PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA February 26, :00pm

Transcription

1 1) Call to Order a) Approval of Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION MING AGNDA February 26, :00pm b) Oath of Office and Swear in Planning Commission Members: i) Gary Pettis ii) Peter Vickery iii) Paul Stone (Alternate 1) iv) Robert Rabin (Alternate 2) c) Approval of Minutes November 27, 2017 d) lect Chair and Vice Chair for ) Public Hearings a) CONDIIONAL US PRMI (CUP) AMNDMN: Application from Buell Consulting, Inc. c/o Verizon Wireless on behalf of the property owner Steel Peak, LLC for an amendment to an existing CUP to allow for the addition of new antennas on the existing monopole and new ground equipment on a platform near the existing monopole on the property located at 4700 Merrywood Lane; R-1 Low Density Single-Family Residence Zoning District; PID# b) VARIANC: Application from ric & lisa ngesser for a 23 foot variance from the required 50 foot wetland setback to allow for an addition to the existing home to be located 27 feet from the delineated edge of the wetland on the property located at 1135 Marina Drive; R-1 Low Density Single-Family Residence Zoning District; PID# ) Informational Items a) Staff Reports b) Council Reports 4) Adjournment - he agenda packet with all background material is located at the back table for viewing by the public. - Published agenda subject to change without notice. - Information and materials relating to the above items are available for review at city hall by appointment. he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character.

2 PLANNING COMMISSION MING MINUS November 27, :00pm 1) Call to Order Chair Sandholm opened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. In attendance: Commissioners: Chair Lora Sandholm, Peter Vickery, Gary Pettis, Damian Young, Justin Forbrook, Steve Livermore and John schumperlin; Council Liaison: Mayor Lisa Whalen; Staff: Community Development Director David Abel, City Planner Nickolas Olson and City Clerk Kris Linquist. Absent: None a) Approval of Agenda Motion by schumperlin and seconded by Young to approve the agenda as presented. Motion passed 7-0. Absent: None b) Approval of Minutes October 23, 2017 Motion by Pettis and seconded by schumperlin to approve the minutes from October 23, 2017 as presented. Motion passed 7-0. Absent: None 2) Public Hearings a) PLANND UNI DVLOPMN (PUD) PRLIMINARY PLA: Application from Homestead Partners (HP Holdings, LLC) to develop 31 single family lots on the properties located at 9200 owns dge Road, PID# and 36 Address Unassigned, PID# Olson presented the staff report as found in the Planning Commission packet dated November, Highlights included: he City of Minnetrista originally approved the Master Plan and Final Plat for the 1 st phase of Hunters Crest in here have been 5 additional phases (6 total) and one amendment to the Master Development Agreement (in 2005 prior to the 5 th phase) he properties included in the proposed Preliminary Plat have long been considered as possible future development areas of the Hunters Crest neighborhood. he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 27, 2017 Page 1 of 9

3 he Applicant has entered into a purchase agreement with all owners of the Properties in the proposed Preliminary Plat. he preliminary plat is consistent with the previous 6 phases of Hunters Crest he Parks Commission is recommending the cash in lieu of land as park dedication for this development. Staff notified all residents within 500 feet. o date, staff has not received any written comments as a result of this notice. he Applicant is proposing to call the development Hunters Crest 7 th Addition. om Bakritges with Homestead Partners, Applicant overviewed his company and the intentions of the PUD proposal. He hopes to break ground in the spring of 2018 and to have a model ready for the Fall Parade Sandholm questioned who would maintain the shared driveway. Abel stated the City would not responsible and there will be an agreement between the homeowners that share that driveway. Young questioned if the HOA would merge with the existing HOA. Bakritges stated that there would be a separate HOA. Chair Sandholm opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. Bill Neumann, 4593 Hunters rail, Minnetrista He had concerns about the lot sizes and the cul-de-sac not being consistent with the current Hunters Crest development. He was concerned that the new HOA would not be a part of the existing Hunters Crest HOA. He doesn t like that there will be a shared driveway. He doesn t feel that it fits in with the Hunters Crest development. He has concerns with fire flow issues with a new development. here was some discussion on adjacent properties and granting of easements for utilities. here was more discussion on density. Jackie Waugh, 9300 ownsedge Road, Minnetrista expressed concern about the water tower. She had concerns with access points for public safety issues. She also expressed concerns with light pollution. he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 27, 2017 Page 2 of 9

4 Margaret Florek, 9200 ownsedge Road (previously), th St., Delano (currently) expressed concerns with the wetland marshy area that was caused when the Hunters Crest development originally went in. Bill Neumann, 4593 Hunters rail, Minnetrista expressed concerns with the tree removal. Chair Sandholm closed the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Forbrook questioned why the HOA was not going to be joining the existing Hunters Crest HOA. Abel stated they are not required to be together but they will still have to follow all the Hunters Crests standards. he City can only ensure they establish an HOA for stormwater pond, signage and other similar issues that an HOA covers. he city cannot require them to join the Hunters Crest HOA. Bakritges commented that the homes will range from $450,000 to $650,000. here was further discussion on the HOA. Motion made by schumperlin, seconded by Pettis to recommend the City Council approve the requested preliminary plat to develop 31 single family units at the properties of 9200 owns dge Road, PID# and 36 Address Unassigned, PID# , subject to the following conditions: 1) his preliminary plat approval shall constitute the most current approval for all the Property contained in the preliminary plat. o the extent that any of the property included in this preliminary plat has been subject to any previous preliminary plat approvals, this approval and the conditions thereto shall supersede such prior approval; 2) he plans and improvements shall follow the required setbacks as outlined in the master plan per Resolution No and later amended by Resolution No ; 3) he Applicant shall submit a set of architectural guidelines for homes to be constructed in the subdivision which is acceptable to the City prior to or at the time of application for final plat approval; 4) he Applicant shall revise the plan set to combine Outlot C with Lot 22, Block 2 and establish a shared driveway maintenance agreement for Lots 20, 21 and 22, Block 2 in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; 5) he Applicant shall comply with all comments and recommendations outlined by the city engineer in the he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 27, 2017 Page 3 of 9

5 memorandums dated November 13, 2017 & November 15, 2017 prepared by WSB & Associates. 6) he Applicant shall construct an emergency warning siren for the subdivision or pay the City the required fee of $1,984 as a contribution toward a siren to serve the area; 7) he Applicant shall pay the City a park dedication fee of $72,000 that would be dedicated in lieu of a land contribution at the time of final plat approval; 8) he Applicant shall pay the City a trunk sanitary sewer fee of $1,000/acre above the OHW at the time of final plat approval; 9) he Applicant shall pay the City a trunk municipal water fee of $8,900/acre above the OHW at the time of final plat approval; 10) he Applicant shall develop a tree replacement plan acceptable to the City prior to or at the time of application for final plat approval or make a contribution of an amount equal to $100 per caliper inch of tree removed from the Property in excess of the 30 percent allowed by ordinance to the City s ree Replacement an nvironmental nhancement Fund. As submitted, the Applicant shall contribute $14,400.00; 11) he Applicant shall comply with rules, regulations and permitting requirements of Hennepin County, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and all other governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Property; 12) All utilities installed on the Property shall be located underground; 13) Standard drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated around the perimeter of all lots and improvements within the subdivision; 14) he Applicant must execute a development agreement acceptable in form and substance to the City prior to final plat approval that includes the delivery of proper letters of credit or other financial security acceptable to the city to ensure the required improvements are constructed adequately and according to the specifications of the city; 15) he Applicant shall establish a viable homeowners association, acceptable to the city which will be responsible for the ownership and maintenance of among other things: common facilities, storm drainage ways, storm drainage ponds and any improvements which are not to be accepted by the city for public ownership and maintenance. he Applicant will submit copies of the association agreement, bylaws and articles of incorporation for incorporated associations to the city attorney for review; he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 27, 2017 Page 4 of 9

6 16) he Applicant shall be required to construct, at its expense, all improvements within the subdivision; 17) he Applicant shall submit title evidence satisfactory to the city attorney prior to final plat approval; 18) he Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse to the City for all costs of reviewing the submissions for platting the Property and the negotiation and preparation of all related agreements and documents; and 19) A completed application for approval of the final plat must be submitted to the City within 180 days of the date of adoption of this preliminary plat resolution by the City Council. he completed application must comply with all conditions and requirements of applicable regulations and all terms and conditions of this preliminary plat approval. Motion passed 7-0. Absent: None his item will be brought forward to the December 4, 2017 Council meeting. b) CLASS III SUBDIVISION PRLIMINARY & FINAL PLA WIH VARIANCS: Application from James & Lynda Kucher to replat 2 single family lots with variances from the required lot width and lot size on the properties at 3910 Farmhill Circle; A Agriculture Zoning District; PID# and 3940 Farmhill Circle; A Agriculture Zoning District; PID# Olson presented the staff report as found in the Planning Commission packet dated November, Highlights included: he Applicants want to combine the parcels into two parcels. he hree Rivers Park District (RPD) intends on purchasing both parcels and use them for the corridor for the future regional trail. he RPD intends to partner with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and to sell them Lot 2 after RPD purchases both Lots from the Kuchers. MCWD plans to construct an alum treatment facility on its portion of the property sometime in the future. he treatment facility would treat the water from Six-Mile Creek to help improve the water quality it flows into Halstead Bay. A variance would be required for both lot width and lot area. Staff notified all residents within 500 feet. o date, staff has not received any written comments as a result of this notice. here was discussion of what an alum plant is and does. he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 27, 2017 Page 5 of 9

7 Chair Sandholm opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. here was no one to speak on this matter. Chair Sandholm closed the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. here was discussion on the treatment of the water for Halsted Bay. Motion made by Vickery, seconded by Livermore to recommend the City Council approve the requested preliminary plat & Final Plat with Variance for the properties located at 3910 & 3940 Farmhill Circle, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) he Applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County and all other governmental entities and agencies having jurisdiction over Farmhill hird Addition; 2) hree copies of the final plat, mylars, a certified copy of the final plat and an electronic digital copy of the final plat must be presented to the City; 3) he plat must be recorded within 1 year of the date of the plat of Farmhill hird Addition is executed by the City; 4) he Applicant must reimburse the City for all fees and costs incurred by the City in review of the application for plat approval; and 5) he Applicant shall comply with the city attorney s recommendation regarding all title matters concerning the plat procedures for recording the plat and related documents. Motion passed 7-0. Absent: None his item will be brought to the December 4, 2017 Council meeting. 3) Business Items a) VARIANC: Application from Donald & Christina Swenson to reduce the required side yard from 15 feet to 5 feet and the required wetland setback from 50 feet to 20 feet to allow for the construction of a new single family home at 36 Address Unassigned; R-1 Low Density Single Family Residence Zoning District; PID# Olson presented the staff report as found in the Planning Commission packet dated November, Highlights included: his item was presented at the October 23, 2017 meeting where a public hearing was held for public comment. he Planning Commission tabled review of the application until this meeting. Staff made changes to the staff report to reflect any revisions and new submittals since the October 23, 2017 meeting. he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 27, 2017 Page 6 of 9

8 he Applicants purchased the property in 1993 along with the property at 4080 Lotus Drive. Lot was created in the 1960 s or 70 s with Registered Land Survey No In 2016, the Applicants applied for a wetland delineation to determine the boundary and type of all wetland on the Property. he results show that there is not a building pad within the required building setbacks. he Property gains access through an easement for road purposes over ract A of Registered Land Survey 455. his does not provide the Property with access to utilities. he Applicant have obtained an executed easement from the owner of ract A. he Property is entirely located within the shoreland wetland protection zone. he Applicant has submitted a supplemental narrative to address the issues from the October 23, 2017 meeting. he Applicant has withdrawn the request for a front yard setback variance. Finding of fact made by staff as follows: 1) he Property is currently zoned R-1 Low Density Single Family Residence and is located within the Shoreland Overlay District; 2) he proposed new home is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of City s zoning ordinance because single family homes are permitted in the R-1 Low Density Single Family Residence Zoning District; 3) he proposed new home is consistent with the goals and policies of the City s comprehensive plan which are established to maintain neighborhood character and preserve important environmental features; 4) he proposed new home represents a reasonable sized house for the Property; 5) he proposed side yard setback is consistent with the Woodland Cove development, which represents a large portion of the surrounding land uses; 6) A ype 2 wetland, which has historically existed on the Property, eliminates any building pad within the setbacks for the Property; 7) he Applicants are proposing the new home in the most reasonable location on the lot given the existing conditions; and 8) he proposed home is similar in size and architecture to neighboring homes and the current models offered in the he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 27, 2017 Page 7 of 9

9 Woodland Cove development, consistent with the character of the locality. Pettis commented that he was disappointment that the soil samples were not provided for the meeting. Olson stated that the city could not require the applicant to provide that. he potential new home builder will have to provide the soil testing before building a home on the site. Rick Brama of Keller Williams Realty, representing the applicant, overviewed an he received from the owner of ract A. He stated that the potential home pad will be moved back so it would not create a front yard setback. here was discussion about building a basement on this lot. Don Swenson, Applicant, Atrium Way, Minnetonka - commented that he has soil borings done by Jacobson ngineering. Motion made by schumperlin, seconded by Forbrook to recommend the City Council approve the requested side yard setback variance and wetland setback variance at 36 Address Unassigned (PID# ) based on the findings of fact in staff report and subject to the following conditions: 1) he Applicants shall submit a revised plan set that matches the revised survey by.g. Rud & Sons, Inc. last dated October 4, 2017 which no longer requires a front yard setback variance. he plans submitted with the application are inverse plans and shall not be used for construction; 2) If the front entry is to be covered as shown in the plan set, the Applicants shall submit a revised survey depicting the location and size of the covered front entry. he covered front must remain at least 20 feet from the delineated edge of the wetland; 3) he Applicants shall submit soils testing to show the proposed new home construction will meet the minimum requirements of the Minnesota Residential Building Code which may include an engineered house plan. he new home building permit application must be approved by the Building Official prior to issue of a building permit; 4) he executed utility easement shall be recorded with the Office of the Registrar of itles in Hennepin County, Minnesota; 5) he Applicants shall obtain the necessary permits and approvals associated with the proposed 400 square foot de minimis exception wetland impact from the City and other applicable entities with jurisdiction over the Property prior to applying for a building permit; he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 27, 2017 Page 8 of 9

10 6) he Applicants obtain all necessary permits and approvals from the City and approvals from the City and other applicable entities with jurisdiction prior to any construction; 7) All required grading shall maintain existing drainage patterns or improve the existing drainage of the lot and adjacent lots; 8) he Applicants are responsible for all fees incurred by the City in review of this application; and 9) he variance approval is valid for two years from the date of approval and will become void and expire unless a building permit has been issued for the site. Motion passed 7-0. Absent: None. his item will be brought to the December 4, 2017 Council meeting. 4) Informational Items a) Staff Reports Community Development Director Abel Notification for re-appointments for Planning Commission deadline b) Council Reports Mayor Lisa Whalen 2018 Budget December 4 th Budget Hearing City Survey 5) Adjournment Motion by Young and seconded by Forbrook to adjourn the meeting at 8:37 p.m. Motion passed 7-0. Absent: None Respectfully submitted, Kris Linquist Kris Linquist City Clerk he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 27, 2017 Page 9 of 9

11 CIY OF MINNRISA PUBLIC HARING Subject: Prepared By: CONDIIONAL US PRMI (CUP) AMNDMN: Application from Buell Consulting, Inc. c/o Verizon Wireless on behalf of the property owner Steel Peak, LLC for an amendment to an existing CUP to allow for the addition of new antennas on the existing monopole and new ground equipment on a platform near the existing monopole on the property located at 4700 Merrywood Lane; R-1 Low Density Single- Family Residence Zoning District; PID# Nickolas Olson, City Planner Meeting Date: February 26, 2018 Overview: Buell Consulting, Inc. c/o Verizon Wireless (the Applicant ) on behalf of the property owner Steel Peak, LLC is requesting an amendment to an existing conditional use permit to allow for the addition of new antennas on the existing monopole and new ground equipment on a platform near the existing monopole on the property located at 4700 Merrywood Lane (the Property ). Background: he Applicant is seeking an amendment to an existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for technological improvements and equipment upgrades on the existing monopole at 4700 Merrywood Lane. he specific upgrade activity will involve installing antennas at the 140 level and place ground equipment on a platform within a 16 x 33 lease area. Verizon s installation will look nearly identical to the three installations that are currently on site. he only changes Verizon will make to the site is installing antennas, ground equipment, and bringing in utilities (fiber optics/power) underground to serve Verizon s equipment. Verizon will utilize the existing access off of Merrywood Lane. Steel Peak, LLC (the Property Owner ) was granted permission to construct the monopole in 1999 by Res. No A condition of approval was that the Property Owner agreed to allow four users on the monopole. here are currently 3 different users of the monopole: Sprint (Res. No ), -Mobile (Res. No ), and A& (Res. No ). Verizon presents a new user of the monopole and satisfies the condition of initial approval. City Code requires an amendment if changes are desired to existing conditional use permits. Multiple amendments have been requested and approved since the approval of the original CUP related to additions and/or changes to the existing tower and associated accessory structures. Discussion: he city council may grant conditional use permits when such permits are authorized by code and may impose conditions and safeguards in such permits to protect Mission Statement: he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character.

12 the health, safety and welfare of the community and assure harmony with the comprehensive plan of the city. In acting upon an application for a conditional use permit, the city will consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the city including, but not limited to, the factors of: 1. Noise, glare, odor, electrical interference, vibration, dust, and other nuisances; Noise, glare, odor, electrical interference, vibration, dust, etc. should not change as a result of the proposed upgrades. his industry is heavily regulated by the FCC and Verizon adheres to all local, state, and federal rules and regulations. 2. Fire and safety hazards; Fire and safety hazards should not change as a result of the proposed upgrades. 3. xisting and anticipated traffic conditions; parking facilities on adjacent streets and land; here will be increased traffic during the construction phase, which is anticipated to last a week or so. hen the only increase in traffic will be one maintenance vehicle stopping by once/month for maintenance purposes. 4. he effect on surrounding properties, including valuation, aesthetics and scenic views, land uses, character and integrity of the neighborhood; he proposed upgrades do not change the use of the property as the monopole is existing nor shall they have adverse effects on the aesthetics, valuation, or character of the property or neighborhood. 5. Consistency with the city s comprehensive plan; impact on governmental facilities and services, including roads, sanitary sewer, water, police, and fire; he Comprehensive Plan calls for meeting the City s infrastructure needs and providing adequate utilities for the surrounding community would achieve that goal. Verizon will work directly with the private utility providers to bring in adequate electricity and fiber optics to the site, which are private utilities. 6. ffect on sensitive environmental features including lakes, surface and underground water supply and quality, wetlands, slopes, flood plains and soils; here are no lakes, wetlands, or other sensitive features listed above on the Property. he antennas are being added to the existing monopole and the ground equipment will be on a platform (concrete slab) within the 16 x 33 lease area. he installation of the ground equipment will result in removal of 2 deciduous trees. he proposed tree removal meets the City s tree preservation ordinances. 7. Other factors as found relevant by the city. here are no additional factors to consider regarding the proposed amendment. he city may also consider whether the proposed use complies or is likely to comply in the future with all standards and requirements set out in other regulations or ordinances of the city or other governmental bodies having jurisdiction over the city. In permitting a new Mission Statement: he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character.

13 conditional use or the alteration of an existing conditional use, the city may impose, in addition to the standards and requirements expressly specified by ordinance, additional conditions which it considers necessary to protect the best interest of the surrounding area or the community as a whole. Neighborhood Comments: Staff sent notices to all residents within 500 feet of the subject property. o date, staff has not heard from or received any written comments from neighbors with regards to the requested amendment. Conclusion: he Planning Commission should review the requested amendment against the factors outlined in the staff report and hold a public hearing. After closing the public hearing and reviewing the record before them, the Planning Commission should establish findings of fact as to why the request should be approved or denied. Findings of fact for approval are as follows: 1. he Applicant has appropriately applied for an amendment to the conditional use permit as required by city code and previous approvals; 2. he original approval allowed for up to four different users of the monopole. Verizon Wireless represents the fourth different user of the monopole; 3. Allowing for an additional user of the monopole will help the City meet its infrastructure needs, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; 4. he proposed upgrades are consistent with the current and future use of the Property; and 5. he proposed upgrades do not pose any discernable fire or safety hazards, nuisances, negative impacts on environmental features, or require additional governmental services. Recommended Action: Motion to recommend the City Council approve the conditional use permit amendment to allow for the addition of new antennas on the existing monopole and new ground equipment on the property located at 4700 Merrywood Lane based on the findings of fact in staff report and subject to the following conditions: 1. he new antennas and ground equipment shall be constructed in accordance with the approved building plans; 2. Changes or expansion of infrastructure on the site will require an additional amendment of the CUP. Minor changes in the number or configuration of antennae mounted on the monopole may be administratively approved by the City Planner, Zoning Administrator, or other duly authorized staff responsible for zoning administration and enforcement; 3. he Applicant must obtain all necessary permits and approvals from other applicable entities with jurisdiction over the Property prior to construction; and 4. he Applicant is responsible for all fees incurred by the City in review of this application. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Proposed Plans Mission Statement: he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character.

14 4700 Merrywood Lane 1 inch = 188 feet February 8, 2018 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates

15 Written Statement: a. A listing of contact information including name(s), address(es) and phone number(s) of: the owner of record, authorized agents or representatives, engineer, surveyor, and any other relevant associates; Owner = Steel Peak, LLC; Scott Strand; rlipauls@earthlink.net; ; Authorized rep: Rob Viera, Buell Consulting, ; robertjviera@yahoo.com ngineer/architect: Design 1 Brian Schriener bschriener@design1ep.com; b. A listing of the following site data: Address, current zoning, parcel size in acres and square feet, property identification number(s) (PID), and current legal description(s); Address: 4700 Merrywood Lane PID: Zoning: R-1 Size:.33 acres (14,522 SF) Legal: Lot 1 Block 6 Palmer Pointe Addition c. A narrative regarding the history of the property (current and past uses) and any preapplication discussions with staff. Property has been used for wireless telecommunications for quite some time. Currently, all three major wireless carriers (Sprint, A&, and -Mobile) in this market are utilizing this tower. Verizon Wireless is also desirous to improve coverage to this area of Minnetrista. d. A specific written description of the proposed use(s). Incorporate information describing how the use will work on the proposed site including proposed site changes, existing open spaces, landscaping, traffic circulation, transition areas to adjacent properties, individual uses for existing and proposed structures, and effects on natural areas (wetlands, forests, etc.) both on-site and in the general vicinity of the project. Verizon Wireless is proposing to install antennas at the 140 level and place their ground equipment on a platform within a 16 x 33 lease area. Verizon s installation will look nearly identical to the three installations that are currently on site. he only changes Verizon will make to the site is installing antennas, ground equipment, and bringing in utilities (fiber optics/power) underground to serve Verizon s equipment. Verizon will utilize the existing access off of Merrywood Lane. A service technician will visit the site every 4-6 to ensure peak optimization and adherence to all rules/regulations.

16 e. Address how the proposed use would affect the health, safety, and general welfare of the city including but not limited to the factors listed below. his installation will have no adverse effects on the health, safety, or welfare of the city. his industry is heavily regulated by the FCC and Verizon adheres to all local, state, and federal rules and regulations. he only impact this project will have on the surrounding area is increased speed and capacity for Verizon Wireless customers. For all potential adverse effects, please address how the conflict(s) and/or disturbance(s) would be avoided or mitigated: -Noise, glare, odor, electrical interference, vibration, dust, etc. he addition of Verizon s equipment to this existing tower site will not cause noise, glare, odor, interference, vibration, or dust. -Possible fire and safety hazards: Verizon will adhere to all city regulations and the site will be inspected subsequent to construction completion. -xisting and anticipated traffic conditions: here ll be increased traffic during the construction phase (week or so), but then the only increase in traffic will be one maintenance vehicle stopping by once/month for maintenance purposes. -Parking facilities on adjacent streets and land: here s ample space near the tower for a few maintenance vehicles as well as street parking that s available. -he effect on surrounding properties including valuation, aesthetics, scenic views, current and possible land uses, character, and integrity of the neighborhood: Verizon s adding antennas between 2 other sets of antennas and adding an equipment platform in the back of the property well screened from view. here ll be no adverse effect on aesthetics, valuation, or character. -Impact on governmental facilities and services including roads, parks, schools, sanitary sewer system, water facilities & supply, and police & fire protection: NA. Verizon will work directly with utility providers to bring in adequate electricity and fiber optics to the site. -ffect on sensitive environmental features including lakes, surface and underground water supply, wetlands, slopes, flood plains, and soils: NA as the tower s already installed and being utilized by others. here are no wetlands on the subject property.

17 f Describe how the proposed use meets the objectives outlined within the Minnetrista Comprehensive Plan: g. Provide a narrative addressing concerns/issues raised by neighboring properties (staff always suggests discussing your proposal with the neighboring land owners to get a sense of what issues may arise as your application is processed): Not applicable. h. Describe how conflicts with nearby land uses (livability, value, potential future development, etc.) and/or disturbances to wetlands or natural areas are being avoided or mitigated: Not applicable as we are simply adding equipment to a tower that already exists. i.provide justification that the proposal will not place an excessive burden on roads (traffic), sewage, water supply, parks, schools, fire, police, or other public facilities/services (including traffic flows) in the area: Verizon will not utilize any of these utilities or services (other than the occasional technician visiting the site). j. Outline a proposed development/operating schedule (when will the use begin, hours of operation, etc). If new construction is proposed, provide a development schedule indicating the approximate date when construction of the project or stages of the same can be expected to begin and be completed: Verizon is proposing to build this site at some point in Once construction begins, it ll take about 2 weeks to complete.

18 DPARMNAL APPROVALS OWR LVAION JOB IL NAM DA RF NGINR NIHYA JAIPURIYAR 9/8/2017 OPRAIONS MANAGR JONAHAN FOWLR CONSRUCION NGINR ALX HOLZINGR 9/5/2017 MIN GAUSS NW BUILD LSSOR / LICNSOR APPROVAL SIGNAUR PRIND NAM DA I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ROBR J. DAVIS, Reg. No PROJC INFORMAION VICINIY MAP LSSOR / LICNSOR: PLAS CHCK H APPROPRIA BOX BLOW SI NAM: SI ADDRSS: COUNY: LAIUD: LONGIUD: DRAWING BASD ON SI DAA FORM DAD: MIN GAUSS MRRYWOOD LAN MINNRISA, MN HNNPIN N 44 53' 30.31" (NAD83) W 93 40' 00.88" (NAD83) MRRYWOOD LAN SI CHARLSON MADOWS 7 LAK ZUMBRA CASAMIA ROAD 7 NO CHANGS. CHANGS NDD. S COMMNS. LSSOR / LICNSOR: CONACS SL PAK LLC. 109 WS COLORADO AVNU, LLURID, CO SCO SRAND (970) Signed: Date: DSIGN 9973 VALLY VIW RD. DN PRAIRI, MN (952) BUILDING YP: SI ARA: IIB 18' X 33' = 594 S.F. ZUMBRA DRIV LSS: VRIZON WIRLSS BUSH LAK ROAD BLOOMINGON, MN RON RIR (612) HOS SRUCUR BUILD DA: 2001 NORH POWR UILIY COMPANY CONAC: XCL NRGY 1518 CHSNU AV. MINNAPOLIS, MN PHILLIP GLORVIGN (952) BUSH LAK ROAD BLOOMINGON, MN (612) SH SH DSCRIPION SH INDX -1 PROJC INFORMAION, OWR LVAION, & SH INDX A-1 SI PLAN & DAIL INDX A-2 NLARGD SI PLAN A-2.1 CONDUI DAILS A PLAFORM AND OWR & PHOOS A-3 ANNNA AND COAX KY, CABL BRIDG PLAN, NOS & PHOOS A-4 OULIN SPCIFICAIONS LOCAION SCAN LCO UILIY COMPANY CONAC: ARCHIC: SURVYOR: SRUCURAL NGINR:.B.D. DSIGN 1 ARCHICS LLC 9973 VALLY VIW ROAD DN PRAIRI, MN (952) WIDSH SMIH NOLING 610 FILLMOR SR - PO BOX 1028 ALXANDRIA, MN HRSMANN NGINRING INC WS 31S SR YANKON, SD RIC HIN (605) PROJC LOC. COD: MIN GAUSS MRRYWOOD LAN MINNRISA, MN G-1 GROUNDING NOS G-2 GROUNDING PLAN & GROUNDING DAIL INDX U-1 SI UILIY PLANS & NOS - SURVY ISSU SUMMARY RV DSCRIPION SH/DAIL A ISSUD FOR RVIW ALL B ISSUD FOR OWNR SIGNOFF ALL 0 ISSUD FOR BID/CONSRUCION XX-XX-XX ALL GOCHNICAL NGINR:.B.D SH CONNS: CONACS ISSU SUMMARY SH INDX DPARMNAL APPROVALS LSSOR APPROVAL PROJC INFORMAION ARA & VICINIY MAPS GNRAL NOS DRAWN BY: DA: CHCKD BY: WC APS RV. A RV. B LVAION SCAL: 1" = 40' -1

19 W W GNRAOR YP: DISL DAIL INDX 987 FROS DPH DSIGN = 4'-0" DAIL PLAFORM DAIL DSCRIPION VZW9.4X14-GLSP-4: 9'-4"x14'-0" PLAFORM W/ FULL CANOPY 989 GN ROZK: DISL GNRAOR W/ IC SHILD BOLLARD DAIL (NO USD) FNC SCION # CABL BRIDG SCION (S ALSO A-2.1) CABL BRIDG LVAION (NO USD) ROAD SCION (NO USD) GA DAIL (SIMILAR) GPS MOUNING DAIL (NO USD) LCO NRY DAIL I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ROBR J. DAVIS, Reg. No CMPH DAIL ON-LIN RISR DIAGRAM ( G.C. O VRIFY) H H 12.1 MR DAIL # I.L.C./DIS. BOX IC SHILD Signed: Date: W 984 DSIGN 9973 VALLY VIW RD. DN PRAIRI, MN (952) H H BUSH LAK ROAD BLOOMINGON, MN (612) S 995 W PROJC LOC. COD: MIN GAUSS MRRYWOOD LAN MRRYWOOD LAN MINNRISA, MN SH CONNS: SI PLAN DAIL INDX S S S SI PLAN 987 SA RUNK HIGHWAY NO. 7 SCAL: 1" = 30' NORH DRAWN BY: DA: CHCKD BY: WC APS RV. A RV. B A-1

20 W 996 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ROBR J. DAVIS, Reg. No Signed: Date: H 984 H DSIGN VALLY VIW RD. DN PRAIRI, MN (952) BUSH LAK ROAD BLOOMINGON, MN (612) PROJC LOC. COD: MIN GAUSS 995 MRRYWOOD LAN MINNRISA, MN W SH CONNS: NLARGD SI PLAN DRAWN BY: DA: CHCKD BY: WC APS RV. A RV. B NORH 1 NLARGD SI PLAN SCAL: 1"=10' A-2

21 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ROBR J. DAVIS, Reg. No Signed: Date: DSIGN 9973 VALLY VIW RD. DN PRAIRI, MN (952) CONDUI A PLAFORM SCAL: 1/4"=1'-0" 2 CONDUI A OWR SCAL: 1/4"=1'-0" BUSH LAK ROAD BLOOMINGON, MN (612) PROJC LOC. COD: MIN GAUSS MRRYWOOD LAN MINNRISA, MN SH CONNS: NLARGD SI PLAN CONDUI DALS PHOOSNLARGD SI PLAN 3 PHOO VIW: LOOKING SOUHWS 6 PHOO VIW: LOOKING SOUHWS DRAWN BY: DA: CHCKD BY: WC APS RV. A RV. B NORH 4 PHOO VIW: LOOKING SOUHAS 5 PHOO FACING UP SCAL: NON A-2.1

22 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ROBR J. DAVIS, Reg. No Signed: Date: DSIGN VALLY VIW RD. DN PRAIRI, MN (952) PHOO FACING WS VIW: LOOKING SOUHWS QUIPMN KY BUSH LAK ROAD BLOOMINGON, MN (612) PROJC LOC. COD: ANNNA KY MIN GAUSS MRRYWOOD LAN MINNRISA, MN SH CONNS: COAX & ANNNA KY CABL BRIDG PLAN ANNNA MOUNING DAIL PHOOS NORH DRAWN BY: DA: CHCKD BY: RV. A RV. B NORH 6 PHOO FACING SOUH VIW: LOOKING SOUHWS 2 CABL SHILD/CONDUI PLAN SCAL: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 ANNNA MOUNING DAIL SCAL: 3/16" = 1'-0" A-3 WC APS

23 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ROBR J. DAVIS, Reg. No Signed: Date: DSIGN 9973 VALLY VIW RD. DN PRAIRI, MN (952) BUSH LAK ROAD BLOOMINGON, MN (612) PROJC LOC. COD: MIN GAUSS MRRYWOOD LAN MINNRISA, MN SH CONNS: OULIN SPCIFICAIONS DRAWN BY: DA: CHCKD BY: WC APS RV. A RV. B A-4

24 GNRAL GROUNDING NOS: SYMBOL AND NO LGND I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ROBR J. DAVIS, Reg. No Signed: Date: DSIGN 9973 VALLY VIW RD. DN PRAIRI, MN (952) BUSH LAK ROAD BLOOMINGON, MN (612) PROJC LOC. COD: MIN GAUSS 2 COMPRSSION CONNCOR DAILS SCAL: NS MRRYWOOD LAN MINNRISA, MN SH CONNS: GROUNDING NOS DRAWN BY: DA: CHCKD BY: WC APS RV. A RV. B XOHRMIC WLD DAILS SCAL: NS G-1

25 GROUNDING DAIL INDX DAIL PLAFORM DAIL DSCRIPION 9'-4" X 14'-0" PLAFORM W/ CANOPY GROUNDING LVAIONS 11.1 S WLL DAIL, GROUND RING & ROD DAIL 11.3 RBAR GROUNDING DAIL CONDUI DAIL YPICAL GROUNDING CABL BRIDG DAIL YPICAL OWR GROUNDING DAIL I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ROBR J. DAVIS, Reg. No Signed: Date: DSIGN 9973 VALLY VIW RD. DN PRAIRI, MN (952) BUSH LAK ROAD BLOOMINGON, MN (612) PROJC LOC. COD: MIN GAUSS MRRYWOOD LAN MINNRISA, MN SH CONNS: GROUNDING PLAN GROUNDING PLAN CON. GROUNDING DAIL INDX 2 GROUNDING PLAN CON. SCAL: NS NORH 1 GROUNDING PLAN SCAL: NS NORH DRAWN BY: DA: CHCKD BY: WC APS RV. A RV. B G-2

26 POWR YP: 120/240V, SINGL PHAS, 200 AMPS NORH I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ROBR J. DAVIS, Reg. No PULLBOX LOCAION PLAN SCAL: 3/32" = 1'-0" Signed: Date: DSIGN W 9973 VALLY VIW RD. DN PRAIRI, MN (952) H H BUSH LAK ROAD BLOOMINGON, MN (612) PROJC LOC. COD: W MIN GAUSS MRRYWOOD LAN MINNRISA, MN SH CONNS: SI UILIY PLAN PULLBOX LOCAION PLAN NLARGD SI UILIY PLAN S S S SA RUNK HIGHWAY NO. 7 DRAWN BY: DA: CHCKD BY: WC APS RV. A RV. B NORH NORH 1 NLARGD SI UILIY PLAN SCAL: 1"=5'-4" 1 SI UILIY PLAN SCAL: 1"=30' U-1

27 S 988 SURVYOR NOS: (FORMR SA RUNK HIGHWAY NO. 7) S 988 SI SURVY HALSD BAY NORH 1" = 600' VICINIY MAP LOUS DRIV 0 NORH SCAL ( IN F ) ORINAION OF HIS BARING SYSM IS BASD ON H HNNPIN COUNY COORDINA SYSM NAD83 (1986) = DNOS A FOUND SCION CORNR MONUMN = DNOS A FOUND IRON MONUMN GODIC NORH GRID NORH MAGNIC NORH H GAS H GAS GAS W W 987 GAS W 984 GAS UG UG UG UG UG UG UG UG UG GAS MRRYWOOD LAN 985 UG 984 GAS 983 UG GAS UG GAS UG UG H GAS H H S W GAS UG LGND R DCIDUOUS R CONIFR SIGN GUARD POS GUY ANCHOR FNC POS LPHON PDSAL LPHON HANDHOL LCRIC POL CACH BASIN WAR VALV SANIARY MANHOL GROUND ACCSS COVR CHAIN LINK FNC UNDRGROUND GAS UNDRGROUND LCRIC OVRHAD LCRIC DG OF WOODS BOUNDARY LIN SCION LIN QUARR LIN SIXNH LIN RIGH OF WAY LIN ASMN LIN LO LIN CNRLIN BUILDING WALL HACH CONCR SURFAC GRAVL SURFAC SA COUNY SON LAK ROAD RUNK NO. 44 HWY. NO LAK MINNONKA XISING OWR SI W S 0 NORH SCAL ( IN F ) DAIL S 987 PID= SL PAK, LLC S S DAIL H H SA RUNK HIGHWAY NO DSIGN SI NAM: MIN GAUSS Hennepin County, MN No. Date RVISIONS FILD WORK: 6/29/17 CHCKD BY: SMK DRAWN BY: By CHK APP'D JPB/JMB I HRBY CRIFY HA HIS DOCUMN WAS PRPARD BY M OR UNDR MY DIRC SUPRVISION AND HA I AM A DULY LICNSD LAND SURVYOR UNDR H LAWS OF H SA OF MINNSOA. PRLIMINARY FULL SCAL ON 22"x34" HALF SCAL ON 11"x17" 0494A WIDSH SMIH NOLING WIDSH SMIH NOLING ngineering Architecture Surveying nvironmental

28 CIY OF MINNRISA PUBLIC HARING Subject: VARIANC: Application from ric & lisa ngesser for a 23 foot variance from the required 50 foot wetland setback to allow for an addition to the existing home to be located 27 feet from the delineated edge of the wetland on the property located at 1135 Marina Drive; R-1 Low Density Single-Family Residence Zoning District; PID# Prepared By: Nickolas Olson, City Planner Meeting Date: February 26, 2018 Overview: ric & lisa ngesser (the Applicants ) have requested a 23 foot variance from the required 50 foot wetland setback to allow for an addition to the existing home to be located 27 feet from the delineated edge of the wetland on the property located at 1135 Marina Drive (the Property ). Background: he Applicants are proposing a 3 story addition (walkout basement, main level and second level) to the south of the existing home and an extension to the north of the current deck which would encroach upon the 50' wetland setback. Staff has had discussions with the Applicants about their proposal and informed them of both the wetland delineation and variance processes that would be required to allow for the proposal as desired. A wetland delineation was performed during the late fall of he determination made from the wetland delineation is shown on the attached proposed survey. As the Planning Commission will see, the existing home already encroaches upon the required 50 wetland setback. his limits the Applicants options to propose a conforming addition. In review of the current floor plan for the home, the Applicants architect determined an addition onto the northwest side of the home is not a valid option. his is because it would require turning existing rooms into hallways and losing them as functional rooms. he Applicants narrative explains this in further detail and the floor plans are attached for reference. In the end, it was determine that exploring a variance was the most reasonable option available to the Applicants. Variance Request: City Code Section Subd. 9 allows the City to issue variances from the provisions of the zoning code. A variance is a modification or variation of the provisions of the zoning code as applied to a specific piece of property. A variance is only permitted when: Mission Statement: he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character.

29 a. he variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this ordinance. Section of City Code outlines the purpose and intent of the City s zoning regulations. In review of the Applicants proposal, it is consistent with this section. he proposal will not negatively affect the general public health, safety, morals, comfort, and general welfare of the inhabitants of the city. b. he variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. he Property is currently being used as a single family dwelling, consistent with the zoning and guided land use designation of the Property. he proposed addition will not change the use of the Property and there will be no change in neighboring views as the proposal meets all other required city code standards with regards to building height and setbacks from neighboring property lines. A variance may be granted when the applicant establishes there are practical difficulties in complying with this ordinance. Practical difficulties, as used in connection with granting a variance, means: 1. he property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this ordinance. he proposed addition complies with property line setbacks and is below the maximum height requirement. he purpose of the addition is to accommodate a larger family. he proposal has been designed to minimize the variance request with respect to the wetland while still accomplishing the necessary additional space desired by the Applicants to accommodate their large family. 2. he plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. he specific location of the existing home on the Property in relation to the wetland is something that is out of the control of the Applicants. Had the existing home been constructed as a mirror image, the proposed addition would not need a variance. 3. he variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. he essential character of the neighborhood will not be altered by the proposed addition. he addition has been designed with the scale, materials and character of neighboring homes in mind. Neighborhood Comments: Staff sent notices to all residents within 500 feet of the subject property. o date, staff has not received any comments or concerns from neighbors in regards to the requested variance. Conclusion: he Planning Commission should review the staff report and hold a public hearing. After holding a public hearing, findings of fact should be established as to why the request should be approved or denied. Findings of fact for approval are as follows: Mission Statement: he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character.

30 1. he proposed addition is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City s zoning ordinance; 2. he proposed addition is consistent with the City s comprehensive plan; 3. he proposed addition complies with property line setbacks and the maximum height requirement while minimizing the variance request, which is a reasonable; 4. he location of the existing home relative to the wetlands is out of the control of the Applicants as they are not the original owner or builder; 5. he existing home does not currently meet the required wetland setback which makes a complying addition challenging; and 6. he proposed addition has been designed with similar scale and materials of the existing homes in the area, which is consistent with the character of the neighborhood. Recommended Action: Motion to recommend the City Council approve the requested wetland setback variance at 1135 Marina Drive based on the findings of fact in staff report and subject to the following conditions: 1. he Applicants obtain all necessary permits and approvals from the City and other applicable entities with jurisdiction over the Property prior to any construction; 2. Any required grading should maintain existing drainage patterns or improve the existing drainage of the lot and adjacent lots; 3. No impacts to any wetlands shall occur as a result of grading or any other construction related activity unless the appropriate permits and approvals from the City and other applicable entities with jurisdiction over the Property have been received; 4. he Applicants are responsible for all fees incurred by the City in review of this application; and 5. he variance approval is valid for one year from the date of approval and will become void and expire unless a building permit has been issued for the site. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Narrative from Applicants 3. Proposed Survey 4. Proposed Plans & levations Mission Statement: he City of Minnetrista will deliver quality services in a cost effective and innovative manner and provide opportunities for a high quality of life while protecting natural resources and maintaining a rural character.

31 1135 Marina Drive 1 inch = 94 feet February 8, 2018 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates

32 Written Statements: 2a: ric and lisa ngesser 2b: Legal Description: Lot 009, Block 001, Parcel ID number Parcel Size:.8 acres; 34,818 sq. ft. xisting Use of Land: Homesteaded Single-Family Residence Current Zoning: R-1, Low Density Single-Family Residence 2c: We are seeking a variance to build an addition into the 50' wetland setback. Section Subd. 3 Wetland Buffering and Setbacks; Setbacks Required 2d: We are proposing a 3 story addition (walkout basement, main level and second level) to the south of our existing home and an extension to the north of our current deck which would encroach upon the 50' wetland setback. 2e: We have had a number of discussions via phone with Nick Olson regarding the need for a wetland delineation review and subsequent variance application. 2f: his proposal is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of Minnetrista City Code in that we are seeking to make our personal residence effective for our family without altering the character of our lot and neighborhood. We are seeking to maintain our established residence while increasing the liveable square footage of our home. Our lot is large enough to accommodate a larger home while keeping a large yard. 2g: i. he current house is constructed on the lot such that the existing SW corner of the home is within a few feet of the 50' wetland setback. he home owner is seeking to add onto their home to accommodate the needs of their growing family. hey need to add an additional bedroom on the upper level, a guest room on the lower level, and main level family room. Due to the existing floor plan and rooflines of the home, adding on to the north and west side of the home is not a valid option. (See included floor plans and renderings.) On all three levels, to add space to the north or west would require turning existing rooms into hallways and losing them as functional rooms. In contrast, while the addition as proposed creates a hallway through the existing master bedroom, there is still enough of that room remaining to function as a bedroom, thus making it possible to increase the number of bedrooms on the upper level. Likewise in the lower level, adding to the northwest renders the existing lower level bedroom unusable as a bedroom. From a massing standpoint, adding on space to the west of the garage would require substantial reworking of the rooflines of the existing home to ensure that water can drain from all roofs. he home owner is also looking to repair and enlarge the current deck in order to accommodate a seating and grilling area. he current deck is in need of repair and is too small to hold a table, chairs and a grill. here are also no stairs leading to the backyard, so we need to add a way to access the backyard from the deck. he proposed addition is a very reasonable proposal and is in

33 compliance with all aspects of the Minnetrista City Code with the exception of the location of the addition with respect to the wetland. ii. he specific location of the existing home on the property in relation to the wetland is something that is out of the control of the home owner. Had the existing house been constructed as a mirror image, the proposed addition would not need a variance. iii. he essential character of the neighborhood will not be altered by the proposed addition. he addition will be in keeping with the scale, materials and character of the existing homes in the area. It would not be encroaching on any neighboring property. 2h. he current home has four bedrooms (three on the upper level, one in the lower/basement level.) With seven children, the home owner has been creative with bedroom allocations, but needs to have additional bedroom spaces to give their growing children the opportunity for more elbow room. he current eat-in kitchen does not easily seat nine people, but taking over the existing family room for expanded dining space means additional space is needed for family gathering and entertaining other families with children. he current deck is too small, in need of repair, and provides no access to the backyard. 2i: Granting this variance will not adversely affect any aspects of our neighborhood. he addition proposed will not directly encroach any neighbor s property. Statements prepared in collaboration with Matt Glewwe, architect from G-Squared Designs.

34

35 oned walls are existing to remain. Light lines are existing to be removed. Dark lines are proposed. ypical all sheets.

36 xisting Deck Proposed Deck

37

38 White is existing, tan is proposed.