A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: Single-Family Residential Zoning: R-1H, Single-Family Residential, Hillside District

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: Single-Family Residential Zoning: R-1H, Single-Family Residential, Hillside District"

Transcription

1 Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION SEPTEMBER 9, Shasta Road Appeal of the Zoning Officer s decision to approve Administrative Use Permit # to construct a two-story addition to an existing single-family residence, comprising 313 square feet of living space on the main living level and 338 square feet of garage space as a new lower level, with an average height of 16 feet and a maximum height of 21 feet, and with a side yard setback of 3 feet and a front yard setback of 8 feet. I. Application Basics A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: Single-Family Residential Zoning: R-1H, Single-Family Residential, Hillside District B. Zoning Permits Required: Administrative Use Permit to construct a residential addition greater than 14 feet in average height under BMC Section 23D C; and Administrative Use Permit to construct a residential addition greater than 14 feet in average height and a residential addition greater than 20 feet in maximum height under BMC Section 23E B; and Administrative Use Permit to reduce the side yard setback from 4 feet to 3 feet and reduce the front yard setback from 20 feet to 8 feet at the location of the addition under BMC Section 23D B; and Administrative Use Permit to reduce the side yard setback from 4 feet to 3 feet and reduce the front yard setback from 20 feet to 8 feet at the location of the addition under BMC Section 23E C. C. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section of the CEQA Guidelines ( Existing Facilities ) Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA Tel: TDD: Fax: zab@ci.berkeley.ca.us

2 2956 SHASTA ROAD ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD Page 2 of 14 September 9, 2010 D. Parties Involved: Applicant / Owners: James and Heather O'Brien, 2956 Shasta Road, Berkeley Appellant: David Lee and Irene Moore, 2958 Shasta Road, Berkeley Other Parties: David Jackovich, 2961 Shasta Road, Berkeley Stefania Pandolfo, 2954 Shasta Road, Berkeley

3 ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD 2956 SHASTA ROAD September 9, 2010 Page 3 of 14 Figure 1: Vicinity Map

4 2956 SHASTA ROAD ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD Page 4 of 14 September 9, 2010 Figure 2: Site Plan

5 ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD 2956 SHASTA ROAD September 9, 2010 Page 5 of 14 Table 1: Land Use Information Location Existing Use Zoning District General Plan Designation Subject Property Single-family residence R-1H Single-Family Residential Surrounding Properties North Single-family residence R-1H Single-Family Residential South Single-family residence R-1H Single-Family Residential East Single-family residence R-1H Single-Family Residential West Single-family residence R-1H Single-Family Residential Table 2: Special Characteristics Characteristic Applies to Project? Explanation Creeks No No creek is mapped near the project site Oak Trees No No oak trees would be affected by the project Seismic Hazards No The project is within a potential landslide zone under the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act, but is exempt as a wood framed single-family residence with two or fewer stories Green Building Score N/A The small addition does not require green building review Table 3: Project Chronology Date June 29, 2009 June 23, 2010 June 24, 2010 July 11, 2010 July 14, 2010 August 11, 2010 August 19, 2010 August 26, 2010 September 3, 2010 September 9, 2010 August 23, 2010 Action Application submitted Application deemed complete Zoning Officer's Notice of Decision mailed Mediation session conducted with applicant and neighbor at 2958 Shasta Appeal filed by David Lee and Irene Moore, 2958 Shasta Alternative plans agreed to by applicant and appellant Concerns raised by other neighbors regarding revised plans Zoning Adjustments Board hearing notices mailed/posted Mediation session conducted with all concerned neighbors ZAB hearing on appeal PSA deadline Project must be approved or denied within 60 days after being determined to be exempt from CEQA, or 60 days after adoption of a negative declaration, or 180 days after adoption of an EIR (Govt. Code Section 65950).

6 2956 SHASTA ROAD ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD Page 6 of 14 September 9, 2010 Table 4A: Development Standards and Original Project Parameters Standard R1-H District BMC Sections 23D and 23E.96 Existing Addition / Reduction Proposed Total Permitted / Required Lot Area (sq. ft.) 4,989 N/A 4,989 5,000 Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.) 1, ,149 N/A Dwelling Units Building Height Building Setbacks Total ADU Average * 28, addition over 14 req. AUP Maximum * 35, addition over 20 req. AUP Stories Front 33' 8" at addition - 25' 8" 8'* 20' Rear 9' 7" N/A 9' 7" 20' Left Side 3' 7" -7" 3'* 4' Right Side 5' 7" N/A 5' 7" 4' Lot Coverage (%) Usable Open Space (sq. ft.) 800+ N/A Parking * Requires AUP 0 (garage converted to storage with false floor) 1 1 1

7 ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD 2956 SHASTA ROAD September 9, 2010 Page 7 of 14 Table 4B: Development Standards and Revised Project Parameters Standard R1-H District BMC Sections 22D and 23E.96 Existing Addition / Reduction Proposed Total Permitted / Required Lot Area (sq. ft.) 4,989 N/A 4,989 5,000 Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.) 1, ,317 N/A Dwelling Units Building Height Building Setbacks Total ADU Average * 28, addition over 14 req. AUP Maximum * 35, addition over 20 req. AUP Stories Front 32' 4" at addition - 24' 4" 8'* 20' Rear 9' 7" N/A 9' 7" 20' Left Side 3' 7" -- 3' 7" 4' Right Side 5' 7" -- 5' 7" 4' Lot Coverage (%) Usable Open Space (sq. ft.) 800+ N/A Parking * Requires AUP 0 (garage converted to storage with false floor) II. Project Setting A. Neighborhood / Area Description: The project is located in a hillside neighborhood of generally modest one and twostory homes along the top section of Shasta Road, one block below Grizzly Peak Blvd. The area is developed with mature trees such that many homes have filtered views toward the west. Many homes are developed with garages close to the street due to the slope of the land, with homes above or below the garage depending on the uphill or downhill location of the lot relative to the street. Lots are generally small, and homes step with the street slope such that neighbors are generally at slightly different elevations from side to side with retaining walls along side property lines.

8 2956 SHASTA ROAD ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD Page 8 of 14 September 9, 2010 B. Site Conditions: The site is an uphill lot, i.e. the lot slopes up from the street, with a steep driveway leading to a one-car garage (now converted to a storage area with a false floor) and stairs leading to a front porch that serves the one-story dwelling. The dwelling is a three-bedroom, one-bath house constructed in the 1940s. A family room was added at the rear of the dwelling in 1949 and expanded slightly in It appears that since that time, the garage has been converted to a laundry room and storage area. Parking is provided in the driveway and along the street frontage. There are hedges along the side property lines in the front and side yards, and a large tree in the front yard. A low brick wall separates the front yard from the parking area along the street, and low retaining walls are present in the side and rear yard. The main floor of the house presently sits about nine feet above the street. III. Project Description A. Original Proposal: The applicant, who is the resident and owner, proposes to construct a two-story addition at the front of the existing residence in the location of the present garage and driveway on the north side of the lot (see approved plans in Attachment 1, as described in Table 4A above). It would include a total of 651 square feet of new floor area, including a master bedroom and bathroom on the main floor (approximately 313 square feet) and a new garage on a new lower level (approximately 338 square feet). The addition would have a low slope hip roof, wood siding, and divided lite windows to match the existing residence. The garage would project toward the street with a secondary hip roof at a lower level, stepping down toward the street. The second story would be set back approximately 17 feet from the street, and the one-car garage would be set back 8 feet from the street. The side setback would be reduced from 3 feet 7 inches to 3 feet due to the angle of the house relative to the side lot line. Two uncovered parking spaces would remain available along the street frontage. B. Revised Proposal: Based on the appeal filed by the neighbor to the north, as described more fully below, the applicant has prepared a revised project that would shift the addition from the north side of the lot to the south side. This approach, shown in Attachment 2 and described in Table 4B above, would extend the front of the house from an existing pair of bedrooms, resulting in a slightly larger project because the master bedroom and bathroom would be wider to match the existing house. Interior stairs would be provided to the garage and additional storage space would be provided in the garage level. In all, the revised addition would include 814 square feet of new floor area. The revised addition would also be slightly taller than the original project because the lot has a slight cross-slope. However, the revised project would be setback further from the nearest neighbor to the south, 6 feet to the southern property line instead of the original 3 feet from the north. The existing brick wall along this frontage would be removed to provide for a new driveway, and the existing driveway would be removed and landscaped.

9 ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD 2956 SHASTA ROAD September 9, 2010 Page 9 of 14 IV. Community Discussion A. Neighbor/Community Concerns: The neighbors to the immediate north, David Lee and Irene Moore at 2958 Shasta Road, expressed concerns about the project during the initial staff review and during subsequent conversations, site visits, and in writing. Concerns related primarily to a view that is available from a bedroom window towards the Oakland waterfront and SF Bay that would be blocked by the addition. In response, staff required the applicant to provide detailed plans including a site survey, make revisions to the plans, and install story poles. Based on this information, the neighbors continued to believe that the impact would be detrimental to their view, light, and shadows. These neighbors filed the present appeal. Mediation was conducted and revisions were negotiated subsequent to the Zoning Officer's approval that would satisfy the appellant. The revised project would shift the proposed addition to the south. This revision is also represented in story poles installed at the property. In response to this revision, the neighbors to the immediate south, Stefania Pandolfo at 2954 Shasta Road, and across the street, David Jackovich at 2961 Shasta Road, have expressed concern about views, light and privacy. Staff response to these concerns is provided below. A mediation session with all of the concerned neighbors is scheduled as of the writing of this report. The applicant has requested that the ZAB conduct a hearing to consider all of the concerns and options, and to provide direction if compromise is not reached with every party. See Attachment 5 for correspondence received. B. Committee Review: No committee review is required. V. Issues and Analysis A. Zoning Officer Decision: The Zoning Officer's Notice of Decision of June 24, 2010, to approve the original project included the following findings, as more fully stated in Attachment 1: 1. The original project will not be detrimental because: The project would provide a reasonable addition to the existing residence that conforms to the average and maximum height limits for the District, extends an existing building wall along the side yard, and provides a replacement parking space within a garage.

10 2956 SHASTA ROAD ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD Page 10 of 14 September 9, 2010 The project would step with the slope of the site, keeping the roof line below the existing roof of the house and stepping towards the street, with a front setback similar to those of other houses in the vicinity. The addition would be lower than the immediately adjacent residence and would not cast shadows or block significant views or light. 2. The original project would satisfy all other standards of the Ordinance, and would not unreasonably obstruct sunlight, air or views because: The addition is lower than the existing roof line of the house, would step with the terrain, and would be below the height of the immediately adjacent residence. The addition would not block sunlight to the bedroom window of the residence to the north, the only living area that would be affected by the project, as the eave line is below the height of the window and the roof would have a low slope that would not block sunlight. The addition would not block air flow to the bedroom of the residence to the north, as it is set back from the property line, the eave line is below the adjacent window and the roof would have a low slope that would allow air flow. The addition would not unreasonably obstruct significant views because the only view that could be affected is from the adjacent bedroom window, which does not qualify as a significant view (significant view of the Berkeley Hills, San Francisco Bay, Mt. Tamalpais, or a significant landmark such as the Campanile, Golden Gate Bridge, and Alcatraz Island or any other significant vista that substantially enhances the value and enjoyment of real property). The view that would be affected is an angled and filtered view of the Port of Oakland and environs, which is not a significant view as defined and does not substantially enhance the value or enjoyment of the property to the degree that it is not in primary living space or prominent in the use of the bedroom. 3. The original project would be consistent with the purposes of the H District, in that it would: Implement the General Plan policies regarding Hillside Development, i.e. i. Policy UD-17, Design Elements, In relating new design to the surrounding area, the factors to consider should include height, massing, materials, color and detailing or ornament because the addition will be of the same scale, materials, color and height as the existing residence. ii. Policy UD-24, Area Character, Regulate new construction and alterations to ensure that they are truly compatible with and, where feasible, reinforce the desirable design characteristics of the particular area they are in because the addition will be similar to other residences in the area by using a similar design strategy in stepping, using similar materials, and minimizing grading or contrast with the setting.

11 ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD 2956 SHASTA ROAD September 9, 2010 Page 11 of 14 iii. iv. Policy UD-31, Views, Construction should avoid blocking significant views, especially ones toward the Bay, the hills, and significant landmarks such as the Campanile, Golden Gate Bridge, and Alcatraz Island because the only view that could be affected is from the adjacent bedroom window, which does not qualify as a significant view (significant view of the Berkeley Hills, San Francisco Bay, Mt. Tamalpais, or a significant landmark such as the Campanile, Golden Gate Bridge, and Alcatraz Island or any other significant vista that substantially enhances the value and enjoyment of real property). The view that would be affected is an angled and filtered view of the Port of Oakland and environs, which is not a significant view as defined and does not substantially enhance the value or enjoyment of the property to the degree that it is not in primary living space or prominent in the use of the bedroom. Policy UD-32, Shadows, New buildings should be designed to minimize impacts on solar access and minimize detrimental shadows because the addition would not block sunlight to the bedroom window of the residence to the north, the only living area that would be affected by the project, as the eave line is below the height of the window and the roof would have a low slope that would not block sunlight. Protect the character of Berkeley s hill Districts and their immediate environs, because: the residential addition would be lower than the existing roof line of the house, would be of similar form and use similar materials of the existing house and neighborhood, and be consistent with the setbacks and configurations of other homes in the immediate area that have downslope to the street and garages close to the street. No trees would be removed, no major grading would occur, and the street frontage improvements would remain the same. Give reasonable protection to views yet allow appropriate development of all property, because: the residential addition would be lower than the existing roof line of the house and would not project more than two feet beyond the front of the adjacent house to the north, thereby preserving views from the front of the adjacent house, while allowing a reasonable addition of 313 square feet for a master bedroom on the main floor and 338 square feet for the lower garage level, for a total living area of 1,664 square feet on a single level with a lot coverage of under 40%. Allow modifications in standard yard and height requirements when justified because of steep topography, irregular lot pattern, unusual street conditions, or other special aspects of the Hillside District area, because: the site is steeply sloping up from the street, necessitating the provision of a new garage and driveway apron that is more easily accessible from the street and below the existing residential living floor. The new construction

12 2956 SHASTA ROAD ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD Page 12 of 14 September 9, 2010 is aligned with the existing north wall of the residence and steps with the slope of the site, on a small lot that cannot easily accommodate additional living space or garage on other parts of the lot. The front setback would be consistent with others in the immediate area. B. Key Issues: 1. Appeal Issue: Views and Property Value The appellants are concerned that the addition would block the existing filtered view to the south, toward the Port of Oakland and Bay, from the bedroom window on the side of the house. This view would be blocked by the roof of the addition, which would extend forward to roughly the same setback as the appellants residence. The appellants provide an opinion from an appraiser that indicates a possible 2% diminution in value due to the loss of the view, or about $15,000. Staff Response: The view from the appellants front bedroom was observed by staff and considered in the Zoning Officer s decision, as stated above. While the appraiser indicates that there could be a diminution in value, such changes to the setting of the property are consistent with the development in the area where houses are close together and trees and buildings screen or block views. The existing view is oblique and screened, and does not have a prominent focus such as of the Golden Gate Bridge. Revised Proposal: The view from the appellants front bedroom would be unaffected by the revised project design because the addition would be located over 25 feet from the window and set back to preserve the view from the residence at 2958 Shasta Road. The revised project would not interfere with any other view from any other residence. 2. Appeal Issue: Shadows / Light / Air The appellants are concerned that the addition would cast shadows and interfere with the light available to the bedroom that is located along the south side of the residence adjacent to the proposed addition, and believe that a shadow study should be completed. Light would remain available to the bedroom at all hours of the day. Staff Response: The potential shadow impacts of the addition were considered as part of the Zoning Officer s decision, as stated above. A shadow study is unnecessary to demonstrate that the project would not cast a shadow on any windows given the relative building elevations and setbacks. Revised Proposal: The revised project would have no shadow impacts to the residence at 2958 Shasta Road, and would not cast shadows on any other residence. Light also would remain available to all other windows of other neighbors, as the immediate neighbor at 2954 Shasta Road has windows that

13 ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD 2956 SHASTA ROAD September 9, 2010 Page 13 of 14 face north towards the project, shielded by a tall hedge and large tree, and the revised project would locate the addition at least 10 feet from those windows. 3. Issue: Neighborhood Character The appellants are concerned that the proposed project would be out of scale with the neighborhood, particularly because the addition would be close to the side property line, in addition to being close to the front property line. Staff Response: The project was evaluated for consistency with the neighborhood, as presented in the Zoning Officer s decision and summarized above. While staff initially had concerns about the project, those concerns were resolved during the review process based on site visits to the area which showed that this hillside neighborhood is commonly developed in this manner. Revised Proposal: The revised project would remain consistent with the neighborhood character, as it includes a stepped addition that is integrated into the hillside setting. The lower level garage would be close to the street with a low hipped roof leading to a main level master bedroom suite set back further from the street. The low brick wall would remain along a portion of the frontage, a new tree would be planted in the corner of the building to partially screen the addition, and the existing driveway would be removed and landscaped. The setback from the side property line would be greater on the south side with this alternative than on the north side with the original proposal, further reducing potential impacts. 4. Issue: Alternative Options The appellants are concerned that insufficient consideration was given to alternative plans that would reduce impacts to their views, light, and other concerns. The appellants provided a suggested alternative that would place the addition on the south side of the property. That alternative concept has been more fully developed by the applicant and is now being proposed as an option. However, that option has raised concerns of other neighbors; all parties are attending a mediation session on September 3, 2010 to discuss the issues and possible solutions. Staff Response: Staff initially suggested that the applicant could consider alternatives, and worked with the applicant to explore those options. The applicant provided reasons why other options were less feasible; staff therefore worked with the applicant to make some minor changes to the plans. Because the project was found to be acceptable, it was approved as revised. Revised Proposal: Staff agrees that the alternative location of the addition would reduce potential impacts to the appellants property, and would not impose unreasonable impacts on other neighbors considering the building scale and separation, lack of views, and so forth.

14 2956 SHASTA ROAD ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARD Page 14 of 14 September 9, Issue: Procedural Concerns The appellants note that the city expressed concerns about the project and yet approved it. Staff Response: City staff were concerned about the project and its potential impacts, and considered several issues raised by the neighbors to the north. In the end, staff concluded that the project would not be unreasonable and approved the design. Revised Proposal: The revised proposal has also raised procedural concerns among neighbors, in that the public notices refer to the original project. However, the neighbors have also been able to view the story poles, obtain information about the project, been contacted directly and are in mediation, and therefore have adequate opportunity to review and comment on the original project and revised project. C. General Plan Consistency: General Plan consistency was evaluated in the Zoning Officer's decision, as recited above. The revised project would be similarly consistent. VI. Recommendation Because of the on-going discussion among the parties regarding compromise solutions that could serve to meet everyone s objectives, staff recommends that the Zoning Adjustments Board: Consider the original plans, revised plans, and testimony regarding relative merits and concerns, and continue the hearing with direction. Alternatively, the Board could: Deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Zoning Officer to approve the original project (see Attachment 1), or Approve the modified proposal as presented by the applicant (see plans in Attachment 2) or Approve a modified plan as may be presented based on mediation among the parties. Attachments: 1. Zoning Officer Notice of Decision, including approved Plans and Findings and Conditions, June 24, Revised Project Plans, dated August 20, Appeal of David Lee and Irene Moore, dated July 14, Notice of Public Hearing 5. Correspondence Received Staff Planner: Steven Buckley, sbuckley@ci.berkeley.ca.us, (510)

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: LDR Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1H Single Family Residential - Hillside Overlay

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: LDR Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1H Single Family Residential - Hillside Overlay Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION FEBRUARY 26, 2015 1229 Oxford Street Use Permit #UP2014-0009 to 1) add a 1,171 square-foot third story which would result

More information

Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D

Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION NOVEMBER 8, 2018 59 The Plaza Drive Use Permit #ZP2018-0164 to alter an existing three-story, 6,520 square-foot, single-family

More information

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION AUGUST 14, 2008 2421 Ninth Street Use Permit 05-10000084 to construct a two-story 1,766 sq. ft., detached dwelling unit at the

More information

A DJUSTMENTS. C. Parties Involved: Applicant/Owner Church Divinity School of the Pacific, 2451 Ridge Rd., Berkeley, 94709

A DJUSTMENTS. C. Parties Involved: Applicant/Owner Church Divinity School of the Pacific, 2451 Ridge Rd., Berkeley, 94709 Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION APRIL 10, 2008 2451 Ridge Road Use Permit #04-10000066 to demolish rear portion of existing seminary chapel and construct new chapel

More information

A DJUSTMENTS. C. Parties Involved: Applicant/Owner: Guy Supawit, on the behalf of Wat Mongkolratanaram, 1911 Russell Street, Berkeley CA

A DJUSTMENTS. C. Parties Involved: Applicant/Owner: Guy Supawit, on the behalf of Wat Mongkolratanaram, 1911 Russell Street, Berkeley CA 1911 Russell Street Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION APRIL 24, 2008 Use Permit #07-10000040 to 1) construct a 16 by 24 Buddha Sanctuary and create four off-street

More information

8 Maybeck Twin Drive Use Permit ZP# to construct a new, three-story, 2,557-square-foot single-family dwelling on a vacant lot.

8 Maybeck Twin Drive Use Permit ZP# to construct a new, three-story, 2,557-square-foot single-family dwelling on a vacant lot. Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION FEBRUARY 9, 2017 8 Maybeck Twin Drive Use Permit ZP#2016-0097 to construct a new, three-story, 2,557-square-foot single-family

More information

Rigoberto Calocarivas, Multicultural Institute, 1920 Seventh St., Berkeley, CA 94710

Rigoberto Calocarivas, Multicultural Institute, 1920 Seventh St., Berkeley, CA 94710 Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION JANURARY 26, 2012 1920 Seventh Street Use Permit #11-10000043 to construct a two-story, 452 sq. ft. addition to the south

More information

Use Permit # to establish beer and wine service with meals within an existing quick-service restaurant space.

Use Permit # to establish beer and wine service with meals within an existing quick-service restaurant space. Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION JUNE 10, 2010 2130 Oxford Street Use Permit # 10-10000036 to establish beer and wine service with meals within an existing

More information

Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION MARCH 31, Berkeley Way UC Press Building

Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION MARCH 31, Berkeley Way UC Press Building Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION MARCH 31, 2015 2120 Berkeley Way UC Press Building Use Permit #ZP2015-0153 to renovate an existing three-story, 22,864-

More information

Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR March 10, 2009

Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR March 10, 2009 Page 1 of 64 Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR March 10, 2009 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Phil Kamlarz, City Manager Submitted by: Dan Marks, Director, Planning and

More information

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR June 11, 2013 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, City Manager Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning & Development

More information

D. Applicant: Muhammad A. Nadhiri, Axis Development Group, 580 California Street, 16 th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104

D. Applicant: Muhammad A. Nadhiri, Axis Development Group, 580 California Street, 16 th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104 2701 Shattuck Avenue Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD PREVIEW AUGUST 8, 2013 Use Permit #12-10000039 to construct a 30,079 sq. ft., five story, 60-foot tall,

More information

Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D

Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION JULY 12, 2018 2501-2509 Haste Street/2433 Telegraph Avenue El Jardin Use Permit Modification #ZP2018-0091 to modify approved Use

More information

DECISION AND ORDER APPEARANCES. Decision Issue Date Thursday, March 22, 2018

DECISION AND ORDER APPEARANCES. Decision Issue Date Thursday, March 22, 2018 Court Services 40 Orchard View Blvd Telephone: 416-392-4697 Toronto Local Appeal Body Suite 211 Fax: 416-696-4307 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab DECISION AND

More information

Item 12 April 20, 2016

Item 12 April 20, 2016 Item 12 April 20, 2016 Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division DATE: April 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Members of the Planning Commission Elizabeth Greene, Senior Planner

More information

1935 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

1935 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW D E S I G N 1935 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t For Committee Discussion/ Majority Recommendation APRIL 18, 2013 Design Review #12-30000064

More information

The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.

The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken. D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t 2072 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW For Committee Discussion/ Majority Recommendation JULY 20, 2017 Design Review #DRCP2016-0002

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report cjly City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (370) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 28, 2016 Subject: Project

More information

2109 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way

2109 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION JULY 9, 2009 2109 Martin Luther King, Jr. Way Use Permit #09-10000031 to establish a teen center and administrative offices for

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: Subject: Project Applicant: February

More information

Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D

Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION MARCH 8, 2018 1740 San Pablo Avenue Use Permit #ZP2017-0014, to demolish two existing 1-story buildings at build a 5-story mixed-use

More information

Shattuck Avenue

Shattuck Avenue Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION OCTOBER 22, 2015 2319-2323 Shattuck Avenue ZP2015-0114 to modify Use Permit #06-10000148 to permit the payment of an affordable

More information

A DJUSTMENTS. B. Permits Requested Pursuant to State Density Bonus Law:

A DJUSTMENTS. B. Permits Requested Pursuant to State Density Bonus Law: Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION MARCH 13, 2008 2398 Bancroft Way Use Permit #06-10000140 to demolish student-oriented religious assembly building and construct

More information

- Project Preview - D. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section (In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines.

- Project Preview - D. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section (In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t - Project Preview - FOR BOARD REVIEW AND COMMENT JULY 26, 2018 2701 Shattuck Avenue Project Preview for Use Permit ZP#2016-0244 to construct a 5-story,

More information

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: October 20, 2016 TO: FROM: Zoning Hearing Officer Planning Staff SUBJECT: Consideration of a Non-Conforming Use Permit, pursuant to Sections 6135

More information

2200 FIFTH STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

2200 FIFTH STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t For Committee Discussion/ Majority Recommendation OCTOBER 20, 2016 Design Review #DRCP2016-0006 of the construction

More information

812 Page Street. Item 10 June 21, Staff Report

812 Page Street. Item 10 June 21, Staff Report Item 10 Department of Planning & Development Land Use Planning Division Staff Report 812 Page Street Tentative Map #8355 to allow condominium ownership in a five (5) unit project with four (4) residential

More information

C. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section ( In-Fill Development Projects ) of the CEQA Guidelines.

C. CEQA Determination: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section ( In-Fill Development Projects ) of the CEQA Guidelines. Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION FEBRUARY 25, 2016 3100 San Pablo Avenue Use Permit #ZP2014-0031 to establish a 42,479 square-foot health club on the first

More information

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION NO. 2005- A RESOLUTION OF THE MARIN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DENYING THE PETER PAPPAS APPEAL AND SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION S ACTION BY DENYING THE PAPPAS DESIGN REVIEW CLEARANCE

More information

WHEREAS, on October 6, 2015, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and recommended the proposed Ordinance Amendments; and

WHEREAS, on October 6, 2015, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and recommended the proposed Ordinance Amendments; and ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AMENDING ARTICLE 2, ARTICLE 5, ARTICLE 30, ARTICLE 36, ARTICLE 37, AND ARTICLE 45 OF THE REDWOOD CITY ZONING ORDINANCE AND AMENDING

More information

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR December 13, 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 3:00 p.m. Members of the public who wish to discuss an item should fill out a speaker identification

More information

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR September 2, 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 10:00 a.m. Members of the public who wish to discuss an item should fill out a speaker identification

More information

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE: JUNE 21, 2017 PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: APPEAL OF HEARING OFFICER S

More information

739 Channing Way PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

739 Channing Way PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW 739 Channing Way PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t For Majority Recommendations SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 Design Review #DRCP2017-0005 to construct two

More information

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING THE COURTYARD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 10 CONDOMINIUMS AND A NEW SPECIFIC PLAN

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING THE COURTYARD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 10 CONDOMINIUMS AND A NEW SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF SIGNAL HILL 2175 Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA 90755-3799 AGENDA ITEM TO: FROM: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION SELENA ALANIS ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING THE

More information

MEETING OF: June 3, Tom Beil, Goring and Straja Architects

MEETING OF: June 3, Tom Beil, Goring and Straja Architects L A N D M A R K S P R E S E R V A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N N o t i c e o f D e c i s i o n MEETING OF: June 3, 2010 Property Address: 2222 Harold Way Also Known As: Armstrong University Action: Structural

More information

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: Downtown Zoning: Downtown Mixed Use (Core)/ Arts District Overlay C-DMU/ADO

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: Downtown Zoning: Downtown Mixed Use (Core)/ Arts District Overlay C-DMU/ADO Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION NOVEMBER 30, 2017 2072 Addison Street Use Permit #2016-0020 to demolish a one-story commercial building, and to construct a seven-story,

More information

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area)

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area) TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT For the meeting of January 11, 2016 Agenda Item 6C Owner/Applicant: Daniel and Jacqueline Olson Project Address: 321 Greenfield Avenue Assessor s Parcel

More information

Item 9 September 7, 2016

Item 9 September 7, 2016 Item 9 September 7, 2016 Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Members of the Planning Commission Kelly Cha, Assistant Planner

More information

2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.

2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter. DRAFT February 11, 2009 BMC 20.28 Infill Housing 20.28.010 Purpose. This chapter establishes special development regulations for a series of housing forms that are different than the traditional detached

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report ~BER~9 Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 10, 2014 Subject: 1801 Angelo

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report çbe~rly Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: March 13, 2014 Subject: 9521 Sunset

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 106 William Avenue PC Meeting: 8/26/14 Agenda Item: 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: August 26, 2014 RE: DR/FAR 14-26, Geoffrey Butler, Applicant; House Properties 77 LLP, Property Owner; 106 William

More information

Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions:

Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions: AGENDA ITEM #4.A TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS Staff Report to the City Council SUBJECT: FROM: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF A CONDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A NEW 3,511

More information

DECISION AND ORDER. PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 45(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (the "Act")

DECISION AND ORDER. PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 45(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (the Act) Court Services Toronto Local Appeal Body 40 Orchard View Blvd Suite 211 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9 DECISION AND ORDER Telephone: 416-392-4697 Fax: 416-696-4307 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: August 12, 2013 Subject: 1184 Loma Linda Drive

More information

AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, :00 P.M. CITY HALL WEST CONFERENCE ROOM A VALLEY BOULEVARD

AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, :00 P.M. CITY HALL WEST CONFERENCE ROOM A VALLEY BOULEVARD AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, 2018 CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON AMY WONG CITY PLANNER JASON C. MIKAELIAN CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 13, 2018 Item #: PZ2018-319 STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI Request: Project Name: Development of Community Compact (DCI) and six concurrent

More information

SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance

SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance REPORT To the Redwood City Planning Commission From Planning Staff February 21, 2017 SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the

More information

MEMORANDUM. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment Maxine Brown-Roberts, Project Manager JL

MEMORANDUM. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment Maxine Brown-Roberts, Project Manager JL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment Maxine Brown-Roberts, Project Manager JL Joel Lawson, Associate Director Development Review DATE: September 9 2016 SUBJECT: OP Report

More information

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU BASICS

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU BASICS SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU BASICS JUNE 2018 Use this guide with its companion documents Santa Cruz County ADU Basics and ADU Design Guide and the resources provided at sccoplanning.com/adu

More information

January 7, 2016 President Ann Lazarus San Francisco Board of Appeals 1650 Mission Street, Suite 304 San Francisco, California Re: Appellant's Br

January 7, 2016 President Ann Lazarus San Francisco Board of Appeals 1650 Mission Street, Suite 304 San Francisco, California Re: Appellant's Br January 7, 2016 President Ann Lazarus San Francisco Board of Appeals 1650 Mission Street, Suite 304 San Francisco, California 94103 Re: Appellant's Brief In Support of Appeal No. 15-192 Regarding the Zoning

More information

LAND USE PLANNING FEES

LAND USE PLANNING FEES LAND USE PLANNING FEES EFFECTIVE July 1, 2017 Adopted May 16, 2017 by Council Resolution No. 67,985-N.S. Administrative Use Permits Tier 1 most complex projects, in or adjacent to a Residential district:

More information

Supplemental Application Form Request for a Waiver of Development Standards via Density Bonus

Supplemental Application Form Request for a Waiver of Development Standards via Density Bonus County of Sacramento Office of Planning and Environmental Review (PER) 827 7 th Street, Room 225 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 874-6141 Supplemental Application Form Request for a Waiver of Development Standards

More information

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017 Meeting Date: April 25, 2017 Agency: City of Belmont Staff Contact: Damon DiDonato, Community Development Department, (650) 637-2908; ddidonato@belmont.gov Agenda Title: Amendments to Sections 24 (Secondary

More information

That the Planning Commission finds and advises EBMUD that the proposed disposal of property is in conformance with the County General Plan.

That the Planning Commission finds and advises EBMUD that the proposed disposal of property is in conformance with the County General Plan. STAFF ANALYSIS JUNE 19, 2006 GPC 2006-02 DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT PROPOSED SALE OF EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT S SYDNEY RESERVOIR PROPERTY: Request by the Real Estate

More information

Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) Detached Accessory Dwellings

Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) Detached Accessory Dwellings DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Housing Division 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, VA 22201 TEL: 703-228-3765 FAX: 703-228-3834 www.arlingtonva.us Memorandum To:

More information

AGENDA FOR THE HEARING EXAMINER

AGENDA FOR THE HEARING EXAMINER AGENDA FOR THE HEARING EXAMINER Tuesday, September 4, 2018 9:00 AM Council Chambers 1. HEARINGS CALLED TO ORDER 2. HEARINGS A. Case # VA18-0016; Address: 5205 Sea Gull Court; Applicant: Robert W Schmid

More information

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: Hearing Officer SUBJECT: Minor Variance #11876 LOCATION: APPLICANT: ZONING DESIGNATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: CASE PLANNER: STAFF

More information

BEVERLY HILLS. Planning Commission Report

BEVERLY HILLS. Planning Commission Report BEVERLY HILLS Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (510) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: Subject: Recommendation: December

More information

CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO

CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 4778 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 21 OF THE GRAND JUNCTION MUNICIPAL CODE) REGARDING ADMINISTRATION AND

More information

STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: PROPONENT: APPLICATION TYPE(S): FILE NUMBER(S): REQUEST: PROJECT LOCATION: SUBMITTED BY: June 23, 2016 at 7:00pm Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)

More information

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b. WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Attachment 3 AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b. ORIGINATED BY: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING PROJECT NAME APPLICATION TYPE APPLICATION

More information

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW AND ADDITIONALLY ROOFTOP

More information

ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS

ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS RZC 21.08 RESIDENTIAL REGULATIONS 21.08.290 Cottage Housing Developments A. Purpose. The purpose of the cottage housing requirements is to: 1. Provide a housing type that

More information

required findings for approval of the variance cannot be made

required findings for approval of the variance cannot be made RESOLUTION NO Rqg A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH DENYING THE APPEAL OF MICHAEL SULLIVAN REGARDING 162 BLUFFS DRIVE AND APPROVING THE PERMITS FOR PROJECT NO 92 151 A On November

More information

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Planning Director, Planning and Development

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Planning Director, Planning and Development Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR December 17, 2013 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, City Manager Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Planning Director, Planning

More information

CITY OF BUENA PARK MINUTES OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING March 2, 2016

CITY OF BUENA PARK MINUTES OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING March 2, 2016 716 CITY OF BUENA PARK MINUTES OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING The Zoning Administrator convened the meeting at 3:00 p.m. on, in the Community Development Conference Room, City of Buena Park Civic Center,

More information

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1 This Chapter presents the development standards for residential projects. Section 2.1 discusses

More information

Urban Design Brief. Proposed Medical / Dental Office 1444 Adelaide Street North. Vireo Health Facility Ltd.

Urban Design Brief. Proposed Medical / Dental Office 1444 Adelaide Street North. Vireo Health Facility Ltd. Urban Design Brief Proposed Medical / Dental Office Vireo Health Facility Ltd. November 27, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 1 LAND USE PLANNING CONTEXT... 1 1.1 The Subject Lands...

More information

PROPOSED FINIDINGS ZONE VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR HEIGHT VARIANCE

PROPOSED FINIDINGS ZONE VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR HEIGHT VARIANCE PROPOSED FINIDINGS ZONE VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR HEIGHT VARIANCE (PURSUANT TO LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 12.27) CONCERNING 10550 WEST BELLAGIO ROAD, LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 Pursuant to Charter Section

More information

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A Wednesday, 9:00 A.M. March 15, 2017 Hearing Room No. 2 Churchill Building, 10019-103 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB Hearing

More information

P RESERVATION C OMMISSION

P RESERVATION C OMMISSION L A N D M A R K S P RESERVATION C OMMISSION S t a f f R e p o r t 2580 Bancroft Way The Bancroft Center REFERRAL NOVEMBER 2, 2017 Demolition Referral: Use Permit (#ZP2017-0083) to demolish an existing,

More information

Mary J. Berg House 2517 Regent Street

Mary J. Berg House 2517 Regent Street CITY OF BERKELEY Ordinance #4694 N.S. LANDMARK APPLICATION Mary J. Berg House 2517 Regent Street Additional Photographs Streetscape showing 2511, 2517 & 2521 Regent Street 2517 Regent Street front façade

More information

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 15, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Council Paul Benoit, City Administrator Consideration of the 2 nd Reading of Ordinance 731 N.S. - Amending Division

More information

Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario

Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario ISSUE DATE: April 24, 2009 PL090103 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario IN THE MATTER OF subsection 45(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Applicant:

More information

City of Brisbane. Zoning Administrator Agenda Report

City of Brisbane. Zoning Administrator Agenda Report City of Brisbane Zoning Administrator Agenda Report TO: John A. Swiecki, Zoning Administrator For the Meeting of 11/16/2015 FROM: Julia Capasso, Associate Planner SUBJECT: 185 Valley Drive; Sign Review

More information

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526 Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526 Phone: (760) 878-0263 FAX: (760) 878-0382 E-Mail: inyoplanning@ Inyocounty.us AGENDA ITEM NO.: 7 (Action

More information

Review Authority. CMC Section (D) requires that applications for a Site Plan Review be reviewed by the commission at a public hearing.

Review Authority. CMC Section (D) requires that applications for a Site Plan Review be reviewed by the commission at a public hearing. File No. 17000690 A request for a Site Plan Review to construct a new 538 square-foot garage and to convert an existing garage into a theater room at 25550 Prado De Amarillo located Site Plan Review Review

More information

Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit

Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 411 Main Street (530) 87-6800 P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 527 Application No. APPLICATION FOR Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit Applicant Information Applicant Street Address Daytime

More information

AGENDA SLOT HOME EVALUATION & TEXT AMENDMENT. 5:30 - Welcome

AGENDA SLOT HOME EVALUATION & TEXT AMENDMENT. 5:30 - Welcome AGENDA 5:30 - Welcome Please sign-in, put a sticker on the map, grab snacks, materials and a seat 5:45 - Staff Presentation 6:15 - Open House Stations Background Information Mixed Use Districts Multi Unit

More information

AGENDA COMMITTEE OPENING OF. use. given the. by staff. CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER CITY PLANNER OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS CHIEF BUILDING

AGENDA COMMITTEE OPENING OF. use. given the. by staff. CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER CITY PLANNER OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS CHIEF BUILDING AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER PLANNING COMMISSION CITY PLANNER JASON C. MIKAELIAN CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS TUESDAY,

More information

Secondary Dwelling Unit

Secondary Dwelling Unit Secondary Dwelling Unit Review of Special Use Regulations (City Code Section 17.228.105) The purpose of this application is to determine whether or not your project meets the Planning and Development Code

More information

PROPOSED FINDINGS FOR ZONE HEIGHT VARIANCE APPLICATION

PROPOSED FINDINGS FOR ZONE HEIGHT VARIANCE APPLICATION PROPOSED FINDINGS FOR ZONE HEIGHT VARIANCE APPLICATION PURSUANT TO LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 12.27 FOR 10550 BELLAGIO ROAD, LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 1. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance

More information

Oceanside Zoning Ordinance

Oceanside Zoning Ordinance Oceanside Zoning Ordinance 3006 Accessory Dwelling Units (1992 and Redevelopment Zoning Ordinance) Amendments Article 42 Accessory Dwelling Units (1986 Zoning Ordinance) New [Strike-thru = Deleted language,

More information

City Council 1-15-08- Exhibit A Mansionization Code Amendments Recommended by Planning Commission 11-14-07 INCREASE OPEN SPACE AND SETBACKS Section 10.12.030 and A.12.030 Property Development Regulations:

More information

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAUSALITO AMENDING TITLE 10 TO MODIFY SECTION 10.44

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAUSALITO AMENDING TITLE 10 TO MODIFY SECTION 10.44 ORDINANCE NO. 1247 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAUSALITO AMENDING TITLE 10 TO MODIFY SECTION 10.44.080 "ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS" OF THE SAUSALITO MUNICIPAL CODE TO CONFORM TO STATE

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: REQUEST TO DEMOLISH TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS ON TWO ADJOINING LOTS AND CONSTRUCT TEN RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT 947 GENESEE AVENUE AND 944

More information

Accessory Dwelling Units

Accessory Dwelling Units Planning & Building Department 3675 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Suite 210 Lafayette, CA 94549-1968 Tel. (925) 284-1976 Fax (925) 284-1122 http://www.ci.lafayette.ca.us Accessory Dwelling Units 6-560 Purpose

More information

39 Thora Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

39 Thora Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 39 Thora Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report Date: January 28, 2014 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Scarborough Community Council Director, Community

More information

A. CEQA Determination: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is being prepared.

A. CEQA Determination: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is being prepared. Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD DISCUSSION MARCH 10, 2016 1900 Fourth Street Draft EIR Scoping Session for Use Permit #ZP2015-0068 and Structural Alteration

More information

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR February 19, 2019 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board LDC2018-10020 Item #11 S U M M A R Y Applicant The City of Orlando ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR Applicant s Request Update

More information

Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update

Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update ADU's (Accessory Dwelling Units) The draft zoning ordinance update permits ADU s as an accessory use in all single-family residential zoning districts.

More information

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: Zoning Administrator FROM: Reviewed by: Sergio Klotz, AICP, Assistant Development Services DirctJ. o ~ Prepared by: Laura Stokes, Housing Coordinator I Assistant

More information

Re: Proposed Safeway renovation and expansion on Henry/Shattuck Avenue

Re: Proposed Safeway renovation and expansion on Henry/Shattuck Avenue Page 1 of 12 1451 Henry Street Berkeley, CA 94709 September 2, 2010 City of Berkeley Planning & Development Department 2120 Milvia St. Berkeley, CA 94704 Re: Proposed Safeway renovation and expansion on

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meeting Date: January 10, 2019 Item #: PZ2019-393 Project Name: Applicant and Owner: Proposed Development: Requests: STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI Dresden Heights Phase

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: September 27, 2012 Subject: 366 North Rodeo

More information

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008 PROJECT: Gerrity Parking in Side Setback and Gerrity Student Housing Addition HEARINGDATE: January 28, 2008 STAFF/PHONE: J. Ritterbeck,

More information

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016 Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; 801-535-7932 Date: December 14, 2016 Re: 1611 South 1600 East PLANNED

More information

Item 10 November 16, 2016

Item 10 November 16, 2016 Item 10 November 16, 2016 Planning and Development Department Land Use Planning Division STAFF REPORT DATE: November 16, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Members of the Planning Commission Alene Pearson, Associate

More information