Managing NSP2 Programs For Success. Key Success Factors in NSP1. Typical NSP1 Market Strategies. Lessons Learned from NSP1

Similar documents
Neighborhood Stabilization Program

Disposition Strategies

July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report

Guidance for Habitat for Humanity Affiliates January 12, 2011

NSP Rental Basics: A Primer on Using Rental Projects to Meet NSP Obligation and 25% Set-Aside Requirement. About this Tool

B-08-MN April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

April 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Performance Report

Overview. Five Eligible NSP Uses. Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons

January 1, 2013 thru March 31, 2013 Performance Report

Reviewed and Approved

January 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2015 Performance Report

April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report

Developing NSP Projects with Habitat Organizations

Lease-purchase and NSP

October 1, 2012 thru December 31, 2012 Performance Report

NSP Spring Cleaning. Documenting Compliance For Closeout. May 29, 2018

NSP Closeout Webinar

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons

Introduction & Overview

B-08-UN April 1, 2015 thru June 30, 2015 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

July 1, 2017 thru September 30, 2017 Performance Report

Reviewed and Approved

January 1, 2017 thru March 31, 2017 Performance Report

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

Reviewed and Approved

April 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Performance Report

Scattered Site Rental Management

April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report

January 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report

B-08-MN October 1, 2015 thru December 31, 2015 Performance. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

Guidance on Amendment Procedures Updated April 3, 2014

October 1, 2016 thru December 31, 2016 Performance

October 1, 2017 thru December 31, 2017 Performance

Amendment #2. To the

July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report

January 1, 2017 thru March 31, 2017 Performance Report

NSP Project Feasibility Analysis Template: Instruction Manual

January 1, 2014 thru March 31, 2014 Performance Report

Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) A Briefing To The Housing Committee November 17, 2008

April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report

October 1, 2011 thru December 31, 2011 Performance Report

Neighborhood Stabilization Program Closeout Checklist

Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report

October 1, 2012 thru December 31, 2012 Performance Report

July 1, 2013 thru September 30, 2013 Performance Report

Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report

Apr 1, 2015 thru Jun 30, 2015 Performance Report

April 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report

Reviewed and Approved

Foreclosures Part 2:

Reviewed and Approved

April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

January 1, 2011 thru March 31, 2011 Performance Report

MFA Relocation Policies and Procedures

January 1, 2010 thru March 31, 2010 Performance Report

Property Donation Program

October 1, 2009 thru December 31, 2009 Performance Report

October 1, 2016 thru December 31, 2016 Performance

October 1, 2012 thru December 31, 2012 Performance Report

July 1, 2018 thru September 30, 2018 Performance Report

Differences, Procurement and

NSP Program Overview. Daniel Blanchard COJ Management Consultant

January 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2015 Performance Report

Neighborhood Stabilization Program Frequently Asked Questions

October 1, 2015 thru December 31, 2015 Performance

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

NSP DEVELOPER ARRESALE PROGRAM PROCEDURES

HUD NSP Policy Alerts

October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report

July 1, 2014 thru September 30, 2014 Performance Report

B-08-UN October 1, 2015 thru December 31, 2015 Performance. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

CITY OF AURORA. and Neighborhood Stabilization Program

Reviewed and Approved

Target Neighborhood: Fort Lupton 2 Neighborhood ID:

Jackson County Home Development Resources, Inc. Neighborhood Stabilization Program Policies and Procedures

October 1, 2016 thru December 31, 2016 Performance

Reviewed and Approved

Reviewed and Approved

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

B-11-MN April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

City of Bradenton. Proposed Neighborhood Stabilization Program Plan Revised as of

October 1, 2011 thru December 31, 2011 Performance Report

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY LAND BANK CORPORATION

B-08-MN April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

July 1, 2018 thru September 30, 2018 Performance Report

October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report

Reviewed and Approved

and NSP 5/4/2011 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report

October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report

July 1, 2015 thru September 30, 2015 Performance Report

July 1, 2009 thru September 30, 2009 Performance Report

B-11-MN April 1, 2015 thru June 30, 2015 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

NSP - How Can Counties Recover from The Malaise of Homeowner Foreclosures June 16, Working Together for Stronger Communities

Transcription:

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Managing NSP2 Programs For Success Lessons Learned from NSP1 Neighborhood Stabilization Neighborhood Program 2 Stabilization Program 2 Key Success Factors in NSP1 1. Strategies/acquisitions based on market data 2. Sufficient staff with NSP & real estate knowledge Grantees, subrecipients, developers, contractors 3. Appropriate and comprehensive funding agreements 4. Full understanding of NSP eligible property types and acquisition steps 5. Solid plans for meeting 25% set-aside 6. Realistic approach to marketing and selling homes 7. Diligent grant management & good communications Typical NSP1 Market Strategies Tightly targeted redevelopment - blighted areas Addressing vacant properties & foreclosures with rehab, new construction, demolition and land banking Bedroom suburbs with scattered foreclosures Rescuing failed new subdivisions Preservation of affordable rental properties For VLI families and special populations Areas likely to rebound as hot markets Foreclosed homes captured for long-term affordability U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 1

Importance of Market Data What and where to acquire are key NSP decisions Of course, driven by your NSP2 plan Still, finding the right properties has been challenging Fresh market data can make all the difference It s often worth paying for proprietary data Public and utility company records can be crucial More data needed for micro-area redevelopment Crime rates, demo-only candidates, infrastructure needs Management/Staffing Strategies Grantee level Maximize adaptation of CDBG/HOME programs Assign experienced staff in key positions, and contract for services to fill gaps Developer/sub-recipient level Single family real estate development skills are essential Light HOME/CDBG experience calls for a crash course Step-by-step program manuals and training are crucial for smooth operations and NSP compliance Admin Vs. Program Delivery First-timers with NSP often need to sort this out The 10% limit on admin costs doesn t apply to program delivery Examples of program delivery costs Acquisition, design, project management and inspection work on specific properties Marketing properties and qualifying clients Providing financial assistance to homebuyers U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 2

Agreements With Partners This has been challenging with NSP1 Scopes, budgets and flow-through requirements are often not complete enough Developer category is breaking new ground Help is on the way! NSP technical assistance teams are creating programs in a box with many sample documents Referencing a complete program manual can make the agreements much shorter and simpler templates are being created as we speak Types of Agreements Subrecipient agreements Typically used for nonprofits providing services No developer fees. Program income/audit rules apply Developer agreements and loan agreements Most suitable with for-profit and nonprofit developers that have the requisite experience Contracts Required for services like appraisals, and title work Have to be competed; others can be designated Mastering NSP Acquisitions Foreclosed upon Commit to buy only after funding agreement signed or grantee gives advance permission (ditto, abandoned) Abandoned Pending tax or mortgage foreclosure + 90 days vacant Blighted must declare that before demolishing Vacant For redevelopment (not foreclosed, abandoned) Can t count toward 25% set-aside U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 3

Acquisition Compliance Pitfalls Not meeting foreclosed criteria Purchased or under contract prematurely Not purchased from foreclosing entity Purchase contracts/options lack NSP conditions Must be conditioned on environmental review, appraisal URA and tenant protection laws not observed Notice of voluntary acquisition, relocation plan/survey, tenant notices all must coincide with purchase offer Due diligence to find out if improper evictions occurred Achieving the 25% Set-Aside Rental and special needs housing widely used Sales of homes to VLI buyers is more situational Long-term viability an issue high-cost cities Nonprofits like Habitat groups have a track record and the right counseling and support systems for buyers First-time developers in this niche are taking a chance Properties must be foreclosed or abandoned, Not just vacant - i.e. Eligible Use E doesn t count Marketing and Selling Homes Crucial and highly challenging in this market What we are learning from NSP1: Location, location, location pick the right ones and make sure to reach critical mass in micro redevelopment areas Market the homes aggressively you may need 10 or 20 lookers to get one buyer Successful sales programs complete a prequalification very early on and use standards similar to FHA s U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 4

Pricing and Subsidizing Homes More good practices we are learning from NSP1: Price homes at cost or market value, whichever is lower Provide 2 nd mortgage subsidy as necessary to achieve a combined housing payment ratio of 30% to 35% Be willing, judiciously, to invest over market value particularly in redevelopment areas and understand how development subsidies work with NSP. Minor cash down payment assistance may be needed If possible, use one recapture lien for 2 nd mortgage subsidy and cash down payment assistance Grant Management & Monitoring The lead NSP2 applicant is responsible It s crucial to master the DRGR system early on In addition, tracking systems are needed: For past, current and projected activities and expenses at the parcel level, by eligible property type and units meeting set-aside - flowing up to lead entity frequently Many major compliance issues have been mentioned today but of course there are more Use the HUD resources like www.hudnsphelp.info and clinics and request technical assistance Key Steps in Grant Management Orient and train staff and partners Make strong written agreements Set performance standards Monitor subrecipients, developers and contractors as frequently as necessary Track progress against milestones and deliverables defined in the agreements Follow up to resolve problems U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 5

Learn and Communicate! Whatever you think you know about NSP, you will very likely learn something new every week NSP is far more challenging than DPA or owner rehabs All players have to be entrepreneurs in a dynamic market Unpredictable issues about property eligibility, timing and other issues arise frequently with grantees and developers Field offices often get involved, and now TA providers All parties need to be frank and open about problems, and also provide the moral and practical supports for success Suggestions? HUD has requested your written suggestions on changes in policies and guidance for the NSP program Major policy changes requiring Congressional action are welcome, but we can t count on proposed amendments being approved some have been proposed by industry groups. HUD s leadership has pledged to do all it can to make NSP policies and guidance more workable, within the current statutory framework www.hudnsphelp.info will have more streamlined FAQs and up-to-date guidance on recently-resolved policy issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 6