Refinement of Cadastral Maps

Similar documents
Parcel Boundaries in the Czech Republic

The (Legal) Reliability of the Cadastre from the Perspective of the Czech Republic. Mgr. Martina Hercegová Ing. Karel Štencel

COOPERATION BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR - PROJECT OF DIGITALIZATION OF THE CADASTRAL MAPS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Large scale maps from Regions point of view. RNDr. Ivo Skrášek Head of IT department Zlín Region

Legislative changes in the department of geodesy, cartography and cadastre of real estates since 1st September 2009

Section I General Information

Problems and Solution Proposals in Integration of Cadastral Data into Geographical Information System (GIS) in Turkey

Parcel Boundaries in the Czech Republic

Ownership Data in Cadastral Information System of Sofia (CIS Sofia) from the Available Cadastral Map

The Digital Cadastral Database and the Role of the Private Licensed Surveyors in Denmark

The Boundary and the Effects of Cadastral Surveying in Cyprus

The Multipurpose Hungarian Unified Land Registry System

The Multi-Purpose Information System of Real Estates in the Czech Republic. Vladimíra ŽUFANOVÁ, Czech Republic

Ordinance on Official Cadastral Surveying

Analytical Cadastre in Israel: Restoring Land Boundaries Based on Photogrammetric Tools

A Geocoded Cadastral Fabric as a Precondition for a Sustainable Land Management System

A Complete, Free Solution for Cadastral Map Management

PROBLEMS IN REGISTRATION IN THE THIRD VERTICAL DIMENSION IN THE UNIFIED LAND REGISTRY IN HUNGARY, AND POSSIBLE SOLUTION

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Mass Valuation and the Implementation Necessity of GIS (Geographic Information System) in Albania

Cadastre and Other Public Registers: Multipurpose Cadastre or Distributed Land Information System?

ABSTRACT Land Administration System in Lithuania

Republic of Bulgaria

WHAT IS NEW IN CADASTRE OF CZECH REPUBLIC. Libor Tomandl FIG Annual Meeting 2005, Madison

Field surveying inspection using tablets

New Cadastral Mapping in the Czech Republic

Annual Report Of the Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre For 2017

THE CADASTRE AND RELATED PROBLEMS IN TURKEY Osman DEMİR and Mehmet ÇETE (TR)

Object Oriented Unified Real Estate Registry for a Good Spatial Data Management

Cadastral Template 2003

Aspect of preliminary activities in the function of supporting NSDI

Functional system for cadastral plans

The Continuous Cadastral Mapping Plan the Computerized Digital File of Cadastral Map in Korea - Focusing on the Accurative Continuous Cadastral Map -

Annual Report Of the Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre For 2016

Topographic Signs Important Context of 3D Cadastre

250 CMR: BOARD OF REGISTRATION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES Volume 2, No 2, 2011

REGISTRATION OF PROPERTIES IN STRATA

LADM-based Crowdsourced 3D Cadastral Surveying Potential and Perspectives

From 2D representation of the buildings into cadastral maps towards 3D GIS applications and BIM a case study for Prishtina

BULGARIAN CADASTRE A GUARANTEE FOR THE OWNERSHIP RIGHTS IN IMMOVABLE PROPERTIES

Establishing Efficient Cadastral Surveying Plan in Accordance with Introducing World Geodetic Reference System in Korea

Institute of Cadastral Surveying (Inc)

GENERAL BUSINESS CONDITIONS TOP TISK obaly s.r.o.

General Business Terms and Conditions. I. General provisions

LAND CADASTRE AND BUILDING CADASTRE IN SLOVENIA: CURRENT SITUATION AND POTENTIAL OF 3D DATA

ACCURACY DETERMINATION FOR THE AUSTRIAN DIGITAL CADASTRAL MAP (DKM)

From Parcel to Global Cadastre: Challenges and Issues of the Post-Reform Quebec Cadastre. Elisabetta Genovese, Francis Roy

Standards of Practice for Surveying in the State of Alabama

Hybrid Cadastre Pilot Project Guidelines for Public Land Disposition Surveys Operations Division

2401 S. E. Monterey Road, Stuart, FL Plat Application Martin County Growth Management Department

Changes of Ownership Manual DISCLAIMER

Hungarian Cadastre and its relation to LADM

Test and Implementation of DATR System in Hungary

Reliability of the Italian cadastral system data quality and improvement prospects

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Land Administration System in Russian Federation

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB3229 Project Name. Land Registry and Cadastre Modernization Project Region

Senate Bill 297 Ordered by the Senate March 2 Including Senate Amendments dated March 2

Country report, HUNGARY

Regular Condominium Guide

Training the Next Generation of Appraisers The S.T.A.R.T. Program - Standards to Assure Responsible Training:

Accounting for Amalgamations

Cadastral Information System of Sofia

Click to edit Master title style

GAUSSCAD A WEBGIS APPLICATION FOR COLLECTING CADASTRAL DATA

Cadastre: definitions

Hungary is a landlocked, Central European country in the Carpathian Basin

Tradition and Innovation in Czech Cadastre. Karel Večeře Martina Hercegová Jan Kmínek Czech Office for Surveying, Mapping and Cadastre

Online Cadastre and Tantalis GATOR


THINKING OUTSIDE THE TRIANGLE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF MODERN LAND MARKETS. Ian Williamson

REFORM OF LAND CADASTRE IN LITHUANIA

Application of Finite Difference Method to Develop Land Value Map

CADASTRAL MAPS AND GIS FOR SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF KOSOVA

78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 297

The Challenge to Implement International Cadastral Models Case Finland 1

Land Cadastre Act. Chapter 1. Passed RT I 1994, 74, 1324 Entry into force (except 3 which entered into force on 1.01.

The Necessity for Interdisciplinary Cooperation as a Part of FIG Activity

NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE REAL PROPERTY REGISTER AND CADASTRE IN LITHUANIA

Unified Land Administration for a Better Spatial Infrastructure

General Instructions For Surveys and Plans Outside the Provincial Survey System

ParcelMap BC. Compiling a Parcel Fabric for the Province of British Columbia. WENDY AMY and ELLEN STYNER

Designing for transparency and participation in the Hellenic Cadastral Project

Design and Determine 3D Cadastral Systems: A Case Study of Turkey Hicret GURSOY SURMENELI* and Mehmet ALKAN* (Turkey)

ASA MTS CANDIDATE REPORT REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS (Effective as of January 01, 2018) Basic Report Requirements and General Report Quality

Cadastral Framework Standards

Role of spatial planning in modern society

Quality Improvement of the Real Estate Cadastre in Serbia

THE NEW ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION REGULATIONS - article published in Vector magazine April 2009 edition, pages 6-8

USER MANUAL EN IN Pedometer insportline Pallete

New Developments in the Hellenic Cadastre

Directorate of Survey and Mapping NAMIBIA. Cadastral Information System. Vehupisa Kasuko Tjatindi Surveyor Directorate of Survey and Mapping NAMIBIA

Information contained

A Method For Building Legal Digital Cadastre Without Using Cadastral Measurements Field Book Data Is It Accurate Enough?

Ⅱ-2. The Resurvey Project

Proposals for Best Practice

Notes from Guest Contributor Mary Ross

The creation of a Survey Accurate Cadastral Map for surveyed areas in Trinidad & Tobago

Sub-Degree on the Procedure of Establishing. Cadastral Index Map and Land Register

R/W PREQUALIFICATION ODOT, 3/14/2018

Transcription:

Acta Montanistica Slovaca Ročník 16(2011), číslo 4, 242-248 Refinement of Cadastral Maps Alena Berková 1 Making cadastral maps more precise The amended cadastral ordinance takes effect from 1.7. 2009. Until this date the only cadastral maps for which two lists of coordinates for detailed survey points were filed were digitalized cadastral maps in stable cadastre coordinate systems. The entry into force of the amended ordinance has introduced the obligation to file these lists in all forms of cadastral maps. We have one file with coordinates of image and a second one with coordinates of position. The accuracy of the detailed survey points is defined by a quality code. The quality code is indicated in only one of the lists: either that of the image coordinates or that of the positional coordinates. The type of quality code depends on the willingness of property owners to sign a substantiating declaration of consent regarding the demarcation of a boundary line or the refinement of a boundary line. An integral part of the substantiating declaration is a survey sketch. The paper deals with survey sketch variants with regard to the amended ordinance. Key words: cadastral ordinance, cadastral map, two lists of coordinates, survey sketch Introduction The currently effective ordinance for Act No. 265/1992 Coll. on the recording of ownership and other in rem rights concerning real estate property and Act No. 344/1992 Sb., on the real estate cadastre of the Czech Republic (the Cadastre Act) is, from 1.3.2007, Ordinance No. 26/2007 Coll. (the Cadastral Ordinance). From 1.7.2009 this ordinance is effective as the amended Ordinance No. 164/2009 Coll. (the Amended Cadastral Ordinance). The amendment is a reaction to the currently ongoing digitization of cadastral maps, which has as its goal the conversion of the content of existing analogue cadastral maps into digital format with a prescribed form and data structure. Towards the end of 2009 about 44% of the total amount of land in the cadastre had been digitized. The remaining cadastral maps awaiting conversion into digital format are mainly those with a scale in Vienna fathoms with low precision as concerns the location of property boundary lines. The main tool for solving this problem is the option of bringing greater refinement to geometric and positional determination. It is possible to increase precision if the following conditions are fulfilled. When entering new records into the cadastre of real estate a declaration from the owner must be presented substantiated by a declaration of consent clearly documenting the agreement of the owners of all land parcels to which changes are made along the course taken by the demarcated or owner-defined boundary line. Also, the difference between the situation measured in the field and the situation recorded in the cadastre of real estate must not extend beyond the permitted boundary deviations stipulated by the cadastral ordinance. If the permitted boundary deviations are exceeded it is not possible to refine the geometric and positional determination of the boundary, and in this case this is an error in the cadastral documentation which must be dealt with. In order to familiarise the reader with such issues this article will firstly contain brief descriptions of all valid forms of cadastral map in which it is necessary to draw up survey sketches; this will be followed by an explanation of terms involved in geometric and positional assessment, positional and image coordinates, and declarations of consent. A key part of the article will be dedicated to various methods by which survey sketches are drawn up. Currently used forms of cadastral map The current forms of cadastral map are detailed in 16 of Ordinance No. 26/2007 Coll. The earliest used form of cadastral map is on plastic sheeting with a visual presentation and accuracy according to the presentation and measurement methods used in the period when the survey was carried out. The usual term for such a document is analogue map. As the cadastral documentation is being renewed via new mapping, on the basis of changes to land parcels, via the conversion in the form of numerical data of analogue maps into digital format, and via the processing of sets of geodetic information, a digital cadastral map (DKM) is created. The DKM is created via the processing of analogue maps located in the Datum of the Uniform Trigonometric Cadastral Network (S-JTSK). If an analogue map is located 1 Ing. Alena Berková, Brno University of Technology, Faculty of civil engineering, Institute of geodesy, Veveří 95, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic, berkova.a@fce.vutbr.cz 242

Acta Montanistica Slovaca Ročník 16 (2011), číslo 4, 242-248 in one of the stable cadastre coordinate systems (Gusterberg, St. Stephen), a digitized cadastral map is created. The beginnings of its creation can be found in 1998. According to the regulations in effect at the time such a map also remained in digital form located in stable cadastre systems (St. Stephen, Gusterberg) as an isolated map without the alignment of cadastral boundary lines. The creation of such a map was ended on the basis of much criticism in around 2002. According to the Manual for the Renewal of Cadastral Documentation and Conversion [2] a digitized cadastral map is being created from 2008 on the basis of the conversion of rasters of maps from the stable cadastre system (S-SK) into a digital continuous geometric projection in the S-JTSK. In order to distinguish between these two cadastral maps two abbreviations are used. The digitized map with coordinates in the S-SK stable cadastre system has the abbreviation KM-D, while the digitized map with coordinates in the S-JTSK has the abbreviation KMD. Geometric and positional determination Cadastral units and real estate recorded in the cadastre are, according to the cadastral ordinance [1], geometrically and positionally determined via numerical data expressing the boundary lines of land parcels, the perimeters of buildings and water control structures which are expressed by the coordinates of break points. These break points are determined via geodetic or photogrammetric methods in the S-JTSK and by the connections between these points or simply the depiction of the boundaries of land parcels, the perimeters of buildings and water control structures on the cadastral map. The precision of the coordinates of the detailed survey points of the planimetric component of the map is expressed by a code for the quality characteristics of the coordinates (quality code). The quality code for the detailed survey points determined by geodetic or photogrammetric methods is specified according to the mean coordinate sampling error value with a dependence on the mean coordinate error m xy. The quality code of detailed survey points determined by digitization from analogue maps is set according to the scale of such maps; see Table 1. Tab. 1. Quality codes for detailed survey points. Quality code Cadastral map scale Basic mean coordinate error m xy 3 0.14 m 4 0.26 m 5 0.50 m 6 1:1000, 1:1250 0.21 m 7 1:2000, 1:2500 0.50 m 8 1:2880 and other scales not stated above 1.00 m The expression of boundary lines as numerical data simply takes the form of coordinates in the S-JTSK designated by the quality codes 3, 4 and 5; these coordinates designate real estate both geometrically and positionally. If real estate is not geometrically and positionally designated as numerical data, it is designated merely by the depiction of boundary lines on the cadastral map; this depiction can be: in analogue or digital vector form, in the S-JTSK or in the stable cadastre system (St. Stephen, Gusterberg).[3] Image and positional coordinates The amended cadastral ordinance [1] states the obligation to provide two lists of coordinates for detailed survey points of the planimetric component of maps for all valid forms of cadastral map. Before the amendment came into force this was only applied to the digitized cadastral map (KM-D) for which coordinates were recorded for all detailed survey points of the planimetric component in the St Stephen or Gusterberg systems. If a point was created via a survey sketch which contains lists of coordinates of new and linked control points that were only in the S-JTSK, it had coordinates recorded in the S-SK and the S-JTSK, because the duty of the drafter of the survey sketch was to transform coordinates defined in the S-JTSK into the stable cadastre system in which the KM-D is maintained. From 1.7.2009 all points of the planimetric component of all digital cadastral maps have their image coordinates recorded. In areas with analogue maps the image is printed on polyethylene sheets. Here, the image coordinates of the detailed survey points of the planimetric component originate from the survey sketch. Geodetic and photogrammetric methods can also be used to gain and display positional coordinates. Image coordinates for a detailed survey point of the planimetric component of the cadastral map serve in the depiction of points in the cadastral map. Whether the image and positional coordinates are identical or are different from each other depends on what is termed the proposal for the depiction of changes. Generally, it is possible to adapt the map to a change or a change to the map in the KMD. If the drafter of the survey sketch adapts the map to a change, the image and positional coordinates will be identical; if a change is adapted to the map, the image and positional 243

Alena Berková: Refinement of Cadastral Maps coordinates may differ from one another to a value given by the limit coordinate error u xy, which equals an amount double that of the basic mean coordinate error m xy. In areas with an analogue map the image coordinates displayed are identical to the positional coordinates. The quality code applies to both the positional coordinates and the image coordinates with which real estate in the cadastre should be geometrically and positionally determined. Declaration of consent Quality code 3 may only be assigned to positional coordinates, while quality codes 4-8 may only be assigned to image coordinates. Which code is assigned to a point depends on the willingness of property owners to sign a declaration of consent documenting the agreement of the owners of all land parcels to which changes are made along the course taken by the demarcated or owner-defined boundary line. According to the cadastral ordinance [1] the refined geometric and positional specification of a land parcel, or the appropriate refinement of the measurements of the parcel, is recorded in the cadastre by the Cadastral Office on the basis of a declaration by the owner substantiated by the aforementioned declaration of consent. An integral part of the declaration of consent is the survey sketch depicting the course of the demarcated or owner-defined boundary line. This means that the declaration of consent is not presented with the documentation for the survey sketch, which is prepared by its drafter for validation by the Cadastral Office and at that moment will not even be ready; however, the signing of the declaration of consent should take place on the basis of a survey sketch which has already been validated. Survey sketch variants If the survey sketch drafter is to draw up a survey sketch for the division of a land parcel where the new boundary line will follow on from an existing boundary line which is unclearly marked, they are obliged to mark out the point; the relevant property owners are to be invited. Under the amendment to the ordinance, property owners no longer sign the demarcation protocol (the signatures of property owners now form part of the declaration of consent); all that is stated there is data regarding their attendance during familiarisation with the demarcation (yes/no). The change will be connected depending on the preciseness of the geometric and positional determination of the land parcel, i.e. according to the quality code of the linked break points of the existing boundary line. It is simplest to connect a change between two points with quality codes of 3. In this case the linked point of the new boundary line will be assigned the same code (the coordinates of the image will be identical to the positional coordinates). The connection of a change between two points with a quality code of 8 can be dealt with in several ways since the amendment. According to the regulations stated in the attachment to the amended cadastral ordinance [1] it is possible to, among other things, adapt a map only via connection, providing the permitted boundary deviations are not exceeded. The point of connection will have a quality code assigned according to the linked control points of the existing boundary line (in this case 8). The image Fig. 1 Survey sketch method variant 1 coordinates for the point of connection will be different from the positional coordinates and again will be assigned according to the regulations [1]. Either the point of connection will be the point of intersection of the current and new boundary line, or it will be the base of the vertical leading from the new point to the existing boundary line. On the basis of this survey sketch, which will be an integral part of e.g. a purchase contract, the registration of this new parcel will take place via insertion. This is a variant without refinement (variant 1) - see Fig. 1. In the list of coordinates for entry in the CRE the coordinates that geometrically and positionally define the land parcel are always stated, i.e. there may be positional coordinates with a quality code of 3 as well as image coordinates with a quality code of 4 to 8. Positional coordinates are also stated alongside image coordinates if they are different from each other (points no. 12 and 27 in Table 2). If the boundary line in the cadastre is to be refined, it is necessary during registration to submit a survey sketch for the boundary line that is demarcated, or determined by the owner, along with the declaration of consent. In such a survey 244

Acta Montanistica Slovaca Ročník 16 (2011), číslo 4, 242-248 sketch the coordinates of the linked points of the new boundary line (after its demarcation and inspectional measurement) are marked as quality code 3 (see Table 3). Tab. 2. List of coordinates (S-JTSK) for the variant 1 survey sketch. Point No. Coordinates for recording in the CRE Coordinates determined via measurement Y X Quality code Y X Remark 102-403 614875.70 1110124.57 8 stake 102-404 614867.76 1110131.91 8 stake 102-405 614861.20 1110084.63 8 stake 102-417 614859.56 1110085.31 8 stake 12 614860.14 1110085.07 8 614860.05 1110084.88 corner of foundation wall 13 614857.46 1110084.91 3 corner of foundation wall 14 614850.27 1110093.21 3 corner of foundation wall 15 614849.43 1110096.07 3 corner of foundation wall 16 614848.87 1110101.87 3 corner of foundation wall 24 614848.63 1110114.31 3 corner of foundation wall 25 614849.34 1110127.14 3 corner of foundation wall 27 614870.64 1110129.25 8 614870.05 1110129.22 corner of foundation wall 28 614858.39 1110128.68 3 corner of foundation wall 30 614851.23 1110127.46 8 Remark to Table 2: The coordinates of points on the existing boundary line of the land parcel determined via measurement in the field will be adjusted for recording in the cadastre of real estate according to the existing determination of the boundary line via break points with a code characterising the quality of the coordinates which is greater than 3. The reason for this is that no refinement of the boundary line was carried out which must be substantiated by a document demonstrating the consent of the property owners to the course of the line ( 19a paragraph 4 of the Cadastre Act). If it is necessary to change the recorded quality code for points, the drafter will add the points to the list of coordinates with a new number. A cadastral office employee will, during validation of the survey sketch, change the status of the original points to past. In this way the survey sketch is validated even if the declaration of consent has not yet been prepared, so the cadastral office will expect in advance the substantiation of the declaration of consent (later substantiation of the declaration of consent is noted on the survey sketch). A second variant is firstly to draw up the survey sketch for the division of the land parcel and, after its recording in the cadastre, to then draw up a survey sketch for the course of the demarcated or owner-specified boundary line of the land parcel (variant 2) - see Fig. 2. Fig. 2. Survey sketch method variant 2. 245

Alena Berková: Refinement of Cadastral Maps Tab. 3. List of coordinates (S-JTSK) for the variant 2 survey sketch. Point No. Coordinates for recording in the CRE Coordinates determined via measurement Y X Quality code Y X Remark 98-1726 614877.39 1110099.06 3 corner of building 102-404 614867.76 1110131.91 8 stake 102-405 614861.20 1110084.63 8 stake 102-417 614859.56 1110085.31 8 stake 151-13 614857.46 1110084.91 3 corner of foundation wall 151-28 614858.39 1110128.68 3 corner of foundation wall 1 614860.05 1110084.88 3 corner of foundation wall 2 614870.05 1110129.22 3 corner of foundation wall 3 614875.02 1110125.18 3 corner of foundation wall 4 614876.13 1110112.94 3 colour on foundation wall A third variant also exists, where it is possible to draw up both survey sketches within the framework of a single survey sketch, thus resulting in a survey sketch for the course of the demarcated or ownerspecified boundary line of the land parcel or for the division of the land parcel (variant 3) see Fig. 3. According to the regulations [1] it is possible to use the proposal for the depiction of a change via the adaptation of the map to the change, among other ways, in the case that the existing geometric and positional determination can be refined, at least via the specification of the coordinates of connection points without the specification of linked control points. The map adapts to the change via the connection of the existing state of the planimetric component to the points involved in the change. The image coordinates are identical to the positional coordinates with a quality code of 3 (see Table 4). Fig. 3. Survey sketch method variant 3. The cadastral ordinance does not exclude the combination of survey sketches for multiple purposes. This technique is risky in the sense that if the refinement of geometric and positional determination does not take place, the desired transfer of part of the land parcel in question will not take place either. It is therefore necessary to arrange the writing of a declaration of consent with the owners of neighbouring land parcels in advance, just like the purchasing of part of a parcel. The change will be recorded in the cadastre after the owner (or one of a group of owners) has announced it, substantiated by a declaration of consent. It is also possible to announce the refinement of just part of a boundary line of break points marked on a survey sketch (e.g. when an owner changes their mind about signing a declaration of consent); the cadastral office will only prepare a partial survey sketch in such cases (specifying only the points declared in the 246

Acta Montanistica Slovaca Ročník 16 (2011), číslo 4, 242-248 announcement that are substantiated by a declaration of consent). If in the survey sketch it was proposed that the measurements of a parcel be refined, it is necessary to specify all of the break points from which the measurements were calculated. Point No. Tab. 4. List of coordinates for the variant 3 survey sketch. Coordinates for recording in the CRE Coordinates determined by measurement Y X Quality code Y X Remark 98-1726 614877.39 1110099.06 3 corner of building 102-404 614867.76 1110131.91 8 stake 102-405 614861.20 1110084.63 8 stake 102-417 614859.56 1110085.31 8 stake 12 614860.05 1110084.88 3 corner of foundation wall 13 614857.46 1110084.91 3 corner of foundation wall 14 614850.27 1110093.21 3 corner of foundation wall 15 614849.43 1110096.07 3 corner of foundation wall 16 614848.87 1110101.87 3 corner of foundation wall 24 614848.63 1110114.31 3 corner of foundation wall 25 614849.34 1110127.14 3 corner of foundation wall 26 614875.02 1110125.18 3 corner of foundation wall 27 614870.05 1110129.22 3 corner of foundation wall 28 614858.39 1110128.68 3 corner of foundation wall 30 614851.23 1110127.46 8 31 614876.13 1110112.94 3 colour on foundation wall Conclusion The drafter of the survey sketch must know how to work with analogue and numerical maps, the digital cadastral map and the cadastral map digitized, previously in the stable cadastre system and now in the S-JTSK. The amended cadastral ordinance attempts to unify the principles by which all forms of cadastral map are maintained. After completion of the renewal of the cadastral documentation all cadastral maps should be administrated in the Cadastral Real Estate Information System (today the KM-D is administrated outside this system) as a continuous image. Updating should only take place via the new replacement format. The connection of the existing planimetric component to the points which have changed should be implemented with a dependence on the accuracy of the geometric and positional definition of land parcels, and never in the form of a map. When dividing up land parcels with break points with a quality code of 3 it is immaterial whether the map is termed a digital cadastral map or a cadastral map digitized, just as in the case of the division of land parcels with points having a quality code of 8. For points with a quality code worse than 3 it is important that an attempt be made to specify the geometric and positional definition of the land parcel. The list of coordinates in a survey sketch contains the changed points and the linked control points, which are part of the proposal for the depiction of change; identical points are also transferred to the relevant cadastral office. Those points on an analogue map are assigned quality codes according to the scale of the cadastral map. Points on new boundary lines which concurrently are not points connecting a change can have a quality code of 3, as can points on new internal drawings and points connected to existing boundary lines with break points with a quality code of 3 or substantiated by a declaration of consent and a survey sketch for the course of the demarcated or owner-specified boundary lines of land parcels. The rules are set up so that the declaration of consent does not only concern property boundary lines between more than one property owner, but also existing boundary lines between two land parcels belonging to one owner. More than 50% of cadastral land is still covered by analogue cadastral maps. In these maps it can occur that the numbers of detailed survey points in the planimetric component of the map and the quality code of their coordinates may, with regard to the methods used in the past while filling up the register of coordinates, not be adequate in terms of current regulations. Cadastral offices today are trying to check if the recorded quality codes are correct for all cadastral units in the register of coordinates, and they are doing this in advance before the cadastral documentation is renewed. 247

Alena Berková: Refinement of Cadastral Maps This contribution arose within the framework of specific research at FCE BUT, Brno, Czech Republic. Translated by Roger Turland. Reference [1] Ordinance implementing Act No. 265/1992 Coll. on the recording of property and other in rem real estate rights, as amended, and Act No. 344/1992 Coll. on the cadastre of real estate of the Czech Republic, as amended (the cadastral ordinance), as amended by ordinance No. 164/2009 Coll. [2] Manual for the Renewal of Cadastral Documentation and Transfer, from 20.12.2007, ČÚZK, no. 6530/2007-22, as amended by appendix No.1 from 25.1.2008, ČÚZK, no. 338/2008-22 and appendix No. 2 from 27.5.2009, ČÚZK, no. 2390/2009-22. [3] Guide to the application of the provisions of the cadastral ordinance concerning the coordinates of detailed survey points, ČÚZK, attachment to no. 6495/2009-22. [4] Instruction for work with data from the register of coordinates, ČÚZK, č.j. 3365/2009-22. [5] 45th Geodetic Information Days, lecture collection, The Brno Association of Surveyors, November 2009, ISBN 978-80-86433-37-0. 248