STAFF REPORT TO THE MAYOR & COUNCIL Mollie Bogle, Planner November 12, 2018

Similar documents
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT BOJNANGLES SIGN VARIANCES

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PREMIER AUTO SERVICES, INC. VARIANCES

VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008

CITY OF CASCADE LOCKS PLANNING COMMISSION ORDER VARIANCE WINDSONG TERRACE LLC

STAFF REPORT VARIANCE FROM LDC CHAPTER 17, SECTION 15(d)(1)(a) CASE NO

Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, February 15, 2016

Tyrone Planning Commission Agenda

TO: Glynn County Board of Appeals. Eric Lee Johnson, Planning Division Manager. ZV Ocean Road. DATE: February 3, 2015

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE FORT DODGE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER OCTOBER 3, 2017

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

Ravenna Township. Dakota County, Minnesota. Variance Application. Please Print or Type All Information

VA R I TEM #3

5. This variance is not the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel of land, building or structure;

Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions:

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

RED LOBSTER GROUND SIGN 450 S. ORANGE AVE.

Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, January 11, 2016

TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS APRIL 25, 2016 MINUTES

A G E N D A. Administrative Review Board City Council Chambers 800 Municipal Drive, Farmington, NM February 9, 2017 at 6:00 p.m.

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT VARIANCE AND WAIVER THE ROSALYNN APARTMENTS

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA

Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, June 13, 2016

MINUTE ORDER. BONNER COUNTY PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES NOVEMBER 5, 2015

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH

Department of Municipal Licenses and Inspections Zoning Board of Appeals 90 Pond Street Braintree, Massachusetts 02184

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, PANEL A PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES DALLAS CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, JANUARY 17, 2017

June 21, 2018 Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission (PLDRC)

CERTIFICATE OF POSTING

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

Georgetown Planning Department

1017 S. MILLS AVE. DRIVEWAY

MEETING MINUTES January 26, 2015

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

AGENDA. Grand Haven Charter Township Zoning Board of Appeals Tuesday, March 22, :00 pm

STREAM BUFFER VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET

1. Applicants, Michael and Mary Phillips are the owners of a property located

required findings for approval of the variance cannot be made

Paw Paw Township Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes May 16, 2018

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

SARPY COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES OF MEETING May 14, 2015

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT MCDONALD S ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT VARIANCES

St. James Catholic Church USPS. St. Luke Episcopal. O.C. Regional History. Heritage Square

VENUE 578 ROOFTOP SIGN 578 N. ORANGE AVE.

AGENDA. 2. Review of Agenda by the Board and Addition of items of New Business to the Agenda for Consideration by the Board

LOT SPLITS & LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS/COMBINATIONS APPLICATION

CONDITIONAL USE/ VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION

Spartanburg County Planning and Development Department

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, PANEL A PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES DALLAS CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, APRIL 21, 2015

KETCHUM PLANNING AND ZONING

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA

CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE TO APPLICANTS

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

Spence Carport Variance

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development

Finnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback

Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, November 9, 2015

Planning and Zoning Commission

Staff Report. Variance

CITY OF INDIAN ROCKS BEACH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS

MINUTE ORDER. BONNER COUNTY PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES APRIL 7, 2016

STAFF REPORT. R-PUD (Residential Planned Unit Development) District

MEETING AGENDA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

STAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting date: May 11, 2016 Item: VN Prepared by: Marc Jordan

Project Information. Request. Required Attachments

ORDINANCE NO

STAFF REPORT #

ZONING VARIANCES ADMINISTRATIVE

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BRIEFING For Meeting Scheduled for December 15, 2010 Agenda Item C2

NEW BUSINESS. Case #8-1. Existing & Proposed Conditions. Other Permits/Approvals Required

TOWN OF LANTANA. Preserving Lantana s small town atmosphere through responsible government and quality service. SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION INFORMATION

APPENDIX E FORMS INDEX OF ZONING FORMS

APPLICATION FOR EXEMPT SUBDIVISION: NON-LOT SPLIT

CITY COMMISSION REPORT (and Planning Board Report) For Meeting Scheduled for November 7, 2013 Vested Rights Special Permit Resolution

CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO

Rapid City Planning Commission


Rapid City Planning Commission Planned Development Project Report

2018 Board of Adjustment Meeting Schedule Meetings are held the 3 rd Wednesday of the month at 5:00pm. May Jul

1 August 12, 2015 Public Hearing

Finnerty, Shawn & Lori Water Front Setback

PARISH OF ASCENSION OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT. Zoning Meeting

PLNSUB Meridian Commerce Center Subdivision Amendment & PLNPCM Meridian Commerce Center Street Closure

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING)

Board of Adjustment Variance Process Guide

CITY OF MONTROSE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA City Council Chambers, 107 S Cascade Ave., Montrose, Colorado 5:00 p.m.

Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 7 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 6/7/2007

In Hopkinton on the sixteenth day of March, 2017 A.D. the said meeting was

City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Members Ferrell, Gerblick, Ghannam, Gronachan, Ibe and Sanghvi

VARIANCE APPLICATION

WEISENBERG TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA

OASIS LIQUOR ALCOHOL SALES

PETITION FOR VARIANCE. Village Hall Glen Carbon, IL (Do not write in this space-for Office Use Only) Notice Published On: Parcel I.D. No.

MINUTES. May 1, Chairman Smith called the City Plan Commission Meeting to order at 7 p.m.in the City Council Chambers.

Transcription:

(Page 1) 2017.019.VAR STAFF REPORT TO THE MAYOR & COUNCIL Mollie Bogle, Planner November 12, 2018 APPLICATION INFORMATION Parcel Identification Number: M02 037 [Tract A and B] Physical Address: 944 Pearl Street Applicant / Owner: Leon Peters Zoning Action Requested: Variance Campaign Contributions: None filed Conflict of Interest: None filed INTRODUCTION The Applicant requests minimum lot area variances from Section 700.1 at 944 Pearl Street (M02 037) [Tract A and B] [ATTACHMENT A]. The Applicant requests (A) a variance to reduce the minimum lot area of Tract A from 0.25 acres to 0.21 acres, a variance of 0.04 acres; and (B) a variance to reduce the minimum lot area of Tract B from 0.25 acres to 0.17 acres, a variance of 0.08 acres [ATTACHMENT B]. No public comment has been filed as of the date of this report. ZONING HISTORY The Property was zoned Small Lot Residential District (R4) in 2005. CITY OF MADISON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING October 18, 2018 Motion by Houston to recommend denial of the dimensional requirement variances from Section 700.1 at 944 Pearl Street (M02 037) [Tract A and B] based on the application, public hearing, and discussion, and considering applicable standards, due to the following reasoning(s), finding(s), and/or conclusion(s): approval of variances to create nonconforming lots of record at the point of subdivision undermines the ability to enforce said requirements in any zoning district; seconded by Smock; vote to approve the motion unanimous (2-0; Anderson, Nolan-Kuperbeg, and Wall absent; Terrell-Alexander recused). STANDARDS FOR VARIANCE APPLICATION DECISIONS (SECTION 1130.6) Standards (1) there are extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the property because of size, shape, or topography; (2) the literal application of this Ordinance would create an unnecessary hardship; (3) variance would not cause substantial detriment to public good or impair the purposes or intent of this Ordinance; Staff Comments According to the Applicant, The existing tract of land has a greater lot area than many of the surrounding developed lots in the area Nevertheless, it does not appear there are extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the property because of size, shape, or topography. However, as sufficient evidence has not been provided by the Applicant to support their claim, Staff cannot provide a definitive assessment. According to the Applicant, It is not considered economical feasible to build a single dwelling on this larger track of land as it exists Nevertheless, it does not appear the literal application of this Ordinance would create an unnecessary hardship. However, as sufficient evidence has not been provided by the Applicant to support their claim, Staff cannot provide a definitive assessment. It does appear this variance would cause substantial detriment to public good and severely impair the purposes or intent of this Ordinance by creating a precedent of allowing the creation of nonconforming lots of record at the point of subdivision. Mayor and Council denied a similar request earlier this year (Edward Good on behalf of Friesen Real Estate

(Page 2) 2017.019.VAR (4) a variance will not confer upon the property of the applicant any special privilege denied to other properties in the district; (5) the special circumstances surrounding the request for the variance are not the result of acts by the applicant; (6) the zoning proposal is consistent with the construction and design standards and design criteria adopted by the City of Madison; and, (7) the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible an economically viable use of the land, building, or structure. Holdings, LLC at 622 Foster Street (M20 081) and 498 S. Main Street (M20 071)). It does appear this variance may confer upon the property of the applicant a special privilege denied to other properties in the zoning district. No other property owner may create nonconforming lots of record at the point of subdivision. See Staff comment to Section 1130.6 (3) above. It does appear the special circumstances surrounding the request for the variance are the result of acts by the applicant. The property is a developed with a single-family residential dwelling. N/A N/A SUMMARY Staff advises that any motion to: APPROVE the dimensional requirement variances from Section 700.1 at 944 Pearl Street (M02 037) [Tract A and B] based on the application, public hearing, and discussion, and considering applicable standards, with the following condition(s), clarification(s), and/or changes(s): DENY the dimensional requirement variances from Section 700.1 at 944 Pearl Street (M02 037) [Tract A and B] based on the application, public hearing, and discussion, and considering applicable standards, due to the following reasoning(s), finding(s), and/or conclusion(s): 1. 1. approval of variances to create nonconforming lots of OTHER ACTION(S): record at the point of subdivision undermines the ability to enforce said requirements in any zoning district. City of Madison Main Street & Planning Department Mollie Bogle, Planner 132 N. Main Street P.O. Box 32 Madison, GA 30650 (706) 342-1251 x224 mbogle@madisonga.com All materials submitted by the applicant are available at City Hall or online at http://www.madisonga.com/zoning. Staff will have copies of these materials at all public hearings.

(Page 3) Morgan County, GA ATTACHMENT A Overview Legend Parcels Roads 106 ft Parcel ID M02 037 Class Code Residential Taxing District MADISON MADISON Acres 0.43 (Note: Not to be used on legal documents) Owner PETERS LEON & PAT PETERS 2691 OLD BUCKHEAD ROAD MADISON GA 30650 Physical Address 944 PEARL ST Assessed Value Value $44514 Last 2 Sales Date Price Reason Qual 9/10/2008 $28000 N9 U 5/18/2007 0 ND U Date created: 10/11/2018 Last Data Uploaded: 10/11/2018 7:08:59 AM Developed by

(Page 4) ATTACHMENT B

(Page 5)

(Page 6) Variance Request: 944 Pearl Street, Madison, Georgia 30650 Applicant s Name: Leon Peters and Pat Peters Owners Address: 2691 Old Buckhead Road, Madison Georgia 30650 Address of Subject Property: 944 Pearl Street, Madison, Georgia 30650 1) Registered land Survey/Site plan submitted indicating the proposed buildable area of each proposed lot after all applicable required setbacks are applied. 2) The subject property is adjacent to and surrounded by single family homes developed on small lots on each side and rear. 3) The minimum lot size for a single-family development in a R-4 zoning district is.25% of an acre (10, 890 sq. ft.) per the 2011 Madison Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 90, Section 700.1. The subject lot is currently.38% of an acre located on the corner of Pearl street and Mapp street in Madison, Georgia. It is our request to reduce the required lot area from the required.25% of an acre to the following proposed lot areas in order to subdivide the existing lot into two lots. The variance request is to allow a lot area of.21% (9,148 sq. ft.) of an acre fronting on Pearl Street and the other lot will have a lot area of.17% (7,405 sq. ft.) of an acre fronting on Mapp Street. 4) The existing tract of land has a greater lot area than many of the surrounding developed lots in the area and it is our desire to subdivide our lot and build a single-family dwelling on each lot. It is moreover economical viable to subdivide the lot into two lots for the following reasons: It would strengthen the city economic base. Protect residential investments and promote sustained stability of the residential area. Ensure the appearance and effects of residential buildings and uses which are consistent with the character of the area while providing off street parking and ample yard space. 5) It is not considered economical feasible to build a single dwelling on this larger track of land as it exists and leave an open space of blight on the neighborhood. The proposed smaller lot will be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood since this is an older neighborhood which is currently thriving to provide affordable housing and an increase in property valuations.

(Page 7)