RPPTL White Paper on Proposed Beach Access Legislation CS/HB 527
|
|
- Irma Higgins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 I. SUMMARY RPPTL White Paper on Proposed Beach Access Legislation CS/HB 527 The Section supports substantial revision to proposed legislation (CS/HB 527/SB 488) or any similar or companion bills or legislation which amends portions of Ch. 161, Florida Statutes, to provide that the Erosion Control Line (ECL), where established, or the mean high water line, is the sole line of demarcation between private and public ownership; which further provides for public access to public beaches and prohibits blocking or asserting private rights in what may or may not be public beaches and accessways. II. CURRENT SITUATION 1. Ownership Boundaries on Public Waterbodies. The common law provides that an upland owner abutting tidal waters owns to the Mean High Water Line (MHWL) of the abutting tidal water body. Chapter 161, Florida Statutes, already provides that after a beach restoration, the ECL is intended as the line of demarcation between private ownership and public ownership. Immediately prior to the beach restoration, the ECL is to be established at the then MHWL. In the recent and controversial decision, Walton County v. Stop the Beach Renourishment, 2008 WL (Fla. 2008), a case in which the ECL was established at the MHWL, the Florida Supreme Court upheld the Ch. 161 designation of the ECL as a public/private ownership boundary. However, there are instances in which the private owners own waterward of the MHWL, whether or not an ECL has been established. Those instances may include, without limitation, Spanish Land Grants; instances where an upland owner acquired the submerged lands from the State of Florida; instances where submerged lands were properly filled under the Butler Act or other legal authorization; judicial determinations of ownership; and legislative grants (such as, the submerged land within the City of Tampa and certain submerged lands in the City of St. Petersburg). In 1991, Attorney General Robert Butterworth published a book enumerating the various laws affecting water and water bodies. A great many of these were private bills granting ownership and other rights in sovereign waters. Laws of Florida Relating to Water and Water Bodies , Office of the FL. Attorney General, Soft Sand Public Rights In a single appellate level case, the court declared that under some circumstances privately owned beach properties could become imbued with public rights and privileges. In City of Daytona Beach v. Tona-Rama, Inc., 294 So.2d 73, 78 (Fla. 1974), the court stated that: [i]f the recreational use of the sandy area adjacent to mean high tide has been ancient, reasonable, without interruption and free from dispute, such use, as a matter of custom, should not be interfered with by the owner. However, the 1
2 owner may make any use of his property which is consistent with such public use and not calculated to interfere with the exercise of the right of the public to enjoy the dry sand area as a recreational adjunct of the wet sand or foreshore area. * * * The general public may continue to use the dry sand area for their usual recreational activities, not because the public has any interest in the land itself, but because of a right gained through custom to use this particular area of the beach as they have without dispute and without interruption for many years. These are sometimes referred to as Soft Sand Public Rights. Until these have been judicially established, neither the existence nor the extent of soft sand public rights are known and are probably unknowable. The most recent court interpretation concluded that the Tona-Rama case did not establish a general customary public use of all Florida beaches, but only sets up a framework for courts to analyze, on a case-by-case basis. Trepanier v. County of Volusia, 965 So.2d 276, (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). As with prescriptive easements discussed in more detail below, Trepanier recognized the presumption that a use is permissive rather than adverse and shifted the burden to the claimant to prove that the public's use was adverse. 3. Prescriptive Easements. Under Florida law, easements and other usage rights can also be acquired by prescription. The law concerning prescriptive easements is set forth in Downing v. Bird, 100 So.2d 57 (Fla.1958). See also Crigger v. Florida Power Corp., 436 So.2d 937 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Like adverse possession, the right to such an easement is acquired only by actual, continuous, uninterrupted use by the claimant for a prescribed period, in this instance twenty years. The use must be adverse and either... with the knowledge of the owner or so open, notorious, and visible that knowledge... is imputed. 100 So.2d at 64. It must be inconsistent with the owner's use and enjoyment, and must not be a permissive use such that the owner has a right to legal action to stop it. Quoting Phelps v. Griffith, 629 So.2d 304, (Fla. 2 nd DCA 1993) If the use of an alleged easement is not exclusive and not inconsistent with the rights of the owner of the land to its use and enjoyment, it is presumed that such use is permissive rather than adverse; the burden is on the claimant to prove that the public's use was adverse. Trepanier v. County of Volusia, 965 So.2d 276 (Fla. 5th DCA, 2007) (in the context of beach access); Dan v. BSJ Realty, LLC, 953 So.2d 640 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Farley v. Hiers, 668 So.2d 248, (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) ( proof required to overcome presumption of permission cannot be established by loose, uncertain testimony which necessitates resort to mere conjecture. ) 2
3 4. Recording Acts. Certainty of land ownership has always been a fundamental principal in Florida Law. One of the core Florida precepts in furtherance of that certainty is that one has an absolute right to rely on record title. This common law notion has been formally codified in Florida Statutes since 1828, see , Fla. Stat. (2008). This Recording Act goes well beyond simply declaring that record title is prima facie evidence of ownership or establishes a presumption. Record title in the hands of a good faith purchaser without notice is an affirmative shield against contrary claims and interests. III. EFFECT OF PROPOSED CHANGES CS/HB 527 attempts to accomplish the following: 1. Declares that any sandy beach below the mean high water line or a recorded erosion control line is public, and a private entity, absent a board of trustees deed or authorization, may not restrict access along the shoreline across such beaches. 2. Restrict any changes to existing beach access by development or construction unless alternative access is provided. 3. Criminalizes the exercise of traditional private property rights to fence, exclude or post no trespassing signs on private property if such property is subject to Soft Sand Public Rights, a prescriptive easement or other public right of use. 4. Restricts the circumstances under which the government may place any fencing, barricade or other obstruction upon a public beach. 5. Absolutely prohibits a governmental entity from limiting the public s access to a public beach unless alternative access which is of substantially similar quality and convenience to the public is provided. 6. Provides that record title ownership is not prima facie evidence that a landowner has the right to exclude the public from areas in which Soft Sand Public Rights have accrued or a prescriptive or other easement has been established. The Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section of the Florida Bar has the following concerns about this bill. 1. The proposed legislation would make a strict line of demarcation between private control and public access at either the MHWL or the ECL. Those lines of demarcation are not uniformly reflective of the extent of private property rights. As discussed above, there are a number of circumstances when private landowners own and have the right to exclude others from lands below the MHWL or ECL. As such, this bill potentially takes vested property rights of landowners who own land waterward of the MHWL or ECL, subjecting the state to expensive litigation and damages. 3
4 2. There is an undeniable right of the public to move laterally along sovereign beaches (generally those areas below the ECL or MHWL, subject to exceptions as discussed above). Unfortunately, the bill goes well beyond a prohibition of barring access along lands which are undeniably state owned and purports to restrict the exercise of traditional property rights to fence, post no trespassing signs and exclude on privately owned lands which have been impressed with Soft Sand Public Rights, a prescriptive easement or other usage rights. Until public rights have been established by a recorded grant or judicially, neither the existence nor the extent of prescriptive easements or soft sand public rights are known or knowable, and since a presumption exists in Florida law that adverse use was permissive it will be a comparatively rare situation in which public rights would actually have vested. To the extent this bill is used by law enforcement personnel to prohibit a landowner from exercising traditional property rights as to lands which are undeniably private property is almost certain to be a compensable taking or to trigger very expensive litigation to factually prove (notwithstanding the presumption) that public rights had somehow vested. To criminalize the exercise of those same private property rights if the landowner happens to guess wrong about whether or not a prescriptive easement or other public right may exist is fundamentally wrong. 3. The proposed legislation also provides for strict maintenance of public accessways to public beaches, and prohibits blocking either public accessways or the public's right to laterally traverse public beaches. However, the legislation does not indicate what might constitute blockage of the public's right to traverse the public beaches, thereby leaving it open to interpretation. One interpretation might be that hotels and resorts or other owners could not create walkways over the sand to the beach areas, and may be precluded from placing cabanas or other articles for use by guests on the beach, as these may be considered to be blocking the public's right to traverse the beach. 4. The bill turns our private property recording system upside down by providing that proof of record title is NOT prima facie evidence that the titleholder has a right to exclude the public. As discussed above, Florida s record title act goes beyond an evidentiary presumption of ownership, to create an affirmative shield against contrary claims and interests. Not only does this create wholly abrogate the recording act, it will necessarily attract constitutional takings claims. Interestingly, by eliminating the presumption of private ownership, it will make trespass convictions all but impossible on beachfront property. Few now recall that one of the sovereignty lands cases leading up to Coastal Petroleum was asserted in the context of a criminal trespass charge. 5. The language of CS/HB 527 drops the one desirable portion of the original bill which would have permitted a landowner to file a notice and allow public access and use of 4
5 their property without fear of liability and without losing their property rights as a result of their public spirited generosity. The absence of that desirable protection, coupled with a clear risk of losing property rights under this bill will lead most counsel to advise their clients to immediately fence and post the full extent of their private property. We suspect that most attorneys would advise in favor of protecting very valuable private property rights even in the face of possible misdemeanor charges (which we would suggest are unsustainable as no reasonable person can know the extent of an as yet undetermined prescriptive easement). 6. Although a subset of the concern about restricting property rights on indeterminate lands, the provision stating development or construction shall not interfere with such right of public access unless a comparable alternative accessway is provided is problematic in requiring (or permitting the extortion of) an affirmative grant of rights in lands where none have been proven to currently exist. There is also an inherent ambiguity of what might be considered a comparable alternative 7. Sandy Beach is not an adequately defined term, but is used throughout the bill. Since the definition of Sovereign Beach is defined as that portion of a sandy beach, does this bill not apply to rocky or muddy beaches? One would hope that to be the case, because if applied to any transition from private to sovereign ownership, the bill can be read to prohibit the construction of private seawalls, rip-rap and other shore protection measures and perhaps the maintenance or replacement of existing shore structures. 8. We note that the proposed new subsection prohibiting certain governmental restraints on beach access (161.82(2)(a)) is phrased in the disjunctive, so that the government can deny access INDEFINITELY to protect sea turtles or when necessary for public health, safety and welfare, and can prohibit access for up to 30 calendar days even if it's not for such purposes (i.e., for purely arbitrary reasons?) (2)(b) would seem to prohibit a governmental entity from completely closing a beach even in response to the most dire of health and safety concerns. IV. FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS The proposed legislation would likely result in costly litigation (for both property owners and the State) over ownership and boundary issues. It may also create costly litigation regarding what constitutes blockage of the public's right to traverse the beach. Many of the owners making use of the beaches are hotels and resorts, which may be restricted on the placement of cabanas and other articles for use by tourists. This could have an adverse effect on tourism and the tax dollars generated by tourists. Additionally, the establishment of new or false boundaries could result in a devaluation of the valuable beachfront properties, as these properties would lose rights, such as the right to accretions, direct beach access, and the right to wharf out to navigability. Such devaluations would result in lower ad valorem tax revenues. V. DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT ON PRIVATE SECTOR 5
6 Owners of beachfront property will likely become embroiled in costly litigation over ownership and boundary issues, as well as issues regarding the abutting owner's use of the beach and the exercise of riparian/littoral and other traditional property rights. VI. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES The proposed legislation appears to be unconstitutional with regard to the taking of private property rights without due process or compensation. V. OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES Florida Land Title Association Hotel and Resort Groups Stop the Beach Renourishment Pacific Legal Foundation and other property rights coalitions Condominium and Homeowners Association Groups # _v1 6
M E M O R A N D U M Florida Legislative Session Bills of Concern CS/HB 631 (Chapter Law ) Customary Use and Beach Access
THOMAS J. TRASK, B.C.S.* JAY DAIGNEAULT RANDY MORA ERICA F. AUGELLO JOHN E. SCHAEFER DAVID E. PLATTE PATRICK E. PEREZ ROBERT M. ESCHENFELDER, B.C.S.* * Board Certified by the Florida Bar in City, County
More informationby Richard J. McLaughlin Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies
by Richard J. McLaughlin Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies Historical context of beach access and rolling easements in Texas Quick review of the Open Beaches Act and relevant judicial
More informationby Richard J. McLaughlin Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
by Richard J. McLaughlin Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Historical context of beach access and rolling easements in Texas Quick review of the Open
More informationAlfred J. Malefatto & Keri Ann C. Baker Lewis, Longman & Walker, P.A. Tyler Chappell The Chappell Group, Inc.
Alfred J. Malefatto & Keri Ann C. Baker Lewis, Longman & Walker, P.A. Tyler Chappell The Chappell Group, Inc. Coastal construction activities are regulated by the State to prevent imprudent construction
More informationCompeting Rights to our Natural Resources and Privileges to the Shore March 30, 2016
Competing Rights to our Natural Resources and Privileges to the Shore March 30, 2016 Prof. Dennis Esposito Director Environmental and Land Use Clinical Externship Program; Adjunct Prof. Marine Affairs
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2004 JAMES J. BENTZ and EILEEN BENTZ, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D03-1898 CARROLL MCDANIEL and MELVENE J. MCDANIEL, ETC.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Appellants, vs. SAVE OUR BEACHES, INC., et al., CASE NUMBER: SC06-1449 Appellees. / AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF FLORIDA SHORE
More informationFlorida Attorney General Advisory Legal Opinion
Number: AGO 2008-44 Date: August 28, 2008 Subject: Homestead Exemption Florida Attorney General Advisory Legal Opinion Mr. Loren E. Levy The Levy Law Firm 1828 Riggins Lane Tallahassee, Florida 32308 RE:
More informationLEGAL AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF INNOVATIVE PLANNING FOR SEA-LEVEL RISE IN THE GULF OF MEXICO FINAL REPORT AND RESEARCH SUMMARY JANUARY 2013
LEGAL AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF INNOVATIVE PLANNING FOR SEA-LEVEL RISE IN THE GULF OF MEXICO FINAL REPORT AND RESEARCH SUMMARY JANUARY 2013 MASGP- 13-002 In February 2010, the Mississippi-Alabama Sea
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 18, 2009 MICHAEL D. DELORE, ET AL.
PRESENT: All the Justices HENRY ANDERSON, JR., ET AL. v. Record No. 082416 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 18, 2009 MICHAEL D. DELORE, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BEDFORD COUNTY
More informationNO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996
NO. 95-519 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996 A.C. WARNACK, Trustee of the A.C. WARNACK TRUST; and KENNETH R. MCDONALD, v. Plaintiffs, Appellants and Cross-Respondents, THE CONEEN FAMILY
More informationAppellants, CASE NO. 1D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SAVE OUR BEACHES, INC. and STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, INC., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationParty Walls. Institutional Repository. University of Miami Law School. Mark S. Berman. University of Miami Law Review
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Law Review 7-1-1971 Party Walls Mark S. Berman Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended
More informationQuestioning Authority: Presumptions in Property Tax Cases
W. Scott Wright Partner SUTHERLAND July 13, 2010 Southeastern Association of Tax Administrators Conference Questioning Authority: Presumptions in Property Tax Cases 1 Presumption of Correctness In property
More informationPresent: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ.
Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ. MCCARTHY HOLDINGS LLC OPINION BY v. Record No. 101031 JUSTICE S. BERNARD GOODWYN September 16, 2011 VINCENT W. BURGHER, III FROM THE CIRCUIT
More informationApril 2, Michel J. Danko Marine Fisheries Agent New Jersey Sea Grant Extension Program Building 22 Fort Hancock, NJ
April 2, 2008 Michel J. Danko Marine Fisheries Agent New Jersey Sea Grant Extension Program Building 22 Fort Hancock, NJ 07732 Dear Mike, Below is the summary of research regarding the questions you posed
More informationJonathan Gaunt QC MOORING RIGHTS
MOORING RIGHTS 1. In recent years there has been a rash of cases involving mooring boats on the River Thames: Port of London Authority v Ashmore [2009] EWHC 954; Couper v Albion Properties Limited [2013]
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES FOR REHEARING AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
County Civil Court: CIVIL PROCEDURE Summary Judgment. The trial court correctly found no issue of material fact and that Appellee was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Affirmed. Christian Mumme
More informationStaff Analysis and Economic Impact Statement
Staff Analysis and Economic Impact Statement Measure: SR 13 REFERENCE: ACTION: Sponsor: Subject: Finance and Tax Committee Just Valuation of Property 1. FTC 2. TBRC Favorable Pre-meeting Date: March 13,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION MICHAEL DAYTON, Petitioner, v. Case No.
More informationSECTION 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PANAMA CITY BEACH COMPREHENSIVE GROWTH DEVELOPMENT PLAN
1. PURPOSE SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PANAMA CITY BEACH COMPREHENSIVE GROWTH DEVELOPMENT PLAN The purpose of the City of Panama City Beach's Comprehensive Growth Development Plan is to establish goals,
More informationNo In the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 08-1151 -------------------------------- In the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ------------------------------- STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT, INC., v. Petitioner, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER COURT CASE NO. 3D PRIME WEST, INC. and PRIME WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 05-1697 LOWER COURT CASE NO. 3D04-471 PRIME WEST, INC. and PRIME WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioners, v. LORENZO CAMARGO and ANA CAMARGO, his wife;
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA COMMENTS OF THE HOUSING UMBRELLA GROUP OF FLORIDA LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FORM 1.996 (FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE) / CASE NO: SC09-1579 COMMENTS OF THE HOUSING UMBRELLA GROUP OF FLORIDA LEGAL
More informationRECITALS. Page 1 of 9
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF VOLUSIA AND THE CITY OF DEBARY FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION AND A UTILITY SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR POTABLE WATER THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and
More informationCS/HB 345 (Chapter , L.O.F.) Educational property tax exemption Committee on Real Property and Probate and Representative Brummer
**FINAL ACTION** **SEE FINAL ACTION STATUS SECTION** BILL #: RELATING TO: SPONSOR(S): COMPANION BILL(S): HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON Real Property and Probate FINAL ANALYSIS
More informationBLACKSTONE INVESTMENTS LLC
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2010 CA 1163 BLACKSTONE INVESTMENTS LLC VERSUS GENE STROTHER AND NELL CURRY STROTHER Judgment Rendered Max 6 2011 I I
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. Appellants, CASE NO.: SC
WALTON COUNTY et al., IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA v. Appellants, CASE NO.: SC06-1447 SAVE OUR BEACHES, INC. et al., Appellees. / AMENDED AMICUS BRIEF OF FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF
More informationc. elimination as encumbrance 1) express release 2) review of specific facts with underwriter (general description)
TITLE ISSUES IN EASEMENTS AND CCR S I Easements (the Company ) insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 9 and 10, after Date of Policy, against loss or damage, not exceeding
More informationSEBRING AIRPORT AUTHORITY v. MCINTYRE 718 So.2d 296, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2097 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1998)
SEBRING AIRPORT AUTHORITY v. MCINTYRE 718 So.2d 296, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2097 (Fla.App. 2 Dist. 1998) THE SEBRING AIRPORT AUTHORITY; Sebring International Raceway, Inc.; and The Department of Revenue, State
More informationDATE: September 10, 2013 RE: Seawall Review - Park Shore - Preliminary Legal and Title Review Report
TO: FROM: CC: Hon. John F. Sorey III, Mayor & Naples City Council Stephen E. Thompson & Robert D. Pritt A. William Moss, City Manager DATE: September 10, 2013 RE: Seawall Review - Park Shore - Preliminary
More informationFlorida Department of Environmental Protection Florida s State Lands Authorizations
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida s State Lands Authorizations Andrew J. Baumann, Esq. Kelly Samek, Senior Assistant General Counsel Sovereign Submerged Lands Lands under navigable
More informationDaniel M. Schwarz of Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for Appellants.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SILVER BEACH TOWERS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., SILVER BEACH TOWERS EAST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and SILVER BEACH TOWERS WEST
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D CORRECTED PACETTA, LLC, ETC., ET AL.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2013 TOWN OF PONCE INLET, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
More informationLIFE S A BEACH: OCEANFRONT PROPERTY ISSUES PATRICIA PATTISON DONALD SANDERS I. INTRODUCTION
LIFE S A BEACH: OCEANFRONT PROPERTY ISSUES PATRICIA PATTISON DONALD SANDERS I. INTRODUCTION The Public Trust Doctrine has caused significant angst for several oceanfront property owners. The Doctrine,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee. No. 4D14-0699 [October 14, 2015]
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED PELICAN CREEK HOMEOWNERS, LLC, H.A. BUSSEY,
More informationInsuring Easements Prepared By: Stewart J. Skip Sacks, Virginia State Counsel Stewart Title Guaranty Company
Insuring Easements Prepared By: Stewart J. Skip Sacks, Virginia State Counsel Stewart Title Guaranty Company I. Overview of Easements (10 min) A. Definition An Easement is an interest in land owned by
More informationHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS
BILL #: HB 425 Vacation Rentals SPONSOR(S): La Rosa TIED BILLS: IDEN./SIM. BILLS: SB 188 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR or BUDGET/POLICY CHIEF 1) Agriculture
More informationNo. 102,355 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JOHN BROWNBACK, Appellee,
No. 102,355 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS JOHN BROWNBACK, Appellee, v. JOHN/JANE DOE, TRUSTEE OF THE THOMAS M. GILKISON TRUST, Dated December 13, 1980; and RICHARD WILSON and MARY WILSON,
More informationCIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.
Electronically Filed 08/20/2013 09:39:44 AM ET IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. CARLOS LOPEZ-CANTERA, as Property Appraiser
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CVS EGL FRUITVILLE SARASOTA FL, ) LLC and HOLIDAY CVS, LLC, )
More informationFIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-1553 STERLING BREEZE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. NEW STERLING RESORTS, LLC and STERLING BREEZE, LLC, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
More informationStanding on Shaky Ground
2016 CLM Annual Conference April 6-8, 2016 Orlando, FL Standing on Shaky Ground As a general prerequisite to bringing an action, one must having standing to sue. Properly understood, Standing to sue is
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2001
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2001 FLORIDA WATER SERVICES CORPORATION, Appellant, v. UTILITIES COMMISSION, ETC., Case No. 5D00-2275 Appellee. / Opinion
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.? SC First DCA Case No.: 1D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA? --------------- SC-06-1449 First DCA Case No.: 1D05-4086? --------------- FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT
More informationSome Social and Policy Implications of Shore Erosion. James G. Titus U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Some Social and Policy Implications of Shore Erosion James G. Titus U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Four copyrighted photos included in briefing as fair use Deleted because duplication may violate
More informationCONFLICTING ELEMENTS
CONFLICTING ELEMENTS Order of importance of conflicting elements that determine land location: A. Unwritten rights. B. Senior right. C. Written intentions of Parties. D. Lines Marked and Run. E. Natural
More informationA Model Ordinance Establishing a Local Government Tax Deferral Program for Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront Properties
A Model Ordinance Establishing a Local Government Tax Deferral Program for Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront Properties Submitted to Waterfronts Florida Partnership Program State of Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC Lower Court Case Number 4D ELLER DRIVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC06-2351 Lower Court Case Number 4D04-3895 ELLER DRIVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Petitioner, vs. BROWARD COUNTY, a political subdivision of the STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationv. Case No SUMMARY FINAL ORDER Comes now, the undersigned arbitrator, and issues this summary final order as
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Federal National Mortgage Association,
More information~ Indiana ~ Easements and Rights of Way ~ ~ ~ IRWA Chapter 10 Annual Law Day. Indianapolis, Indiana. October 18, Presented by Gary R.
~ Indiana ~ Easements and Rights of Way ~ ~ ~ IRWA Chapter 10 Annual Law Day Indianapolis, Indiana October 18, 2017 Presented by Gary R. Kent, PS EASEMENT A limited, nonpossessory interest in the land
More informationCOMMERCIAL AND MULTI-USE DOCK PERMIT APPLICATION PINELLAS COUNTY WATER AND NAVIGATION
Direct all correspondence to: Clerk, Water and Navigation, 5 th Floor 315 Court Street Clearwater, FL 33756 COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-USE DOCK PERMIT APPLICATION I. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: PINELLAS COUNTY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE HENRY BLACK, MARY LOU BLACK, RAYMOND BUCHTA, W. SCOTT BLACK, AND BLACKBALL PROPERTIES, Defendants Below- Appellants, v. GARY STAFFIERI and ADRIA CHARLES STAFFIERI,
More informationREMEDIES Copyright February State Bar of California
REMEDIES Copyright February 2001 - State Bar of California In 1998, Diane built an office building on her land adjacent to land owned by Peter. Neither she nor Peter realized that the building encroached
More informationDAVIS v. GULF POWER CORP. 799 So.2d 298, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D2368 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 2001) District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
DAVIS v. GULF POWER CORP. 799 So.2d 298, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D2368 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 2001) District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. Richard DAVIS, Bay County Property Appraiser, Appellant, v.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC07-1079 DAVID J. LEVINE, et al, v. Appellants, JANICE HIRSHON, etc., et al, Appellees. REPLY BRIEF ON THE MERITS On Questions and Conflict of Decisions Certified by
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 25, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D14-2324 Lower Tribunal No. 14-21513 Two Islands
More informationFlorida Attorney General Advisory Legal Opinion
Florida Attorney General Advisory Legal Opinion Number: AGO 2008-52 Date: September 24, 2008 Subject: Tax status of Habitat for Humanity property Mr. Loren E. Levy The Levy Law Firm 1828 Riggins Lane Tallahassee,
More informationFlorida Attorney General Advisory Legal Opinion
Florida Attorney General Advisory Legal Opinion Number: AGO 2012-18 Date: May 17, 2012 Subject: Value Adjustment Board member, resignation Mr. Monroe D. Kiar 6191 Southwest 45th Street Suite 6151A Davie,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA ISLAND RESORTS INVESTMENTS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. CHRIS JONES, Property Appraiser for Escambia County, Florida, and
More informationChapter 72 CHRONIC PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT
Chapter 72 CHRONIC PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT 72-1. Legislative Findings 72-2. Definitions. 72-3. Presumption of violation. 72-4. Nuisance forbidden. 72-5. Presumption of knowledge. 72-6. Director of Codes
More informationBEACH STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION EASEMENT
STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF WALTON WALTON COUNTY, FL HURRICANE & STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT FILE/REACH#: PARCEL ID#: BEACH STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION EASEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that for and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA ROB TURNER, as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser, Petitioner, vs. Case No. SC08-540 FLORIDA STATE FAIR AUTHORITY, Respondent. / RESPONDENT S ANSWER
More informationPage 1 ARTICLE VI. - REGISTRATION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS. Sec Purpose.
ARTICLE VI. - REGISTRATION OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS Sec. 13-103. - Purpose. The City Council of the City of Destin recognizes that the unregulated rental of single-family detached dwelling units by seasonal
More informationFlorida's Sovereignty Submerged Lands Leases
Florida's Sovereignty Submerged Lands Leases Richard E. Englebright, Jr. * The author provides a primer on Florida's sovereignty submerged lands leases and the initial application process. On March 3,
More informationORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Town of Jupiter ( Town ) has adopted a Comprehensive Plan
0 0 ORDINANCE NO. -0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF JUPITER, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER OF THE TOWN CODE TO AMEND SECTION -, ENTITLED INTENT TO ADD PERMITTING LANDGUAGE; TO AMEND SECTION
More informationv. CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order from the Circuit Court for Walton County. William F. Stone, Judge.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SANDPIPER DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Florida corporation, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA WOODIE H. THOMAS, III on behalf of himself Petitioner, CASE NO. SC07-1527 FOURTH DCA CASE NO. 4D06-16 vs. VISION I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a non-profit
More informationMarch 8, Mr. Rick Shepherd, Secretary Board of Zoning Appeals Metro Howard Office Building 700 Second Avenue South Nashville, TN 37210
Mr. Rick Shepherd, Secretary Board of Zoning Appeals Metro Howard Office Building 700 Second Avenue South Nashville, TN 37210 Dear Mr. Secretary: Re: Case Number: 96-22 555 Church Street Map: 93-6-1 Parcel:
More informationAPPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY
STATE OF ARKANSAS APPRAISER LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION BOARD APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY RULES AND REGULATIONS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2010 1 Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board Appraisal Management
More informationS18A0430. CLAYTON COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS v. ALDEASA ATLANTA JOINT VENTURE.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: June 18, 2018 S18A0430. CLAYTON COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS v. ALDEASA ATLANTA JOINT VENTURE. BENHAM, Justice. This case presents the issue of whether the contract
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2005 ST. JOHNS/ST. AUGUSTINE, COMMITTEE, ETC., Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D04-3519 CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA, ETC., ET
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2008 DEBORAH LEDERER, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D07-1933 ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION, Appellee. / Opinion filed April
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2009
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2009 Opinion filed January 21, 2009. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D07-3006 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009 Opinion filed October 14, 2009. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D08-944 Lower Tribunal No. 03-14195
More informationPGA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC Fairway Drive, Suite 29 Palm Beach Gardens, FL TRANSFER OF PROPERTY CHECKLIST
PGA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. 7100 Fairway Drive, Suite 29 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418 TELEPHONE FACSIMILE 561-627-2800 561-622-6324 TRANSFER OF PROPERTY CHECKLIST The transfer of any property
More informationFLORIDA HI-LIFT v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE [571 So.2d 1364, 15 FLW D2967, 1990 Fla.1DCA 4762] FLORIDA HI-LIFT, Appellant,
FLORIDA HI-LIFT v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE [571 So.2d 1364, 15 FLW D2967, 1990 Fla.1DCA 4762] FLORIDA HI-LIFT, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee. No. 89-1947. District Court of Appeal of Florida,
More informationPREVENTING THE ACQUISITION OF A RIGHT OF LIGHT BY A CONSENT WITHIN SECTION 3 PRESCRIPTION ACT 1832 HOW CAN IT BE DONE AND WHAT PITFALLS ARE THERE?
PREVENTING THE ACQUISITION OF A RIGHT OF LIGHT BY A CONSENT WITHIN SECTION 3 PRESCRIPTION ACT 1832 HOW CAN IT BE DONE AND WHAT PITFALLS ARE THERE? By Andrew Francis, Barrister Serle Court, 6 New Square,
More informationI. BACKGROUND. As one of the most rapidly developing states in the country, North Carolina is losing
PROTECTING CONSERVATION EASEMENTS IN EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS Presented by W. Edward Poe, Jr. On Behalf of the NC Land Trust Council Environmental Review Commission December 18, 2008 I. BACKGROUND As
More informationALI-ABA Course of Study Historic Preservation Law. Cosponsored by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. November 3-4, 2005 Washington, D.C.
ALI-ABA Course of Study Historic Preservation Law Cosponsored by the National Trust for Historic Preservation November 3-4, 2005 Washington, D.C. Assessing Economic Hardship Claims Under Historic Preservation
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA 2 ND DCA CASE NO FSC CASE NO ROB TURNER, as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. Appellant, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA 2 ND DCA CASE NO. 07-1411 FSC CASE NO. 08-540 ROB TURNER, as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Appellant, vs. FLORIDA STATE FAIR AUTHORITY Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE
More informationWater Rights: Beds, Boats & Beaches
Water Rights: Beds, Boats & Beaches James W. Williams III Chicago Title Insurance Co. 3/16/2005 Chicago Title 1 Introduction Public Trust Doctrine & Submerged Lands Federal Navigational Servitude Who Owns
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS AND MOBILE HOMES. v. Case No.
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION VISTA DEL MAR ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner,
More informationMANDATORY RENT DEPOSITS?; TENANTS USE DELAYING TACTICS TO GAIN EDGE IN CURRENT SYSTEM 1
New York Law Journal March 11, 1996 MANDATORY RENT DEPOSITS?; TENANTS USE DELAYING TACTICS TO GAIN EDGE IN CURRENT SYSTEM 1 Probably the most hotly debated area of landlord-tenant litigation involves the
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA HERON AT DESTIN WEST BEACH & BAY RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA HERON AT DESTIN WEST BEACH & BAY RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
More informationRising Tides-Changing Title: Walton County v. Stop the Beach Renourishment
Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Pace Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2009 Rising Tides-Changing Title: Walton County v. Stop the Beach Renourishment John R. Nolon Elisabeth Haub School of Law
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SCO Petitioner, vs. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SCO01-663 ALVIN MAZOUREK, as Property Appraiser of Hernando County, Florida Petitioner, vs. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Respondents. ON REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2004 GEORGE T. BLACK, GLORIA D. BLACK, ET AL, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D03-2306 ORANGE COUNTY, ETC., Appellee. Opinion filed
More informationSENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 16, 2016
SENATE, No. 0 STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY, 0 Sponsored by: Senator JEFF VAN DREW District (Atlantic, Cape May and Cumberland) Senator ROBERT W. SINGER District 0 (Monmouth and
More informationThese related appeals concern the rights of certain sign companies to. construct billboards in areas formerly located in unincorporated Fulton
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: June 13, 2011 S11A0023. FULTON COUNTY et al. v. ACTION OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, JV et al. S11A0101. CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS et al. v. ACTION OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, JV et
More information(As usual, you don t know the rules until you know the grounds.)
Summary Ejectment for Criminal Activity (As usual, you don t know the rules until you know the grounds.) Step 1: What are the grounds? Breach of a lease condition (involving criminal activity OR criminal
More informationCity of Daytona Beach v. Tona-Rama, Inc., 294 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1974)
Florida State University Law Review Volume 2 Issue 4 Article 7 Fall 1974 City of Daytona Beach v. Tona-Rama, Inc., 294 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1974) Florida State University Law Review Follow this and additional
More informationSea-Level Rise and Flooding: Legal, Fiscal, & Regulatory Challenges for Local Governments, Part I
Sea-Level Rise and Flooding: Legal, Fiscal, & Regulatory Challenges for Local Governments, Part I Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style Thomas Ruppert Coastal Planning Specialist
More informationMEMORANDUM Clallam County Department of Community Development
MEMORANDUM Clallam County Department of Community Development Date: April 27, 2007 To: From: Subject: Planning Commission Selinda Barkhuis, Senior Planner May 2, 2007 Planning Commission Work Session Enclosed
More informationPublisher s Note 2019 Release 3 Previous release was
Publisher s Note 2019 Release 3 Previous release was 2019 2 From Your Library: Lamont Real Estate Conveyancing This 2nd edition of Donald Lamont s classic work on real estate practice covers the various
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DANIEL WESNER, d/b/a FISH TALES, Appellant, v. Case No. 2D16-4646
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.SC LOUIS B. GASKIN, Appellant, STATE OF FLORIDA, ET. AL., Appellee, INITIAL BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.SC01-982 LOUIS B. GASKIN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, ET. AL., Appellee, INITIAL BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT PETER J. CANNON CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL COUNSEL-MIDDLE
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Whiting, 1 Hassell, and Keenan, JJ.
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Whiting, 1 Hassell, and Keenan, JJ. Lacy, RICHARD F. DAVIS, ET AL. v. Record No. 941971 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY September 15, 1995 JOHN T. HENNING,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS New Filing Cherane Pefley : : Petitioner, : : v. : : (1) Governor Rick Scott in his : capacity as Chief Operating : Officer of the State of Florida.
More information