Dear Mr. Fusarelli and Members of the Long Range Planning Committee:

Similar documents
3804 Wilson Boulevard (Staples Site) Special General Land Use Plan Study

SP #447, 11 th & Vermont

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

S IT E PL A N R E V IE W C OM M IT T E E

3804 Wilson Boulevard

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Urban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London

2401 Wilson Boulevard General Land Use Plan Amendment Study

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, 2018

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 14, 2011

3.1 Existing Built Form

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Clarendon Boulevard Conference Rooms C & D Arlington, VA 22201

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

880 P Street, NW CityMarket at O Phase 2 West Apartments

A APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015

City Council Agenda Item #14_ Meeting of Oct. 8, Concept plan for Marsh Run Two Redevelopment at and Wayzata Blvd.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

S I T E P L A N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E M E E T I N G A G E N D A

DEC Kinney III Korman. Margaret Tulloch Rhodes Arlington County CPHD

TOWNHOUSE. TYPICAL UNIT SIZE 1,200 to 1,600 square foot average unit (two to three stories) DENSITY dwelling units/acre without cottages

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

EXHIBIT D. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION For. TOWNSEND VILLAGE PUD December 23, 2015 (Revised)

Project: Address: MAJOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW

Washington Boulevard + Kirkwood Road Special General Land Use Plan (GLUP) Study "Plus"

Housing Issues Report Shoreline Towers Inc. Proposal 2313 & 2323 Lake Shore Boulevard West. Prepared by PMG Planning Consultants November 18, 2014

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT CODEAU BUILDING LTD RIDEAU STREET OTTAWA DECEMBER 2013

Thank you and best regards. Tad Lunger, Esq.

City of Lafayette Staff Report Design Review Commission

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

S I T E P L A N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E M E E T I N G A G E N D A

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D

ARTICLE C. ZONING TEXT, DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS AND BOUNDARIES

FIREHOUSE ROW WH / CIN / OH

566 Hilson Ave & 148 Clare St., Ottawa Planning Rationale June 20 th, 2014 Prepared by Rosaline J. Hill, B.E.S., B.Arch., O.A.A.

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 22, 2018

Table of Contents. Concept Plan Overview. Statement of Compliance with Design Guidelines. Statement of Compliance with Comprehensive Plan

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 18, 2017

Dear County Board Members, June, 15, 2016

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.

FOR SALE > MULTIFAMILY/COMMERCIAL REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

September 24, Ashley Cauley Senior Planner City of Minnetonka Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55345

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

3001 & 3003 Washington Boulevard are among the most sought-after new trophy office buildings in the nation s capital. The buildings critically

Planning Application 16/4008/F Rockwell 771 units off Anchor and Hope Lane SE7

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

Realizing Rosslyn: a new era of opportunity GOODY CLANCY WITH KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES RHODESIDE & HARWELL FARR ASSOCIATES W-ZHA

Shillelagh Property CITY COUNCIL PACKAGE FOR SEPTEMBER 16, 2014

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

Survey of Approaches to Achieve the County s Affordable Housing Goals in Planning Processes

RM-11 and RM-11N Districts Schedule

Urban Design Brief 6233, 6237, 6241 and 6245 Main Street, Stouffville Pace Savings and Credit Union June 15, 2012

Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara. Location 3736 & 3744 Shore Drive GPINs & Site Size 24,288 square feet AICUZ Less than 65 db DNL

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-7.5 Residential to Conditional A-18 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Infill & Other Residential Design Review

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Paul VI Redevelopment

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Clarendon Boulevard Conference Room 109/110 (C&D) Lobby Level Arlington, VA 22201

Plan Dutch Village Road

There is no Communal Open Space (COS) requirement for condominium developments.

COMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA NOVEMBER 1, 2016, 2016 MEETING

History of Broadview Avenue

Old Neighborhoods and Housing Provide New Models for the Future.

Housing Conservation District Advisory Group

1.1. SCHEDULE OF USES 1.2. SPECIAL DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Arlington Partnership for Affordable Housing. Queens Court SPRC #1 October 17, 2016

LIN AVE The applicant is proposing to construct a four-unit Lot A R.P

Residential construction single-family and multifamily continues at a

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

College Avenue. Sowers Street. Calder Way. Beaver Avenue

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Rigoberto Calocarivas, Multicultural Institute, 1920 Seventh St., Berkeley, CA 94710

Smith Property Holdings Buchanan House, LLC. Nan Terpak, Agent/Attorney 2200 Clarendon Boulevard, 13th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22201

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapters and Sections

Introduction. General Development Standards

25 St. Dennis Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

R o s s l y n, A r l i n g t o n C o u n t y, V i r g i n i a. S i t e P l a n R e v i e w C o m m i t t e e M e e t i n g # 2

Transcription:

Victoria at Ballston Homeowners Association February 20, 2017 Arlington County Long Range Planning Committee 2100 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 700 Arlington, VA 22201 VIA EMAIL: afusarelli@arlingtonva.us RE: 11 th and Vermont Streets Special General Land Use Plan Study Dear Mr. Fusarelli and Members of the Long Range Planning Committee: We are writing on behalf of the Victoria at Ballston Homeowners Association (VBHA) to express concerns with the proposed development at 11 th and Vermont Streets. VBHA is comprised of 14 townhomes on the corner of 11 th and Utah Streets. If you read through the Ballston Virginia Square Neighborhood Conservation Program (1984) you will find multiple pictures of VBHA, which were then newly built homes. We are a combination of owner occupied and rented units. Our homes are relatively small two story, two bedroom units. First, we are opposed to a change in the General Land Use Plan (GLUP) to allow the proposed development of townhomes and a multi-unit dwelling on what is now church property. All of our owners, including two new owners within the past year, relied upon the current land use in choosing to purchase their property. The proposed change to the GLUP would have an adverse material impact on our homes: loss of sunlight, loss of openness, loss of already scant green space, and a devolution of general neighborhood aesthetics (more fully described below) as well as an increase in the number of cars in the area that the street closure at the end of Utah intended to minimize. Residents reasonably relied on a lonstanding land use plan that would not allow these conditions to occur and to preserve VBHA home values. In short, it is unfair to VBHA owners to now change the area as proposed. Second, VBHA is concerned that the changes proposed at community meetings do not provide for an appropriate transition from the south to the north of 11 th Street if the proposed GLUP designation or the proposed zoning is approved. The Development and Growth Goal 4 in the GLUP states Preserve and enhance existing single-family and apartment neighborhoods. Within Metro Station Areas, land use densities are concentrated near the Metro Station, tapering down to surrounding residential areas to limit the impacts of high-density development. Throughout the County, the Neighborhood Conservation Program and other community improvement programs help preserve and enhance older residential areas and help provide housing at a range of price levels and densities. Neighborhood Preservation Guideline 1

8 of the Ballston Sector Plan (1980) states that Higher density commercial and residential projects adjacent to low-rise residential areas should include effective transition through the use of plant materials, tapering of building heights, balconies, open space, topography, walls and fencing. And further in describing the GLUP, the Ballston Sector Plan explains [t]he high medium area along Fairfax Drive should be planned and buildings situated to achieve a transition into the lower density areas immediately to the north. The Sector plan goes on to explain that [t]he Rl5-30T district would be appropriate for the [south side of 11 th Street]. It would allow townhouse infill and selective preservation of well maintained dwellings, and thereby reinforce the preservation planned for the area immediately north of 11th Street. (emphasis added). VBHA is a low-rise residential area that, until now, has been located across the street from a one story single family home with a full size grass yard. The adjacent church has provided green space for our residents and those of neighboring homeowners associations to greet each other and walk their dogs in the morning. (See Attachment 1 Photos). VBHA residents purchased their homes with an appropriate expectation that the GLUP would continue to be enforced. In the blocks East and West of the proposed development site along 11 th Street, other multistory buildings have significant landscaping space facing north and are tapered such that the lower levels have one or two floors and high floors are set back. For context, the single family home associated with the church is set back similar to the first level of the multi-family dwelling across from Utah Street, and only further back does the multi family dwelling go higher than the one level home. (See Attachment 2 Photos). East of Taylor Street, the homes located on the south side of 11 th street facing north complement the height and landscaping of the north side of the street such that taller townhomes on the south side indicate green space or taller townhomes on the north side. Brick or stone walls are used only where there is a single family home with a yard or other open or grassy space on the opposite site. (See Attachment 3 Photos.) The units in the building on the south side of the street are set back with patios, yards and balconies which create a buffer. In this regard, VBHA is concerned that what NVR is proposing will not provide for an appropriate transition. Although we understand it is early in the process and your committee is not reviewing a particular plan, the NVR conceptual program is for a multi-family residential project (spanning multiple properties across 11 th Street North) comprising a 7 story tower on the southernmost portion of the site, with four story townhomes flanking each side of 11 th Street. Based on preliminary drawings NVR shared with the community, it is disturbing to see the front façade of all brick, without balconies/patios or other architectural relief as a buffer, and without any green space, which would effectively create a dark dense wall along the length of the street. Changing the zoning district to allow taller building heights and greater density affording a developer the opportunity to fill the area with greater density townhomes and multi-family units without requiring the transition describe in the Ballston Site Plan and 2

executed elsewhere along 11 th Street would change the character of the neighborhood along 11 th Street, and result in a loss of outdoor space that is needed to ensure the quality of life of our residents and ensure our homes retain their value. While we are not opposed to the townhouse infill contemplated by the Ballston Sector Plan, we are concerned that over time the understanding of what that means has changed, and we urge you to promote townhouse infill along 11 th Street that is consistent with the surrounding area. Townhouses built in the 1980s had small yards with abundant landscaping in front of the houses, and breaks in the structures for walkways through the properties creating a path to walk to the metro from surrounding areas. To change the concept of townhouse infill and place higher density homes without green space, without landscaping along 11 th Street, with with no break in the block would place an undue burden on the residents to the North. Multiple residents of the higher density areas along Fairfax Boulevard walk their dogs along 11 th Street and use the small patches of grass as if it were a public park. The combination of removing the church yard with building higher density externalizes the cost of the new residents pets and will result in more owners along 11 th Street removing grassy areas because it is almost impossible to maintain healthy grass under these conditions. In short, higher density buildings without appropriate transition, including building townhomes without open green space, would undermine the goal of preserving the older residences in this neighborhood. We oppose any change to the GLUP. And we urge you to not approve any change to the GLUP inconsistent with the Ballston Sector Plan. At a minimum, we hope that as you review the modeling in connection with NVR s Special General Land Use Plan request, that you make sure the models provide for sufficient transition and tapering in the form of set backs, balconies, open space and plant materials consistent with other 11 th Street blocks. We urge you not to recommend a change to the General Land Use Plan that puts those in jeopardy. Thank you in advance for your consideration of our concerns. Victoria at Ballston Homeowners Association Board of Directors Kristine Kassekert Tyler Wilson Ryan Powell 3

Attachment 1: Current Green Space on Church Property 4

Attachment 2: Height of Buildings Next Block East from Proposed Development In this picture, taken facing East on 11 th Street from Vermont, note that the house on the right is set back from the street almost even with the set back of the condominium complex located between Utah and Taylor Streets. Also note the relative height the first level of the house is approximately the same height as the bottom tier of the condominium. This photo is taken West facing from the corner of Taylor and 11 th Streets showing the building located between Utah and Taylor Streets. The significant set back is filled with landscaping at the sidewalk level. At each level facing 11 th Street there is also a balcony. 5

Attachment 3: Structures on the South Side of 11 th Street Complement the North Side Between North Taylor and Stuart Streets South Side of 11 th Street between North Taylor and Stuart Streets. Patios on the ground floor, balconies on the upper floors attached the three-story townhomes, interspaced with landscaping line the sidewalk. (West facing view). The North side of 11 th Street on this block is an open space with some utilities and parking. The lesser set back on the South side is complemented by the open space across the street. 6

Between Stuart and Stafford Streets Looking east, the South side of 11 th Street has developed with four-story townhomes which complement the North side of 11 th Street with three story townhomes. Note the small yard on the South side and significant landscaped space on both sides (detailed in photos below). 7

Between Stafford and Randolph Streets West facing view of South side of 11 th Street. The brick enclosed patios hid set back homes, and complement the opposite site of the street in the photo below which is a single family home deeply set back with a full yard. 8