IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY
|
|
- Lucas Campbell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO OF 2013 (HRC) BETWEEN : SMT. KEMPAMMA W/O SRI PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.43/1, 1ST MAIN 2ND CROSS, MYSORE ROAD VALMIKINAGAR BANGALORE PETITIONER ( BY SRI. PRABHUGOUD B TUMBIGI, ADVS. FOR M/S. M.T.NANAIAH ASSTS. ) AND : SRI B.H.RAGHU S/O LATE HEMANNA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO. 73, 6TH CROSS 1ST MAIN, VALMIKINAGAR BANGALORE RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ART. 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED PASSED BY THE CHIEF JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT BANGALORE IN HRC NO.265/2011 ON INTERIM APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 43 OF THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT, 1999 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; DIRECT THE TRIAL
2 2 COURT TO ALLOW THE APPLICATIONS FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 43 OF THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT 1999 VIDE ANNEXURE-D; AND ETC. THIS WP COMING ON FOR PRL. HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Petitioner aggrieved by the order dt. 6/11/2012 in HRC No. 265/11 of the Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore, rejecting the application under Sec.43 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, has presented this petition. 2. Respondent instituted HRC No. 265/11 for eviction of the petitioner arraigned as respondent therein from the petition schedule premises. That petition was opposed by filing statement of objections interalia denying the jural relationship of Landlord and tenant, contending that one Muniswamy N., the owner of the petition schedule premises though put her in possession of the said property as a tenant, nevertheless, executed an agreement of sale by receiving a consideration of Rs.70,000/-, specific performance of which is subjectmatter of O.S.6594/11 and in which the eviction petitioner
3 3 is also arraigned as a defendant. Before the rent court, the petitioner filed I.A. under Sec.43 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, to stop all further proceeding and direct the parties to approach the competent court of civil jurisdiction for declaration of their rights. That application was opposed contending that the eviction petitioner, respondent herein purchased the petition schedule premises from Smt.Lakshmi Devi, widow of deceased N.Muniswamy, following which the revenue records were transferred into the name of the purchaser and taxes are being paid. The eviction petitioner asserted that there was a rent agreement dt. 10/12/1998 between N.Muniswamy & the tenant pursuant to which was inducted into the petition schedule premises on a monthly rental of Rs.600/- apart from payment of an advance of Rs.10,000/-. The rent court having regard to the pleadings of the parties framed a point for consideration as to whether petitioner proves the existence of jural relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties? The rent court having regard to the material on record, more appropriately Ex.P1, the sale deed executed by Smt.
4 4 Lakshmi Devi, the widow of N.Muniswamy in favour of the eviction petitioner and revenue records such as khatha certificate, etc., Ex.P2 to P6 and the rent agreement dt. 10/12/1998, Ex.P7 between N.Muniswamy the husband of the vendor of the eviction petitioner and the tenant pursuant to which the tenant was inducted in the petition schedule premises on monthly rental of Rs.600/- with an advance amount of Rs.10,000/-, recorded a finding that prima facie there was a material to establish the jural relationship of Landlord and tenant between the parties. The rent court following the reported opinion of this court in BASAVARAJ VS. PUTTARAJU (SINCE DECEASED) BY HIS LRS. & ANR. 1, accordingly answered in the affirmative the point for consideration and by the order impugned, rejected the application. 3. Although learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the execution of the agreement of sale between N.Muniswamy and the petitioner (tenant) while as a tenant of the petition schedule premises, is subject (3) Kar.L.J. 619
5 5 matter of specific performance in O.S.6594/11 pending before the City Civil Court, that by itself and nothing more cannot be a ground to invoke Sec.43 of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, to stop all further proceedings and direct the parties to the Civil Court for declaration of their rights. The rent court having regard to the material on record, more appropriately the sale deed-ex.p1 executed by the widow of deceased N.Muniswamy conveying the petition schedule premises absolutely, in favour of the eviction petitioner, coupled with Ex.P7, the admitted agreement of lease between the said N.Muniswamy and the tenant under which she was put in possession of the petition schedule premises on a monthly rental of Rs.600/-, there was prima facie evidence of jural relationship of Landlord and tenant between the parties. If Sec.109 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, is applied, then the transferee of the lessor ie., the eviction petitioner would sit in the shoe of the lessor, whereunder the tenancy would stand attorned. This view is supported by the decision in SILVAUDDIN VS. NAGARAJU (7) Kar.L.J. 484
6 6 4. The plea of the petitioner that while as a tenant in respect of the petition schedule premises, an agreement of sale was executed by the landlord N.Muniswamy in her favour and therefore the tenant claims that her lesser interest as a tenant got extinguished and blossomed itself in to a larger interest namely that of a purchaser, whereby the petitioner is no more a tenant, deserves rejection. The Apex Court in JOSEPH KANTHARAJ & ANR. VS. ATTHARUNNISA BEGUM S. 3 observed thus: 10. We may however clarify that a mere assertion by a tenant that he is in possession in part performance of an agreement of sale, or the mere filing of a suit for a specific performance, by itself will not lead to deferment of the eviction proceedings under Sec.43 of the New Act. But where the respondent in an eviction proceeding under the Rent Act denies the relationship of landlord and tenant contending that he is not in possession as a tenant and produces and relies upon an agreement of sale in his favour which confirms delivery of possession in past performance, and a specific performance suit (3) Karl.L.J. 182 (SC)
7 7 is pending and there is no lease deed, or payment of rent from the date of such agreement of sale, or no acknowledgment of attornment of tenancy, Sec.43 of the new Act may apply. But a word of caution, Courts dealing with summary proceedings against tenants under Rent Acts for eviction, should be wary of defendants coming forward with defences of agreement of sale, lest that becomes a stock defence in such petitions. Unless the Court is satisfied prima facie that the agreement is genuine and defence is bonafide, it should not defer the proceedings for eviction under the Rent Acts. 5. On the facts and material in this case, the rent court was fully justified in its decision not to stall the proceedings under Sec.43 of the Karnataka Rent Act and direct the parties to seek declaration before the Civil Court. 6. The observations of this court and that of the rent court is limited to the point of consideration as to whether there is prima facie material to establish the jural relationship and nothing more. In the event petitioner
8 8 succeeding in O.S.6594/11, she will be entitled to seek restitution, if evicted. Petition devoid of merit, is rejected. rd/- Sd/- JUDGE
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 15.02.2016. + RC.REV. 345/2015 & C.M. Nos.12498/2015 & 23221/2015 MADAN MOHAN SINGH... Petitioner Through Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT Date of Judgment: RC.REV. 264/2011 & CM No.13063/2011 (for stay)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT Date of Judgment: 19.3.2012 RC.REV. 264/2011 & CM No.13063/2011 (for stay) RAKESH SUD... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sachdeva,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10 th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2133/2006 C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL
More informationCRP NO. 363/2009. Sri Prasanta Kumar Prasanta Bose, S/o Late Nepal Chandra Bose, Residents of Central Board, Silchar Town,
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO. 363/2009 Sri Prasanta Kumar Bose @ Prasanta Bose, S/o Late Nepal Chandra Bose, Residents of Central Board,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No.2925/2011 1. Sri Suren Singha, S/o. Sri Mukta Singha. 2. Smti. Promila Devi, W/o. Sri Mukta
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT. Date of Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT Date of Judgment: 25.01.2012 CM(M) Nos. 1771-72/2005 & CM Nos.4748/2008 & 10925/2009 SARDAR DALIP SINGH LOYAL & SONS Through Mr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MANOHAR. ITA No.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MANOHAR ITA No.1012 OF 2008 BETWEEN; Shri.C.N.Anantharam
More informationWP(C) No of 2010
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) WP(C) No. 5887 of 2010 1. Md. Rafique Ahmed. 2. Md. Abdul Aziz. 3. Md. Niazuddin Ahmed. 4. Md. Sarifuddin Ahmed.
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. OMP No. 264/2009 %
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 26.8.2009 Date of Order: 9 th October, 2009 OMP No. 264/2009 % 09.10.2009 Shriram Pistons & Rings Ltd.... Petitioner Through: Mr. T.K.Ganju, Sr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 Date of decision: 10th January, RFA No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 Date of decision: 10th January, 2014. RFA No.350/2013 LALIT MADHAN.. Appellant Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.
More informationKILLARNEY MALL PROPERTIES (PTY) LTD J U D G M E N T
NOT REPORTABLE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 33005/2010 DATE: 28/09/2010 In the matter between:- KILLARNEY MALL PROPERTIES (PTY) LTD Applicant And MEDITERRANEAN KITCHEN CC t/a ANAT AND
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI WRIT PETITION NOS.45616 & 45629-59/2012(S-RES) BETWEEN : 1 SRI K L GANGADHARAIAH
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 726 of 2014]
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3333 OF 2018 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 726 of 2014] NON-REPORTABLE Kedar Nath Kohli (Dead) by LRs... Appellants Versus Baldev
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + RFA No.544/2018. % 17 th July, versus. Through: CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA No.544/2018 % 17 th July, 2018 NAVIN CHANDER ANAND Through:... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Dalip Mehra, Advocate. versus UNION BANK
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT CM(M) 880/2012 Judgment delivered on: 5th December, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT CM(M) 880/2012 Judgment delivered on: 5th December, 2013 RAKESH JAIN... Petitioner Through: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Senior Advocate with
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 155 of 2018
1 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (Arising out of Order dated 12 th March, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi Bench, New Delhi, in CP
More informationAPPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Beatrice J. Brickhouse, District Judge
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2014-NMCA-097 Filing Date: July 22, 2014 Docket No. 32,310 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA The Allegheny West Civic : Council, Inc. and John DeSantis, : Appellants : : v. : No. 1335 C.D. 2013 : Argued: April 22, 2014 Zoning Board of Adjustment of : City
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 03-462 CABLE PREJEAN VERSUS RIVER RANCH, LLC ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. 20012534 HONORABLE DURWOOD
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION. Petitioners, RULING AND ORDER JENNIFER E. NASHOLD, CHAIRPERSON:
STATE OF WISCONSIN TAX APPEALS COMMISSION ROBERT J. LAWRENCE AND CHARLES M. KEMPLER (DEC'D), DOCKET NO. 05-T-83 Petitioners, vs. RULING AND ORDER WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. JENNIFER E.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.2846 OF 2017 VERSUS WITH
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2846 OF 2017 Bijender & Ors..Appellant(s) VERSUS State of Haryana & Anr. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.2847-2848,
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
REL: 05/15/2015 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 Date of decision: 15th February, 2012 CM(M)48/2011.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 Date of decision: 15th February, 2012 CM(M)48/2011 SANTOSH VAID & ANR. Through: Mr. Som Dutta Sharma, Adv....Petitioners Versus
More informationDecided On: Appellants: Common Cause (A Registered Society) Vs. Respondent: Union of India and Ors.
MANU/DE/1843/2001 Equivalent Citation: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)545, 96(2002)DLT477, 2002(61)DRJ838 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI Civil Writ Petition No. 522 of 1997 Decided On: 19.12.2001 Appellants: Common Cause
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT JACQUELINE GRANGER AS INDEPENDENT ADMINSTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JUSTIN BOUDREAUX **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-1392 JACQUELINE GRANGER AS INDEPENDENT ADMINSTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JUSTIN BOUDREAUX VERSUS TRI-TECH, LLC ********** APPEAL FROM THE THIRTY-FIRST
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: B, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: B, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 2736/Del/2015 Assessment Year: 2014-15 VINOD SONI, C/O
More informationSIND ORDINANCE No. XVII OF 1979 THE SIND RENTED PREMISES ORDINANCE, 1979 C O N T E N T S
Preamble C O N T E N T S Section 1. Short Title and Commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Applicability. 4. Controller. 5. Agreement between Landlord and Tenant. 6. Tenure of Tenancy. 7. Higher rent not chargeable.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN. COLONIAL HOMES AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LIMITED Formerly called BALMAIN PARK LIMITED AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL No. 47 OF 2007 BETWEEN COLONIAL HOMES AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LIMITED Formerly called BALMAIN PARK LIMITED AND APPELLANT KASSINATH
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DANIEL WESNER, d/b/a FISH TALES, Appellant, v. Case No. 2D16-4646
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.1300 OF 2009 VERSUS JUDGMENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION NON-REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL No.1300 OF 2009 SURAJ NARAIN KAPOOR AND OTHERS...APPELLANT(s) VERSUS PRADEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS...RESPONDENT(s) JUDGMENT
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA International Development : Corporation, : Appellant : : v. : No. 1805 C.D. 2010 : Argued: June 6, 2011 Sherwood B. Davidge and Calvery : Crary, their heirs, executors,
More informationJackson County Courthouse 3rd Floor Civil Records 415 E. 12th Street RM 305 Kansas City, MO (816)
Western Jackson County (Kansas City, Grandview) (All cases where the property is located in Kansas City or Grandview should be filed in Western Jackson County, at the Kansas City (downtown) Courthouse.)
More informationForman Fifth LLC v Hong Shik Kim 2010 NY Slip Op 32287(U) June 7, 2010 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 21456/2009 Judge: Patricia P.
Forman Fifth LLC v Hong Shik Kim 2010 NY Slip Op 32287(U) June 7, 2010 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 21456/2009 Judge: Patricia P. Satterfield Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationChapter 7: Vacancy Rent Increases
Chapter 7: Vacancy Rent Increases 700. New Maximum Allowable Rent Pursuant to Civil Code Section 1954.50, et seq. as amended,, the Landlord may establish the lawful Maximum Allowable Rent for any Controlled
More information[Cite as Maggiore v. Kovach, 101 Ohio St.3d 184, 2004-Ohio-722.]
[Cite as Maggiore v. Kovach, 101 Ohio St.3d 184, 2004-Ohio-722.] MAGGIORE, APPELLEE, v. KOVACH, D.B.A. ALL TUNE & LUBE, APPELLANT. [Cite as Maggiore v. Kovach, 101 Ohio St.3d 184, 2004-Ohio-722.] Landlords
More informationMANDATORY RENT DEPOSITS?; TENANTS USE DELAYING TACTICS TO GAIN EDGE IN CURRENT SYSTEM 1
New York Law Journal March 11, 1996 MANDATORY RENT DEPOSITS?; TENANTS USE DELAYING TACTICS TO GAIN EDGE IN CURRENT SYSTEM 1 Probably the most hotly debated area of landlord-tenant litigation involves the
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT SUCCESSION OF SANDRA JEAN DEAL **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 13-200 SUCCESSION OF SANDRA JEAN DEAL ********** APPEAL FROM THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF IBERIA, NO. 21170 HONORABLE JAMES R. MCCLELLAND,
More informationPROCEDURE FOR MUTATION OF PROPERTY IN ASSESSMENT & COLLECTION DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
PROCEDURE FOR MUTATION OF PROPERTY IN ASSESSMENT & COLLECTION DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI Change of name of taxpayer u/s 128(5) of the DMC Act is culmination of notice of transfer / devolution
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. BENJORAY, INC., v. Plaintiff-Respondent, ACADEMY HOUSE CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER,
More informationThe Court and its staff CANNOT tell you what you should do about your problem.
Judge Douglas Zwiener Justice of the Peace Washington County Pct. One 1305 East Bluebell Road, Suite 114 Brenham, Texas 77833 Phone: 979-277-6260 ~ Fax: 979-277-6296 EVICTIONS The information contained
More informationCase 8:13-bk MGW Doc 391 Filed 07/01/14 Page 1 of 12
Case 8:13-bk-10798-MGW Doc 391 Filed 07/01/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION www.flmb.uscourts.gov In re: 2408 W. Kennedy, LLC, Case No. 8:13-bk-10798-MGW
More informationJUSTICE COURT, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. Name: ) ) CASE NO.: Landlord, ) DEPT. NO.: ) -vs- ) ) Name: ) Address: ) ) Phone: ) )
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 JUSTICE COURT, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA Name: CASE NO.: Landlord, DEPT. NO.: -vs- Name: Address: Phone: of the Complaint. of the Complaint. Tenant. TENANT S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FOR UNLAWFUL
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Adams v. Glitz & Assoc., Inc., 2012-Ohio-4593.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97984 BERNARD ADAMS PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) CASE NO: 26533/2008 IN THE MATTER OF:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) IN THE MATTER OF: CASE NO: 26533/2008 PROC CORP 160 (PTY) LTD (CONVERTED FROM A CC) APPLICANT AND INTERACTIVE TRADING 626 (PTY) LTD
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on: % Judgement delivered on:
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on: 19.01.2016 % Judgement delivered on: 03.02.2016 + CO.PET. 415/2015 IN THE MATTER OF LEADING POINT POWERTRONICS PRIVATE LIMTED... Petitioner
More informationWHEATHER RENTING OF PROPERTY IS SERVICE AND THUS LIABLE TO SERVICE TAX?
1 WHEATHER RENTING OF PROPERTY IS SERVICE AND THUS LIABLE TO SERVICE TAX? By: MUKUL GUPTA, Tax Advocate R-13/24, Raj Nagar, Ghaziabad Tel :+91120-2820380, 2821407 Mobile: +919811023739 e-mail: mukuladv@hotmail.com
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 25, 2006 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 25, 2006 Session BILLY R. INMON v. BRETT HADLEY, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Jefferson County No. 19,964-IV & 19,965-I Ben W. Hooper,
More informationOPINION. No CV. Tomas ZUNIGA and Berlinda A. Zuniga, Appellants. Margaret L. VELASQUEZ, Appellee
OPINION No. Tomas ZUNIGA and Berlinda A. Zuniga, Appellants v. Margaret L. VELASQUEZ, Appellee From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2005-CI-16979 Honorable David A.
More informationPRESENT: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, and Kinser, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice
PRESENT: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, and Kinser, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice LINDA H. WOHLFORD OPINION BY v. Record No. 990320 SENIOR JUSTICE HENRY H. WHITING January 14, 2000 GLADYS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC10-90 / SC10-91 (Consolidated) (Lower Tribunal Case No. s 3D08-944, )
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-90 / SC10-91 (Consolidated) (Lower Tribunal Case No. s 3D08-944, 03-14195) JOEL W. ROBBINS (Miami-Dade County Property Appraiser); IAN YORTY (Miami-Dade County
More informationRIGHTS OF SECURED CREDITOR UNDER THE SECURITISATION ACT AGAINST TENANTED SECURED ASSET
RIGHTS OF SECURED CREDITOR UNDER THE SECURITISATION ACT AGAINST TENANTED SECURED ASSET Supreme Court Judgment on Harsh Govardhan Sondagar v. International Assets Reconstruction Company Ltd - A Shot In
More informationTITLE 38 LUMMI NATION CODE OF LAWS LANDLORD AND TENANT CODE
TITLE 38 LUMMI NATION CODE OF LAWS LANDLORD AND TENANT CODE Enacted: Code L-42 (11/3/1975) Amended: Resolution 2006-158 (12/4/2006) Resolution 2016-014 (1/5/2016) Chapter 38.01 Jurisdiction and Scope
More informationEviction Scenarios. And All Occupants
Eviction Scenarios Bronson Tucker, Director of Curriculum, TJCTC NTJPCA Convention, October 2018 And All Occupants Landlord gives notice and files eviction on John Doe and all occupants for a non-rent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LEESBURG COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a INTERCOMMUNITY CANCER CENTER,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-315 LEESBURG COMMUNITY CANCER CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a INTERCOMMUNITY CANCER CENTER, Appellant/Petitioner, vs. LEESBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,
More informationADDRESSES MUST BE CORRECT
An Unlawful Detainer actions is a Special Summary Proceeding, lawsuit that entitles the landlord to statutory priority over other civil cases. Your action still falls in this class as long as procession
More informationtl tp ntr J ClJI lctt COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2009 CA 0568 VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA MISTY SOLET TAYANEKA S BROOKS
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2009 CA 0568 MISTY SOLET VERSUS tl tp TAYANEKA S BROOKS I V On Appeal from the City Court of Denham Springs Parish of Livingston Louisiana Docket No 18395
More information91 Real Estate Assoc. LLC v Eskin 2013 NY Slip Op 31181(U) June 4, 2013 HCIV, New York County Docket Number: 78814/2012 Judge: Sabrina B.
91 Real Estate Assoc. LLC v Eskin 2013 NY Slip Op 31181(U) June 4, 2013 HCIV, New York County Docket Number: 78814/2012 Judge: Sabrina B. Kraus Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 30, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-420 Lower Tribunal No. 14-11578 Adeena Weiss Ortiz,
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 28, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-439 Lower Tribunal No. 15-18141 Bankers Lending Services,
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida LEWIS, C. J. No. SC05-2045 S AND T BUILDERS, Petitioner, vs. GLOBE PROPERTIES, INC., Respondent. [November 16, 2006] We have for review the decision in S & T Builders v. Globe
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA ( SOUTH GAUTENG)
2132/13-PF 1 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA ( SOUTH GAUTENG) JOHANNESBURG CASE NO : 2132/13 DATE : In the matter between THE MEDIA CUBE (PROPRIETY) LIMITED Applicant and VIVIDEND INCOME FUND
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + Date of Decision: versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
$~12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision: 07.12.2015 % RSA 162/2015 VINOD KUMAR JAIN & ORS... Appellant Through: Mr. S.C.Singhal, Advocate versus VINOD SRIVASTAVA & ORS... Respondent
More informationISSUES RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LEASING. U.S.A., ALABAMA Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C.
ISSUES RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LEASING U.S.A., ALABAMA Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C. CONTACT INFORMATION Robert R. Sexton Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C. 1901 Sixth Avenue North 2400 Regions/Harbert Plaza Birmingham,
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2016-0158, Ken Henderson & a. v. Jenny DeCilla, the court on September 29, 2016, issued the following order: Having considered the briefs and record
More informationREPAIR AND REMEDY CASE INSTRUCTIONS
REPAIR AND REMEDY CASE INSTRUCTIONS There are generally four types of Landlord/Tenant issues that present themselves in justice court: 1) Evictions (see Texas Property Code, Chapter 24) 2) Illegal lockouts
More informationHow to Answer Your Eviction Case
How to Answer Your Eviction Case Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc. Tenants Rights Project Renters Education and Advocacy Legal Lines (REAL) https://sites.google.com/site/reallsgmi www.lsgmi.org WHAT
More informationTHE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FLORIDA WEST REALTY PARTNERS, LLC Petitioner, Case No.: SC07-155 Lower Court Case No.: 2D06-5808 v. MDG LAKE TRAFFORD, LLC, Respondent. / PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Mark
More informationH 7816 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
LC001 01 -- H 1 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO TAXATION -- TAX SALES Introduced By: Representative Robert E. Craven Date Introduced:
More informationH 7816 AS AMENDED S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
======== LC001 ======== 01 -- H 1 AS AMENDED S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO TAXATION -- TAX SALES Introduced By: Representative Robert
More informationORDER VACATED AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Division IV Opinion by CHIEF JUDGE DAVIDSON Plank* and Ney*, JJ., concur. Announced November 8, 2012
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 11CA2132 Board of Assessment Appeals No. 57591 James Fifield and Betsy Fifield, Petitioners Appellants, v. Pitkin County Board of Commissioners, Respondent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (DCA 1DO2-4491) KEETON CORRECTIONS, INC., d/b/a JACKSONVILLE MINIMUM SECURITY SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITY.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (DCA 1DO2-4491) KEETON CORRECTIONS, INC., d/b/a JACKSONVILLE MINIMUM SECURITY SUBSTANCE ABUSE FACILITY Petitioner, v. RJ & RK, INC., a corporation and KIMBERLY KEETON SPENCE,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO.3625 of Versus. Army Welfare Housing Organization & Ors..
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3625 of 2006 [REPORTABLE] New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA)..APPELLANT Versus Army Welfare Housing Organization
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS WILLIAM KULINSKI, RONALD KULINSKI, and RUSSELL KULINSKI, UNPUBLISHED December 9, 2014 Plaintiffs-Appellees, v No. 318091 Lenawee Circuit Court ILENE KULINSKI, LC No.
More informationIn the matter of- CITICORP MARUTI FINANCE LIMITED, PETITIONER / TRANSFEROR COMPANY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT Date of Judgment:21.11.2012 COMPANY PETITION NO: 398 of 2012 (ORDINARY ORIGINAL COMPANY JURISDICTION) In the matter of- CITICORP MARUTI FINANCE
More informationQUESTION 2: SELECTED ANSWER A
QUESTION 2: SELECTED ANSWER A 1. Interests in Greenacre To determine who has what interest in Greenacre (G), the validity and effect of each transfer/agreement must be determined. Generally, property may
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE CLAIM: No. 275 of 2007 AND
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE 2007 CLAIM: No. 275 of 2007 BETWEEN: WARD MCGREGOR CLAIMANT AND WILLIAM NEAL AND ATTORNEY GENERAL (for the Minister of Natural Resources and the Environment DEFENDANT/ANCILLARY
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed October 24, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D12-1728 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationThrough: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Ratish Kumar, Advs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR... Respondents Through: Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi, Adv. for R-1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 2003 Date of decision: 22nd December, 2014. W.P.(C) No.8302/2014 & CM No.19254/2014 (for stay) BALRAJ SINGH MALIK...
More informationS18A0430. CLAYTON COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS v. ALDEASA ATLANTA JOINT VENTURE.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: June 18, 2018 S18A0430. CLAYTON COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS v. ALDEASA ATLANTA JOINT VENTURE. BENHAM, Justice. This case presents the issue of whether the contract
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JACQUELYN THOMPSON WILLIAM F. THOMPSON Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: BRIAN L. OAKS Kokomo, Indiana LAWRENCE R. MURRELL Kokomo, Indiana IN THE COURT
More informationCAPITAL GAINS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS-When Chargeable to Tax
CAPITAL GAINS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS-When Chargeable to Tax CAPITAL GAINS- CHARGEABILITY Sec 45(1) : Capital Gains tax liability arises only when the following conditions are satisfied:- A. There
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-0312 Seward Towers Corporation, Appellant, vs.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KENNETH H. CORDES, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 7, 2012 v No. 304003 Alpena Circuit Court GREAT LAKES EXCAVATING & LC No. 09-003102-CZ EQUIPMENT
More information(Complete Section 3 ONLY if you received a Three-Day Notice to Quit for Nuisance/Waste/Etc.)
JUSTICE COURT, TOWNSHIP OF CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA Landlord's Name: Tenant's Name: Address: City,State,Zip: Phone: E-Mail: vs. Landlord, Case No.: Dept No.: TENANT'S AFFIDAVIT/ANSWER IN OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY
More informationUNLOCKED PROPERTIES 4 (PTY) LIMITED A COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES CC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG REPORTABLE Case No: 18549/2015 In the matter between: UNLOCKED PROPERTIES 4 (PTY) LIMITED Applicant and A COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES CC
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In the Estate of Lawrence Marra, Sr. : and the Estate of Francesca Marra : : No. 2062 C.D. 2013 v. : : Submitted: June 16, 2014 Tax Claim Bureau of Lackawanna
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ELBERT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ELBERT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA CITY OF ELBERTON, GEORGIA, ) ) CONDEMNOR, ) ) CIVIL ACTION v. ) FILE NO. 16-EV-281M ) 0.013 ACRES OF LAND IN THE ) CITY OF ELBERTON, ) ELBERT COUNTY,
More informationReleased for Publication November 2, COUNSEL
1 FINCH V. BENEFICIAL N.M., 1995-NMSC-068, 120 N.M. 658, 905 P.2d 198 (S. Ct. 1995) IN RE: CLETE NORMAN FINCH and MARY LOUISE FINCH, Debtors. CLETE NORMAN FINCH and MARY LOUISE FINCH, Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants,
More informationM J SAUER/OWNER NO CA-0197 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL SANDRA JOHNSON FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
M J SAUER/OWNER VERSUS SANDRA JOHNSON * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2012-CA-0197 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM FIRST CITY COURT OF NEW ORLEANS NO. 2011-03735, SECTION D Jacob
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC08-2297 THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. SHARI NICOLE HINES, Respondent. [June 10, 2010] We have for review a referee s report recommending that respondent,
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, Koontz, and Kinser, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice
Present: Carrico, C.J., Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, Koontz, and Kinser, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice JOSEPH B. SWEENEY v. Record No. 991810 OPINION BY JUSTICE CYNTHIA D. KINSER April 21, 2000 WEST GROUP, INC.
More informationReal Estate Committee ABI Committee News
Real Estate Committee ABI Committee News In This Issue: Volume 8, Number 5 / August 2011 Absolute Assignment of Rents Does Not Always Bar Debtor s Use of Business Income for Reorganization Efforts Right
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RICHARD KEITH MARTIN, ROBERT DOUGLAS MARTIN, MARTIN COMPANIES OF DAYTONA BEACH, MARTIN ASPHALT COMPANY AND MARTIN PAVING COMPANY, Petitioners, CASE NO: 92,046 vs. DEPARTMENT
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: OCTOBER 2, 2009; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2008-CA-002271-MR DRUSCILLA WOOLUM, LAVETTA HIGGINS MAHAN, RUFUS DEE HIGGINS, AND ARLINDA D. HENRY
More informationNO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E OCTOBER 31, 2008 DION S OF TEXAS, INC.
NO. 07-07-07-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E OCTOBER 1, 008 DION S OF TEXAS, INC., v. Appellant SHAMROCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellee ST FROM
More informationCLAIRE CROWLEY & a. TOWN OF LOUDON THE LEDGES GOLF LINKS, INC. CLAIRE CROWLEY. Argued: September 21, 2011 Opinion Issued: December 8, 2011
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MELANIE J. HENSLEY, successor to RON SCHULTZ, as Citrus County Property Appraiser, etc., vs. Petitioner, Case No.: SC05-1415 LT Case No.: 5D03-2026 TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Golden Horn South Condominium Association,
More informationWhat is the Constitutional provision on foreign ownership of land in the Philippines?
Monday, November 03, 2008 Property rights of foreigners married to Filipino citizens; Can foreigners own land and other real properties in the Philippines? The Supreme Court in the August 2006 case of
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Whiting, 1 Hassell, and Keenan, JJ.
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Whiting, 1 Hassell, and Keenan, JJ. Lacy, CAPITAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC. v. Record No. 941926 OPINION BY JUSTICE LEROY R. HASSELL September 15, 1995 VINA
More information