THOMASHIRE ESTATES. 8 Lots

Transcription

1 THOMASHIRE ESTATES PFN FSD Council District: 5 Applicant: Darryl and Lora Thomas Owners Surveyor: Paul J. Darrow Registered Professional Land Surveyor 8 Lots Mitigation Category Total Fees Total per Unit Fee Parks & Recreation $10, County Roads $9, City of Granite Falls $2, Lake Stevens School Dist. No. 4 At bldg permit $1, $1, $ At bldg permit

2 PARTIES OF RECORD REGISTOR SD THOMAS SHIRE ESTATES HEARING: 2/22/ SD SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT BRENT RAASINA 3020 RUCKER AVE SUITE 104 EVERETT WA SNO CO PUD NO 1 DEAN SAKSENNMISTY STEVENS PO BOX 1107 EVERETT WA GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS 2802 WETMORE AVE SUITE 220 EVERETT SNO CO PLANNING & DEV/LAND USE ED CAINE 3000 ROCKEFELLER AVE #604 EVERETT WA STILLAGUAMISH TRIBES SHAWN YANITY PO BOX 277 ARLINGTON WA DARRYL AND LORA THOMAS WAGNER RD MONROE WA LAND RESOLUTIONS RY MCDUFFY 3605 COLBY A V EVERETT WA SNO CO DEPT OF PUBIC WORKS 3000 ROCKEFELLER AVE #607 EVERETT WA CITY OF GRANITES FALLS DARLA REESE NO ADDRESS GIVEN WA STATE DEPT OF ECOLOGY PAUL ANDERSON TH SE BELLEVUE WA LAKE STEVENS SCHOOL DISTRICT ROBB STANTON ND ST NE LAKE STEVENS WA WAST DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION GEORGE CHAMBERS ChambGW@wsdot.wa.gov PATRICK MILLER RD AVENUE NE LAKE STEVENS WA PHILLIP SOLOMON psolomon@stillaguamish.com CRAIG HEERSCHAP RD AVENUE NE LAKE STEVENS WA JERRY CARLSON TH STREET NE LAKE STEVENS WA BENEN HEIKKOLA TH STREET NE LAKE STEVENS WA 98258

3 SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL Snohomish County, Washington MOTION NO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT OF THOMASHIRE ESTATES, FKA THOMAS SHIRE ESTATES PFN FSD WHEREAS, Darryl D. Thomas and Lora I. Thomas, husband and wife, applied to Snohomish County for final plat approval of the plat of Thomashire Estates (fka Thomas Shire Estates), PFN FSD; and WHEREAS, the plat consists of Slots on acres of property located at h St NE, Lake Stevens; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner on 5 March 2012, with a Minor Revision dated 11 August 2015, and a Traffic Memo dated 11 June 2015; and WHEREAS, the final plat was approved by the Snohomish County Public Works Department, Department of Planning and Development Services, Treasurer, Health District and Fire Marshal; and WHEREAS, the Council reviewed the record on the final plat of Thomashire Estates and considered all applicable state laws and county ordinances; NOW, THEREFORE, ON MOTION: Section 1. The Snohomish County Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. Preliminary approval of the plat of Thomashire Estates (fka Thomas Shire Estates) was given by the order of the Hearing Examiner dated 5 March 2012 (PFN SD) with a Minor Revision dated 11 August 2015 (PFN PSD) and a Traffic Memo dated 11 June 2015 (PFN SD), copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. The conditions of the preliminary approval found in the Hearing Examiner Disposition (PFN SD) have been satisfied. Section 2. The Snohomish County Council makes the following conclusions: 1. Appropriate provisions have been made for the public health, safety, and general welfare. Motion Final plat of Thomashire Estates, fka Thomas Shire Estates PFN FSD Page 1 of 2

4 2. Appropriate consideration has been given to open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and playgrounds. 3. Appropriate consideration has been given to sites for schools and school grounds. 4. Appropriate consideration has been given to the physical characteristics of the proposed final plat. 5. The final plat conforms to all terms of the preliminary plat approval. 6. The final plat meets the requirements of RCW and SCC 30.41A.640 and other relevant codes. 7. The public use and interest will be served by establishment of the subdivision and dedication. Section 3. The Snohomish County Council has determined that the final plat of Thomashire Estates has been completed in accordance with RCW and SCC 30.41A.640 and approves the final plat. PASSED this day of, SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL Snohomish County, Washington Council Chair ATTEST: Asst. Clerk of the Council Motion Final plat ofthomashire Estates, fka Thomas Shire Estates PFN FSD Page 2 of 2

5 DECISION of the SNOHOMISH COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER DATE OF DECISION: PLAT/PROJECT NAME: APPLIAPPLICANTANT/ LANDOWNER: FILE NO.: TYPE OF REQUEST: DECISION (SUMMARY): March 5, 2012 THOMAS SHIRE ESTATES Darryl and Lora Thomas Wagner Road Monroe, WA so Preliminary Subdivision Approval - RCS Under former Chapter C SCC APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS BASIC INFORMATION LOCATION: th Street NE, Lake Stevens, WA ACREAGE: NUMBER OF LOTS: AVERAGE LOT SIZE: MINIMUM LOT SIZE: GROSS DENSITY: acres 8 20,000 square feet 20,000 square feet 0.42 dulac GMACP DESIGNATION: Rural Residential-5 (1 duper 5 acres, Basic), within the Rural/Urban Transition Area (RUTA) Overlay ZONING: UTILITIES: Water: Sewer: Electricity: SCHOOL DISTRICT: FIRE DISTRICT: R-5 Snohomish County PUD No. 1 On-site individual septic Snohomish County PUD No. 1 Lake Stevens School District No.4 Snohomish County Fire District No. 8

6 PDS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve with conditions NOTE: For a complete record, an electronic recording of the hearing in this case and the Tape Log is available in the Office of the Hearing Examiner. Based on a preponderance of the evidence of record, the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Decision are entered. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Regulatory Review and Vesting. An application was submitted to the Department of Planning and Development Services (PDS) on March 12, 2009 and was vested as of April 9, 2009 for purposes of regulatory review. (Exhibits A.1, A.2, K) The 120-day clock started on April 9, PDS provided its review comments to the Applicant on May 26, (Exhibit H) A request for an application deadline extension was received on May 6, 2009 (Exhibit A.6), which was approved on May 27, 2009 (Exhibit G.2). Two years later, the Applicant resubmitted its proposal on March 9, PDS and the Applicant exchanged plan sets and review comments one more time and the project was determined to meet regulatory requirements on January 4, The Applicant waived the 120-day timelines applicable in this case. As of the date of the public hearing, 114 days of the 120-day timeline had elapsed. 2. Public Hearing. A public hearing was held on February 22, Appearing at the hearing on behalf of PDS was Ed Caine. Ry McDuffy appeared on behalf of the Applicant Several members of the public were present, but no person asked to testify or provide additional comments as to the pending application. 3. The Record. All of the exhibits shown on the master List of Exhibits (Exhibits A.1 through J. 1) were entered into the record as evidence, along with the testimony of witnesses presented at the open record hearing and the Tape Log. After the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner called for additional information from PDS, because information relating to recommended transportation improvements required by Chapter 30.66B SCC was inadvertently omitted from the record, although it was referenced in the Staff Recommendation. (See, Exhibit K. 1 and K. 1 a) The requested information was received on February 27, 2011, in the form of a report prepared by Mark Brown dated March 22, (See, Exhibit K.2). The entire record was considered by the Examiner in reaching this decision. 4. Public Notice. The Examiner finds that PDS concurrently gave proper public notice of the open record hearing, SEPA threshold determination, and Traffic Concurrency and Impact Fee Determinations as required by the County Code. (Exhibits E. 1, E.2, F. 1, F.2 and F.3) A. Background Information 5. Applicant's Proposal: The Applicant is requesting an 8-lot Rural Cluster Subdivision (RCS) on a acre parcel. The parcel is located in an area designated as a Rural Urban Transition Area (RUTA) and is zoned R-5. Sixty-seven percent of the site is designated as Interim Open Space. Access to each lot is by individual driveways off of a 2

7 new private road, taking access off of 44th St. NE. Each lot will be served by an individual septic system and potable water will be provided by Snohomish County PUD No Existing Conditions. The site is bounded by 44th St. NE to the north and by the Centennial Trail, a County Parks trail system, to the south. The central portion of the site is upland, with a Category 3 wetland located on the northwestern portion of the site, and Category 4 wetlands located on the eastern and southern portions of the site. The central and eastern portion of the site is pasture, with trees within the northwestern and southern wetland areas. The site contains a single family residence, with outbuildings. Surrounding properties are zoned R-5. Other properties in the area are either developed as single family residences or are undeveloped. 7. Issues of Concern: A. Agency Comments. agency reviews. No issues of concern were raised after technical and B. Citizen Comments. In response to the Notice of the SEPA Determination and Public Hearing, PDS received two (2) public comments (Exhibits 1.1 and 1.2) and one agency comment (Exhibit 1.3). The public comments express concerns regarding drainage, traffic, and impacts to the existing wells in the area. The Applicant and PDS have addressed each of those concerns, as documented in the Staff Recommendation (Exhibit 1), and through the testimony of Ed Caine and Ry McDuffy presented at the public hearing. B. Compliance with Codes and Policies. 8. Park and Recreation Impact Mitigation (Chapter 30.66A SCC) The proposal is within Centennial Park Service Area, No. 306, and is subject to Chapter 30.66A SCC, which requires payment of $1, per each new single-family residential unit, to be paid prior to building permit issuance for each unit. The Examiner finds that such payment is acceptable mitigation for parks and recreation impacts in accordance with County policies. 9. Traffic Mitigation and Road Design Standards (Title 13 SCC, & Chapters and SCC) The Hearing Examiner has considered the impacts of the development in light of the requirements under Title 13 SCC, EDDS, and Chapters and sec and finds that the development proposal, as conditioned based on the information in the record and in the PDS Staff Recommendation, meets the County's traffic mitigation and road design standards. (See, Exhibit K.2) A. Road System Impacts, Concurrency and Inadequate Road Conditions (IRC). A development shall mitigate its impact upon the future capacity of the Snohomish County road system by paying a road system impact fee reasonably related to the impacts of the development on arterial roads located in the same transportation service area as the development, at the rate identified in sec for the type and location of the proposed development. A development's road system impact fee will be equal to the development's new average daily traffic (ADT), based on the latest edition of the ITE Trip Generation report published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, times the per trip amount for the specific transportation service area identified in SCC PDS has reviewed the proposal and determined that an impact fee in the amount of $26, is owed for impacts to County roads within TSA "B", based upon 9.57 ADT per unit (with certain allowed deductions and credits), for a total new 3

8 ADT of trips for the entire proposal. family residence is $3, The amount to be paid per single The subject development has been evaluated for concurrency under the provisions of SCC and was deemed concurrent as of June 2, The concurrency determination approval expires on June 2, 2015, six years from the date concurrency was given. The subject development is located in TSA "B" which, as of the date of submittal, had the following arterial units in arrears: Unit # h St. SE from SR 2 WB Trestle Entrance to SR 9. This unit is no longer in arrears. Based on peak-hour trip distributions, the subject development will not add three (3) or more directional peak-hour trips to this arterial unit. Pursuant to SCC 30.66B.160(2)(a) the development is determined concurrent. The development generates 5.25 a.m. peak-hour trips and 7.07 p.m. peak-hour trips which is not more than the threshold of 50 peak-hour trips in which case the development would also have to be evaluated under sec Finally, the subject proposal will not impact any IRC locations identified at this time within TSA 'B' with three or more of its p.m. peak hour trips, nor will it create any. Therefore, it is anticipated that mitigation will not be required with respect to inadequate road conditions and no restrictions to building permit issuance or certificate of occupancy/final inspection will be imposed under this section of Chapter SCC. 8 Frontage Improvements (SCC ) DPW Rule (1) requires full rural frontage improvements along the subject parcel's frontage on 44th St. NE which consist of: Asphalt concrete pavement consisting of 18 feet in width from roadway/right-of-way centerline with a 7 foot paved shoulder. The Applicant submitted a deviation request to the County Engineer to construct a partial improvement from the new access point on 44th St. NE to the western property boundary (Exhibit G.1 ). The proposal is for a 4 foot paved shoulder in this area in order to avoid wetland impacts. The request was approved. The Hearing Examiner finds that no additional frontage improvements are necessary to mitigate impacts of the proposed development. C. Access and Circulation (SCC and Chapter SCC) The Department of Public Works (DPW) considered the application in light of its proposed access and road circulation, the extent of existing facilities and right-ofway, sight-distances and any needed improvements to any of these items. The DPW performed a site inspection of the subject property on May 28, Stopping and intersection sight distances were evaluated at the proposed entrance to the subject development on 44th St. NE. Stopping and intersection sight distances were found to meet the minimum requirements of EDDS Access to Lots 1 through 8 is shown to be by a private road off of 44th St NE. The new private road is proposed to be 20 feet wide within a 40 foot road tract that terminates in a 50 foot radius cul-de-sac. The new private road meets the minimum private road standards per the EDDS 3-060, and the minimum 4

9 standards for road ends per the EDDS Vertical and horizontal curves for the new private road within the subject development conform to the EDDS Table 3-4 for horizontal curves, and the EDDS Table 3-5 for maximum grades. The new private road angle of intersection with 44 1 h St. NE meets the minimum standards of EDDS Section 3-09(A). According to SCC 30.41A.210(1), all subdivisions shall be served by an open, constructed, and maintained public road to which the road system within the subdivision must connect. However, according to SCC 30.41A.21 0(3)(C), private roads may be permitted as part of a rural cluster subdivision where specifically approved by the County Engineer. The Applicant has submitted a request to allow the use of a private road within the boundary of the subject development. The use of private roads is acceptable to the DPW. D. In determining the extent of required improvements, the Director of DPW considers, among other relevant factors, the criteria set forth in sec (a) through (p). The Hearing Examiner has reviewed those factors and discussion set forth in Exhibit K.2, and finds that the recommended extent of improvements are consistent with sec and the facts set forth in the entire record. E. Right-of-Way Requirements (SCC and ) A development shall be required to dedicate, establish or deed right-of-way to the County for road purposes as a condition of approval of the development, when to do so is reasonably necessary as a direct result of a proposed development, for improvement, use or maintenance of the road system serving the development. The road serving this development, 44th St. NE, is designated as a non-arterial and requires a right-of-way width of 30 feet on each side of the right-of-way centerline. Currently, 15 to 30 feet of right-of-way exists on the development's side of the right-of-way. Therefore, the development is required to dedicate varying widths of additional right-of-way, between 0 and 15 feet, depending upon the specific location. The required right-of-way dedication is adequately shown on the preliminary plat plan (Exhibit 8.1 ). A condition requiring the dedication of right-of-way has been included. 44th St. NE is not in the impact fee cost basis (Appendix D of the Transportation Needs Report); therefore credit towards the Applicant's impact fee for the dedicated right-of-way that is more than 30 feet from centerline is not applicable. F. Impacts to State Highways (SCC ) No impacts to state highways have been found as a result of the subject development application. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) reviewed the Applicant's offer, and concurred that no mitigation is required (Exhibit H.8). G. Impacts to City Streets and Roads (SCC ) Mitigation requirements for impacts on streets inside cities and roads in other counties will be established consistent with the terms of interlocal agreements (!LAs) between the County and the other jurisdictions. Here, Snohomish County has an ILA with the City of Granite Falls and this development is within the influence area that requires traffic mitigation be considered for the City. The development is located within the CO-GF-8 mitigation sub-area; ten percent of the development's trips will pass through the 5

10 City of Granite Falls. According to the Applicant's traffic study (Exhibit C.1 ), the Applicant submitted a traffic mitigation offer to the City of Granite Falls in the amount of $1, (or $ per lot). The City of Granite Falls was provided notice of application for this project an<:! an opportunity to comment. Comments from the City have been received (Exhibit H.1 ). The City of Granite Falls agrees to the mitigation offer proposed by the Applicant. The County has reviewed the City of Granite Falls' requested mitigation and written proposal for mitigation submitted by the Applicant and has determined that the proposed mitigation measures are reasonably related to the impacts of the development. A recommend condition has been included to require the City of Granite Falls' mitigation. H. Transportation Demand Management (TOM) (SCC ) This proposal lies outside of the Urban Growth Area (UGA). provisions of sec do not apply. Therefore, the 10. Pedestrian Facilities (RCW ) The County is required to make findings regarding safe walking conditions for school children who may reside in the subject subdivision, as well as the adequacy of pedestrian or bicycle facilities. The need for safe pedestrian facilities has been analyzed by PDS and the Lake Stevens School District. (Exhibits H.7 and I) Comments from the School District indicate that elementary, middle, and high school students residing in the proposed development will be picked up by bus at the entrance to the development. The School District has requested that a waiting area be provided for school children at the entrance to the development. The provision of a school bus waiting area has been included as a condition of approval. The School District is not requesting additional off-site pedestrian or bicycle facilities, nor does the Examiner find that any such off-site facilities are necessary. The County's current adopted County-wide Bicycle Facility System Map became effective on February 1, The subject development does not border on a right-of-way that has been identified on the adopted Bicycle Facility System Map. A bicycle path is not required. The Examiner finds that proposed facilities are consistent with the County Code, EDDS, and the rural character of the surrounding area. The Examiner further finds that no school children will be required to walk to school from the site and that the facilities will provide for the general public health, safety and welfare. 11. Mitigation for Impacts to Schools (Chapter 30.66C SCC) Chapter 30.66C SCC provides for collection of school impact mitigation fees at the time of building permit issuance based upon certified amounts in effect at that time. Pursuant to Chapter 30.66C SCC, school impact mitigation fees will be determined according to the Base Fee Schedule in effect for Lake Stevens School District No. 4, at the time of building permit submittal and collected at the time of building permit issuance for the proposed units. (ExhibitsH.7 and I) Credit is to be given for one existing lot on the subject property. Payment of school impact fees has been included as a condition of approval of the development. 6

11 12. Drainage and Grading (Chapters 30.63A and 30.63B SCC) This project is vested to the codes in effect at the time of complete permit application, which was April 9, The new Land Disturbing Activities (LOA) regulations were not in effect at that time. Therefore, the application is subject to the provisions of former Ch A SCC (Drainage Code) and Ch B (Grading Code). A. Grading. A private road will be constructed in Tract 996 as shown on the face of the plat. Lot access will be provided off this new private road. Approximately 1.53 acres of new impervious surfaces are proposed for the development, along with more than 100 cubic yards of grading. Frontage improvements also are required for this development, but less than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface is proposed in the right of way. Based on the volume of grading greater than 100 cubic yards, an LOA permit and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with Volume 2 of the 2005 DOE Stormwater Manual, are required. B. Stormwater Drainage. Stormwater quantity mitigation is proposed to be addressed by constructing a detention pond in Tract 997. Water quality is proposed to be addressed by construction a grass lined swale in Tract 999. The Applicant proposes greater than 5,000 square feet of new impervious surfaces which meets the definition of major development activity. As such, a full drainage plan is required pursuant to SCC 30.63A.120(b). Frontage improvements are required and construction plans are necessary to address work in the right-ofway. PDS Engineering staff has reviewed the concept offered and recommended approval of the project, subject to the recommended conditions which would be imposed during full drainage plan review pursuant to Chapter 30.63A SCC With the inclusion of the proposed conditions of approval, the Hearing Examiner finds that the Applicant has sufficiently demonstrated that code requirements and standards for storm water drainage, grading, water quality treatment, and construction stormwater pollution prevention can be met with development of this proposed site. Conditions have been included to require the approvals for the drainage plan, grading permit, and SWPPP. 13. Critical Areas Regulations (former Chapter SCC) Permanent wetland and buffer impacts including indirect impacts are proposed for this development. Proposed impacts are consistent with the provisions outlined in SCC 30.62A.320(2) and SCC 30.62A.340(3). Critical area impacts are proposed in disturbed pasture areas and within disturbed native scrub-shrub vegetation. The project has been designed to minimize impacts and to limit development impacts within areas that have been historically disturbed. Mitigation is proposed on site and consists of wetland and buffer creation, enhancement, buffer averaging and dedication of additional buffer. The proposed mitigation measures are consistent with mitigation ratios established by Table 3 in SCC 30.62A.320(3) for buffer impacts, and Table 4 in SCC 30.62A.340(4) for wetland impacts. A detailed analysis of wetland impacts, buffer impacts and proposed compensatory mitigation is outlined in the Impact Mitigation Table on page 14 of the Critical Area Study prepared by Wetland Resources Inc. revised April 7, 2011 (Exhibit C.3). Overall impacts for the proposed development consist of 4,780 square feet of Category Ill and Category IV wetland impacts. Total buffer impacts equal 18,517 square feet. Indirect impacts include designation of 15,300 square feet of owetland as buffer. The 7

12 Type Ns stream adjacent to 44 1 h St. NW shall be relocated due to required frontage improvements. A summary of the proposed mitigation measures include; 7,821 square feet of wetland creation, 18,081 square feet of wetland enhancement, 16,725 square feet of buffer will be enhanced and 6,593 square feet of buffer averaging pursuant to the provisions outlined in SCC 30.62A.320. Additional 48,781 square feet of buffer will be designated as a Critical Area Protection Area (CAPA) to compensate for the designation of wetland as buffer. The Type Ns stream will be placed in a more natural channel and shall be done in accordance with the approved HPA approved mitigation plan as submitted. Currently the property contains 296,934 square feet (6.82 acres) of wetland area, 230,160 square feet of buffer (6.40 acres) and two Type Ns streams. Post development the recorded CAPA for this plat shall be comprised of 304,755 square feet of wetland (6.99 acres), 278,940 square feet of buffer (6.40 acres) and two Type Ns streams. All critical areas including mitigated and enhanced areas will be established in separate tracts pursuant to SCC 30.62A.160(3) SCC and designated as Critical Area Protection Areas (CAPA) to be permanently protected pursuant to SCC 30.62A.160. Conditions have been included to implement the critical area requirements. An evaluation of the information submitted in the revised application has resulted in a determination that the application is in conformance with Chapter 30.62A SCC (Critical Areas Regulation) and is consistent with the purpose and objectives of the Chapter in regulation of development activities in critical areas to safeguard the public health, safety and welfare. Recommended conditions are included to establish the Native Growth Protection Areas (NGPA) and to provide the required NGPA protections. In addition, a condition is included to require the off-site area containing the drainage easement to be recorded in a Critical Area Site Plan (CASP) With the recommended conditions, the Hearing Examiner finds that the project complies with the requirements for the protection of Wetland and Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas provisions contained in Chapter 30.62A SCC. (Exhibits C.3) The Hearing Examiner further finds that the application is consistent with the purpose and objectives of the chapter, to safeguard the public health, safety and welfare. 14. Consistency with the GMA Comprehensive Plan. On December 21, 2005, effective February 1, 2006, the Council adopted Amended Ordinances through , through , which amended the map and text of the Snohomish County GMA Comprehensive Plan, added rural lands to UGAs and adopted area-wide rezones within the UGAs of the County, respectively. The subject property is designated Rural Residential (RR: 1 du/5 acre, Basic). The implementing zones within this designation are the Rural-5 Acre zone and other zones with a minimum lot size requirement larger than five acres. The base density of one dwelling unit per five acres (1 du/5 ac) may be increased consistent with Policy LU The proposal is consistent with the density provisions of Snohomish County's GMAbased zoning regulations under Subtitle Utilities. 8

13 A. Sewer. Sewer will be supplied by individual septic systems. The Snohomish Health District recommended approval of the preliminary plat on May 18, (Exhibit G.3) B. Electricity. The Snohomish County PUD No. 1 notified the County on April 1, 2009 that they can provide electrical service to the development. (Exhibit G.4) C. Water. Potable water will be supplied by Snohomish County PUD No. 1. A Certificate of Water Availability was provided on March 27, (Exhibit G.5) 16. International Fire Code (Chapter 30.53A SCC) Review comments were requested from Snohomish County Fire District # 8 on March 13, The District did not respond to the request. The Office of the Fire Marshal completed the review of the project on May 26, (Exhibit I) The project was recommended for approval with the following comments and recommended conditions of approval: A. Fire flow and fire hydrants shall be provided in accordance with Snohomish County Code 30.53A.514 through 30.53A Fire hydrants serving singlefamily dwellings shall have a maximum lateral spacing of 600 feet with no lot or parcel in excess of 300 feet from a hydrant. Hydrant locations shall be depicted on the face of the plat, and locations for new hydrants shall be approved by this office. B. The minimum required fire flow for this project has been determined to be 1,000 gpm at 20 psi for a 2-hour duration. Prior to final plat approval, in order to assure consistency with the applicable provisions of Snohomish County Code 30.53A.520 (16), the developer shall provide the required fire hydrants and written confirmation from the water purveyor that the minimum required fire flow of 1,000 gpm at 20 psi for a 2-hour duration can be provided. If the required fire flow cannot be provided, the new dwellings shall be provided with NFPA 13-D fire suppression systems. If there are dwellings that exceed 3,600 square feet the required fire flow shall be determined using Appendix B of the 2006 edition of the International Fire Code. C. Fire apparatus access shall not be obstructed in any manner including the parking of vehicles. Either signage or pavement striping on both sides of the access road shall be provided if the access road is less than 28' in width. Either signage or pavement striping on one side of the access road shall be provided if the road is at least 28' wide but less than 36' wide. The required signage and striping shall state "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" to ensure access availability. If pavement striping is used, then curbs are required with the curbs painted yellow with black lettering. D. Fire apparatus access as depicted meets the minimum requirements of Snohomish County Code 30.53A.512 and we have no further requirements. 17. Zoning (Chapter 30.2 SCC) This project meets zoning code requirements for lot size, including RCS provisions, bulk regulations and other zoning code requirements. (Exhibits D.1, D.2, D.3 and I) 18. State Environmental Policy Act Determination (Chapter SCC--SEPA) 9

14 PDS issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the subject application on January 6, (Exhibits E.1, E.2, F.1, F.2, F.3) Notice was properly given of the SEPA determination. /d. The DNS was not appealed. The requirements of SEPA have been met. 19. Subdivision Code (Chapter 30.41A SCC) The proposed plat also meets Chapter 30.41A SCC requirements. As conditioned, the plat will meet all SCC 30.41A.21 0 design standards for roads, except where an EDDS deviation has been approved. In addition, the subdivision meets all of the County's other transportation and road regulations and design standards. The Examiner finds that all lots as proposed are outside of all regulated flood hazard areas and that none of the lots are proposed in areas that are subject to flood, inundation or swamp conditions. (SCC 30.41A.11 0) The Fire Marshall has determined that the project will meet the County's fire regulations subject to the proposed conditions included in the PDS Staff Recommendation. (Exhibit I) Accordingly, the Hearing Examiner finds that the proposed plat, as conditioned, also meets the general requirements under Section 30.41A.1 00 with respect to health, safety and general welfare of the community. 20. Rural Cluster Subdivision Code Design Standards (Former Chapter C SCC) The subject development application is vested to the former provisions of Chapter C SCC, which was later amended by Ordinance No in November, 2009, effectively repealing and replacing the earlier regulations with new standards. The PDS staff analysis relating to the Rural Cluster Subdivision requirements set forth in Exhibit I, Pages 11 through 14 are hereby incorporated herein as if set forth in full. The Hearing Examiner has reviewed each of the criteria in former Chapter C SCC and finds that the application is consistent with its requirements. Specifically, as conditioned according to the PDS Staff Recommendation set forth in Exhibit I, the subdivision complies with the provisions of: SCC 30.41C.010 (clustering lots), sec 30.41A.200(1) (critical areas protection) SCC C.200(2) (vegetated sight-obscuring buffers), SCC 30.41C.200(3) (access roads), sec 30.41C.200(4) (utilities), SCC C.200(5) (unbuildable land), sec C.200(6) (buffers for resource land), sec 30.41C.200(7) (designated resource land disclosure statements), sec C.200(8) (mineral resource land disclosure statements), sec C.200(9) (location of open space tracts near tracts on adjacent properties). SCC C.200(1 0) (open space management plan), SCC C.200(11) (physical separation of clusters), SCC C.200(12) (lots abutting open space or buffer), SCC C.200(13) (design fits with natural features and maintains rural character), SCC 30.41C.200 (14) (no sanitary sewers absent health order), SCC C.200(15) (Location of lot clusters), SCC C.200(16) (location within fire district required), SCC C.200(17) (rural concurrency standards), and SCC C.230 and SCC C.240 (rural cluster subdivision lot yield calculations). 21. Rural Cluster Subdivision Standards-General The subject RCS application has been reviewed for conformance with the RCS standards in Chapter C SCC. The Applicant has provided the information required on an RCS 10

15 development plan and preliminary plat (Exhibits 8.1, 8.3), and an Open Space Management Plan (Exhibits A.2, A.4). The RCS application meets all of the criteria required for preliminary approval listed in SCC C.200 as further discussed in Findings of Fact 8 through 20. All utilities shall be located underground. The proposal meets requirements for restricted open space and bulk regulations, lot yield, and bonus residential density. The proposal complies with the provisions of SCC C.01 0 by clustering the lots on the most buildable and least environmentally sensitive portion of the site while retaining over 50% of the property in restricted open space; the proposal is considered preferable to traditional lot-by-lot development through its efficient use of the most buildable portion of the site together with the retention of environmentally sensitive areas in permanent open space tracts; the use of the clustering concept provides greater compatibility with the surrounding development by providing buffers between adjoining properties; the use of the clustering concept has reduced the need for impervious surfaces resulting in the protection of groundwater and potential water pollution from erosion and other drainage related problems; the project complies with critical areas regulations, thereby minimizing the loss of the County's environmentally sensitive areas. 22. Plats- Subdivisions -Dedications (Chapter RCW) The subdivision has been reviewed for conformance with criteria established by RCW ,.110,.120, and.195. The criteria require that the plat conform with applicable zoning ordinances and comprehensive plans, and make appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and other planning features including safe pedestrian facilities for students. The proposed subdivision conforms generally with the development regulations of the UDC. There is open space provided within the subdivision. The single-family homes within the subdivision will be in character with the rural area. Provisions for adequate drainage have been made in the conceptual plat design which indicates that the final design can conform to Chapter 30.63A SCC and Chapter 30.63C SCC The plat, as conditioned, will conform to Chapters 30.66A, and 30.66C SCC, satisfying County requirements with respect to parks and recreation, traffic, roads and walkway design standards, and school mitigation. Adequate drinking water will be provided by the PUD and sewage disposal will be provided by individual wastewater septic systems. 23. Any Finding of Fact in this Decision, which should be deemed a Conclusion of Law, is hereby adopted as such. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The Examiner has original jurisdiction over RCS applications pursuant to Chapter SCC and Chapter 2.02 SCC. 2. The Examiner must review the proposed RCS application under RCW , the legal standard for approval of a preliminary subdivision. The Examiner must find that: 11

16 The proposed subdivision complies with the established criteria therein and makes the appropriate provisions for public, health, safety and general welfare, for open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and school grounds, and other planning features including safe walking conditions for students... RCW The Examiner concludes the Applicant has met its burden in showing the established criteria have been met. The proposal is consistent with the state subdivision statute, the GMACP; GMA-based County codes, the type and character of land use permitted on the project site, the permitted density and applicable design and development standards. 3. Given the information provided in the record and the Findings of Fact made above, the Examiner also concludes that the Applicant has met its burden in showing that the RCS application meets the requirements of Chapter C and should be approved as described in that Chapter. 4. Adequate public services exist to serve this proposal. 5. If approved with the recommended conditions, the proposal will make adequate provisions for the public health, safety, and general welfare. 6. Any Conclusion of Law in this Decision, which should be deemed a Finding of Fact, is hereby adopted as such. DECISION Pursuant to the Examiner's authority under SCC and (2), the application for preliminary plat approval of a RURAL CLUSTER SUBDIVISION is hereby GRANTED subject to the following CONDITIONS: CONDITIONS A. The preliminary plat received by PDS on December 21, 2011 (Exhibit 8.1) shall be the approved plat configuration. Changes to the approved plat are governed by sec 30.41A.330. B. Prior to initiation of any site work; and/or prior to issuance of any development/construction permits by the county: i. All site development work shall comply with the requirements of the plans and permits approved pursuant to Condition A, above. 12

17 ii. iii. iv. The platter shall mark with temporary markers in the field the boundary of all Critical Area Protection Areas (CAPA) required by Chapter 30.62A SCC, or the limits of the proposed site disturbance outside of the CAPA, using methods and materials acceptable to the County. A final mitigation plan based on the Mitigation Plan - Thomas Shire Estates as prepared by Wetland Resources, Inc. dated April 7, 2011, and date stamped received by PDS on April 11, 2011 (Exhibit C.3) shall be submitted for review and approval during the construction review phase of this project. Construction plans and a Full Drainage Plan shall be submitted for review and approval. v. A Land Disturbing Activities (LOA) permit shall be obtained, including the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). C. The following additional restrictions and/or language shall be indicated on the face of the final plat: i. "The dwelling units within this development are subject to park impact fees in the amount of $1, (Centennial # 306) per newly approved dwelling unit pursuant to Chapter 30.66A SCC. Payment of these mitigation fees is required prior to building permit issuance; provided that the building permit has been issued within five years after the application is deemed complete. After five years, park impact fees shall be based upon the rate in effect at the time of building permit issuance." ii. iii. "Chapter SCC requires the new lot mitigation payments in the amounts shown below for a single-family residence or twice the amount shown for a duplex: $3, per lot for mitigation of impacts on County roads paid to the County. Credit for certain expenditures may be allowed against said payments to the extent authorized by County code. Any reduction of the per-lot amount shall be documented in the RECORDS OF DEVELOPER OBLIGATIONS FORM. $ per lot for mitigation of impacts on City streets for the City of Granite Falls paid to the City. Proof of payment of the above amount shall be provided to the County. These payments are due prior to or at the time of building permit issuance for each single-family residence. Notice of these mitigation payments shall be contained in any deeds involving this subdivision or the lot[s] therein." "The lots within this subdivision will be subject to school impact mitigation fees for the Lake Stevens School District No. 4 to be determined by the certified amount within the Base Fee Schedule in effect at the time of building permit application, and to be collected prior to building permit issuance, in accordance with the provisions of SCC 30.66C Credit shall be given for one existing parcel. Lot 1 shall receive credit." 13

18 iv. All Critical Areas shall be designated Critical Area Protection Area (CAPA) in accordance with Section 30.62A.160 sec containing the following restrictive language; "In consideration of Snohomish County Code requirements, except as otherwise provided herein, the CAPA (Critical Area Protection Area) shall be left permanently undisturbed in a substantially natural state. No clearing, grading, filling, building construction, or placement, or road construction of any kind shall occur within said CAPA, except the allowed activities set forth in Snohomish County Code (30.62A.01 0(2), 30.62A.51 0, 30.62A.530) when approved by the County." v. "Agricultural uses are proposed within open space Tracts 995 and 999 of the development. A minimum of a 25-foot buffer is required from lot property lines for plowing, tilling, mowing, and placement of small gardens. A minimum of a 50-foot buffer is required from lot property lines for livestock, including barns, livestock in pastures, and placement of manure." vi. "Lots within a rural cluster subdivision or short subdivision, and adjacent to or within 1,300 feet of agricultural or forestry uses located in a designated open space tract may be subject to inconvenience or discomforts arising from agricultural or forestry activities, including but not limited to noise, odors, fumes, dust, smoke, the operation of machinery of any kind, timber harvest, brush control, the storage and disposal of manure, the application by spraying or otherwise of chemical and organic fertilizers, soil amendments, herbicides and pesticides, hours of operation, and other agricultural or forestry activities." vii. Fire flow and fire hydrants shall be provided in accordance with Snohomish County Code 30.53A.514 through 30.53A Fire hydrants serving singlefamily dwellings shall have a maximum lateral spacing of 600 feet with no lot or parcel in excess of 300 feet from a hydrant. Hydrant locations shall be depicted on the face of the plat, and locations for new hydrants shall be approved by this office. viii. "The minimum required fire flow for this project has been determined to be 1,000 gpm at 20 psi for a 2-hour duration. Prior to final plat approval, in order to assure consistency with the applicable provisions of Snohomish County Code 30.53A.520(16), the developer shall provide the required fire hydrants and written confirmation from the water purveyor that the minimum required fire flow of 1,000 gpm at 20 psi for a 2-hour duration can be provided. If the required fire flow cannot be provided, the new dwellings shall be provided with NFPA 13-D fire suppression systems. If there are dwellings that exceed 3,600 square feet the required fire flow shall be determined using Appendix B of the 2006 edition of the International Fire Code." ix. "Fire apparatus access shall not be obstructed in any manner including the parking of vehicles. Either signage or pavement striping on both sides of the access road shall be provided if the access road is less than 28' in width. Either 14

19 signage or pavement striping on one side of the access road shall be provided if the road is at least 28' wide but less than 36' wide. The required signage and striping shall state "NO PARKING- FIRE LANE" to ensure access availability. If pavement striping is used, then curbs are required with the curbs painted yellow with black lettering." x. "The approved Landscape Plan for the Sight Obscuring Buffers, including maintenance, shall be fully implemented by the Homeowner's Association." xi. xii. xiii. "The approved Open Space Management Plan, including maintenance, shall be fully implemented by the Homeowner's Association." "All utilities shall be placed underground." Appropriate right-of-way shall be dedicated to the County to establish a 30-foot right-of-way width from the right-of-way centerline on the development's side of the right-of-way. D. Prior to recording of the final plat: 1. Rural frontage improvements shall be constructed along the parcel's frontage on 44 1 h St. NE to the satisfaction of the County. ii. A waiting area shall be provided at the entrance to the development to the satisfaction of the County. iii. Critical Area Protection Area boundaries (CAPA) shall have been permanently marked on the site prior to final inspection by the County, with both CAPA signs and adjacent markers which can be magnetically located (e.g.: rebar, pipe, 20 penny nails, etc.). The Applicant may use other permanent methods and materials provided they are first approved by the County. Where a CAPA boundary crosses another boundary (e.g.: lot, tract, plat, road, etc.), a rebar marker with surveyors' cap and license number must be placed at the line crossing. iv. CAPA signs shall have been placed no greater than 100 feet apart around the perimeter of the CAPA. Minimum placement shall include one Type 1 sign per critical area feature, and at least one Type 1 sign shall be placed in any lot that borders CAPA, unless otherwise approved by the County biologist. The design and proposed locations for the CAPA signs shall be submitted to the Land Use Division for review and approval prior to installation. v. The Final Mitigation Plan shall have been implemented, completed and inspected by PDS. vi. A Land Use Binder for the Interim Open Space shall be recorded with the County Auditor. 15

20 Nothing in this approval excuses the applicant, owner, lessee, agent, successor or assigns from compliance with any other federal, state or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project. Preliminary plats which are approved by the County are valid for seven (7) years from the date of approval and must be recorded within that time period unless an extension has been properly requested and granted pursuant to sec A.300. Decision issued this 5 1 h day of March, Millie Examiner Judge, Hearing EXPLANATION OF RECONSIDERATION AND APPEAL PROCEDURES The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final and conclusive with right of appeal to the County Council. However, reconsideration by the Examiner may also be sought by one or more parties of record. The following paragraphs summarize the reconsideration and appeal processes. For more information about reconsideration and appeal procedures, please see Chapter SCC and the respective Examiner and Council Rules of Procedure. Reconsideration Any party of record may request reconsideration by the Examiner within 10 days from the date of this decision. A petition for reconsideration must be filed in writing with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, 2nd Floor, Robert J. Drewel Building, 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, Everett, Washington, (Mailing Address: M/S No. 405, 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, Everett WA 98201) on or before March 15, There is no fee for filing a petition for reconsideration. "The petitioner for reconsideration shall mail or otherwise provide a copy of the petition for reconsideration to all parties of record on the date of filing." [SCC ] A petition for reconsideration does not have to be in a special form but must: contain the name, mailing address and daytime telephone number of the petitioner, together with the signature of the petitioner or of the petitioner's attorney, if any; identify the specific findings, conclusions, actions and/or conditions for which reconsideration is requested; state the relief requested; and, where applicable, identify the specific nature of any newly discovered evidence and/or changes proposed by the Applicant. 16

21 The grounds for seeking reconsideration are limited to the following: (a) (b) (c) The Hearing Examiner exceeded the Hearing Examiner's jurisdiction; The Hearing Examiner failed to follow the applicable procedure in reaching the Hearing Examiner's decision; The Hearing Examiner committed an error of law; (d) The Hearing Examiner's findings, conclusions and/or conditions are not supported by the record; (e) New evidence which could not reasonably have been produced and which is material to the decision is discovered; or (f) The Applicant proposed changes to the application in response to deficiencies identified in the decision. Petitions for reconsideration will be processed and considered by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to the provisions of SCC Please include the County file number in any correspondence regarding this case. Appeal An appeal to the County Council may be filed by any aggrieved party of record within 14 days from the date of this decision. Where the reconsideration process of SCC has been invoked, no appeal may be filed until the reconsideration petition has been disposed of by the hearing examiner. An aggrieved party need not file a petition for reconsideration but may file an appeal directly to the County Council. If a petition for reconsideration is filed, issues subsequently raised by that party on appeal to the County Council shall be limited to those issues raised in the petition for reconsideration. Appeals shall be addressed to the Snohomish County Council but shall be filed in writing with the Department of Planning and Development Services, 2nd Floor, County Administration-East Building, 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, Everett, Washington (Mailing address: M/S No. 604, 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, Everett, WA 98201) on or before March 19, 2012, and shall be accompanied by a filing fee in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each appeal filed; PROVIDED, that the fee shall not be charged to a department of the County. The filing fee shall be refunded in any case where an appeal is summarily dismissed in whole without hearing under SCC An appeal must contain the following items in order to be complete: a detailed statement of the grounds for appeal; a detailed statement of the facts upon which the appeal is based, including citations to specific Hearing Examiner findings, conclusions, exhibits or oral testimony; written arguments in support of the appeal; the name, mailing address and daytime telephone number of each appellant, together with the signature of at least one of the appellants or of the attorney for the appellant(s), if any; the name, 17

22 mailing address, daytime telephone number and signature of the appellant's agent or representative, if any; and the required filing fee. The grounds for filing an appeal shall be limited to the following: (a) The decision exceeded the Hearing Examiner's jurisdiction; (b) The Hearing Examiner failed to follow the applicable procedure in reaching his decision; (c) The Hearing Examiner committed an error of law; or (d) The Hearing Examiner's findings, conclusions and/or conditions are not supported by substantial evidence in the record. [SCC ] Appeals will be processed and considered by the County Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter SCC. Please include the County file number in any correspondence regarding the case. Staff Distribution: Department of Planning and Development Services: Ed Caine The following statement is provided pursuant to RCW : "Affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation." A copy of this Decision is being provided to the Snohomish County Assessor as required by RCW

23 Snohomish County Department of Planning and Development Services John Lovick, County Executive Clay White, Director 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, M/S 604 Everett, Washington (0) (F) DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES A Minor Revision to the Preliminary Plat of Thomashire Estates PFN PSD August 11, 2015 Land Resolutions Ry McDutTy 3605 Colby Ave Everett. W A Mr. McDuffy: On June 8, 2015, a minor revision was requested to accommodate construction and septic design changes to the Preliminary Plat of Thomashire Estates. Further clarification of the minor revision was provided to Planning and Development Services (PDS) on August 5, 2015 detailing a request to add a tract for drainage. The subdivision was originally approved by the Hearing Examiner in a Decision dated March I. FINDINGS OFF ACT 1. Lots 3 through 8 remain unchanged. 2. A new tract (Tract 994) will be added to the plat for the purposes of onsite drainage. 3. The location of Lot 1 is adjusted to make room for Tract 999 through consolidation. but the lot remains at 20,000 square feet. 4. Tract 995, an open space tract, is slightly adjusted with a reduction in square footage from 23,923 to

24 Minor R~vision to the Preliminary Plat ofthomashire Estates PFN: PSD Tu~sday. August I L 2015! Author: Stephen A. Fcsl~r 5. Tract 999, an open space tract is slightly adjusted and will consist of an enlarged private drainage easement. 6. The shape of Lot 2 is adjusted slightly, but remains at 20,000 square feet 7. The existing house. accessory structures, and drainfield are no long proposed to remain. 8. Site calculations before and after the minor revision: Before After Lot 1 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Lot 2 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Lot 3 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Lot 4 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Lot 5 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Lot 6 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Lot 7 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Tract 994 (Drainage) N/A 6,743 sf Tract 995 (Open Space)! 23,928 sf 22,213 sf Tract 996 (Private Road) 33,195 sf 33,195 sf Tract 997 (Detention) 13,009 sf 14,046 sf Tract 998 (Open Space/CAP A) 561,961 sf 563,645 sf Tract 999 (Open Space) 39,342 sf 31,593 sf Total Gross Site Area : 831,435 sf 831,435sf Average Lot Size 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Smallest Lot Size 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Open Space (Tracts 995 & 999) 63,270 sf 53,806 sf Percent of Gross Site Area 7.6% 6.5% Interim Open Space (Tract 998) 561,961 sf 563,645 sf Percent of Gross Site Area 67.6% 67.8% Drainage/Detention (Tracts 994 & 997) 13,009 sf 20,789 sf Percent of Gross Site Area 1.6% 2.5% Required Interim Open Space 375,158 sf 375,158 sf I II. CONCLUSIONS 1. The subdivision will meet the open space requirements required from the original approval. 2. No lot will exceed the maximum lot size for a rural cluster subdivision in the Rural to Urban Transition Area. 3. All critical area protection areas are unchanged from the original approval. 4. Access and road circulation are not changing from the original approval. 5. The minor revision to Thomashire Estates is in compliance with regulatory requirements. Page 2

25 :VIinor Revision to the Preliminary Plat ofthomashire Estates PFX I-PSO Tuesday. August I I I Author: Stephen A. Fesler Ill. DECISION After reviewing the facts of the case, the Minor Revision to the Preliminary Plat of Thomashire Estates is hereby APPROVED with conditions. The following conditions are amended, as indicated. with underline to denote new language and strikethrough to remove language. Conditions as revised: A. The preliminary plat received by PDS on December 21.?0 11 (Exhibit B.1) June shall be the approved plat configuration. Changes to the approved plat are governed by SCC 30.41A.330. No other condition contained in the March Hearing Examiner Decision is modified by this decision. Decision issued this 11th day of August Stephen A. Fesler. Planner On behalf of Clay White. Director Department of Planning and Development Services Snohomish County Page 3

26 MEMORANDUM June 15, 2015 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Caine, Senior Planner Planning and Development Services Mark A. Brown, Engineer Ill Planning and Development Services, Transportation Engineering Section File No SO Thomas Shire Estates Revised Impact Fee Road System Impact Fee [SCC ] The City of Lake Stevens Southwest Annexation, effective December 31, 2009, resulted in the unusual circumstance of removing a significant number of the impact fee projects listed in the TNR Appendix D Impact Fee Cost Basis used in determining the road system impact fee within TSA B. This reduction resulted in the maximum road system impact fee that can be charged in TSA B being significantly reduced. To fairly impose the required Road System Impact Fee for this specific development, the Director of Public Works, in accordance with SCC 30.66B.31 0(1 )(a), has adjusted the amount of the Road System Impact Fee in SCC 30.66B.330 from $(397.00) to $( ) per ADT. 1. The developments "new" average ADT (Line 3- Line 4): TSA B ADT amount for residential developments outside the X~ UGA: $ Road system impact fee for this development (Line 5 X Line 6): = $26, $ Less TOM credit of 5%: 0 5. Total Snohomish County Road System Impact Fee: (Line 7 $26, Line 8) $ Amount to be paid per SFR $3, $ These figures do not include credit for on-site TOM measures. Consistent with SCC 30.66B.340, payment of this road system impact is required prior to building permit issuance. Final Recommendations: The PDS Transportation Section and the Department of Public Works have no objections to the approval of the subject Rural Cluster Subdivision as shown on the preliminary plat received by PDS on March 8, 2011, provided the following conditions are imposed: Items to be shown on the face of the final recorded Plat:

27 "Chapter SCC requires the new lot mitigation payments in the amounts shown below for a single-family residence or twice the amount shown for a duplex: $3, $1, per lot for mitigation of impacts on County roads paid to the County (Transaction Code 5208). Credit for certain expenditures may be allowed against said payments to the extent authorized by County code. Any reduction of the per lot amount shall be documented in the RECORDS OF DEVELOPER OBLIGATIONS FORM. $ per lot for mitigation of impacts on City streets for the City of Granite Falls paid to the City. Proof of payment of the above amount shall be provided to the County. These payments are due prior to or at the time of building permit issuance for each singlefamily residence. Notice of these mitigation payments shall be contained in any deeds involving this subdivision or the lot[s] therein. Once building permits have been paid for and issued all mitigation payments shall be deemed paid by PDS." Prior to Recording: Rural frontage improvements shall be constructed along the parcel's frontage on 44th St NE to the satisfaction of the County. A waiting area shall be provided at the entrance to the development to the satisfaction of the County. cc: Maria Dobson-Schmidt, DPW Thomas Shire Estates SD 06/15/15 Page 2

28 LOG NUMBERS BGT. EXECUTIVE/COUNCIL APPROVAL FORM MANAGEMENT ROUTING: TO: COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON: EXECUTIVE John Lovick SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL EXEC. DIR. DEPARTMENT DIY. MGR. DIVISION ORIGINATOR Stephen Clifton DIRECTOR/ELECTED Clay White b..._.~< ( ~ E~UTIVE RECOMMENDATION: Planning & Dev Serv. Mike McCrary \,,...,. &.r ""'' Division Manager --71'47'~~ted Renee Richards ~ DATE 10-l'l-ls' EXT ~ Approve No Recommendation Further Processing DOCUMENT TYPE: BUDGET ACTION: Emergency Appropriation Supplemental Appropriation Budget Transfer CONTRACT: New Amendment DOCUMENT I AGENDA TITLE: Motion to approve the final plat of Thomashire Estates File Number: FSD Received at Council Office X GRANT APPLICATION ORDINANCE Amendment to Ord. # PLAN OTHER Motion to Approve APPROVAL AUTHORITY: HANDLING: NORMAL EXPEDITE X PURPOSE: Final Plat Approval EXECUTIVE CITE BASIS URGENT SCC 30.41A.640 COUNCIL DEADLINE DATE X BACKGROUND: Plat Name: Thomas Shire Estates RCS Location: h Street NE, Lake Stevens General Policy Plan: Rural Residential-5 within the Rural to Urban Transition Area Overaly Zoning: R-5 Acreage: Number of Lots: 8 Average Lot Size: 20,000 square feet Hearing Examiner Approval: HE Decision dated 5 March 2012, Minor Revision dated 11 August 2015, Traffic Memo dated 11 June 2015

29 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: EXPEND: FUND, AGY, ORG, ACTY, OBJ, AU CURRENTYR 2NDYR 1ST 6 YRS I TOTAL 0 REVENUE: FUND AGY ORG REV SOURCE CURRENTYR 2NDYR IST 6 YRS I TOTAL 0 DEPARTMENT FISCAL IMPACT NOTES: BUDGET REVIEW: Analyst~ Administrator CONTRACT INFORMATION: ORIGINAL AMENDMENT CONTRACT CONTRACT # # CONTRACT PERIOD: ORIGINAL AMENDMENT Start Start CONTRACT I PROJECT TITLE: End End AMOUNT AMOUNT Recommend Approval $ $ CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS (City/State only): APPROVED: RISK MANAGEMENT No --- OlMMFNTS PROSECUTING ATTY- AS TO FORM: Yes V\j '--- No OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW I COMMENTS: '~ 2

30 FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST PLAT NAME: File Number: Thomas hire Estates FSD Date Completed 1. Current Plat Name Reservation Letter 27 August Health District Approval Memo 2 July Sewer Purveyor Approval Letter 2 July Water Purveyor Approval Letter 15 October PUD Approval Letter 23 February Surveyor's Seal (on bluelines/mylar) 30 September Treasurer's Signature (on mylar) 13 October DPW Signature (on mylar) 16 October Fire Marshall Approval Memo 12 October Site Visit (planner) 8 Ocotober Frontage improvements shall have been constructed along 44 1 h St NE. 9 October A waiting area shall be provided at the entrance of the development. 9 October The CAPA shall be appropriately marked and signed in the field. 90ctober The final mitigation plan shall have been fully implemented. 9 October 2015 COUNTY SIGNATURES I certify that all conditions of approval have been met; those not met are bonded: NAME: ~ DATE: /0.-ZZ- ( 5-

31 Sl(f)+Z (!) :;;: r- (Q ~ [ ~ (!) 0 m! ::I r i c. (jj m (") "' ~ -o "' "' z ;u <0 m a> m 0 <0...>. 0...>. (;.) Q) (;.) rn DUPLICATE Exhibit Number: 01 PFN: SO

32 ZIP CODE EXT AREA CODE ZIP CODE EXT ZIP CODE '"" ~ CODE I EXT ~~~~ CODE 'CODE ~~~~ ~6~~

33 Richards, Renee From: Sent: To: Subject: Richards, Renee Friday, October 16, :34AM Plat of Thomashire Estates This is to provide you Notice of a Public Meeting for Final Plat Approval. You are receiving this notice because you provided comments when this plat began the final plat process. The plat of Thomashire, PFN OS , is scheduled for a public meeting before Snohomish County Council on November 4, This meeting takes place at 9 AM in the Henry M Jackson board room on the gth floor of the Robert J Drewel Building. The address is 3000 Rockefeller Ave, Everett. Public comment is allowed at this meeting and is limited to whether or not the applicants have met conditions required in Hearing Examiner's Decision for the approved preliminary plat. ReV\..ee RLd11Arcls./As.s.oe-. PLIAV\..V\..er Sll'vOVJOV'vtlS.Vl COUV\..t!j PDS 425-3gg-331_1_ ext rell\..te. r~e-v1ci rcls.@s.v\..oe-o.org PDS Customer Service Hours 8- noon and 1-4 Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday 10-noon and 1-4Thursday NOTICE: All s, and attachments, sent to and from Snohomish County are public records and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the Public Records Act (RCW 42.56) 1

34 Richards, Renee From: To: Sent: Subject: Friday, October 16, :34AM Undeliverable: Plat of Thomashire Estates Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: This message was rejected by the recipient system. Please check the recipient's address and try resending this message, or contact the recipient directly. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: BL2PR04MB193.namprd04.prod.outlook.com #< # smtp; RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup> #SMTP# Original message headers: Received: from BLUPR0401CA0030.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ( ) by BL2PR04MB193.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ( ) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id ; Fri, 16 Oct :34: Received: from BN1AFF011FD024.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c10::161) by BLUPR0401CA0030.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:525a::40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Oct :34: Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=co.snohomish.wa.us; windemere.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;windemere.com; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=co.snohomish.wa.us; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of co.snohomish.wa.us designates as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip= ; helo=naol-bn l-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; Received: from naol-bnl-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ( ) by BN1AFF011FD024.mail.protection.outlook.com ( ) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Oct :34: Received: from BLUPR09CA0017.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ( ) by BLUPR09MB015l.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ( ) with Microsoft SMTP

35 Server (TLS) id ; Fri, 16 Oct :34: Received: from BL2FF011FD042.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c09::152) by BLUPR09CA0017.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:8b7::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Oct :34: Authentication-Results: spf=softfail (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=co.snohomish.wa.us; windemere.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;windemere.com; dmarc=none action=none header. from=co.snohomish. wa. us; Received-SPF: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning co.snohomish.wa.us discourages use of as permitted sender) Received: from PMC-Exch2013.co.snohomish.wa.us ( ) by BL2FF011FD042.mail.protection.outlook.com ( ) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Oct :34: Received: from PMC-Exch2013.co.snohomish.wa.us ( ) by PMC-Exch2013.co.snohomish.wa.us ( ) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id ; Fri, 16 Oct :34: Received: from PMC-EXCH-HT2.co.snohomish.wa.us ( ) by PMC-Exch2013.co.snohomish.wa.us ( ) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Oct :34: Received: from PCR-EXCH-MB8.co.snohomish.wa.us ([fe80::acc3:bf18:7ecf:de5b]) by PMC-Exch-HT2.co.snohomish.wa.us ([fe80::a943:a164:7ed6:5a06%10]) with mapi id ; Fri, 16 Oct :34: From: "Richards, Renee" To: Subject: Plat of Thoma shire Estates Thread-Topic: Plat ofthomashire Estates Thread-Index: AdEIJWHUE1AOVFDETYi6kK6q6+dmrw== Date: Fri, 16 Oct :34: Message-10: Accep~Language: en-us Content-Language: en-us X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TN EF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [ ] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7e244d9c1ad60647bc817968f295de732coddc02pcrexchmb8cosno_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: Renee. Rich a rds@co.snohomish. wa. us X-EOPAttributedMessage: 1 X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics-untrusted: 1;BL2FF011FD042;1:SqPA8faNpSdFJWHBFtwYTkz2UnU5MpcvQtSzkayVU3o/ZFcpjySjDW4E2142VLseiOq3PnxUam/HP38F VDcQDKrsT204TET8U5H+w6VhJjDHkaQG41DoR4QvmBVpfSW/JM6RPAhMgGw8HGpfpccUKoyALA7kori6z61g1aPU7BpiH snvk2tipn4dkujrx2uwvvoaesc60y9ra2laih386pxjstab6pvlggxao7mbwsgnjkryderp36z49+nzmocysdvxtm1vry8px ENiqVhPtP/KUtebuHP9oiPiOehE946nOSyZkpKeVCfTiWcwHY9N8ailgxKtoefWePJjyorWDw== X-Forefront -Antispam-Report-U ntrusted: CIP: ;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:( )( )( )(189002)( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )( ) ( )( )( )( )( )( )(8 2

36 )( )( )( )( )( )(491001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:l;SRVR:BLUPRO 9MB0151;H:PMC-Exch2013.co.snohomish.wa.us;FPR:;SPF:SoftFaii;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;MX:l;A:l;LANG:en; X-M icrosoft -Excha nge-diagnostics-u ntrusted: l;blupr09mb0151;2:7g4yrmeqrti5z/cg9sjipvpwiveybsjydyikhotv8s3of8nwi5yljbogrjckxotpq7ul5ycjvybvjwrlmgk DLpi61hP29CePOpr0zJQObA4Gdyr90x+92awP40W7Xt/Sbc6g7d2zhiTGuBOeUSU7Tbqhl205f0+5WLsi8DqysbA=;3:1FpCN2 qln01cmmissjodb7fykqox3/0guafecubcd3one8mbrf/qaqjhwrt42e2v8ckl69h5uyz9dgneuylkijjzwoy2+vlrpexcx/ +GnFsuMQOkoevAor+mrukHUU22F8ZRJYkNkyM1GMU9QC71EDwYKGwjfiPNMN7011CvN2aXCU8RZoMluNJTLjOX+SAJc/ HsUoGa jm4nx19 N F /3M7zCku PHc65nM BhOksiAC4=;25: K4+ TG RuA/H DpKhVPZ2G PrFbn K9V+wXum2XH imgm ipbv /xtgirl TER3eznldWnTFSU1RWaQVSLX9EBwGTDKZsOu/DCqTYwj70z12WTBeHOSkSFy5hxXKiZSTIHATeclroPkTfoaanxeMxKH3m gnj7s6w8vbbbat5jnvoq9m4tebbcjgzczcu/1rrfkryeoumsf/annsj+ycae9k061xtbxgye3kiv8bmzzvbupnmpbxyttzadag7 uygvlsefte41z6lq/zeknk4v8lfb4jdxpbw== X-M icrosoft-antispa m-u ntrusted: U risca n :; BCL:O; PCL:O; RULE I D:;SRVR: BLU PR09M B0151; X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics-untrusted: l;blupr09mb0151;20:utkhjs9jh6vuodfogbsralppjqvkbjuvfevch9mwbrigeigwrvgcbn2gjw+/20ub9y7w9ssz7vm3 qmf3noe2xyimqivynaanltvacz6rseqvuup04v8skgl7cuuszdak1ewnuglxm991ev7nhpwfteirctlidt5txlgpm50xdb8pc DMF7u7JCUbGyjJUDCnUGS6pWZql73rNFf21c84qkdMOMre07nT7904mz3HzQjpoQq9Efc3YIMS4rPKH7Dn0q+LDcSqo21c DPDndlpr2r7x51dzNYAFh3F811FGMPc15DwXOIKUO/g4y9HyKc4KJMlrc7/aZOOUGdpyQ8a81cAft8ZN4BiSWONFL6LFLYev5 OdZNzizd Ey /9bKMs8w7 BTm DWQ6m371eE7KNJ loe Uaa4 YpdQq BQ2AIJ ux5qac4+i0n9g RGcXRrgyJ lza I L Ygv AtiQ+ 7YctP9Kw wkcoaesbyswq+luxwyylpg03c12nk8iqwloyust043rkhxutllx;4:uoxqynoeozhfob4vuotclgzdjpiz3xhxn3t71enaabd rkmfo7sa6jkcq/b513jemzzc+61qg5t7pf8ee6siriiu37f4a8cjlhud9t5ubwsxeiotx6qn8iuv21derqhjsjkzzkbloqfiwobuspa ty3ridnmn5102pphwrnse91s1gnnzmuigizm2mdeks5ak6+zdg2dnalmbkatymndk7h86gcgsgla+plcgoa8o9klqz5fs5g i7+kzbeit9cs5fpaumzlgithhiii3+0yhdchemrrdov3hq6xm5wlolzwoiktbdubxatkdy4cjkolexp5mcbjtbiejb90enl8didx 7bU6LfhB5ouK91eHVwQfeY= X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <BLUPR09MB015198DBA78AD78F64CA231DE13DO@BLUPR09MB015l.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> X -Excha nge-antispam-report-test: UriScan:( )( )( )( ); X-Excha nge-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:O;PCL:O;RULEID:(601004)( )(520078)( )( }( };SRVR:BLUPR09MB0151;BCL:O;PCL:O; RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR09MB0151; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0731AA2DE6 X-M icrosoft-excha nge-diagnostics-u ntrusted: =?usascii?q?l;blupr09mb0151;23:qnuqwvxabfzzytv5u41f913u4skjz12oi9y2g069f?= =?us-ascii?q?vrllaquobqx/o+nillwlkyz9ixjbdmf/j6j3mwot9cp7wa8hgnqxlvfpwydb?= =?us-ascii?q? Dvl BfOCSXQFtObSTCqm IOikY9wlaxlqeSm8q ufps FMycBLKfD6Z9XlE+W+ 1M?= =?us-ascii?q?7 AKNGJW2 Ev8ci R BZjztvxhAvbfj M9QwYJc6Zl tegix8m LcCgS nk6n i lcugd9?= =?us-a sci i?q? ae PCf8 FeOBH E LSrfsM E7 afk9 /21 On u60t4rkidxu hqwozcd /BoXwwN9 UgAaC?= =?us-ascii?q?tdxvk4tevpclxkrd LHrlyydXBZzBSY I /QkkyrGqKsmilzl vpnridp2beqmgm?= =?us-ascii?q? H RWDx51Zp6Zie YKAiAijde Fc61 MYXAaZifq4qCEq01qjoGTBaO+j 117VCXPw?= =?us-ascii?q?gyzbzwohcrugkfmss07naw8wzrt/vrairq6fn95nvbjowupoab1gvjneti/p?= =?us-ascii?q?vzf77slgf8kgmpuowoca8faeaswvtk5ckggsd41ru2nnejeibfy5pryclfwt?= =?us-ascii?q?+ujc84t8sss8yl vrcj lkv 4ajagrjjl uxjtyrira UX12 B/8a KuY96xHV J9r40?= =?us-asci i?q?gxpq Sd+CSVCJ E G bwws+s8cfp3 Fw+N U kd Pf ArDoZBuzsLDBsu bo u U9+wT es52?= =?us-ascii?q?opn YFd04aX5ysT /P2 nnzbhffh bbcmj LllgtpE/iko YSluyPjq pd mqj FE72Xu?= =? us-ascii?q?ti ros7 a E I KlXa YS byt/so P71429 p9xb2 fwtugq Y s2 B3TN4aAe pp FMOw4+Qpv?= =?us-ascii?q?mht26neplokagrsopoxqqkxiboazzn/713z7yjm+d/bh/oxomz+iauoly800?= =?us-ascii?q?/5joij/biap50y/wvddeoiuiov+q0vfk61df4xtlx4nbptmkd+yqhgosfmgj?= =?us-ascii?q?dbeudm27qllglab5pof6dii32awva3amjk6snmnucohdhbqpqu3qiso/z7er?= =? us-ascii?q?zd Ux6VZJ928u PuJ3a/5u Eb9icl En61a rbhtk8lol + TiR68pln EO jm puyivrg?= =?us-ascii?q?yawgvwxnhdulqffv8hhwn/jl56samofuy+ox4ifzpy/z9mpggrfktiimradb?= =?us-asci i?q?yvwrq e YX N M 4i4grfFh I pgvs tm/e 6n LE pq9 rong KQq N P k IZp Lfn/ zu LsQckid?= =?us-ascii?q?cj+sdsekg4hoy8kxh mq uap9m+y6omypm+dysmvflqua T3oXW q8u pms2 ujvtb?= 3