Q&A September 23, 2011, 9 a.m. NSP III Multi Family Workshop City of Miami, City Hall, Commission Chambers

Similar documents
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Frequently Asked Questions

April 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Performance Report

Guidance on Amendment Procedures Updated April 3, 2014

Genesee County Land Bank Authority

Reviewed and Approved

January 1, 2013 thru March 31, 2013 Performance Report

Neighborhood Stabilization Program

Overview. Five Eligible NSP Uses. Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons

Guidance for Habitat for Humanity Affiliates January 12, 2011

Amendment #2. To the

Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) A Briefing To The Housing Committee November 17, 2008

Kane County Foreclosure Redevelopment Program

NSP Program Overview. Daniel Blanchard COJ Management Consultant

NYS HOME Local Program Small Rental Development Initiative (SRDI) Application Technical Assistance Webinar Questions and Answers

Kane County Foreclosure Redevelopment Program

April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons

July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE AGENT SERVICES FOR NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM

April 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Performance Report

Using NSP to Preserve Affordability. March 22, 2011

July 1, 2018 thru September 30, 2018 Performance Report

CITY OF AURORA. and Neighborhood Stabilization Program

HOME Homeownership Production Application Template Guidance

NSP Substantial Amendment

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

B-11-MN April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report

HOME Application Template Guidance

October 1, 2012 thru December 31, 2012 Performance Report

October 1, 2009 thru December 31, 2009 Performance Report

Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

Developing NSP Projects with Habitat Organizations

Reviewed and Approved

Fannie Mae REO and Neighborhood Stabilization: A Guide for Public Entity and Non- Profit Buyers Foreclosure Recovery: Rebuilding Neighborhoods Joe

Submitted - Await for Review

April 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report

January 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

April 1, 2010 thru June 30, 2010 Performance Report

October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

Introduction & Overview

B-11-MN April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

January 1, 2011 thru March 31, 2011 Performance Report

July 1, 2015 thru September 30, 2015 Performance Report

July 1, 2017 thru September 30, 2017 Performance Report

July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report

NSP 3 Substantial Amendment

NYS HOME Local Program

Genesee County Land Bank Authority

October 1, 2012 thru December 31, 2012 Performance Report

California Tax Credit Allocation Committee Update. Mark Stivers Executive Director

NSP Project Feasibility Analysis Template: Instruction Manual

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY LAND BANK CORPORATION

NSP DEVELOPER ARRESALE PROGRAM PROCEDURES

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

B-08-UN April 1, 2015 thru June 30, 2015 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond Rules

KERN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION


Palm Beach County. Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 Residential Redevelopment Grant Program

April 1, 2010 thru June 30, 2010 Performance Report

April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report

April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report

Updated NOFA - July 3, 2009

Jackson County Home Development Resources, Inc. Neighborhood Stabilization Program Policies and Procedures

When a homeowner loses their house to

B-08-MN October 1, 2015 thru December 31, 2015 Performance. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

July 1, 2009 thru September 30, 2009 Performance Report

REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECT-BASED VOUCHER PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Reviewed and Approved

July 1, 2013 thru September 30, 2013 Performance Report

January 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2015 Performance Report

January 1, 2017 thru March 31, 2017 Performance Report

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI HOMESTEADING AUTHORITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

October 1, 2017 thru December 31, 2017 Performance

April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report

City of Miami Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 (NSP2) Application

INTRODUCTION TO FEDERAL LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDITS. 1. Applicable Percentage

October 1, 2015 thru December 31, 2015 Performance

October 1, 2016 thru December 31, 2016 Performance

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the FY-2016 Rental Production NOFA

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. [Docket No. FR C-02J

NSP Closeout Webinar

Reviewed and Approved


January 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report

Reviewed and Approved

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

Managing NSP2 Programs For Success. Key Success Factors in NSP1. Typical NSP1 Market Strategies. Lessons Learned from NSP1

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS

October 1, 2016 thru December 31, 2016 Performance

B-09-CN-CA April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

UPDATED FINAL 2017 LIHTC QAP Online Application Q & A

October 1, 2013 thru December 31, 2013 Performance Report

October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report

Transcription:

Q&A September 23, 2011, 9 a.m. NSP III Multi Family Workshop City of Miami, City Hall, Commission Chambers Question 1: Is this NSP for a property that is in foreclosure currently or a property that had been in foreclosure and has been acquired? Answer 1: If you acquired the property already and it had been in foreclosure it does not qualify. You have to acquire the property as part of this RFP process. Question 2: What about if you have vacant land? Answer 2: If you currently own vacant land and you want to build on it under strategy E you can as long as it s five units or more. Or you can purchase foreclosed vacant land as part of the RFP process as well. Question 3: To clarify, involving the purchase of the property for this RFP, you would have to alert the lender that they must be willing to wait until the City funds the project, correct? Answer 3: Yes. The purchase contract will require Exhibit F (NSP Contract Rider) and the lender must be willing to accept that your purchase is conditional on that. Please note, funding will be contingent on obtaining environmental clearance from HUD. Question 4: In regards to delineation of the maps included in the RFP, should we go by what s in the application? Answer 4: Use the printed maps as a general idea of the areas that are included as part of this RFP. But for specific street and block delineations, we strongly suggest that look at the census tract behind the maps. Question 5: Can you repeat the three threshold items and how much money is available? Answer 5: There is a $4.103,045 in NSP3 available as part of this RFP and three threshold items are experience, financing and the green components. Question 6: On page 13, you refer to acceptable development fees. Are these triggered by the discount on the property s purchase price? What exactly is the trigger for that benchmark? Answer 6: The amount of Development Fee under Activity 1 is 10% of the Development Cost (Sort and Hard Cost), however, the development fee can increase up to a maximum of 16% depending on percentage of the discount purchase price of the property. This is determined by

the contract price and the current appraised value. Under Activity 2, the maximum development fee is 10%. Question 7: If my client will be purchasing an apartment complex for cash, the City can finance up to 50% of the improvements per this RFP s regulations, but can the City also contribute 50% of the purchase price? Answer 7: Under Activity 1, the NSP funds can be used to for up to 50% of the development cost including the cost of the apartment building. However up to 25% can be used towards the purchase of the property and 25% towards the development costs. Question 8: Is there a project advantage to us putting all of the equity into the project at the time that we re ready to move forward assuming we get City funding? Answer 8: That is up to developer to decide whether they want to do that but no, there is no advantage within the stipulations of this RFP. Question 9: In Section 5 you ask the applicant to submit the last three years of financial statements are you referring to the MASTER entity behind the project, or for all the partner entities behind the project? Answer 9: In the event the applicant is a newly formed single asset entity, we are looking for this information from the principals behind the entity. Question 10: As to the financial statements you are requesting, do you need those when we apply or afterwards, in the event the project is awarded funding? Answer 10: We need those statements included as part of the RFP application. Question 11: Do you have a definition of green components? Answer 11: Please refer to Exhibit D of the RFP. Question 12: Does the City have a specific procedure for that Sec. 3 business certificate? Answer 12: No, the City does not, Miami Dade County does. Question 13: If you have 40 yrs. of construction experience does that count? Answer 13: Yes.

Question 14: If the non profit shares the ownership of the property do you get the extra points for that? Answer 14: Yes. Question 15: Is there a set aside for CHDOs? Answer 15: No. Although as mentioned, there is a possibility that additional monies can come for an approved project from HOME and if you are CHDO the City would consider that CHDO HOME assistance. Question 16: What if we are to develop on vacant land, how would we include that in our total development cost? Answer 16: Under Activity 1, the cost of vacant land purchased from a foreclosed state is included in the development cost and eligible for NSP funding as mentioned in Answer 6 above, Under Activity 2, the cost/value of land can be included as part of your development cost, however it will not be considered when determining the maximum Loan to Cost. Question 17: For non city based experience, how closely does it need to be housing related towards the 20 pt. threshold? Answer 17: That is subjective to the scorer, but we suggest you clearly delineate your organization s experience in relation to the type of housing you are applying for under this RFP. Question 18: If you have a project on track for environmental clearance and you receive it prior to this RFP being funded, would you need an updated environmental clearance (a second one) upon a potential award from this RFP? Answer 18: Yes you would still need an updated environmental clearance Question 19: When you reference City funded project experience does it mean any experience in any City in the U.S.? Answer 19: Yes, in the U.S. and again you should provide documentation proving your company s experience with said City. Question 20: We have an existing building identified at this point for this RFP, does it has to be bank owned in order to qualify for this RFP?

Answer 20: It can presently be in the foreclosure process and you ultimately have to buy it from the foreclosure entity. Or it can be a short sale so far as the foreclosure process has already started. Question 21: What about abandoned buildings, do they qualify for this RFP? Answer 21: They qualify. Please look for the definition of abandoned in the RFP. Question 22: As to audited financials, we have a dozen single asset entities that are audited annually but we have no umbrella entities, what would we do to meet this RFP specification? Answer 22: In this case, we would look towards the principles of this new single asset entity and you should provided financials for them. Question 23: Are all lenders eligible for this process? Answer 23: Any lender can provide a commitment. If it s an FDIC insured lender we have no problem with that. If we have a company that no one has heard of, then we need proof that that lender has the ability to fund the commitment. Question 24: Is there a total percentage of the project value that is NSP funded? Answer 24: The RFP allows for a maximum of 50% of NSP funding in any given project, but we are able to go up to 75% with other funding sources if these are available, but please note that any additional funding sources will make a difference in the rental structure of your buildings. Question 25: Item I mention that the proposer must have 6 years of rehabilitation experience, how do you define proposer? Answer 25: Your development team, principles, etc., are your proposers. Question 26: Concerning joint ventures, can the company that has the experience of six years or more be the one that takes the lead on the experience requirement? Answer 26: Yes. Question 27: Regarding the 30 year covenant, does that mean the property cannot be sold? Answer 27: The property can be sold but it will have that 30 year restriction on it for the remaining time period. Question 28: The City award is going to be presented as a loan, correct?

Answer 28: Yes, it is a deferred payment loan. Question 29: After the proposals are submitted what is the turnaround time for the review and award? Answer 29: A Committee will get together to review and score them, then there s an appeals process that is upheld. So we approximate this RFP to be reviewed and awarded 90 120 days from this time. Our goal is to have the awards made by year s end. Question 30: Under what conditions can a for profit entity have a loan forgiven? Answer 30: If you keep it within the 30 year affordability period, and it s compliant during that time, it is possible.