DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE APPROVED MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 PROJECTS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED

Transcription

1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE APPROVED MEETING MINUTES PROJECT NAME PAGE PROJECTS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED * Perrihouse PD *Zen Luxury Living Land Use Plan * Granada PD I Trader Joe's at Parkside DP *Lake Reams Neighborhood PD *Lake Reams Neighborhood PD I Sharp Property PSP *Orangewood (Orangewood Cove- Treasure Cove Vacation Club & Plaza) PD * Grand Oaks Village PD * Eastmar Commons PD * Orange Lake Country Club DRI I DO * Orange Lake Country Club PD * Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD I Parcels SC-11, SC-12, SC-14, SC-15, SC-16 (aka Orchard Hills) PSP *West Lake Hancock Estates PD I West Lake Hancock Estates PSP * Moss Park PD I Parcel E Phase 3 PSP *Grand Cypress Resort PD I Grand Cypress Resort DP *World Gateway PD I World Gateway DP *Sheeler Avenue Townhomes PD I Sheeler Avenue Townhomes PSP I DP NEW PROJECTS * Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge PD I Vineyards Townhomes I The Vineyards Mass Grading DP * Tinwood PD I Regency Village I Home 2 Suites DP * Ginn Property PD I Parcel 2 PSP I Phase 1 Park Site DP * Project ABC PD I Tract 8 - Lot 3C NW Quadrant I Promenade Grande Lakes Apartments DP *Orangewood PD- (Neighborhood 9) I Southcenter- Parcel4A I Q Auto Orlando DP CONSENT AGENDA- DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROV ALS... 45

2 The Development Review Committee met on Wednesday, September 24, 2014, in the first floor conference room, Public Works Building, 4200 South John Young Parkway. John Smogor called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. with a quorum of DRC members present. The DRC Minutes of September 10, 2014, were reviewed and approved with a MOTION by Andres Salcedo, seconded by Joe Kunkel, TO APPROVE THE DRC MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 10, 2014, as amended. MOTION CARRIED. DRC MEMBERS PRESENT FOR DISCUSSION: ChairofDRC Public Works Department Planning Division Utilities Division Utilities Division Zoning Division JOHNSMOGOR JOE KUNKEL ALBERTO VARGAS ANDRES SALCEDO LINDY WOLFE MITCH GORDON LEGAL ADVISOR: County Attorney's Office WHITNEY EVERS COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE REPRESENTATIVE: District 1 LAURA ROBERTS PROJECTS PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED 1. CDR DISTRICT 1 PERRIHOUSE PD Present for discussion were Chuck Whittall, Daniel O'Keefe, Jennifer Stickler, Jay Jackson, Art Wellington, and Amy Schuemann. Andrew Riddle, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. A change determination is being requested to extract the "Phase 2" land area (13.83 acres) from the existing Perrihouse PD. The Phase 2 land area is being processed separately as the Zen Luxury Living Land Use Plan. The applicant was directed to submit Letters of No Objection from the existing property owner(s)

3 MOTION CARRIED. 2. LUP DISTRICT 1 ZEN LUXURY LIVING LAND USE PLAN Present for discussion were Chuck Whittall, Daniel O'Keefe, Jennifer Stickler, Jay Jackson, Art Wellington, and Amy Schuemann. Andrew Riddle, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. The applicant is requesting to extract acres from the existing Perrihouse PD, to convey 0.45 acres of the extracted property to Orange County for a new and realigned segment for Vista Oaks Court right-of-way; and to rezone the remaining acres of the extracted property into the proposed Zen Luxury Living PD Land Use Plan. MOTION by Andres Salcedo, seconded by Joe Kunkel, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ZEN LUXURY LIVING LAND USE PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED AUGUST 28, 2014", subject to the following conditions of approval, including six (6) waivers from Orange County Code, subject to providing documentation that shows attempts of contacting the property owner, and subject to the Perrihouse PD moving forward to the Board of County Commissioners, as an informational item, simultaneously with this request. 1. Development shall conform to the Zen Luxury Living Land Use Plan dated "Received August 28, 2014," and shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities, and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities, and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses, densities, or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities, or intensities. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between a condition of approval of this land use plan and the land use plan dated "Received August 28, 2014," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency. MOTION by Mitch Gordon, seconded by Alberto Vargas, TO APPROVE A NON SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PERRIHOUSE PD LAND USE PLAN TO EXTRACT ACRES (PHASE 2) AND ADD THEM TO THE ZEN LUXURY LIVING LAND USE PLAN, subject to approval of the revised plan date stamped "Received August 28, 2014", subject to a Letter of No Objection from the existing Perrihouse PD property owners, and subject to this project moving forward to the Board of County Commissioners, as an informational item only, simultaneously with the Zen Luxury Living Land Use Plan. -2-

4 2. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 4. The project contains unvested units that are subject to the County's school capacity policy (a/k/a the Martinez Doctrine.) The developer has purchased 162 Owner's Units established under the Capacity Enhancement Agreements by and between McKinney Groves General Partnership and the School Board dated August 29, 2005 (CEA # ), as well as 83 Owner's Units established under the Capacity Enhancement Agreements by and between KB Home Orlando, LLC and the School Board dated August 26, 2005 (CEA #05-019) and as amended on December 12, 2010 and on March 12, The Developer shall comply with all provisions of the Capacity Enhancement Agreements. a. Upon the County's receipt of written notice from OCPS that the developer is in default or breach of the Capacity Enhancement Agreements, the County shall immediately cease issuing building permits for any unvested units. The County may again begin issuing building permits upon Orange County Public Schools' written notice to the County that the developer is no longer in breach or default of the Capacity Enhancement Agreements. The developer and its successor(s) and/or assign(s) under the Capacity Enhancement Agreements shall indemnify and hold the County harmless from any third party claims, suits or actions arising as a result of the cessation of the County's issuance of residential building permits resulting from such notification from OCPS. b. The Developer, and its successor(s) and/or assign(s) under the Capacity Enhancement Agreements, agrees that is shall not claim in any future litigation that the County's enforcement of any of these conditions are illegal, improper, unconstitutional, or a violation of Developer's rights. - 3-

5 c. Orange County shall be held harmless by the Developer and its successor(s) and/or assign(s) under the Capacity Enhancement Agreements, in any dispute between the Developer and OCPS over any interpretation or provision of the Capacity Enhancement Agreements. d. Prior to or concurrently with the County's approval of the plat, documentation shall be provided from Orange County Public Schools that this project is in compliance with the Capacity Enhancement Agreements. 5. The applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal. Nothing in this condition, and nothing in the decision to approve this PD, shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. 6. All acreages identified as conservation areas and buffers are considered approximate until finalized by Conservation Area Determination (CAD) and a Conservation Area Impact (CAl) Permit. Approval of this plan does not permit any conservation impacts. 7. The Developer shall obtain water, wastewater, and reclaimed water service from Orange County Utilities. 8. A Master Utility Plan (MUP) shall be submitted to Orange County Utilities at least thirty (30) days prior to submittal of the first set of construction plans. The MUP must be approved prior to Construction Plan approval. 9. Tree removal/earthwork shall not occur unless and until construction plans for the first Preliminary Subdivision and/or Development Plan with a tree removal and mitigation plan have been approved by Orange County. 10. Short term I transient rental is prohibited. Length of stay shall be for 180 days or greater. 11. The following waivers from Orange County Code are granted: a. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (a) to allow for a maximum height of four (4) stories and sixty (60) feet for multi-family residential buildings located within one hundred ( 1 00) feet of single family zoned property (as measured from the property line of the proposed multi-family development to the nearest property line of single family zoned property); in lieu of a maximum height of a single story when multi-family residential buildings are located within one hundred ( 1 00) feet of single family zoned property. b. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (b) to allow for a maximum height of four (4) stories and sixty (60) feet for multi-family residential buildings located greater than thirty-five (35) feet of single family zoned property, in lieu of the varying maximum multifamily building height requirements that limit fifty percent (50%) of the buildings to three (3) stories and forty ( 40) feet, with the remaining buildings being one (1) story or two (2) stories, when the multi-family buildings are located between one-hundred (100+) feet to one hundred-fifty (150) feet of single family zoned property. - 4-

6 c. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (c) to allow a maximum height of four (4) stories and sixty (60) feet for multi-family residential buildings located greater than thirtyfive (35) feet of single family zoned property, in lieu of a maximum height of three (3) stories and forty (40) feet when the multi-family buildings are located within one hundred fifty (150) feet of single family zoned property. d. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (d) to allow a maximum height of four (4) stories and sixty (60) feet in height, in lieu of a maximum height of three (3) stories and forty ( 40) feet in height. e. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (3) to allow parking and other paved areas for multi-family development to be located at least ten (10) feet from any single family zoned property, in lieu of the requirement that parking and other paved areas for multi-family development be located at least twenty-five (25) feet from any single family zoned property. f. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (g) to allow for a multi-family development to directly access the right-of-way serving platted single-family residential development in lieu of a multi-family development shall not directly access any right-of-way serving platted single-family residential development. 12. Prior to closing, modification, or alteration of the existing Vista Oaks Court (as it exists on September 24, 2014), the Board of County Commissioners shall hold a duly-noticed public hearing in accordance with the procedure set forth in Section , Florida Statutes to consider approving such closure, modification, or alteration. If the Board does not approve such closure, modification, or alteration, the applicant shall be required to submit revised plans to the County. 13. A Use Agreement for utilizing existing right-of-way on Vista Oaks Court shall be required prior to Construction Plan approval. 14. Pole signs and billboards shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with Chapter 31.5 ofthe Orange County Code. 15. Outside sales, storage, and display shall be prohibited. 16. Flagpole design and use shall be as follows and shall be enforced by the Orange County Code Enforcement Board: - Only the United States flag shall be flown; - Flag shall be proportionate to the pole height and width: - The flag and the pole shall be maintained in accordance with proper flag etiquette and in a dignified condition at all times; - Lighting of the flag shall be minimum wattage and broadcast illumination. MOTION CARRIED

7 3. CDR DISTRICT 1 GRANADA PD I TRADER JOE'S AT PARKSIDE DP Present for discussion were Chuck Whittall, Daniel O'Keefe, Jennifer Stickler, Jay Jackson, Art Wellington, and Amy Schuemann. A change determination was requested to the previously approved Trader Joe' s at Parkside DP to re-calculate the required parking based on the ratio for "Shopping Centers up to 50,000 square feet" in lieu of the ratio for "Shopping Centers up to 50,000 square feet" and "Bar I Restaurant". Staff stated that when the development plan was originally approved, the parking calculations were sited on the DP for the retail space for Trader Joe' s and for a restaurant with 72 seats. The parking space calculations which included 3 spaces for the park, rounded out to 95 spaces to support the Trader Joe' s retail square footage and the 72 seat restaurant. The construction plans show an inconsistency with the calculations on the approved DP. The applicant is requesting for staff to consolidate the square footage under the standard shopping center 5Yz spaces per 1,000 square feet ratio, which will allow for approximately 24 more seats under the 95 parking spaces onsite. Staffs concern is that the original approval was segregated to show retail space and a restaurant. The applicant feels that it's a mixed use and that it's not an independent use that would require independent parking demands. Under code the definition of a shopping center is listed as personal establishments, services, and retail sales, whereas restaurants in the parking code, are called out as a separate use from shopping centers. MOTION by Mitch Gordon, seconded by Joe Kunkel, TO CONTINUE THIS ITEM IN ORDER FOR THE APPLICANT TO CONDUCT A PARKING STUDY AND TO MEET WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISIONS PRIOR TO RETURNING TO DRC FOR DECISION. MOTION CARRIED. 4. CDR DISTRICT 1 LAKE REAMS NEIGHBORHOOD PD Present for discussion were Sean Ells, Adam Smith, and Jim Hall. Andrew Riddle, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. A change determination was requested to decrease the number of units within Parcel 5, from 751 to 731, through the use oftwenty (20) Transferable Development Rights (TDR) credits. - 6-

8 MOTION by Mitch Gordon, seconded by Alberto Vargas, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LAKE REAMS NEIGHBORHOOD PD LAND USE PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED AUGUST 22, 2014", TO DECREASE THE NUMBER OF UNITS WITHIN PARCEL 5 FROM 751 TO 731 THROUGH THE USE OF TWENTY (20) TDR CREDITS, subject to the following conditions of approval. 1. Development shall conform to the Lake Reams Neighborhood Center PD Land Use Plan Amendment dated "Received August ," and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws. ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities, and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities, and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinances and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses, densities, or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities or intensities. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between a condition of approval of this zoning and the land use plan dated "Received August ," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency. 2. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written. was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3. Pursuant to Section Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 4. An updated Master Utility Plan (MUP) shall be approved by Orange County Utilities at least thirty (30) days prior to the first set of construction plans. The MUP must be approved prior to Construction Plan approval. - 7-

9 5. The lot grading plan for 32-foot wide single-family detached lots (and similar narrow lots) shall include design features to ensure positive drainage from the side yard to the front roadway or rear alley. These design features may include, (ill A/C units on same side of homes so that A/C units are not located adjacent to each other,.(hl A/C units on same side placed at high elevation point of side yard so that drainage flows away from the A/C units to the front roadway or rear alley,.(0 AIC units located behind the home when garage is detached from the other lot grading plan approved.qy the County Engineer. 6. The TDR Agreement as submitted provides for ~ reduction of twenty (20) units within Parcel J_ ofthe Lake Reams Neighborhood PD for~ total of731 units. 7. Except as amended, modified, and L or superseded, the following BCC Conditions of Approval, dated July 1Q, 2013, shall mmlr a. Development shall conform to the Lake Reams Neighborhood PD Land Use Plan dated "Received May 15, 2013," and shall comply u-ith all applicable federal, state and county lewis, ordinances and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities and intensities conforming Vlith the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state and county laws, ordinance and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county hwt's, ordinances or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achie 1e or obtain desired uses, densities or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any..vaivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities or intensities. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency bet\veen a cond-ition of approval of this zoning and the land use plan dated "Recei 1ed May 14, 20 13," the condition of appro 1al shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency : THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #1 b. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal la\v. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of de 1elopment : THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #3-8-

10 c. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (a)(l) is granted to allow accessory dwelling units within PD Parcel 6 only to not be counted towards required density calculations. d. The following waivers from Orange County Code are granted and applicable for PD Parcel 18 only: 1. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (b)(2) to allow a mmrmum average lot size of 6,500 square feet, in lieu of a minimum average lot size of 7,200 square feet; and 2. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (g)(2) to allow the use of a cul-desac as an acceptable method of street termination. 8. All previous applicable BCC Conditions of approval, dated March 13, 2013, shall apply: a. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or othenvise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing \Yhere this development was approved, v.rhere such promise or representation, whether oral or \Witten, Vt'as relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could htwe reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a promise or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it 'Nas expressly made to the Board at a public hearing vihere the development was considered or approved : THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #2 b. The applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a capacity reservation certificate prior to certificate of occupancy. Nothing in this condition and nothing in the decision to approve this development plan shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. c. All acreages regarding conservation areas and wetland buffers are considered approximate until finalized by a Conservation Area Determination (CAD) and a Conservation Area Impact (CAl) Permit. Approval of this plan does not authorize any direct or indirect conservation area impacts. d. Unless a Conservation Area Impact (CAl) permit is approved by Orange County consistent with Chapter 15 prior to Construction Plan approval, no conservation area or buffer encroachments shall be permitted. - 9-

11 e. The developer shall be responsible for building master utilities transmission and collection infrastructure adequate to serve the PD and to accommodate the ultimate flows for the entire Village (SAP). f. The Developer shall obtain water, wastewater and reclaimed water service from Orange County Utilities. g..an updated Master Utility Plan (MUP) shall be appro'yed by Orange County Utilities prior to construction plan approyal /2014: THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #4 9. All previous applicable BCC Conditions of Approval, dated August 7, 2012, shall apply: a. A road agreement for the conveyance of the right-of-way required for Reams Road and Ficquette Road, pursuant to the Reams Road Alignment Study dated July 2005, is required to be in place prior to PSP approval for any parcels in which such right-of-way is located. b. Unless a Conservation Area Impact (CAl) permit is approved by Orange County consistent with Chapter 15 prior to Construction Plan approval, Mass Grading Plan approval or earthwork, no conservation area or buffer encroachments shall be permitted. c. The developer shall be responsible for building master utilities transmission and collection infrastructure adequate to serve the PD and to accommodate the ultimate flows for the entire Village ((Specific Area Plan) SAP). d. The following four (4) waivers are granted for ParcelS (Village Home District): 1) From Section (b)(2) to decrease the minimum average lot size from 4,800 square feet to 3,840 square feet for lots less than 40' wide; 2) From Section (b)(4) to decrease the minimum lot width from 40' to 32' for single family detached dwellings; 3) From Section 1386(b)(8)(a) to reduce the minimum front porch setback from 10' to 7' within lots less than 40' wide; and 4) From Section 1386(b)(8)(b) to decrease the mmtmum side building setback from 5' to 4' within lots less than 40'. e. Billboards, pole signs, and outdoor storage are prohibited

12 f. At the time of approval of a plat for a single-family residential unit project, the developer shall have prepared and submitted for review a document containing covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) for the property being platted. The CC&Rs, which shall be recorded simultaneous with the recording of the plat, shall include a provision incorporating, verbatim, the following requirements: 1) The same front fa9ade for single family residential units may not be repeated more than five (5) times within one (1) block length for both sides of any street, and shall be separated by at least two (2) units with different facades. 2) House front facades shall be varied and articulated to provide visual interest to pedestrians along the street frontage. The front fa9ade of the main body of the house shall not exceed (40) feet in length, except for wings or "L's", which are setback from the fa9ade. In no case shall more than fifty (50) percent of the front fa9ade of the house consist of an unobstructed block wall or garage door. 3) At least fifty (50) percent of all single-family residential units shall have a front porch. A front porch shall be a minimum of seven (7) feet in depth and cover a minimum ten (10) feet in with or one third (1/3) of the front fa9ade, whichever is greater. 4) Flat roofs shall be prohibited. 5) Unless otherwise prohibited by the CC&Rs, fencing in the front yard shall be no higher than three (3) feet, six (6) inches and limited to decorative wrought iron or wood picket style. 6) The provisions of the CC&R's incorporating the above referenced requirements shall not be amended, removed or superseded without the prior approval of the Board of County Commissioners, which approval may be withheld in the Board's sole discretion, and the CC&R's shall contain a statement to that effect. Furthermore, the CC&R's shall provide that the homeowner's association and any person owning the property in the development have the right to enforce these requirements in the event they are violated. 7) Finally, the CC&Rs shall also state that Orange County shall have the right, but not the duty, to enforce these requirements in the same manner as it enforces other Orange County ordinances and regulations. g. Tree removal/earthwork shall not occur unless and until construction plans for the first Preliminary Subdivision and/or Development Plan with a tree removal and mitigation plan have been approved by Orange County. 10. All previous applicable BCC Conditions of Approval dated January 10, 2012, shall apply: a. Applicable to Parcel 2 only, the following waivers from the original version of the Horizon West Village Code are granted:

13 1) A waiver from Sections (g)(3)(d) and (b)(10) to allow the first floor elevations to be twelve (12) inches above the finished grade of the sidewalk in lieu of eighteen (18) inches above the finished grade ofthe sidewalk; 2) A waiver from Section (a)(3)(c) to allow parking on New Reams Road and the New Connector Road. Parking may be provided on the sides of the buildings provided the stalls are screened with 36" knee walls with caps and landscaping; 3) A waiver from Section (b)(5) to allow an increase in the maximum building height to three (3) stories and forty five (45) feet in lieu of forty (40) feet, and 4) A waiver from Sections (b)(11) and (e) to modify the porch requirements as follows: Front porches (i.e., covered entrances at the breezeways) will only be required for each building fronting a public right of-way (southern connector road and Lake Village Road. b. The following waivers for Multi-Family residential are granted: 1) A waiver from Sections (a), (b), and (c) to allow three (3) story multi-family buildings to be located within eighty (80) feet of single-family zoned property, and 2) A waiver from Section ) to allow for a mm1mum building separation of twenty (20) feet for two-story and three-story buildings, in lieu of thirty (30) feet and forty ( 40) feet, respectively. c. A waiver from Section is granted to allow for a minimum front setback from twenty-five (25) and thirty-five (3 5) feet to fifteen ( 15) feet. d. A waiver from Sections (a) and to allow for a maximum oftwenty-five (25) on-street parking spaces to be located on the same side of the property line in lieu of being located on the same lot or within three hundred (300) feet from the principal entrance. These twenty-five (25) spaces may be used to meet the minimum parking requirement for this development. 11. All previous applicable Conditions of Approval dated October 4, 2011, shall apply, including: a. At the time Parcel 1 or any portion of Parcel 1 is platted or a development plan is submitted, the adequate public facilities parkway and road right-of-way which is comprised of 1 segment ( 4 lanes as more fully described below), as generally depicted on the amended Land Use Plan (LUP) shall be conveyed to Orange County for road right-of-way purposes. However, notwithstanding how the subject road right-of-way is generally depicted on the amended LUP, the actual alignment of the segment of the newly constructed portion of Reams Road lying between the Frye Property north of the property line of the Lake Reams (Planned Development) PD and the roundabout shall be shown on the exhibits, that are concurrently introduced

14 b. The developer shall construct or have constructed the segment of the road (the first 2 lanes) from the roundabout to C.R. 535 upon issuance of the first Certificate of Completion of subdivision improvements the effect of which is to allow development of Parcel 2, or any portion thereof (the segment is described as a connection point to the realigned Reams Road extending southwest from C.R. 535 to the roundabout on the newly constructed portion of Reams Road). c. The developer shall construct or have constructed the segment of the road (the first 2 lanes) at the occurrence of any of the following events, whichever happens first: The developer shall construct or have constructed the segment of the road (the first 2 lanes) at the occurrence of any of the following events, whichever happens first: 1) Issuance of the first Certificate of Completion of subdivision improvements allowing development on Parcel 1 or 2 of the Lake Reams PD; or 2) When the following events occur: 1. Issuance of the First Certificate of Completion of subdivision improvements allowing development of residential units (single-family or multi-family) in Parcel 1 or 2; and 11. Opening of the middle school in Lakeside Village; or 111. Opening ofthe elementary school on Parcell I ofthe Lake Reams PD Property. 3) Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Completion for any commercial development on Parcel 1, the second 2 lanes of segment 1 from the roundabout to C.R. 535 shall be constructed. 12. All previous applicable Conditions of Approval dated August 23, 2011, March 15, 2005 and August 25, 1998 shall apply, including: a. Liquor stores and video arcades are prohibited in the neighborhood commercial portion. b. Section C.l of Ordinance shall be waived concerning block length. The block length for lots less than 60 feet shall be up to 540 feet in length where the lots at the end of the block are perpendicular to the intersecting street. c. Block length shall be measured from the street crossing, public open space, or alley intersection. Variation in the block length shall be permitted where the variation will create a public open space or when it will allow continuation of an adjacent public open space. d. TDRs (Transfer of De relopment Rights) BFe approved with this plan subject to compatibility criteria as specified on the Land Use Plan

15 09/ : THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #6 MOTION CARRIED. 5. CDR DISTRICT 1 LAKE REAMS NEIGHBORHOOD PD I SHARP PROPERTY (PHASE 3) PSP Present for discussion were Sean Ells, Adam Smith, and Jim Hall. David Pearce, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. A change determination was requested to decrease the number of units within Phase 3 of Parcel 5, from 751 to 731. Public Works stated their concern with the 32' wide lots. MOTION by Andres Salcedo, seconded by Joe Kunkel, TO APPROVE A NON-SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SHARP PROPERTY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED AUGUST 22, 2014", TO REVISE THE LOT MIX WITHIN PARCEL 5 CONSISTENT WITH THE LAKE REAMS NEIGHBORHOOD PD LAND USE PLAN BY REDUCING THE NUMBER OF UNITS WITHIN PHASE THREE OF THE PSP, FROM 751 TO 731, subject to this approval not being effective until 30 days after BCC approval of the Lake Reams Neighborhood PD for Parcel 5. MOTION CARRIED. 6. CDR DISTRICT 1 ORANGEWOOD-ORANGEWOODCOVEPD Present for discussion were Amr Gawad and Bruce E. Elliott. Andrew Riddle, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. A Change Determination Request (CDR) to retain existing development entitlements for up to 60,000 square feet of retail uses and add a maximum of five hundred (500) standard hotel rooms or two-hundred fifty (250) lock-out time share rooms; while increasing the maximum building height for hotel or timeshare uses only from sixty (60') feet to one hundred twenty-five (125 ') feet and eleven (11) stories. In addition, the applicant has updated the PD trip conversion matrix by reflecting the uses of retail, hotel, and time share only, and eliminating the previously approved uses of "assisted living facility" and "medical office". No waivers from Orange County Code have been requested

16 MOTION by Alberto Vargas, seconded by Joe Kunkel, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ORANGEWOOD PD ORANGEWOOD COVE LAND USE PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED AUGUST 27, 2014", TO RETAIN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENTS FOR UP TO 60,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL USES AND ADD A MAXIMUM OF FIVE HUNDRED (500) STANDARD HOTEL ROOMS OR TWO-HUNDRED FIFTY (250) LOCK-OUT TIME SHARE ROOMS; WHILE INCREASING THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FOR HOTEL OR TIMESHARE USES ONLY FROM SIXTY (60') FEET TO ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE (125') FEET AND ELEVEN (11) STORIES, subject to the following conditions of approval. 1. Development shall conform to the Orangewood PD I Orangewood Cove Land Use Plan dated "Received August 27, 2014," and shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities, and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities, and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses, densities, or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities, or intensities. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between a condition of approval of this land use plan and the land use plan dated "Received August 27, 2014," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency. 2. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development

17 4. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a capacity reservation certificate prior to issuance of the initial certificate of occupancy. Nothing in this condition and nothing in the decision to approve this development plan shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. 5. All acreages identified as conservation areas and wetland buffers are considered approximate until finalized by a Conservation Area Determination (CAD) and a Conservation Area Impact (CAl) Permit. Approval of this plan does not authorize any direct or indirect conservation area impacts. 6. The developer shall obtain water and wastewater service from Orange County Utilities. 7. Prior to construction plan approval, hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to Orange County Utilities demonstrating that proposed water and wastewater systems have been designed to support all development within the PD. 8. Pole signs and billboards shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with Chapter 31.5 ofthe Orange County Code (Tourist Commercial). 9. Outside sales, storage, and display shall be prohibited. 10. The maximum building height for any hotel or time share use shall be limited to one-hundred twenty-five (125) feet and eleven (11) stories. The maximum building height for all other uses shall be sixty (60) feet, or thirty-five (35) feet within one-hundred feet of single family residential. 11. Tree removal/earthwork shall not occur unless and until construction plans for the first Preliminary Subdivision Plan and/or Development Plan with a tree removal and mitigation plan have been approved by Orange County. 12. Except as amended, modified, and I or superseded, the following BCC Conditions of Approval, dated August 23, 1994, shall apply: a. Development shall eonform to the Orangev10od Co ;e Land Use Plan Amendment, dated "Reeeived June 6, 1994," and to the following eonditions of approval. Development based upon this approval shall eomply with all other applieable federal, state, and eounty laws, ordinanees and regulations, 'Nhieh are ineorporated herein by referenee, e~feept to the extent [the applieable lwns, ordinanees, and regulations] are expressly wai ;ed or modified by these eonditions, or by aetion approved the Orange County Board of County Commissioners, or by aetion of the Board of County Commissioners. 09/24/2014: THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #1-16-

18 b. The proposed median opening and access location are not approved with this plan and shall be determined at development plan submittal. c. To the extent required to comply with the consistency provlslons of the Growth Management Act, the following conditions shall be added to the conditions of approval: 1. Commercial land uses shall be limited to those stated in Policy of the International Drive Activity Center Plan. Furthermore, Policy of the International Drive Activity Center Plan dealing with prohibited uses shall apply to development approvals. 2. If the housing linkage program is in place prior to development approval, development of nonresidential development shall be conditioned upon the development of residential units within the area designated as Activity Center Residential on the Future Land Use Map. Past affordable housing efforts by the developer shall be recognized in any housing linkage program. 3. The Development Guidelines of the International Drive Activity Center shall apply to the subject property if they are established prior to development plan submittal, including but not limited to lighting standards, site regulations, open space regulations, trip reduction program, access management controls, transit access design standards, building orientation and location of parking lots. 4. The property owner shall be required to participate in a property owners' association upon its creation. 5. Stormwater management facilities shall be designed as an aesthetic feature, except where determined by the County engineer to be technically unfeasible. 6. A 20-foot wide pedestrian/landscape/utility easement plus a 15-foot wide transit easement along International Drive for a total of 35 feet (with the transit easement along International Drive) shall be included in the development plan. 7. The development plan may provide for interconnection of adjacent developments either by cross-access easements or public right-of-way. 8. Sidewalks may be a minimum of 10-foot wide along International Drive. 9. Participation in a shuttle service connecting area attractions, major transportation centers, and on-site development shall be required. MOTION CARRIED

19 7. CDR DISTRICT 1 GRAND OAKS VILLAGE PD Eric Raasch, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. This item was continued from the August 13, 2014 DRC meeting in order for staff to hold a community meeting. The community meeting was held on September 16, 2014, and staff stated that approximately 25 residents I property owners were in attendance. A majority of attendees indicated that the County should either modify the condition to permit liquor stores, or at the very least allow for the continued operation of the existing liquor store. However, a few attendees strongly expressed that the existing condition should be enforced, and that actions should be taken to hold both staff and the developer accountable for the error. MOTION by Mitch Gordon, seconded by Alberto Vargas, TO RECOMMNED APPROVAL OF A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED GRAND OAKS VILLAGE PD LAND USE PLAN, TO MODIFY BCC CONDITION OF APPROVAL #12, TO ELIMINATE "LIQUOR STORES" FROM THE LIST OF PROHIBITED COMMERCIAL (C-1) USES, subject to the following conditions of approval. 1. Development shall conform to the Grand Oaks Village PD Land Use Plan dated "Received May.t. 2003," and shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified.by any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities, and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities, and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified.by any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses, densities, or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities, or intensities. In the event of f! conflict or inconsistency between f! condition of approval of this land use plan and the land use plan dated ~ Received May.t. 2003," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency. 2. This project shall comply with, adhere ~ and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made.by the applicant.(m: authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon.by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon.by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, f! "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board.by the applicant.(m: authorized agent) if i1 was expressly made to the Board at f! public hearing where the development was considered or approved

20 3. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit.qy the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain ~ permit from ~ state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed.qy ~ state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in ~ violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 4. Except as amended, modified, and Lor superseded, the following BCC Conditions of Approval, dated July~ 2003, shall rumoc a. Development shall conform to the LUP, dated "Received May 8, 2003," and to the following conditions of approval. Development based upon this appro ral shall comply with all other applicable federal, state, and coooty laws, ordinances, and regulations, w-hich are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent the applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations are expressly v.'aived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the Board of Col:Hlty Commissioners (BCC), or by action of the BCC : THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #1 b. The uses, densities, and intensities, and all of the conditions of approval of the PD/LUP have been negotiated and agreed to by both the applicant and the Col:Hlty. The PDlLUP constitutes an agreement between the parties. The applicant and the applicant's successors in interest have the contract right to de relop the PD with the uses, densities, and intensities approved by the Col:Hlty, subject to the restrictions and requirements in the conditions of approval, and neither the applicant nor the County shall hwre the right to rezone or dovmzone the property, or otherwise alter the uses, densities, and intensities, or to delete, waive, or amend any condition of approval except through an amendment to the PDILUP that is negotiated by both parties : THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #2 c. Phase 2 is restricted to single-story only. d. Pole signs, portable signs, and billboards are prohibited. e. Stormwater management system shall comply with the subdivision regulations and the developer' s agreement between Orange County and the developer. f. The developer shall obtain wastewater and water service from Orange County subject to County rate resolutions and ordinances. g. Prior to construction plan approval, the developer shall agree to utilize reclaimed water for landscape and green area irrigation

21 h. Twenty-foot tall trees on 25-foot centers shall be installed along the south boundary of Winderwood and the west boundary of Wind wood Subdivision. 1. Grand Oaks Village agrees to adopt a median and use reclaimed water both on Conroy Windermere Road and Dr. Phillips Boulevard. J. Lighting shall be non-obtrusive to adjoining residential areas, and shall comply with current County Code. k. Phase 2 shall consist of 20,000 square feet of retail and 15,000 square feet of office. 1. Retail uses shall be restricted to Retail Commercial District (C-1) uses only. In addition, gas stations, auto parts stores, automobile repair businesses or stores selling auto parts requiring installations, convenience stores, liquor stores, and restaurants with drive-thru facilities shall be prohibited. m. The permitted office uses shall be those uses permitted and those uses allowed as a special exception in the Professional Office District (PO). n. All parking areas shall be hand swept. Mechanical sweeping of the parking lots shall be prohibited. o. Pickup, deliveries and dumpster servicing shall be limited to the hours of between 7 a.m. and 9p.m. p. Access to the site is limited as shown on the LUP. q. No parcels shall be developed with a drive-thru lane (or lanes) in conjunction with a fastfood restaurant or a fast-food restaurant without a drive-thru lane (or lanes). The term "fastfood restaurant" means and refers to a restaurant which prepares and serves what is commonly referred to as "fast food," examples of which are McDonald's, Wendy's, Burger King, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and similar such restaurants. Outdoor speakers/indoor microphone ordering systems shall be prohibited. The phrase "drive-thru lane" is intended to mean and refer to a traffic lane utilized by patrons who order at the premises and take delivery of prepared fast food without leaving their vehicle. The foregoing prohibition concerning a drive-thru lane or lanes is not intended to be applicable to an establishment other than a fast-food restaurant; for example, drive-thru lanes of a drugstore, dry cleaner, bank or other financial institution are not intended to be prohibited. Moreover, the foregoing provisions are not intended to prohibit the installation of a pick-up window or the establishment of a designated delivery point adjacent to a restaurant other than a fast-food restaurant at which restaurant employees may deliver prepared food to customers placing orders for such food from an off site location; an example of such a pick-up window is that commonly used by Donatos Restaurants and examples of such a designated delivery area are those commonly utilized by Outback Steakhouse, Olive Garden, and Red Lobster as well as Stonewood Tavern and Grill which is open and operating on Phase I of Grand Oak Village. -20-

22 Finally, the foregoing restrictions are not intended to prohibit any restaurant without a drivethru lane (or lanes). MOTION CARRIED. 8. CDR DISTRICT 4 EASTMAR COMMONS PD Present for discussion were Juli James, Erika Hughes, and Jim Hall. Andrew Riddle, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. A change determination was requested to incorporate the following waivers from Orange County Code: 1. A waiver from Section (d) to allow for a maximum multi-family building height of three (3) stories and fifty feet (50), in lieu of the requirement that precludes multi-family building heights in excess of three (3) stories or forty feet (40'); and 2. A waiver from Section ) to allow for a minimum separation of twenty feet (20') between three (3) story multi-family buildings, in lieu of a minimum separation of forty feet (40') between three (3) story multi-family buildings. MOTION by Alberto Vargas, seconded by Joe Kunkel, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EASTMAR COMMONS PD LAND USE PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 10, 2014", TO ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING HEIGHT OF THREE STORIES AND FIFTY FEET AND TO ALLOW FOR A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF TWENTY FEET BETWEEN THREE STORY MULTI-FAMILY BUILDINGS, subject to the following conditions of approval, including waivers from Orange County Code. 1. Development shall conform to the Eastmar Commons PD Land Use Plan dated "Received September lq. 2014," and shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified hy any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities, and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities, and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified hy any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses. densities, or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities, or intensities. In the event of~ conflict or inconsistency between ~ condition of approval of this land use plan and the land use plan dated "Received September lq. 2014," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency

23 2. This project shall comply with, adhere 1Q.,_ and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made.by the applicant.(m: authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon.by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon.by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition,~ "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board.by the applicant.(m: authorized agent) if i! was expressly made to the Board at ~ public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3. Pursuant to Section Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit.by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain ~ permit from ~ state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed.by~ state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in~ violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 4. The following waivers from Orange County Code are granted: a. A waiver from Section (d) to allow for~ maximum multi-family building height of three ill stories and fifty feet~ in lieu of the requirement that precludes multi-family building heights in excess of three ill stories or futly feet (40'); and b. A waiver from Section (j) to allow for~ minimum separation of twenty feet GQ) between three ill story multi-family buildings, in lieu of~ minimum separation of futly feet (40') between three ill story multi-family buildings. 5. Except as amended, modified, and Lor superseded, the following BCC Conditions of Approval dated June , shall rum1y.;. -22-

24 a. Development shall eonform to the Eastmar Commons PD Land Use Plan dated "ReeeiYed Mareh: 31, 20 14," and shall eomply with: all applieable federal, state and emmty laws, ordinanees and regulations, exeept to the extent that any applieable eol:lfity laws, ordinanees or regulations are expressly waiyed or modified by any of these eonditions. Aeeordingly, the PD may be developed in aeeordanee with: the uses, densities and intensities deseribed in sueh: Land Use Plan, subjeet to those uses, densities and intensities eonforming v.ith: the restrietions and requirements found in the eonditions of approval and eomplying 'Nith: all applieable federal, state and eol:lfity laws, ordinanee and regulations, exeept to the extent that any applieable eounty laws, ordinanees or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these eonditions. If the deyelopment is ooable to aehieve or obtain desired uses, densities or intensities, the Col:lfity is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifieations to enable the developer to aeh:ieve or obtain those desired uses, densities or intensities. In the event of a eonfliet or ineonsisteney bet\veen a eondition of approval of this zoning and the land use plan dated "Reeeiv:ed Mareh: 31, 20 14," the eondition of approval shall eontrol to the extent of sueh: eonfliet or ineonsisteney. 09/24/2014: THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #1 b. This projeet shall eomply with:, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise eonfliet with: any Yerbal or vnitten promise or representation made by the applieant (or authorized agent) to the Board of Col:lfity Commissioners at the publie hearing where this development was approved,.vhere sueh: promise or representation, whether oral or \Witten, was relied upon by the Board in approving the de't'elopment, eould have reasonably been expeeted to h:a>re been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or eould have reasonably indueed or otherwise influeneed the Board to approve the deyelopment. For pl:hposes of this eondition, a "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to h:a>re been made to the Board by the applieant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a publie hearing.vhere the de relopment v1as eonsidered or approved. 09/24/2014: THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #2 c. Pursuant to Seetion , Florida Statutes, issuanee of this development permit by the County does not in any way ereate any rights on the part of the applieant to obtain a permit from a state or federal ageney and does not ereate any liability on the part of the County for issuanee of the permit if the applieant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal ageney or oodertakes aetions that result in a violation of state or federal la>n. Pursuant to Seetion , the applieant shall obtain all other applieable state or federal permits befure eommeneement of development. 09/ : THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #3-23-

25 d. The applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal. Nothing in this condition, and nothing in the decision to approve this land use plan amendment, shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. e. All acreages regarding conservation areas and wetland buffers are considered approximate until fmalized by a Conservation Area Determination (CAD) and a Conservation Area Impact (CAl) Permit. Approval of this plan does not authorize any direct or indirect conservation area impacts. f. Within PD Parcel 3, Multi-family residential shall be limited to a maximum of 380 dwelling units on a maximum of 19 acres and commercial shall be limited to a maximum of 45,000 square feet; however, the combined development program shall be limited to the maximum number of 4,689 new daily trips and 424 new PM peak hour trips addressed by the approved traffic study. g. Billboards, portable signs and pole signs shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with Chapter h. Tree removal I Earthwork shall not occur unless and until Construction Plans for the first Preliminary Subdivision and I or Development Plan with a tree removal and mitigation plan have been approved by Orange County. 1. Outdoor sales, storage and display shall be prohibited. J. The following Education Condition of Approval shall apply: 1. Developer shall comply with all provision of the Capacity Enhancement Agreement (#OC ) entered into with the Orange County School Board as of February 25, Upon the County's receipt of written notice from Orange County Public Schools that the developer is in default or breach of the Capacity Enhancement Agreement, the County shall immediately cease issuing building permits for any residential units in excess of the 0 residential units allowed under the zoning existing prior to the approval of the PD zoning. The County shall again begin issuing building permits upon Orange County Public Schools' written notice to the County that the developer is no longer in breach or default of the Capacity Enhancement Agreement. The developer and its successor(s) and I or assign(s) under the Capacity Enhancement Agreement, shall indemnify and hold the County harmless from any third party claims, suits, or actions arising as a result of the act of ceasing the County's issuance of residential building permits. -24-

26 3. Developer, or its successor(s) and I or assign(s) under the Capacity Enhancement Agreement, agrees that it shall not claim in any future litigation that the County's enforcement of any of these conditions are illegal, improper, unconstitutional, or a violation of developer's rights. 4. Orange County shall be held harmless by the developer and its successor(s) and I or assign(s) under the Capacity Enhancement Agreement, in any dispute between the developer and Orange County Public Schools over any interpretation or provision of the Capacity Enhancement Agreement. At the time of platting, documentation shall be provided from orange County Public Schools that this project is in compliance with the Capacity Enhancement Agreement. 6. All previous conditions of approval from April 1, 1985 shall apply: a. Access rights along Dean Road shall be dedicated to Orange County, except at the approved entrance. b. The proposed plan identified two Conservation Areas on the site. The Planning Department has performed a preliminary field inspection of these areas and determined that the areas are larger than shown on the plan. Additional information regarding the location of wetland vegetation and soils (including muck probes), must be provided with the Development Plan for these areas so that the precise boundaries can be established. Development rights over all Conservation Areas shall be dedicated to Orange County. e. The applicant's request for 17 DU/Aere for garden apartments shall exclude all Conservation Areas. This may result in fewer units than sho'+vn on the Land Use Plan. 09/ : THE PRECEDING CONDITION IS NO LONGER APPLICABLE d. The developer shall obtain water service from Orange County subject to County Resolutions and Ordinances. The developer has 50,000 GPO of waste Nater capacity in the Eastern Sub regional (Permit No. 0118), upon completion ofthe Phase III improvements. e. The developer shall obtain wastewater service from Orange County subject to County Resolutions and Ordinances. f. Prior to any development plan approval, the developer shall submit a master water/wastewater plan to Orange County Public Utilities for review and approval. g. Prior to any development plan approval, the entranceways for this property and the adjoining property shall be approved by the Orange County Engineering Department. MOTION CARRIED. -25-

27 9. D DISTRICT 1 ORANGE LAKE COUNTRY CLUB DRI I DO Present for discussion were Gregory Lee, Arthur Baker, Geoff McNeill, Mohammed Abdallah, and Randy June. A Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) was requested to the Orange Lake Country Club Development of Regional Impact (DRI) to revise the phasing dates for Phase 3 through 2023 and Phase 4 through 2028 and to reflect the changes requested to the Orange Lake Country Club PD Land Use Plan. MOTION by Alberto Vargas, seconded by Joe Kunkel, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE EIGHTH RESTATED AND AMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR ORANGE LAKE COUNTRY CLUB DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT, subject to scheduling this item on the BCC Consent the same day as the substantial change to the Orange Lake Country Club PD Land Use Plan. MOTION CARRIED. 10. CDR DISTRICT 1 ORANGELAKECOUNTRYCLUBPD Present for discussion were Gregory Lee, Arthur Baker, Geoff McNeill, Mohammed Abdallah, and Randy June. Daniel Kilponen, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. A change determination was requested to reflect the following changes: 1) Revise the cover sheet to modify the legal description, parcel identification numbers and development team, 2) To revise Hartzog Road alignment and access points, 3) To add a new trip conversion matrix, 4) To extend the phasing dates for Phase 3 through 2023 and for Phase 4 through 2028, 5) To remove water and wastewater demands, 6) To add a note that indicates that up to 25,000 square feet of retail uses and 400 hotel rooms may be located in the North Village, 7) To revise "Timeshare" land use as "Timeshare I Short Term Rental"; -26-

28 8) To add notes to indicate that short-term rental setbacks shall meet minimum requirements of Chapter 38 and shall be identified for each short term rental type on the PSP; and for alley design, including minimum width, signage, turning radius, driveway aprons, and garage setbacks, and that alleys shall be designed as a private easement. MOTION by Alberto Vargas, seconded by Joe Kunkel, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ORANGE LAKE COUNTRY CLUB PD LAND USE PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 9, 2014", TO ADD A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT STATES THE LENGTH OF STAY FOR SHORT TERM RENTALS SHALL NOT EXCEED 179 DAYS, and subject to the following conditions of approval. 1. Development shall conform to the Orange Lake Country Club Land Use Plan dated "Received September 2_,_ 2014," and shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified Qy any of these conditions. Accordingly, the PD may be developed in accordance with the uses, densities, and intensities described in such Land Use Plan, subject to those uses, densities, and intensities conforming with the restrictions and requirements found in the conditions of approval and complying with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, except to the extent that any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified Qy any of these conditions. If the development is unable to achieve or obtain desired uses, densities, or intensities, the County is not under any obligation to grant any waivers or modifications to enable the developer to achieve or obtain those desired uses, densities, or intensities. In the event of ~ conflict or inconsistency between ~ condition of approval of this land use plan and the land use plan dated "Received September 2_,_ 2014," the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency. 2. This project shall comply with, adhere~ and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made Qy the applicant.(qr authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon Qy the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon Qy the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition,~ "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board.Qy the applicant.(qr authorized agent) if i! was expressly made to the Board at ~ public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit Qy the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain ~ permit from ~ state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed Qy ~ state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in ~ violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. -27-

29 4. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant must.rumly for and obtain~ capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must rumly for and obtain ~ capacity reservation certificate prior to approval of the plat. Nothing in this condition, and nothing in the decision to approve this land use plan/preliminary subdivision plan, shall be construed as ~ guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining ~ capacity encumbrance letter or ~ capacity reservation certificate. 5. Length of stay for short term rentals shall not exceed 179 days. 6. Except as amended, modified, and L or superseded, the following BCC Conditions of Approval, dated August i. 2014, shall mm.oc a. Development shall eonform to the Orange Lake Country Club PD Land Use Plan dated "Reeeived May 2, 2014," and shall eomply with all applieable federal, state, and eounty laws, ordinanees, and regulations, exeept to the extent that any applieable eounty laws, ordinanees, or regulations are expressly v.raived or modified by any of these eonditions. Aeeordingly, the PD may be developed in aeeordanee with the uses, densities, and intensities deseribed in sueh Land Use Plan, subjeet to those uses, densities, and intensities eonforming with the restrietions and requirements found in the eonditions of approyal and eomplying with all applieable federal, state, and eounty laws, ordinanees, and regulations, exeept to the extent that any applieable eounty laws, ordinanees, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by any of these eonditions. If the development is ooable to aehieve or obtain desired uses, densities, or intensities, the County is not ooder any obligation to grant any Vt'aivers or modifieations to enable the de'veloper to aehieve or obtain those desired uses, densities, or intensities. In the event of a eonfliet or ineonsisteney between a eondition of approval of this land use plan and the land use plan dated "Reeeived May 2, 2014," the eondition of approval shall eontrol to the extent of sueh eonfliet or ineonsisteney : THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #1 b. This projeet shall eomply with. adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise eonfliet with any verbal or \Witten promise or representation made by the applieant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the publie hearing.vhere this development was appro red,.vhere sueh promise or representation, vihether oral or '+Vfitten, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, eould have reasonably been expeeted to haye been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or eould have reasonably indueed or otherwise influeneed the Board to approve the de relopment. For pl:h'poses of this eondition, a "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applieant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a publie hearing v.<here the development 'Nas eonsidered or appro red. 09/ : THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #2-28-

30 c. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this de'lelopmeflt permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite appro'ials or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencemeflt of developmeflt : THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #3 d. A copy of the vested rights certificate for this parcel needs to be included in application for a building permit. 09/24/2014: THE PRECEDING CONDITION HAS BEEN REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION OF APPROVAL #4 e. A Master Utility Plan (MUP) shall be submitted to Orange County Utilities at least thirty (30) days prior to submittal of the first set of construction plans within Orange County Utilities service area. The MUP must be approved prior to Construction Plan approval. f. The Developer shall obtain water, waste water, and reclaimed water service from Orange County Utilities for those portions that are within the Orange County Utilities service area. g. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (a)(3)(c) is granted to allow for a minimum expressway setback of thirty-five (35) feet, in lieu of the minimum required expressway setback of sixty (60) feet. h. A waiver from Orange County Code Section (a)(3) is granted to allow for a minimum PD perimeter setback often (10) feet in lieu of a minimum required PD perimeter setback of twenty-five (25) feet; pursuant to Orange County Code, Chapter 30, Article III, Section and Orange County Code, Chapter 38, Article VIII, Division 1, Section Except as amended, modified, and I or superseded, the following BCC Conditions of Approval, dated December 20, 2005, shall apply: a. Billboards and pole signs shall be prohibited. b. Outdoor storage and display shall be prohibited. c. This project shall comply with Lighting Ordinance d. Conservation areas determined to be Class I wetlands may only incur impacts where there is no other feasible or practical alternative or where development may be shown to represent an overriding public benefit as determined before the BCC. MOTION CARRIED. -29-

31 11. CDR DISTRICT 1 STILLWATER CROSSINGS & CENTER BRIDGE PD I PARCELS SC-11, SC-12, SC-14, SC-15, SC-16 (AKA ORCHARD HILLS) PSP Present for discussion were John Prowell, Jeremy Camp, Dallas Austin, and Joe Tramell. Pedro Medina, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. This project was continued from the September 10, 2014, DRC meeting in order for the applicant to meet with Planning Staff regarding the deletion of some alley-ways. During today's meeting, staff stated that they met with the applicant and the applicant submitted an exhibit of a revised lot plan. Staff directed the applicant to submit a revised lot plan layout showing the alleys clearly on the plan. MOTION by Joe Kunkel, seconded by Alberto Vargas TO APPROVE A NON-SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PARCELS SC-11, SC-12, SC-14, SC-15, SC-16 (AKA ORCHARD HILLS) PSP DATE STAMPED nreceived AUGUST 7, 2014", TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF 50-FOOT AND 40-FOOT WIDE LOTS AND INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF 60-FOOT WIDE AND 32-FOOT WIDE LOTS WITHIN PHASE 2 AND PHASE 3, AND TO REMOVE ALLEYS FOR BLOCKS THAT CONTAIN ONLY 50-FOOT AND 60- FOOT WIDE LOTS, subject to submittal of a revised lot plan chart showing the alleys. MOTION CARRIED. 12. CDR DISTRICT 1 WEST LAKE HANCOCK ESTATES PD I WEST LAKE HANCOCK ESTATES PSP Present for discussion were Nicole Stalder, Chris Tyree, and Justin Campbell. Pedro Medina, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. A change determination was requested to modify the lot configuration within Phase 4 to accommodate the current product of the builder. The basic layout remains the same but all the lot lines shifted slightly. The recreational area, open space, and tract tables reflect the minor changes that occur based on this recon:figuration, The PSP boundary and lot count have not changed. MOTION by Joe Kunkel, seconded by Lindy Wolfe TO APPROVE A NON-SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WEST LAKE HANCOCK ESTATES PSP DATE STAMPED nreceived AUGUST 27, 2014", TO MODIFY THE LOT CONFIGURATION WITHIN PHASE 4. MOTION CARRIED. -30-

32 13. CDR DISTRICT 4 MOSS PARK PD I PARCEL E PHASE 3 PSP Present for discussion were Chuck Costar, Lance Bennett, Candice Hawks, and Bennett Ruedas. David Pearce, the Project Manager presented this case to DRC. A change determination was requested to remove BCC Condition of Approval #7 which states that, "A Municipal Service Benefit Unit (MSB U) shall be established for the standard operation and maintenance of street lighting inventory including leasing, fuel and energy costs for this project. Street lighting fixtures, poles, and luminaries used in this project shall be selected from the approved inventory list supplied by the Orange County Comptroller. Street lighting fixtures, poles, and luminaries used in this project shall be supplied and installed by the utility company that services the area of the project, as authorized by law or agreement, and thereafter maintains the street lighting inventory. The developer shall obtain approval of the street lighting fixtures, poles, and luminaries from the Orange County Comptroller Special Assessments Section via a "Letter of Commitment" prior to the installation of the street lighting fixtures, poles, and luminaries and prior to the plat being recorded by Orange County Comptroller Official Records Department. All installation costs and street lighting operational costs prior to the effective date of the MSBU approval by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. " Mr. Pearce explained that during review of this PSP, the standard condition of approval regarding an MSBU for street lighting was added, however, during the plat review, staff noticed that the first two phases of Moss Park had a third party agreement with OUC regarding the street lights and that there is no MSBU for street lighting. There is no street lighting MSBU for this phase to join. There is an exisiting COA #11, that states that this phase has to join the existing HOA of Phases 1 & 2. Another issue is that Phases 1 & 2 had a third party agreement from Progress Energy (now Duke Energy) to allow OUC as a third party to provide street lighting. The applicant stated that Duke Energy is now the provider for the poles and fixtures and is the service provider. The applicant is concerned that having an MSBU will create an accounting issue for the HOA. The existing shepherd hook poles are not an approved fixture on the Comptrollers inventory list. After some discussion, the applicant was directed to either set up an MSBU for the street lighting in Phase 3 which shall have a separate assessment cost or go to the BCC with modified conditions of approval. If the Comptrollers denies the fixture, the applicant will have to change the fixtures to what is approved on the standard list. Applicant opted for the MSBU. No action taken

33 14. CDR DISTRICT 1 GRAND CYPRESS RESORT PD I GRAND CYPRESS RESORT DP Present for discussion was Dave Kelly. Sean Bailey, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. A change determination was requested to construct 60 resort residential villas and 42,000 square feet of meeting center space. 1. Development shall conform to the Grand Cypress Resort Planned Development; Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approvals; Grand Cypress Resort Development Plan dated "September 4, 2014" and to the conditions of approval listed below. Development based upon this approval shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, which are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the BCC, or by action of the BCC. 2. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 3. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a capacity reservation certificate prior to issuance of the initial certificate of occupancy. Nothing in this condition and nothing in the decision to approve this development plan shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. 4. The site shall be stabilized following grubbing, clearing, earth work or mass grading to establish a dense stand of grass, or shall incorporate other approved Best Management Practices, on all disturbed areas if development does not begin within 7 days. Final stabilization shall achieve a minimum of seventy percent (70%) coverage of the disturbed land area and shall include a maintenance program to ensure minimum coverage survival and overall site stabilization until site development. Prior to clearing or grubbing, or approval of mass grading or constructions plans a letter of credit or cash escrow acceptable to the County shall be submitted to guarantee the required site stabilization and maintenance of all disturbed areas. The County Engineer shall establish the amount of the letter of credit or cash escrow. MOTION by Mitch Gordon, seconded by Alberto Vargas, TO APPROVE A NON SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED GRAND CYPRESS RESORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 4, 2014" subject to the following conditions of approval. -32-

34 5. Prior to commencement of any earth work or construction, the developer shall provide a copy of the completed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Notice of Intent (NO I) form for stormwater discharge from construction activities to the Orange County Environmental Protection Division, NPDES Administrator. The original NOI form shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection by the developer. 6. Length of stay for short term rentals shall not exceed 179 days. 7. Pole signs and billboards shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with Chapter 31.5 of the Orange County Code. 8. Outside sales, storage, and display shall be prohibited. 9. Approval of this DP shall void the previously approved DP. MOTION CARRIED. 15. CDR DISTRICT 1 WORLD GATEWAY PD I WORLD GATEWAY DP Present for discussion were Bill Beckett and Bob Paymayesh. Sean Bailey, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. A change determination was requested to construct 102 resort units in lieu of 84 residential units. This request is consistent with the World Gateway PD Land Use Plan. MOTION By Mitch Gordon, seconded by Alberto Vargas, TO APPROVE A NON SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WORLD GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED AUGUST 29, 2014" TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 102 RESORT UNITS, subject to the following conditions of approval. 1. Development shall conform to the World Gateway Planned Development; Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approvals; World Gateway Development Plan dated "August 29, 2014" and to the conditions of approval listed below. Development based upon this approval shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, which are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the BCC, or by action of the BCC

35 2. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 3. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a capacity reservation certificate prior to approval of the plat. Nothing in this condition and nothing in the decision to approve this development plan shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. 4. Prior to construction plan approval, hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to Orange County Utilities demonstrating that proposed and existing water, wastewater, and reclaimed water systems have been designed to support all development within the DP. 5. Length of stay for short term rentals shall not exceed 179 days. 6. Pole signs and billboards shall be prohibited. Ground signs per the Master Sign Plan and fascia signs shall comply with (Tourist Commercial) Chapter 31.5 ofthe Orange County Code. 7. Outside sales, storage, and display shall be prohibited. 8. Approval of this DP shall void the previously approved DP. MOTION CARRIED. 16. PSP DISTRICT 2 SHEELER A VENUE TOWNHOMES PD I SHEELER A VENUE TOWNHOMES PSP I DP Present for discussion was Dave Kelly. David Pearce, the Project Manager, presented the Summary Report to DRC. This item was continued from the August 28, 2013, DRC meeting in order for BCC approval of a required substantial change to the Sheeler Avenue Townhomes PD. The substantial change to the PD was approved at the BCC meeting of April22, MOTION by Joe Kunkel, seconded by Andres Salcedo, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SHEELER AVENUE TOWNHOMES PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISON PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED AUGUST 25, 2014", subject to the following condtions of approval. -34-

36 1. Development shall conform to the Sheeler Avenue Townhomes PD Land Use Plan; Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approvals; Sheeler A venue Townhomes Preliminary Subdivision Plan dated "Received August 25, 2014" and to the conditions of approval listed below. Development based upon this approval shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, which are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the BCC, or by action of the BCC. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between a condition of approval of this preliminary subdivision plan and the preliminary subdivision plan dated "Received August 25, 2014" the condition of approval shall control to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency. 2. This project shall comply with, adhere to, and not deviate from or otherwise conflict with any verbal or written promise or representation made by the applicant (or authorized agent) to the Board of County Commissioners at the public hearing where this development was approved, where such promise or representation, whether oral or written, was relied upon by the Board in approving the development, could have reasonably been expected to have been relied upon by the Board in approving the development, or could have reasonably induced or otherwise influenced the Board to approve the development. For purposes of this condition, a "promise" or "representation" shall be deemed to have been made to the Board by the applicant (or authorized agent) if it was expressly made to the Board at a public hearing where the development was considered or approved. 3. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 4. When the PSP is platted and if the County does not already own the right-of-way for Sheeler Road, the 33-foot wide right-of-way easement shall be dedicated to the County. 5. Roads and drainage system(s), including any retention pond(s), will be owned and maintained by Orange County with a Municipal Service Benefit Unit (MSBU) established for stormwater system functionality. Routine maintenance, including mowing, beyond that provided by the County, shall be the responsibility of the Homeowners' Association

37 6. A Municipal Service Benefit Unit (MSBU) shall be established for the standard operation and maintenance of street lighting inventory including leasing, fuel, and energy costs for this project. Street lighting fixtures, poles, and luminaries used in this project shall be selected from the approved inventory list supplied by the Orange County Comptroller. Street lighting fixtures, poles, and luminaries used in this project shall be supplied and installed by the utility company that services the area of the project, as authorized by law or agreement, and thereafter maintains the street lighting inventory. The developer shall obtain approval of the street lighting fixtures, poles, and luminaries from the Orange County Comptroller Special Assessments Department via a "Letter of Commitment" prior to the installation of the street lighting fixtures, poles, and luminaries and prior to the plat being recorded by Orange County Comptroller Official Records section. All installation costs and street lighting operational costs prior to the effective date of the MSBU approval by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. 7. The stormwater management system shall be designed to retain the 100-year/24-hour storm event onsite, unless documentation with supporting calculations is submitted which demonstrates that a positive outfall is available. If the applicant can show the existence of a positive outfall for the subject basin, then in lieu of designing for the 1 00-year/24-hour storm event, the developer shall comply with all applicable state and local stormwater requirements and regulations. An emergency high water relief outfall shall be provided to assure overflow does not cause flooding of surrounding areas. 8. The developer shall construct a left turn lane on Sheeler Road at the entrance into the project and reflect such left turn lane on the construction plans. 9. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall provide a letter, or other communication, of no objection, from the gas company. 10. Prior to construction plan approval, documentation shall be provided that Pond 3 of this project has the legal right to drain to the existing pond to the south. 11. At the time of platting, documentation shall be provided from Orange County Public Schools that this project is in compliance with the Capacity Enhancement Agreement. Unless the property is vested and/or exempt, the applicant shall be subject to school concurrency and required to go through the review process prior to platting. 12. The applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a capacity reservation certificate prior to platting. Nothing in this condition, and nothing in the decision to approve this preliminary subdivision plan, shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. 13. Prior to mass grading, clearing, grubbing or construction, the applicant is hereby noticed that this site must comply with habitat protection regulations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). -36-

38 14. The site shall be stabilized following grubbing, clearing, earth work, or mass grading to establish a dense stand of grass, or shall incorporate other approved Best Management Practices, on all disturbed areas if development does not begin within 7 days. Final stabilization shall achieve a minimum of seventy percent (70%) coverage of the disturbed land area and shall include a maintenance program to ensure minimum coverage survival and overall site stabilization until site development. Prior to clearing or grubbing, or approval of mass grading or constructions plans, a letter of credit or cash escrow acceptable to the County shall be submitted to guarantee the required site stabilization and maintenance of all disturbed areas. The County Engineer shall establish the amount of the letter of credit or cash escrow. 15. Prior to commencement of any earthwork or construction, the developer shall provide a copy of the completed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Notice of Intent (NO I) form for stormwater discharge from construction activities to the Orange County Environmental Protection Division, NPDES Administrator. The original NOI form shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection by the developer. MOTION CARRIED. NEW PROJECTS 1. DP DISTRICT 1 STILLWATER CROSSINGS & CENTER BRIDGE PD I VINEYARDS TOWNHOMES PSP I THE VINEYARDS MASS GRADING DP Present for discussion were Garth Ritter and Matt Boerger. Sean Bailey, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. This development plan is proposing a mass grading and stormwater management plan on a total of acres. MOTION by Mitch Gordon, seconded by Joe Kunkel, TO APPROVE THE VINEYARDS MASS GRADING DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED AUGUST 25, 2014," subject to the following condtions of approval and to placing this item on today's Consent Agenda for final approval. 1. Development shall conform to the Stillwater Crossings & Center Bridge Planned Development; Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approvals; Vineyards Townhomes Preliminary Subdivision Plan; BCC approvals; The Vineyards Mass Grading Development Plan dated "August " and to the conditions of approval listed below. Development based upon this approval shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, which are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the BCC, or by action of the BCC. -37-

39 2. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 3. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a capacity reservation certificate prior to issuance of the initial certificate of occupancy. Nothing in this condition and nothing in the decision to approve this development plan shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. 4. Prior to mass grading and construction plan approval, documentation with supporting calculations shall be submitted which certifies that the existing offsite stormwater system (receiving ponds and drainage system) has the capacity to accept the stormwater flows from this project. 5. Prior to mass grading and construction plan approval, documentation shall be provided that this project has the legal right to discharge into the offsite retention ponds. 6. The site shall be stabilized following grubbing, clearing, earth work or mass grading to establish a dense stand of grass, or shall incorporate other approved Best Management Practices, on all disturbed areas if development does not begin within 7 days. Final stabilization shall achieve a minimum of seventy percent (70%) coverage of the disturbed land area and shall include a maintenance program to ensure minimum coverage survival and overall site stabilization until site development. Prior to clearing or grubbing, or approval of mass grading or constructions plans a letter of credit or cash escrow acceptable to the County shall be submitted to guarantee the required site stabilization and maintenance of all disturbed areas. The County Engineer shall establish the amount of the letter of credit or cash escrow. 7. Prior to mass grading, clearing, grubbing or construction, the applicant is hereby noticed that this site must comply with habitat protection regulations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). 8. Unless a Conservation Area Impact (CAl) permit is approved by Orange County consistent with Orange County Code Chapter 15, Article X, "Wetland Conservation Areas", prior to Construction Plan approval, no conservation area or buffer encroachments shall be permitted. Approval of this plan does not authorize any direct or indirect conservation area impacts

40 9. Prior to commencement of any earth work or construction, the developer shall provide a copy of the completed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Notice of Intent (NOI) form for stormwater discharge from construction activities to the Orange County Environmental Protection Division, NPDES Administrator. The original NOI form shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection by the developer. MOTION CARRIED. 2. DP DISTRICT 1 TINWOOD PD I REGENCY VILLAGE I HOME 2 SUITES DP Present for discussion was Jay Jackson. Tarnmi Chami, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. This request is to construct a 146 unit hotel with a height of fifty-six (56) feet and four (4) stories on a total of acres. MOTION by Mitch Gordon, seconded by Andres Salcedo, TO APPROVE THE HOME 2 SUITES DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 11, 2014," subject to the following conditions of approval, and to placing this item on today's Consent Agenda for final approval. 1. Development shall conform to the Tinwood Planned Development; Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approvals; Regency Village Phase 2 Preliminary Subdivision Plan; BCC approvals; Home 2 Suites Development Plan dated "Received September 11, 2014" and to the conditions of approval listed below. Development based upon this approval shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, which are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the BCC, or by action of the BCC. 2. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 3. Prior to construction plan approval, documentation with supporting calculations shall be submitted which certifies that the existing drainage system and pond have the capacity to accommodate this development and that this project is consistent with the approved master storm water plan for this PD. -39-

41 4. Prior to construction plan approval, documentation must be provided certifying that this project has the legal right to tie into the master drainage system. 5. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a capacity reservation certificate prior to issuance of the initial certificate of occupancy. Nothing in this condition and nothing in the decision to approve this development plan shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. 6. Prior to commencement of any earth work or construction, the developer shall provide a copy of the completed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Notice of Intent (NOI) form for stormwater discharge from construction activities to the Orange County Environmental Protection Division, NPDES Administrator. The original NOI form shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection by the developer. 7. Prior to construction plan approval, hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to Orange County Utilities demonstrating that proposed and existing water, wastewater, and reclaimed systems have been designed to support all development within the PD. 8. Outside sales, storage, and display shall be prohibited. 9. Approval of this DP shall constitute a lot split approval. 10. Billboards and pole signs shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with the Master Sign Plan. 11. Length of stay for short term rentals shall not exceed 179 days. MOTION CARRIED. 3. DP DISTRICT 4 GINN PROPERTY PD I PARCEL 2 PSP I PHASE 1 PARK SITE DP Present for discussion was John Florio. Sean Bailey, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. This development plan proposes two park tracts in Phase 1 of the PSP, Tract H (active) and Tract G (passive) on a total of acres. -40-

42 MOTION by Mitch Gordon, seconded by Alberto Vargas, TO APPROVE THE PHASE 1 PARK SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED AUGUST 21, 2014," subject to the following conditions of approval, and to placing this item on today 's Consent Agenda for final approval. 1. Development shall conform to the Ginn Property Planned Development; Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approvals; Parcel 2 Preliminary Subdivision Plan; BCC approvals; Phase 1 Park Site Development Plan dated "August 21, 2014" and to the conditions of approval listed below. Development based upon this approval shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, which are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the BCC, or by action of the BCC. 2. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 3. Prior to or concurrently with the County's approval of the plat, documentation shall be provided from Orange County Public Schools that this project is in compliance with the Capacity Enhancement Agreement. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant shall be subject to school concurrency and required to go through the review process prior to platting. 4. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a capacity reservation certificate prior to issuance of the initial certificate of occupancy. Nothing in this condition and nothing in the decision to approve this development plan shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. 5. Prior to commencement of any earthwork or construction, the developer shall provide a copy of the completed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Notice of Intent (NOI) form for stormwater discharge from construction activities to the Orange County Environmental Protection Division, NPDES Administrator. The original NOI form shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection by the developer. MOTION CARRIED

43 4. DP DISTRICT 4 PROJECT ABC PD I TRACT 8 - LOT 3C NORTHWEST QUADRANT I PROMENADE GRANDELAKESAPARTMENTSDP Present for discussion was Sam Sebaali. Tammi Chami, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. This request is to construct a 240-unit apartment complex with a height of fifty-seven feet and four stories on a total of9.57 acres. MOTION by Andres Salcedo, seconded by Joe Kunkel, TO APPROVE THE PROMENADE GRANDE LAKES APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED AUGUST 21, 2014," subject to the following conditions of approval and subject to placing this item on today 's Consent Agenda for final approval. 1. Development shall conform to the Project ABC Planned Development; Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approvals; Promenade Grande Lakes Development Plan dated "Received August 21, 2014"; and to the conditions of approval listed below. Development based upon this approval shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, which are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the BCC, or by action of the BCC. 2. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 3. Prior to commencement of any earthwork or construction, the developer shall provide a copy of the completed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Notice of Intent (NOI) form for stormwater discharge from construction activities to the Orange County Environmental Protection Division, NPDES Administrator. The original NOI form shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection by the developer. 4. Pole signs and billboards shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with Chapter 31.5 of the Orange County Code. 5. Short term I transient rental is prohibited. Length of stay shall be for 180 days or greater. 6. Prior to construction plan approval, documentation must be provided certifying that this project has the legal right to tie into the master drainage system. -42-

44 7. Prior to construction plan approval, documentation with supporting calculations shall be submitted which certifies that this project is consistent with an approved master stormwater plan for this PD. 8. Prior to the County's issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction, documentation shall be provided from Orange County Public Schools that this project is in compliance with the Capacity Enhancement Agreement. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant shall be subject to school concurrency and required to go through the review process. 9. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a capacity reservation certificate prior to approval of the plat. Nothing in this condition and nothing in the decision to approve this development plan shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. 1 O.Construction plans shall be consistent with an approved and up-to-date Master Utility Plan (MUP). MUP updates shall be submitted to Orange County Utilities at least thirty (30) days prior to the corresponding construction plan submittal. The updated MUP must be approved prior to construction plan approval. MOTION CARRIED. 5. DP DISTRICT 4 ORANGEWOOD PD- (NEIGHBORHOOD 9) I SOUTHCENTER- PARCEL 4A I 0 AUTO ORLANDODP Present for discussion was Rick Ortiz. Sean Bailey, the Project Manager, presented the TRG Summary Report to DRC. This development plan is proposing to construct a 39,154 square foot automobile dealership and car wash on a total of acres. MOTION by Mitch Gordon, seconded by Alberto Vargas, TO APPROVE THE Q AUTO ORLANDO DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE STAMPED "RECEIVED AUGUST 26, 2014," subject to the following conditions of approval and subject to placing this item on today's Consent Agenda for final approval. -43-

45 1. Development shall conform to the Orangewood - Neighborhood 9 Planned Development; Orange County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approvals; Southcenter - Parcel 4 Preliminary Subdivision Plan; BCC approvals; Q Auto Orlando Development Plan dated "August 26, 2014," and to the conditions of approval listed below. Development based upon this approval shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and county laws, ordinances, and regulations, which are incorporated herein by reference, except to the extent any applicable county laws, ordinances, or regulations are expressly waived or modified by these conditions, or by action approved by the BCC, or by action of the BCC. 2. Pursuant to Section , Florida Statutes, issuance of this development permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. Pursuant to Section , the applicant shall obtain all other applicable state or federal permits before commencement of development. 3. Prior to construction plan approval, documentation with supporting calculations shall be submitted which certifies that this project is consistent with an approved master stormwater plan for this PD. 4. Prior to construction plan approval, documentation must be provided certifying that this project has the legal right to tie into the master drainage system. 5. Unless the property is otherwise vested or exempt, the applicant must apply for and obtain a capacity encumbrance letter prior to construction plan submittal and must apply for and obtain a capacity reservation certificate prior to issuance of the initial certificate of occupancy. Nothing in this condition and nothing in the decision to approve this development plan shall be construed as a guarantee that the applicant will be able to satisfy the requirements for obtaining a capacity encumbrance letter or a capacity reservation certificate. 6. A copy of the vested rights certificate shall be required with each application for a building permit. 7. Prior to commencement of any earth work or construction, the developer shall provide a copy of the completed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Notice of Intent (NOI) form for stormwater discharge from construction activities to the Orange County Environmental Protection Division, NPDES Administrator. The original NOI form shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection by the developer. 8. Prior to construction plan approval, hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to Orange County Utilities demonstrating that proposed and existing water and wastewater systems have been designed to support all development. 9. Pole signs and billboards shall be prohibited. Ground and fascia signs shall comply with Chapter 31.5 of the Orange County Code. MOTION CARRIED. -44-

46 CONSENT AGENDA- DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVALS STILLWATER CROSSINGS & CENTER BRIDGE PD I VINEYARDS TOWNHOMES PSP I THE VINEYARDS MASS GRADING DP Plan Date Stamped "Received August 25, 2014" DISTRICT 1 TINWOOD PD I REGENCY VILLAGE PSP I HOME 2 SUITES DP Plan Date Stamped "Received September 11, 2014" DISTRICT 1 GINN PROPERTY PD I PARCEL 2 PSP I PHASE 1 PARK SITE DP Plan Date Stamped "Received August 21, 20 14" DISTRICT 4 PROJECT ABC PD I TRACT 8- LOT 3C NORTHWEST QUADRANT I PROMENADE GRANDE LAKESAPARTMENTSDP Plan Date Stamped "Received August 21, 20 14" DISTRICT4 ORANGEWOOD PD - (NEIGHBORHOOD 9) I SOUTH CENTER - PARCEL 4A I 0 AUTO ORLANDOFP Plan Date Stamped "Received August 26, 20 14" DISTRICT4 MOTION by Joe Kunkel, seconded by Andres Salcedo TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS AND RECOGNIZE THAT THE 15-DAY APPEAL PERIOD FOR THESE APPROVALS SHALL BEGIN. MOTION CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, Lise e. Egipciaco De e ment Coordinator Planning Division -45-

47 AFFIDAVIT OF LISETTE M. EGIPCIACO STATE OF FLORIDA SS: COUNTY OF ORANGE I, Lisette M. Egipciaco, hereby state on personal knowledge, as follows : 1. I am the Development Coordinator for the Development Review Committee under Chairman, John Smogor. 2. My duties as Development Coordinator include scheduling Development Review Committee meetings for new developments within Orange County, preparing staff reports for said meetings, preparing and submitting minutes for the Development Review Committee members, requesting public hearings for development projects and appeals, and preparing posters, letters or any other information necessary to inform the public of proposed developments. 3. In the course of my duties as Development Coordinator, I record the approval of the Development Review Committee meeting minutes by its members at which time a copy is distributed to each developer, consultant or other interested parties. I attest that the attached minutes are true and are an accurate reflection ofthe minutes of September 24, 2014, to the best of my knowledge. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE ~gipciaco The foregoing Affidavit was acknowledged before me this day of October 8, 2014, by Lisette M. Egipciaco, who is personally known to me, and did not take an oath. ~ IJI.Y p" ~"..~0 lerrh. YN PONTIUs *.~ * MY COMMISSION I EE ~.,. EXPIRES: March 6, 2016 'P ~,.rjto' Bonded Thru lkldget Holwy S«vices