DECEMBER 1, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING
|
|
- Elwin Scott
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 1, 2016 SUBJECT: REQUEST TO DEMOLISH SIX UNITS AND CONSTRUCT A NEW, THREE-STORY, 11-UNIT MUL Tl-FAMILY COURTYARD BUILDING OVER SUBTERRANEAN PARKING AT 1016 MARTEL AVENUE INITIATED BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (David J. DeGrazia, Planning Manager, CHPP) (Jennifer Alkire, AICP, Senior Planner) (Laurie Yelton, Associate Planner) STATEMENT ON THE SUBJECT The proposal is a request to demolish six units in order to construct a new, threestory, 18, 150-square-foot, 11-unit multi-family apartment courtyard building over subterranean parking. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission hold a public hearing, consider all pertinent testimony, and approve the request subject to the conditions in Draft Resolution PC : 1) Draft Resolution No. PC : ''A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A DEMOLITION PERMIT, DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, AND A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR THE DEMOLITION OF SIX DWELLING UNITS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW, THREE-STORY, ELEVEN-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY COURTYARD BUILDING OVER SUBTERRANEAN PARKING, LOCATED AT 1016 N. MARTEL AVENUE, WEST HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA." (EXHIBIT A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This project proposes to demolish six dwelling units on three contiguous parcels and construct a new, three-story, 11-unit, apartment building (all market rate units) over subterranean parking. The site is approximately 14,010 square feet and is zoned R3B (Residential, Multi-Family Medium-Density).The multi-family dwelling complies with the standards for residential districts, multi-family dwellings, courtyard housing, and general development standards. The design is exemplary and is consistent with the massing of the neighboring dwelling units and those in the surrounding neighborhood. The applicant is requesting three courtyard housing incentives, and three 10% modifications to the proposed project. Page 1of14 ITEM 10.A.
2 The three courtyard housing incentives requested are: 1.) to allow a maximum of 50% compact parking spaces, 2.) to allow the building to extend into the front yard setback, and 3.) to allow the building to extend into the rear yard setback. The three modifications requested are: 1.) to reduce the entire front yard setback by 10%, 2.) to reduce the entire rear yard setback by 10%, and 3.) to increase the maximum allowable unit size 10% from 1,500 square feet to 1,650 square feet. Additionally, the building qualifies for exemplary design per Section of the WHMC, which exempts the building from the 6'-0" step-back on the front of the building on the second and third floors. Overall, the proposed project meets the general plan goals and the multi-family development standards, is well-suited for ~he subject site, is thoughtfully designed, and is complementary to the context of the neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this project. BACKGROUND Application Information A. Date of Application: B. Application Deemed Complete C. Applicant: D. Property Owner: E. Location: F. Zoning I General Plan: December 1, 2015 July 22, 2016 Jeff Seymour, Seymour Consulting Group Martel Dup LLC., Martel Sak LLC., Neman Assets LLC 1016 Martel Avenue and 7339 & 7349 Romaine Street R3B (Residential, Multi-Family Medium Density) I R3 Page 2 of 14
3 G. Environmental Status: H. Public Notices: Categorically Exempt per CEQA Section (In-fill Development Projects) The public hearing was advertised and noticed in accordance with the W.H.M.C. Section Site and Area Conditions The subject site is located on the east side of Martel Avenue on the corner of Romaine Street, and south of Santa Monica Boulevard. The site consists of three contiguous lots. The southernmost parcels are located at 7339 & 7349 Romaine Street and the northernmost parcel is located at 1016 Martel Avenue. Each of the three sites is developed with two units. Through the lot line adjustment process, the project site will be given the unified address of 1016 Martel Avenue. The project site is approximately 100 feet in width along Martel Avenue and 140 feet in length along Romaine Street for a total lot size of approximately 14,010 square feet (.32 acres). Page 3of14
4 This portion of Martel Avenue, north of Romaine Street, is developed with a wide variety multi-family and single-family residential dwellings of various stories as well as a 29,000-square-foot commercial building to the east, and adjacent to the subject site on the corner of Romaine Street and Fuller Avenue. In addition, there is a large, two-story multi-family residential building south of the project site across Romaine Street as well as a 55-unit apartment building south-west of the subject property at the corner of Romaine Street and Martel Avenue. Romaine Street divides the City of West Hollywood to the north and the City of Los Angeles to the south. - Zoned R3B (Residential, Multi-Family Medium Density) - To the north North of the subject site is a single-story, single-family dwelling. This site, if developed, could have a minim!jm of five units. City of Los Angeles - To the south of the subject site is a two-story, South. multi-family building and the Poinsettia Recreation Center as well as a park across Romaine Street. Zoned CC2 (Commercial, Community 2) - To the east of the subject East site, on the corner of Romaine Street and Fuller Avenue, is a two-story, 29,000-square-foot commercial building (Quixote Production Studios). West Zoned R3B (Residential, Multi-Family Medium Density) - To the west I of the subject site are a mix of single-family and multi-family residential buildings. Environmental Review The proposed project is categorically exempt from the CEQA requirement for preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section (In-fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines since the project is 1) consistent with the general plan and zoning designation and regulations; 2) occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; 3) the site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; 4) approval would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and 5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The proposed building has been designed within the standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Page 4of14
5 Based on the City's threshold, a development that generates 500 or more daily trips or 60 or more net peak hour trips would have a measurable impact to streets. As proposed, the traffic associated with the development of 11 residential units replacing six dwelling units is anticipated to generate a net of 33 daily trips, 3 morning hour peak trips, and three afternoon peak hour trips. Therefore, based on the City's criteria, the project will not exceed the City's impact threshold and no further traffic analysis is required. The noise levels in the area would be affected on a temporary basis during construction, however an extensive construction period mitigation plan which aims to minimize noise intrusion and facilitate response to any problems encountered during construction. Long-term noise impacts are not anticipated as a result of this residential project, as the use is typical for a multi-family zone. Neighborhood Meeting On January 13, 2016, a neighborhood meeting was held at Plummer Park to present the project and discuss any concerns with the neighbors. The meeting was advertised by mailing to all residents and property owners within a 500-foot radius of the subject site. There were approximately 12 attendees at the meeting. The neighbors had concerns regarding privacy as well as the scale and massing of the building. There was an expressed desire to see additional modulation in order to reduce the perceived height of the building. Additionally, there were concerns about pedestrian and traffic congestion along Romaine Street. Since the neighborhood meeting, the project has been revised multiple times and has addressed the massing and privacy concerns including reducing terrace sizes, reducing the number and height of windows, and incorporating clerestory windows where possible. With the exception of the modification requests for a 10% reduction in the front and rear yard setbacks and the 10% increase in the maximum allowable unit size, the project meets all code requirements. Design Review Subcommittee Meeting The project was reviewed by the Planning Commission Design Review Subcommittee qn February 11, The Subcommittee responded positively to the design of the project, modulation of the building, and window projections of the building. They were favorable of the interior courtyard and the layout of the building. The Sub-Committee requested additional landscaping and screening to enhance privacy of the neighbors, which has been provided. Public Comment At the time the staff report was published, staff had received comments from an adjacent neighbor with regard to privacy, privacy screening between properties, and the trash/recycling location. Staff and the applicant worked with the neighbor to address all concerns: Planting of a 6' tall bamboo hedge along the northerly property line, the installation of a planter for tall screening plants, screening of the balconies along the north property line, and moving the trash/recycle location from the north side of the property to the sou~h side of the property along Romaine Street. Conditions 8.8 and 8.9 of the Draft Resolution addresses the neighbor's concerns. Page 5of14
6 ANALYSIS Project Proposal The request is to demolish six dwelling units on three contiguous parcels on the east side of Martel Avenue at the corner of Romaine Street and combine the three parcels into one large parcel through a lot line adjustment. The applicant is requesting three courtyard housing incentives, and three 10% modifications to the proposed project per Sections and of the West Hollywood Municipal Code (WHMC). The modifications and courtyard housing incentives are separate. The following modifications are being requested: Reduce the entire front yard setback by 10% (from 28'-6" to 25'-8"); Reduce the entire rear yard setback by 10% (from 15'-0" to 13'-6"); and Increase the maximum average unit size by 10% (from 1,500 sf to 1,650 sf). The following Courtyard Incentives are being requested: Provide nine of 27 parking spaces to be compact parking spaces (less than 50%); A projection of 7'-4" into a portion of the rear yard setback on the first floor of the building (Unit D sf) for a 5'-0" rear yard setback for Unit D; and A projection of 8'-8" into a portion of the front yard setback on the first floor (Unit A - 71 sf, Unit K sf) for a 18'-5" front yard setback for Units A and K. This is for the construction of a new, three-story, 11-unit courtyard multi-family building with 27 parking spaces located within a subterranean garage. The proposed building is designed utilizing the City's Courtyard Housing Standards (Section ). As such, the project qualifies for Courtyard Housing incentives discussed in further detail below. The combined site is approximately 14,010 square feet (0.32 acres), and is zoned R3B (Residential, Multi-Family Medium-Density). The base density for this site allows 11 units. The applicant has elected to pay the in-lieu/impact affordable housing fee into the City's Housing Trust Fund (Per Section Table 3-5 of the WHMC), so the proposed project will include all market rate units. There are two two-bedroom units, and nine three-bedroom units in the project. Parking is provided within a subterranean parking garage that includes 22 residential spaces, three guest spaces and an extra space, for a total of 27 parking spaces. Pursuant to Section of the WHMC, Off-street Parking and Loading Standards, two spaces are provided for each of the two- and threebedroom units. In addition, one guest parking spaces is required for every four dwelling units. There are 14 tandem parking spaces, and 13 single parking Page 6 of 14
7 spaces, of which nine spaces are compact spaces. There are also two handicapaccessible parking spaces. Residential Multi-family Standards The proposed project generally complies with the standards for residential districts (Chapter 19.06), multi-family dwellings (Section ), Courtyard housing projects (Chapter ), and general development standards (Chapter 19.20). The following table summarizes the requirements and project compliance with minimum standards: Development Standard Permitted/ Required Proposed Density Maximum average unit size One unit per 1210 sf of lot area lot 11 units area is 14,010 sf= 11 units On-site affordable required or pay in-lieu affordable housing impact. fee 1,500 sq. ft. In lieu affordable housing impact fee will be paid 1,650 sf* (Modification #1) Height Front yard setback Side yard setback Rear yard setback Parking Private open space Common open space Driveway width (max.) Front facade 35 feet I 3 stories. Average of adjacent properties = 28'-6" required Additional 6 feet for 2 d and upper stories. : 6'-0" interior side yard 5'-0" street side yard 15'-0" : 22 spaces/2-3bd unit (22 spaces) : and 1 guest space/4 units (three : spaces)= 25 required parking ' spaces Up to 50% allowed compact. spaces per courtyard housing incentives. ; 120 sf per unit 1000 sf : 24'-0" maximum width 50% habitable space w/ private entry 35 feet I 3 stories 25'-8"* (Modification #2). 28'-6"-10%= 25'-8"** (Exemplary Design) 18'-5" (Unit A and Unit K)*** (Courtyard Incentive) 6'-0" 5'-0" 13'-6"* (Modification #3) 5'-0" (Unit D)*** (Courtyard Incentive) 27 spaces provided (two extra spaces) 14 tandem, 13 single spaces. Nine spaces are compact (33%)*** (Courtyard Incentive) Minimum 120 sf per unit provided. 1,370 sf provided in the cou.r!y_ard 20'-0" wide driveway Over 50% of the front fa9ade contains habitable space, entrance to the courtyard as well as the building itself provided at street fa9ade. Page 7 of 14
8 Development Standard Permitted/ Required Proposed Front yard setback paving. Maximum 45% of FYSB paved (max.) 45% of FYSB is paved. ::;::a~~~le surface in, At l~ast 50% p~rmeable.. ~:;~;~~o~~~:~~~!~~~~s will *Modification: Section allows a 10% modification of a development standard **Exemplary Design: Section WHMC allows a waiver of the 6'-0" setback for floors above the first floor ***Courtyard Housing Incentive: allows the granting of incentives at the discretion of the review authority Courtyard Housing Courtyard Housing Requirements The proposed project is designed utilizing the Courtyard Housing standards and incentives set forth in Section of the West Hollywood Municipal Code. These standards are intended to encourage the construction of housing designed around a central courtyard element, and provide for certain incentives for qualifying projects. In order to qualify, a project design must incorporate a number of elements of courtyard housing buildings. A matrix is provided as Exhibit B to demonstrate how the project meets and complies with the courtyard housing standards. Courtyard Housing Incentives In exchange for providing a courtyard building with amenities for the residents, the applicant requests to use three of the five available project incentives: provide a maximum of 50% compact parking spaces; allow a portion of the building to extend into the front yard setback; and allow the building to extend into the rear yard setback. The applicant is requesting to provide nine of the 27 parking spaces (approximately 33%) as compact parking. Normally, compact parking is not allowed for residential projects, but for projects meeting the courtyard design standards, up to 50% of the required parking may be provided as compact spaces. The applicant is also requesting to encroach a total of 216 square feet of the front of the building (Units A and K) into the front yard setback 7'-4" for a front yard setback of 18'-5" from the front property line for these two units. A portion of the rear of the building (Unit D) encroaches 8'-8" into the rear yard setback for 196 square feet, which places the building 5'-0" from the rear property line at the furthest point of encroachment. These incentives to encroach into the front and rear yard setback for portions of the building allow the mass and height of three stories to blend into the surrounding one and two story buildings within the neighborhood. Without the encroachment, the building would appear as a three story mass viewed from the Page 8 of 14 _
9 street. With the encroachment, the building mass is broken down into a singlestory volume that protrudes out into the front yard and a two-story volume stacked on top while still allowing for a courtyard at the ground level. The encroachment complies with Courtyard Housing Front Setback Incentive per (E) and Courtyard Housing Rear Setback Incentive per (0). At the front setback, the portion of the building that encroaches is 20'-0" wide and the encroachment is 7'-4". At the rear setback, the portion of the building that encroaches is 20'-0" wide and the encroachment is 8'-8". Modifications Per Section of the WHMC, a 10% modification to any development standard may be approved with or without conditions if the decision maker determines that the request will have insignificant impacts on adjacent properties. The applicant is requesting three 10% modifications: reduction to the front yard setback, reduction to the rear yard setback, and an increase to the average unit size permitted in the R3B zone from 1,500 square feet to 1,650 square feet. The required front yard setback for a multi-family residential building in the R3B zone is determined by averaging the front yard setbacks of the two adjacent properties, which is 28'-6" for the subject property. With a 10% reduction, the front yard setback is 25'-8". The required year yard setback for the proposed multi-family residential building is 15'-0". The applicant is requesting a 13'-6" rear yard setback. The maximum allowable unit size in the R3B Zone is 1,500 square feet. The applicant proposes to increase the maximum allowable unit size by 10% to 1,650 square feet. The projections into the front and rear yard setbacks allow the applicant to accommodate the "L" shaped courtyard design. The first floor elements of the structure project into the front setback with the remainder of the unit set back more than six feet from the property line. At the rear of the building, the adjacent commercial property is located very close to the property line, however it is of minor significance because the portion of the building encroaching into the rear setback are mostly single story with the exception of structures at the north-east corner. Staff finds that incorporation of these project incentives is appropriate for the site and a 10% modification is reasonable and justifiable as it helps achieve the desired courtyard design. Affordable Housing The City's requirements for the provision of affordable housing are provided in the West Hollywood Municipal Code (WHMC) Chapter Affordable Housing Requirements and Incentives. Subparagraph B.2, requires rental projects with eleven or more units to include 20% affordable units or to pay the Page 9of14
10 in-lieu/impact fee. The applicant has elected to pay the in-lieu/impact affordable housing fee into the City's Housing Trust Fund. Therefore, this project does not include an affordable housing density bonus or incentives. Current Rent Stabilization & Housing Status As of November 2, 2016, all six units are occupied by renters. This includes all three properties with six units (1016 Martel Avenue, 7349 Romaine Street, and 7339 Romaine Street. All three properties are rent stabilized. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant will be responsible for removing the properties from the housing market following the requirements of the Rent Stabilization Ordinance and the Ellis Act, and provide proof to the City that all requirements for tenant relocation including payment of relocation fees have been met. If new rental units are constructed and offered for rent within five years of the Ellis date, the new. rental units shall be subject to the full Rent Stabilization Ordinance (WHMC Title 17). Community Amenities All multi-family projects in the City of West Hollywood are required to provide a number of resident amenities. Among such amenities are: laundry facilities, private storage, and common and private open space areas. The proposed project is designed with amenities for residents that meet, and exceed, the requirements including: The 1,370 square-foot courtyard with multiple gathering spaces and seating areas; A small amenity room of approximately 312-square-feet adjacent to and opens into the central courtyard. The amenity room will include a full kitchen and powder room and will be accessible to the residents. These project amenities will strive to increase the community atmosphere of the building, with residents sharing and gathering within the courtyard and common areas. Because of the size and scale of the proposed project, it is able to achieve this basic, but often elusive goal of multi-family housing. Urban Design Analysis Site Configuration and Landscape Design The project is proposed as a series of units around and "L" shaped courtyard space. There is a 20' x 20' space identified in the plans adjacent to a community room. This space combines with the common open space to provide a generous amenity space with landscaping, including a 36" box Fern Pine, built-in seating and entries for each unit. Since review by the Planning Commission Design Review Subcommittee, the landscaping and configuration in the courtyard has been modified to include one full-size tree and multiple planters with built-in seating. This provides a balance between landscape and hardscape, provides useable and flexible space while creating niches for unit entries. Page 10of14
11 Entries to the courtyard off both Martel and Romaine are positive features that help break up the massing and provide a pedestrian-friendly experience around this corner project. The entries to the "L" shaped space shall remain open and inviting to maximize these benefits. There is a sloped floor shown on Martel that leads to the entry. This shall be maintained at less than 5% slope, as shown, so that it will not become a ramp and require railings. Gates shall be ornamental and highly transparent. Landscaping provided in these entry areas is low enough to enable visibility into the courtyard while providing sufficient landscape to soften the space and provide scent and color. The subterranean garage is pulled back from the property line on all four sides, enabling in-ground planting. The landscape design and plant palette in the setbacks along Martel Avenue and Romaine Street are well-designed, droughttolerant, and present a variety of texture and color that works well together. Screen planting and vines have been provided along the north and east property lines. The transformer pad is appropriately located at the southeast corner of the project, next to the adjacent commercial property. All other utilities and equipment shall be integrated into the design of the building and properly screened per Condition 8.10 in the Draft Resolution. In order to accomplish the courtyard design, the applicant requests reduced setbacks at the front and rear. In the front, the single story elements project into the setbacks with the balance of the units set back more than six feet. The project design has a varied and three-dimensional configuration at the front. While it does not adhere to the six-foot step-back requirement, its threedimensionality meets the intent of that provision. In the rear, the adjacent property is developed with commercial buildings at or near the property line. Most of the area that extends into the rear setback is one story, with the exception of the northeast corner of the project which is two stories. The reduced setbacks appear to fit within the context, and enable the "L" shaped court which is a benefit to the project and the urban design. Martel Avenue Elevation (West) Page 11 of 14
12 ~ ~-"'- - ' - J!fz r _mr_ 1 _:::;;_-~ -~-; ~ '1: - ~ - _,,,.:.; -..!!!;r_ - r ==-i, - CW'K.."*"'~ i 1 ~-"*' L j I "i I 1 ~ t-- Site Plan Exhibiting Size and Form of Central Courtyard Mass and Scale The project is a mix of one, two, and three story structures, arranged around an "L" shaped courtyard. The units are staggered in a way that visually identifies each unit and breaks down the scale of the building. Along both Martel Avenue and Romaine Street the ground floor is emphasized with patios, projections, and varying materials to further break down the massing. In the neighborhood meeting, there was a request to further break down the massing. As proposed, the project is a nice balance of heights and different forms. The one and two story structures off-set the three story structures located at the corners. Breaking down the massing further would likely compromise the integrity and composition of the design. The Design Review Subcommittee had a very positive response to the project design, massing and courtyard configuration. The Subcommittee suggested refinements in the materials to for a more sophisticated expression. The architect has responded by varying locations of materials and introducing textured or raked stucco to further break up the massing. The window size, placement and configuration have also been refined to ensure maximum light with a lively composition on the exterior. Windows on the north side have also been revised to ensure privacy for the adjacent neighbor. Page 12of14
13 Design and Detailing The materials and details reinforce the clear design concepts. The materials on the exterior elevation include wood paneling and different colors and textures of plaster. Per Condition 8.11 in the Draft Resolution, staff recommends use of rough plaster finish with darker colors- rough plaster can attract dirt and should not be used with lighter colors. The window size and pattern on the street elevations appear interesting and help to provide an appropriate sense of scale. The projecting windows will add detail and shadow on the elevations. Larger windows on east elevation will provide light ahd air with little impact on the adjacent commercial property. The courtyard elevations have fewer openings to ensure privacy for the units. As project develops, ensure operable windows for cross-ventilation, and additional scoring shall be used for larger areas of stucco per Condition 8.12 in the Draft Resolution. Private open space is provided on multiple roof decks. Roof decks have been moved away from the north side of the project and screened with landscaping as conditioned in the Draft Resolution (Condition 8.13). Gutters and downspouts are conditioned (Condition 8.14) be internal or incorporated into the design to be less conspicuous. Design Summary The project design meets the exemplary standard, which exempts the project from stepping back the front of the building an additional six feet on the second and third floor, is well-designed and properly scaled to its surrounding context and unique site. The courtyard design meets the intent of the Courtyard Housing standards by providing a social space for the residents with entries to each unit. The project has a clear and legible architectural idea while broken into different well defined units. The units are then broken into several forms, relating well to the surrounding context. The courtyard design and landscaped setbacks will enhance the pedestrian orientation of the building and enhance the overall experience on this residential corner. Green Building The project employs a number of sustainable features throughout. In particular, the courtyard strategy enables passive solar and ventilation throughout. West Hollywood Municipal Code Section requires new buildings to adhere to a point system wherein the applicant chooses from a range of options on the Green Building Point System Table to ensure that the building will help achieve the City's goals of conserving natural resources, increasing energy efficiency, and improving indoor air quality. All qualifying new projects are required to include elements that add up to 60 points. The proposed project incorporates features designed to earn a total of 66 green building points, including Energy Star Program, using composite wood, installing exterior shading devices on the south and/or west facing windows, and incorporating Flyash or Slag Ash in the concrete. Page 13of14
14 WEST HOLLYWOOD STATUTES AND FINDI NGS OF FACT The application for the proposed 11-unit project above subterranean parking requires approval of a Master Permit, Demolition Permit, Development Permit, Lot Line Adjustment, and Modifications by the Planning Commission, as indicated in Sections (Demolition Permits) and (Development Permits) of the West Hollywood Municipal Code (WHMC) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The specific findings are described in Draft Resolution No SUMMARY The applicant is requesting to combine three contiguous parcels along Martel Avenue, demolish all structures on the site, and to construct a new three-story, 27,077 square foot, 11-unit building with 27 subterranean parking spaces. The project is located at 1016 Martel Avenue in West Hollywood, on the east side of Martel Avenue, north of Romaine Street and south of Santa Monica Boulevard. The applicant requests three 10% modifications pursuant to Section of the WHMC: 1) reduction in front yard setback, 2) reduction in the rear yard setback, and 3) and increase in the average unit size. The applicant also requests three Courtyard Housing Incentives per Section of the WHMC: 1) to allow up to 50% of the required parking spaces to be compact spaces, 2) allow portions of the front of the building to encroach into the front yard setback, and 3) allow portions of the rear of the building to encroach into the rear yard setback. The project is designed using the City's Courtyard Housing standards and qualifies for these incentives. The building qualifies for exemplary design, per Section of the WHMC, which prevents the building from the 6'-0" step-back on the second and third floors. All requirements of the Courtyard Housing, Municipal Code, and General Plan have been met, and the project is compatible with the diverse nature of the existing neighborhood. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the requested Master Permit, Demolition Permit, Development Permit, Lot Line Adjustment, and Modifications with conditions in Draft Resolution No. PC EXHIBITS A. Draft Resolution No. PC B. Courtyard Housing Matrix C. Courtyard Housing encroachments into the front and rear yard setback diagram D. Radius Map E. Project Plans and Renderings Page 14 of 14
PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: REQUEST TO DEMOLISH TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS ON TWO ADJOINING LOTS AND CONSTRUCT TEN RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT 947 GENESEE AVENUE AND 944
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: INTENSIFICATION OF USE FROM RESTAURANT WITH OUTDOOR DINING TO A BAR WITH LIVE ENTERTAINMENT (ROCCO S TAVERN). ADDRESS: INITIATED BY: 8900 SANTA
More informationCITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT:
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT: INITIATED BY: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO EXPAND AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITHIN THE EXISTING LOBBY AND ROOFTOP AREA WITH
More informationCITY OF SIGNAL HILL SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING THE COURTYARD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 10 CONDOMINIUMS AND A NEW SPECIFIC PLAN
CITY OF SIGNAL HILL 2175 Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA 90755-3799 AGENDA ITEM TO: FROM: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SELENA ALANIS ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING THE
More informationThe demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.
D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t 2072 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW For Committee Discussion/ Majority Recommendation JULY 20, 2017 Design Review #DRCP2016-0002
More informationStaff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 16, 2018 SUBJECT: INITIATED BY: MULTI-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS: AMEND MINIMUM DENSITY REQUIREMENTS FOR R3 AND R4 DISTRICTS; AMEND THE DENSITY BONUS
More informationDEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1
2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1 This Chapter presents the development standards for residential projects. Section 2.1 discusses
More informationAppendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017
Appendix1,Page1 Urban Design Guidelines DRAFT September 2017 Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses Appendix1,Page2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Urban Design Objectives 1 1.3 Building
More informationWALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.
WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Attachment 3 AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b. ORIGINATED BY: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING PROJECT NAME APPLICATION TYPE APPLICATION
More informationComposition of traditional residential corridors.
Page 1 of 7 St. Petersburg, Florida, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - ST. PETERSBURG CITY CODE >> Chapter 16 - LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS >> SECTION 16.20.060. CORRIDOR RESIDENTIAL TRADITIONAL DISTRICTS
More informationPlanning Commission Report
cjly City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (370) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 28, 2016 Subject: Project
More information2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.
DRAFT February 11, 2009 BMC 20.28 Infill Housing 20.28.010 Purpose. This chapter establishes special development regulations for a series of housing forms that are different than the traditional detached
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT AND ZONE MAP AMENDMENT IMPLEMENTING R3C-C ZONING DISTRICT IDENTIFIED IN THE WEST HOLLYWOOD GENERAL PLAN 2035 AND ANALYSIS
More informationSELLWOOD MORELAND IMPROVEMENT LEAGUE 8210 SE 13th AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR STATION CHURCH
SELLWOOD MORELAND IMPROVEMENT LEAGUE 8210 SE 13th AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR 97202 STATION 503-234-3570 CHURCH 503-233-1497 May 10, 2017 Dear Mr. Graves: The Sellwood-Moreland Improvement League (SMILE) is providing
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
106 William Avenue PC Meeting: 8/26/14 Agenda Item: 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: August 26, 2014 RE: DR/FAR 14-26, Geoffrey Butler, Applicant; House Properties 77 LLP, Property Owner; 106 William
More informationBEVERLY HILLS. Planning Commission Report
BEVERLY HILLS Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (510) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: Subject: Recommendation: December
More informationCITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES Development Services Department Planning and Permitting Adopted August 15, 2005 SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME GUIDELINES A. Purpose and Applicability.
More informationPlanning Commission Report
City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: Subject: Project Applicant: February
More informationCity of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.2
Placerville, a Unique Historical Past Forging into a Golden Future City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.2 MEETING DATE: APPLICATION & NO: 996 Thompson Way - Site Plan Review 2015-07
More informationA DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D
Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION AUGUST 14, 2008 2421 Ninth Street Use Permit 05-10000084 to construct a two-story 1,766 sq. ft., detached dwelling unit at the
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Report For the Meeting of February 27, 2019
Advisory Design Panel Report For the Meeting of February 27, 2019 To: Advisory Design Panel Date: February 15, 2019 From: Subject: Moira Wilson, Senior Planner - Urban Design 952 Johnson Street and 1400
More informationGoal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.
Introduction This document summarizes the proposed new zoning for the area of roughly bordered by University Boulevard, Steele Street, 3rd Avenue, and 1st Avenue. It provides a high-level review of the
More informationChapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS
Chapter 20.14 Sections: 20.14.010 Purpose of the Downtown Zoning Districts 20.14.020 Land Use Regulations for Downtown Zoning Districts 20.14.030 Development Standards for Downtown Zoning Districts 20.14.010
More informationA G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR September 2, 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 10:00 a.m. Members of the public who wish to discuss an item should fill out a speaker identification
More informationUrban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London
Urban Design Brief 1635 (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London Site Plan Control Application Holding Provision Application April 1, 2015 Prepared for: Rise Real
More information4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE PROJECTS This chapter presents standards for residential mixed-use projects in the Ashland-Cherryland Business District and the Castro Valley Central Business
More informationEXHIBIT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTED AREA VARIANCES REDEVELOPMENT OF 201 ELLICOTT STREET
EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTED AREA VARIANCES REDEVELOPMENT OF 201 ELLICOTT STREET I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ciminelli Real Estate Corporation (the Applicant ) is seeking area
More informationMulti-unit residential uses code
9.3.11 Multi-unit residential uses code 9.3.11.1 Application (1) This code applies to assessable development identified as requiring assessment against the Multi-unit residential uses code by the tables
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. Proposed Five-Story, 50-Unit Multiple-Family Building at 4856 El Camino Real
Meeting Date: September 20, 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Subject: Prepared by: Initiated by: Zachary Dahl, Planning Services Manager Applicant and Owner Mircea Voskerician, LuxOne LLC Attachments:
More informationA. Land Use Designations: General Plan: Single-Family Residential Zoning: R-1H, Single-Family Residential, Hillside District
Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION SEPTEMBER 9, 2010 2956 Shasta Road Appeal of the Zoning Officer s decision to approve Administrative Use Permit #09-20000088
More informationPD No. 15 Authorized Hearing
PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Community Meeting No. 2 February 19, 2019 6:30 p.m. Hyer Elementary School Cafetorium 8385 Durham St Andrew Ruegg Senior Planner PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing On September 7,
More informationA G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR December 13, 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 3:00 p.m. Members of the public who wish to discuss an item should fill out a speaker identification
More informationWe contacted all RNOs in the area to come to their meetings and personally explain the draft, and take questions. Four RNOs took us up on the offer,
1 2 3 At the last TTF meeting at the end of April, the TTF reached a consensus recommendation on the draft zoning and directed staff to put it out in a draft for public review and feedback. I m going to
More informationArticle 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT this page left intentionally blank Contents ARTICLE 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DIVISION 3.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DESCRIPTION...3.1-1 Section 3.1.1
More informationEmerald Parc Filbert Street Oakland, California THIS PDF IS NOT SIZED FOR PRINT
Emerald Parc 2400 Filbert Street Oakland, California Sausalito Berkeley Oakland San Francisco Alameda PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is to demolish the existing industrial warehouse building and construct
More informationSTAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017
Meeting Date: April 25, 2017 Agency: City of Belmont Staff Contact: Damon DiDonato, Community Development Department, (650) 637-2908; ddidonato@belmont.gov Agenda Title: Amendments to Sections 24 (Secondary
More informationPlanning Commission Report
çbevrlyrly City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310)285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Meeting Date: Subject: Project Applicant: Recommendation: 705 NORTH
More informationA. Land Use Designations: General Plan: LDR Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1H Single Family Residential - Hillside Overlay
Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION FEBRUARY 26, 2015 1229 Oxford Street Use Permit #UP2014-0009 to 1) add a 1,171 square-foot third story which would result
More informationMEMORANDUM. Mr. Sean Tabibian, Esq. Dana A. Sayles, AICP, three6ixty Olivia Joncich, three6ixty. DATE May 26, 2017
MEMORANDUM TO FROM Dana A. Sayles, AICP, three6ixty Olivia Joncich, three6ixty DATE VIA Email RE 3409 W. Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90026 Zoning Analysis and Entitlement Strategy three6ixty (the Consultant
More informationRM2 Low Density Row Housing RM3 Low Density Multiple Housing
REPORT TO COUNCIL Date: May 30, 2017 RIM No. 0940-40 To: From: City Manager Community Planning Department (LK) Application: DP16-0014 & DVP16-0144 Owner: RA Quality Homes Ltd., INC. No.BC0647947 & 1052192
More informationPlanning Commission Report
Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: September 27, 2012 Subject: 366 North Rodeo
More informationCITY OF BUENA PARK MINUTES OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING March 2, 2016
716 CITY OF BUENA PARK MINUTES OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING The Zoning Administrator convened the meeting at 3:00 p.m. on, in the Community Development Conference Room, City of Buena Park Civic Center,
More informationLINVILL, C P PINK, D A EDWARDS, B P MITCHELL, L P KAHN, C P JENSON, K P CLARKE, T P
Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division ACTION SUMMARY FOR DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING September 21, 2017 7:00 PM LINVILL, C P PINK, D A EDWARDS, B P MITCHELL, L P KAHN, C P
More informationPlan ning Commission Report
çbevrlyrly Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 235-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Plan ning Commission Report Meeting Date: June 11, 2015 Subject: 603 North
More informationZoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) Detached Accessory Dwellings
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Housing Division 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, VA 22201 TEL: 703-228-3765 FAX: 703-228-3834 www.arlingtonva.us Memorandum To:
More informationPlanning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 8862)
Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 8862) Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 2/14/2018 Summary Title: Title: From: Affordable Housing (AH) Combining District Draft Ordinance PUBLIC
More informationThe Cannery Marketplace Narrative. Purpose: Site Design Approach: Cannery Commerce District 10/18/2017
The Cannery Marketplace Narrative Cannery Commerce District 10/18/2017 Purpose: A number of entitlements are being requested for the Cannery Marketplace inclusive of a Master Conditional Use Permit (Master
More informationARTICLE 5. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DISTRICTS 5.1 PURPOSE STATEMENTS 5.2 USES 5.3 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.4 DESIGN STANDARDS 5.5 DK DISTRICT STANDARDS 5
ARTICLE 5. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DISTRICTS 5.1 PURPOSE STATEMENTS 5.2 USES 5.3 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.4 DESIGN STANDARDS 5.5 DK DISTRICT STANDARDS 5.6 CU DISTRICT STANDARDS 5.7 SW DISTRICT STANDARDS THE
More informationCOUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: October 20, 2016 TO: FROM: Zoning Hearing Officer Planning Staff SUBJECT: Consideration of a Non-Conforming Use Permit, pursuant to Sections 6135
More informationARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT
ARTICLE FIVE 021218 FINAL DRAFT Sec. 503.6 Open Space Preservation Option Open Space Preservation Option Open Space Preservation developments may be approved in the AR, R-1, R-2 and R-3 zoning districts,
More information739 Channing Way PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW
739 Channing Way PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t For Majority Recommendations SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 Design Review #DRCP2017-0005 to construct two
More informationP.C. RESOLUTION NO
EXHIBIT A P.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2012-523 REQUEST FOR A MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. DEV-007-003 (APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 28, 2009) TO CONSTRUCT A 25 -HIGH, 500 SQUARE- FOOT, SECOND-FLOOR
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item
PDP-13-00518 Item No. 3B- 1 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item PC Staff Report 2/24/14 ITEM NO. 3B PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HERE @ KANSAS; 1101 INDIANA ST (SLD) PDP-13-00518:
More informationHILLS BEVERLY. Planning Commission Report. City of Beverly Hills
BEVERLY HILLS 1 City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL, (310) 4854141 FAX. (310) 8584966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: February 14, 2013 Subject:
More informationMINOR VARIANCE REQUESTED:
November 6 th, 2016 Committee of Adjustment 101 Centrepointe Dr. Ottawa, ON K2G 5K7 Re: 83 Hinton Avenue Ave. Applications for Minor Variances APPLICATION OVERVIEW The applicant proposes to construct a
More informationAccessory Coach House
Updated July 2018 Accessory Coach House Development Permit Guidelines 1 Accessory Coach House Development Permit Guidelines Zoning Bylaw, 1995 DIVISION VII C. Contents Part I General Reglations 1 Introduction
More informationCity of Brea PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION
Agenda Item 9. City of Brea PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION TO: FROM: Honorable Chair and Planning Commission Jennifer A. Lilley, AICP, City Planner DATE: 06/27/2017 SUBJECT: PRECISE DEVELOPMENT NO.
More informationORDINANCE NO. _ _
ORDINANCE NO. _2008-08-1385_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 08-07, A REQUEST TO AMEND CHAPTER 20.41, SP-7, SPECIAL PURPOSE
More informationpublished by title and summary as permitted by Section 508 of the Charter. The approved "Summary
Introduced by: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASADENA AMENDING TITLE 17 (THE ZONING CODE) TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (RM-16,32 AND 48; CITY
More informationArticle Optional Method Requirements
Article 59-6. Optional Method Requirements [DIV. 6.1. MPDU DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ZONES Sec. 6.1.1. General Requirements... 6 2 Sec. 6.1.2. General Site and Building Type Mix...
More informationCity of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.1
Placerville, a Unique Historical Past Forging into a Golden Future City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.1 MEETING DATE: APPLICATION & NO.: 994 Thompson Way - Site Plan Review 2015-06
More informationCity of Placerville Planning Commission STAFF REPORT
Placerville, a Unique Historical Past Forging into a Golden Future City of Placerville STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Consideration of a request to operate the automobile brokerage business in the Highway Commercial
More informationLITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY
LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY JANUARY 2013 CONTENTS 1.0 INTENT & PRINCIPLES...1 2.0 APPLICATION...2 3.0 HOUSING TYPES, HEIGHT & DENSITY POLICIES...3 3.1 LOW TO MID-RISE APARTMENT POLICIES...4
More informationH4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone
H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone H4.1. Zone description The Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone is the most widespread residential zone covering many established suburbs and some greenfields
More informationPD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11
PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11 January 7, 2019 Andrew Ruegg, Senior Planner Sustainable Development and Construction City of Dallas Staff Recommendation Steering committee
More informationCity of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 15, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Council Paul Benoit, City Administrator Consideration of the 2 nd Reading of Ordinance 731 N.S. - Amending Division
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- A RESOLUTION OF THE MARIN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DENYING THE PETER PAPPAS APPEAL AND SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION S ACTION BY DENYING THE PAPPAS DESIGN REVIEW CLEARANCE
More informationTOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 11, 2018 Staff Report to the Planning Commission
ITEM #3.2 TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the Planning Commission SUBJECT: FROM: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS FOR A NEW 2,831 SQUARE FOOT, TWO
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meeting Date: January 10, 2019 Item #: PZ2019-393 Project Name: Applicant and Owner: Proposed Development: Requests: STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI Dresden Heights Phase
More informationCover Letter with Narrative Statement
Cover Letter with Narrative Statement March 31, 2017 rev July 27, 2017 RE: Rushton Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development Application for Public Hearing for RPUD Rezone PL2015 000 0306 Mr. Eric Johnson,
More informationARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS
ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS RZC 21.08 RESIDENTIAL REGULATIONS 21.08.290 Cottage Housing Developments A. Purpose. The purpose of the cottage housing requirements is to: 1. Provide a housing type that
More informationMEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres
Department of Community Planning & Economic Development 250 South 4th Street, Room 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415-1385 MEMORANDUM To: City Planning Commission, Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Peter Crandall,
More information10.2 ALBION AREA PLAN
10.2 ALBION AREA PLAN Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 7060-2014 Chapter 10, Page 5 10.2 ALBION AREA PLAN The following policies are adopted to guide development within the Albion urban area.
More informationARTICLE OPTIONAL METHOD REGULATIONS
ARTICLE 59-6. OPTIONAL METHOD REGULATIONS DIV. 6.1. MPDU DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ZONES SEC. 6.1.1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS... 6 2 SEC. 6.1.2. GENERAL SITE AND BUILDING T PE MIX...
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ARB Meeting Date: July 3, 2018 Item #: _PZ2018-293_ THE PARK AT 5 TH Request: Site Address: Project Name: Parcel Number: Applicant: Proposed Development: Current Zoning:
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: January 11, 2018 Item #: PZ2017-151 STAFF REPORT VARIANCES RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH Request: Multiple Variances for a new restaurant with drive-through
More informationSecondary Suites Design Standards & Guidelines for houses built after July 1998
Secondary Suites Design Standards & Guidelines for houses built after July 1998 Overview This information outlines design elements you will need to include in your secondary suite, for houses built after
More informationTRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION
TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION March 2018- FINAL DRAFT SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS This report
More informationAMENDED ZONING BY-LAW ARTICLE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY
AMENDED ZONING BY-LAW ARTICLE 13.5 - SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY ARTICLE : To see if the Town will vote to amend the Zoning Bylaw as follows: 2. By deleting existing Section 13.5, Senior Living Community,
More informationSTAFF REPORT. September 25, City Council. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division
STAFF REPORT September 25, 2006 To: From: Subject: City Council Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division Request for Directions Report Toronto & East York Community Council, Report
More informationAGENDA SLOT HOME EVALUATION & TEXT AMENDMENT. 5:30 - Welcome
AGENDA 5:30 - Welcome Please sign-in, put a sticker on the map, grab snacks, materials and a seat 5:45 - Staff Presentation 6:15 - Open House Stations Background Information Mixed Use Districts Multi Unit
More informationORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the zoning map.
ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section 12.04 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code by amending the zoning map. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section. Section 12.04 of the
More informationPublic Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment
Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment The proposed amendments to the Denver Zoning Code have been informed by the Slot Home Strategy Report. This document has been developed out of a robust process
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2012 DATE: June 7, 2012 SUBJECT: SP #397 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to revise condition #31 to modify the retail transparency requirement
More informationPlanning Commission Report
çbe~rly Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: March 13, 2014 Subject: 9521 Sunset
More informationA APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES
A : A.1 Introduction Form-based prototypes are specific building types that are either encouraged or discouraged in historic multi-family residential or mixed-use neighborhoods. Their intent is to ensure
More informationH5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone
H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone [ENV-2016-AKL-000197: Robert Adams] Addition sought H5.1. Zone description The Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone is a reasonably high-intensity zone enabling
More informationBunker Hill Part II Urban Design. Specific Plan. Case No. CPC SP TABLE OF CONTENTS
Bunker Hill Part II Urban Design Specific Plan Case No. CPC-2011-684-SP TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section 9. Section 10.
More informationResidential roof decks. Residential Roof Decks
Residential roof decks San Francisco Magazine cover Feb 2018 Issue Roof Decks and Discretionary Reviews Increasing number of cases / amount of time spent on Discretionary Reviews on projects involving
More information. \. structure. portion of a. yard setback. in height. for that. above 45 ft. structure above. 20-ft. front. 2, additional.
Z089-254(RB) E-1 REGULATIONS Front Yard YARD, LOT, AND SPACE 00. \.,, Max.-6Oft. Mm. 15 ft. maximum front yard right-of-ways other way is dedicated existing Ft. Worth ft. from Ft. Worth Ave. or rights
More informationAccessory Dwelling Unit Permit
PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 411 Main Street (530) 87-6800 P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 527 Application No. APPLICATION FOR Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit Applicant Information Applicant Street Address Daytime
More informationArchitectural Review Board Report
Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Cc: Subject: Architectural Review Board Meeting: June 19, 2017 Agenda Item: 7.3 Architectural Review Board Gina Szilak, Associate Planner Stephanie Reich, AIA,
More informationMONTEREY COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT COASTAL OFFICE, 2620 1 ST AVENUE, MARINA, CA 93933 (831) 883-7500, main line / (831) 384-3261, facsimile SCOTT HENNESSY, DIRECTOR MONTEREY COUNTY
More information(John Keho, AICP, Interim Director, COD (David DeGrazia, Planning Manager, CH ) ~~ (Jennifer Alkire, AICP, Senior Planner, C PP) JA
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 19, 2018 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: REQUEST TO DESIGNATE AN EXISTING 5,250 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING AS A LOCAL CULTURAL RESOURCE, ENTER INTO A MILLS ACT CONTRACT FOR
More informationSUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard
Page 1 of Report PB-100-16 SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard TO: FROM: Development and Infrastructure Committee Planning and Building Department
More informationCITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS
67 68 CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO. 5-1-2796 A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS The Municipal Council of the City of Kamloops, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows: 1. This
More informationGeneral Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services
POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING Report Date: August 31, 2016 Contact: Anita Molaro Contact No.: 604.871.6489 RTS No.: 11651 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20 Meeting Date: October 18, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT:
More informationVILLAGE CENTER ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA ADVISORY WORKING GROUP/ PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ORR PARTNERS 01/
VILLAGE CENTER ADVISORY WORKING GROUP/ PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ORR PARTNERS 01/21 PROJECT BACKGROUND 01 PAGE 02 01. PROJECT BACKGROUND 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE 1 STREET VIEW 2 2 STREET VIEW PAGE 03 01.
More informationAgenda Report TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: NOVEMBER 20,2006
Agenda Report TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: NOVEMBER 20,2006 FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN, FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RECOMMENDATION
More informationRT-5 and RT-5N Districts Schedule
Districts Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this District Schedule is to strongly encourage the retention and renovation of existing character houses by providing incentives such as increased floor area,
More information