Water Use in the Multi family Housing Sector. Jack C. Kiefer, Ph.D. Lisa R. Krentz

Similar documents
WRF Webcast. Water Use in the Multi-family Housing Sector

MULTIFAMILY PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE RESEARCH. City of Phoenix Water Services Department

Condominium Conversions in. Determinants

Download Presentation

ANALYSIS OF WATER USE PATTERNS IN MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENCES FINAL REPORT

Technical Description of the Freddie Mac House Price Index

Housing Characteristics

OVERVIEW OF RECENT/EXPECTED ECONOMIC/HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL BOND ANALYSTS

Housing Supply Restrictions Across the United States

Housing Issues Report Shoreline Towers Inc. Proposal 2313 & 2323 Lake Shore Boulevard West. Prepared by PMG Planning Consultants November 18, 2014

Trends in Housing Occupancy

Residential Demographic Multipliers

Myth Busting: The Truth About Multifamily Renters

2016 Census Bulletin Changing Composition of the Housing Stock

Volume Title: Well Worth Saving: How the New Deal Safeguarded Home Ownership

June 12, 2014 Housing Data: Statistics and Trends

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING DISTRICT CONSERVATION PRICING GUIDANCE JANUARY 2014

Appendix 1: Gisborne District Quarterly Market Indicators Report April National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity

Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo and Guelph CMAs

A STUDY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA S APARTMENT RENTAL MARKET 2000 TO 2015: THE ROLE OF MILLENNIALS

THAT Council receives for information the Report from the Planner II dated April 25, 2016 with respect to the annual Housing Report update.

Attachment 3. Guelph s Housing Statistical Profile

Research & Forecast Report New Zealand Workplace Report. Occupational trends across New Zealand. Accelerating success.

2015 Housing Report. kelowna.ca. April Water Street Kelowna, BC V1Y 1J4 TEL FAX

Multifamily Market Commentary February 2017

SJC Comprehensive Plan Update Housing Needs Assessment Briefing. County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017

The New Starts Grant and Affordable Housing A Roadmap for Austin s Project Connect

MONROE COUNTY HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT

CITY OF VANCOUVER RENTAL HOUSING STRATEGY RESEARCH AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT SYNTHESIS REPORT FINAL

Washington Market Highlights: Fourth Quarter 2017

Washington Market Highlights: Third Quarter 2018

2.2 Future Demand Projection Methodology

Washington Market Highlights: Fourth Quarter 2018

Chapter 12 Changes Since This is just a brief and cursory comparison. More analysis will be done at a later date.

Table of Contents. Title Page # Title Page # List of Tables ii 6.7 Rental Market - Townhome and Apart ment Rents

OVERVIEW OF RECENT/EXPECTED ECONOMIC/ HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS

Young-Adult Housing Demand Continues to Slide, But Young Homeowners Experience Vastly Improved Affordability

Multifamily Market Commentary December 2015 Single-Family Rental Sector Attracting Institutional Investment

APPENDIX C CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ENERGIZE PHOENIX CORRIDOR

Toronto Economic & Housing Market Outlook 2003

Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study

III. Housing Profile and Analysis

TOOLS TO BALANCE SUPPLY. Rail~Volution October 22, 2013 Dan Bertolet VIA Architecture and Planning

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development

Salem HNA and EOA Advisory Committee Meeting #6

Median Income and Median Home Price

25 N 23rd STREET COMMERCIAL-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

MULTIFAMILY MARKET REPORT GREATER TORONTO AREA FALL 2017

Document under Separate Cover Refer to LPS State of Housing

METRO VANCOUVER LEVEL HOUSING DATA TABLE JUNE, 2016

IHS Regional Housing Market Segmentation Analysis

Housing Needs Survey Report. Arlesey

Affordably- Priced Housing

UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPER S DECISION- MAKING IN THE REGION OF WATERLOO

DEMAND FR HOUSING IN PROVINCE OF SINDH (PAKISTAN)

ELECTRICAL LOAD CHARACTERISTICS OF SUPERINSULATED MULTIFAMILY HOUSING: A CASE STUDY

REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW 1 st Half of 2015

The Market Watch Monthly Housing Report. Coachella Valley Median Detached Home Price Dec Dec 2016

MULTIFAMILY APARTMENT MARKETS IN THE WEST: METRO AREA APARTMENT CYCLES AND THEIR TRENDS MANOVA TEST:

2011 Census Bulletin #4 Dwellings & Structure Type in Metro Vancouver

Appendix D HOUSING WORK GROUP REPORT JULY 10, 2002

Introduction. Charlotte Fagan, Skyler Larrimore, and Niko Martell

CHAPTER 2 VACANT AND REDEVELOPABLE LAND INVENTORY

Rental Housing Strategy Study # 1

General Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use. Learning Objectives

January Salem Housing Needs Analysis and Economic Opportunities Analysis. Draft Summary Report. ECONorthwest

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016

Minneapolis St. Paul Residential Real Estate Index

STATE OF THE MULTIFAMILY MARKET MACRO VIEW

New affordable housing production hits record low in 2014

TRI-CITIES ANNUAL HOUSING AFFORDABILITY REPORT

Residential Building Stock Assessment (RBSA)for Multi-Family Housing

2006 Census Housing Series: Issue 9 Inuit Households in Canada

CHAPTER 2: HOUSING. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 Existing Housing Characteristics

Morningside Heights Harlem. Peter Comitini Senior VP Associate Broker The Corcoran Group

Planning and Development Department Building and Development Permit Summary Report

November An updated analysis of the overall housing needs of the City of Aberdeen. Prepared by: Community Partners Research, Inc.

How Did Foreclosures Affect Property Values in Georgia School Districts?

HOUSING IN OUR COMMUNITIES: THE NUMBERS

An Introduction to RPX INTRODUCTION

Table 1: Maximum Allowable PIFs Under Industry Standard Calculation Methods (3/4" Connection Size)

Coachella Valley Median Detached Home Price April April 2017

Chapter 4: Housing and Neighborhoods

ANALYSIS OF THE CENTRAL VIRGINIA AREA HOUSING MARKET 1st quarter 2013 By Lisa A. Sturtevant, PhD George Mason University Center for Regional Analysis

Economic Effects of the New Housing Industry in the Sacramento Region

6. Review of Property Value Impacts at Rapid Transit Stations and Lines

Review of the Prices of Rents and Owner-occupied Houses in Japan

Residential December 2009

Town of Prescott Valley 2013 Land Use Assumptions

Metro Boston Perfect Fit Parking Initiative

Coachella Valley Median Detached Home Price Mar Mar 2018

Demographic Multipliers ***** Development Impacts

Residential March 2010

CBER-LIED Report on Housing Market Conditions

Downtown Housing Policy

Coachella Valley Median Detached Home Price May May 2018

Ontario Rental Market Overview & Outlook

FINAL REPORT AN ANALYSIS OF SECONDARY ROAD MAINTENANCE PAYMENTS TO HENRICO AND ARLINGTON COUNTIES WITH THE DECEMBER 2001 UPDATE

Old Neighborhoods and Housing Provide New Models for the Future.

Transcription:

Water Use in the Multi family Housing Sector Jack C. Kiefer, Ph.D. Lisa R. Krentz

Presentation Overview Background on WRF 4554 Data sources Water use comparisons Examples of modeling variability in water use Summary and conclusions

The Multifamily Housing Sector About 25% percent of housing (or about 33 million residences) in the U.S Share of multifamily dwellings increasing in some areas Multifamily housing dominant residential sector in some denser urban areas Many areas plan to direct future development or densify

Water Research Foundation Project 4554 Water Use in the Multifamily Housing Sector Narrow knowledge gaps Develop, demonstrate, and recommend analytical strategies for: Estimating multifamily water use Categorizing multifamily properties Forecasting and evaluating water use patterns

Defining what is Multi-family Everything other than traditional single-family detached homes Any residential property w/2+ units Master-metered residential properties General practice to lump MF into general residential or commercial customer classes detached, semidetached, row house, or multi-family structures with 5 or more units. Ownership/Tenure Rental Apartments Duplex Multiplex Individually Owned Condominiums Townhouses Jointly Owned Cooperatives

What Multifamily looks like By Dan Breyfogle (Own work) CC BY SA 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons By Eaaumi Own work, CC BY SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org /w/index.php?curid=9425616

Selected Research Questions To what extent does multifamily water use differ from single-family use? Does water use differ among subclasses of multifamily sector? What factors influence water use in the multifamily sector and major sub-classes? Does greater development density lead to less use? What are the effects of given property features? Can we inform forecasting and evaluation efforts?

Data Collection Secondary information only Water use - properties and/or classes Number of dwelling units (scale measure) Property sub-classification schemes Property characteristics Other potentially influential variables Price Socioeconomic Climatic

Utility Partners Denver Water New York City Department of Environmental Protection Phoenix Water Services San Diego County Water Authority Tampa Bay Water

Other Key Data Sources U.S. Census American Housing Survey American Community Survey New York University Furman Center Fannie Mae

What the US Census tells us Increase in share of population living in multiple unit structures Rental tenure dominates Lower incomes Smaller households Younger householders Proportionally fewer (in unit) clothes washers and dish washers (especially renter-occupied)

Comparison of Unit Usage Rates (gallons per dwelling unit per day) Utility Multi-family Sector (Composite) Units Mean use per unit Denver (2014) 192,560 133 Range of ~65 gpd New York City (2014) 2,143,108* 170 Phoenix (2014) 181,101 182 San Diego County (2012) Tampa Bay Water (2014) 423,788 164 280,865 117 *Excludes properties designated as One-Family Dwelling or Mixed Residential/Commercial Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Comparison of Unit Usage Rates (gallons per dwelling unit per day) Utility Multi-family Sector (Composite) Units Mean use per unit Single-Family Sector Units Mean use per unit Ratio SF Mean to MF Mean Denver (2014) 192,560 133 202,367 271 2.0 New York City (2014) 2,143,108* 170 315,246 202 1.2 Phoenix (2014) 181,101 182 305,341 331 1.8 San Diego County (2012) Tampa Bay Water (2014) 423,788 164 670,692 308 1.9 Range of ~140 gpd 280,865 117 404,903 191 1.6 *Excludes properties designated as One-Family Dwelling or Mixed Residential/Commercial MF<SF in all cases Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Annual Precipitation and Average Unit Use Single-Family Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Annual Precipitation and Average Unit Use Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Estimated Average Annual Water Use Per Capita for Five Water Systems (gallons per capita per day) Single-Family Multifamily 120 100 100 111 104 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) 80 60 40 73 61 68 83 71 70 56 20 0 Denver (2014) New York City (2014) Phoenix (2014) San Diego County (2012) Tampa Bay Water (2014) Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Estimated Average "Min-Month" Water Use Per Capita for Five Water Systems (gallons per capita per day) Single-Family Multifamily 120 100 Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD) 80 60 40 49 54 55 66 82 70 77 64 60 55 20 0 Denver (2014) New York City (2014) Phoenix (2014) San Diego County (2012) Tampa Bay Water (2014) Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Examples of Multi-family Seasonal Usage Patterns Phoenix (2002 2014) Tampa Bay Water (2002 2014) 1.48 1.06 Common Seasonal Pattern Summer peak Winter Trough Unique Seasonal Pattern Spring is dry season Snowbirds /Spring Break Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Evaluation of Sub-Classification Do average usage patterns differ significantly based on definitional groupings? Analysis depended on use of external and linkable data for classification schemes Sub-classification was found to affect sample statistics in all case analyses Differences in definitions/classification criteria prevented meaningful cross-utility comparisons

New York City Classifications Multi-family Two or Three Family Dwellings Multi-family Buildings Mixed Residential & Commercial Two Family Dwellings 4 additional subclasses Condominiums 8 additional subclasses Elevator Apartments 10 additional subclasses Walk up Apartments 10 additional subclasses Residence Multiple Use 7 additional subclasses Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

New York City Classifications Multi-family Two or Three Family Dwellings Multi-family Buildings Mixed Residential & Commercial Two Family Dwellings 4 additional subclasses Condominiums 8 additional subclasses Elevator Apartments 10 additional subclasses Walk up Apartments 10 additional subclasses Residence Multiple Use 7 additional subclasses Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

New York City Mean 2014 Unit Use for Building Sub-Classes within "Elevator Apartments" Building and Multi-family Buildings" Land Use Tax Class (GPUD) 250 226 200 200 185 181 Gallons per Unit per Day (GPUD) 150 100 50 0 Cannot easily infer reasons for differences based on class names alone Fireproof (Standard Construction Without Stores) Co op Conversion From Loft/Warehouse Miscellaneous Semi fireproof (Without Stores) 161 Converted 150 Cooperatives (Other Than Condominiums) 139 Artists in Residence 120 Luxury Type Multifamily Buildings Elevator Apartments Subclass Average

Seasonal Peaking and Housing Density by Sub-class (Phoenix) Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Median Unit Use and Housing Density by Sub-class (Tampa Bay Water) Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Median Unit Use and Housing Density by Sub-class (New York City) Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Assessment of Multifamily Demand Determinants San Diego County Tampa Bay Water New York City 2012 Fannie Mae Multifamily Market Research Energy and Water Survey Tampa Bay Water Phoenix New York City Denver

Multi-family Class-level Forecast Model (San Diego County) Balanced panel model of water use, socioeconomics, weather, and climate 22 agencies, 120 months each Estimated Variable Multi-family Elasticity Marginal Price for Water (inflation-adjusted) -0.14 Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted) +0.07 Housing Density (housing units per acre) -0.30 Household Size +0.56

Multi-family Class-level Forecast Model (San Diego County) Balanced panel model of water use, socioeconomics, weather, and climate 22 agencies, 120 months each Variable Estimated Multi-family Elasticity Estimated Single- Family Elasticity Marginal Price for Water (inflation-adjusted) -0.14 < -0.23 Median Household Income (inflation-adjusted) +0.07 < +0.54 Housing Density (housing units per acre) -0.30-0.31 Household Size +0.56 +0.44 <

Factor Analysis of NYC Community Districts Socioeconomic data from NYU Furman Center available for 57 metrics across 59 Community Districts (64 metrics total) 1. Aggregate premise level water use data to community district level 2. Condense demographic metrics into fewer thematic factors 3. Evaluate median water use per dwelling unit with respect to factor scores

Factor Analysis of NYC Community Districts Thematic Factor Affluence Poverty Property Value/Cooling Towers Severe Crowding Estimated Effect of 1 unit change in factor score -18 gpud +23 gpud +8 gpud +15 gpud Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Property-level Assessments (Fannie Mae Survey) Sample of 955 multi-family properties for 2012 categorized by broad region Regression analysis of cross-sectional data on multi-family property features, accounting for region Variable Estimated Elasticity or Effect Average Cost of Water -0.26 Presence of Pool +10% Tenant Pays for Water -17% Property Receives Govt Subsidy -12% Property Built >=2001-16% Level + Mechanism Senior Living Facility -18%

Property-level Assessments (Utility-provided) Matrix of Property-Level Data Provided System Units Lot Size Year Built Assessed Value Presence of Pool(s) Presence of Reclaimed Water Presence of Cooling Tower(s) Denver X X (pervious area) X New York City X X X X X Phoenix X X X Tampa Bay Water X (Apt only X X X X X X X (Apt only)

System Denver (2015) Tampa Bay Water (2010-2014 average) Phoenix (2010-2014 average) New York City (2014) Class Density (Units/Acre) Elasticity Assessed Value Elasticity Effect of Pool(s) Effect of Reclaimed Water Effect of Cooling Tower(s) Age Profile Multi-family Total -0.18 +-+- Access to alternative supplies has Pools increase significant effect water use All density estimates Effects of income on TBW demands negative and proxy are mixed statistically significant Multi-family Total -0.14 0.10 +9.4% -20.5% +-+- Condo -0.14 0.09 +7.8% -18.2% +-+ Townhouse -0.06 0.21 +13.0% -18.4% +- Less than 10 Units -0.05 0.02 +20.5% -17.4% +-+- 10 or More Units -0.21-0.05 +9.9% -4.7% Multi-family Total -0.44 +-+ Apartment -0.45 +20.3% +28.7% +-+ Condo -0.54 +- Impact of cooling towers proportionally larger in the desert Multiplex -0.23 +-+- Condominiums -0.14 0.18 +18.4% +-+- Elevator Apartments -0.20-0.04 +15.7% +-+- Walk-up Apartments -0.08-0.01 +5.8% -+-+ Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Summary & Conclusions Water use per unit in the Multi-family sector is generally lower than water use per unit in the Single-family sector The gap between SF and MF unit usage rates narrows when accounting for household size and seasonality For a given climate, generally lower seasonal use in the MF sector relative to SF

Summary & Conclusions Development density is statistically important More units per acre (i.e., higher unit density) - lower unit usage rates Results are consistent with Notion of shared outdoor (and other) uses Less irrigated area

Summary & Conclusions Two main effects from densification Between class: MF is denser than SF Within class: more dense MF, generally less water use (per dwelling unit)

Summary & Conclusions Water use in the MF sector is also influenced by Property features (water end uses, age) Socioeconomics Price The estimated effects of water use determinants tend to vary by geographic area Underlying climate Sector/subclass structure

Summary & Conclusions The ability to obtain information on housing units is essential for accounting for scale Obtaining information on units typically permits additional classification options Sub-classification can affect sample statistics and modeling relationships this may matter for certain planning and evaluation purposes

Recommendations Keep a watchful eye on housing trends Recognize potential impacts of densification and other development policies Test for statistical associations with key variables for the purposes of forecasting and profiling Seek more uniformity and consistency in classifying and sub-classifying multi-family Better metrics More robust comparisons

Thank You! Jack C. Kiefer, Ph.D. Hazen and Sawyer 3401 Professional Park Drive Marion, IL 62959 (618) 889-0498 jkiefer@hazenandsawyer.com Maureen Hodgins Research Manager Water Research Foundation 6666 West Quincy Avenue Denver, Colorado 80235 (303) 734-3465 mhodgins@waterrf.org

Extra Support Slides

What the US Census tells us Increase in share of population living in multiple unit structures Rental tenure dominates Lower incomes Smaller households Younger householders Proportionally fewer (in unit) clothes washers and dish washers (especially renter-occupied)

Ratio of Single-Family to Multifamily Usage Rate Estimates for Five Water Systems Ratio Annual Use per Unit Ratio Annual Use per Capita Ratio "Min-Month" Use per Capita 2.5 2 2.0 1.8 1.9 SF Metric Value/MF Metric Value 1.5 1 1.4 0.9 1.2 0.9 0.8 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.2 1.1 0.5 0 Denver (2014) New York City (2014) Phoenix (2014) San Diego County (2012) Tampa Bay Water (2014) Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Comparison of Unit Usage Rates (gallons per unit per day) Utility Multifamily Sector (Composite) Units Mean (Grand) Median Denver (2014) 192,560 133 127 New York City (2014) Phoenix (2014) San Diego County (2012) Tampa Bay Water (2014) 2,143,108* 170 137 181,101 182 158 423,788 164 n/a 280,865 117 97 *Excludes properties designated as One-Family Dwelling or Mixed Residential/Commercial Relatively weak association with climate differences Distributions skewed to the right Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

Comparison of Unit Usage Rates (gallons per unit per day) Utility Multifamily Sector (Composite) Units Mean (Grand) Single-Family Sector Median Units Mean Median Denver (2014) 192,560 133 127 202,367 271 n/a New York City (2014) 2,143,108* 170 137 315,246 202 170 Phoenix MF<SF 181,101 (2014) in all cases 182 158 305,341 331 242 San Diego County (2012) 423,788 164 n/a 670,692 308 n/a Tampa Bay Water (2014) 280,865 117 97 404,903 191 150 *Excludes properties designated as One-Family Dwelling or Mixed Residential/Commercial Stronger association with climate in SF sector Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. 2018. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.

250 New York City Mean 2014 Unit Use by Residential Land Use Tax Classes (GPUD) 200 202 201 Gallons per Unit per Day (GPUD) 150 100 171 167 50 0 One Family Dwellings Mixed Residential & Commercial Buildings Multi-Family Buildings Two-Three Family Dwelling

176 New York City Mean 2014 Unit Use for Building Classes within Multi-family Buildings" Land Use Tax Class (GPUD) 174 174 172 Gallons per Unit per Day (GPUD) 172 170 168 166 166 164 162 ELEVATOR APARTMENTS CONDOMINIUMS WALK UP APARTMENTS Multifamily Buildings Class Average

Property-level Assessments (Fannie Mae Survey) Sample of 955 multi-family properties for 2012 categorized by broad region

25 Plot of Building Age Portion of Regression Equation = Exp(1.9247 + 0.0789*AGE - 0.0021*AGE^2 + 1.9756e-05*AGE^3-6.3819e- 08*AGE^4) Denver Age profile: +-+- 20 Calculated Value 15 10 Accounting for number of units and pervious area, housing stock built in 1986 would be simulated as using the most water per premise in 2015 5 0 Older 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 Implied Calendar Year Source: Kiefer, J. and L. Krentz. Forthcoming. Water Use in the Multi Family Housing Sector. Project #4554. Denver, Colo.: Water Research Foundation.