MEMORANDU. In the Matter of the Petition of BY: HON. BRUCE D. THE ROSLYN TORAH FOUNDATION, INC.,
|
|
- Barnard Houston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MEMORANDU M SUPREME COURT, COUNTY OF NASSAU, IAS PART 9 In the Matter of the Petition of BY: HON. BRUCE D. THE ROSLYN TORAH FOUNDATION, INC., MOTION SEQUENCE ALPERT #3 Petitioner, INDEX NO: 14790/99 For Review Pursuant to Article 78 of the CPLR of a certain determination of THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF NORTH HILLS, MOTION DATE: January 11,200l DATED: March 22,200l Respondent. Farrell Fritz, P.C. Attorneys for Petitioner EAB Plaza, West Tower Uniondale, NY Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C. Attorneys for Respondent 1505 Kellum Place Mineola, NY Application by petitioner, The Roslyn Torah Foundation, Inc., pursuant to CPLR article 78 for an order vacating and annulling several conditions imposed
2 upon the subdivision approval by the respondent, The Planning Board of the 2 Incorporated Village of North Hills, as ultra vires and outside its jurisdiction and as arbitrary and capricious is granted in part, and denied in part, and this matter is remitted to The Planning Board of North Hills for further consideration in accordance herewith. Petitioner is a religious corporation and record owner of a parcel of land located at the southerly side of I.U. Willets Road at the intersection of Shelter Rock Road in the Town of North Hempstead. Petitioner brings this Article 78 proceeding to challenge so much of a determination of The Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of North Hills dated March 10, 1999, as imposed certain conditions on its approval of a subdivision relating to the subject parcel. The Planning Board approved subdivision of petitioner s property into nine residential lots, and one institutional lot (Lot 10) with an existing building to be used for a synagogue, subject to twelve conditions. Three of the five disputed conditions require the Village Planning Board s prior consent or approval for the location and appearance of any extension, enlargement or relocation of the existing building or any new structure on Lot 10 (Condition 7); for any fence, barricade, post or other obstruction to access (Condition 8); and for any signs, banners or other displays facing or visible from 1-U. Willets Road or Shelter Rock Road
3 (Condition 9). Condition 10 requires that conditions one through five and seven 3 through nine be e mbod ied in a declaration of covenants and restrictions to be recorded against the institutional lot, and provides for attorneys fees should the V illage be required to seek enforce Cond m ent. ition 12 provides that in the event of default in ti m ely co m pliance w ith Condition 10, approval shall lapse. There w as an additional reference in Condition 12 wh ich w as a typographical error and respondent stipulates to its invalidation. Petitioner contends that the respondent i mp roperly equated petitioner s application for subdivision approval w ith one for site plan revie w, even though i w as not authorized to do so since the t wo p rocedures are statutorily distinct and serve different purposes. Petitioner contends that in N assau County, pursuant to section of the N assau County Charter, a village is authorized to exercise its jurisdiction extraterritorially only for the purpose of subdivision approval. Petitioner contends that neither the County Charter nor any other state la w g r the V illage authority to conduct a site plan revie w o f real property outside of the V illage boundaries. The respondent contends that it had authority pursuant to N assau County Charter $ to approve petitioner s application for subdivision of property located outside the V illage, but w ithin 300 feet of the mun icipal boundary, and tha
4 4 it approved the subdivision subject to various conditions which were related to this authority. The Board contends that none of the five challenged conditions constituted an effort by the Board to regulate or otherwise control any of the religious activities of petitioner and related only to the proposed development of petitioner s property. The Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of North Hills does not have zoning or site plan jurisdiction over petitioner s property, as it is not within the boundaries of the Village. However, pursuant to Nassau County Charter 1610, the Planning Board of the Village does have jurisdiction over the parcel s subdivision because the proposed subdivision is within 300 feet of the Village boundaries (Section 1610 [2] of the Nassau County Charter). This authority for approving subdivision plats is discrete from that for approving individual site plans (see, Riegert Apartments Corp. v Planning Board of the Town of Clarkstown, 57 NY2d 206,208 [Town Law granted power to compel contribution for money in lieu of parkland with regard to subdivision plat-approvals, but not with regard to individual site plans]). The distinctions have been outlined as follows: A site plan is not a subdivision plat. A site plan usually evidences the proposed development of a single lot... intended to remain in one ownership. A subdivision plat contemplates
5 division of one tract into a number of smaller lots with eventual separate ownership of each such lot. The authority which may be conferred upon pianning boards with respect to subdivision plats... are set forth specifically in the planning enabling acts. Site plans are not even mentioned in such acts. A site plan is a plan... showing the proposed location of the buildings, parking areas, and other installations on the plot, and their relation to existing conditions... (2 Rathkopf, Zoning and Planning [4th ed.], [1], pp [n omitted]). (R iegert Apart m ents Corp. v Planning Board of the To wn o f C larksto wn, NY2d 206,211, supra). The site-plan enabling statute permits a village planning board to consider means of access, parking, screening, signs, landscaping, architectural features, the location and dimensions of buildings, and the effect on adjacent land uses (Village Law a [2][a]), precisely the type of considerations addressed in the Village Board s conditions. In contrast, Village Law , the enabling statute addressed to subdivisions, regulates different areas of concern, including in general danger to health or peril from fire, flood, drainage or other menace to neighboring 5 properties or the public health, safety and welfare. (Village Law [ 11; see also Nassau County. Charter $ 1610[3]; M atter of D ia m ond v Specter, 39 AD2d 942,943, affd 32 NY2d 8 11). Section specifically permits a village planning board to require reservation of parkland and compliance with zoning regulations, and to consider the location, width and grade of highways, and the
6 6 place m ent of monuments at block corners. W ith respect to streets, it m ay require that all streets sho wn on plats be suitably graded and paved, and that all street signs, side walks, street lighting standards, curbs, gutters, street trees, water m ain fire alar m signal devices, sanitary se wers and stor m d rains be installed in accordance with the standards of the appropriate village depart m ents ( V illage La $ [2]-[4]; see also, Nassau County Charter $ [4]). The Nassau County Charter specifies several additional considerations to subdivision approval including the extent and nature of planting or screening where lots or plots back on existing highways, roads or streets on the plat, and the installation of side walks and curbs upon existing highways, roads or streets which intersect or bound the plat ( Nassau County Charter [4] [b], [d]). In su m, the enabling legislation distinguishes bet plan approval, and with respect to each local ween subdivision or plat approval and site mun icipalities [hlave only the la wm aking powers the Legislature confers on the (Kamhi m v Town of Yorktown, 74 NY 2d423,427). No twithstanding the foregoing distinctions, the V illage of North Hills is specifically e mpowered to perfor m bo th subdivision and site plan approval as a single process. Section 150-3(C) of the Code of the Village of North Hills provides that [tlhe Planning Board shall have authority to review and approve
7 7 sketch plats, preliminary plats and final plats and subdivisions... The Code defines subdivision to inciude the division of any parcel of land into more than one lot, and also to include a [slite plan... which shows the arrangement, layout and design of the proposed use of a single parcel of land as shown on said plan. (Code of the Village of North Hills, ). Thus, the Code of the Village of North Hills enables its Planning Board to merge plat and site plan approval in the subdivision process (Code of the Village of North Hills, $ [C], 150-l 8, ), and although the Village Code is thus inconsistent with state enabling statutes represented in the Village Law, the Village s supersession authority under Municipal Home Rule Law 5 lo( l)(ii)(d)(3) permits such merger, unless the legislature [elxpressly shall have prohibited the adoption of such a local law (K amh i v Town of Yorktown NY2d, ,430, supra). The Legislature has not prohibited consideration of plat and site plan approval together, and, were the Village Planning Board addressing a subdivision for property within the Village boundaries, its decision and conditions relating to site plan approval would withstand the challenge here presented. However, the exercise of its powers here is extraterritorial, and [olrdinarily, an ordinance has no efficacy beyond the limits of the municipality (City of Poughkeepsie v Vassar College, 35 Misc2d 604,606 [Supreme Court Dutchess
8 8 Coun ty]; see, M atter Huntington of Yacht Club v Incorporated Village of Huntington Bay, 272 AD 2d327,328; Incorporated Village of Port Jefferson v Consolidated Petroleum Terminal, Inc., 71 Misc2d 948 [Supre m e Court, Suffolk County]). Thus, the Board s expanded power under the Village ordinance is not applicable to petitioner s property, and the Board s authority w ith respect thereto derives solely fro m the N assau County Charter wh ich li m its the V illage s extraterritorial jurisdiction to traditional concerns under subdivision rules. W the Court is cognizant of isolated authority suggesting that si m ilar tests m a used for both site plans and subdivisions (see, Holmes v Planning Bd. of Town of New Castle, 78 AD2d 1, 16), the w eight of authority is to the contrary (see, Riegert Apartments Corp. v Planning Board of the Town of Clarkstown, 57 NY 2d206, supra; Moriarity v Planning Board of the Village of Sloatsburg, 119 AD 2d188; Pomona Pointe Associates v Incorporated Village of Pomona, 185 M isc2d 13 1, 137 [Supre m e Court, Rockland Coun ty] [ w ithin the process of subdivision approval, individual lots cannot be subjected to site plan revie w Thus, t his Court concludes that in its exercise of extraterritorial subdivision jurisdiction the V illage w as w ithout authority to i mpose conditions seven, eight and nine which are properly relevant to site plans. Respondent also contends that, not w ithstanding its lack of jurisdiction,
9 petitioner consented to inclusion of conditions eight and nine, and they should be upheld. 9 By letter dated March 4, 1999 counsel for petitioner made, in relevant part, the following representations to the Board: a) That Rabbi Kramer, on behalf of the North Hills Synagogue, acknowledges the Resolution approved by the Town of North Hempstead in relation to the site plan approval and further acknowledges the terms of same and that he and his Synagogue shall be bound by those terms; d) That the Synagogue agrees that it will not permanently barricade or obstruct that area where prior to this date wooden posts were erected. These posts no longer exist. The Synagogue has removed the temporary banner and acknowledges that prior to the installation of any other signs, approval and proper permits will be in place before the erecting of such signs. None of the foregoing representations requires the Board s consent or prior approval as do disputed conditions seven, eight and nine. Nor did petitioner consent to conditions seven, eight and nine at the public hearing. There petitioner consented to incorporation of the conditions imposed by the Town of North Hempstead. The agreed upon Town of North Hempstead conditions are: 7) The parking area is to remain accessible at all times. There shall be no fence, chain, gate or other means of restricting access
10 10 to the parking lot. 8) Any application for a sign permit must be reviewed by the Building Commissioner and Planning Commission as a Site Plan Modification under the provisions of ( M ) of the Town Code. The conditions imposed by the Village Planning Board go beyond the quoted conditions imposed by the Town, and in the absence of consent are ultra vires. Moreover, Condition 1 of the Village Board s determination specifically incorporates the Town challenged Condition s site plan approval. Given that the applicant has not l, the Board is free to require the applicant to specifically comply with conditions 7 and 8 as outlined in the Town s site plan approval. Petitioner does not address the Village Board s requirement of a covenant which runs with the land, except to object to the imposed obligation for attorney s fees. Attorneys fees are not recoverable absent statute, court rule or agreement providing for same (see, Matter of A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 NY2d 1, 5). As the Village s condition requiring petitioner to pay counsel fees is not authorized by statute, court rule or agreement, it must be stricken. Petitioner s remaining objection to the time limit requiring that restrictive covenants be filed within ninety days of final subdivision approval is not addressed in the papers. This time limit appears reasonable on its face, as it serves to place potential purchasers on notice of restrictions. Accordingly, Condition number 12
11 may remain in any approval issued by the Board on remand. 11 This concludes all proceedings under index number 14790/99. Settle Judgment on Notice. r u J.S.C. gqv xxx
STATE OF NEW YORK. Petitioners, SUBMISSION DATE: 07/12/04. Respondents. Notice of Motion/ Order to Show Cause... Answering Papers...
SHORT FORM ORDER Present: SUPREME COURT HON. KENNETH A. DAVIS. STATE OF NEW YORK In the Matter of an Article 78 Proceeding ROCKWOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP. and ARTHUR WISCOVITCH against- Justice TRIAL/lAS, PART
More informationPresent: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Agee, JJ., and Russell, S.J.
Present: Hassell, C.J., Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, and Agee, JJ., and Russell, S.J. BARRY E. SEYMOUR v. Record No. 061216 OPINION BY JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS APRIL 20, 2007 CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, ET
More informationMatter of Fortoso v State of New York Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2015 NY Slip Op 31895(U) September 18, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County
Matter of Fortoso v State of New York Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2015 NY Slip Op 31895(U) September 18, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: 260379/2015 Judge: Jr., Kenneth L. Thompson
More informationM E M O R A N D U M. In this Article 78 proceeding, petitioners Herman. Weingord and Hoover Owners Corp. seek a judgment vacating
M E M O R A N D U M SUPREME COURT: QUEENS COUNTY IA PART: 19 ------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of INDEX NO. 16751/05 HERMAN WEINGORD, et al., BY: SATTERFIELD, J. -against-
More informationARTICLE SINGLE FAMILY SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
ARTICLE 28.00 SINGLE FAMILY SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 28.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Article is to recognize that conventional single family developments, traditionally developed
More informationMemorandum: October 13, 2008 REVISED To: Trowbridge Township Planning Commission From: P. Hudson, AICP Re: Suggested New Ordinance
1 Memorandum: October 13, 2008 REVISED 2-11-09 To: Trowbridge Township Planning Commission From: P. Hudson, AICP Re: Suggested New Ordinance Because of changes in both the Michigan Planning Enabling Act
More informationARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS
ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 100 TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Rice Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance." SECTION 101 AUTHORITY Rice Township is empowered
More informationChapter 25. Road Improvements in Conjunction with Land Development
25-100 Introduction Chapter 25 Road Improvements in Conjunction with Land Development This chapter examines the authority of localities to require road improvements in conjunction with land development.
More informationMatter of Ortiz v Cooper Union for Advancement of Science & Art NY Slip Op 51733(U) Decided on August 8, Supreme Court, New York County
[*1] Matter of Ortiz v Cooper Union for Advancement of Science & Art 2003 NY Slip Op 51733(U) Decided on August 8, 2003 Supreme Court, New York County Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
More informationAppendix B. Correspondence
Appendix B Correspondence RICE & AMON ATTORNEYS AT LAW FOUR EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD SUITE 100 SUFFERN, NEW YORK 10901 (845) 357-4000 TERRY RICE * Fax: (845) 357-0765 SHELDON DAMSKY CLAUDIA AMON * ADMITTED
More informationMatter of Southampton Assn., Inc. v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Inc. Vil. of Southampton 2010 NY Slip Op 32107(U) August 5, 2010 Sup Ct, Suffolk
Matter of Southampton Assn., Inc. v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Inc. Vil. of Southampton 2010 NY Slip Op 32107(U) August 5, 2010 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: 002483/2010 Judge: John J.J. Jones
More informationBy F. Clifford Gibbons, Esq. 1
NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS MLUL DEFINITION OF APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINS ROLE OF MUNICIPAL ZONING OFFICIALS IN EVALUATING SUFFICIENCY OF DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS By F. Clifford Gibbons,
More informationOakwood Care Ctr., Inc. v Oakwood Operating Co., LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 32638(U) September 20, 2010 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number:
Oakwood Care Ctr., Inc. v Oakwood Operating Co., LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 32638(U) September 20, 2010 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 15823/07 Judge: Elizabeth H. Emerson Republished from New York
More informationNOTICE OF PETITION. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed petition of Mercedes Casado, Paul Hertgen and
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK--IAS PART ---------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of Mercedes Casado, Paul Hertgen,
More informationWhite County Subdivision Control Ordinance TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE, AUTHORITY, AND JURISDICTION 1.0 Title... 1.1 1.1 Purpose and Authority... 1.1 1.1.1 Purpose... 1.1 1.1.2 Authority... 1.2 1.2 Policy... 1.2 1.2.1
More informationNEW YORK COUNTY SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. r I Ws). I No(s). PART LIDD PRESENT: Justice -
UED ON412512013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: I index Numb&r : 1033W2012 ECHEVARRIA, ALICIA vs. WAMBUA, MATTHEW M. SEQUENCE NUMBER : 001 ARTICLE 78. Justice - - PART LIDD
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 153A Article 9 1
Article 9. Special Assessments. 153A-185. Authority to make special assessments. A county may make special assessments against benefited property within the county for all or part of the costs of: (1)
More informationADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CATEGORY: Development/Planning/Zoning TITLE: Vacation of Plats or Easements created through the platting process in accordance with Chapter 177, Florida
More informationMatter of DeJesus v New York City Hous. Auth NY Slip Op 31536(U) July 12, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Eileen
Matter of DeJesus v New York City Hous. Auth. 2013 NY Slip Op 31536(U) July 12, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 400618/2013 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Republished from New York State Unified
More informationSECTION 10 STANDARD PLATS
SECTION 10 - STANDARD PLATS Subdivision 1: Purpose Standard Plats allow the subdivision of land into lots smaller than the minimum metes and bounds size in the zoning district, and control road development
More informationNorgard v. Anmore (Village) Page 2 [1] THE COURT: This is an application pursuant to the Judicial Review Procedure Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 241 for a re
Citation: Between: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Norgard v. Anmore (Village), 2007 BCSC 1571 Gary Norgard and Sharon Norgard Date: 20071012 Docket: S070896 Registry: Vancouver Petitioners BCSC
More information201 General Provisions
201 General Provisions 201.01 Title 201.09 Amendments 201.02 Purpose and Intent 201.10 Public Purpose 201.03 Authority 201.11 Variances and Appeals 201.04 Jurisdiction 201.12 Nonconformances 201.05 Enactment
More informationCHAPTER 22 SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT. Part 1 General Provisions. Part 2 Application Procedure and Approval Process
CHAPTER 22 SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT Part 1 General Provisions 101. Title 102. Policy 103. Purposes 104. Authority 105. Jurisdiction 106. Interpretation, Conflict and Separability 107. Municipal
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2005 ST. JOHNS/ST. AUGUSTINE, COMMITTEE, ETC., Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D04-3519 CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA, ETC., ET
More informationMatter of 202 St., Inc. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2013 NY Slip Op 31742(U) June 10, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket
Matter of 202 St., Inc. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal 2013 NY Slip Op 31742(U) June 10, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 13576/11 Judge: Timothy J. Dufficy Republished
More informationBPP St Owner LLC v Carlotti 2016 NY Slip Op 32066(U) October 20, 2016 Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County Docket Number: 60387/15
BPP St Owner LLC v Carlotti 2016 NY Slip Op 32066(U) October 20, 2016 Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County Docket Number: 60387/15 Judge: Sabrina B. Kraus Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationCITY OF LAKE CHARLES
CITY OF LAKE CHARLES SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS UPDATED 04-06-05 AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION 79-1 FEBRUARY 19, 1979 EXHIBIT A SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS CITY OF LAKE CHARLES, LOUISIANA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SECTION
More informationFence Permit Application Information NOTE: Job is not to be started until permit is picked up and paid for.
Village of Ravena Building Department 15 Mountain Rd. Ravena, NY 12143 Phone: (518) 756-8201 Fax: (518) 756-8356 buildingdept@villageofravena.com Joseph J. Burns Building/Fire Inspector Sante DeBacco Asst.
More informationCase Name: B.C. Ltd. v. Anmore (Village)
Page 1 Case Name: 618061 B.C. Ltd. v. Anmore (Village) Between 618061 B.C. Ltd., Appellant (Petitioner), and The Village of Anmore and Anmore Woods Ltd., Respondents (Respondents) [2008] B.C.J. No. 925
More informationCertiorari not Applied for COUNSEL
1 SANDOVAL COUNTY BD. OF COMM'RS V. RUIZ, 1995-NMCA-023, 119 N.M. 586, 893 P.2d 482 (Ct. App. 1995) SANDOVAL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Plaintiff, vs. BEN RUIZ and MARGARET RUIZ, his wife, Defendants-Appellees,
More informationSUBDIVISION DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS
SECTION 15-200 SUBDIVISION DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS 15-201 STREET DESIGN PRINCIPLES 15-201.01 Streets shall generally conform to the collector and major street plan adopted by the Planning Commission
More informationWAYNE COUNTY, UTAH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
WAYNE COUNTY, UTAH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE A LAND USE ORDINANCE OF WAYNE COUNTY As Adopted by the Wayne County Board of County Commissioners Effective January 01, 2011 Prepared by: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 07-0548 444444444444 THE STATE OF TEXAS, PETITIONER, v. DAWMAR PARTNERS, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND HOWARD WAYNE GRUETZNER AND BEVERLY ANN GRUETZNER
More informationDep't of Buildings v. 7 Second Avenue, New York County OATH Index No. 2277/09 (May 22, 2009)
Dep't of Buildings v. 7 Second Avenue, New York County OATH Index No. 2277/09 (May 22, 2009) Petitioner established that premises is being used for impermissible advertising purposes. Respondents failed
More informationA. Application Procedure
A. Application Procedure 1. Submission. All applications for approval to make any exterior changes including color, additions or improvements must be submitted to the ACC in writing by completing the application
More informationDRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Formatting: Changes recommended by the Board and accepted by the County Commission are formatted in RED: Changes made by the Park County Commission are formatted in YELLOW highlight: and changes made by
More informationSubdivision and Development
Subdivision and Development Code of Ordinances Chapter 21 City of Richardson, Texas Table of Contents City of Richardson Code of Ordinances Chapter 21: I. In General...1 21-1. Title...1 21-2. Definitions...1
More informationSUBDIVISION APPLICATION
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Community Planning and Economic Development Development Services Division 250 South 4 th Street, Room 300 Minneapolis MN 55415-1316 612-673-3000 This application packet is used
More informationXIV. County of Hanover. Board Meeting: May 11, 2016
XIV. Agenda Item County of Hanover Board Meeting: May 11, 2016 Subject: Public Hearing Department of Public Works Conveyance of Signal Easement to Virginia Department of Transportation Fleet Services Facility
More informationSubdivision, Development Plan and PUD Design Standards Porter County Unified Development Ordinance
Chapter Subdivision, Development Plan and PUD Design Standards Porter County Unified Development Ordinance 20 Bradley E. Johnson, AICP website www.groundrulesinc.com Design Standards Section Name Page
More informationPreliminary Subdivision Application (Minor) (Three (3) lots or less)
Gunnison City Offices www.gunnisoncity.org 38 West Center Gunnison, Utah 84634 (435) 528 7969 Date of Application: Preliminary Subdivision Application (Minor) (Three (3) lots or less) APPLICANT INFORMATION
More informationMEMORANDUM Clallam County Department of Community Development
MEMORANDUM Clallam County Department of Community Development Date: April 27, 2007 To: From: Subject: Planning Commission Selinda Barkhuis, Senior Planner May 2, 2007 Planning Commission Work Session Enclosed
More informationENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO JULY TERM, 2018
Note: In the case title, an asterisk (*) indicates an appellant and a double asterisk (**) indicates a crossappellant. Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any
More informationPreliminary Subdivision Application (Major) (Four (4) lots or more)
Gunnison City Offices www.gunnisoncity.org 38 West Center Gunnison, Utah 84634 (435) 528 7969 Date of Application: Preliminary Subdivision Application (Major) (Four (4) lots or more) APPLICANT INFORMATION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed February 23, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wapello County, Michael R.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-087 / 10-0949 Filed February 23, 2011 MARGARET ELLIOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. WAYNE JASPER, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Wapello
More informationZONING AMENDMENT, SUBDIVISION & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 16, 2006
ZONING AMENDMENT, SUBDIVISION & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 16, 2006 NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Terhaar & Cronley Investment Partnership P & E Subdivision LOCATION 4210 and 4218 Halls
More informationAPPLICATION PROCEDURE
ANTRIM PLANNING BOARD P. O. Box 517 Antrim, New Hampshire 03440 Phone: 603-588-6785 FAX: 603-588-2969 APPLICATION FORM AND CHECKLIST FOR MINOR OR MAJOR SITE PLAN REVIEW File Date Received By APPLICATION
More informationORDER VACATED AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Division IV Opinion by CHIEF JUDGE DAVIDSON Plank* and Ney*, JJ., concur. Announced November 8, 2012
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 11CA2132 Board of Assessment Appeals No. 57591 James Fifield and Betsy Fifield, Petitioners Appellants, v. Pitkin County Board of Commissioners, Respondent
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT. } Appeal of Highlands Development Co., } Docket No Vtec LLC and JAM Golf, LLC } }
STATE OF VERMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COURT } Appeal of Highlands Development Co., } Docket No. 194-10-03 Vtec LLC and JAM Golf, LLC } } Decision and Order on Appellants Partial Motion for Summary Judgment This
More informationCHARLOTTE CODE CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY
CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY Section 1.101. Title. These regulations shall be known and may be cited as the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina. Section 1.102. Authority and
More informationCLINTON COUNTY ADDRESS ORDINANCE
CLINTON COUNTY ADDRESS ORDINANCE APRIL 28, 1992 ORDINANCE Clinton County Address Ordinance April 28, 1992 WHEREAS, the people of the County of Clinton have voted to establish an enhanced 9-1-1 Central
More informationChapter 21. Streets and Sidewalks
Chapter 21 Streets and Sidewalks 21-101. Provisions 21-102. Application for Permit 21-103. Issuance of Permit 21-104. Written Notice 21-105. Inspection 21-106. Penalties 21-201. Definitions 21-202. New
More informationDECLARATIONS OF COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS
THIS DECLARATION, made this 30 th day of December, 1969, by Jasper Valley Development Corporation, hereinafter called the Developer. WITNESSETH: Whereas, Developer is the owner of the real property described
More informationHorrigan Dev. LLC v Drozd 2017 NY Slip Op 30270(U) February 3, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Sylvia G.
Horrigan Dev. LLC v Drozd 2017 NY Slip Op 30270(U) February 3, 2017 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 503433/2013 Judge: Sylvia G. Ash Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationMap Filing Law. 46: Effective date This act shall take effect January first, one thousand nine hundred and fiftyfour.
46:23-9.8. Effective date This act shall take effect January first, one thousand nine hundred and fiftyfour. L.1953, c. 358, p. 1941, s. 8. 46:23-9.9. Short title This act shall be known and may be cited
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to May 30, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
More informationDECLARATIONS OF RESTRICTIONS, GRANTS, TRUSTS AND CHARGES AFFECTING THE LAND KNOWN AS
This is a consolidated and updated, but unofficial, version of PGL s original Declarations dated August 4, 1939 and September 14, 1954, as filed with the Rockland County Clerk at LIBER 373 PAGE 55 and
More informationCASE NO. L.T. No. 1D AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, CUSTOM MOBILITY, INC., PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. L.T. No. 1D07-4608 AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, vs. Petitioner, CUSTOM MOBILITY, INC., Respondent. On Discretionary Conflict Review of a Decision of the
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC01-1459 PER CURIAM. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. LUIS SUAREZ and LILIA SUAREZ, Respondents. [December 12, 2002] We have for review the decision in Allstate
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Pennsylvania Venture Capital, Inc., : Appellant : : No. 1199 C.D. 2012 v. : : Argued: December 12, 2012 The Planning Commission of the City : of Bethlehem and
More informationThe following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:
"R-E" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT (8/06) The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District: 1. Uses Permitted: The following uses are permitted. A Zoning Certificate may be required as provided
More information17.0 NONCONFORMITIES CHAPTER 17: NONCONFORMITIES Purpose and Applicability
17.0 NONCONFORMITIES 17.1 Purpose and Applicability The purpose of this section is to regulate and limit the continued existence of uses and structures established prior to the effective date of this Ordinance
More informationARTICLE 15. RULES, REGULATIONS AND DEFINITIONS
ARTICLE 15. RULES, REGULATIONS AND DEFINITIONS Section 1. Interpretation and Construction: The following rules and regulations regarding interpretation and construction of the Ulysses-Grant County, Kansas,
More informationWilliam S. Graessle of William S. Graessle, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees. In this eminent domain action, the JEA appeals a final order awarding
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JEA, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION ELWOOD SWYERS; EVONNE J. BAYER; LINDA
More informationARTICLE III GENERAL PROCEDURES, MINOR PLANS AND FEE SCHEDULES
ARTICLE III GENERAL PROCEDURES, MINOR PLANS AND FEE SCHEDULES 301. Prior to Submission a. Copies of this Ordinance shall be available on request, at cost, for the use of any person who desires information
More informationAPPENDIX B. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Master Major Site Minor Site Landscape Section B.1 Table of /Plat Requirements Proposed or approved name of development, project, subdivision, and/or phase. Location, including township, county, and state.
More information19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * PETITION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE MATTER OF: LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PERMITTING DECISION: WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION WQC 140708-02
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. L.T. CASE NO. 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. L.T. CASE NO. 4D04-3895 ELLER DRIVE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a : Florida Limited Partnership : : Respondent, : : v. : : BROWARD COUNTY, a Political : Subdivision of
More informationUrban Planning and Land Use
Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) 573-5750 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Fax: (913) 573-5796 Email: planninginfo@wycokck.org www.wycokck.org/planning To: From: City Planning
More informationH 7291 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
LC000 01 -- H 1 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO TOWNS AND CITIES -- REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES AND PROJECTS Introduced By: Representatives
More informationARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Section 15.1 - Intent. ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A PUD, or Planned Unit Development, is not a District per se, but rather a set of standards that may be applied to a development type. The Planned
More informationUPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOINDER DEED / LOT CONSOLIDATION TOWNSHIP REVIEW PROCESS When accepting proposed Joinder Deeds / Lot Consolidations, review the Joinder Deed
More informationSUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE. LaPorte County City of LaPorte City of Michigan City
SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE LaPorte County City of LaPorte City of Michigan City Adopted January 7, 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents Article 01 Basic Provisions 01.01 Preamble and Enacting Clause
More informationPage 1 of 6 Office of the Professions Land Surveying Practice Guidelines - February 2000 The State Board for Engineering and Land Surveying issued the first draft of its proposed Land Surveying Practice
More informationOhio Township Association
Ohio Township Association Easements, Drainage & Rights-of-way Chris Bauserman, PE, PS Delaware County Engineer Introduction Topics Road Right-of-Way Road Maintenance Drainage Road Signs Pavement Markings
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
No. 408 August 23, 2017 383 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON McKenzie BOWERMAN and Bowerman Family LLC, Respondents, v. LANE COUNTY, Respondent, and Verne EGGE, Petitioner. Land Use Board
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 21, 2018 525369 In the Matter of CHARLES F. JOHNSON et al., Petitioners, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
More informationTITLE 25. SUBDIVISIONS 1
TITLE 25. SUBDIVISIONS 1 Sections: Chapter 25.01 General Provisions. Section 25.01.01 Short Title. Section 25.01.02 Purposes. Section 25.01.03 Final Plat Required Before Lots May be Sold. Section 25.01.04
More informationLieberman v 244 E. 86th St., LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 32836(U) October 30, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Anil C.
Lieberman v 244 E. 86th St., LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 32836(U) October 30, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 156370/2013 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationGrand Palm (NY) LLC v Kamhi 2014 NY Slip Op 30877(U) April 7, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Eileen A.
Grand Palm (NY) LLC v Kamhi 2014 NY Slip Op 30877( April 7, 2014 Sup Ct, Ne York County Docket Number: 111981/2009 Judge: Eileen A. Rakoer Cases posted ith a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(,
More informationAs Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No
132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No. 368 2017-2018 Representative Lepore-Hagan Cosponsors: Representatives Holmes, Ingram, O'Brien, Reece, Sheehy A B I L L To amend sections 1343.01, 3781.10,
More informationIntroduction to the Subdivision Control Law. A Presentation by the Citizen Planner Training Collaborative
Introduction to the Subdivision Control Law A Presentation by the Citizen Planner Training Collaborative Introduction to the Subdivision Control Law A Presentation by The Citizen Planner Training Collaborative
More informationCHAPTER FINAL AND PARCEL MAPS
CHAPTER 19.48 FINAL AND PARCEL MAPS Section Page 19.48.010 General... IV-25 19.48.020 Phasing... IV-25 19.48.030 Survey Required... IV-26 19.49.040 Form... IV-26 19.48.050 Contents... IV-27 19.48.060 Preliminary
More informationORDINANCE 93-7 "EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE"
ORDINANCE 93-7 "EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE" AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF THE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF LAND IN HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA; IMPOSING AN IMPACT FEE ON LAND DEVELOPMENT
More informationCity of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report
City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report Agenda Item: 6D Meeting Date: August 9, 2017 Originating Agenda Section: Public Hearing Department: Community Development Resolution: X Ordinance:
More informationCHARTER TOWNSHIP OF KALAMAZOO KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. KALAMAZOO CHARTER TOWNSHIP SIDEWALK ORDINANCE
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF KALAMAZOO KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. KALAMAZOO CHARTER TOWNSHIP SIDEWALK ORDINANCE An Ordinance enacted pursuant to Michigan Public Act 246 of 1931 and Public Act 359
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2016-0158, Ken Henderson & a. v. Jenny DeCilla, the court on September 29, 2016, issued the following order: Having considered the briefs and record
More information7. EASEMENTS Label Established Lines Affecting Tract and/or Mentioned in its Legal Description:
7. EASEMENTS 7.010 General All sewers shall be constructed in easements with working room. Existing easements without working room may only be used if revised to include working room. All public sewers,
More informationSECTION 10.7 R-PUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ZONE
Article X Zones 10-20 SECTION 10.7 R-PUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ZONE A. PURPOSE AND INTENT: The R-PUD Residential PUD Zone is intended to provide alternative, voluntary zoning procedures
More informationSUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU - PART 19. Respondents.
...... SHORT FORM ORDER Present: SUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU - PART 19 HON. WILLIAM R. LaMARCA Justice 'S6t KESE INDUSTRIES, as Assignee of the Mortgage of Theodore Roosevelt Council,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR BINDING ARBITRATION - HOA Indian Lake Estates, Inc.,
More informationCOLLIER COUNTY Growth Management Department Engineering Review Services
COLLIER COUNTY Growth Management Department Engineering Review Services October 13, 2015 Josh Fruth Davidson Engineering, Inc. 4365 Radio Rd Suite 201 Naples, FL 34104 Re: Final Site Development Plans
More informationTOWN OF ROXBURY PLANNING BOARD
UPDATED: APRIL 2011 TOWN OF ROXBURY PLANNING BOARD Applicant s Guide for Subdivision Review The Town Planning Board administers the subdivision review process. This guide has been prepared in order to
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. BENJORAY, INC., v. Plaintiff-Respondent, ACADEMY HOUSE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER,
More informationASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 213th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JUNE 23, 2008
ASSEMBLY, No. 0 STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JUNE, 00 Sponsored by: Assemblyman JOHN F. MCKEON District (Essex) Assemblyman UPENDRA J. CHIVUKULA District (Middlesex and Somerset) Assemblyman
More informationORDINANCE NO
TOWNSHIP OF ANDOVER, COUNTY OF SUSSEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY ORDINANCE NO. 2014-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ANDOVER, COUNTY OF SUSSEX, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO AMEND CHAPTER 190, ZONING, ARTICLE
More informationTOWN OF LERAY PLANNING BOARD Minor Subdivision Application Packet
This Packet is designed to assist applicants in providing the forms needed for submission of a 1 to 4 lot subdivision to the Planning Board for approval. The following should be filled out to ensure the
More informationZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: August 8, 2013
ZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: August 8, 2013 NAME SUBDIVISION NAME PV-Magnolia, LLC Twelve Trees Subdivision LOCATION 2860, 2862 and 2866 Pleasant Valley Road
More informationPlanning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the amendment to Article 4, Article 7, and Article 14 as presented by Staff on 6/19/17.
DATE: June 20, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Planning Director Zoning Ordinance Amendment Article 4, Article 7, and Article 14 related to accessory uses, fences, walls, and administrative
More information