Planning and Development Services 2001 S. State Street N3-600 Salt Lake City, UT 84190-4050 Phone: (385) 468-6700 Fax: (385) 468-6674 www.pwpds.slco.org Magna Metro Township Council Meeting Public Meeting Agenda Tuesday, July 18, 2017 7:00 P.M. Location WEBSTER CENTER 8952 WEST MAGNA MAIN STREET MAGNA, 84044 (385) 468-6700 UPON REQUEST, WITH 5 WORKING DAYS NOTICE, REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS MAY BE PROVIDED. PLEASE CONTACT WENDY GURR AT 385-468-6707. TTY USERS SHOULD CALL 711. The Township Council Public Meeting is a public forum where, depending on the agenda item, the Township Council may receive comment and recommendations from applicants, the public, applicable agencies and County staff regarding land use applications and other items on the Township Council s agenda. In addition, it is where the Township Council takes action on these items, which may include: approval, approval with conditions, denial, or continuance as applicable. BUSINESS MEETING Presentation of Alternative Bus Concept for Phase I Transit on 5600 West (Mountain View Corridor Transit Element) UTA and WSP USA PUBLIC HEARINGS 30311 Chris Clifford is requesting approval of a zone change for.02 acres from the R-1-6 z/c (Single Family Residential; 6,000 sq. ft. min. lot size, zoning condition limiting density) zone to the R-1-6 (Single Family Residential; 6,000 sq. ft. min. lot size) zone. The adjacent properties were previously approved for the requested change in zoning, this hearing is necessary due to a clerical error omitting this parcel from the official notice. Location: 3234 South 9100 West. Planner: Todd A. Draper, AICP. 30361 Murray Sharp is requesting a rezone from A-20 (Agricultural) to M-2 (Manufacturing). Location: 2330 and 2232 South 7200 West. Planner: Jeff Miller 30384 Matthew Loveland is requesting approval for a rezone of 7.6 acres from A-1 z/c to R-1-4. Location: 7792, 7824, 7762, 7746, and 7758 West 2820 South. Planner: Spencer Hymas 30317 Tyler Whiting & Brittany Patterson are requesting a rezone from A-20 to M-2. Parcel Area:.87 Acre. Location: 7525 West Tempo Road. Community Council: Magna. Planner: Tom C. Zumbado. July 18, 2017 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP
This page intentionally left blank
File # 30311 Rezone Summary and Recommendation Public Body: Magna Metro Parcel ID s: 14-30-408-008 Property Addresses: 3287 South 9200 West Request: Rezone Community Council: Magna Planner: Todd A. Draper, AICP Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval Community Council Recommendation: not available Planning Staff Recommendation: Approval Applicant Name: Christopher Clifford Meeting Date: 2017 Current Zone: R-1-6 z/c Proposed Zone: R-1-6 Metro Township: Magna PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant approv a zone change from the R-1-6 z/c (Single Family Residential; 6,000 sq. ft. min. lot size, zoning condition limiting density to maximum of 30 dwelling units) zone to the R-1-6 (Single Family Residential; 6,000 sq. ft. min. lot size) zone. The property is located on the West side of the Magna Metro Township adjacent to 9200 West. The zoning in the area is predominantly single family residential with Kennecott owned industrially zoned land to the West. The adjoining property to the South is zoned R-1-6 and together with these three parcels is proposed to become a new 65 lot residential subdivision. Neighboring properties to the North are zoned R-1-8.
Request: Rezone File #: 30311 ZONE CONSIDERATIONS Requirement Existing Zone Proposed Zone Height 35 feet 35 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet Side Yard Setback 5 feet and 11 feet, or 8 feet and 8 feet 5 feet and 11 feet, or 8 feet and 8 feet Rear Yard Setback 30 feet (15 feet with Garage) 30 feet (15 feet with Garage) Lot Width 60 feet 60 feet Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. min. 6,000 sq. ft. min. Density Maximum of 30 Dwelling Units/ lots Maximum of 6 units per acre (46 units) Parking 2 spaces per dwelling unit 2 spaces per dwelling unit Compatibility with existing buildings in terms of size, scale and height. Compliance with Landscaping Requirements Verified. Compliance with the General Plan. Yes n/a Yes GENERAL PLAN CONSIDERATIONS The area is designated on the General plan map as a stable area with little limited potential for the absorption of growth and is likely to experience only minor changes in overall character over time. Subtle changes in land use may occur. Additionally, one of the core concepts of the plan regarding the Land use and mobility Best Practice is to balance zoning to respond to market demands on housing. Envision Utah s Quality Growth Strategy as referenced in the General plan recommends redeveloping underutilized areas and to reducing the average single family lot size by 10%. Currently housing in the Salt Lake Valley, including the Magna Metro Area is in high demand. Rezone Summary Page 2 of 5
Request: Rezone File #: 30311 The following are excerpts of goals and objectives from the Magna General Plan related to community design and housing choices and which could be pertinent in evaluating the rezone proposal: Goal 2: COMMUNITY Develop communities with quality urban design that encourage social interaction and support family and community relationships, as well as healthy, active lifestyles. Objective 2.1: Preserve and foster the concepts of good community design at the city, neighborhood, and project level. Objective 2.3: Develop a network of physical connections that maximize the number of potential routes between neighborhoods that improves access to schools, churches, public facilities, and commercial centers. Goal 5: HOUSING CHOICES Provide diverse housing choices for a variety of needs and income levels to create places where all citizens are welcome to live. Objective 5.1: Provide sufficient housing for current and future populations that are appropriate, safe, and affordable for a range of income levels. Objective 5.2: Consider life-cycle housing alternatives that allow for aging populations to age in place, as well as provide diverse housing choice for other demographic groups. Objective 5.3: Promote a diverse mix of housing options through higher density, mixed-use development in appropriate areas, especially along the historic Main Street corridor. Objective 5.4: Encourage residential development that establishes a variety of lot sizes, dwelling types, densities, and price points, as well as an appropriate balance of owner occupied and rental units. Objective 5.5: Develop safe and visually pleasing residential neighborhoods that are integrated into the natural environment with open space, trails, and green systems. Objective 5.6: Develop programs and neighborhoods that will make home ownership attractive and possible for all members of the community. See Neighborhood Response and Staff Analysis. ISSUES OF CONCERN/PROPOSED MITIGATION NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE Past neighborhood response to the previous rezone of the property in 2007 from R-1-8 to R-1-6 z/c appears to have been generally favorable but mixed. Both Community Councils recommended in favor of rezoning the property to the R-1-6 zone that was requested at that time, but recommended the zoning condition be included to limit density based on the subdivision plan that was being proposed at that time. The Salt Lake County Council did approve the change of zoning to allow for smaller minimum lot sizes and lot widths, and included the zoning condition limiting the total number of lots that could be created for residential purposes. Rezone Summary Page 3 of 5
Request: Rezone File #: 30311 COMMUNITY COUNCIL RESPONSE No response from the community councils has been received. PLANNING COMMISSIONS RESPONSE The Magna Metro Township Planning Commission at their regular meeting on April 13, 2017 made a recommendation to the Magna Metro Township Council that they approve the rezone request as presented. AGENCY: Long Range Planning Review RECOMMENDATION: Approval REVIEWING AGENCIES RESPONSE PLANNING STAFF ANALYSIS 19.90.010 - Amendment procedure. The Magna Metro Council may amend the number, shape, boundaries or area of any zone or any regulation within any zone. Any such amendment shall not be made or become effective unless the same shall have been proposed by or be first submitted for the recommendation of the relevant planning commission. 19.90.030 - Determination of council. The Magna Metro Council, after review of the recommendation of the planning commission, may approve, deny, alter or remand for further review and consideration any application for zone change referred to the council by the planning commission. 19.90.060 - Conditions to zoning map amendment. A. In order to provide more specific land use designations and land development suitability; to insure that proposed development is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods; and to provide notice to property owners of limitations and requirements for development of property, conditions may be attached to any zoning map amendment which limit or restrict the following: 1. Uses; 2. Dwelling unit density; 3. Building square footage; 4. Height of structures. B. A zoning map amendment attaching any of the conditions set forth in subsection A shall be designated ZC after the zoning classification on the zoning map and any such conditions shall be placed on record with the planning commission and recorded with the county recorder. Rezone Summary Page 4 of 5
Request: Rezone File #: 30311 C. In the event any zoning condition is declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, then the entire zoning map amendment shall be void. Any deletion in or change to zoning condition shall be considered an amendment to the zoning ordinance and shall be subject to the requirements of this chapter. While the change in density would increase the number of single family lots allowed on these properties, it would not change the minimum lot size of 6,000 sq. ft. currently allowed. The current proposed subdivision has 38-39 dwelling units proposed for the area (2 of which would straddle the current zoning boundary). Approval of the rezone could create a potential density of up to 46 residential units, but would resolve any issues related to split zoning across proposed subdivision lots. Approving this rezone could be contrary to the previous intentions to limit density, however, approval would be consistent with the desires and needs expressed by the larger community through the general plan. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION Planning staff reviewed the request and recommended to the Magna Metro Township Planning Commission that they make a recommendation to the Magna Metro Township Council that the rezone request be approved. This was based on the facts that the land use would remain residential which is in line with the General Plan map, and that the General Plan calls for smaller residential lot sizes to meet the current and future demand for housing. Rezone Summary Page 5 of 5
ENGINEERING AND FLOOD CONTROL PLANNING COMMISSION HEALTH QUESTAR PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION UTILITY APPROVAL AS TO FORM VICINITY MAP MAGNA PROJECT SITE LEGEND UTAH AND SALT LAKE CANAL COMPANY MAGNA WATER MAYOR SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: OQUIRRH MEADOWS PHASE 4 SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION: BASIS OF BEARING: GENERAL NOTES: OWNER'S DEDICATION OQUIRRH MEADOWS PHASE 4 SUBDIVISION ACKNOWLEDGMENT: ACKNOWLEDGMENT: LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN SALT LAKE COUNTY RECORDER B
File #30311 Zoning Map M-2 R-1-8 R-1-6 z/c R-1-8 R-1-6 R-1-8
File #30311 Aerial Map
MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO., 2017 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 19, ENTITLED "ZONING", OF THE MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP CODE OF ORDINANCES, 2017, BY RECLASSIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED IN MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP FROM THE R- 1-6 Z/C (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL INCLUSIVE OF ZONING CONDITIONS) ZONE TO THE R-1-6 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY) ZONE. The Magna Metro Township legislative body of Magna Metro Township, State of Utah, ordains as follows: Section 1: Section, 19.06.020, Zoning Maps of Magna Metro Township Code of Ordinances 2017, is hereby amended, as follows: The property described in Application #30311 filed by Chris Clifford and Karl Prisbrey located at 3287 South 9200 West within the Magna Metro Township (the Property ), is hereby reclassified from the R-1-6 z/c (Single-Family Residential, inclusive of zoning conditions) zone to the R-1-6 (Single- Family Residential) zone. The Property is more particularly described as follows: PARCEL #14-30-408-008-0000, BEG N 0 22 45" E 1320.806 FT & N 89 39 33" W 1324.388 FT FR SE COR SEC 30, T 1S, R 2W, SLM; N 0 04 03" E 156.341 FT M OR L; E 3.34 FT M OR L; S 0 53 57" E 39.14 FT; S 0 53 59" E 64.971 FT; S 0 53 58" E 59.15 FT; S 89 56 38" W 6.095 FT M OR L; N 0 04 03" E 6.096 FT M OR L TO BEG. 0.02 AC M OR L. Section 2: The map showing such change shall be filed with the Magna Metro Township Planning Commission in accordance with Section 19.06.020 of the Magna Metro Township, Code of Ordinances, 2017. Section 3: This ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its passage and upon at least one publication in a newspaper published in and having general circulation in Salt Lake County, and if
App. 30311 Page 2 not so published within fifteen (15) days then it shall take effect immediately upon its first publication. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Magna Metro Township Council has approved, passed and adopted this ordinance this day of, 2017. MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP COUNCIL By: Dan Peay, Chair Magna Metro Township Council ATTESTED: Sherrie Swensen, County Clerk Approved as to Form: Paul H. Ashton Magna Metro Township Attorney Date: ORDINANCE HISTORY Council Member Prokopis Council Member Peel Council Member Peay Council Member Hull Council Member Ferguson (Complete As Applicable) Ordinance published in newspaper: Date Effective date of ordinance:
File # 30361 Rezone Summary and Recommendation Public Body: Magna Metro Township Council Meeting Date: July 18, 2017 Parcel IDs: 14-21-200-016, 14-21-200-012, and 14-21-200-021 Current Zones: A-20 and M-1 Proposed Zone: M-2 Property Addresses: 2232 & 2330 South 7200 West Request: Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural) and M-1 (Manufacturing) to M-2 (Manufacturing) Metro Township: Magna Planner: Jeff Miller Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval Planning Staff Recommendation: Approval Applicant Name: Murray Sharp PROJECT DESCRIPTION Murray Armstrong is requesting a rezone from A-20 (Agricultural) to M-2 (Manufacturing) for two parcels, and a rezone from M-1 (Manufacturing) to M-2 (Manufacturing) for one parcel. The subject property located at 2232 South is 4.75 acres in size, and is currently being used as a Trucking Yard. Two-thirds of the existing parcel is currently zoned M-2, with the remaining one-third zoned A-20. The portion of the property zoned agricultural does not meet the minimum lot size of 20 acres for the A-20 zone. The subject properties located at 2330 South are 0.99 acres in size for the parcel currently zoned A-20, and 0.16 acres in size for the parcel currently zoned M-1. The primary parcel located at 2330 South is 2.70 acres in size, is currently zoned M-2, and is being used for Steel Fabrication. The applicant has requested the proposed rezone, to allow all parcels for both addresses to be under one zoning designation. SITE & VICINITY DESCRIPTION (see attached map) The subject properties are surrounded by parcels in the M-1 and M-2 zones, as well as some parcels located in West Valley City, which appear to be industrial.
Request: Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural) to M-2 (Manufacturing) File #: 30361 ZONE CONSIDERATIONS Requirement Existing Zone (A-20) Proposed Zone (M-2) Height Except as otherwise provided by the term of a conditional use permit, no structure in the A-20 zone shall exceed a height equal to the distance between such None structure and the nearest property line of the parcel on which it is situated. Front Yard Setback 50 Feet No commercial or industrial building or structure shall be located closer than 20 Feet to any street. Side Yard Setback 20 Feet None Rear Yard Setback 50 Feet None Lot Width 200 Feet None Lot Area 20 Acres None Lot Coverage None No building, structure or group of buildings, with their accessory buildings, shall cover more than 80 percent of the area of the lot. Conditional Use Summary Page 2 of 4
Request: Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural) to M-2 (Manufacturing) File #: 30361 Requirement Existing Zone (M-1) Proposed Zone (M-2) Height None None Front Yard Setback No commercial or industrial building or structure shall be located closer than 20 Feet to any street. No commercial or industrial building or structure shall be located closer than 20 Feet to any street. Side Yard Setback None None Rear Yard Setback None None Lot Width None None Lot Area None None Lot Coverage No building, structure or group of buildings, with their accessory buildings, shall cover more than 80 percent of the area of the lot. No building, structure or group of buildings, with their accessory buildings, shall cover more than 80 percent of the area of the lot. ISSUES OF CONCERN/PROPOSED MITIGATION Planning Staff has not identified any issues of concern with the proposed rezone request. NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE Planning Staff has not received any response from the surrounding neighbors as of the completion of this report. Any responses that are received will be presented to the Magna Metro Town on June 8, 2017. PLANNING COMMISSIONS RESPONSE This item was heard by the Magna Metro Township Planning Commission on May 11, 2017. They made a recommendation of approval to rezone the property located at: 2232 South 7200 West. There was some discussion during the meeting about the application potentially coming back before the planning commission, if the property owner to the south (located at 2330 South) wanted to be part of the rezone application. This property owner has an isolated parcel in the A-20 zone, as well as a narrow parcel zoned M-1. This adjoining neighbor has chosen to be part of the requested rezone, in order to allow all three of the parcels located at 2330 South to be under one zoning designation. The Magna Metro Township made a recommendation of approval to rezone the additional property located at: 2330 South 7200 West on June 8, 2017. REVIEWING AGENCIES RESPONSE Compliance with current building, construction, engineering, fire, health, landscape and safety standards will be verified prior to final approval of any structures built on this property, if the properties are rezoned to M-2. PLANNING STAFF ANALYSIS 19.90.060 Conditions to zoning map amendment. Conditional Use Summary Page 3 of 4
Request: Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural) to M-2 (Manufacturing) File #: 30361 A. In order to provide more specific land use designations and land development suitability; to ensure that proposed development is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods; and to provide notice to property owners of limitations and requirements for development of property, conditions may be attached to any zoning map amendment which limit or restrict the following: 1. Uses; 2. Dwelling unit density; 3. Building square footage; 4. Height of structures. B. A zoning map amendment attaching any of the conditions set forth in subsection A shall be designated ZC after the zoning classification on the zoning map and any such conditions shall be placed on record with the planning commission and recorded with the county recorder. Planning Staff has analyzed the proposed rezone from A-20 and M-1 to M-2, and has found that the request is cohesive with the surrounding uses and zones. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION Ordinance [19.90.030] The council, after review of the recommendation of the planning commission, may approve, deny, alter or remand for further review and consideration any application for zone change referred to the council by the planning commission. Staff has reviewed this rezone request for compliance with the standards set forth in the Magna Metro Township Zoning Ordinance (Title 19), and for compatibility with existing neighboring land uses, and recommended that the Magna Metro Township Planning Commission provided a recommendation of approval to the Magna Metro Township Council for the requested rezone. Conditional Use Summary Page 4 of 4
File # 30361: Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural) & M-1 (Manufacturing) to M-2 (Manufacturing) 2232 South 7200 West (Parcel # 14-21-200-016), 2330 South 7200 West (Parcel # 14-21-200-012, and 14-21-200-021) M-1 A-20 M-2 M-2 M-2 M-2 A-20 M-2 A-20 A-20 West Valley City A-20 M-1 M-2 A-20 M-1
File # 30361: Rezone from A-20 (Agricultural) & M-1 (Manufacturing) to M-2 (Manufacturing) 2232 South 7200 West (Parcel # 14-21-200-016), 2330 South 7200 West (Parcel # 14-21-200-012, and 14-21-200-021) M-1 A-20 M-2 M-2 M-2 M-2 A-20 M-2 A-20 A-20 West Valley City A-20 M-2 M-1 A-20 M-1
Matthew Loveland is requesting approval for a rezone of 7. acres from A-1 z/c to R-1-4. The zoning condition prohibits duplexes/two-family dwellings. It is intended that the property associated with the rezone will be a future phase in the Fieldstone Master Planned Development that is currently under review with staff. The property associated with the rezone is surrounded by other property zoned A-1 z/c. To the north is phase 1 of Fieldstone s Master Planned Development with zones ranging from R-1-4 to R-1-6. To the east, south and west of Parkway Boulevard, the uses are single and two-family residential and the lot sizes range from 10,000 square feet down to 2,500 square feet. Height 35 feet 35 feet Front Yard Setback 30 feet 20 feet Side Yard Setback 8 & 10 feet (18 feet total) 5 feet (10 feet total) Rear Yard Setback 15 feet 15 feet Lot Width 65 feet 25 feet Lot Area 10,000 square feet 4,000 square feet
Compatibility with existing buildings in terms of size, scale and height. Compliance with Landscaping Requirements Verified. Compliance with the General Plan. Yes N/A Yes The general plan map identified Parkway Boulevard (2820 S) as a Corridor that can provide for adaptable - flexible changes. Staff believes this proposal is within the bounds for consideration. The proposed rezone would contribute to the following goals and objectives within the general plan: Goal 2: Develop communities with quality urban design than encourage social interaction and support family and community relationships, as well as healthy, active lifestyles. Staff believes the design associated with the master planned community is in line with this goal. Adding another phase to the master planned community would provide more open space and access opportunities/connections to the rest of the community and the trail. Goal 3: Promote land use development patterns that provide a high quality of life to all and offer choice in mobility. Objective 3.2: Develop bicycle routes and paths that can be integrated with the street network and also with trail systems, canals, and greenways. Adding additional mobility connections to the community contributes towards this goal. Part of the master planned community incorporates the development of a significant trail along the canal. Goal 5: Provide diverse housing choices for a variety of needs and income levels to create places where all citizens are welcome to live. Objective 5.1: Provide sufficient housing for current and future populations that are appropriate, safe, and affordable for a range of income levels. Objective 5.2: Consider life-cycle housing alternatives that allow for aging populations to age in place, as well as provide diverse housing choices for other demographic groups. Objective 5.3: Promote a diverse mix of housing options through higher density, mixed-use development in appropriate areas. Objective 5.4: Encourage residential development that establishes a variety of lot sizes, dwelling types, densities, and price points, as well as an appropriate balance of owner occupied and rental units. Objective 5.5: Develop safe and visually pleasing residential neighborhoods that are integrated into the natural environment with open space, trails, and green systems. The proposed rezone may contribute towards the goals above. Adding additional phases to the master planned development would satisfy the goals and objectives above as it would create a range of housing options that would appeal to a range of income levels. Staff believes that the mixture of densities is being proposed in an appropriate area; that it will be safe, visually pleasing and integrated into the environment with open space, trails, and green systems. In review of the Magna General Plan, staff believes that the proposed rezone could contribute to many of the goals and objectives defined in the plan. Staff also believes that the area being proposed for rezone is a suitable location for the proposed density mixture. The overall density will be approximately 10 units per acre and will be designed to buffer from existing and proposed uses.
None has been received at the time of this report. Staff will provide updates to the planning commission on responses received. 19.90.060 - Conditions to zoning map amendment. A. In order to provide more specific land use designations and land development suitability; to ensure that proposed development is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods; and to provide notice to property owners of limitations and requirements for development of property, conditions may be attached to any zoning map amendment which limit or restrict the following: 1.Uses; 2.Dwelling unit density; 3.Building square footage; 4.Height of structures. B. A zoning map amendment attaching any of the conditions set forth in subsection A shall be designated ZC after the zoning classification on the zoning map and any such conditions shall be placed on record with the planning commission and recorded with the county recorder. C. In the event any zoning condition is declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, then the entire zoning map amendment shall be void. Any deletion in or change to zoning condition shall be considered an amendment to the zoning ordinance and shall be subject to the requirements of this chapter. 19.90.030 - Determination of council. The Magna Metro Township Council, after review of the recommendation of the planning commission, may approve, deny, alter or remand for further review and consideration any application for zone change referred to the council by the planning commission. Planning Staff has reviewed the rezone request and has recommended approval of the proposed rezone. This recommendation is based upon the Magna General Plan map which identifies this area along a significant corridor that can sustain higher density; the project s potential contribution to several of the goals and objectives identified in the Magna General Plan; and the proposals connection to the master planned community to the north.
File # 30317 Rezone Summary and Recommendation Public Body: Magna Metro Township Council Meeting Date: July 18, 2017 Parcel ID: 1416400006 Current Zone: A-20 Proposed Zone: M-2 Property Address: 7525 West Tempo Road Request: A-20 to M-2 Rezone Community Council: Magna Planner: Tom C. Zumbado Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval Planning Staff Recommendation: Approval Applicant Names: Tyler Whiting & Brittany Patterson Township: Magna Metro Township PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tyler Whiting & Brittany Patterson are requesting a rezone for a split-zoned parcel. The request will allow the entire parcel to be zoned M-2, thus mirroring a neighboring parcel (also owned by the applicant) and facilitating a future conditional use application for a contractor equipment storage yard. SITE & VICINITY DESCRIPTION (see attached map) The property for File #30317 is located in the primarily industrial/agricultural area of the Magna Metro Township, north of Highway 201. The parcel for this property is split-zoned into two sections: A-20 and M-2. The parcel is also bifurcated by Tempo Road. It is immediately neighbored to the North, west and south by M-2 zoning, and afterward ringed by large tracts of A-20 zoning. To the east is an A-20 zoned parcel, followed by Salt Lake City (across 7500 West).
Request: A-20 to M-2 Rezone File #: 30317 Rezone Request Summary Page 2 of 5
Request: A-20 to M-2 Rezone File #: 30317 ZONE CONSIDERATIONS Height Requirement Existing Zone (A-20) Proposed Zone (M-2) No structure in the A-20 zone shall exceed a height equal to the distance between such structure and the nearest property line of the parcel. None Front Yard Setback 50 Feet 20 Feet Side Yard Setback 20 Feet None Rear Yard Setback 50 Feet None Lot Width 200 Feet None Lot Area 20 Acres None GENERAL PLAN CONSIDERATIONS Currently, the Magna General Plan Map identifies this property as a Stable area. However, this area is a commonly accepted industrial area for the Magna Metro Township and the approval of this project may contribute to a goal in the general plan: Objective 4.3 : Recapture sales revenue lost to neighboring municipalities through strategic commercial development, strengthening employment opportunities within the community. File #30317: General Plan Map (Project Parcel Outlined in Red). Rezone Request Summary Page 3 of 5
Request: A-20 to M-2 Rezone File #: 30317 NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE As of July 6 2017, there has been one favorable response to File #30317. PLANNING COMMISSION RESPONSE At their regularly scheduled meeting on May 11 th 2017, the Magna Metro Township Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of File #30317 to the Magna Metro Township Council. PLANNING STAFF ANALYSIS County Ordinance 19.52 (A-20 Zone) Staff has verified that the proposed Contractor equipment storage yard or plant, or rental of equipment used by contractors use is not listed in either the permitted or conditional uses for the A-20 Zone. County Ordinance 19.68 (M-2 Zone) Staff has verified that the proposed Contractor equipment storage yard or plant, or rental of equipment used by contractors use is listed as a conditional use in the M-2 Zone. County Ordinance 19.90 (Amendments and Rezoning) The county council may amend the number, shape, boundaries or area of any zone or any regulation within any zone. Any such amendment shall not be made or become effective unless the same shall have been proposed by or be first submitted for the recommendation of the relevant planning commission. Magna General Plan The overall intent of this general plan is to make the planning process simple, fair, efficient, and predictable. For each area of the County it spells out what kind of development is considered desirable and appropriate. Goal 4: Promote the development of viable commercial, employment, and activity centers to serve the community. Magna General Plan Map 1. The Official Map is intended to serve as a guide to areas of anticipated and desired stability or growth absorption. 2. The Official Map should be used in conjunction with the Best Practices and the Context sections of the General Plan when making planning decisions. 3. The colors shown on the Official Map indicate a range in the level of stability and intensity of and activity within the Township. 4. The colors shown on the Official Map do not relate to any particular land use or zoning designation. 5. The Zoning Map, rather than the Official Map, should be used to make changes to specific land uses. 6. This Official Map format does not allow staff at the Planning and Development Services desk to suggest whether or not a proposed zone change will be approved. Rezone Request Summary Page 4 of 5
Request: A-20 to M-2 Rezone File #: 30317 7. When making planning decisions: a. Locate the proposed change on the Official Map. b. Determine the anticipated level of stability and intensity of the area in which the proposed change occurs (Green, Blue, Yellow, Red, and Corridor) c. Determine if the proposed change would result in a level of change that is consistent with the Official Map. d. Determine if the proposed change is consistent with the relevant Best Practice(s) Core Concepts and Key Questions. e. Determine whether or not to recommend or approve the proposed change. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION After a close review of all the necessary steps for rezoning, it is the recommendation of Planning Staff that the Magna Metro Township Council grant approval to File #30317 to create a single M-2 zoning category for Parcel #1416400006. Rezone Request Summary Page 5 of 5
File #30317: Aerial Photograph A-20 to M-2 Rezone Request, 7525 west Tempo Road, Magna (Subject Property Outlined in Red).
MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO., 2017 AN ORDINANCE, AMENDING TITLE 19, ENTITLED "ZONING" OF THE MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP CODE OF ORDINANCES, 2001, BY RECLASSIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED IN MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP FROM THE A-20 ZONE to the M- 2ZONE follows: The Magna Metro Township Council of Salt Lake County, State of Utah, ordains as Section 1: Section, 19.06.020, The Zoning Map of Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County Code of Ordinances 2001, is hereby amended, as follows: The property described in Application #30317 filed by Tyler Whiting and located at approximately 7525 West Tempo Road within Magna Metro Township of Salt Lake County, is hereby reclassified from the A-20 zone to the M-2 zone, said property being described as follows: PARCEL # 14-16-400-006 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: COMMENCING 100 FEET SOUTH AND 78 FEET WEST FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN, AND RUNNING THENCE WEST 139 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 400 FEET; THENCE EAST 78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 200 FEET; THENCE EAST 61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 200 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS AND EXCEPTING ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN TEMPO ROAD. Section 2: The map showing such change shall be filed with the Magna Metro Township Planning Commission in accordance with Section 19.06.020 of the Magna Metro Township Code of Ordinances, 2001.
Section 3: This ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its passage and upon at least one publication in a newspaper published in and having general circulation in Magna Metro Township of Salt Lake County, and if not so published within fifteen (15) days then it shall take effect immediately upon its first publication. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Magna Metro Township Council has approved, passed and adopted this ordinance this day of, 2017. MAGNA METRO TOWNSHIP COUNCIL ATTESTED: By: Dan Peay, Chair Magna Metro Township Council Sherrie Swensen, Metro Township Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM By Metro Township Attorney Date : Ordinance published in newspaper: Date: Effective date of ordinance: Magna Metro Township Council Member Ferguson voting Magna Metro Township Council Member Hull voting Magna Metro Township Council Member Peay voting Magna Metro Township Council Member Peel voting Magna Metro Township Council Member Prokopis voting