IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER COURT CASE NO. 3D PRIME WEST, INC. and PRIME WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
|
|
- Joseph Barnett
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER COURT CASE NO. 3D PRIME WEST, INC. and PRIME WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioners, v. LORENZO CAMARGO and ANA CAMARGO, his wife; and UNION AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents. On Petition for Review from The District Court of Appeal, Third District BRIEF OF RESPONDENT, UNION AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ON JURISDICTION JORGE A. LOPEZ, P.A. Counsel for Respondent, Union American Insurance Company 1500 San Remo Avenue, Suite 290 Coral Gables, Florida Telephone: Facsimile: By: Jorge A. Lopez Florida Bar Number
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES...ii INTRODUCTION...1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS.1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT...5 ARGUMENT...6 THE DISTRICT COURT DECISION DOES NOT EXPRESSLY AND DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH A DECISION OF ANOTHER DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OR OF THIS COURT ON THE SAME QUESTION OF LAW CONCLUSION 9 i
3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Childs v. Weissman, 432 So.2d 604 (Fla. App. 3 Dist. 1983) 7, 8 Dinkins v. Julian, 122 So.2d 620 (Fla. App. 2 Dist. 1960)...6, 9 Easton v. Appler, 548 So.2d 691 (Fla. App. 3 Dist. 1989)...7 Highland Const. v. Paquette, 697 So. 2d 235 (Fla. App. 5 Dist. 1997) 7 Reyes v. Perez, 284 So.2d 493 (Fla. App. 4 Dist. 1973)...8, 9 Southeast Seminole Civic Association, Inc. v. Adkins, 604 So.2d 523 (Fla. App 5 Dist. 1992).8 Zaucha v. Town of Medley, 66 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1953).6, 8 ii
4 INTRODUCTION Petitioners, Prime West, Inc. and Prime West Condominium Association, Inc., shall be referred to herein collectively as, Prime West ; Respondent, Union American Insurance Company, shall be referred to herein as, Union American ; Respondents, Lorenzo Camargo and Ana Camargo, his wife, shall be referred to herein collectively as, the Camargos ; references to the Appendix shall be to A. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS In its brief, Prime West asserts numerous points as fact although many of those assertions are not contained in the opinion of the District Court. Accordingly, Respondent, Union American, respectfully requests that any such assertions be regarded as argument by Prime West. The Camargos filed a complaint in the trial court seeking ingress and egress to their property under three alternative theories. One of the remedies sought was declaratory relief pursuant to Chapter 86 of the Florida Statutes, specifically, to confirm a pre-existing easement over the right of way known as N.W. 16 Street which abuts the Camargo property directly to the north. The Camargos sought judgment granting them use and enjoyment of the N.W. 16 Street right of way which had previously afforded them access to their property, but which had been taken from them when Prime West erected a fence between the Camargo property
5 and the road, thereby physically preventing the Camargos from accessing their property. Union American was in essence an innocent bystander who was drawn into the litigation simply by virtue of owning land next door. After a non-jury trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of the Camargos pursuant to Count III of the Complaint. Specifically, the trial court granted injunctive relief for removal of the fence blocking ingress and egress to lots 6, 7 and 8 from N.W. 16 Street to N.W. 108 Avenue. In reviewing the final judgment and the record on appeal, the District Court found the trial judge s decision to be well-reasoned, (A.6), and reversed only that portion of the final judgment which declared N.W. 16 Street to be a public road since dedication to the public had not been pled by the parties or proven below. (Id.) In its opinion, the District Court found that lot 5 {owned by Prime West}, lot 6 {owned by the Camargos}, and lots 7 & 8 {owned by Union American}, were depicted in an unrecorded plat known as Truman City. The District Court further found that lots 5, 6, 7 and 8 run west to east of each other with lot 5 being the western-most lot and lot 8 being the eastern-most lot. On the east side of lot 8, running north and south, is N.W. 108 Avenue. (A.2) At the heart of the case was a fifty foot wide strip of land that connects lot 5 to N.W. 108 Avenue and which directly abuts the north end of lots 6, 7 and 8.
6 (A.2) This fifty foot wide strip of land, referred to as N.W. 16 Street, was used as a roadway to gain access to the lots in Truman City from N.W. 108 Avenue. (A.4) The District Court found, as did the trial court, that most of the deeds in the parties chain of title, and throughout the history of the properties, explicitly contained descriptions of the fifty foot wide strip of property as a street, i.e., N.W. 16 Street, and that the deeds themselves explicitly made reference to the unrecorded plat of Truman City. (footnote 1, A.2) The District Court also found that the fifty foot wide strip of land was designated in the unrecorded plat of Truman City as a road called N.W. 16 Street. (Id.) In 1988, Lot 5, and by separate deed, the fifty foot wide strip of land known as N.W. 16 Street, were both purchased from Brody by Waldorf Properties. Significantly, the deed for the fifty foot wide strip from Brody to Waldorf explicitly burdened the property with a covenant running with the land which stated that upon written request from Brody, and without any further consideration, Waldorf would convey the property to Dade County for road right of way purposes. (A. 2-3) The District Court also noted the fact that the Brody family had retained ownership of the property immediately north of the fifty foot wide strip, i.e., N.W. 16 Street. (A.3)
7 The Camargos acquired Lot 6 in 1990, and for the seven years following their acquisition, they continuously used the roadway that directly abutted their lot to the north, i.e., N.W. 16 Street, for the purpose of gaining access to and from their property from N.W. 108 Avenue. (A. 3,4) The District Court found that, in 1991, Waldorf conveyed lot 5 and the fifty foot wide parcel to Ortega, subject to the road right of way covenant running with the land. (A.3) 1 In 1995, in conjunction with the development of his property for commercial purposes, Ortega obtained from Brody a release of the road right of way covenant which burdened the fifty foot wide parcel, and in return therefor, he granted the Brody Family Limited Partnership a perpetual nonexclusive access easement over and across the strip of property known as N.W. 16 Street, thereby giving the property retained by Brody access to N.W. 108 Avenue. (A.3) Thereafter, Ortega deeded both lot 5 and the fifty foot strip of property to Prime West. In 1997 Prime West erected a fence between the Camargo property and N.W. 16 Street, thereby 1 Although not explained in the District Court s opinion, Jose Ortega served as an officer of Prime West, Inc. and the trial court found, in its final judgment, that At all times material to this matter, Jose A. Ortega, through his business and personal relationships, was an agent of Prime West and his conduct and knowledge is imputed to Prime West (Final Judgment, Page 2, Paragraph 7)
8 preventing the Camargos from gaining access to their property, and thus, giving rise to this litigation. (A. 3, 4) The District Court found that the Camargos acquired title to their property along with the corresponding right to access their property via N.W. 16 Street and that said access was materially beneficial to the use and enjoyment of their lot. (A.5) The District Court did not create a new easement, nor did it create a new class of easement; it simply confirmed the existence of the implied private easement that had existed in favor of the Camargos and in favor of the lots adjacent to N.W. 16 Street for many years. The District Court further confirmed well settled law in Florida that the implied easement did not depend on the dedication of the road way to the public, but upon a private easement implied from the sale of the lots with reference to a plat showing streets that materially benefitted those lots. Relying on well settled precedent, the District Court found that the evidence revealed that Prime West was in a position to learn of the existence of N.W. 16 Street simply by inquiring into the facts known at the time of the purchase of their property, concluding that Prime West not only had constructive notice of Respondents existing private easement, through the chain of title, but that Prime West had actual notice of the easement. (A. 2-3). SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
9 Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(iv), in order for express and direct conflict jurisdiction to vest in this Court, the lower court must either announce a conflicting rule of law, or a rule of law must be misapplied in a case with substantially the same controlling facts. The District Court neither announced a conflicting or novel rule of law nor did the District Court misapply a rule of law involving substantially the same facts as those contained in the cases cited by the District Court. In fact, the District Court recognized the particular and quite compelling facts of the Camargo case and the Court s opinion is supported by long standing precedent. Contrary to Prime West s argument, the District Court did not create a new class of previously unrecognized easements, but rather simply confirmed the existence of an implied private easement in favor of the Respondents, gathered from the circumstances surrounding the conveyance and mean[s] that whatever [was] obviously in use as an incident or as an appurtenance [passed] by implication when the land [was] sold., citing Dinkins v. Julian, 122 So.2d 620 (Fla. App. 2 Dist. 1960) (A.4-5) ARGUMENT THE DISTRICT COURT DECISION DOES NOT EXPRESSLY AND DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH A DECISION OF ANOTHER DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OR OF THIS COURT ON THE SAME QUESTION OF LAW
10 The case of Zaucha v. Town of Medley, 66 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 1953), cited by the District Court, stands for the proposition that if in the investigation of a title, a purchaser, with common prudence, must have been apprised of another right, notice of that right is presumed as a matter of implied actual notice. The District Court did not announce a novel rule of law or a rule of law that conflicts with the rule of law enunciated in Zaucha. The District Court correctly applied the rule of law in Zaucha to the particular facts of the Camargo case, finding specifically that most of the deeds in the parties chain of title, and throughout the history of the properties, explicitly contained descriptions of the fifty foot wide strip of property as a street, i.e., N.W. 16 Street, and that the deeds themselves explicitly made reference to the unrecorded plat of Truman City. (footnote 1, A.2) In fact, the record reflected that the specific language contained in no less than six deeds within Prime West s chain of title clearly placed Prime West on notice that the land to the north of their property was a street. Therefore, the District Court found the evidence to reveal that Prime West was in a position to learn of the existence of N.W. 16 Street simply by inquiring into the facts known at the time of the purchase of their property and that Prime West not only had constructive notice of Respondents existing private easement, through the chain of title, but that Prime West had actual notice of that easement. (A. 2-3).
11 It is well settled that when property is purchased and the deed of conveyance refers to a plat for which streets, parks and other open areas are shown, purchasers acquire an implied private easement with respect to areas designated on the plat. Easton v. Appler, 548 So.2d 691 (Fla. App. 3 Dist. 1989); Highland Const. v. Paquette, 697 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 5 th DCA 1997). The District Court cited the case of Childs v. Weissman, 432 So.2d 604 (Fla. App. 3 Dist. 1983) as support for its affirmation of the implied easement in favor of the Camargos over the land identified as N.W. 16 Street. The Childs case held that when the appellant took title to her property, the abutting alley was materially beneficial to the enjoyment and use of her lots and that her rights to the use of the adjacent alley did not depend on the dedication of the alley way to the county, but upon a private easement implied from the sale of land with reference to a plat showing streets and alleys subject to use and enjoyment by the purchaser of the dominant land. Childs, at pages There is no support for Prime West s argument that the plat of Truman City must be recorded in order for it to be recognized. In Southeast Seminole Civic Association, Inc. v. Adkins, 604 So.2d 523 (Fla. App 5 Dist. 1992), it was held that the owners of lots depicted on the unrecorded plat of Chula Vista had, by implication of law, obtained easements across lands designated as roadways in the
12 subdivision depicted on the unrecorded plat when they brought their lots. See also Zaucha, supra at pp [notice of a roadway based upon unrecorded instruments and actual knowledge]. Prime West argues that the District Court opinion conflicts with Reyes v. Perez, 284 So.2d 493 (Fla. App. 4 Dist. 1973). The facts of the Reyes case could not be any more distinguishable from the facts of the Camargo case. Unlike the Camargo parcel, which has always abutted N.W. 16 Street and has had access by way of a road, i.e., N.W. 16 Street, for generations, in Reyes, the landlocked dominant tenement, Perez, (i.e. Camargo in our case) was truly landlocked because that parcel did not abut a road. In addition, the Reyes case involved the extra-legal use of the property which was the subject of the dispute, not decades of open and lawful use of a street by not only the Camargos, but also by abutting landowners and the public, in reliance upon dedication and on recorded deeds. A critical fact in the Camargo case, which was absent from the facts of the Reyes case, was the existence of a recorded grant of a perpetual non-exclusive access easement for specific roadway purposes (the Brody easement) over the land in dispute, and granted by the very party, i.e., Ortega/Prime West, who is guilty of erecting the fence that actually caused the Camargo property to be landlocked.
13 The District Court cited the rule of law enunciated in Dinkins v. Julian, 122 So.2d 620 (Fla. App. 2 Dist. 1960) that a grantee of land obtains all those apparent and visible easements which are beneficial to the use and enjoyment of the land granted. Prime West erroneously argues that the Dinkins decision is in conflict with the District Court s opinion. In fact, the District Court did not announce a new rule of law but simply applied the rule of law enunciated in Dinkins to the particular facts in the Camargo case, finding that the Camargos acquired title to their property along with the corresponding right to access their property via N.W. 16 Street and that said access was materially beneficial to the use and enjoyment of their lot. (A.5) CONCLUSION The District Court did not create an easement nor did it establish a new class of easement previously unrecognized under Florida law. The District Court merely confirmed a pre-existing implied private easement that existed in favor of the Camargos and abutting landowners by applying long standing rules of law to the particular facts of the Camargo case. Accordingly, Prime West s petition should be dismissed or denied. Respectfully submitted by: JORGE A. LOPEZ, P.A. Counsel for Respondent, Union American Insurance Company
14 1500 San Remo Avenue, Suite 290 Coral Gables, Florida Telephone: (305) Facsimile: (305) By: Jorge A. Lopez Florida Bar Number CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Brief on Jurisdiction was served by Regular U.S. Mail this day of October, 2005 on: Mario M. Ruiz, Esquire, Cohen Fox, P.A., Counsel for Petitioners, Miami Center, Suite 850, 201 South Biscayne Boulevard, Miami, Florida, ; Evan J. Langbein, Esquire, Langbein & Langbein, P.A., Counsel for Respondents, Lorenzo and Ana Camargo, at 8181 N.W. 154 Street, Suite #105, Miami Lakes, Florida 33014; and R. Daniel Koppen, Esq., Koppen, Watkins, Partners & Associates, P.A., Co-Counsel for Respondents, Lorenzo and Ana Camargo, at 1025 South (Old) Dixie Highway, Delray Beach, Florida, By: JORGE A. LOPEZ
15 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Brief on Jurisdiction of Respondent, Union American Insurance Company, is submitted in Times New Roman 14-point font in compliance with Fla. R. App. P (a)(2). By: JORGE A. LOPEZ
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
PRIME WEST, INC. and PRIME WEST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., v. Petitioners, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LORENZO CAMARGO and ANA CAMARGO, his wife; and UNION AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents. / CASE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO.: 3d TRIAL COURT CASE NO MARIA T.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-1526 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO.: 3d06-1873 TRIAL COURT CASE NO. 05-15150 MARIA T. THORNHILL Plaintiff / Petitioner Vs. ADMIRAL FARRAGUT CONDOMINIUM APARTMENTS
More informationTHE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FLORIDA WEST REALTY PARTNERS, LLC Petitioner, Case No.: SC07-155 Lower Court Case No.: 2D06-5808 v. MDG LAKE TRAFFORD, LLC, Respondent. / PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Mark
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC10-90 / SC10-91 (Consolidated) (Lower Tribunal Case No. s 3D08-944, )
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-90 / SC10-91 (Consolidated) (Lower Tribunal Case No. s 3D08-944, 03-14195) JOEL W. ROBBINS (Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser); IAN YORTY (Miami-Dade County
More informationParty Walls. Institutional Repository. University of Miami Law School. Mark S. Berman. University of Miami Law Review
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Law Review 7-1-1971 Party Walls Mark S. Berman Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: SC LOWER CASE NUMBER: 3D THOMAS KRAMER, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: SC04-815 LOWER CASE NUMBER: 3D03-2440 THOMAS KRAMER, Petitioner, v. VERENA VON MITSCHKE-COLLANDE and CLAUDIA MILLER-OTTO, in their capacity as the HEIRS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LEWIS Y. and BETTY T. WARD, et al., Petitioner, v. GREGORY S. BROWN, Property Appraiser of Santa Rosa County, et al., Case Nos. SC05-1765, SC05-1766 1st DCA Case No. 1D04-1629
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC Lower Court Case Number 4D ELLER DRIVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC06-2351 Lower Court Case Number 4D04-3895 ELLER DRIVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Petitioner, vs. BROWARD COUNTY, a political subdivision of the STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. ERVIN HIGGS, as Property Appraiser of Monroe County, Florida, CASE NO. SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ERVIN HIGGS, as Property Appraiser of Monroe County, Florida, CASE NO. SC04-1808 Petitioner, Lower Tribunals: Third District Court of Appeal v. Case No.: 3D03-1508 ISLAMORADA,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MELANIE J. HENSLEY, successor to RON SCHULTZ, as Citrus County Property Appraiser, etc., vs. Petitioner, Case No.: SC05-1415 LT Case No.: 5D03-2026 TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY
[Cite as Watson v. Neff, 2009-Ohio-2062.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY Jeffrey S. Watson, Trustee, : : Plaintiff-Appellant, : : Case No. 08CA12 v. : : DECISION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. ERVIN A. HIGGS, as Property Appraiser of Monroe County, Florida, CASE NO. SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ERVIN A. HIGGS, as Property Appraiser of Monroe County, Florida, CASE NO. SC08-2389 Petitioner, Lower Tribunals: Third District Court of Appeal v. Case No.: 3D08-564 WILLIAM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA The City of Key West, Florida, Petitioner, v. Kathy Rollison, Respondent. Supreme Court Case No. SC04-1506 PETITIONER'S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF (Amended) On Review from the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA ROB TURNER, as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser, Petitioner, vs. Case No. SC08-540 FLORIDA STATE FAIR AUTHORITY, Respondent. / RESPONDENT S ANSWER
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC Fourth DCA Case No. 4D09-728
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11-263 Fourth DCA Case No. 4D09-728 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, JERALD MCLAUGHLIN, individually, and CARL E. ALBREKSTEN, individually, vs.
More informationBARBARA BEACH OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS FEBRUARY 27, 2014 JAY TURIM, TRUSTEE, ET AL.
PRESENT: All the Justices BARBARA BEACH OPINION BY v. Record No. 130682 JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS FEBRUARY 27, 2014 JAY TURIM, TRUSTEE, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA Lisa B. Kemler,
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BRUCE W. CHARITY and GABRIELE CHARITY, as husband and wife; MARJORIE
More informationPresent: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ.
Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ. MCCARTHY HOLDINGS LLC OPINION BY v. Record No. 101031 JUSTICE S. BERNARD GOODWYN September 16, 2011 VINCENT W. BURGHER, III FROM THE CIRCUIT
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC06-2461 DOUGLAS K. RABORN, et al., Appellants, vs. DEBORAH C. MENOTTE, etc., Appellee. [January 10, 2008] BELL, J. We have for review two questions of Florida law certified
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA WOODIE H. THOMAS, III on behalf of himself Petitioner, CASE NO. SC07-1527 FOURTH DCA CASE NO. 4D06-16 vs. VISION I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. a non-profit
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D., 2013
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D., 2013 Opinion filed September 25, 2013. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D12-2257 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationAPPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF McDONALD COUNTY. Honorable John R. LePage, Associate Circuit Judge
RUSSELL VAN ELK, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, vs. DARLENE L. URBANEK, as Trustee of the DARLENE L. URBANEK TRUST, Dated May 2, 2005, and Nos. SD 29364 & SD29412 DARLENE L. URBANEK, Individually, Opinion
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF APPELLEES
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-222 4 TH DCA CASE NO.: 4D03-711 L.T. NO.: AP 01-9039-AY PIERSON D. CONSTRUCTION, INC., A Florida corporation vs. Appellant MARTIN YUDELL and JUDITH
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC01-1459 PER CURIAM. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. LUIS SUAREZ and LILIA SUAREZ, Respondents. [December 12, 2002] We have for review the decision in Allstate
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LEESBURG COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a INTERCOMMUNITY CANCER CENTER,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-315 LEESBURG COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a INTERCOMMUNITY CANCER CENTER, Appellant/Petitioner, vs. LEESBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-765
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-765 AL-NAYEM INTER L INCORPORATED Plaintiff/Petitioner, vs. EDWARD J. ALLARD, Defendant/Respondent. PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION SECOND DISTRICT CASE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
HAROLD COFFIELD and WINDSONG PLACE, LLC, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Petitioners/Plaintiffs, CASE NO.: SC 09-1070 v. L.T.: 1D08-3260 CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, Respondent/Defendant, / PETITIONERS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (DCA 1DO2-4491) KEETON CORRECTIONS, INC., d/b/a JACKSONVILLE MINIMUM SECURITY SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITY.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (DCA 1DO2-4491) KEETON CORRECTIONS, INC., d/b/a JACKSONVILLE MINIMUM SECURITY SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITY Petitioner, v. RJ & RK, INC., a corporation and KIMBERLY KEETON SPENCE,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 15, 2007 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 15, 2007 Session JUDITH ANN FORD v. JAMES W. ROBERTS, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 01-0846 Howell N. Peoples, Chancellor
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC03-2063 WELLS, J. CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC, Petitioner, vs. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. [May 19, 2005] We have for review Crescent Miami Center, LLC v. Department
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC Lower Tribunal Case No.: 3D SPENCER MCGUINNESS, Petitioner, PROSPECT ARAGON, LLC,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC08-1294 Lower Tribunal Case No.: 3D07-1452 SPENCER MCGUINNESS, Petitioner, v. PROSPECT ARAGON, LLC, Respondent. PETITIONER S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION (with
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR BINDING ARBITRATION - HOA Indian Lake Estates, Inc.,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC07-1079 DAVID J. LEVINE, et al, v. Appellants, JANICE HIRSHON, etc., et al, Appellees. REPLY BRIEF ON THE MERITS On Questions and Conflict of Decisions Certified by
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA : SURF SIDE TOWER CONDOMINIUM : ASSOCIATION, INC.; and : INTERVENORS, CHARLES AND : LINDA SCHROPP, : : Defendant/Intervenors/Petitioners, : CASE NUMBER: SC10-1141 v. : :
More informationRESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Property Owners Association of Arundel-on-the-Bay, Inc.
PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ARUNDEL-ON-THE-BAY, INC., et al. Plaintiffs/Counter Defendant v. JOYCE Q MCMANUS Defendant/Counter Plaintiff * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT * OF MARYLAND * FOR * ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RICHARD KEITH MARTIN, ROBERT DOUGLAS MARTIN, MARTIN COMPANIES OF DAYTONA BEACH, MARTIN ASPHALT COMPANY AND MARTIN PAVING COMPANY, Petitioners, CASE NO: 92,046 vs. DEPARTMENT
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed September 19, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D12-360 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA 2 ND DCA CASE NO FSC CASE NO ROB TURNER, as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. Appellant, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA 2 ND DCA CASE NO. 07-1411 FSC CASE NO. 08-540 ROB TURNER, as Hillsborough County Property Appraiser Appellant, vs. FLORIDA STATE FAIR AUTHORITY Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, Petitioner, CASE NO: SC03-400 FIFTH DCA NO: 5D01-3413 v. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, Respondent. / On Discretionary Review from the District Court
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Whiting, 1 Hassell, and Keenan, JJ.
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Whiting, 1 Hassell, and Keenan, JJ. Lacy, RICHARD F. DAVIS, ET AL. v. Record No. 941971 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY September 15, 1995 JOHN T. HENNING,
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ROBERT BLINN, Appellant, v. Case No. 2D14-1636 FLORIDA POWER &
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT BARBARA L. BARNEY, ERNEST W. BARNEY, ET AL., Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT STEPHEN SINATRA and JANICE SINATRA, Appellants, v. Case No. 2D12-1031
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION LEO-PAUL MASSE, Petitioner, v. Case No.
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA International Development : Corporation, : Appellant : : v. : No. 1805 C.D. 2010 : Argued: June 6, 2011 Sherwood B. Davidge and Calvery : Crary, their heirs, executors,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed February 23, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wapello County, Michael R.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-087 / 10-0949 Filed February 23, 2011 MARGARET ELLIOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. WAYNE JASPER, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wapello
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SOUTH COVE CONDO ASSN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED October 31, 2006 v No. 270571 Berrien Circuit Court DUNESCAPE @ NEW BUFFALO II, LTD, LC No. 2005-002810-CZ Defendant-Appellee.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. L.T. CASE NO. 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. L.T. CASE NO. 4D04-3895 ELLER DRIVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a : Florida Limited Partnership : : Respondent, : : v. : : BROWARD COUNTY, a Political : Subdivision of
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GARY R. NIKOLITS, as Property Appraiser for Palm Beach County, Florida, Petitioner, v. SARAH B. NEFF, a/k/a SUSAN B. NEFF, a/k/a SALLY B.
More informationIN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC vs. CASE NO. 2D
IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORP., a Delaware corporation authorized to do business in Florida, Petitioner, CASE NO. SC06-1522 vs. CASE NO. 2D05-3583 HONEST AIR CONDITIONING
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAULA McCARTHA, vs. Petitioner, Case No. SC06-466 Fifth District Case No. 5D05-1776 THE CADLE COMPANY, Respondent. / RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Petition to Review a Decision
More informationENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO JULY TERM, 2018
Note: In the case title, an asterisk (*) indicates an appellant and a double asterisk (**) indicates a crossappellant. Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2004 GEORGE T. BLACK, GLORIA D. BLACK, ET AL, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D03-2306 ORANGE COUNTY, ETC., Appellee. Opinion filed
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009 Opinion filed October 14, 2009. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D08-944 Lower Tribunal No. 03-14195
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 18, 2009 MICHAEL D. DELORE, ET AL.
PRESENT: All the Justices HENRY ANDERSON, JR., ET AL. v. Record No. 082416 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN September 18, 2009 MICHAEL D. DELORE, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BEDFORD COUNTY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (Lower Tribunal Case No. 3D ) REALTY INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INC.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-2051 (Lower Tribunal Case No. 3D05-2129) REALTY INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INC., Petitioner, vs. JOEL W. ROBBINS, as Property Appraiser for Miami-Dade
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION. Petitioners, RULING AND ORDER JENNIFER E. NASHOLD, CHAIRPERSON:
STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION ROBERT J. LAWRENCE AND CHARLES M. KEMPLER (DEC'D), DOCKET NO. 05-T-83 Petitioners, vs. RULING AND ORDER WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. JENNIFER E.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 4, 2018
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 4, 2018 10/05/2018 HERBERT T. STAFFORD v. MATTHEW L. BRANAN Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sequatchie County No. 2482
More informationWilliam S. Graessle of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees. In this eminent domain action, the JEA appeals a final order awarding
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JEA, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationBorowski v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, Wis: Court of Appeals, 1st...
Page 1 of 5 JOHN BOROWSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Appeal No. 2013AP537. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District I. Filed: December 27, 2013. Before
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 21, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Nos. 3D17-1198 & 3D17-1197 Lower Tribunal Nos. 16-26521 and
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2004 ALLISON M. COSTELLO, ETC., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D02-3117 THE CURTIS BUILDING PARTNERSHIP, Appellee. Opinion filed
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Sunrise of Palm Beach Condominium Association,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION INDIAN PINES VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationTitle: Ronald J. Schultz, Citrus County Property Appraiser. Jun 03, 1994 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Title: Ronald J. Schultz, Citrus County Property Appraiser Jun 03, 1994 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ) IN RE: RONALD J. SCHULTZ, ) CITRUS COUNTY ) CASE NO.DOR 94-2-DS PROPERTY APPRAISER ) ) ORDER
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Surf House Condominium Association, Inc.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L.T. Case No. 3D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-2051 L.T. Case No. 3D05-2129 REALTY INVESTMENT & MORTGAGE CORPORATION, INC., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, vs. JOEL W. ROBBINS, in his official capacity
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PAUL MARINO and LINDA MARINO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED June 19, 2001 v No. 215764 Wayne Circuit Court GRAYHAVEN ESTATES LTD., LLC, LC No. 98-813922-CH GRAYHAVEN-LENOX
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION PARADISE POINTE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 25, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-1531 Lower Tribunal No. 13-16460 Laguna Tropical,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION ORLANDO IGLESIAS and NANCY IGLESIAS, Petitioners,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOHN SCHOENHERR, SHELLEY SCHOENHERR, TIMOTHY SPINA, and ELIZABETH SPINA, UNPUBLISHED November 22, 2002 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v No. 235601 Wayne Circuit Court VERNIER
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 25, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D14-2324 Lower Tribunal No. 14-21513 Two Islands
More informationWAVERLY AT LAS OLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation, not-for-profit, Appellee. No. 4D
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT WAVERLY 1 AND 2, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellant, v. WAVERLY AT LAS OLAS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida corporation,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STEPHEN and DONNA RICHARDS, Appellants, v. Case No. SC07-1383 Case No. 4D06-1173 L.T. Case No. 2004-746CA03 MARILYN and ROBERT TAYLOR, Appellees. / An Appeal from the Fourth District
More informationCONSENT ACTION BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF VENETO IN MIRAMAR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
CONSENT ACTION BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF VENETO IN MIRAMAR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. The undersigned, being all of the members of the Board of Directors of Veneto in Miramar Condominium Association,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Geraldine Jaramillo, Petitioner, v. Case
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED PELICAN CREEK HOMEOWNERS, LLC, H.A. BUSSEY,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2002
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2002 SAND LAKE SHOPPES FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D01-1534 SAND LAKE COURTYARDS, L.C., ET AL.,
More informationMEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Property Owners Association of Arundel-on-the-Bay, Inc.
PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF ARUNDEL-ON-THE-BAY, INC., et al. v. Plaintiff/Counter Defendants JOYCE Q MCMANUS Defendant/Counter Plaintiff * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT * OF MARYLAND * FOR * ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION KEYS RV/MOBILE HOME CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JANOURA PARTNERS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellant, v. PALM BEACH IMPORTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee. No.
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION OLIVE GLEN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION MRS. JOSEPH M. PHILBIN, Petitioner, v.
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION LAS BRISAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NEW
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THOMAS MCKEAN, ET AL., vs. Petitioner, PETER WARBURTON, Respondent. CASE NO. SC04-1243 Lower Tribunal No. 4D03-1954 PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS Bruce D. Barkett, Esq.
More informationCase 8:13-bk MGW Doc 391 Filed 07/01/14 Page 1 of 12
Case 8:13-bk-10798-MGW Doc 391 Filed 07/01/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION www.flmb.uscourts.gov In re: 2408 W. Kennedy, LLC, Case No. 8:13-bk-10798-MGW
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT. } Appeal of Robustelli Realty } Docket No Vtec } Decision on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment
STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } Appeal of Robustelli Realty } Docket No. 255-12-05 Vtec } Decision on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Appellant Robustelli Realty (Robustelli) appealed from the
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Golden Horn South Condominium Association,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2003
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2003 LAUREN KYLE HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a SAGO HOMES, Appellant, v. CASE NOS. 5D02-3358 5D03-980 HEATH-PETERSON CONSTRUCTION
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MATTHEW J. SCHUMACHER, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION April 1, 2003 9:10 a.m. v No. 233143 Midland Circuit Court DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION GRAND ISLES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,
More informationWALTER A. HEUSCHKEL and BONNIE L. HEUSCHKEL, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants/Appellees,
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationDaniel M. Schwarz of Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for Appellants.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SILVER BEACH TOWERS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., SILVER BEACH TOWERS EAST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., and SILVER BEACH TOWERS WEST
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2006 REMINGTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D05-2271 EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF OSCEOLA, etc., et
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LAKE FOREST PARTNERS 2, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION June 6, 2006 9:05 a.m. v No. 257417 Tax Tribunal DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, LC No. 00-292089 Respondent-Appellee.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS NATHAN KLOOSTER, Petitioner-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION December 15, 2009 9:10 a.m. v No. 286013 Tax Tribunal CITY OF CHARLEVOIX, LC No. 00-323883 Respondent-Appellee.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC14-461
Filing # 11351594 Electronically Filed 03/14/2014 01:09:56 PM RECEIVED, 3/14/2014 13:13:45, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC14-461
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Bravura I Condominium Association, Inc.,
More information