301 Walnut Street, Windsor, CO AGENDA. 5. Presentation - NRPA Gold Medal Finalist Award & CPRA Columbine Award

Transcription

1 TOWN BOARD REGULAR MEETING October 8, 2018 // 7:00 p.m. // Town Board Chambers 301 Walnut Street, Windsor, CO AGENDA A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Review of Agenda by the Board and Addition of Items of New Business to the Agenda for Consideration by the Board 4. Proclamation National Community Planning Month 5. Presentation - NRPA Gold Medal Finalist Award & CPRA Columbine Award 6. Board Liaison Reports Town Board Member Baker Tree Board, Historic Preservation Commission Town Board Member Wilson Parks, Recreation & Culture Advisory Board; Poudre River Trail Corridor Board Mayor Pro Tem Bennett Water & Sewer Board Town Board Member Rennemeyer Chamber of Commerce Town Board Member Jones Windsor Housing Authority; Great Western Trail Authority Town Board Member Sislowski Clearview Library Board; Planning Commission Mayor Melendez Downtown Development Authority; North Front Range/MPO 7. Public Invited to be Heard Individuals wishing to participate in Public Invited to be Heard (non-agenda items) are requested to sign up on the form provided in the foyer of the Town Board Chambers. When you are recognized, step to the podium, state your name and address then speak to the Town Board. Individuals wishing to speak during the Public Invited to be Heard or during Public Hearing proceedings are encouraged to be prepared and individuals will be limited to three (3) minutes. Written comments are welcome and should be given to the Deputy Town Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. B. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the September 24, 2018 Regular Meeting Krystal Eucker 2. Advisory Board Appointments Krystal Eucker 3. Report of Bills September 2018 Dean Moyer 4. Resolution No Approving the Accessioning of Items to the Town of Windsor Museum Collection Eric Lucas 5. Resolution No Approving the De-accessioning of Items to the Town of Windsor Museum Collection Eric Lucas The Town of Windsor will make reasonable accommodations for access to town services, programs, and activities, and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call by noon on the prior to the meeting to make arrangements. Page 1 of 125

2 C. BOARD ACTION 1. Ordinance No An Ordinance Amending Section (b) of the Town of Windsor Municipal Code to allow accessory storage in the General Commercial zone district Super majority vote required on second reading Second Reading Legislative Staff presentation: Devin King, Planner I 2. Ordinance No An Ordinance Amending Section of the Town of Windsor Municipal Code regarding multifamily residential off-street parking requirements Super majority vote required on second reading Second Reading Legislative Staff presentation: Paul Hornbeck, Senior Planner 3. Resolution No Approving Modifications to the Road Impact Fee Schedule Pursuant to Section (b) of the Windsor Municipal Code Legislative action Staff presentation: Scott Ballstadt, Director of Planning 4. Resolution No A Resolution Urging the Defeat of Proposition 112, a Proposed Statutory Amendment that Would Increase Setbacks for New Oil and Gas Facilities Legislative action Staff presentation: Shane Hale, Town Manager 5. Resolution No A Resolution Urging the Defeat of Amendment 74, a Ballot Measure that Would Amend the Colorado Constitution, and Thereby add Significantly Higher Cost to Taxpayers and Impair the Ability of Government to Protect Public Health, Safety and Welfare Legislative action Staff presentation: Shane Hale, Town Manager D. COMMUNICATIONS 1. Communications from the Town Attorney 2. Communications from Town Staff Windsor Commons 3 rd Filing Lot 5 Block 2 Total Directional Services Site Plan 3. Communications from the Town Manager 4. Communications from Town Board Members E. EXECUTIVE SESSION An executive session pursuant to Colorado Revised Statutes (4)(e) (I) for the purpose of determining positions relative to matters that may be subject to negotiations; developing strategy for negotiations; and instructing negotiators with respect for certain Economic Development Incentives (Jill Young, Economic Development Specialist) F. ADJOURN Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 125

3 PROCLAMATION FOR NATIONAL COMMUNITY PLANNING MONTH Whereas, change is constant and affects all cities, towns, counties, and other places; and Whereas, community planning and plans can help manage change in a way that provides better choices for how citizens work and live; and Whereas, community planning provides an opportunity for all residents to be meaningfully involved in making choices that determine the future of their community; and Whereas, the full benefits of planning require public officials and citizens who understand, support and demand excellence in planning and plan implementation; and Whereas, the month of October is designated as national community planning month throughout the United States of America and its territories; and Whereas, the celebration of national community planning month provides an opportunity to recognize the participation and dedication of members of planning commissions and other citizens who have contributed their time and expertise to the improvement of their communities; Now, therefore, the Town of Windsor, Colorado, does hereby proclaim October 2018 as National Community Planning Month in recognition of Windsor s dedication and commitment to community planning. Dated this 8 th day of October, Kristie Melendez, Mayor 301 Walnut Street Windsor, Colorado phone fax Page 3 of 125

4 TOWN BOARD REGULAR MEETING September 24, 2018 // 7:00 p.m. // Town Board Chambers 301 Walnut Street, Windsor, CO MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Melendez called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 1. Roll Call Mayor Kristie Melendez Mayor Pro Tem Absent- Ken Bennett Myles Baker Barry Wilson Paul Rennemeyer Thomas Jones Absent- David Sislowski Also Present: Town Manager Shane Hale Town Attorney Ian McCargar Assistant Town Attorney Kim Emil Director of Economic Development Stacy Miller Director of Parks, Recreation and Culture Eric Lucas Director of Engineering Dennis Wagner Director of Planning Scott Ballstadt Chief of Police Rick Klimek Director of Finance Dean Moyer Water Resource Manager John Thornhill Chief Planner Carlin Malone Planner 1 Devin King Human Resource Manager Jaci Kremser Town Clerk Krystal Eucker 2. Pledge of Allegiance Town Board Member Baker led the pledge of allegiance. 3. Review of Agenda by the Board and Addition of Items of New Business to the Agenda for Consideration by the Board Town Board Member Rennemeyer moved to approve the agenda as presented, Town Board Member Jones seconded the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed. 4. Certificate of Recognition Mike Schwan, Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment and Northern Colorado Breastfeeding Coalition Mr. Mike Schwan from Weld County recognized Human Resources Manager, Jaci Kremser on her efforts to promote nursing employees of the Town of Windsor. 5. Board Liaison Reports Town Board Member Baker Tree Board, Historic Preservation Commission The Town of Windsor will make reasonable accommodations for access to town services, programs, and activities, and will make special communication arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call by noon on the prior to the meeting to make arrangements. Page 4 of 125

5 Town Board Member Baker reported the Tree Board meets on September 25, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. Town Board Member Wilson Parks, Recreation & Culture Advisory Board; Poudre River Trail Corridor Board Town Board Member Wilson reported there is a section of the Poudre River Trail that is closed and will be closed until approximately October 16 th. The section that is closed is east of Highway 257. The Human Bean gave a portion of their proceeds from their grand opening to the Poudre River Trail Corridor which amounted to almost $3,000. Mr. Wilson reported the National Recreation and Parks Association named the Windsor Parks, Recreation and Culture Department as a top 10 finalist. Mayor Pro Tem Bennett Water & Sewer Board Mayor Pro Tem Bennett - Absent Town Board Member Rennemeyer Chamber of Commerce Town Board Member Rennemeyer reported the Annual Chamber Dinner is scheduled for October 18, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. Town Board Member Jones Windsor Housing Authority; Great Western Trail Authority Town Board Member Jones reported the Windsor Housing Authority met and they will be closing at the end of October on Windshire. Also, the Governor s Farm purchase is in the works again as the property owner is willing to reconsider the original offer by the Windsor Housing Authority. Town Board Member Sislowski Clearview Library Board; Planning Commission Town Board Member Sislowski Absent Mayor Melendez Downtown Development Authority; North Front Range/MPO Mayor Melendez reported the Downtown Development Authority met and the budget was presented to the Town Board on September 17 th There is still discussions taking place regarding the back lots and there will be an open house on October 23, 2018 from 4:00 7:00 p.m. at the old town hall. The wayfinding project has commenced. The Mill has started moving forward and activity will become more active at the beginning of October. Small business Saturday is the Saturday after Thanksgiving; the Elf on Shelf will also begin on Small Business Saturday and run through the Windsor Wonderland event. 6. Public Invited to be Heard Mayor Melendez opened the meeting up for public comment to which there was none. B. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the September 10, 2018 Regular Meeting Krystal Eucker 2. Resolution No Adopting the Strategic Plan Kelly Houghteling 3. Cancellation of November 12, 2018 Regular Town Board Meeting Krystal Eucker 4. Resolution No A Resolution in Support for the Northern Integrated Supply Project Preferred Alternative as Described in the Final Environmental Impact Statement John Thornhill Town Board Member Rennemeyer moved to approve the consent calendar as presented. Town Board Member Wilson seconded the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed. Page 2 of 8 Page 5 of 125

6 C. BOARD ACTION 1. Ordinance No An Ordinance Approving the Transfer of Real Property from the Town of Windsor to Colorado National Sports Park, LLC Super majority vote required on second reading Second Reading Legislative action Staff presentation: Shane Hale, Town Manager; Stacy Miller, Director of Economic Development; Ian D. McCargar, Town Attorney Mr. Hale informed the Board that on September 10, 2018, the Town Board approved Resolution No , authorizing the execution of the Agreement for Cooperative Development and Use of Diamond Valley Property between the Town and Colorado National Sports Park, LLC ( Agreement ), and approved on first reading of Ordinance No , which authorized the legal transfer of the Diamond Valley Property through the Special Warranty Deed attached to the Agreement. Mr. Baker commented that it is really big decision for the Town although there are a lot of safeguards in place to protect the Town and believes this will be a win for Windsor. Mr. Rennemeyer is in support of the ordinance. Ms. Melendez ensured the citizens that the Town Board has done their due diligence regarding this agreement. Ms. Melendez opened the meeting up for public comment to which there was none. Town Board Member Rennemeyer moved to approve Ordinance No Approving the Transfer of Real Property from the Town of Windsor to Colorado National Sports Park, LLC. Town Board Member Wilson seconded the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed 2. Ordinance No An Ordinance Approving an Amendment to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a Sign Criteria Plan, Raindance Subdivision David Nelson, Raindance Land Company LLC, owner; Martin Lind, Raindance Land Company LLC; owner/owner s representative / Tom Siegel, Water Valley Land Company LLC, applicant s representative Super majority vote required on second reading Second Reading Quasi-judicial Staff presentation: Carlin Malone, Chief Planner Per Ms. Malone, the first reading of Ordinance was approved by the Board on September 10, 2018 which will approve an overall design package that is cohesive for the planned unit development. There have been no changes since first reading Staff recommends approval of Ordinance Page 3 of 8 Page 6 of 125

7 Mr. Wilson inquired about the identity features and that not everyone will be happy with it in the future. Ms. Malone stated there are no locations proposed for the feature but the ideas would go through a permit process. Ms. Melendez opened the meeting for public comment to which there was none. Town Board Member Wilson moved to approve Ordinance No Approving an Amendment to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a Sign Criteria Plan, Raindance Subdivision. Town Board Member Rennemeyer seconded the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed. 3. Public Hearing Ordinance No An Ordinance Amending Section (b) of the Town of Windsor Municipal Code to allow accessory storage in the General Commercial zone district First Reading Legislative Staff presentation: Devin King, Planner I Town Board Member Rennemeyer moved to open the public hearing. Town Board Member Jones seconded the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed. Per Mr. King, the included amended language addressing outdoor storage and display is in response to the need from commercial users for accessory outdoor storage in the General Commercial zone district and the effort to accommodate that need while maintaining the small town feel that citizens, Town Board and Planning Commission have expressed as important. As Windsor continues to grow and larger retail establishments look to our commercial areas to locate, the code will need to appropriately address such accessory outdoor uses in the General Commercial zone district to maintain the character of our commercial corridors while allowing the incidental storage and display that is common with retail establishments. This language would require that these accessory uses be reviewed during the site plan process to ensure compliance. The following shows a comparison of the screening language that was changed per the direction given by Town Board at the August 27, 2018 work session: Presented at August 27 work session: d. Shall be permanently and fully screened from residential uses, rights-of-way and private drives by screening that is incorporated into the overall design theme and is continuous with the architectural design of the principal building. Current Ordinance language: d. Items located in outdoor storage areas shall be permanently and fully screened from adjacent residential property, public rights-of-way and private drives by opaque structural walls, opaque fencing and/or a combination thereof that is at least as tall as the tallest items in storage. Screening materials shall conceal all items in storage, shall be opaque and consist predominately of colors Page 4 of 8 Page 7 of 125

8 and materials generally matching the principal building on the premises. Chain link screening material, with or without slats, is prohibited. Three categories of accessory uses are proposed to distinguish the difference in storage versus display versus seasonal sales. Storage is pertaining only to the materials or equipment used in the course of business, such as pallets, loading equipment and inventory of goods. Display is pertaining to the incidental display of merchandise, an example of which would be grills or lawnmowers outside along the wall of the principal building. Lastly, seasonal sales is in relation to the seasonal sales specifically related to a season such as plant, Christmas tree or pumpkin sales. At the September 19, 2018 Planning Commission meeting, commissioners questioned whether or not 60 days is adequate time for seasonal sales to be displayed. Staff followed up to this question by contacting some of the local businesses that tend to have seasonal sales, Ace Hardware and King Soopers, to discuss the typical duration of their seasonal sales. It was determined from these conversations that 90 consecutive days would be a more appropriate timeframe and the ordinance before you was revised to reflect this. The proposed code amendment is consistent with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, particularly Goal 8 in the Commercial & Industrial Areas Framework Plan, Create a distinct sense of place for the Town s commercial and industrial districts. At its September 19, 2018 regular meeting, the Planning Commission forwarded to the Town Board a recommendation of approval of Ordinance amending Section (b) to allow accessory outdoor storage and display in the General Commercial zone district subject to any Town Board direction. Mr. Jones inquired as to accessory seasonal sales of 5%. Mr. King stated the outside storage can use up to 5% of the required parking spaces. Town Board Member Rennemeyer moved to close the public hearing. Town Board Member Baker seconded the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed. 4. Ordinance No An Ordinance Amending Section (b) of the Town of Windsor Municipal Code to allow accessory storage in the General Commercial zone district First Reading Legislative Staff presentation: Devin King, Planner I Mr. King had nothing further to add Town Board Member Rennemeyer moved to approve Ordinance No Amending Section (b) of the Town of Windsor Municipal Code to allow accessory storage in the General Commercial zone district. Town Board Member Wilson seconded the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed. Page 5 of 8 Page 8 of 125

9 5. Public Hearing Ordinance No An Ordinance Amending Section of the Town of Windsor Municipal Code regarding multifamily residential off-street parking requirements First Reading Legislative Staff presentation: Paul Hornbeck, Senior Planner Town Board Member Rennemeyer moved to open the public hearing. Town Board Member Jones the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed. Per Mr. Ballstadt, the Town has experienced multifamily residential development in record numbers over the past few years and this has brought to light the need to reexamine the parking ratio required for multifamily residential uses. Code Section requires 1.5 parking spaces per multifamily unit. This requirement does not appear to adequately account for visitor and overflow parking, particularly when on-street parking is not available. Staff has reviewed parking ratios for regional jurisdictions and looked at national studies by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in determining the proposed parking ratios listed in the table below alongside regional jurisdictions. To measure the impact of the proposed amendment staff compared the parking requirements under the existing and proposed parking codes using two case studies of recent multifamily developments, as shown in the tables below. In both cases, the new parking ratio would have increased the minimum parking required by approximately 10%. This amendment is primarily targeted at multifamily projects that do not have on-street parking available so a credit is given when on-street parking is available adjacent to the development. The credit proposed is one parking space for every 25 of linear frontage on a street with on-street parking, up to 10% of the required parking. This credit is similar to a credit allowed for all uses within the downtown area and would largely mitigate any increase in parking requirements under the proposed amendment when on-street parking is available. A question that came up during the last work session was ensuring adequate flexibility to keep up with evolving trends in transportation or for projects with unique parking demands. A review of the current code language shows that such flexibility can be easily addressed with a minor change to the title of Municipal Code Section (a)7 which provides Planning Commission the ability to make determinations regarding parking when there is a question: At their July 18, 2018, meeting the Planning Commission forwarded to Town Board a recommendation of approval of the proposed amendment to Municipal Code Section to modify the multifamily parking requirements as outlined. Mr. Baker inquired as to future technologies that may not require as many parking spaces. Page 6 of 8 Page 9 of 125

10 Mr. Ballstadt stated the current goal is to make the parking match the need but that code can be reviewed in the future as new or other modes of transportation develop. Mr. Rennemeyer inquired as to how these new regulations will affect the projects that are currently in the approval process. Mr. McCargar stated there is no specific exception or special language on the effective date so the Ordinance would take effect 10 days after publication following final adoption. Mr. Ballstadt stated normally it would not be applied to any projects that are already in the review process. Mr. Baker confirmed that the Ordinance will become effective on all new submittals. Mr. McCargar stated the Ordinance will take effect immediately unless the application has been submitted under the previous requirements. Town Board Member Rennemeyer moved to close the public hearing. Town Board Member Jones seconded the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed. 6. Ordinance No An Ordinance Amending Section of the Town of Windsor Municipal Code regarding multifamily residential off-street parking requirements First Reading Legislative Staff presentation: Paul Hornbeck, Senior Planner Per Mr. Ballstadt, staff recommends the language regarding the effective date be added between first and second reading. Town Board Member Jones moved to approve Ordinance Amending Section of the Town of Windsor Municipal Code regarding multifamily residential off-street parking requirements. Town Board Member Rennemeyer seconded the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed. 7. August Financial Report Staff presentation: Dean Moyer, Director of Finance Mr. Moyer presented the financial report that was included in packet material. 8. Community Development Report Staff presentation: Scott Ballstadt, Director of Planning Mr. Ballstadt presented the Community Development Report that was included in packet material. Mr. Rennemeyer inquired as to Severance and all of their growth, how does Windsor monitor their waste and with Windsor s waste to not overload the treatment facility. Page 7 of 8 Page 10 of 125

11 Mr. Ballstadt stated the IGA with Severance has a master meter cap of how much flow that they are allowed. D. COMMUNICATIONS 1. Communications from the Town Attorney None 2. Communications from Town Staff Mr. Lucas informed the Board that the Gold Medal Award will be live on Facebook tomorrow morning at 8:00 a.m. 3. Communications from the Town Manager None 4. Communications from Town Board Members Ms. Melendez stated she attended the Mayor s Conference on September 13 th and 14 th Ms. Melendez stated that after hearing stories of how different Boards work or don t work together and thanked the Windsor Town Board for their professionalism, caring for their community and implementing the best policies for the citizens. ADJOURN Town Board Member Rennemeyer moved to adjourn. Town Board Member Jones second the motion. Roll call on the vote resulted as follows: Yeas Baker, Wilson, Rennemeyer, Jones, Melendez; Nays- None; Motion passed. The meeting was adjourned at 7:52 p.m. Krystal Eucker, Town Clerk Page 8 of 8 Page 11 of 125

12 MEMORANDUM Date: October 8, 2018 To: Mayor and Town Board Via: Shane Hale, Town Manager From: Krystal Eucker, Town Clerk Re: Advisory Board Appointments Item #: B.2 Background / Discussion On October 2, 2018, Mayor Melendez and Town Board Member Rennemeyer conducted advisory board interviews for the Windsor Housing Authority, Planning Commission Tree Board, Water & Sewer Board, Parks, Recreation and Culture Advisory Board and the Downtown Development Authority. Pursuant to those interviews, the following individuals are being recommended for appointment: Windsor Housing Authority one term three applicants Chris Melson, term expiring March 2021 Planning Commission one alternate term three applicants Scott Ready, alternate term expiring March 2019 Tree Board two terms two applicants Rebekah Wilson, term expiring September 2022 (incumbent) David (DJ) Calvin, term expiring September 2022 Water & Sewer Board one term one applicant Janene Willey, term expiring March 2019 Parks, Recreation and Culture Board two terms four applicants Shandi Fischer, term expiring September 2022 Nick Mask, term expiring September 2022 Downtown Development Authority two terms one applicant Daniel Brunk, term expiring June 2020 Attachments: Applications Page 12 of 125

13 Page 13 of 125

14 Page 14 of 125

15 Page 15 of 125

16 Page 16 of 125

17 Page 17 of 125

18 Page 18 of 125

19 Page 19 of 125

20 Page 20 of 125

21 Page 21 of 125

22 Page 22 of 125

23 Page 23 of 125

24 Page 24 of 125

25 Page 25 of 125

26 Page 26 of 125

27 Page 27 of 125

28 Page 28 of 125

29 Page 29 of 125

30 Page 30 of 125

31 Page 31 of 125

32 Page 32 of 125

33 Page 33 of 125

34 Page 34 of 125

35 Page 35 of 125

36 Page 36 of 125

37 Page 37 of 125

38 Page 38 of 125

39 Page 39 of 125

40 Page 40 of 125

41 Page 41 of 125

42 Page 42 of 125

43 Page 43 of 125

44 Page 44 of 125

45 Page 45 of 125

46 Page 46 of 125

47 MEMORANDUM Date: October 8, 2018 To: Mayor and Town Board Shane Hale, Town Manager From: Eric Lucas, CPRP, Director of Parks and Recreation Re: Museum Collections Accession Item #: B.4.a Background / Discussion The Parks, Recreation, and Culture Advisory Board will occasionally have the opportunity to review recommended accessions and deaccessions to the permanent collection of the Town of Windsor Museum, per adopted policies. PReCAB has reviewed the attached items and has recommended accessioning items at their September 11, 2018 meeting. Museum collection items are only accessioned into the collection when they fit the following criteria: Object illustrates unique Windsor heritage as specified in mission statement. Known provenance. Object displays rarity as specified in collections criteria Collection supports object s interpretive potential for exhibition. Stable Condition Museum can adequately care for object All items listed are items currently in the museums possession, and have been donated to the museum. Financial Impact Museum staff does not foresee any financial impact associated with the formal accession of these items. Recommendation Move to approve Resolution , to accession museum collections items as presented by staff. Attachments b. Resolution c. Acquisition Forms for Potential Acquisition (Vergara, Coloradoan) Page 47 of 125

48 TOWN OF WINDSOR RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE WINDSOR TOWN BOARD APPROVING THE ACCESSIONING OF ITEMS TO THE TOWN OF WINDSOR MUSEUM COLLECTION WHEREAS, the Town of Windsor owns an extensive museum collection, the purpose of which is to preserve and enhance the rich cultural history of the Town, and to educate the public accordingly; and WHEREAS, in October, 2010, the Town Board adopted by resolution the Town s Museum Accessioning Policy, the intention of which is to assure that items proposed for addition to the Town s Museum collection are reviewed by staff and by the Parks, Recreation and Culture Advisory Board; and WHEREAS, the Town s Parks, Recreation & Culture Director has prepared the attached lists of items which, if accessioned, will meet the purposes and mission of the Town s Museum collection; and WHEREAS, in keeping with the Town s Museum Accessioning Policy, the Town s Parks, Recreation and Culture Advisory Board has reviewed the attached lists of items, and has recommended that the items described therein be added to the Town s Museum Collection; and WHEREAS, the Town Board having considered the attached lists and recommendation of the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Advisory Board, finds that accessioning of the items described in the attached listing is in the public interest and promotes the essential purposes of the Town s Museum collection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: The items described in the attached lists, incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth fully, are hereby accepted by the Town of Windsor as part of its Museum collection. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 8 th day of October, TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO ATTEST: Krystal Eucker, Town Clerk By: Kristie Melendez, Mayor Page 48 of 125

49 Page 49 of 125

50 Page 50 of 125

51 Page 51 of 125

52 Page 52 of 125

53 Page 53 of 125

54 Page 54 of 125

55 Page 55 of 125

56 Page 56 of 125

57 Page 57 of 125

58 Page 58 of 125

59 Page 59 of 125

60 MEMORANDUM Date: October 8, 2018 To: Mayor and Town Board Shane Hale, Town Manager From: Eric Lucas, CPRP, Director of Parks and Recreation Re: Museum Collections Accession Item #: B.5.a Background / Discussion The Parks, Recreation, and Culture Advisory Board will occasionally have the opportunity to review recommended accessions and deaccessions to the permanent collection of the Town of Windsor Museum, per adopted policies. PReCAB has reviewed the attached items and has recommended accessioning items at their September 11, 2018 meeting. Museum collection items are only accessioned into the collection when they fit the following criteria: Object illustrates unique Windsor heritage as specified in mission statement. Known provenance. Object displays rarity as specified in collections criteria Collection supports object s interpretive potential for exhibition. Stable Condition Museum can adequately care for object All items listed are items currently in the museums possession, and have been donated to the museum. Financial Impact Museum staff does not foresee any financial impact associated with the formal accession of these items. Recommendation Move to approve Resolution , to deaccession museum collections items as presented by staff. Attachments b. Resolution c. Deaccession Form for 3D frame Page 60 of 125

61 TOWN OF WINDSOR RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE WINDSOR TOWN BOARD APPROVING THE ACCESSIONING OF ITEMS TO THE TOWN OF WINDSOR MUSEUM COLLECTION WHEREAS, the Town of Windsor owns an extensive museum collection, the purpose of which is to preserve and enhance the rich cultural history of the Town, and to educate the public accordingly; and WHEREAS, in October, 2010, the Town Board adopted by resolution the Town s Museum Deaccessioning Policy, the intention of which is to assure that items proposed for removal from the Town s Museum collection are reviewed by staff and by the Parks, Recreation and Culture Advisory Board; and WHEREAS, the Town s Parks, Recreation & Culture Director has prepared the attached lists of items which, if deaccessioned, will meet the purposes and mission of the Town s Museum collection; and WHEREAS, in keeping with the Town s Museum Accessioning Policy, the Town s Parks, Recreation and Culture Advisory Board has reviewed the attached lists of items, and has recommended that the items described therein be removed from the Town s Museum Collection; and WHEREAS, the Town Board having considered the attached lists and recommendation of the Parks, Recreation, and Culture Advisory Board, finds that deaccessioning of the item described in the attached listing is in the public interest and promotes the essential purposes of the Town s Museum collection. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: The items described in the attached lists, incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth fully, are hereby removed from the Town of Windsor as part of its Museum collection. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 8 th day of October, TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO ATTEST: Krystal Eucker, Town Clerk By: Kristie Melendez, Mayor Page 61 of 125

62 Town of Windsor Department of Parks, Recreation, and Culture Culture Division 250 N. 11 th Street * Windsor, CO Deaccession Object to be Deaccessioned: Accession #: 1900.temp3052 Donor/Source: Unknown, likely Windsor-Severance Historical Society Description of object: Frame, 3D. Interior backing is green burlap, fixed to backing are multiple leather straps. On front glass exterior are adhesive labels. A collection of nightsticks were once displayed in this frame. Nightsticks are still in collection and information from labels is recorded. Condition of object: Many leather straps are broken, wood frame is no longer attached at corners, backing is completely unattached to back and faded, multiple nails protruding from the frame. Specific Reason for Deaccession: _X_ Object does not illustrate unique Windsor heritage as specified in mission statement. _X_ No known provenance. _X_ Object lacks rarity as specified in collections criteria _X_ Collection does not support objects interpretive potential for exhibition Duplicate in Collection _X_ Poor Condition _X_ Museum cannot adequately care for object Unidentifiable Page 62 of 125

63 Method of Disposal: Transferred to the Windsor Museum s use/education collection Returned to Donor X Destroyed Given to institution in which object is more relevant/significant to the institution s mission. Public Auction Cannot be found in inventory Signatures: Museum Curator Director of Parks and Recreation Mayor, Town of Windsor Date Date Date Action Taken: Date Results: Value received: Date Acc. #: Page 63 of 125

64 MEMORANDUM Date: October 8, 2018 To: Mayor and Town Board From: Devin King, Planner I Re: Ordinance No An Ordinance Amending Section (b) of the Windsor Municipal Code Regarding Accessory Outdoor Storage and Display in the General Commercial Zone District Second Reading Item #: C.1 Background / Discussion As discussed at the August 27, 2018 work session, the included amended language addressing outdoor storage and display is in response to the need from commercial users for accessory outdoor storage in the General Commercial zone district and the effort to accommodate that need while maintaining the small town feel that citizens, Town Board and Planning Commission have expressed as important. As Windsor continues to grow and larger retail establishments look to our commercial areas to locate, the code will need to appropriately address such accessory outdoor uses in the General Commercial zone district to maintain the character of our commercial corridors while allowing the incidental storage and display that is common with retail establishments. During the August 27, 2018 work session, Town Board members indicated that screening and location requirements would need to play a key role in keeping all accessory outdoor storage out of view from public rights-of-way and residential uses. When combined with the parking and landscaping standards already in place, the proposed amended language will achieve the goal of keeping outdoor storage and display areas to an appropriate and aesthetically pleasing level. It requires the materials to be opaque and predominately match the principal building while prohibiting the use of chain link fencing. In addition, the language also mandates that it be oriented away from major streets like Main Street. Buffers from residential uses are already addressed in the landscape standards and parking requirements will further keep the amount of outdoor storage to a reasonable size. This language would require that these accessory uses be reviewed during the site plan process to ensure compliance. The following shows a comparison of the screening language that was changed per the direction given by Town Board at the August 27, 2018 work session: Presented at August 27 work session: d. Shall be permanently and fully screened from residential uses, rights-of-way and private drives by screening that is incorporated into the overall design theme and is continuous with the architectural design of the principal building. Current Ordinance language: Page 64 of 125

65 d. Items located in outdoor storage areas shall be permanently and fully screened from adjacent residential property, public rights-of-way and private drives by opaque structural walls, opaque fencing and/or a combination thereof that is at least as tall as the tallest items in storage. Screening materials shall conceal all items in storage, shall be opaque and consist predominately of colors and materials generally matching the principal building on the premises. Chain link screening material, with or without slats, is prohibited. Three categories of accessory uses are proposed to distinguish the difference in storage versus display versus seasonal sales. Storage is pertaining only to the materials or equipment used in the course of business, such as pallets, loading equipment and inventory of goods. Display is pertaining to the incidental display of merchandise, an example of which would be grills or lawnmowers outside along the wall of the principal building. Lastly, seasonal sales is in relation to the seasonal sales specifically related to a season such as plant, Christmas tree or pumpkin sales. At the September 19, 2018 Planning Commission meeting, commissioners questioned whether or not 60 days is adequate time for seasonal sales to be displayed. Staff followed up to this question by contacting some of the local businesses that tend to have seasonal sales, Ace Hardware and King Soopers, to discuss the typical duration of their seasonal sales. It was determined from these conversations that 90 consecutive days would be a more appropriate timeframe and the ordinance before you was revised to reflect this. Relation to 2016 Comprehensive Plan The proposed code amendment is consistent with the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, particularly Goal 8 in the Commercial & Industrial Areas Framework Plan, Create a distinct sense of place for the Town s commercial and industrial districts. Recommendation At its September 19, 2018 regular meeting, the Planning Commission forwarded to the Town Board a recommendation of approval of Ordinance amending Section (b) to allow accessory outdoor storage and display in the General Commercial zone district and Town Board approved first reading of the ordinance on September 24, Attachment Ordinance for General Commercial Accessory Outdoor Storage Staff PowerPoint Page 2 of 2 Page 65 of 125

66 Page 66 of 125

67 Page 67 of 125

68 Page 68 of 125

69 Page 69 of 125

70 Amendment to Municipal Code Section (b) Accessory Outdoor Storage & Display Devin King, Planner 1 Town Board October 8, 2018 Page 70 of 125

71 Municipal Code Amendment Proposed: Amendment to Section (b) with: Accessory Outdoor Storage Accessory Outdoor Display Accessory Seasonal Sales Page 71 of 125

72 Municipal Code Amendment Proposed: Accessory Outdoor Storage: Storage of materials, inventory or equipment used for business Locations must be depicted on approved site plan Must not displace required parking Must be completely screened from streets, drives and residential uses Screening must match building design If site constraints preclude complete screening, CUG approval of a screening plan by Planning Commission and/or Town Board required Page 72 of 125

73 Municipal Code Amendment Presented at August 27 work session: Shall be permanently and fully screened from residential uses, rights-of-way and private drives by screening that is incorporated into the overall design theme and is continuous with the architectural design of the principal building. Current Ordinance language: Items located in outdoor storage areas shall be permanently and fully screened from adjacent residential property, public rights-of-way and private drives by opaque structural walls, opaque fencing and/or a combination thereof that is at least as tall as the tallest items in storage. Screening materials shall conceal all items in storage, shall be opaque and consist predominately of colors and materials generally matching the principal building on the premises. Chain link screening material, with or without slats, is prohibited. Page 73 of 125

74 Municipal Code Amendment Proposed: Accessory outdoor display: Merchandise incidental to retail use Locations must be depicted on approved site plan Must not displace required parking spaces Must be within 40-feet of customer entrances Must maintain 4-foot clear path for pedestrian use Page 74 of 125

75 Municipal Code Amendment Proposed: Accessory seasonal sales: Locations must be depicted on approved site plan Limited to not more than 5% of required parking Limited to 90 calendar days per calendar year Page 75 of 125

76 Recommendation At their September 19, 2018 meeting, Planning Commission forwarded to Town Board a recommendation of approval of the proposed amendment to the Windsor Municipal Code Section (b) to allow accessory outdoor storage and display in the General Commercial zone district and Town Board approved first reading of the ordinance on September 24, Page 76 of 125

77 MEMORANDUM Date: October 8, 2018 To: From: Mayor and Town Board Paul Hornbeck, Senior Planner Re: Ordinance No An Ordinance Amending Section of the Windsor Municipal Code Concerning the Parking Ratios for Multifamily Residential Developments Second Reading Item #: C.2 Background / Discussion As discussed at two recent work sessions, the Town has experienced multifamily residential development in record numbers over the past few years and this has brought to light the need to re-examine the parking ratio required for multifamily residential uses. Code Section requires 1.5 parking spaces per multifamily unit. This requirement does not appear to adequately account for visitor and overflow parking, particularly when on-street parking is not available. A shortage of parking may result in issues regarding vehicles parked in fire lanes, landscaped areas, or designated bike lanes, and may unduly burden the surrounding neighborhood. Although some of these would be private parking issues, such issues result in increased calls to the Police Department and Code Enforcement and ultimately leave the residents with little recourse. At the work sessions on this topic, the majority of Planning Commission and Town Board expressed concern that the current parking ratio is insufficient and that an approach which assigns a parking ratio based on the number of bedrooms in a unit is preferred. There is no uniformly accepted parking ratio for multifamily projects since every project has a different context and a different mix of residents and associated travel patterns. However, a review of other regional jurisdictions parking ratios and research of parking generation rates indicate Windsor s parking ratio to be on the low side. Of particular concern are multifamily developments without adjacent on-street parking to help absorb overflow parking. Given the lack of a uniform parking ratio that works for all scenarios, staff has attempted to draft a code amendment that takes into account unique development features, such as number of bedrooms and availability of on-street parking, while maintaining a code that is easy to apply. Minimum off-street parking ratios are intended to ensure adequate parking is provided to prevent issues such as parking in fire lanes or landscaped areas and to prevent unduly burdening the community with excessive overflow parking on streets or surrounding properties. However, setting minimum parking ratios too high can negatively impact the community in other ways and some jurisdictions even have maximum parking ratios. Larger parking lots lead to larger storm water runoff which must be managed, contribute to the heat island effect, are inefficient uses of land, are typically less attractive features of sites, and are an additional cost for developers. Therefore, parking ratios should attempt to strike a balance between providing enough, but not excessive amount, of parking. Staff has reviewed parking ratios for regional jurisdictions and looked at national studies by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in determining the proposed parking ratios listed in the table below alongside regional jurisdictions. Page 77 of 125

78 Multi-Family Parking Code Requirements Number of bedrooms Boulder Erie Firestone Fort Collins Frederick Greeley Longmont Loveland Windsor (Proposed) 1 br or 2.25 per unit based on zoning 2 br per 3 units 3 br per 3 units 4 br per 3 units 1 or 2.25 per unit based on zoning 1 or 2.25 per unit based on zoning 1 or 2.25 per unit based on zoning per 4 units per 4 units per 4 units Note: Base parking ratios shown. Some jurisdictions have reduced parking ratios for affordable housing, proximity to transit, and in certain zone districts. To measure the impact of the proposed amendment staff compared the parking requirements under the existing and proposed parking codes using two case studies of recent multifamily developments, as shown in the tables below. In both cases, the new parking ratio would have increased the minimum parking required by approximately 10%. Project A Pelican Bluffs (South Hill 4 th & 5 th Filings) Number of Number Parking Ratio Required Parking Spaces bedrooms of Units (Existing/ Proposed) (Existing/ Proposed) 1 BR / / BR / / 217 Total = / / 325 (335 provided) Project B Fossil Ridge Apartments (Eagle Crossing 4 th Filing) Number of Number Parking Ratio Required Parking Spaces bedrooms of Units (Existing/ Proposed) (Existing/ Proposed) 1 BR / / BR / / BR / / 48 Total = / / 675 (620 to be provided) Page 2 of 3 Page 78 of 125

79 This amendment is primarily targeted at multifamily projects that do not have on-street parking available so a credit is given when on-street parking is available adjacent to the development. The credit proposed is one parking space for every 25 of linear frontage on a street with on-street parking, up to 10% of the required parking. This credit is similar to a credit allowed for all uses within the downtown area and would largely mitigate any increase in parking requirements under the proposed amendment when on-street parking is available. One question that came up during the last work session was ensuring adequate flexibility to keep up with evolving trends in transportation or for projects with unique parking demands. A review of the current code language shows that such flexibility can be easily addressed with a minor change to the title of Municipal Code Section (a)7 which provides Planning Commission the ability to make determinations regarding parking when there is a question: Parking Determinations. In any case where there is a question as to the parking requirements for a use or where such requirements are not specifically enumerated, the Planning Commission shall convene a public hearing to determine the appropriate application of the parking requirements to the specific situation, applying the criteria set forth above and in keeping with sound land use planning principles. Additionally, at the September 24 th first reading of the ordinance, Town Board directed staff to add language which clarifies the effective date of the ordinance and ensures that it will not apply to any complete multifamily submittals that may already be under review. Such language has been added to the enclosed ordinance. Relationship to Strategic Plan The proposed code amendment is consistent with the Strategic Plan, particularly Prosperous Local Economy and Safe, Well-Planned Community With Spirit And Pride. Recommendation At their July 18, 2018, meeting the Planning Commission forwarded to Town Board a recommendation of approval of the proposed amendment to Municipal Code Section to modify the multifamily parking requirements and Town Board approved first reading on September 24, Attachment Ordinance Staff PowerPoint Page 3 of 3 Page 79 of 125

80 TOWN OF WINDSOR ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION OF THE WINDSOR MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING THE PARKING RATIOS FOR MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WHEREAS, the Town of Windsor ( Town ) is a Colorado home rule municipality, with all powers and authority vested under Colorado law; and WHEREAS, the Town has in place a comprehensive system of land use regulations, intended to promote the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the current code language does not distinguish between the multifamily units and number of bedrooms contained within each dwelling, thereby does not account for the amount of people actually living in each unit; and WHEREAS, this unilateral application of 1.5 parking units per dwelling, rather than by bedroom and number of residents per dwelling, does not account for existing residential, visitor, and overflow parking, particularly when on-street parking is unavailable; and WHEREAS, the Town Board has given this proposed code amendment due consideration and concluded that its approval promotes the public health, safety and welfare while remaining consistent with achieving a safe, well planned community with spirit and pride. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: 1 Page 80 of 125

81 Section 1. Section (a)(6) is hereby repealed, amended and replaced as follows: (6) Determination of need. The number of parking spaces required shall be based upon the anticipated parking demand of individual uses and shall be as designated for specific uses and situations as follows: Use Parking Requirements Single-family residence Multifamily dwelling residence*: Public assembly facilities, provided for seated audiences (churches, theaters, auditoriums, etc.) Elementary schools (If the elementary school includes an auditorium, the auditorium requirement above shall govern if it is greater.) Junior and senior high schools Hospitals Clinics Industrial uses Commercial office Retail stores, customer service establishments, shopping centers and other similar uses Eating and drinking establishments Hotel or motel 2 spaces per dwelling unit 1 bedroom or studio parking spaces 2 bedroom parking spaces 3 bedroom parking spaces 4+ bedroom parking spaces 1 space for every three seats 2 spaces for every classroom Auditorium requirement above or 1 space for every 5 students of maximum occupant capacity 1 space for every 2 beds 5 spaces for every practitioner on the staff 1 space for every 2 employees 1 space for every 300 square buildings feet of Gross Leasable Area (GLA) 1 space for every 250 square feet of GLA 1 space for every 200 square feet of GLA, plus 1 space for every 2 employees, computed on the maximum service capacity 1 space for every room to be rented, plus 1 space for every 2 employees, computed on the maximum service capacity *Multifamily development shall receive a credit towards the requirements of this sub-section on one (1) parking space for every twenty-five (25) feet of the subject lot s frontage on a public street which is designed to accommodate on-street parking. Such credit shall not exceed 10% of the total required parking of any one development. 2 Page 81 of 125

82 Section 2. follows: Section (a) (7) is hereby repealed, amended and re-adopted to read as (7) Uses not enumerated. In any case where there is a question as to the parking requirements for a use or where such requirements are not specifically enumerated, the Planning Commission shall convene a public hearing to determine the appropriate application of the parking requirements to the specific situation, applying the criteria set forth above and in keeping with sound land use planning principles. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect as provided in the Windsor Home Rule Charter, except that it shall not apply to any complete multi-family land use site plan applications under Town review as of September 24, Introduced, passed on first reading, and ordered published this 24 th day of September, TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO ATTEST: Krystal Eucker, Town Clerk By Kristie Melendez, Mayor [Seal] Introduced, passed on second reading, and ordered published this 8 th day of October, TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO ATTEST: Krystal Eucker, Town Clerk By Kristie Melendez, Mayor [Seal] 3 Page 82 of 125

83 A m e n d m e n t t o M u n i c i p a l C o d e S e c t i o n C o n c e r n i n g T h e P a r k i n g R a t i o s F o r M u l t i f a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l D e v e l o p m e n t s Paul Hornbeck, Senior Planner Town Board October 8, 2018 Page 83 of 125

84 Currently Section requires 1.5 parking spaces per multifamily unit Page 84 of 125

85 Case Studies Page 85 of 125

86 Parking Determination Parking Determinations. In any case where there is a question as to the parking requirements for a use or where such requirements are not specifically enumerated, the Planning Commission shall convene a public hearing to determine the appropriate application of the parking requirements to the specific situation, applying the criteria set forth above and in keeping with sound land use planning principles. Page 86 of 125

87 Recommendation At their July 18, 2018, meeting the Planning Commission forwarded to Town Board a recommendation of approval of the proposed amendment to Municipal Code Section to modify the multifamily parking requirements, and the Town Board approved first reading of the ordinance on September 24, Page 87 of 125

88 MEMORANDUM Date: October 8, 2018 To: Mayor and Town Board From: Scott Ballstadt, AICP, Director of Planning Re: Resolution No Approving Modifications to the Road Impact Fee Schedule Pursuant to Section (b) of the Windsor Municipal Code Item #: C.3 Background / Discussion Section (b) of the Municipal Code requires the Town to perform an annual review of the Road Impact Fee Table and make adjustments to account for inflation. Based on the most recent 2 year annual data calculations of Q2 Colorado Construction Cost Index (CCCI) figures published by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), the 2018 annual adjustment results in an increase of 10.13%. The Town hired the consulting team of Duncan and Associates and Felsburg Holt & Ullevig to prepare a comprehensive Road Impact Fee Study and subsequently adopted Windsor s first road impact fees in 2001 with Ordinance No The ordinance establishes a system for the imposition of road impact fees to assure that new development contributes its proportionate share of the cost of providing, and benefits from the provision of, road capital improvements within the benefit area. In 2016, the Town hired the same consulting team to prepare the Road Impact Fee Update and subsequently adopted Ordinance No Section (b) requires annual review of the road impact fee schedule to make adjustments to account for inflation as follows: In each year during which a comprehensive update is not performed, the fee schedule shall be adjusted to account for construction cost inflation, pursuant to the provisions of this Section. The Road Impact Fee Administrator shall calculate adjustments to the road impact fee rates by multiplying them by a ratio, the numerator of which is the most recently available two-year moving average of the annual Colorado Construction Cost Index by the Colorado Department of Transportation, and the denominator of which is the same index for a period one (1) year earlier than the numerator. The adjusted fee schedule shall become effective upon and in accordance with the approval thereof by the Town Board. The Road Impact Fee Administrator shall make the adjusted impact fee schedule publicly available. Page 88 of 125

89 Proposed Road Impact Fee Table Updates: The enclosed resolution addresses the 2018 annual review based on CCCI figures to account for inflation as required by Section (b) of the Municipal Code. Using the latest available data from the attached CCCI Report, the below calculation compares the most recent CDOT 2 year annual data calculations (Q ) and the 2 year annual data calculations from the previous two year period (Q ). Year Quarter Fischer Index (2016 Q2 = 1.00) Change from Prior Year 2016 Q n/a 2017 Q % 2018 Q % 2-Year Average Q % Also enclosed is a table that compares current fees to fees that have been adjusted to reflect this 10.13% increase. Conformance with Comprehensive Plan Chapter 6 Transportation & Mobility Goal Develop a multi-modal transportation system that accommodates new and existing development, provides safe and efficient access for all ages and abilities, and promotes public health and quality of life. Objectives - 1. Extend roadways as development occurs to enhance the connectivity for all users and increase the capacity and mobility of the transportation network. 8. Consider the use of impact fees for accelerated State Highway improvements. Relationship to Strategic Plan Thoughtful Framework and Supportive Infrastructure: Traffic and roadways Recommendation Approval of resolution to make adjustments to account for inflation as required by Section (b) of the Municipal Code. Attachments Resolution Colorado Construction Cost Index Report 2018 Second Quarter Comparison Table Current and Adjusted Fees Town of Windsor Road Impact Fee History Page 2 of 2 Page 89 of 125

90 TOWN OF WINDSOR RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO THE ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO SECTION (b) OF THE WINDSOR MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, Chapter 17, Article XV, of Windsor Municipal Code ( Road Impact Fee Ordinance ) establishes the purpose, intent and criteria for the assessment of road impact fees in the Town of Windsor; and WHEREAS, Section (c) (1) of the Road Impact Fee Ordinance establishes the fee schedule for enumerated land uses; and WHEREAS, Section (b) of the Road Impact Fee Ordinance provides criteria for calculating annual adjustments to the fee schedule, based upon the most recently available twoyear moving average of the annual Colorado Construction Cost Index published by the Colorado Department of Transportation; and WHEREAS, the Road Impact Fee Administrator has determined that the most recently available statistics for the Colorado Construction Cost Index published by the Colorado Department of Transportation provides justification for an increase in roadway construction costs of ten and thirteen one-hundredths percent (10.13%). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: The Town of Windsor hereby approves an increase of ten and thirteen onehundredths percent (10.13%), to be applied to all road impart fees assessed in accordance with Chapter 17, Article XV of the Windsor Municipal Code, which increase shall apply to all completed building permits received on and after January 1, Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 8 th day of October, TOWN OF WINDSOR ATTEST: Kristie Melendez, Mayor Krystal Eucker, Town Clerk Page 90 of 125

91 STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Project Support Contracts and Market Analysis Branch COLORADO CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX REPORT Calendar Year 2018 Second Quarter Prepared for Joshua Laipply, Chief Engineer Prepared by Engineering Estimates and Market Analysis Unit Contracts and Market Analysis Branch Division of Project Support Page 91 of 125

92 CCI REPORT SUMMARY 2 nd QUARTER ENDING June 30, 2018 Relative change from last quarter, quarterly data* 16.43% Cumulative change from same quarter last year, quarterly data*.51.98% Relative change from last year, annual data** % * Calculations based on quarterly data may vary significantly due to strong seasonality in Colorado. ** Calculations derived from the most recent four consecutive quarters of data compared to the previous four consecutive quarters of data. For example, relative change for 2 nd QUARTER ENDING June 30, 2017 is derived from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 data compared to July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016 data. Page 92 of 125

93 Summary for all Design-Bid-Build projects awarded between 4/1/2018 and 6/30/2018 Project Amount Number of Projects Number of Bidders Biddable Items Total Amount Average Number of Bidders $0.00 to $999, $1,994, $1,000, to $4,999, $27,737, $5,000, to $19,999, $17,273, $20,000, or Greater 0 0 $ Total $47,006, Average number of bidders per project decreased to 4.30 this quarter from 4.36 the previous quarter. Average cost per Design-Bid-Build project was $2,043, Page 93 of 125

94 Colorado Construction Cost Index Tabulations: Quarterly Data Earthwork Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete Pavement* Structural Concrete Reinforcing Steel Fisher Ideal Index Year Quarter Price ($/CY) Qty (CY) Price ($/TON) Qty (TON) Price ($/SY) Qty (SY) Price ($/CY) Qty (CY) Price ($/LB) Qty (LB) Relative Cumulative 2012 Q , , , , ,956, Q , , , , , Q , , , , , Q , , n/a** n/a** , , Q , , , , ,929, Q , , , , ,048, Q , , , , ,350, Q , , , , , Q , , , , , Q , , , , ,468, Q , , , , ,949, Q , , , , , Q , , , , , Q , , , , , Q , , , , Q , , , , , Q , ,078, , , ,627, Q , , , , , Q , , , , , Q , , , , Q , , , , , Q , , , , , Q , , , , , Q , , , , , Q , , , , , Q , , n/a** n/a** , Weighted average prices and quantities are calculated after outliers (< 5% and > 95%) are removed in the preceding 7 years for a given quarter. * Concrete Pavement is normalized to 9 inches thick. ** Assuming same price and quantity as previous quarter for index calculations, due to insufficient data of this sub group. Page 94 of 125

95 2012 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Colorado CCI - Quarterly Data, Cumulative Assuming 2012 Q1 = Calendar Year - Quarter Page 95 of 125 Construction Cost Index

96 Colorado Construction Cost Index Tabulations: Annual Percentage Change Earthwork Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete Pavement* Structural Concrete Reinforcing Steel Fisher Ideal Index (Annual Change) Year Quarter Price ($/CY) Qty (CY) Price ($/TON) Qty (TON) Price ($/SY) Qty (SY) Price ($/CY) Qty (CY) Price ($/LB) Qty (LB) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q Q ,751, ,382, , , ,569, % Q ,880, ,363, , , ,772, % Q ,846, ,287, , , ,787, % Q ,121, ,146, , , ,585, % 2013 Q ,485, , ,029, , ,558, % Q ,434, ,101, , , ,774, % Q ,642, ,188, , , ,639, % Q ,471, ,241, , , ,815, % 2014 Q , ,281, , , ,515, % Q ,205, ,327, , , ,934, % Q ,494, ,283, , , ,533, % Q ,114, ,225, , , ,994, % 2015 Q ,316, ,529, , , ,734, % Q ,872, ,292, , , ,471, % Q ,204, ,279, , , ,608, % Q , ,204, , , ,027, % 2016 Q ,456, ,546, , , ,286, % Q ,303, ,352, , , ,093, % Q ,766, ,550, , , ,338, % Q ,538, ,592, , , ,990, % 2017 Q , , , , , % Q , ,179, , , , % Q , , , , , % Q , , , , , % 2018 Q , , , , , % Q , , , , , % - - Weighted average prices and quantities are calculated after outliers (< 5% and > 95%) are removed in the preceding 7 years for a given quarter. * Concrete Pavement is normalized to 9 inches thick. Page 96 of 125

97 Colorado CCI - Annual Percentage Change 30.00% 25.00% 20.00% 20.73% 19.65% Construction Cost Index 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% -5.00% 15.75% 15.53% 15.05% 10.64% 10.96% 10.18% 9.65% 6.96% 6.78% 3.92% -2.97% 7.23% 3.93% 4.54% 4.13% 1.03% 0.67% 0.60% 1.06% 0.56% -0.35% -1.69% -2.50% -2.85% % % % 2012 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q4 Calendar Year - Quarter 2016 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q2 Calculations derived from the most recent four consecutive quarters of data compared to the previous four consecutive quarters of data. Page 97 of 125

98 Comments: The methodology for preparing the CCI is documented in a brief report attached to the 2012 CCI Q2 report at the following link under the Construction Cost Index heading and 2012 CCI Q2 report. Starting with 2016 Q3, this quarterly CCI report includes calculations based on annual data. The annual data calculations are less volatile than the quarterly data calculations, partially due to the strong seasonal nature of transportation construction in Colorado. For the current quarter, price changes for the five sub groups, as shown in the Colorado Construction Cost Index Tabulations: Quarterly Data, are listed as follows: Earthwork (Excavation and Embankment): The average price was $15.58/CY, which is up $1.61/CY, with less than one-third times the quantity, from the previous quarter. Hot Mix Asphalt: The average price was $110.11/TON, which is up $19.20/TON, with more than one-eighth times the quantity, from the previous quarter. Concrete Pavement: There was insufficient data of this sub group this quarter to report any price change from the previous quarter. Structural Concrete: The average price was $809.61/CY, which is down $52.69/CY, with slightly more than threefourths times the quantity, from the previous quarter. Reinforcing Steel: The average price was $1.54/LB, which is up $0.15/LB, with slightly more than two-thirds times the quantity, from the previous quarter. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This quarter, based on preceding quarter data, three sub groups, Earthwork, Hot Mix Asphalt, and Reinforcing Steel showed an increase in price, while one sub group, Structural Concrete, showed a decrease in price, and there was insufficient data for Concrete Pavement to report any price change. This quarter, 23 Design-Bid-Build projects for a total of $47,006, were bid and awarded. The five categories for CCI items totaled $7,035, which is 15.0% of total Design-Bid-Build awarded amount. By comparison, last quarter, 39 Design-Bid-Build projects were bid and awarded. Projects Awarded this Quarter and Not Used in the CCI Calculations Project Type Number of Biddable Items Projects Total Amount Design-Build 1 $248,287, Hybrid / Modified / Streamlined Design-Build 0 $0.00 Construction Manager / General Contractor 0 $0.00 Emergency 1 $3,928, Sub Total 2 $252,215, Page 98 of 125

99 Land Use Type Single-family detached Sec (c)(1) Road Impact Fee Table Unit Fee/Unit (current) Difference Fee/Unit % adjustment Dwelling $3,838 $389 $4,227 Multi-family Dwelling $2,436 $247 $2,683 Mobile Home Park Site $1,156 $117 $1,273 Retail/Commercial 1,000 sq. ft. $5,076 $514 $5,590 Office 1,000 sq. ft. $4,674 $473 $5,147 Public/Institutional 1,000 sq. ft. $2,834 $287 $3,121 Industrial 1,000 sq. ft. $2,016 $204 $2,220 Warehouse 1,000 sq, ft. $1,879 $190 $2,069 Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sq. ft. $1,319 $134 $1,453 Oil and Gas Well Wellhead $2,111 $214 $2,325 Page 99 of 125

100 Town of Windsor Road Impact Fee History Resolution/ Date Ordinance 9/24/01 Ord Established a road impact fee for first time 9/9/02 Res Established an administrative fee for pre-development review of impact fee calculations 2/25/08 Res Approving and Adopting the Road Impact Fee Update 2007, prepared by Duncan Associates in Association with Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig 2/25/08 Ord Repealed and readopted Article XV of Chapter 17 re-establishing road impact fees. This was the first 5-year update as required by the ordinance and, in addition to updating the fees, it also added language regarding annual adjustments to account for inflation based on the Colorado Construction Cost Index (CCCI) - which is why no annual adjustments occurred prior to /10/08 Res Established a schedule for implementation of fee increases resulting from Ord as follows: fees that decreased were fully implemented on April 1, 2008; fees that increased were implemented 50% on November 1, 2008 and the remaining 50% was to be implemented on July 1, /22/09 Res Further delayed the implementation of fee increases resulting from Ord , delaying the remaining 50% fee increase from July 1, 2009 until January 1, This resolution also specified that the first annual modification based on CCCI shall take effect January 1, 2010 and subsequent modifications will become effective January 1 st of each successive year. 10/12/09 Ord Repealed and readopted portions of Chapter 17 concerning implementation of road impact fees. This ordinance amended the definitions of traffic generating development and modified the look-back period. The original look-back period considered the use of the property in the 12 months prior to the new traffic generating development. This was changed to consider the use of the property from the date when the road impact fee first took effect, or January 1, /14/09 Res Decreased road impact fees by 12.3% based on CCCI effective 1/1/10 12/13/10 Res Decreased road impact fees by 4.3% based on CCCI effective 12/14/10 6/13/11 Res Authorized reimbursement to eligible developers for non-site related road capital improvements made to the Town s roads 10/24/11 Res Proposed to increase road impact fees by 7.1% based on CCCI effective 1/1/12; item was tabled to a future work session (1/16/12) 1/16/12 work session Consideration of whether road impact fees should be adjusted to reflect the 7.1% increase in roadway construction costs based on CCCI; and consideration of additional reimbursements to eligible developers 3/26/12 work session Consultant Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig made a presentation to Town Board with an overview of Windsor s road impact fee history including a comparison of fees at 7/9/12 discussion 7/23/12 formal action Res the local, state and national levels On July 9 th the Town Board discussed and authorized reimbursement to eligible developers (Motion to approve the full retirement of the balances in the Road Impact Fee reimbursement queue, and, that to the extend the Road Impact Fee Trust Fund has insufficient balance to make that payment, authorize the Town to reach into the General Fund to make up the difference and also motioned that the Town make an early payment of the funds that were budgeted for 2012 and make a final payment to the Water Valley Metropolitan District #2; carried unanimously) and on July 23 rd the Town Board passed Res ratifying such. 7/1/13 work session Town Attorney presented information regarding road impact fees as they relate to heavy truck traffic (oil & gas) Page 100 of 125

101 3/23/15 Ord Added a road impact fee for oil and gas extraction sites to apply to each Statepermitted wellhead 11/16/16 work session Discussion of road impact fee look-back period 1/25/16 Ord Eliminated the look-back period altogether to simplify administration of the road impact fee ordinance and to eliminate disincentives to investment in existing buildings 12/12/16 Ord Increased road impact fees by 2.3% based on Q CCCI effective 1/1/17 6/19/17 work session Town Board and Planning Commission joint work session to review draft materials, followed by a meeting with development community on June 29 th 7/17/17 work session Town Board and Planning Commission joint work session to review materials revised to address development community concerns 9/11/17 Res Accepting and Adopting the 2017 Roadway Improvement Plan and Road Impact Fee Update Prepared by Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig in conjunction with Duncan Associates 9/25/17 Ord Repealing, Amending and Readopting Chapter 17, Article 15 of the Windsor Municipal Code with respect to Road Impact Fees (Second Reading) 11/6/17 work session Following additional comments from the development community, Town Board held a work session to discuss the implementation of Ord After discussion, Ord was implemented as passed on 9/25/17. 9/17/18 work session Discussion of annual road impact fee adjustment for inflation per Section (b) of the Municipal Code to reflect the 10.13% increase in roadway construction costs based on CDOTs Q2 CCCI. Page 101 of 125

102 MEMORANDUM Date: October 8, 2018 To: Windsor Town Board From: Shane Hale, Town Manager Re: Resolutions opposing Amendment 74 & Proposition 112 Item #: C.4 & 5 Background / Discussion At the Mayor s request, I have asked the Town Attorney to prepare two Resolutions for discussion this evening. The first is a Resolution opposing Proposition 112, which is the 2500-foot oil and gas setback measure. The Colorado Municipal League and a number of other interested parties have come out in opposition. This Resolution states the Town s opposition, and encourages the Town s voters to vote NO on this ballot measure. The second is a Resolution opposing Amendment 74, which would amend the State Constitution to require compensation for any reduction in property value caused by government law or regulation. The Colorado Municipal League has strongly urged that its members come out in opposition to this measure. This Resolution states the Town s opposition, and encourages the Town s voters to vote NO on this ballot measure. I have attached materials provided to us by CML on each of these topics, along with some election-related material provided by CML (talking points, Fair Campaign Practices Act, Grand Junction Sentinel article) for your reference. Financial Impact None. Relationship to Strategic Plan Economic sustainability; quality of life. Recommendation Discuss and adopt both Resolutions. Page 102 of 125

103 Page 103 of 125

104 Page 104 of 125

105 Page 105 of 125

106 Page 106 of 125

107 Page 107 of 125

108 Page 108 of 125

109 Page 109 of 125

110 Page 110 of 125

111 Page 111 of 125

112 Page 112 of 125

113 Page 113 of 125

114 TOWN OF WINDSOR RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION URGING THE DEFEAT OF PROPOSITION 112, A PROPOSED STATUTORY AMENDMENT THAT WOULD INCREASE SETBACKS FOR NEW OIL AND GAS FACILITIES WHEREAS, the Town of Windsor ( Town ) is a Colorado home rule municipality with all powers and authority under Colorado law; and WHEREAS, Colorado is a major energy-producing state, and Weld County is a leading producer of natural gas and crude oil; and WHEREAS, Colorado is widely recognized as a national leader in developing health, safety and environmental protections; and WHEREAS, oil and natural gas development is a critical sector of the state and local economies, supporting jobs and supplying locally produced and affordable energy to households and businesses; and WHEREAS, Proposition #112 appears on the November 6, 2018, statewide ballot and, if approved by the voters, would amend the Colorado statutes to require a minimum setback of 2,500 feet between any new oil and gas well and the following: Occupied structures, playgrounds, permanent sports fields, amphitheaters, public parks, public open space, public and community drinking water, sources, irrigation canals, reservoirs, lakes, rivers, perennial or intermittent, streams, and creeks, and any additional vulnerable areas designated by the state or a local government WHEREAS, a study conducted by the REMI Partnership, a coalition of state business groups, estimates that implementation of Proposition #112 could eliminate over $26 billion annually in state Gross Domestic Product, more than $1 billion in state and local tax revenue per year, and almost 150,000 Colorado jobs by 2030; and WHEREAS, more than 232,000 jobs in Colorado are supported by oil and natural gas development, equivalent to 6.5 percent of total employment in the state, according to a 2017 study by accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers; and WHEREAS, according to the same study, oil and natural gas development in Colorado supports more than $31 billion in economic activity, equivalent to almost 10 percent of the state economy; and Page 114 of 125

115 WHEREAS, oil and natural gas development in Colorado generates almost $1.2 billion in tax revenue, according to a 2015 study by the University of Colorado s Leeds School of Business; and WHEREAS, the loss of Colorado s energy sector would have a substantial adverse impact on the state economy, state and local budgets, and the livelihoods of a large number of working families; and WHEREAS, the Town collects over $365,000 on average per year in severance tax revenue alone from the energy sector, in addition to obtaining various grants for Town s infrastructure projects and lease royalties; and WHEREAS, it is widely believed that Proposition # 112, if adopted, would create a de facto ban on oil and gas production even in communities that embrace responsible energy development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR: 1. The Town of Windsor declares its firm opposition to Proposition # The Town Board urges the Town s voters to vote NO on Proposition #112. Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 8 th day of October, ATTEST: TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO By: Kristie Melendez, Mayor Krystal Eucker, Town Clerk [Seal] 2 Page 115 of 125

116 TOWN OF WINDSOR RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION URGING THE DEFEAT OF AMENDMENT 74, A BALLOT MEASURE THAT WOULD AMEND THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION, AND THEREBY ADD SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER COST TO TAXPAYERS AND IMPAIR THE ABILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE WHEREAS, the Town of Windsor ( Town ) is a Colorado home rule municipality with all powers and authority provided by Colorado law; and WHEREAS, local government services are essential to the citizens of the Town; and WHEREAS, Amendment 74 has been written by certain out-of-state corporate interests to change the text of Article II, Section 15 of the Colorado Constitution, which dates back to 1876; and WHEREAS, Amendment 74 declares that any state or local government law or regulation that reduces the fair market value of private property is subject to just compensation ; and WHEREAS, while Amendment 74 is shrouded in simple language, it has far-reaching and unintended impacts; and WHEREAS, under the current Colorado Constitution and statutes, a property owner already has a right to compensation for the taking of private property for public use; and WHEREAS, Amendment 74 would expand this well-established concept by requiring the Town s taxpayers to compensate private property owners for virtually any decrease whatsoever in the fair market value of their property traceable to any governmental law or regulation; and WHEREAS, Amendment 74 would create uncertainty because it is not clear what the language actually means or how it can be applied to the broad spectrum of governmental action; and WHEREAS, Amendment 74 would drastically diminish the ability of state and local governments to adopt (let alone attempt to enforce) reasonable regulations, limitations and restrictions upon private activity; and WHEREAS, Amendment 74 would place laws, ordinances and regulations designed to protect public health and safety, the environment, natural resources, public infrastructure and other public resources in jeopardy; and WHEREAS, Amendment 74 would directly impact zoning, population density limitations and land use planning; and Page 116 of 125

117 WHEREAS, Amendment 74 would make inherently dangerous or environmentally damaging activities prohibitively costly to regulate, even in the interest of public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, Amendment 74 broadly threatens core governmental services and functions; and WHEREAS, any arguable impact upon fair market value - - however reasonable, justified, minimal, incidental or temporary - - resulting from state or local government action could trigger a claim for the taxpayers to pay an award of damages; and WHEREAS, Amendment 74 would leave governments vulnerable to law suits for almost every regulatory decision, rendering common governmental functions prohibitively expensive for the taxpayers; and WHEREAS, efforts similar to Amendment 74 have been attempted and have failed in other states such as Oregon and Washington; and WHEREAS, the fiscal impact for similar language in Washington was estimated at Two Billion Dollars for the state government, and 1.5 Billion Dollars for local governments over the first six years; and WHEREAS, individuals filed several thousand claims against state and local governments with an estimated value in excess of several billions of dollars in claims in Oregon before the residents repealed the law; and WHEREAS, the Town Board has been urged to join many other governmental entities in urging the defeat of Amendment 74; and WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to strongly voice its opposition to Amendment 74 and to urge the citizens of Windsor to vote against Amendment 74. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Town of Windsor strongly opposes Amendment The Town Board strongly urges the voters to vote NO on Amendment 74 on November 6, Page 117 of 125

118 Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 8 th day of October, ATTEST: TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO By: Kristie Melendez, Mayor Krystal Eucker, Town Clerk [Seal] 3 Page 118 of 125

119 MEMORANDUM Date: October 1, 2018 To: Mayor & Town Board From: Millissa Berry, AICP, Senior Planner Re: Site Plan Summary Windsor Commons Subdivision 3 rd Filing Lot 5 Block 2 Total Directional Services Comments by: October 22, 2018 Site Plan Summary Applicant: Nathan Koshman Applicant s Representative: Rick Hazel, Hauser Architects Business: Total Directional Services Location: 560 Logistics Drive Subdivision / Lot-Block: Windsor Commons Subdivision 3 rd Filing / Lot 5 Block 2 Zoning: Limited Industrial, I-L Adjacent Zoning: I-L Special Planning Area: no Overall development characteristics: lot area = 1 acre 13,200 square foot (sf) building total / 10,200 sf footprint (~23.5% lot coverage) o 5,663 sf manufacturing area o 857 sf storage area o 3,480 sf office o 3,000 future office area (second floor) 10 employees 17 parking spaces (1 per 2 employees required) ~ 41% landscaped area (15% required) access from Logistics Drive loading area on west side of building Building characteristics include: pre-engineered steel building with cultured stone veneer base, stucco wall materials on western and southern exposures and metal siding panels on the eastern and northern exposures of the building earth-tone colors (beige, brown, tan, bronze) covered entry Page 119 of 125

120 low-pitched metal roof at 1:12 slope; parapet building height: 26 Comment Period The site plan will be reviewed and approved administratively by staff. However, if there are any comments please forward them to the Director of Planning by October 22, 2018 either by or at a regular meeting under the communications section of the agenda. Staff will consolidate any comments received and provide them in a memo to the Town Board in the next meeting packet so that all members can review all of the comments received for each site plan project. Attachments Project narrative Site plan Landscape plan Building elevations Page 2 of 2 Page 120 of 125

121 Total Directional Services Project Narrative Total Directional Services is an existing company that is headquartered in Windsor, Colorado that has outgrown its current facility space and is looking to make a new home at Lot 5, Block 2 of the Windsor Commons Subdivision. The street address for this property is 560 Logistics Drive. The proposed new facility will be a pre-engineered steel building and have approximately 5,663 SF of manufacturing area, 857 SF of storage area and 3,480 SF of office area on the main level and a future office area of approximately 3,000 SF on the upper level. The building will have a total footprint of 10,200 SF and will sit on a 1.00 acre site. There are currently ten total employees working for this company and there are (16) standard parking spaces and (1) handicap parking space being proposed. The building exterior finishes will include cultured stone veneer base with stucco wall materials above on the western and southern exposures and metal siding panels on the eastern and northern exposures of the building. Metal roofing would be provided on a low-slope (1:12). The company acquires, implements, and maintains directional service tools available in the drilling industry manufactures and ships out automotive parts, in particular parts for balancing tires on vehicles. They have extremely limited walk-in business and anticipate less than ten trips from the public on an annual basis. Page 121 of 125

122 4' - 0" 10' - 0" U & D EASEMENT 10' - 0" U & D EASEMENT 4" WIDE PAINTED STRIPE (TYP.) 17' - 0" WINDSOR COMMONS SUBDIVISION, THIRD FILING, LOT 5, BLOCK 2 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL SERVICES 9' - 0" 8' - 0" 9' - 0" 8'-0" MIN AT VAN 20' - 0" STANDARD PARKING STALL 20' - 0" ACCESSIBLE STALL WITH ACCESS AISLE 2' - 8" 10' 0" - 2' - 8" 8' - 8" 3' - 4" 2' - 8" 3" WIDE PAINTED STRIPES AT 3'-0" O.C. INTERNATIONAL ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL PER ICC/ANSI SECTION Paved with asphalt, concrete or pavers 2. Designed so that slope, measured in any direction, and does not exceed a one (I) foot rise to a fifty (50) foot run; 3. Designed so that whenever there is more than a one-half (1/2) inch change in the elevation of the surface between a handicapped accessible route and the handicapped parking space, a ramp shall be provided to connect the route and the parking space. PORTLAND CEMENT HARD COAT STUCCO SYSTEM OVER 8" C.M.U. WALL 6' - 0" 3' - 0" 6' - 0" 6" DIA. CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PIPE BOLLARDS W/ CROWNED TOP- PRIMED & PAINTED SLOPE T.O. CONCRETE EXPANSION JOINT & SEALANT 12" DIAMETER CONCRETE FOUNDATION 13 PARKING STALL STRIPING PIPE BOLLARD AT TRASH ENCLOSURE /8" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" 1/4" = 1'-0" 15' - 4" BALL BEARING BARREL HINGE - (3) PER GATE DOOR - WELD TO 8" DIAMETER STEEL PIPE BOLLARD AND 3"X3" STEEL ANGLE FRAMING. PAINTED RIBBED STEEL METAL GATES - COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING METAL COLOR 3' - 10" 4" 9 Elevation 3 - a 3/16" = 1'-0" 5' - 4" 7 Elevation 5 - a 3/16" = 1'-0" 15' - 4" SLOPED P.T. PLATE PAINTED METAL CAP FLASHING TO MATCH BUILDING 8" BOND BEAM OVER FLASHING WITH 1 - #5 CONTINUOUS 8" x8"x16" STANDARD CMU GROUTED SOLID ABOVE 48" O.C. AND AT CORNERS W/ #9 WIRE JOINT o.c. EXTERIOR WALL STUCCO FINISH SYSTEM OVER 8" x 8" x 16"CMU CONC. BLOCK - COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING #5 32" O.C. AND AT ENDS OF WALLS, 2'-6" PROJECTION, GROUT REINF. CELLS FULL HGT. CULTURED STONE VENEER W/ PRECAST CAP - PROVIDE SAME STONE AND CAP AS USED ON BUILDING 1/2" ISOLATION JOINT AT CONCRETE SLOPE CONCRETE OR FINISH GRADE AWAY AT ALL SIDES, RE: CIVIL 12" CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STEM WALL FOUNDATION W/ 2- # 5 CONT. AT TOP & BOTTOM #5 VERTICLE DOWELS EACH FACE WITH STD HOOK AT 32" O.C. 1'-0" X 3'-0" CONTINUOUS FOOTING W/ 2 #5 CONT. AT BOTTOM 3 3' - 10" 2" 8" DIA. PIPE BOLLARDS STEEL ANGLE FRAME (PAINTED) GATE SECURITY RODS TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0" 2' - 8" 1' - 0" 3' - 0" 8 Elevation 1 - a 3/16" = 1'-0" 4" 6 Elevation 4 - a 3/16" = 1'-0" T.O. CMU 106'-0" T.O. STONE 103'-4" 17' - 4" CONCRETE SLAB 6" THICK, 4,000 PSI, W/ 6x6-10/10 WWM ON 5" CRUSHED STONE (3/4" AGGREGATE). SLAB TO SLOPE AT 1/8" PER FOOT. LEVEL 1 100'-0" 1' - 0" FINISH GRADE 2 PAINTED METAL CAP FLASHING TO MATCH BUILDING METAL COLOR CULTURED STONE W/ PRECAST CAP - PROVIDE SAME STONE AND CAP AS USED ON BUILDING 4 1" = 1'-0" 9" 2' - 6" 3' - 6" CONCRETE PAD WITHIN ENCLOSURE & CONCRETE APRON BEYOND GATES 8" DIAMETER CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PIPE BOLLARD W/ CROWNED TOP - COLOR TO MATCH METAL GATES EXTERIOR WALL STUCCO FINISH SYSTEM OVER 8" x 8" x 16" CMU CONC. BLOCK - COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING CULTURED STONE W/ PRECAST CAP - PROVIDE SAME STONE AND CAP AS USED ON BUILDING 6" DIAMETER CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PIPE BOLLARD W/ CROWNED TOP - COLOR TO MATCH METAL GATES 2 8 PAINTED RIBBED STEEL METAL GATE - COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING METAL COLOR 1' - 2 3/8" CMU CORES GROUTED SOLID AT CORNERS AND AT 32" O.C. (TYPICAL) 2' /4" BIKE RACK DETAIL 1/2" = 1'-0" 6" 6" 6" 1' - 6" PIPE BOLLARD 17' - 4" 2-3/8" ASTM A53 SCHEDULE 40 STEEL PIPE 6" DIA. CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PIPE BOLLARDS W/ CROWNED TOP- PAINT HAZARD YELLOW SLOPE T.O. CONCRETE EXPANSION JOINT & SEALANT CONCRETE PIER ' - 4" 1' - 6" 1/4" = 1'-0" 7' - 0" 6" ABOVE STALL SURFACE 1' - 0" R7-8 2' - 8" 10' - 0" 2' - 8" 8" 8' - 8" 8" ' - 8" R7-201 R78b AT VAN STALLS CENTER SIGN WITHIN PARKING STALL AT INTERIOR END 2" DIAMETER METAL PIPE WHERE WALL- MOUNTING IS NOT PRACTICAL STALL SURFACE 1' - 4" 4' - 0" 4' - 8" 4' - 0" 1' - 4" 8" 3' - 4" 8" 5' - 4" 10' - 0" TRASH ENCLOSURE 3/16" = 1'-0" 7 2 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 8" x8"x16" STANDARD CMU GROUTED SOLID ABOVE 48" O.C. AND AT CORNERS W/ #9 WIRE JOINT O.C. 3'-0" MIN. CORNER LAP BAR TO MATCH HORIZ. REINF. HORIZONTAL REINFORCING CMU CORES GROUTED SOLID AT CORNERS AND AT 32" O.C. (TYPICAL) 4X4X5/16 GALV. STL. ANGLE ANCHORED INTO CMU FULL JAMBS BALL BEARING BARREL HINGE - (3) PER GATE DOOR - WELD TO 8" DIAMETER STEEL PIPE BOLLARD AND 3"X3" STEEL ANGLE FRAMING. 8" DIAMETER CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD, PAINT TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE & CORNER REINFORCING DETAIL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE 2' - 4" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 2' - 4" GRIND ALL WELDS SMOOTH PAINTED RIBBED STEEL METAL GATES x 20 GA. 2"X2" STEEL TUBE FRAME, PAINT 2 2 4' - 8" 12' - 8" 6 PAINTED RIBBED STEEL METAL GATES x 20 GA., TYPE B -COLOR TO MATCH BUILDING METAL COLOR 6" DIAMETER CONCRETE FILLED STEEL PIPE BOLLARD W/ CROWNED TOP - COLOR TO MATCH METAL GATES ' - 0" UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE MONUMENT SIGN BY OWNER UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT VERIFY A MINIMUM OF 5'-0" CLEARANCE FROM EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO DRIVE AISLE, PROVIDE BOLLARDS. THREE 24" RCP (IN) AND THREE 24" RCP (OUT) EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER, RE: CIVIL FOUND MAGNAIL & BRASS TAG LS EXISTING 4'-0" SIDEWALK 24" RCPs INV= INLET #1145 CURB FLOWLINE (E)= CURB FLOWLINE (W)= BOTTOM OF BOX= ' - 0" DRAINAGE EASEMENT 5' - 0" 15' - 0" SMH #1151 RIM= " PVC (W) INV= " PVC (S) INV= " PVC (W) INV= SITE PLAN 1" = 20'-0" SODDED TURF 30' R MULCH 560 LOGISTICS DRIVE LOT 5, BLOCK 2 WINDSOR COMMONS THIRD FILING REC. NO SEEDED NATIVE GRASS 60' R 0.8' WIDE CONCRETE HEADWALL 6" RAISED CONC. CURB W/ 12" WIDE GUTTER, TYP 6' HIGH CMU TRASH ENCLOSURE W/ PAINTED METAL GATES TO MATCH BUILDING, SIDE OF GATES BOLLARD, TYP 67' - 6" 80' - 0" ASPHALT PARKING & DRIVE AISLE SURFACE 24' - 0" 20' - 0" 7' - 0" 30' R 20' R HC RAMP 5' R HC 36' R 24' - 0" 30' R 2 DIMENSIONING OF PARKING AREA IS TO FLOWLINE STRIPED AREA- VAN ACCESSIBLE BOLLARD EA. SIDE OF DOOR 3 3'-6" R 55' R 8' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0" 30' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 0" ' R 20' R HC RAMP RAMP RAMP RAMP RAMP EXIT 16' W X 16' H STEEL INSUL. O.H. DOORS BUILDING MOUNTED HC SIGN (SEE UTILITY PLAN, GRADING PLAN & DRAINAGE PLAN FOR SITE CONDITIONS) 4 2 4' R 6' R RAMP PROPOSED TOTAL DIRECTIONAL SERVICES BUILDING 10,200 S.F. FOOTPRINT 4' R 20' - 4" 20' - 0" 24' - 0" 20' - 0" 7' - 0" EXIT 7 5 4' - 0" 8' - 0" 45' - 0" 63' - 0" 5' - 0" 22' - 0" 7' - 0" NEW SIDE WALK 295' DRIVE LANE EXIT 7' - 0" 25' - 0" 42' - 4" 20' - 0" 29' - 0" 125' - 0" 10' - 0" 32' - 0" SET BACK 30'-0" REQUIRED 4' R SMH #1206 RIM= " PVC (W) INV= " PVC (N) INV= " PVC (S) INV= ' R EXIT 21' - 6" SET BACK 20'-0" REQUIRED SEEDED NATIVE GRASS PATIO SODDED TURF 20' - 0" SPLASH BLOCK, TYP. EXCLUSIVE SANITARY SEWER LINE EASEMENT REC. NO FOUND #4 REBAR W/ RPC LS ' 10' 20' 40' 80' CONCRETE ACCESS FOUND #4 REBAR W/ RPC LS POINT OF TRANSITION TO DRIVE-OVER CURB & GUTTER REVISIONS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEET 2 Page 122 of 125

123 WINDSOR COMMONS SUBDIVISION, THIRD FILING, LOT 5, BLOCK 2 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL SERVICES EXTERIOR FINISH SPECIFICATIONS 1. CULTURED STONE: CULTURED LEDGE STONE VENEER AT BASE OFBUILDING AT SOUTH FACADE AND PORTIONS OF EAST ANDWEST FACADES; (COLOR- BROWN/ TAN MIX) 2. E.I.F.S. STUCCO SYSTEM: STUCCO WALL SYSTEM AT PORTIONS OF WEST, EAST AND SOUTH FACADES; (COLOR- BEIGE) 3. E.I.F.S. STUCCO SYSTEM RELIEF BAND: STUCCO WALL SYSTEM AT WEST, EAST AND SOUTH FACADES; (COLOR- TAN) 4. METAL WALL PANEL: 26 GA. 8" WIDE PRE-FINISHED VERTICAL METAL WALL PANELS BY BUILDING MANUF.; (COLOR- TAN) 5. METAL ROOF PANEL: 26 GA. 24" WIDE PRE-FINISHED STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF PANELS BY BUILDING MANUF.; (COLOR- DARK BRONZE) 6. FASCIA: 26 GA. METAL PRE-FINISHED FASCIA PANELS BY BUILDING MANUF.; (COLOR- DARK BRONZE) 7. SOFFIT AT ENTRY GABLE ROOF: 26 GA. METAL PRE-FINISHED SOFFIT PANELS BY BUILDING MANUF. (COLOR- DARK BRONZE) 8. RAIN GUTTERS / DOWNSPOUTS: 20 GA. METAL PRE-FINISHED GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS BY BUILDING MANUF. (COLOR- DARK BRONZE) 9. ARCHITECTURAL METAL CLADDING: MAIN ENTRY STRUCTURE (COLOR- TAN) 10. PRECAST SILLS: SEALED FINISH; (COLOR- OFF-WHITE) 11. OH METAL DOORS: PRE-FINISHED BY BUILDING MANUF. TO MATCH BUILDING; (COLOR- BEIGE) 12. HOLLOW METAL DOORS: PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING; (COLOR- BEIGE) 13. METAL WINDOWS: PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING; (COLOR- BEIGE) 14. STOREFRONT ALUMINUM WINDOWS: DARK BRONZE 15. ALUMINUM JOINT CLADDING: DARK BRONZE 16. WINDOW GLAZING: BRONZE TINTED GLAZING (VERIFY W/ OWNER) 17. DECORATIVE LIGHTING: (COLOR- DARK BRONZE) REVISIONS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEET 8 Page 123 of 125

124 TOP OF PARAPET 126' - 0" UPPER FLOOR LEVEL 111' - 8" MAIN FLOOR LEVEL 100' - 0" FRONT ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" 10/1/ :31:27 AM TOTAL DIRECTIONAL SERVICES COLOR ELEVATION A EAST 15TH STREET, SUITE 201 LOVELAND, Page 124 COLORADO of

125 4' - 0" 10' - 0" U & D EASEMENT U & D EASEMENT 3'-0" MIN. 10' - 0" WINDSOR COMMONS SUBDIVISION, THIRD FILING, LOT 5, BLOCK 2 TOTAL DIRECTIONAL SERVICES LANDSCAPING NOTES: LANDSCAPING LEGEND: 1. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN SPECIFICATIONS FOR NUMBER ONE GRADE. 2. ALL TURF AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC POP-UP IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL SHRUB BEDS AND TREES TO BE IRRIGATED WITH AN AUTOMATIC DRIP (TRICKLE) IRRIGATION SYSTEM, OR ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO BE ADJUSTABLE TO MEET THE WATER REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL PLANT MATERIAL. HATCHING INDICATES MULCH AREAS ALL TREES AND SHRUBS WILL HAVE WOOD MULCH RING AROUND BASE PER PLANTING DETAILS. 3. ALL TREES TO BE BALLED AND BURLAPPED, ROOT CONTROL BAG, OR CONTAINERIZED. 4. ALL SHRUB BEDS TO BE MULCHED WITH WOOD MULCH (3" AVERAGE DEPTH) ON TYPAR FILTER FABRIC WEED BARRIER. 5. EDGING BETWEEN GRASS AND SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MINIMUM 1/8" x 4" STEEL ROLLED TOP EDGE SET LEVEL WITH TOP OF SOD. 6. CHANGES IN PLANT SPECIES OR PLANT LOCATIONS FROM WHAT IS LISTED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WILL REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF THE TOWN FORESTER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR REPLACEMENT. OVERALL QUANTITY AND QUALITY TO BE CONSISTENT WITH APPROVED PLANS. IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT WITH THE QUANTITIES INCLUDED IN THE PLANT LIST, SPECIES AND QUANTITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED. 7. STREET AND ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL BE PLANTED NO CLOSER THAN FORTY (40) FEET AND FIFTEEN (15) FEET RESPECTIVELY FROM STREET LIGHTS. NO TREES SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN TEN (10) FEET FROM WATER AND SEWER LINES, FOUR (4) FEET FROM GAS, TELEPHONE AND ELECTRICAL UTILITIES, AND TEN (10) FEET FROM ANY DRIVEWAY. HATCHING INDICATES NATIVE SEEDING AREA GRASS SEED MIX: SAND BLUESTEM 20% OR 4.8 LBS OF PURE LIVE SEED PER ACRE. YELLOW INDIAN GRASS 10% OR 1.5 LBS OF PURE LIVE SEED PER ACRE. SWITCH GRASS 25% OR 1.89 LBS OF PURE LIVE SEED PER ACRE. SIDE OATS GRAMA 10% OR 1.35LBS OF PURE LIVE SEED PER ACRE. PRAIRIE SANDREED 15% OR 1.59 LBS OF PURE LIVE SEED PER ACRE. WESTERN WHEAT GRASS 20% OR 2.8 LBS OF PURE LIVE SEED PER ACRE. HATCHING INDICATES NEW SODDED TURF AREAS 560 LOGISTICS DRIVE LOT 5, BLOCK 2 WINDSOR COMMONS THIRD FILING REC. NO SEEDED NATIVE GRASS 7 8. MINIMUM CLEARANCE OF THREE (3) FEET ON EACH SIDE OF FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC). NO VEGETATION OTHER THAN TURF OR GROUND COVERS PLANTED IN FRONT OF FDC. 9. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN'S WATER DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM MUST BE INSTALLED OR SECURED WITH A FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT DEPOSITED WITH THE TOWN PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE BUILDING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHOP DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND RECEIVE APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS COORDINATED WITH THE PLANS DONE BY OTHER CONSULTANTS SO THE PROPOSED GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE, OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT CONFLICT NOR PRECLUDE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS ON THIS PLAN. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION. 11. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS, AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPACTED SHALL BE THOROUGHLY LOOSENED. ORGANIC AMENDMENTS SUCH AS COMPOST, PEAT, OR AGED MANURE SHALL BE THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED AT A RATE OF AT LEAST (3) CUBIC YARDS PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET. 12. TURF GRASS WILL BE SEEDED OR SODDED WITH DROUGHT TOLERANT BLEND. TREES TO BE PLANTED IN TURF AREAS WILL BE INSTALLED WITH AN ORGANIC MULCH RING THAT HAS A RADIUS OF AT LEAST EIGHTEEN 18 INCHES. 13. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE, TOPSOIL THAT IS REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE CONSERVED FOR LATER USE ON AREAS REQUIRING VEGETATION AND LANDSCAPING. 14. FOUNDATION SHRUB BEDS TO BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED AFTER COMPLETION OF BUILDING. 15. CONTACT TOWN OF WINDSOR PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO PLANTING IN ORDER FOR TOWN TO VERIFY PROPER PLANTING. 16. NO SUBSTANTIAL IMPEDIMENT TO VISIBILITY BETWEEN THE HEIGHTS OF THREE (3) FEET AND EIGHT (8) FEET SHALL BE CREATED OR MAINTAINED AT STREET INTERSECTIONS WITHIN A SITE TRIANGLE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EDGES OF THE DRIVING SURFACE, THEN TO FORTY (40) FEET ALONG BOTH INTERSECTING EDGES AND THEN ALONG A TRANSVERSE LINE CONNECTING THESE POINTS. 17. IF PLANTS ARE IN NEED OF REPLACEMENT DUE TO DECLINING HEALTH, DISEASE, OR DEATH, THE PLANTS MUST BE REPLACED WITH THE ORIGINAL SPECIES UNLESS APPROVED BY THE TOWN FORESTER. 18. ALL LANDSCAPING INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REPLACEMENT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. 19. VACUUM BREAKER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE PLUMBING CODES AND REGULATIONS. ALL CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE SET IN STANDARD SIZE VALVE BOXES. 20. FERTILIZE PLANTS WITH 21 GRAM AGRIFORM SLOW RELEASE TABLETS. PLACE TABLETS IN BACKFILL MIX. 21. ANY TREES LOCATED IN CITY STANDARD SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLES CROSSING THE PROPERTY FROM BOTH SIDES OF ANY ACCESSES ONTO CITY STREETS OR WHICH CROSS THE SITE FROM STREET OR ALLEY INTERSECTIONS MUST BE LIMBED UP A MIN. OF 8 FEET ONCE DEEMED TO BE AT A MATURE HEIGHT. ANY BUSHES LOCATED IN THESE CLEAR SIGHT AREAS MUST BE NO HIGHER THAN 30 INCHES. TREES AND BUSHES MUST BE KEPT TRIMMED WHEN THEY ARE LOCATED WITHIN CITY STANDARD SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLES AS IDENTIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "TOWN OF WINDSOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES". 22. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS WILL HAVE WOOD MULCH RING AROUND BASE PER PLANTING DETAILS INCLUDING THOSE INDICATED TO BE LOCATED IN GRAVEL MULCH AREAS." (WOOD MULCH RING FOR TREES IS 4" DEPTH WITH 4 FOOT RADIUS AROUND TREE; MULCH RING AROUND SHRUBS IS 4" DEPTH WITH 3 FOOT RADIUS AROUND SHRUB - SEE PLANTING DETAILS) 23. RESTORE DISTURBED AREAS TO EXISTING CONDITION OR BETTER. 24. AREAS DESIGNATED AS NATIVE GRASS SEED SHALL BE DRILLED WITH NATIVE PRAIRIE 3#/ 1000 SF FROM PAWNEE BUTTES SEED CO GROUND OF SEEDED AREA SHALL BE CULTIVATED LIGHTLY THEN SEEDED IN TWO DIRECTIONS TO DISTRIBUTE THE SEED EVENLY OVER ENTIRE AREA. THE AREA SHALL BE CRIMPED WITH STRAW AFTER SEEDING. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR SEEDED AREAS FOR EROSION CONTROL AND GERMINATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RESEEDING AS NEEDED TO OBTAIN EVEN COVERAGE OF GRASS. PLANTING SCHEDULE TYPE MARK COMMON NAME HEIGHT SPREAD LATIN NAME SIZE COUNT EVERGREENS PP Pinyon Pine 15-25' 15-20' Pinus edulis 6' Tall 1 WF White Fir 50'-60' 20'-25' Abies concolor 6' Tall 1 SHADE TREES BWC Brandywine Crabapple 15'-20' 15'-20' Malus 'Brandywine' 1.5" CAL 3 HB Hackberry 40'-50' 35'-40' Celtis occidentalis 6' Tall 7 WC Western Catalpa 20'-40' 40'-60' Catalpa speciosa 2" CAL 1 SHRUBS CBC Coral Beauty Cotoneaster 1'-3' 4-6' Cotoneaster 'Coral Beauty' 5 Gallon 31 CPB Crimson Pygmy Barberry 18"-24" 2'-3' Berberis thunbergii atropurpurea 'Crimson Pygmy' 5 Gallon 8 EVERGREEN SHRUBS AJ Armstrong Chinese Juniper 3'-4' 4'-5' Juniperus chinensis 'Armstrong' 5 Gallon 11 BJ Armstrong Chinese Juniper 18"-24" 4'-6' Juniperus sabina 'Broadmoor' 5 Gallon 35 ORNAMENTAL GRASSES JBG Japanese Blood Grass 12" -24" 24"-36" Imperata cylindrica rubra 5 Gallon 10 PLANTS BMS Blue Mist Spirea 3'-5' 3'-5' Caryopteris x clandonensis 5 Gallon 17 TREE REQUIREMENTS: IRRIGATED AREA 9,788 S.F. / 750 SF = 13 REQ'D. TREES - PROVIDING 13 SHRUB REQUIREMENTS: IRRIGATED AREA 9,788 S.F. / 750 SF = 13 X 5 = 65 REQ'D. SHRUBS - PROVIDING 85 SOD SHALL BE COLORADO GROWN, 100% CERTIFIED MERION KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS BLEND OF A MIXTURE OF FOUR OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING IMPROVED VARIETIES: BARON ARTISTA RAM I FLYKING PENNSTARR PARADE AMERICA COLUMBIA ADELPHI MIDNIGHT VICTA TOUCHDOWN ALL SODDED AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED W/ AUTO. POP-UP SPRAY SPRINKLER SYSTEM. TREES & SHRUBS TO BE IRRIGATED W/ DRIP SYSTEM. PROVIDE IRRIGATION SLEEVES TO ALL ISOLATED SHRUB, TREE, SODDED AREAS. 10' - 0" UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 6" RAISED CONC. CURB W/ 12" WIDE GUTTER, TYP PROPERTY LINE MONUMENT SIGN BY OWNER UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT EXISTING 4'-0" SIDEWALK 1 SITE DATA: TOTAL BUILDINGS FOOTPRINT 10,200 SF 23.5% HARD SURFACES (PARKING, WALKS & DRIVE AISLE) 15,544 SF 35.5% IRRIGATED SOD 5,021 SF 11.5% MULCH 1,592 SF 3.6% PLANT BEDS 3,175 SF 7.3% SEEDED NATIVE GRASS 8,128 SF 18.6% TOTAL LOT AREA: 20' - 0" DRAINAGE EASEMENT 5' - 0" 15' - 0" MULCH SODDED TURF 1 BWC HB LANDSCAPE PLAN 1" = 20'-0" ZONING: LIMITED INDUSTRIAL 1 13 CBC 43,660 SF 1.0 ACRES 6' HIGH CMU TRASH ENCLOSURE W/ PAINTED METAL GATES TO MATCH BUILDING, SIDE OF GATES 1 WC WF LEGAL DESCRIPTION HC 560 LOGISTICS DRIVE - LOT 5, BLOCK 2, WINDSOR COMMONS SUBDIVISION, THIRD FILING, TOWN OF WINDSOR, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO - REC. NO BJ 10 JBG 6 BMS 8 CBC PP 24' - 0" 2 ASPHALT PARKING & DRIVE AISLE SURFACE 3 1 HB RAMP RAMP RAMP RAMP EXIT O.H. DOOR TRASH ENCLOSURE BUILDING MOUNTED HC SIGN 4 CPB RAMP 5 PROPOSED TOTAL DIRECTIONAL SERVICES BUILDING 1 HB 1 HB 3 BJ 3 BJ AJ 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 4 10,200 S.F. FOOTPRINT 6 BJ EXIT AJ 2 CBC NEW SIDE WALK 5 EXIT 5 1 BJ HB 2 5 CPB 1 BWC HB EXCLUSIVE SANITARY SEWER LINE EASEMENT REC. NO EXIT 21' - 6" SET BACK 20'-0" REQUIRED SEEDED NATIVE GRASS PATIO SPLASH BLOCK, TYP. SODDED TURF 8 CBC 5 BMS 1 BWC 5 BMS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' EXISTING EVERGREEN TREES TO REMAIN REVISIONS SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEET 9 Page 125 of 125