North Shore, Grand Tracadie, Pleasant Grove Amalgamation Review. February 2018

Transcription

1 North Shore, Grand Tracadie, Pleasant Grove Amalgamation Review February 2018

2 Executive Summary 2 Community Overview 3 North Shore 3 Grand Tracadie 3 Pleasant Grove 3 Tax Rates and Assessments 4 Gas Tax Funding 5 Land Area 5 Properties 6 Populations 6 Council Structures and Staffing 7 Financial Positions and Assets 8 Shared Services 9 North Shore Fire District 9 Provincial Electoral District - 9 School District 9 SWOT 10 Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats 10 Process - Amalgamation 11 North Shore, Grand Tracadie and Pleasant Grove as one Rural Municipality 13 Financials 13 Assets 13 Services 13 Tax Rates 14 Election s 15 Wards or no Wards 15 Council Size 15 Committee Structure 15 1

3 Executive Summary With the recent proclamation of the New Municipalities Act, over the next five years Rural Municipalities will have to become complaint with the Act. This means implementing a number of By-Laws and providing certain services to their residents. Over the next year the Rural Municipality will adopt a number of By-Laws to come into compliance with the act but in general meets the criteria of the new act with the services and reporting that North Shore already has in place. The Communities of Grand Tracadie and Pleasant Grove do not meet the criteria that will be required of them over the next few years. These Communities approached North Shore about the possibility of Amalgamation with North Shore. At the request of the Council of the North Shore this document has been prepared by a Committee of Council to review Amalgamation. This report will review current structures, finances and statistics of the three municipalities, highlight the process of Amalgamation. Review the strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats of amalgamation and what the communities would look like as one Rural Municipality. The body of the report highlights the detail of the information on the Communities and more detail can be reviewed within the referenced appendixes of the document. 2

4 Community Overview North Shore The Rural Municipality of North Shore brings together West Covehead, Covehead Road and Stanhope, with historical roots going back two centuries and more. Founded on rich traditions of community organization, institution building, neighborliness and industry, the Community identifies with its productive land and sea resources and coastal setting and takes pride in its welcoming nature and hospitality. Situated between the PEI National Park and the Municipality of York to the North and East of Charlottetown, the Community has increasingly become a "bedroom community" for workers who commute to Charlottetown as well as a summer haven for Islanders and non-islanders alike. Grand Tracadie The Community of Grand Tracadie was incorporated in 1984 and is located in Queens County in the central portion of Prince Edward Island, east of Charlottetown. It has a population of 293 residents and is primary a fishing and farming community. The Community has many assets to be proud of including the Community Centre which was formerly the Grand Tracadie School, Community Park which includes standard size fenced in Ball field, outdoor rink (paved area), 1km of paved walking trail and a community playground close by. Pleasant Grove Pleasand Grove borders on North Shore and Grand Tracadie and is a "Bedroom Community". 3

5 Tax Rates and Assessments Grand Tracadie Tax Assessment Residential - 27,963,000 Commercial - 1,742,400 Tax Rates Residential -.17 Commercial -.28 Tax Revenue Residential - $47,537 Commercial - $4,878 Pleasant Grove Tax Assessment Residential - 30,583,700 Commercial - 475,300 Tax Rates Residential -.08 Commercial -.08 Tax Revenue Residential/ Commercial - $24,847 North Shore Tax Assessment Residential - 176,538,192 Commercial - 4,153,900 Tax Rates Residential -.18 Commercial -.18 Tax Revenue 4

6 Residential - $317,768 Commercial - $7,477 ** Each Community pays the North Shore Fire Company.08 cents per hundred of assessment Gas Tax Funding For the Period the Communities had the following allocation, the allocations for the period are yet to be determined be should at least match the prior period North Shore $138,382 Pleasant Grove $61,724 Grand Tracadie $36,462 Land Area North Shore Grand Tracadie Pleasant Grove 11,230 Acres 3,009 Acres 3,354 Acres Combined 17,593 Acres 5

7 Properties North Shore 1,555 Grand Tracadie 472 Pleasant Grove 393 Combined 2,420 Populations North Shore 1,112 Grand Tracadie 293 Pleasant Grove 496 Combined 1,901 *Populations numbers from the 2012/2013 Municipal Statistical Review - PEI Dept of Finance 6

8 Council Structures and Staffing North Shore currently has a Council consisting of 12 Councilors and a Mayor. The Councilors were elected under the ward system which includes the wards of Stanhope, West Covehead and Covehead Road. North Shore has three part-time staff, an Administrator position that is 30 hours per week, a Recreation and Events position that is 15 hours per week and a Custodian position that is 6 hours per week with additional hours as required. A summer student funded through the province is hired every summer for 8 weeks. There is also a contract bookkeeper that works about 6 hours per month. Grand Tracadie has a Council consisting of 6 Councilors and a Mayor that are elected at large. Grand Tracadie currently does not have an Administrator and typically has a summer student for 8 weeks. Pleasant Grove has a Council with 4 Councilors and a Mayor with 2 vacant seats, there is a volunteer administrator and Councillors were elected at large. 7

9 Financial Positions and Assets The Community of North Shore has two properties the North Shore Community Centre and Stanhope Place. There is no debt owed on either property and ongoing maintenance has both the properties in good shape. At the North Shore Community Centre there is also a playground and soccer fields that are used every summer by the local soccer association the North Shore Sharks. North Shore has a positive balance sheet with approximately $55,000 in cash and another $90,000 in specific reserve funds. Grand Tracadie has two properties the Grand Tracadie Community Centre and the adjacent sports fields, there is no debt on either property with both properties in good condition. As of December 31, 2016 Grand Tracadie had a positive balance Sheet with $42,000 in cash Pleasant Grove does not have any physical assets but has a positive balance sheet at the end of 2016 with $23,000 in cash. (See Appendix A Balance Sheets 2016) 8

10 Shared Services North Shore Fire District The Fire Hall is located at 2030 Covehead Road. The building was renovated in 2004 to allow five trucks to be stored. The design includes a water tank in the ground, which allows multiple quick refills of water trucks even in the event of a power failure. A new meeting area with an exercise room for the firemen was also added. The Fire Department is equipped with two pumpers, two tankers and a Heavy Rescue truck that contains the gear needed by firefighters arriving on a call. The Department has a complement of 25 active members. Residents are reminded to allow fire truck access lanes must be kept trimmed to 12-foot width and 15 foot clearance for height. A fire call involves access by a number of vehicles so a turn around area would also be desirable. The Fire Company provides fire protection to Pleasant Grove, Grand Tracadie, Union Road, York and the former Sherwood Fire District in addition to the North Shore Municipality. The Fire Company receives payments from each municipality from their tax revenues. The current rate is $.08/$100 of assessed value for non-commercial and commercial assessment. The Fire Department is called out under the 911 system. The Fire Department trains on Monday night and can be reached at (902) See Map Appendix B - Fire District Map Provincial Electoral District - Stanhope Marshfield District # 8 The District map was redrawn in 2017 and includes North Shore, Grand Tracadie, Pleasant Grove as well as other surrounding Communities See Map Appendix C - Electoral District Map School District 9

11 All Communities are served by the Charlottetown Rural Family of Schools SWOT Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats Strengths Stronger voice with other levels of government (ie. provincial, federal) Staffing efficiencies Shared services- Fire, Electoral and School Districts Funding Opportunities - combined gas tax, increase planning funding Local control over land use in Grand Tracadie and Pleasant Grove Combined resources for projects and community investment Weaknesses Reduction is representation Additional staffing may be required Potential lack of sense of community being a part of a larger Rural Municipality Opportunities Better community collaboration No replication of offerings Shared administrative costs Threats Resistance to change Tax increases in Pleasant Grove and Grand Tracadie North Shore residents may be concerned about reduced services Possible dissolution of Pleasant Grove and Grand Tracadie without amalgamation- loss of funding for area 10

12 Process - Amalgamation North Shore, Pleasant Grove and Grand Tracadie will all be required to hold public meetings on possible amalgamation. The meetings will give the residents an opportunity to provide feedback on possible amalgamation. Any comments received at the public meeting will be included in the application for amalgamation. The application for Amalgamation will include the following Municipal Transition Plan Financial Plan Municipal Services Plan For Municipalities that do not meet the minimum thresholds of 200 million property assessment and 4,000 residents the application goes to the minister for review. Once the Minister reviews and approves the application the application goes to the Island Regulatory and Review Board. See Appendix D - Restructuring of Rural Municipalities by Amalgamation - Regulations North Shore, Grand Tracadie, and Pleasant Grove do not meet the requirements set out in the Municipalities Act to apply for amalgamation directly to IRAC so the application first goes to the Minister of Communities Land and Environment for review. The Minister will move the application forward to IRAC if the Minister thinks it is in the public interest to do so. Here are the IRAC steps Step 1 - IRAC must provide notice of proposal writing 45 days of receiving it Step 2 - Objections may be submitted in writing to IRAC within 30 days of notice-if mailed it is deemed to be received 10 days after it was sent Step 3 - IRAC may hold a public meeting if an objection is filed- however, it must hold a hearing if the Minister has determined there is significant public interest to do so Step 4 - IRAC submits recommendations report to the Minister within 45 days of the Public hearing, or if no public hear is held within 45 days from the date of filing an objection. At this point the Minister will make recommendations to the Lieutenant Governor in Council and the LGIC approves or denies the application and has six months to do so 11

13 Possible total time from IRAC review is five and a half months See Appendix E - IRAC Restructuring Process 12

14 North Shore, Grand Tracadie and Pleasant Grove as one Rural Municipality Financials See Appendix G -Projected Combined Income Assets North Shore Community Centre, Sports Fields and Playground Stanhope Place Grand Tracadie Community Center, Community Commons and Ball Fields Services Planning -Official Plan and Bylaws, Grand Tracadie and Pleasant Grove would be included in the schedule review of the Official Plan in The Communities would have to be reviewed by a Planner in order to document current land uses and development and subdivision permits issued by the province. The approximate cost to include Grand Tracadie and Pleasant Grove would be about 30,000. In April of 2018 there will be a new funding arrangement with the Province for Communities that have Planning and Development it will be 1.1 cent per hundred of assessment possible funding amount with all three communities as one is approximately $26,000 per year. All three Communities use the fire service provided by the North Shore Fire Company the cost of this service is the same.08 cents per hundred of assessment 13

15 Tax Rates There is flexibility on how the tax rates can be set and it is also up to a Council to determine the required yearly and long term funding of the Municipality to set the tax rate which is done on a yearly basis. To be fair the same tax rate across the Community would be the best option. Grand Tracadie area could reduce their current commercial rate or the other areas could increase the commercial rate. To be in line with North Shore Grand Tracadies areas rate would increase by.01 cents per hundred of assessment. Pleasant Grove current rate only covers the amount that currently goes to the North Shore Fire District which is 8 cents per hundred of Assessment. In order to be in line with the rest of the proposed Rural Municipality the rate could be increased over a 5 year period ass 2 cents per hundred of assessment bring the total amount in line with the rest of the Municipality at 18 cents per hundred of assessment. The increase for the Pleasant Grove area would look like this on a home with a 200,000 Assessment Year 1 - $40 Year 2 - $80 Year 3 - $120 Year 4 - $160 Year 5 - $200 Increase is $40 per year each year total increase at year 5 is $200 14

16 Election s Wards or no Wards Elections and the number of Council Seats must be set out in a By-Law, the option is to have councilors elected at large or to set up a ward system. A ward systems must be drawn up geographically so that areas are represented by equal population with no more than a 10% variance in the number. The former school district ward boundaries will not exist. In order to go with a ward system enumeration of the Community would have to take place before the wards are drawn up. Council Size For the November 2018 Municipal Election Council size will be 6 Councilors and a Mayor as set out in the Act or with a By-Law the option is there to have 8 Councilors and Mayor. Committee Structure Municipalities by By-Law will set up committee structures which can be Committees made up of exclusively Council Members or Council Members and Residents 15

17 Appendix A Community of North Shore Statement of Financial Position As at December 31, $ $ Financial assets Cash 35,552 14,082 Guaranteed investment certificates 55,515 15,415 Accounts receivable 26,899 41,819 Restricted cash - green space and recreation fund 25,153 25,153 Total financial assets 143,119 96,469 Liabilities Demand loan (note 2) - 24,263 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 3) 15,496 32,747 Deferred revenue - promenade - 9,478 Deferred revenue - green space and recreation 25,083 25,083 Deferred revenue - official plan 1,022 1,022 Deferred revenue - infrastructure funding 26,612-68,213 92,593 Net assets 74,906 3,876 Non-financial assets Tangible capital assets (Schedule 1) 1,055,809 1,089,391 Prepaid expenses 8,124 8,124 Inventory 574 2,015 Accumulated surplus 1,139,413 1,103,406 Approved by the Council Councillor Councillor (2)

18 Community of North Shore Statement of Accumulated Surplus For the year ended December 31, $ $ Accumulated surplus - Beginning of year 1,103, ,311 Annual surplus for the year 36, ,095 Accumulated surplus - End of year 1,139,413 1,103,406 (3)

19 Community of Grand Tracadie Statements of Changes in Net Financial Assets (Unaudited) For the year ended December 31, 2016 Actual Actual $ $ Excess revenue (expenses) for the year (203) 58,165 Purchase of tangible capital assets (5,616) (107,259) Amortization of tangible capital assets 9,639 9,077 Change in prepaid expenses (105) (119) Decrease (increase) in net financial assets 3,715 (40,136) Net financial assets - Beginning of year 29,354 69,490 Net financial assets - End of year 33,069 29,354 (4)

20 Community of Grand Tracadie Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited) For the year ended December 31, $ $ Cash provided by (used in) Operating activities Annual surplus (deficit) for the year (203) 58,165 Item not affecting cash Amortization 9,639 9,077 9,436 67,242 Net change in non-cash working capital items Decrease (increase) in HST receivable 3,890 (1,239) Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 9,363 (13) Decrease in deferred revenue - (21,800) Increase in prepaid expenses (105) (119) 13,148 (23,171) 22,584 44,071 Investing activity Purchase of tangible capital assets (5,616) (107,259) Increase (decrease) in cash 16,968 (63,188) Cash - Beginning of year 25,095 88,283 Cash - End of year 42,063 25,095 (5)

21 Pleasant Grove ( 2530 ) Financial Statement 2016 Income Items 2016 Budgeted 2016 Actual 2017 Budgeted Property Tax 24, , , Annual Grant Bank Interest Total 30, , , Expenses Items 2016 Budgeted 2016 Actual 2017 Budgeted Fire Dues 24, , , Bank Charges Annual Meeting Ad Canada Day Donation to NSFC , , Total 25, Bank balance as of December 31, $23,777.56

22 CHURCH RD - RTE 243 MILLBORO RD - RTE 243 SUNRISE DR RENEE DR CHURCH RD - RTE 243 STEAD RD MILLBORO RD - RTE 226 LUKE ST ARCADIA LN CYMBRIA WHEATLEY RIVER DUMP RD CAMERON LN MACPHERSON LN ART FORD CROSS RD CROOKED CREEK RD - RTE 251 UNDEFINED UNDEFINED Appendix B NEW GLASGOW RD - RTE 224 PARKER CROSS RD CAMP RD RTE 6 RUSTICO BAY TERRI LN OYSTER BED LILLIAN DR RUSTICO RD - RTE 7 SHORE FIELD LN SUNSET DR LING RD HUMPHREY LN PINE ST PORTAGE RD - RTE 6 APPLE TREE RD LUPIN LN MACQUARRIE RD OSPREY PL BRITAIN SHORE RD BRACKLEY BEACH VICTORY LN GULF SHORE PY BLACK RIVER RD - RTE 6 EAGLES PATH BAYSHORE RD - RTE 25 ROSS LN MACINNIS RD GUERNEY RD NORMANDY LN KENTYRE RD - RTE 250 KILKENNY RD - RTE 250 RILEY LN SUNSET CR MACMILLAN POINT RD SERENITY LN HARRINGTON EBENEZER N O R T H S H O R E F I R E C O V E R A G E A R E A BRUCE LN MACLAUCHLAN RD - RTE 252 MACMILLAN LN OLD SAM RD COVEHEAD BAY UNDEFINED WEST COVEHEAD RD JUSTIN CRT HARDY MILL RD - RTE 220 BAGNALL LN PARKVIEW LN STANHOPE LN ELLIS LN STANHOPE LN STANHOPE COVEHEAD RTE 25 EASTERN RD - RTE 6 FRISTON RD - RTE 222 PLEASANT GROVE RD - RTE 220 DALVAY CR SUFFOLK RD - RTE 222 UNDEFINED WINTER RD UNDEFINED GOLDEN LN PLEASANT GROVE WINTER RIVER CIR EAST SUFFOLK RD EXT ALFRED LN WATTS RD PETERS CR HIGH RD MAC LN BALD EAGLE LN UNDEFINED HARBOUR RD GRAND TRACADIE MILLCOVE RD - RTE 229 KATELYNS WY WHITE SICKLE DR NORTH WINSLOE MILLCOVE COVEHEAD ROAD RTE 6 RTE 6 GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE BLOOMING POINT DALVAY QUEENS POINT RD FOX LN DONALDSTON RD - RTE 219 DOUGAN RD - RTE 229 GARDEN LN CENTER LN IRIS CRT TRACADIE BAY SUFFOLK TENMILE HOUSE NORTH MILTON UNION ROAD CORRIGAN RD LOWE LN BLOOMING POINT RD - RTE 218 DONNIES LN CHARLOTTES SHORE LN STATION RD BROOKFIELD COLVILLE RD - RTE 9 SPRINGVALE HAMPSHIRE TINNEY RD RTE 225 LOYALIST RD - RTE 256 CRABBE RD - RTE 256 RTE 2 MOLYNEAUX RD WARREN GROVE KINGSTON NORTH YORK RIVER RD - RTE 248 MILL RD MILTON STATION MACKENZIE RD - RTE 256 SLEEPY HOLLOW RD WINSLOE RD - RTE 223 LOWER MALPEQUE RD - RTE 236 DAWN DR HURRY RD ROYALTY RD UPTON RD MALPEQUE RD LYNE AV FOURTH ST LOWER MALPEQUE RD BRACKLEY POINT RD - RTE 15 SOUTH WINSLOE YORK BRACKLEY ROYALTY JUNCTION RD PENNY LN SHERWOOD RD CHARLOTTETOWN UNION RD - RTE 221 AVIATION ST BRACKLEY POINT RD MACALEER DR CHARLOTTETOWN PERIMETER HWY IRWIN DR COBIRT DR ASH DR OAK DR NORWOOD RD EAST ROYALTY RD PARENT ST ANGUS DR MACRAE DR ST PETERS RD MACWILLIAMS RD LING DR GRANT ST BRIDLE PATH LN HEARTZ RD MACCALLUM RD HERITAGE LN LINDEN RD LOWER MARSHFIELD RD ST PETERS RD - RTE 2 JENKINS RD MARSHFIELD DUNSTAFFNAGE VICKERSON RD - RTE 222 BUELL RD UNDEFINED SUNSET LN BRUCES LN FRENCHFORT GILL RD MCKENNA RD RED POINT RD FRENCHFORT RD - RTE 260 BLEU JAY DR CAMPBELL RD HILLSBOROUGH (EAST) RIVER DOUGAN LN HALMANS RD FORT AUGUSTUS RD - RTE 21 GLENFINNAN POINT RD BATTERY RD MURNAGHAN RD PORTAGE RD GLENFINNAN DONAGH MERMAID JOHNSTONS RIVER TALLY RD

23 Appendix C

24 Appendix D PART 5 Standards and criteria FOR RURAL MUNICIPALITIES Section 15 Principles, Standards and Criteria Regulations (a) (b) (c) the area proposed to be annexed has been identified as suitable and required for the provision of municipal services, infrastructure or facilities; the purpose of the proposal is to correct a property line; or the municipality has initiated the proposal following a request from the owners of one or more of the properties in the area to be annexed. (EC750/17) PART 5 STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR RURAL MUNICIPALITIES 15. Restructuring of rural municipalities by amalgamation Where a proposal referred to in section 2 for the restructuring of the boundaries of two or more rural municipalities by amalgamation will not result in a municipality that meets the requirements of subsection 13(1) of the Act, the Commission shall consider in evaluating the proposal, in addition to the factors referred to in subsection 19(2) of the Act and the principles referred to in section 2, whether the proposal (a) has been approved by the Minister pursuant to subsection 15(3) of the Act; (b) complies with clause 14(b) of the Act or, if not, when the proposed municipality will be in compliance; (c) complies with clause 14(c) of the Act or, if not, when the proposed municipality will be in compliance; (d) complies with section 85 of the Act or, if not, when the proposed municipality will be in compliance; (e) includes a municipal transition plan, which contains but is not limited to measures for the transfer and consolidation of (i) municipal administrations, (ii) municipal services, if any, and (iii) municipally-owned or operated facilities, if any; (f) includes a financial plan that demonstrates the financial viability of the proposed municipality and contains but is not limited to measures for (i) the transfer of municipal assets, if any, (ii) the transfer of municipal debts, if any, and (iii) the transfer of municipal reserve funds, if any; (g) demonstrates a sufficient economic base by particularizing the public and commercial services within the proposed boundaries, including but not limited to (i) health care services, (ii) recreational facilities, (iii) retail establishments, (iv) tourism establishments, and (v) public administration or private sector office uses; (h) demonstrates that the proposed municipality will not hinder another municipality s ability to expand its boundaries or provide services to its residents, taking into consideration factors such as (i) municipal boundary expansion initiatives approved, under consideration, or underway in the other municipality at the time of submission of the proposal, and Page 12 Current to: December 23, 2017 t c

25 Principles, Standards and Criteria Regulations PART 5 Standards and criteria FOR RURAL MUNICIPALITIES Section 16 (i) (ii) existing, approved or planned municipal infrastructure or facilities for provision of services in the other municipality; and contains a plan for the services the proposed municipality intends to provide, including, where there is limited central water or sewer service provided within the boundaries, the plan for water and sewer service within the municipality. (EC750/17) 16. Restructuring of a rural municipality by annexation Where a proposal referred to in section 2 for the restructuring of the boundaries of a rural municipality by annexation of an unincorporated area will not result in a municipality that meets the requirements of subsection 13(1) of the Act, Commission shall consider in evaluating the proposal, in addition to the factors referred to in subsection 19(2) of the Act and the principles referred to in section 2, (a) the factors referred to in clauses 15(a) to (i); (b) whether the proposal (i) identifies and accounts for physical, environmental, social and economic factors such as (A) physical features, (B) environmental conditions, (C) community establishments, including but not limited to community facilities, institutional uses and public administration offices, and (D) non-residential land uses and the economic base, (ii) includes a process to engage the residents of the proposed municipality in the planning of the future use of the land in the unincorporated area proposed for annexation (iii) demonstrates in the financial plan referred to in clause 15(f) that the annexation is likely to enhance the expanded municipality s ability to provide services, including information respecting (A) the additional costs of administering the unincorporated area and the expected source of funds to pay the additional costs, (B) the effect of administering the unincorporated area on the financial viability of the proposed municipality, (C) where an expansion of municipal services to the unincorporated area is proposed, a service delivery plan that identifies and addresses the cost, timing and phasing of the services to be provided, and (D) where an expansion of municipal services to the unincorporated area is not proposed, the reasons why an expansion of municipal services is not warranted, (iv) demonstrates the value of the annexation to residents within the boundaries proposed, by including a statement of community benefits, which contains but is not limited to (A) the rationale for the boundaries proposed, which considers the location and use of public and commercial services such as health care services, recreational facilities, retail establishments, tourism establishments and public administration or private sector uses, (B) shared needs and common interests that the annexation supports, (C) immediate and expected long-term benefits to residents of the existing municipality, and c t Current to: December 23, 2017 Page 13

26 Appendix E

27 North Shore, Grand Tracadie and Pleasant Grove Boundaries Combined Appendix F Grand Tracadie North Shore Pleasant Grove Miltonvale Park Union Road York Brackley Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Map Legend Data Sources: Municipal Boundaries Layer (Department of Finance), ESRI Topographic Base Layer North Shore, Grand Tracadie and Pleasant Grove Other Municipal Boundaries Kilometers 4 This map is for information purposes only. It is not intended for legal description or calculating exact land dimensions. Municipal Affairs and Provincial Planning Department of Communities, Land and Environment

28 Combined projected income for North Shore, Pleasant Grove and Grand Tracadie month period Projected Budget North Shore Pleasant Grove Grand Tracadie Combined Revenue Property Tax $329,063 $24,847 $52,415 $406,325 Planning $6, $6,000 Rentals $38,450 0 $7,250 $45,700 Funding $21,200 0 $3,300 $24,500 Other $1, $1,150 Totals $398,863 $24,847 $62,965 $486,675 Expenses Municipal Government Administration $114,600 0 $14,900 $129,500 Planning $22, $22,600 Water & Wastewater $2, $2,500 EMO $2, $2,200 Facilities and Property $80,626 0 $13,000 $93,626 Recreation $12,500 0 $3,840 $17,340 Fire Dues $146,250 $24,847 $23,764 $194,771 Total $252,612 $24,847 $55,504 $332,963 Surplus/Deficit $17,586 0 $7,461 $25,047