HOUSING SUPPLY IN OECD COUNTRIES: RESPONSIVENESS AND ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES Christophe André OECD Economics Department Workshop Macroeconomic Implications of Housing Markets 30 November 2016 European Commission, Brussels The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and not of the OECD or of its member countries. Copyright rests with the author, 2016. All rights reserved
Outline of the presentation Responsiveness of housing supply across OECD countries Housing supply developments in selected countries Variation in supply elasticity within countries Economic consequences of supply rigidities Housing supply determinants
Price responsiveness of housing supply Long-run price-elasticity of new housing supply 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Source: Caldera Sánchez and Johansson (2011).
Elasticity of new supply and housing price volatility Volatility of housing prices 1 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 NLD CHE ITA ESP NOR GBR AUS BEL FRA IRL NZL FIN DNK CAN SWE y = -0.17x + 2.21 R² = 0.02 1.0 DEU JPN USA 0.5 0.0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Long-run price-elasticity of new housing supply 2 1. Standard deviation of quarterly changes in real housing prices (1980:1-2016:2). 2. Estimates from Caldera Sánchez and Johansson (2011).
Residential investment in selected countries (1) Index, 1995=100 450 Germany 400 350 300 Spain United Kingdom Ireland Netherlands 250 200 150 100 50 0 Source: OECD Economic Outlook database.
Residential investment in selected countries (2) Index, 1995=100 250 200 Australia Canada United States 150 100 50 0 Source: OECD Economic Outlook database.
UK: Local Authorities construction has not been replaced Permanent dwellings completed 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 Local Authorities Housing Associations Private Enterprise 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 Source: Communities and Local Government Live Table 241.
Source: Statistics Sweden. Sweden: Construction lags behind population growth
How did Korea cut its housing shortage? Acute shortage of housing in 1990: supply ratio (dwellings/households) around 72%. Two Million Housing Construction Plan (1988). Residential sites developed by the public sector, construction by the private sector. Pre-sale + Guarantee (KHGC) system. The dwelling stock increased by more than 50% between 1990 and 2000. The supply ratio was over 100% by 2002. Stabilisation of housing prices. Note: Population density in Korea is nearly twice as high as in the UK.
Housing prices and investment in Korea 2000 = 100 250 Real housing prices Real residential investment 200 150 100 50 0 Source: OECD Economic Outlook database and OECD Analytical House Price database.
Supply elasticities vary widely within countries Saiz (2010): From 0.6 (Miami,FL) to 5.45 (Wichita,KS) in US MSAs with population> 500,000. Oikarinen et al. (2015): From 0.2 (Helsinki) to 0.8 (Rovaniemi) in Finland s 15 largest cities. IMF (2015): From close to zero up to 3.8 in about 150 Swedish municipalities.
Economic consequences of supply rigidities Housing shortages, low affordability, risk of homelessness, overcrowding, impact on well-being and energy consumption of long commuting times Reduces competitiveness and attractiveness for investors. Hampers labour mobility. Increases the risk of housing price bubbles and financial and macroeconomic instability.
Supply elasticity and housing bubbles Glaeser et al. (2008): More elastic housing supply -> fewer and shorter bubbles, smaller price increases. But welfare consequences may be higher because of overbuilding. But the pre-crisis boom suggests a more complicated pattern, both in the US and Europe. Recent research suggests some explanations for housing price booms in areas with intermediate supply elasticities: Gao et al. (2015): role of information aggregation and learning in housing markets. Nathanson and Zwick (2015): role of speculation in areas with elastic supply, but facing a development constraint in the near future.
Housing supply determinants Natural constraints (Saiz, 2010; Oikarinen, 2015). Regulatory constraints (Zoning and planning, building codes ). Investment taxation and regulations (institutional and buy-to-let). Rental regulations. Infrastructure (transport, schools, health care services ). Financing: credit availability, financial accelerator (Carswell, 2011). Housing price expectations and uncertainty. Strategic behaviour of real estate developers (Laszek and Olszewski, 2015) and interrelations between housing supply agents (Lux and Sunega, 2009).
Price responsiveness of supply and scarcity of land Supply responsiveness 2.5 Correlation coefficient: -0.45** 2.0 Usa 1.5 Swe Can Dnk 1.0 Fin Jpn 0.5 0.0 Nzl Aus Irl Nor Pol Deu Bel Esp Fra Gbr Aut Ita Isr Nld Che 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Population density Source: Caldera Sánchez and Johansson (2011).
Portland Los Angeles Helsinki Stockholm Houston Vienna Washington Dublin San Francisco Miami Marseille Toronto Atlanta Vancouver Copenhagen Chicago Lyon Madrid Frankfurt Berlin Rome Boston Brussels Amsterdam Lille Philadelphia Cologne Paris Turin Rotterdam Valencia Birmingham (UK) Manchester Santiago Dortmund Milan Nagoya New York Liverpool London Athens Fukuoka Naples Osaka Barcelona The Hague Mexico City Tokyo Busan Seoul Incheon Population density in metropolitan areas Persons per km 2 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Note: Based on functional urban areas. Source: OECD Metropolitan areas dataset.
Price responsiveness of supply and land-use regulations Supply responsiveness 2.5 Correlation coefficient: -0.56*** 2 Usa 1.5 1 Fin Can Dnk Swe Jpn 0.5 0 Nzl Irl Esp Gbr Aus Isr Nor Deu Pol Bel Fra Aut Ita Nld Che 0 50 100 150 200 250 Number of days to obtain a building permit Source: Caldera Sánchez and Johansson (2011).
The Governance of Land Use in OECD Countries (forthcoming) (1) Why plan? Externalities, balance between private and public interests, ensure efficient spatial development. Balance multiple objectives -> Planners triangle : economic competitiveness, environmental sustainability, social inclusion. Land-use regulations are highly segmented horizontally and vertically in most countries. Interactions between planning and other policy areas are critical, notably fiscal frameworks and incentives faced by local authorities.
The Governance of Land Use in OECD Countries (forthcoming) (2) Developed land covers less than 10% of the landmass of most OECD countries. Developed land per capita has declined in 12 out of 28 OECD countries between 2000 and 2012. Trade-offs -> The use of less developed land per capita is associated with: Higher per capita GDP growth Lower concentration of air pollutants Higher housing costs
Conclusions Housing supply responsiveness varies widely across and within countries. Excessively rigid housing supply has a number of negative economic and social consequences. The relation between supply elasticities and housing price dynamics is complex. More research on supply-side actors behaviour and financing would be useful. Land-use planning faces important trade-offs between objectives. In many countries land-use governance needs to be strengthened and incentives faced by local authorities reviewed.
THANK YOU!
References Caldera Sánchez, A. and Å. Johansson (2011), The Price Responsiveness of Housing Supply in OECD Countries, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 837. Carswell, S. (2011), Anglo Republic, Inside the Bank that Broke Ireland, Penguin Ireland, Dublin. Gao, Z., M. Sockin and W. Xiong (2015), Learning about the Neighborhood: The Role of Supply Elasticity for Housing Cycles, Working Paper. Glaeser, E., J. Gyourko and A. Saiz (2008), Housing Supply and Housing Bubbles, Journal of Urban Economics, 64. IMF (2015), Sweden: Selected Issues, IMF Country Report, No. 15/330. Laszek, J. and K. Olszewski (2015), The Behaviour of Housing Developers and Aggregate Housing Supply, Narodowy Bank Polski Working Paper, No. 206, Warsaw. Lux, M. and P. Sunega (2010), Interrelations Between Housing Supply Agents: The Metropolitan Housing Market in Prague, Post-Communist Economies, 22:1. Nathanson and Zwick (2015), Arrested Development: Theory and Evidence of Supply-Side Speculation in the Housing Market, mimeo. OECD, The Governance of Land Use in OECD Countries (forthcoming). Oikarinen, E., R. Peltola and E. Valtonen (2015), Regional variation in the elasticity of supply of housing, and its determinants: The case of a small sparsely populated country, Regional Science and Urban Economics 50. Saiz, A. (2010), The geographic determinants of housing supply, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (3).