ARS Review of Agency Plans

Similar documents
GUIDELINES FOR THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT. Introduction

106?! WHAT IS THAT? Elizabeth L. Davoli, R.P.A. DOTD Environmental Section 2007 LTEC

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT FOR VARIOUS HUD-FUNDED PROGRAMS AMONG THE CITY OF SAVANNAH AND THE GEORGIA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER.

Standards for Documents Submitted for SHPO Review. in Compliance with Historic Preservation Laws

A. RULES IMPLEMENTING A.R.S. ' DISTURBING HUMAN REMAINS OR FUNERARY OBJECTS ON LANDS OTHER THAN STATE LANDS

1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize guidance on those requirements generally applicable to grant programs.

Historic Preservation Assessment Regulatory Background

CHAPTER 3: IDENTIFYING SECTION 4(f) PROPERTIES

NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES

State Review for Historic Properties

MASON COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

Subtitle H Agricultural Conservation Easement Program

CURRENT THROUGH PL , APPROVED 11/11/2009

6.5 LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT SECTION

CULTURAL RESOURCES CULTURAL PROPERTIES AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW OF PROPOSED STATE UNDERTAKINGS THAT MAY AFFECT REGISTERED CULTURAL PROPERTIES

Cartersville Code of Ordinances Historic Preservation Commission

6.5 LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT SECTION

FORT MYERS BEACH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE

content chapter Section 4(f) Parks, Recreation Areas, Historic Sites, Wildlife and Waterfowl Refuges

Section 4(f) Why don t we build the road through this green space over here?

TITLE 42 LUMMI NATION CODE OF LAWS LAND TENURE CODE

Historic Preservation Handbook for Texans: Laws and Incentives at the Local, State and Federal Levels

Chapter 153: City of San Gabriel Municipal Code HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCE ORDINANCE

A LAYPERSON S GUIDE TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION LAW

SUBSTITUTE NO. 3 TO ORDINANCE NO

Whereas, the Forests have invited recreation residence and organizational camp/club permit holders to comment on this Programmatic Agreement; and

TOWNSHIP OF FORKS NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO.

National Trust for Historic Preservation Collections Management Policy INTRODUCTION

Proponent s Guide to the NCC s Federal Land Use, Design and Transaction Approvals Process

SAMPLE LANGUAGE FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department proposes to amend 25 CFR 151

Land Bank Program. A Briefing to the Housing Committee. Housing/Community Services Department September 19, 2016

STIPULATIONS I. TERMINATION OF EXISTING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING.

ORDINANCE NO. 972 N.S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES ADDING ARTICLE V. CHAPTER OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION

New Mexico Register / Volume XVI, Number 15 / August 15, 2005

PACIFIC REGION LAND ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS

OUTLINE OF THE CDBG-DR FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE (February 23, 2018)

Planning Commission Staff Report August 6, 2015

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Neighborhood Stabilization Program Closeout Checklist

25 CFR, PART 151 LAND ACQUISITIONS

STATUTORY AUTHORITY: NMSA 1978, Section of the Cultural Properties Act. [ NMAC - N, 10/1/12]

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE KANE COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE. Ordinance No

The City shall support a suitable mix of housing by: [9J (3)(c)(5)]

SECTION 4(F) & CHAPTER 26. TxDOT Environmental Conference 2017

HOUSING ELEMENT GOAL, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

This is a New Findings of Adequacy for a Recorded Plat (Plat Book 179, Page 131) LAND USE Vacant Effective Plan: Pompano Beach

Tenant Improvement Program (TIP) Design Review

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Region 2, USDA Forest Service

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES SENIORS AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES DIVISION OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CHAPTER 411

HISTORIC PRESERVATION What Durham REALTORS Need to Know. Durham Regional Association of REALTORS

URBAN REDEVELOMENT AUTHORITY OF PITTSBURGH REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) Appraisal Services

Hartford Historic Sites & Structures Survey Request for Proposals

1816, Independence Hall 1850, Washington s Headquarters

State, County, or Municipal Agency or instrumentality thereof, applying for authorization

Codified Ordinances of Pickerington, Ohio

QqESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT HISTORIC PROPERTIES SURVEY

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY, THE VIRGINIA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE, U.S

DODGE CITY HISTORIC RESOURCES PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

Historic Preservation 1

Senate Bill No CHAPTER 928. An act to amend Section of the Government Code, relating to housing.

Subpart A Disclosure of Known Lead-Based Paint and/or Lead-Based Paint Hazards Upon Sale or Lease of Residential

Appendix 1 Draft Memorandum of Agreement

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN Responses to Questionnaire for HUD s Initiative on Removal of Regulatory Barriers: May 11, 2007 Status

PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION RESTRICTION

VHDA Low Income Housing Tax Credit Manual Version: P. Relocation Plan Guidelines

Policies and Procedures No. 50

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

Proposed 2.53 Acres Park Plan Designation: Regional Activity Center: See attached comments from the Planning Council.

YUROK INDIAN HOUSING AUTHORITY

13 NONCONFORMITIES [Revises Z-4]

ORDINANCE NO

BRUNSWICK-GLYNN COUNTY JOINT WATER AND SEWER COMMISSION

Documentation Standard for an Individual Section 4(f) Evaluation

through notice in local newspapers and has considered all recommendations, if any, into this PA; and

INITIAL SUMMARY OF HIGHLIGHTS IN 2018 FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE FOR $7.4 BILLION Revised Wednesday, February 7 Introduction

GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

Oct 1, 2011 thru Dec 31, 2011 Performance Report

LCRA BOARD POLICY 401 LAND RESOURCES. Sept. 21, 2016

MN STATUTES ANNOTATED 145A.04 POWERS AND DUTIES OF BOARD OF HEALTH. Subdivision 1.Jurisdiction; enforcement. A county or multicounty board of health

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC Sec. 470f), and Section 110(f) of the same Act (16 USC Sec. 470h-2(f)); and,

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, periodically the Conservation, Development and Planning Department

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DISPOSAL FEE OWNERSHIP OF YELLOW CREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK PROPERTIES

Field CPD Division Directors Issued: July 17, 2001 Field Environmental Officers Expires: July 17, 2002 HOME Participating Jurisdictions and Partners

IV. REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR MINOR SUBDIVISIONS

MUNICIPAL SERVICES PROJECT LAND ACQUISITION FRAMEWORK

LANDMARK. Planning, Zoning & Economic Development Department. 209 N. York Street Elmhurst, Illinois (630) (p) (630) (f) DATE

Section 4.1 LAND TITLE

C HAPTER 15: N ONCONFORMITIES

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

CRISIS HOUSING ASSISTANCE FUNDS

CONSERVATION EASEMENTS & OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT

BOULDER COUNTY/BROOMFIELD COUNTY REGIONAL CONSORTIUM S COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS DISPLACEMENT PLAN

INVENTORY POLICY For Real Property

KAW HOUSING AUTHORITY USEFUL LIFE POLICY ORIGINAL ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION # DATED: 02/21/2017

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

ARIZONA SHPO HANDBOOK FOR PREPARING A NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION

HISTORIC PROPERTY GRANT AND REVOLVING LOAN PROGRAM SUMMARY

GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA. For Granting Tax Abatement in the North Killeen Revitalization Area. Designated by the City of Killeen, Texas

AFFORDABLE. HousiNG AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Transcription:

ARS 41-864 Review of Agency Plans The state historic preservation officer has thirty working days in which to review and comment on any plans of a state agency which involve property which is included or may qualify for inclusion on the Arizona register of historic places, including any construction project, sale, lease or acquisition of historic properties, to ensure that the prehistorical, historical, architectural or culturally significant values will be preserved or enhanced.

ARS 41-864 Review of Agency Plans SHPO has 30 working days to review and comment on agency plans involving property included on or qualifying for the Arizona Register of Historic Places (ARHP). SHPO s responsibility: Ensure that the following values are preserved or enhanced: Prehistorical values Historical values Architectural values Culturally significant values

Basic Steps in the Review of Agency Plans Step I: Describe Agency Plan Step II: Identify & Evaluate Properties Step III: Assess Effects of Plan on properties listed on or eligible for the ARHP Step IV: Eliminate or Minimize Harm to properties on or eligible for the ARHP

Step I. Agency Plan A state project, activity, program, permit, or license involving a property listed in or eligible for the ARHP A plan that has potential to impact or alter a property listed in or eligible for the ARHP

Step I. Agency Plan Examples Renovation, rehabilitation, modification, demolition, abandonment of buildings or structures Sale, lease or transfer of real property New construction, infrastructure development Issuing a right of way, easement, permit Granting state funds or licenses for various types of projects

Step I. Identify the Scope of the Plan Consider all of the activities involved in the plan that may have an effect on ARHP listed or qualifying properties Identify the geographic area of the project including Alternative project sites Staging areas and construction corridors Additional effects

Step I. Identify Other Parties Agency identifies other state, county, municipal, Tribal, public, and federal agencies that may have legal jurisdiction or interest in the plan Agency can seek assistance from the SHPO to identify other interested parties Consult with other parties early and often

Step I. Begin Formal Consultation with SHPO Provide SHPO with a full description of the plan Follow Standards for Inventory Documents Submitted for SHPO Review in Compliance with Historic Preservation Laws Seek recommendations from the SHPO

Step II. Identify Historic Properties Conduct identification efforts with assistance from appropriate professionals such as archaeologists, architects, historians, ethnographers/ethnohistorians, and/or Native American practitioners Archival Records Search Electronic Inventory (AZSITE) Field Survey Use State Standards for Conducting and Reporting Cultural Resource Surveys

Step II. Evaluate Properties If no properties present, Agency notifies SHPO. Agency applies the ARHP criteria for eligibility to properties identified during survey efforts Agency provides the SHPO with its opinions/ recommendations on the eligibility of identified properties and supporting documentation The SHPO reviews the agency s findings and provides comments and determinations

Step III. Findings No ARHP Properties Affected the SHPO determines in consultation with the Agency that no ARHP listed or qualifying properties are in the area affected by the plan No Adverse Affect there are ARHP listed or qualifying properties present but the plan will not affect them ARHP Properties May be Affected The plan may or will affect properties listed or qualifying for the ARHP ARHP Status Cannot Be Determined Requires more information, such as eligibility testing or archival research Resubmit results to SHPO for evaluation

Step III. Criteria for Assessing Harm/Effects/Enhancement Destruction, damage, or alteration to all or part of a property Loss of integrity Neglect or abandonment of a property, resulting in its deterioration or destruction Transfer, lease, or sale of the property or the land it is on Improvement of a property by adherence to Secretary of Interior Standards

Step IV. Consult to Eliminate or Minimize Harm/Effect Agency consults with the SHPO (and any other parties) to minimize or eliminate harm by: Modifying plan to eliminate or minimize harm to ARHP listed/eligible properties Enhance the property s historic, archaeological, architectural, or culturally significant values Mitigate the harm- e.g., document the property or conduct data recovery Follow SHPO Standards for Documentation: Standards for Documentation of Historical Properties (Buildings and Structures) State Documentation Standards for Archaeological Properties

Consult with SHPO Describe Agency Plan Establish plan Determine scope of efforts Identify other agencies, Indian Tribes or other parties PLAN MAY AFFECT ARHP PROPERTIES NO POTENTIAL FOR PLAN TO AFFECT ARHP PROPERTIES PROCEED WITH PLAN Consult with SHPO Consult with SHPO Identify & Evaluate Historic Properties Identify historic properties Evaluate eligibility for the ARHP ARHP PROPERTIES ARE AFFECTED Assess Effects Assess plan s effects on qualities that make the property eligible for the ARHP NO ARHP PROPERTIES AFFECTED PROCEED WITH PLAN NO ARHP PROPERTIES HARMED BY PLAN Consult with SHPO ARHP PROPERTIES ARE HARMED BY PLAN Minimize or Mitigate Harm Identify ways to minimize or mitigate harm to property PROCEED WITH PLAN COMPLETE MINIMIZATION/ MITIGATION PROCEED WITH PLAN