CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

Transcription

1 City and County of Broomfield, Colorado To: From: Prepared by: Applicant Owner Property Size Property Location: Mayor and City Council Charles Ozaki, City and County Manager Kevin Standbridge, Deputy City and County Manager David Shinneman, Community Development Director John Hilgers, Planning Director Alice Hanson, Senior Planner Meeting Date Agenda Item # June 16, Agenda Title Flatiron Office Ventures, LLC Flatiron Office Ventures, LLC 4.14 Acres CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM Concept Review Summit Office Park Amendment Summary Proposed Plan Data Applicable Prior Plan Reviews/ Approvals Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation for Property Current Zoning Current Land Use Proposed Land Use Adjacent Zoning & Land Use The concept proposal is to reconfigure the final building in the development to accommodate both office and residential use. The currently approved two-story office building would become one floor of office space and three floors of residences (12 to 18 units) with parking added on the north side of the building. June 30, 1998, City Council approved the MidCities Planned Unit Development Plan (PUD) and Preliminary Plat with Resolution No January 9, 2001, The property was annexed into Broomfield with the adoption of Ordinance No January 9, 2001, City Council approved the MidCities PUD Plan and Preliminary Plat Second Amendment which expanded the PUD area in a westerly direction with Resolution No June 12, 2007, City Council approved a Final Plat, Site Development Plan (SDP), and subdivision improvement agreement for the Summit Office Park development with Resolution No Mixed-Use Commercial Planned Unit Development Of the four buildings in Summit Office Park, two are complete, one is under construction, and one is the subject of this memo. Office and Residential North PUD Bank and Restaurant South PUD Lakeshore Athletic Club East PUD Undeveloped West PUD RockVue Apartments Financial Considerations The Comprehensive Plan designation for the property is Mixed Use Commercial. The proposed use is consistent with the land use map and long-range financial plan assumptions. Alternatives No official action is taken at a concept review. City Council may wish to discuss any concerns regarding the project on this property such as: proposed use, proposed architecture, landscaping, site layout, impacts on adjacent properties, and pedestrian and vehicular access. Item 2 - Page 1

2 Page 2 SUMMIT OFFICE PARK RESIDENTIAL UNITS CONCEPT REVIEW Report Contents Subject Page I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION 3 Property Owner and Applicant 3 Proposed Concept Plan 3 Broomfield Process 3 II. ZONING, PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR 4 THE PROPERTY, AND STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT Zoning, PUD Plan 4 Previously Approved Development Plans 4 Status of Development 4 III. APPLICABLE CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD PLANS 6 Relationship to Comprehensive Plan 6 IV. AREA CONTEXT 7 Property Location 7 Surrounding Land Uses 7 V. CURRENT APPLICATION DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND STAFF 7 REVIEW Background/Base Data 8 Land Use Summary 8 Existing Site Characteristics 9 Zoning and Consistency with Interchange Influence Area Requirements 9 Site Plan 10 Parking and Circulation 12 Landscaping 12 Public Land Dedication 13 Architecture 13 VI. STAFF REVIEW OF KEY ISSUES 13 VII. NEXT STEPS 13 Item 2 - Page 2

3 Page 3 I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION The proposal is to reconfigure the final unbuilt building in the Summit Office Park by converting it from a two-story office condominium building to a four-story building with tuck under parking for office and residential condominiums (12 to 18 units). Property Owner and Applicant The owner and applicant is Flatiron Office Ventures, LLC. Proposed Concept Plan The Summit Office Park plan includes four buildings. Two office buildings are complete and one is under construction. The applicant proposes to modify the final two-story building by increasing the height by three stories with one story of tuck under parking, one floor of office use and three stories of residential use. The slope of the site will allow tuck under parking on the north side of the building. The illustrations below show the location and proposed elevation of the modified building. Existing Summit Office Park with Building 2 Location Broomfield Process Revised Perspective for Building 2 from Northwest The concept review process allows the applicant to receive comments and direction from the public, City Council, and other boards and commissions in order to identify concerns or key issues prior to development of a formal application. Item 2 - Page 3

4 Page 4 II. ZONING, PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE PROPERTY, AND STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT Zoning, PUD Plan The site is zoned PUD with an Interchange Influence Area (IIA) overlay. The MidCities PUD Plan Second Amendment was approved in 2001 and provides the framework for a mix of restaurant, retail, office, hotel, recreation, entertainment, services and residential uses. The PUD permits residential over commercial, but would need to be amended to increase the number of residential units permitted and assign them to the subject property. The property is included in the Interchange Influence Area Overlay (Broomfield Municipal Code (BMC) 17-29). This overlay generally extends over the PUD zoned property on both sides of US 36 including MidCities and introduces provisions in addition of the requirements of the underlying zone district. The intent of the interchange influence area designation is to foster high quality development in the area of the interchange of the Northwest Parkway and US 36. The proposal follows the guidance of the overlay area except where amended by the approved PUD. In this case, the PUD permits a 60-foot building height vs. the 40 feet permitted in the IIA. Previously Approved Development Plans In 2007, a site development plan (SDP) was approved for the site. The plan included four office buildings with a total of 55,442 square feet and 185 parking spaces. Status of Development Overall, MidCities is designed for a mixture of commercial, retail, service, and residential uses supporting each other and the surrounding area. The following map and chart show the progress of development since 2000 when construction of the MidCities area began. Item 2 - Page 4

5 Page 5 Summary Status of Development for MidCities June 2015 Project Parcel Location Land Use Status Acres Southwest corner of SDP Approved Retail, Office, 1 Heritage Place Interlocken Loop and May 13, Residential Interlocken Boulevard No Construction Renaissance Suites Flatiron Boulevard Hotel Complete 4.0 at Flatiron 3 Staybridge Suites 4 Marriott Towne Place Suites 5 Hilton Garden Inn Southwest corner of Interlocken Loop and Flatiron Boulevard Hotel Concept Review December 19, 2008 No Construction 480 Flatiron Boulevard Hotel Complete 2.98 Southwest corner of Zang Street and Flatiron Blvd. Hotel SDP Approved July 22, 2008 No Construction Building Size (SF) 75 units 392, rooms 191, rooms 106, rooms 84, rooms 85,600 6 DSW Shoes 595 Flatiron Boulevard Retail Complete ,000 7 CB & Potts 555 Zang Street Restaurant Complete ,900 8 Restaurant 570 Zang Street Restaurant Complete ,559 9 MainStreet at Flatiron East and west of Zang Street and South of Flatiron Crossing Drive Commercial, Retail, Office, and Restaurant Complete , The Avenues 455 Zang Street Retail SDP Amendment Approved September 23, ,884 No Construction 11 El Tapatio 488 Summit Boulevard Restaurant Complete , Wells Fargo Bank 498 Summit Boulevard Bank Complete , Walmart 500 Summit Boulevard Retail Complete , Sunrise Senior 130 Units 400 Summit Boulevard Comm/Residential Complete 6.83 Housing 76 Asst. 15 Summit Office Park 301 Summit Boulevard Office SDP Approved June 12, 2007 Partially Complete , Summit Green 453 Summit Boulevard Site Development Plan and 200 Residential Final Plat Apartments 515 Summit Boulevard Apartments April 23, Lakeshore Athletic Club 300 Summit Boulevard Athletic Club Complete , The Summit at Summit Boulevard Residential Complete Broomfield Apartments 20 Carmel Flatirons Summit 220 Residential Complete Boulevard Apartments 21 Walgreens 1600 Coalton Road Retail Complete , Primrose School at 1680 Coalton Road Child Care Center the Flatirons Complete , Firestone Care Center 1800 Coalton Road Auto Service Complete , Jack in the Box at MidCities 1940 Coalton Road Drive-through Restaurant Complete , Summit Bank 2002 Coalton Road Bank Complete , Freddy's Frozen Drive-through 2300 Coalton Road Custard Restaurant Complete , End Zone Car Wash 2490 Coalton Road Car Wash Complete.85 4, Sonic Restaurant 2400 East Coalton Road Drive-through Restaurant Complete , Chick-fil-A 2580 Coalton Road Drive-through Complete Restaurant , Commercial Texaco and Auto 595 Summit Boulevard Retail, carwash, Service gas, service Complete , Undeveloped 62 W. Flatiron Crossing 32 Taco Bell 60 W. Flatiron Crossing Drive-through Restaurant Complete.92 1,949 Item 2 - Page 5

6 Page 6 III. APPLICABLE CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD PLANS Relationship to Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive Plan The Broomfield Comprehensive Plan designation for the proposed site is Mixed-Use Commercial and the proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mixed-Use Commercial recommends no more than 30% of the land area within the district be devoted to residential uses. Because the proposal is for residential above commercial, the current percentage of land area for residential would not increase. Goals and Policies The proposed project facilitates implementation of the following goals and policies identified in the Comprehensive Plan: Goal LU-B Encourage mixed-use developments that provide the benefits of more compact, denser development with a mix of living, shopping and working environments; Policy LU-A.2 Ensure that infill development and redevelopment contribute to the desired mix of land uses. The following map is a portion of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan that pertains to the subject property and surrounding area. Item 2 - Page 6

7 Page 7 IV. AREA CONTEXT Property Location The proposed development site is located on the north side of Summit Boulevard within MidCities. The vicinity map below shows the subject site and surrounding area. Surrounding Land Uses ADJACENT USE/ZONING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION North Bank, Restaurant (Freddy s) and Carwash/PUD Mixed-Use South Lakeshore Athletic Club/PUD Mixed-Use East Undeveloped (approved plan for Summit Green Apartments)/PUD Mixed-Use West RockVue Apartments/PUD Mixed-Use V. CURRENT APPLICATION DETAILED DESCRIPTION AND STAFF REVIEW The proposed site plan revision increases the square footage of the building from 11,009 square feet to 33,350 square feet and the height of the final building in Summit Office Park from two stories to five stories. A parking area and tuck under parking on the north side of the building will replace the landscaping and walkways in the currently approved SDP. Item 2 - Page 7

8 Page 8 The applicant states (Attachment 1) the proposal will address some of the parking issues overall in the Summit Office Park because current uses are generating parking needs that spill over into the allotted spaces for Building 4 (under construction) and Building 2 (subject of this concept review). The current approval provides 56 parking spaces for Building 2. These spaces were constructed with the original development. The applicant proposes the removal of one floor of office which would reduce the required spaces (thus freeing up parking for the rest of the office users). The parking for the residential uses would be added on the north side of Building 2 and the residential portion of the proposed building would be accessible from this side. Background/Base Data 1. OWNER Flatiron Office Ventures, LLC 2. APPLICANT Flatiron Office Ventures, LLC 3. PROPERTY LOCATION North side of Summit Boulevard, south of bank and Freddy s Steakburgers and Frozen Custard 4. PROPERTY SIZE 4.14 acres 5. CURRENT ZONING PUD with Interchange Influence Area Overlay 6. PROPOSED ZONING PUD with Interchange Influence Area Overlay 7. CURRENT LAND USE Three office buildings and one undeveloped office pad 8. PROPOSED LAND USE Office and residential 9. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Mixed-Use Commercial Land Use Summary The following is a composite land use summary for the proposed development. SUMMIT OFFICE PARK (TOTAL SITE) COMPOSITE LAND USE SUMMARY Land Use Coverage Acreage of Site Coverage % Total Floor Area of Building (SF) FAR Projected Construction Value Parking and Drives % Open Area % Building.66 16% 77, Total % Not provided Parking and Drives 39% Open Lands 45% Building 16% Item 2 - Page 8

9 Page 9 Existing Site Characteristics Summit Office Park is a 4.14-acre site with two completed office buildings (approximately 16,700 square feet in Building 1 and 11,000 square feet in Building 3) and one office building under construction (approximately 11,000 square feet in Building 4). With the initial construction of the project in 2008, the site work for the foundation of Building 2 was prepared, but construction did not proceed. The offices within the buildings are condominiums and the land within the project is collectively owned and maintained. The infrastructure surrounding the site is complete and can accommodate the uses proposed in this concept plan. Location of Proposed Amendment Within Summit Office Park SDP (upper right) Zoning and Consistency with Interchange Influence Area Requirements The current zoning is PUD with an Interchange Influence Area overlay. The PUD permits residential uses, but the proposed plan would require a text amendment to the MidCities PUD to increase the number of residential units permitted from 1,075 to 1,093 and designate the property for 18 residential units in addition to office use. The height in the approved PUD is five stories, 60 feet, which can be met by the proposed development. The adopted PUD standards supersede the 40-foot height standard of the Interchange Influence Area. The MidCities PUD requires a 20-foot setback from internal building site property lines, but allows the setback to vary to zero with Flatiron Architectural Control Committee (ACC) and City Council approval. A variance will need to be considered in the formal application for the SDP amendment should the new northern parking lot remain in the proposed location and configuration. Item 2 - Page 9

10 Page 10 The Flatiron Owners Association and ACC reviewed and commented on the proposal (Attachment 2). The Owners Association noted the property is deed restricted to prohibit residential uses. Prior to proceeding to a formal development application the applicant will need to reach an agreement with the Owners Association. This is a private negotiation which has occurred on other property in MidCities. The ACC will review the formal plans for conformance to the private design standards in MidCities as the project moves forward. Site Plan The proposed plan modifies the site plan for Summit Office Park by replacing the majority of the landscaped area north of Building 2 with parking. The following drawings illustrate the current approved plan for the north side of Building 2 and the proposed parking lot addition. The parking will be accessed from the private access drive located north of the property. The formal development application should coordinate the parking area access with the existing driveways on the access drive and a landscape buffer should be maintained between the new parking and the existing sidewalk. Existing Site Plan for Building 2 Item 2 - Page 10

11 Page 11 Proposed Site Plan Amendment for Building 2 The building will be significantly taller than the adjacent existing development as shown below. The applicant cites compatibility of the building with the four story building (one level of parking under a three story apartment structure) approved for the Summit Green apartments on the adjacent lot. Item 2 - Page 11

12 Page 12 Parking and Circulation Parking The applicant has stated the proposed revision to the plan will help remedy a parking shortage for the business uses within the Summit Office Park. By removing one floor of office use, the required amount of parking is reduced from 185 spaces to 148 spaces. Parking for the proposed residential units is 36 spaces. By reconfiguring the building and adding a level of tuck-under parking the proposed project provides 254 parking spaces 218 for the office (148 are required) and 36 for the residential units. A comparison of the existing and proposed parking is below. PARKING COMPARISON Approved Plan Proposed Plan Office Space 55,442 sf 44,433 sf Residential Units 0 18 Required Parking Office Use Required Parking Residential Use 0 36 Parking Provided for Office Use Parking for 18 Residential Units 36 Total Parking Vehicular Circulation The access to the existing office development will remain as is with the possibility of a reduction in the driveway width on the access to Summit Boulevard. Access to the parking for the residential use on the north side of Building 2 will be from the private access drive along the north edge of the property. The two parking areas will not be connected. Pedestrian Circulation The sidewalk along the private access drive will remain and is accessible to the residential units from the north side of the building. The office use is connected to the sidewalk system within the development connecting to the public sidewalk along Summit Boulevard and the private access drive. The Regional Transportation District s local Route 228 serves the area with bus service on Coalton Road (one block north of the subject site). The 228 route connects the Park-n-Ride at the 1 st Bank Center to the towns of Superior and Louisville through the MidCities area. Landscaping The concept plan includes 45% open area which complies with the requirements of the PUD plan. The approved SDP for Summit Office Park has 48% open area. The additional parking area will need a landscape buffer to separate the existing sidewalk along the private access drive from the parked cars. In order to achieve the landscape buffer, the parking spaces may need to be angled with a one-way drive. Item 2 - Page 12

13 Page 13 Public Land Dedication The addition of residential units triggers the need for additional public land dedication. As the site is almost completely developed, a dedication of park land is not possible. As an alternative, a cash payment, in lieu of land dedication, can be made. The fee would be calculated following the guidance in the Open Space and Trails Master Plan and is based on the number of people estimated to be generated by the additional residential units. Architecture The building has not been fully designed, but the applicant states it will incorporate stone and stucco to emulate the existing structures on the site. In addition, sloped roofs will be in character with the existing buildings. A concept perspective of the mass and design of the building is shown below. VI. STAFF REVIEW OF KEY ISSUES The following key issues are identified for discussion of the concept plan: Addition of residential units in MidCities The number of residential units in MidCities is currently capped at 1,075. A text amendment to the PUD would be required to increase the number of units to 1,093 to permit the proposed development. The applicant will need to pursue an agreement with the Flatiron Owners Association to allow the addition of residential use on the property. Public Land Dedication The text amendment will need to outline how the public land dedication requirement for the additional residential units will be met as the project moves forward. VII. NEXT STEPS After gathering comments at the concept review, the applicant may proceed with a formal development application for a PUD amendment and an amendment to the SDP for the Summit Office Park. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing and give recommendations to the City Council. Following a public hearing, City Council will render a final decision of approval or denial of the application. Item 2 - Page 13

14 ATTACHMENT 1 chitecture Davis / Jones May 1, 2015 Ms. Alice Hanson Senior Planner City and County of Broomfield One DesCombes Drive Broomfield, CO Summit Office Park Building Summit Boulevard Broomfield, CO Concept Review Page 1 of2 Project Description The reason for the concept review is to explore and obtain City comment for the conversion of Building 2 from a two story office condominium use to a mixed use of 3 floors of residential over 1 floor of office. Additional parking is proposed on at grade on the north side of the property. Brief History 1. A Site development plan for the project was approved in May of Of the Four approved buildings, only Buildings 1 and 3 were constructed Buildings 2 and 4 were not constructed The project was been dormant for several years. 2. In recent months, the plans for Buildings 2 and 4 were resubmitted for construction Building 4 is currently under construction 2.2. Building 2 is being re-evaluated for a change in use. Parking This re-evaluation of Building 2 is attempting to address parking issues on the site. 1. The current business uses in buildings 1 and 3 are generating parking needs that spill over into the allotted spaces for buildings 2 and Once buildings 2 and 4 are constructed, there will be a parking shortage on the site. 3. As it stands, Building 2 could be constructed per the original design (two levels of office condominiums) and meet the parking requirements of the approved Site Development Plan. 4. The reality is that, if it is constructed as currently designed, there will not be enough parking spaces to meet the current businesses uses on the site. Proposed Remedy The proposed concept is to convert Building 2 into a mixed-use, 4 story building over an open parking garage. The uses would be broken down into 3 floors of residential use and 1 floor of office use over an open parking garage. RECEIVED MAY PLANNING E. Jefferson Circle, Aurora, CO Item 2 - Page 14

15 chitecture Davis / Jones Benefits 1. The approved SDP has allotted 52 spaces for Building 2 (SDP sheet 1 of 11) Eliminating one floor of parking would reduce the need for 26 spaces (1/2 of 52). Thus freeing up 26 spaces for use by the other business occupancies. 2. The open parking garage below the building will provide spaces for use on the project. 2.1.The Residential parking requirements are substantially less than business uses Assuming 4-6 units per floor x three (3) floors = 18 units x min. of two spaces per unit = 36 required parking spaces < provided. This frees upwards of 20 additional spaces for business uses. The proposed remedy will provide additional parking on-site to accommodate the Residential use. An additional 46 spaces will be made available for business uses. Building Architecture and Massing It is intended that the new building will incorporate similar features and materials as found on the existing buildings 1. Although the buildings are not fully designed, they will incorporate stone and stucco to emulate the existing structures on the site. Sloped roofs will be in character with the existing buildings. 2. The four story massing will provide visual interest and a more dynamic building layout. 3. The new building will be set back from the North property line to minimize the impact of this building mass on the private drive. Adjacent properties 1. Recently and SDP has been approved for Summit Green Apartments (MIDCITIES Filing No 22) immediately to the East of this property. The proposed buildings on the North side of the property are 3 stories of residential over parking (4 story street impact) The height of our proposed building will be similarto the height of the Summit Green Apartments. 2. The properties to the north consist of individual businesses (restaurant, car wash, etc.) with curb cuts to the private drive This proposal aligns the north side parking entrance with one of the existing curb cuts (Sheet A1.01) This concept proposal addresses the specific need to increase the parking count on the property without negative impact to the surrounding properties (existing and proposed). Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Davis/Jprf^s "Architecture, Inc. Jeff re' Page 2 of E. Jefferson Circle, Aurora, CO Item 2 - Page 15

16 ATTACHMENT 2 Flatlron Architectural Control Committee 1529 Market Street, Suite 200 Denver, CO (303) wrb@urbanfrontier.com June 5, 2015 Ms. Alice Hanson City & County of Broomfield One DesCombes Drive Broomfield, CO Re: Summit Office Park Concept Submittal Dear Alice: The Flatlron Architectural Control Committee (ACC) has been notified of the proposed Site Development Plan Amendment for the above referenced project. It is our understanding the Applicant has made submittal to the City & County of Broomfield for a Concept Hearing to modify one of the approved office buildings to include apartment units. Until you brought this application to our attention, the Flatiron Owners Association ("FOA") and the Flatiron Architectural Control Committee ("ACC") were unaware of this proposed change. The Master Declaration for The Flatirons not only requires all proposed projects including rezoning to be submitted to the ACC for review & approval, it also specifically restricts all land uses to non-residential. By way of this letter, the ACC neither approves or rejects the proposed submittal. The Applicant must adhere to the terms of the Master Declaration as well as the approved zoning documents and Design Guidelines for development within the MainStreet at Flatlron project ("Controlling Documents"). The ACC reserves the right to all reviews and approvals as outlined in the Controlling Documents without exception. Please call if you have questions. Sincerely, William R. Branyan for the Flatlron Architectural Control Committee cc: ACC Members Flatirons Owners Association Item 2 - Page 16

17 Summit Office Park CITY COUNCIL CONCEPT REVIEW June 16, 2015 oaltonlrd T»ijj v" Path: G:\Project_Maps\Broomfield\Vicinity_Maps\Planning\Summit_Office_Park\Summit_Office_Park_SUMMARY.mxd Date: 5/6/2015, Aerial Date: March 2014 RECEIVED JUN PLANNING Item 2 - Page 17

18 SUMMIT OFFICE PARK Site Development Plan FLAT IRON OFFICE VENTURES 1860 Biake Street, Suite 400 Denver, CO Land Planning s SIS PCS GROUP INC Boulder St. Suite F Denver, CO tel fax Lotitude=39'55'^Q L ongitude= -105 '08 ' Grid Northing=!2!6752.4!2 Grid Eosting= Tom 1wrtntrigTT'-S Loco! Eosting=31004 >4.395 JiMuKtlt, Lb!, / Private Drive EXISTING LIGHTS ALONG PRIVATE DRIVE TCTREMfilR (TTP.j «aw«i TELEPHONE PAD BEHIND PROPOSED SIDEWALK N00'05 'C7"E 51.48',Q. jn 5 Esmt. a-2" SIDEWALK SSS^FSS Building Setback 51-0" FOUND MAIL k ILLEGIBLE TAG /f Main floor omce cl 1!>'. = 20' WIDt DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF MlpCITIES METROPOLITAN DISTRICT Mo. 1 F>ER REC # (BROOMFIEID COUNTY RECORDS) PARKING STANDARDS TABLE Sym. Typs Dims. Qtv. Standard Parking 9'x19" % C Compact Parking 3'x15' 73 40% Handicap Parking 13'x19' 10 5% HC 1 ' 3. Redesign biag 2 for office a residential occupancies -XX5-VX- fd Q- O QJ 1 \6c-Vi/Hyi in-g <Y//ll-s> BUILDING 3 O PARKING PUD MIN. 20' from Summit Blvd. NORTH SETBACK EAST SETBACK +/- 40' +/- 87' SOUTH SETBACK */- 105* 20' from Summit Blvd. EAST SETBACK SOUTH SETBACK +/ 64' +/- 105' 20' from Summit Blvd. EAST PROPERTY +/+/- 71* EXISTING CROSSWALK TO REMAIN 1? +/- 42' S.W. PROPERTY SOUTH PROPERTY +/- 22' AC UNITS (TfP \ TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNITS it/p.l WALL LEGEND Building JA c QJ E CL a; > o; Q a; en MSE BLOCK WALL CONCRETE WALL Drawn by: Checked by: Issue Date: Revisions: / EXISTING SIDEWALK OREMAiN 3 5»OWSTORAS GCATION 2U \vviue DRAINAGE EA^ N F A V0R 0F Di DlSiRlCT No. 1 PER REC 2003 frroomfield ^COUNTY R PROJECT BENCHMARK A TCir.rQ ilu«trm CP!N RANGE 90*. STA»<?ED 'PIS I2«05" MAflKIMO "HE LOCATION Or?HE HOSTHVSSt COSIER Of CECTlCSI 32. T0ttlSH3> I SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST 0? THE SIXTH PfitNQPAL f.eribimi. CITY AliO COUHH Of SROOMrlElD. 51ATE Cf COLORADO ELEVATION = 5«6 21 {CITY 0? QROCMrlELO DATUM) c Q. -w LANDSCAPE WALL Requesting variance on parking setback along eastern boundary for shared access access and parking. PUD plan states parking setback may van/ to Q' per ACC and City approval, (i.e. 10' landscape buffer strip wi berm at property line) CALL UNCC w% D= \ L=510.51' Chb=N44'54'53"W CftL= A 5.1' vjjvestproperty^ 20' from Summit Blvd. E E a\gvv ST LOCATION f5' ynorthproperty ni rzit^: i ww) PROVIDED NORTH SETBACK +/- 28' +/- 40' WEST SETBACK BUILDING 4 H 5 EXISTING LIGHTS IN SUMMIT BLVD. TO REMAIN (TYP.) BUILDING & PARKING SETBACK TABLE BUILDING 2 U o Retaining wa 197 Yotal Spaces^ BUILDING 1 EXISTING LIGHIS ALONG PRIVATE DRIVE O REMAIN ftyp.) S-0 (typ f. % s Building 2 3 Hoars Residential } 167l2sJ s.i -rr15-0 Jf- / - 10'-0' occupieo EXISTING SIDEWALK AND UTILITIES TO REMAIN 7301 c. B<-*r'kvr Avcftuo 3<A» ISC =n;l«ooa. CO Tct(HO) 4«Z-9326 r = EXISTING ISANSFORI EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAK 26'-8'' -7 elfl is:, :t 3HEET -HAHE mvl hide WALK 6 BEMENT GPAN TED BASIS OF BEARINGS,NORTH 59"5t=3' AtST. 5-fiG THE 5EAF1NG? mt^qrth UNE Of THE.'IGSTHaEST "XlART-R (MW ://.) Of SECTION 32 "QWSHI? 5C-JT.H. R»IV. 59 KShji^THt SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERCIAN.»S MCJUMENTEQ 3r A 2-1/2" AvJHBRJU CAP H RAKO go/. PIS AT THE NORTHEAST COSHER CF SAID HCHfH'iVEST QUARTER (HH 1/4).'NO 3Y i. 3-:/4" ALuUINUH CAP.M SAflGE BOX. pi.s!2<05 AT THE KORTHKST CORNER V >A!0 NQaTHfieSi CUART-fi <HH 1/4). EXISTING LiGH isim SUMMIT BLVD. TO REMAIN (TYP EXISTING CROSSWALK TO REMAIN A _ SITE PLAN SHEET?)UMBER Sca/e: I" = 30'-0" 2 of 11 Item 2 - Page 18

19 Redesign Bldg 2 to include 3 floors of Residential over 1 level of Office over a parking level below the building 3 floors Ri Item 2 - Page 19

20 Redesign BIdg 2 to include 3 floors of Residential over 1 level of Office over parking level below the building Item 2 - Page 20

21 PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE Lower Level Parking 143.3' EX. 10' TYPE 'R' INLE CO Upper level Main Level Platform 23.1 ISSUE DATE April.< ISSUE DESCRIPTION (J) PHQNE. PEDESTALS' "CONCRETE VAULT PROJECT NUMBER (5-001 NO^fHyV "A1.0' J SSALE: Al.O WV' OF: Item 2 - Page 21