South Burlington Land Trust

Similar documents
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC HEARING (rev. March, 2016)

Land Trust of Santa Cruz County. Strategic Plan. July 2012 to June This is a public version of a more detailed internal plan.

protect your place Guide to Understanding Conservation Easements

FARMLAND AMENITY PROTECTION. A Brief Guide To Conservation Easements

MITIGATION POLICY FOR DISTRICT-PROTECTED LANDS

PROJECT SCORING GUIDANCE. Introduction: National Proiect Selection:

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

Exploring Ecosystem Services on State Trust Lands in the West

Nova Scotia Community Lands Trust Discussion Paper. Approaches to Enable Community Participation In the Purchase of Land

Rule 80. Preservation of Primary Agricultural Soils Revised and approved by the Land Use Panel during its public meeting on January 31, 2006.

HHLT Educational Forum: Conservation Subdivisions and the Open Space Overlay. February 5th 2018 Winter Hill

Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Acquisition Selection for the Colorado Wildlife Habitat Protection Program

OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION. Reflections on the Value of Acquiring Property for Preservation Purposes

About Conservation Easements

Palmerton Area Comprehensive Plan

Conservation Easement Stewardship

1. Future Land Use FLU6.6.8 Land uses within the Rural Service Area portion of the Wekiva Study Area shall be limited to very low and low intensity

Kent Land Trust Strategic Reassessment Project Final Report

Siskiyou Land Trust. Strategic Plan Update

ARTICLE XI - CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS

Columbia Land Trust is seeking a Conservation Lead to join its passionate team!

SPECIFIC RESPONSES TO AREA COMMISSION OPPOSITION :

GWINNETT COUNTY CSO CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS

Central Pennsylvania Conservancy Project Selection Criteria Form

Conservation Easements: Creating a Conservation Legacy for Private Property

Interpretation of Conservation Purpose INTERNAL REVENUE GUIDANCE AS TO WHAT CONSTITUES A CONSERVATION PURPOSE

Staying Connected in the Northern Appalachians

WYOMING COUNTY PURCHASE OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (PDR) PROGRAM. NYS Farmland Protection Implementation Grants (FPIG) PRE-APPLICATION

The Farmland Preservation Program in Sussex County

TOWN OF MIDDLEBOROUGH COMMUNITY PRESERVATION PLAN

IRS FORM 8283 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT DONATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT

PRESS RELEASE 4/9/2014 CONTACT: Joan Weir, SE Regional Director, Vermont Land Trust ,

Conservancy Mission. Leveraging GIS Technologies in Chesapeake Conservation and Restoration 10/17/2018

CZMP Workshop Preserving Your Community & The Environment From Development Impacts

Georgia Conservation Tax Credit Program Frequently Asked Questions

[First Reprint] SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED SEPTEMBER 17, 2018

Open Space Model Ordinance

Wetland Mitigation Bank Settlement Agreement Fact Sheet

PENINSULA TOWNSHIP DONATION of DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ORDINANCE (DDR, No. 45)

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION ACT Town of Hatfield OPEN SPACE PROJECT GUIDELINES

Using Easements to Conserve Biodiversity. Jeff Lerner Defenders of Wildlife

Land Conservation Acreage Milestones

Implementation Tools for Local Government

Summary of Key Issues from Skagit County TDR Focus Group Meetings January 7, 2014

TRENDS IN QUALIFIED CONSERVATION EASEMENTS. By: Melinda M. Beck, Esq.

American Tree Farm System Eligibility Requirements and Guidance for Certification

Protecting Land Outside Protected Areas in Kenya. Kathleen H. Fitzgerald Director Land Conservation African Wildlife Foundation

DESCRIPTION OF A LAND TRUST

Climate Change and Conservation Easement Clause Databank

Guidelines for Construction of Recreational Buildings and Improvements Greater than 1000 Square Feet Outside Acceptable Development Areas

Section SKETCH PLAN REVIEW

Open Space. Introduction. Vision. Defining Open Space. Midway City 2017 General Plan

Neds Corner Station. What is a Conservation Covenant?

Town of Falmouth s Four Step Design Process for Subdivisions in the Resource Conservation Zoning Overlay District

Conservation Design Subdivisions

2026 Campus Plan. September 19, 2016

City of Winnipeg Housing Policy Implementation Plan

West Virginia Outdoor Heritage Conservation Fund. Grant Program TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE MANUAL

Crestone Baca Comprehensive Plan Background Issues Report

Sample Baseline Documentation Report (BDR) Annotated Template for Environmentally Important Land

Private Land Conservation: Conservation Easements. Matt Singer Land Stewardship Manager

Land Use. Land Use Categories. Chart 5.1. Nepeuskun Existing Land Use Inventory. Overview

Action that Benefits All

NANTUCKET ISLANDS LAND BANK AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY Adopted by the vote of the Land Bank Commission on November 10, 2015

Easement Program Guidelines for Locating Towers and Communication Devices

ARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL ARRANGEMENTS THAT CREATE OPEN SPACE. Lisa Blake Ava Goodale Caroline Krassen Johnathan Licitra Elizabeth Ochoa

New Brunswick Community Land Trust

Draft Zoning Changes for the 2nd Planning Board Public Hearing, January 22, 2018.

FINAL DRAFT 12/1/16, Rev. to 7/18/17

Link Housing s Tenant Engagement and Community Development Strategy FormingLinks

SECTION 16. "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT

APPENDIX B. Fee Simple v. Conservation Easement Acquisitions NTCOG Water Quality Greenprint - Training Workshops

CHAPTER 12. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

Capital Regional District. Regional Parks Land Acquisition Strategy 2015 to 2017

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

Biodiversity Planning Policy and Guidelines for (LEP) Rezoning Proposals

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (RFI) LAND DEVELOPMENT LARRIMAC GOLF AND TENNIS CLUB, CHELSEA QUEBEC

Application Procedures for Easements or Rights of Way on City of Fort Collins Natural Areas and Conserved Lands March 2012

OPEN SPACE & RECREATION PLAN

OPEN SPACE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (OSRD) MODEL SITE PLAN BYLAW

THE FAIRFIELD COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP 4/18/2014 DRAFT STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN

Resource Protection Area Map Update - Frequently Asked Questions

Article 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 17, 2017

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Porter. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

Auckland Council Rates Remission and Postponement Policy Consultation Submission

Spirit Lake North, LLC

A. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan.

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L Work Plan

2011 AICP Review Course

Chapter VIII. Conservation Easements: Valuing Property Subject to a Qualified Conservation Contribution

BROCHURE # 37 OPEN SPACE

Attachment A First Submittal JAZB Safety Zones A and B

REVIEWED BY: Administrator Counsel Program Mgr. (Name): Board Committee Engineer Other

15 July Ms E Young Team Leader Protected Area Establishment Department of Environment and Natural Resources Adelaide

Farmland and Open Space Preservation Purchase of Development Rights Program Frequently Asked Questions

Some Points Re Perpetuity - Code and Regulations

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Transcription:

South Burlington Land Trust dedicated to preserving South Burlington s forests, wetlands, farmlands and other natural areas through landowner preservation agreements and other conservation vehicles to maintain city residents high quality of life. University of Vermont Campus Planning Services 109 South Prospect Street Burlington, Vermont 05405 Attention: Director, Linda Seavey The South Burlington Land Trust is submitting this position document to the University of Vermont s Campus Planning Services in response to the RFP issued by the University of Vermont on June 20, 2017 for development proposals for the Edlund South Tract and Martin Tract in South Burlington, Vermont. Board of Directors President Sarah Dopp Treasurer Michael Mittag Secretary Karen Ryder Rosanne Greco Sophie Quest Elizabeth Milizia Allan Strong Penne Tompkins Conservation not Development This is not a proposal to purchase and develop. This is a proposal to conserve the Edlund South and Martin tracts in their current natural state. Here, we outline why we believe these properties would be better off maintained in a conserved state, rather than selling them for development. Who is the South Burlington Land Trust? The South Burlington Land Trust (SBLT) is an entirely volunteer conservation organization whose mission entails the retention of undeveloped lands and agricultural lands in South Burlington for their natural resource values, support of the South Burlington Open Space strategy, collaboration with other conservation organizations to procure land and easements, and support of agricultural activities in the city of South Burlington. We also work with adjoining towns to pursue these objectives. The University of Vermont s Environmental Commitment The University of Vermont s commitment to the environment is demonstrated in myriad arenas. On June 6, 2017, in response to U.S. President Donald Trump s decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Accord, UVM President Thomas Sullivan reiterated UVM s commitment to the university s vision statement To be among the nation s premier small research universities, preeminent in our comprehensive commitment to liberal education, environment, health, and public service. Sullivan further noted Our commitment to the environment is a key element in this declarative statement. That commitment remains fully intact and as strong as ever. South Burlington Land Trust Inc. is a 501 (c) (3) non profit organization: tax ID # 75-3133866. 500 Cheese Factory Rd., South Burlington VT 05403

Page 2 Further, UVM has recently been awarded a STARS (Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating System for higher education) Gold Rating for its Sustainability Efforts. The work that UVM has done has placed the university in the top 12 percent of all rated institutions. Importantly, one of the components of the STAR ranking system is Participatory Governance. In their most recent report, UVM notes Campus Planning Services prides itself in promoting collaborative processes to ensure diverse perspectives are considered in all of its planning efforts to ultimately meet the needs and be in the best interests of the University. Although only a small component of the ranking system, this statement does not align with the criteria set forth in this RFP, as there was little vetting of the RFP in the community. Additionally, in 2007 UVM signed on as a Charter Signatory of the Presidents Climate Commitment. The University s Climate Action Plan (2010) calls for the use of certified renewable power or carbon offsets by 2015 (accomplished) and for carbon neutrality by 2025. The sale of a forested property for a housing development is contradictory to a goal of carbon neutrality. Finally, UVM has recently included sustainability as one of the University s General Education Requirements. One criterion for courses to be designated as SU is to illustrate personal responsibility: Students, as members of society, can recognize and assess how sustainability impacts their lives and how their actions impact sustainability. Given the groundbreaking work that has been conducted at the Gund Institute for the Environment around a more holistic approach to economic sustainability, this RFP is in contrast to the values that UVM aims to impart on its students. The Gund Institute for the Environment has a long and decorated history of quantifying the true costs of economic development by taking into account the impacts on ecosystem services. Ecosystem services, those goods and services that are provided for free by nature, are typically discounted when we look at the short-term economic gains that are accrued when we harvest our natural resources. The Edlund South and Martin tracts perform a variety of ecosystem services that will not be accounted for in the sales of these properties. Carbon sequestration by the forests, watershed protection (of impaired Potash Brook), biodiversity conservation, and cultural values of education, recreation, and open space conservation are just a few. If UVM were to do a true accounting of the value of these ecosystem services, the sale price of these tracts would not equal the value of these services. This is particularly true when you consider that these ecosystem services would continue to generate benefits indefinitely if the properties were to be conserved. UVM s stellar environmental record and commitment is clearly at odds with the short-term economic gains that would be generated by divesting the university of these natural areas for residential development.

Page 3 Below we outline some of the salient issues with the RFP, as well as our vision for a more sustainable and collaborative approach to land use in the community. Negative Consequences South Burlington s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning have been developed with significant public participation and input. Public surveys and opinion polls have shown that South Burlington residents strongly support the conservation of open space and forest habitat. Concerns about the negative impacts of development on these lands, both in South Burlington and the broader community, have informed the position of the South Burlington Land Trust as to the value of conserving them, and are as follows: The Edlund South parcel is part of an important watershed that would be permanently damaged by development. Residential development would add significant impervious surface area and increased storm water runoff in South Burlington. The steeply sloped land will direct runoff from any new developed impervious surfaces into the impaired waterway (Potash Brook), which traverses the land. These tracts and adjacent lands provide ecological integrity, biodiversity, and a nexus for wildlife habitat connectivity by linking UVM open lands, the Fairholt Estate, the wildlife corridor adjacent to I-189, UVM s East Woods Natural Area and the Wheelock property woods. Development of these properties would sever this connectivity and increase fragmentation of the area. The Edlund South parcel is zoned as Agricultural Institutional, not for residential development (zoning is defined in Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan, as part of South Burlington's continuous city and land planning.) Development would cause degradation of unique geological features of the land (sand dunes from Champlain Sea in the Pleistocene Period) Based on the topography of the tracts, new access points would be placed in close proximity to a recognized dangerous intersection (Swift and Spear Streets) where additional traffic would increase the danger of current conditions. Our primary conclusion, after all considerations, is that these properties should remain in their natural state, undisturbed. An Alternative Vision SBLT believes that the best option to UVM retaining these parcels would be to develop a collaborative plan that allows the City of South Burlington to acquire the properties for natural resource use or nature park purposes.

Page 4 The South Burlington Land Trust has experience in developing alternate solutions for open space, one example of which is a project in which we participated in to protect the lands of the former LeDuc farm (now Bread and Butter Farm) on Cheese Factory Road. Our approach was to work with the family initially to bring them to the conservation decision and to collaborate with the Town of Shelburne, the Vermont Land Trust and others to move the project forward, and finally to help raise money for the project. Bread and Butter Farm is now thriving and is a great success story. Although SBLT is an entirely volunteer organization with limited funds, it has nonetheless been successful through grassroots organizing and local networking in bringing conservation partners together to accomplish land conservation in South Burlington. The SBLT, upon learning about the RFP, in accordance with our customary way of working, reached out immediately to conservation partners (Vermont Land Trust, Trust for Public Land, Vermont Natural Resources Council) concerning these lands. These parties as well as SBLT are all in agreement that the timetable presented in the RFP (two months) is far too short for a dialogue or collaborative plan to take shape. Furthermore, these organizations typically derive major financial support from the state funded Vermont Housing and Conservation Board in making conservation possible. This is appropriate in acquiring land from individuals or on behalf of municipalities, but may not be appropriate in the case of ownership by another state entity, in this case the University of Vermont. What the SBLT wishes had happened, and could still happen, if the process could be slowed down to allow full discussion of alternatives, would be for UVM Campus Planning Services to meet with Planning and Zoning officials in South Burlington to explore options for the City to acquire these lands for public purposes. Examples of public uses might include the establishment of a Town Forest, a nature park with trails linking the north side of the adjoining property at 150 Swift Street (which is currently under development review), to the UVM East Woods Natural Area, establishment of a municipal-owned area which supports educational programs for South Burlington schools, Recreation and Parks, or an independent nature-based nonprofit organization. Many other creative ideas could be generated to meet South Burlington City goals and UVM s stated Conservation and Sustainability goals. While the SBLT believes in preserving both parcels as open space natural areas, we acknowledge and recognize that the smaller Martin tract is currently zoned for residential purposes and therefore can be developed should a proposal for its purchase be proffered. In this case, it is our hope that such a development would be sensitively positioned, so as not to disturb the natural areas that make up part of the Martin tract.

Page 5 Conclusion Conservation of the Edlund South and Martin tracts would be a win-win for UVM and the community. It would showcase UVM s environmental mission, support the goals of the people of South Burlington and conserve the ecosystem services of these properties for future generations.