intention of developing affordable housing. The City had preliminary plans to build 60 units of affordable senior housing. However, due to the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency and the loss of redevelopment housing funds, this project has been postponed. It remains a viable housing site, in close proximity to Downtown and amenities. It is currently being leased to a construction company for storage and parking for construction workers at the nearby Kaiser Hospital project. Completion of the Kaiser project is anticipated by 2015; redevelopment of this site would be anticipated shortly thereafter. Downtown 8 Site Downtown 8 is located on Broadway. It is presently occupied by Chase Bank and the San Mateo County Law Library. The City s analysis estimates a potential for 200 new residential units on this site. Due to the prime location adjacent to Courthouse Square and the underutilized nature of the site (substantial surface parking), there have been discussions with property owners in the past regarding redevelopment. Although the existing uses are operating, this site remains a viable development site due to the potential afforded by the Downtown Precise. Property owners could choose to relocate existing uses, or a new development that combines existing uses with new residential development could be feasible. Downtown 9 City staff has discussed the potential for housing on this site (Downtown 8) with San Mateo County, the property owner of the Law Library. The County completed a Facilities Master in 2011 to evaluate existing uses on County-owned land in the Downtown in Redwood City and identified potential for consolidation and repurposing of particular properties. In particular, the Master assumes that by the years Page B-8 Redwood City General

2015-2020, the Law Library would have relocated from its current site into space in the Hall of Justice. The Law Library on Site 8 includes a relatively small structure and is thus considered underutilized. Due to its location within the Downtown Precise area, with an allowance of up to 12 stories in height, no limit on residential density, and immediate adjacency to the Historic Courthouse Square and related desirability, the inherent value of this site as a housing opportunity site is extremely high. As such, the existing uses are not seen to have a substantial impact on potential residential development. The City will maintain coordination and continue discussions with the County to reiterate the City s intent regarding this site, and to facilitate new housing development here during the planning period. Site Downtown 9 is located on Broadway in the heart of Redwood City, next to Courthouse Square. Comprised of two parcels, the current structure was built in the 1960s and contains a bank. The property is owned by a local family that has voiced interest in redevelopment of the property with residential uses. Developers have also approached property owners regarding redevelopment. The site provides opportunities for development of an estimated 100 new units. Downtown 10 Site Downtown 10 is located on Broadway. The site is occupied by a bank and extensive surface parking. There is also a street and a traffic circle owned by Redwood City included in this site, which increase the overall area by almost 50 percent. The structure on the site is 35 years old, and the majority of the site is devoted to surface parking. Local developers have approached the bank and the City regarding redevelopment. The site provides opportunities for development of an estimated 200 new residential units. Downtown 11 Site Downtown 11 is located on Walnut and is comprised of two parcels. One parcel is vacant; the other is occupied by a light industrial/warehouse building. The property was recently purchased by a local developer with experience in residential development in Downtown Redwood City. City staff estimates that 60 units would be proposed on this site, given development proposals received on similar sites in Downtown. Mixed Use Sites In addition to the sites identified in Downtown, multiple opportunities exist for infill development in Redwood City in areas designated for Mixed Use by the General. Implementing zoning was adopted in Redwood City General Page B-9

2012 for the Mixed Use - Corridor and Mixed Use - Neighborhood land use designations. Within these zones, six sites were identified as the most appropriate locations for new housing development (Table AB1-3). The potential for creation of residential units along major transit corridors is predicated on interest from developers, and will be encouraged by the success of recent projects Downtown and along other corridors, including projects such as Woodside Villas, Franklin Street Apartments, Villa Montgomery, The Lane on the Boulevard, Township Apartments, and Radius Apartments. With revisions to the Built Environment Element in 2009 allowing increased densities of up to 60 units per acre along these corridors, the feasibility of projects is substantially increased. Table AB1-2: Mixed Use Opportunity Sites Area General Zoning Maximum Residential Density Acres Parcels Existing Housing Units Potential Housing Units Affordability Level Site A Mixed Use - Corridor P (N. Main) 74 du/ac 3.14 3 0 209 Lower Site B Mixed Use - Corridor MU - RC 60 du/ac 8.46 2 0 456 Lower Site C Mixed Use - Corridor MU - VB 60 du/ac 2.52 1 0 136 Lower Site D Mixed Use - Corridor MU - GB 60 du/ac 9.57 1 0 516 Lower Site E Mixed Use - Corridor MU - GB 60 du/ac 12.17 8 0 657 Lower Site F Mixed Use - Neighborhood/ Residential - High MUN & R-4-T 40 du/ac 1.96 2 0 70 Lower Total 39.93 2,044 Site A (North Main Precise ) Given its close proximity to the Downtown, the North Main Street Precise is intended to create a physical link between Downtown and the bayfront via a potential U.S. 101 crossing. This plan, encompassing 9.5 acres and located just beyond Downtown, establishes a plan for redevelopment of existing commercial uses with up to 438 residential units and, to a lesser degree, commercial uses. Pedestrianand bicycle-oriented access improvements are planned to create bayfront connections to the Downtown core. In 2014, one project within this Precise had completed construction (Township Apartments at 333 Main Street), providing 115 market-rate and 17 moderate-income units. Three remaining parcels in the Precise present the greatest potential for redevelopment (see Site A in the Sites Inventory tables and map). Together, these three adjacent parcels have the potential to yield an estimated 209 total units based on densities Page B-10 Redwood City General

allowed in the Precise (74 units per acre), and using a conservative estimate of 90 percent of development capacity. Given allowable densities, these units are counted toward the lower-income RHNA, consistent with State law. Site B Site B consists of two large parcels under common ownership, totaling nearly 8.5 acres. These parcels are located on Redwood Creek, providing excellent potential for development due to the creek front amenity. In addition, this site is located directly across the creek from the North Main Precise and Township Apartments catalyst project. There is developer interest in redevelopment of the properties in Site B, likely as a phased development. The property that fronts on Veterans Boulevard is occupied by a collection of smaller retail uses that have experienced a number of vacancies over time. Existing uses include small restaurants and discount retailers. This property has extensive creek frontage that would likely redevelop first. The northern parcel is occupied by an aging commercial center built in the 1960s. Current tenants include Toys R Us and Babies R Us, Big 5, and Footlocker. Between these two properties is another parcel occupied by a Kohl s department store. Because Kohl s was recently introduced to this space, it is unlikely that this parcel will develop during the Housing Element planning period and was therefore omitted from this site. The site provides opportunities for development of an estimated 456 new residential units. Site C Site C is a large single parcel (2.52 acres) occupied by a Kmart center. The building is dated; the use is operational but has struggled as a commercial venue. The site provides opportunities for development of an estimated 136 new residential units. Site D Site D is owned by Redwood City and functions as the City s corporation yard for storage of vehicles and equipment on 9.57 acres. This site is a prime locale, at the intersection of Broadway and Woodside, with high visibility to residents and visitors. The structures on the property were constructed approximately 40 years ago. The City is actively seeking relocation of the corporation yard, and is interested in redeveloping the site with mixed and residential uses. The site provides opportunities for development of an estimated 516 new residential units. Site E Site E is also located on Woodside Road at Broadway. This site is one of the first things a visitor to Redwood City sees as they enter Redwood City from the 101 off-ramp. This site, which could serve as an iconic Redwood City General Page B-11

gateway to Redwood City and the Downtown area, is occupied by a strip commercial mall containing Big Lots, Denny's, Jack in the Box, CVS, and Foods Co. The buildings were built in the 1960s and are aging. There is extensive surface parking on this large site (more than 12 acres). There have been multiple inquiries about redeveloping this prime site near Redwood City s Downtown, and assembly by the property owners has been discussed. The site provides opportunities for development of an estimated 657 new residential units. The site is located across from the City s corporation yard, which is also included in this Housing Element as an opportunity site (Site D). Potential for a coordinated development between these two properties exists. Site F Site F is comprised of two parcels with a common owner, and is currently occupied by a motel. The motel is in operation; however, a history of developer interest in this site demonstrates its potential. Despite some improvements in recent years, including a new breakfast area for the motel, this site remains a viable opportunity site given its location along El Camino Real, allowable density, and proximity to other catalyst projects, including The Lane on the Boulevard Apartments and an assisted living facility, both approximately one block from Site F. Site F provides opportunities for development of an estimated 70 new residential units using a conservative estimate of 90 percent of development capacity. Given allowable densities, these units are counted toward the lowerincome RHNA, consistent with State law. Page B-12 Redwood City General