Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission

Similar documents
Executive Summary. Attachments: Amendment Summary, Map Series

Attachments: Resolution, Staff Report, Map Series, Agency Comments, Site Photos, Basis of Review and Application

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUMMARY BACKGROUND RECOMMENDATION

Resolution setting an adoption public hearing for map amendment PC/CPA located on West Johnson Road, west of James L.

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M

Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission

Resolution Item: HC/CPA Lithia Pinecrest and Valrico Road

FUTURE LAND USE. City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendments

ORDINANCE NO URBAN CORRIDOR AMENDMENTS

Meeting Date: April 10, 2017 Agenda Item: HC/CPA 17-03: Thompson Road, west of State Road 39 Presenter: Krista Kelly ext. 328 Action Necessary: Yes

2nd Cycle 2012 Amendment Summary

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. The Honorable Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 10A

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: October 8, 2013 AGENDA ITEM NO. 20v-C,

MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM #6b

Planning Commission Public Hearing May 14, nd Cycle 2012 Amendment Report CPA Future Land Use Map change. I-75 and Big Bend Road I. PROPOS

CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG DCA#11-2ESR

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 4F

LAND USE. General Plan Update Working Paper January In this Working Paper. Page

City File ZM th Street North St. Petersburg, FL Central Avenue, Suite 1600 St. Petersburg, FL 33701

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

SECTION 4 ZONING DISTRICTS

Required and optional elements of comprehensive plan; studies and surveys.

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT

Land Use. Land Use Categories. Chart 5.1. Nepeuskun Existing Land Use Inventory. Overview

Plans shall be drawn at a readable scale, signed, and sealed by a Florida Registered Engineer. The application package shall include:

LAKE NONA PARCEL 10 & 11

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Unlimited. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2188

SECTION I AMENDMENT REPORT BROWARD COUNTY LAND USE PLAN TEXT PROPOSED AMENDMENT PCT BrowardNext Corrective Amendments RECOMMENDATIONS/ACTIONS

MIDWAY CITY Municipal Code

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS Staff Report May 16, 2017

Mohave County General Plan

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE PANAMA CITY BEACH COMPREHENSIVE GROWTH DEVELOPMENT PLAN

DRAFT Subject to Modifications

SECTION 3. Housing. Appendix A LAND USE DEFINITIONS

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

B. Subarea Provisions, including the Design Elements and Area of Special Concern and Potential Park/Open Space/Recreation Requirements;

STAFF REPORT City of Ormond Beach Department of Planning

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT August 18, 2016

Board of County Commissioners Agenda Request

ZONING CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY SHEET

4 August 13, 2014 Public Hearing

DETERMINATION OF NONCONFORMITY

MEMORANDUM! AGENDA ITEM #IV.C

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

Affordable Housing Plan

PUBLIC DRAFT May 2017 Zoning Districts Use Regulations Definitions (partial)

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

STAFF REPORT. Community Development Director PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076

MEMORANDUM. Mr. Sean Tabibian, Esq. Dana A. Sayles, AICP, three6ixty Olivia Joncich, three6ixty. DATE May 26, 2017

CHAPTER 50 LAND USE ZONES ARTICLE 50 BASIC PROVISIONS

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

Staff Report. Planning Commission Public Hearing: October 17, 2007 Staff Recommendation: Denial

United States Post Office and Multi-Family Residential; and, Single- Family Residence with an Apartment

1. Future Land Use FLU6.6.8 Land uses within the Rural Service Area portion of the Wekiva Study Area shall be limited to very low and low intensity

Location Map S U M M A RY A N X G M P Z O N I TEM #2. Subject Site

TOOELE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE CHAPTER 31 Page 1

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 3, 2014

HENDRY COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX S. MAIN STREET LABELLE, FLORIDA (863) FAX: (863)

Title 6 - Local Government Provisions Applicable to Special Purpose Districts and Other Political Subdivisions

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Regional Planning Council Members AGENDA ITEM 5J

BROWARD COUNTY LAND USE PLAN 2016 TEXT AMENDMENT PCT 16-6

PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM. TO: Development Review Committee DATE: 5/26/11 FILE: PGM11-86 SUBJECT:

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

STAFF REPORT. City of Ormond Beach Department of Planning. Exception for Outdoor Activity

SPECIAL USE (ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PERMIT) (WAIVER REQUIRED)

AGENDA ITEM. Two Separate Public Hearings relating to the Eighth Avenue S./Orange Place Enclave Annexation

Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet

ARTICLE 9: VESTING DETERMINATION, NONCONFORMITIES AND VARIANCES. Article History 2 SECTION 9.01 PURPOSE 3

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 9, 2015

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

RECITALS. WHEREAS, the GMA requires counties to adopt county-wide planning policies in cooperation with cities within the County; and

RESOLUTION NO

THE GROVE GOLF CLUB PLAT

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: July 19, 2018

CHAPTER 3 REGULATIONS INSIDE THE COASTAL ZONE

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

3. Proof of Publication and Waive the Reading of the Legal Advertisement.

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 3, 2016

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NOS: B.1-B.3 STAFF: MEGGAN HERINGTON

ZONING AMENDMENT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: August 8, 2013

CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: November 1, 2018 Ordinance 24, 2018 / *Ordinance 25, 2018

Land Use, Transportation, and Infrastructure Committee of the Denver City Council FROM: Scott Robinson, Senior City Planner DATE: March 22, 2018 RE:

City of Oshkosh Zoning Update

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Laurier Enterprises, Inc. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

13 Sectional Map Amendment

Implementation. Approved Master Plan and SMA for Henson Creek-South Potomac 103

Comprehensive Plan Amendment #PLN , Reserve at Cannon Branch (Coles Magisterial District)

BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE MAKING REVISIONS TO CHAPTERS 2 THROUGH 5 OF TITLE XI OF THE WESTMINSTER MUNICIPAL CODE

Growth Management Protecting the. Florida Keys

Transcription:

Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission 601 E Kennedy Blvd., 18 th floor, Tampa, Florida, 33601 813-272-5940 theplanningcommission.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Meeting Date: October 13, 2014 Agenda Item: Tampa: Briefing on Tampa Plan Amendments TA/CPA 14-04, 14-05, and 14-06 Presenters: Rose Petrucha, Tony Garcia, Tony LaColla Action Necessary: No SUMMARY: Three privately-initiated plan amendment requests to amend the Tampa Comprehensive Plan are currently under review by staff. Two of the privately-initiated map amendments are being reviewed as small-scale map amendments, while the third is a text amendment that will be subject to state and regional review. The Planning Commission, pursuant to Florida Statutes and Laws of Florida, is required to provide recommendations to the Tampa City Council on all proposed changes to the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. Plan Amendment TA/CPA 14-04 is a privately-initiated, text amendment request to modify an Objective and related Policies to the Rattlesnake Point area within the Future Land Use Section of Chapter 3 of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. (Presenter: Rose Petrucha) Plan Amendment TA/CPA 14-05 is a privately-initiated, small-scale map amendment to the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, requesting a change to the Future Land Use Map from Heavy Industrial (HI), to Community Mixed Use 35 (CMU-35) for a site located in the general area of Fowler Avenue and 46 th Street. (Presenter: Tony Garcia, AICP) Plan Amendment TA/CPA 14-06 is a privately-initiated small-scale map amendment to the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, requesting a change to the Future Land Use Map from Community Mixed Use-35(CMU-35) to Community Commercial-35 (CC-35). (Presenter: Tony LaColla, AICP) RECOMMENDATION: This item is for your information only. No action is required. A public hearing is scheduled for November 10, 2014 at 5:30 pm. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment Summaries and Map Series

Text Amendment pertaining to Land Use Policies for Rattlesnake Point/ Future Redevelopment Submittal Cycle August 2014 An amendment to the Tampa Comprehensive Plan pertaining to the Objective and Policies for the redevelopment of the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area has been privately initiated for the August 2014 submittals. The Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area was the subject of several amendments to the Tampa Comprehensive Plan in 2006. Planning Commission transmitted proposed amendment to State Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for review. After receipt of DCA report, final policy language was negotiated by the City Attorney and representatives for all the affected property owners on Rattlesnake Point. In 2007, the Tampa City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2007-41 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment PA 06-04) which set out the policy direction of the City for the future redevelopment of the area as a long-term transition involving all property owners on Rattlesnake Point. The policies required a transition plan to be developed involving all property owners. A single property owner of the original group of applicants, Viper Ventures, LLC, has initiated this text amendment to modify the text to facilitate the redevelopment on the area. Tampa: TACPA 14-04 Text Amendment Pertaining to Policies for Rattlesnake Point Page 1 of 1 Amendment Summary August 2014

Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan Requested Amendment Objective 20.8: Encourage the transition of the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area from its current heavy industrial and light industrial use to a residential/commercial mixed-use waterfront community in a safe and fair manner. The Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area is that area located west of Westshore Boulevard on Tyson Avenue, as shown here. (Note: Aerial of rattlesnake point was moved in formatting of document. Relocate back with this policy.) Policy 20.8.1: Protect any future residential and commercial users from the hazardous or toxic heavy industrial uses along Tyson Avenue, the only exit from the peninsula comprising the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area, by not allowing any residential uses until the hazardous or toxic heavy industrial uses are permanently relocated (except for Federal government uses) from the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area. Policy 20.8.2: The City of Tampa will complete an area-wide transition plan ( Transition Plan ) for the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area. The Transition Plan will identify a vision, strategy, appropriate land mix, densities/ intensities, parks and open space opportunities, requirements for waterfront access and any other measures to facilitate the orderly transition of the area to a mixed-use residential/commercial waterfront development community. The City will provide an opportunity for all property owners within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area to participate in the development of the Transition Plan. Policy 20.8.3: Permit existing industrial uses on lands designated CMU - 35 sufficient time and opportunity to relocate by allowing those industrial uses to be deemed legally conforming. Objective 20.8: Encourage the transition of the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area from its current mix of heavy industrial and light industrial use to a residential/commercial mixed-use uses to a mix of residential/commercial/retail uses in a waterfront community in a safe and fair manner that protects public health, safety and welfare. The Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area is that area located west of Westshore Boulevard on Tyson Avenue, as shown here. Policy 20.8.1: Protect any future residential and commercial users from the hazardous or toxic heavy industrial uses along Tyson Avenue, the only exit from the peninsula comprising the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area, by not allowing any residential uses until the hazardous or toxic heavy industrial uses are permanently relocated (except for Federal government uses) from the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area. Rezonings within the CMU-35 land use category shall be approved through the PD zoning process. Policy 20.8.2: The City of Tampa will complete an area-wide transition plan ( Transition Plan ) for the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area. The Transition Plan will identify a vision, strategy, appropriate land mix, densities/ intensities, parks and open space opportunities, requirements for waterfront access and any other measures to facilitate the orderly transition of the area to a mixed-use residential/commercial waterfront development community. The City will provide an opportunity for all property owners within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area to participate in the development of the Transition Plan. Policy 20.8.3: Permit existing industrial uses on lands designated CMU - 35 sufficient time and opportunity to relocate by allowing those industrial uses to be deemed legally conforming. Rattlesnake Point /Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan and Amendment 8.1.2014 Submittal Page 1 of 6

Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan Requested Amendment Policy 20.8.4: Notwithstanding policy 6 of this section, no new heavy industrial uses or expansions of currently existing heavy industrial uses shall be permitted on property designated CMU 35 within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area unless allowed pursuant to land development regulations enacted pursuant to policy 6 or approval of an enforceable development agreement pursuant to policy 7 of this section. This policy shall not apply to existing lawful uses on property within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area which is designated Industrial General (IG) or Industrial Heavy (IH) zoning. Policy 20.8.5: For property within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area which is designated CMU-35, allow uses permitted in the Industrial General (IG) zoning district on property that is currently industrial zoned until such time as the parcel is rezoned for residential use. This policy shall not affect the existing lawful uses of other property within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area which is designated Industrial General (IG) or Industrial Heavy (IH) zoning. Policy 20.8.4 20.8.2: Notwithstanding policy 20.8.6 of this section, no new heavy industrial uses or expansions of currently existing heavy industrial uses (other than those uses permitted in the office and commercial zoning districts of the City Code) shall be permitted on property designated CMU 35 within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area unless allowed pursuant to land development regulations enacted as part of a Planned Development zoning pursuant to policy 6 or approval of an enforceable development agreement pursuant to policy 7 of this section 20.8.1. This policy shall not apply to existing lawful uses on property within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area which is designated has an Industrial General (IG) or Industrial Heavy (IH) zoning Land Use. Policy 20.8.5 20.8.3: For property within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area which is designated CMU-35, allow uses permitted in the Industrial General (IG) zoning district on property that is currently industrial zoned until such time as the parcel is rezoned for residential use. This policy shall not affect the existing lawful uses of other property within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area which is designated Industrial General (IG) or Industrial Heavy (IH) zoning uses allowed within the CMU-35 land use through the PD zoning process. Rattlesnake Point /Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan and Amendment 8.1.2014 Submittal Page 2 of 6

Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan Requested Amendment Policy 20.8.6: Amend land development regulations to include criteria for reviewing/ approving requests for rezonings that propose collocation of light industrial and residential/commercial uses once all heavy industrial uses have been permanently relocated from the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area. Such criteria shall include requirements for a site plan rezoning and shall require a development agreement that addresses the timing of development to meet the requirements of policy 1 of this section, mitigation of transportation impacts, and other issues deemed necessary or appropriate by the City. Co-location of industrial uses and residential/commercial is allowed only during the transition period that is established pursuant to a site plan rezoning and attendant development agreement. Otherwise, upon site plan rezoning a parcel to a residential use, industrial uses shall not be allowed as permitted uses or special uses on that parcel. Policy 20.8.6 20.8.4: Amend land development regulations to include criteria for reviewing/ The City when reviewing/ approving requests for rezonings that propose collocation of light industrial and residential/commercial uses once all heavy industrial uses have been permanently relocated from the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area. Such criteria shall include requirements for a site plan rezoning and shall require a development agreement that addresses the timing of development to meet the requirements of policy 1 of this section, pursuant to policy 20.8.1, that propose co-location of existing and new uses in the same Planned Development site plan in the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area, shall review the timing of the development s mitigation of transportation impacts, and other issues deemed necessary or appropriate by the City and consideration of reasonable public access to the waterfront. Co-location of industrial uses and residential/commercial is shall be allowed only during the transition period that is established of Rattlesnake Point pursuant to a site plan rezoning and attendant development agreement rezonings. Otherwise, upon site plan rezoning a parcel to a residential use, industrial uses shall not be allowed as permitted uses or special uses on that parcel. Rattlesnake Point /Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan and Amendment 8.1.2014 Submittal Page 3 of 6

Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan Requested Amendment Policy 20.8.7: Until such time as the City adopts regulations as provided in policy 6 of this section, no rezoning application on property designated CMU- 35 will be approved unless the property owner and the City enter into a development agreement that: (a) provides for timing of development that accomplishes the objectives of policy 1 above; (b) provides for the mitigation of related impacts consistent with applicable law; and (c) provides for the consideration of reasonable public access to the waterfront. If the rezoning is to a district which would allow residential or commercial uses, the site plan and/or development agreement shall require that heavy industrial uses no longer exist in the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area (except for Federal government uses) prior to issuance of a building permit. If a specific and detailed enforceable transition plan is adequately provided for in a development agreement sufficient to assure permanent elimination of the risk of heavy industrial hazardous uses prior to occupancy then such permanent relocation may be required prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy rather than a building permit. Policy 20.8.7 20.8.5 : Until such time as the City adopts regulations as provided in policy 6 of this section, no rezoning application on property designated CMU- 35 will be approved unless the property owner and the City enter into a development agreement that: (a) provides for timing of development that accomplishes the objectives of policy 1 above; (b) provides for the mitigation of related impacts consistent with applicable law; and (c) provides for the consideration of reasonable public access to the waterfront. If the rezoning is to a district which would allow residential or commercial uses, the site plan and/or development agreement shall require that heavy industrial uses no longer exist in the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area (except for Federal government uses) prior to issuance of a building permit. If a specific and detailed enforceable transition plan is adequately provided for in a development agreement sufficient to assure permanent elimination of the risk of heavy industrial hazardous uses prior to occupancy then such permanent relocation may be required prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy rather than a building permit. Rezoning applications on property designated CMU-35 within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area may be approved pursuant to policy 20.8.1, and PD zoning conditions addressing: (a) the mitigation of related impacts consistent with applicable law; (b) the consideration of reasonable public access to the waterfront; (c) where proposed PD rezonings abut existing heavy industrial uses that are hazardous to public health and safety, demonstration through design and accepted practices that the occupants of the new use shall not be unduly at risk from such hazards; and (d) where the PD includes existing light industrial uses, indication of any planned phased transition of such uses within the PD as development progresses. Rattlesnake Point /Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan and Amendment 8.1.2014 Submittal Page 4 of 6

Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan Requested Amendment Policy 20.8.8: Notwithstanding if Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area is located in a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area, any and all rezonings and/or development agreements shall also address the mitigation of transportation impacts in a manner consistent with the comprehensive plan and all applicable land development regulations. Such mitigation will be separate from the payment of transportation impact fees, but shall be eligible for impact fee credit as and if provided for in City of Tampa Code of Ordinances. The City may allow transportation impacts to be mitigated by way of contribution to mass transit or other multimodal solutions, if permitted by applicable law. Policy 20.8.9: Residential development within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area shall be required to mitigate its impact on hurricane shelter space. Policy 20.8.10: Except as otherwise permitted by land development regulations enacted pursuant to policy 6 of this section or an enforceable development agreement approved pursuant to policy 7, no building permits shall be issued for residential uses on property designated CMU-35 in the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area until heavy industrial uses (except for Federal government uses) permanently cease operations within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area, as provided in policy 1 above. Policy 20.8.8 20.8.6: Notwithstanding if the fact that the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area is located in a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area, any and all rezonings and/or development agreements shall also address the mitigation of transportation impacts in a manner consistent with the comprehensive plan and all applicable land development regulations. Such mitigation will be separate from the payment of transportation impact fees, but shall be eligible for impact fee credit as if and if as provided for in City of Tampa Code of Ordinances. The City may allow transportation impacts to be mitigated by way of contribution to mass transit or other multimodal solutions, (such as bus or rapid transit stops, ferry or other means of transportation, for example) and other means if and as permitted by applicable law. Policy 20.8.9 20.8.7: Residential development within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area shall be required to mitigate its impact on hurricane shelter space. Policy 20.8.10: Except as otherwise permitted by land development regulations enacted pursuant to policy 6 of this section or an enforceable development agreement approved pursuant to policy 7, no building permits shall be issued for residential uses on property designated CMU-35 in the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area until heavy industrial uses (except for Federal government uses) permanently cease operations within the Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Area, as provided in policy 1 above. Rattlesnake Point /Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan and Amendment 8.1.2014 Submittal Page 5 of 6

Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan Requested Amendment Tampa City Council Ordinance 2007-41 (February 8, 2007) Figure 1: Rattlesnake Point Waterfront Redevelopment Area Rattlesnake Point /Current Policy Directive as identified in Tampa Comprehensive Plan and Amendment 8.1.2014 Submittal Page 6 of 6

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUEST FOR MAP AMENDMENT TA/CPA 14-05 AMENDMENT SUMMARY TA/CPA 14-05: Future Land Use Map Change 11316 N. 46 th Street in the City of Tampa. Description of Request: This is a privately-initiated plan amendment consisting of an approximately 9.77+ acre parcel located near the southwest corner of North 46 th Street and East Fowler Avenue. The applicant is requesting a land use plan amendment from Heavy Industrial (HI) to Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35). The current site is utilized for storage and additional parking for the existing industrial use located directly to the south of the subject site. Development Impact: The current land use designation primarily allows for general and intensive commercial, research/corporate parks and light and heavy industrial uses. The proposed CMU-35 category provides for general commercial, professional office, and multi-family development. Residential development may be guided by either density or Floor Area Ratio (FAR). The maximum FAR currently allowed within the Heavy Industrial (HI) Future Land Use category is 1.5. Residential development is not permitted under the Heavy Industrial Future Land category. An amendment to the applicant s land-use category from HI to CMU-35 would allow for consideration of a mixture of uses, including residential uses, for the subject site. Planning District - The applicant s site is located within the University Planning District. The Central Tampa Planning District offers many opportunities to attract private investment, including residential investment while protecting existing stable single family residential areas. Other opportunities include transforming development patterns along major corridors while also accommodating the influx of commuters and improving mobility. Other Considerations The subject site is located within the boundaries of the Terrace Park/University Square Vision Plan area. Folio #: 140503.0000 11316 North 46 th Street TA/CPA 14-05

Potential Impacts of Current and Proposed Future Land Use Categories The potential impacts of the change from Heavy Industrial (HI) to Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) plan categories are illustrated in the chart below. TA/CPA 13-03 Maximum Density Development Potential Typical Uses Maximum Floor Area Ratio Current Land Use Category Heavy Industrial (HI) Acres: 9.77± Residential development is not permitted. Residential development is not permitted. Typical uses in the HI land use category include industrial or manufacturing that may occur within or outside of a building; general and intensive commercial, uses. Office, retail and service uses that provide support to employees; and compatible public, quasi-public, and special uses. This designation should not be located adjacent to a residential neighborhood or center without substantial buffers. Maximum FAR of 1.5 will allow consideration of 638,371 square feet of non-residential uses. Proposed Land Use Category Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) Up to a maximum of 35 dwelling units per gross acre can be considered. An allowable maximum residential density of 35 dwelling units per gross acre could allow 341 dwelling units. To encourage a true mixture of uses residential development can be guided by either density or FAR. Typical uses in the CMU-35 land use category include general commercial, professional office, and multi-family development. (by either density or floor area ratio); gathering places such as a plaza, courtyard, or park; and compatible public, quasi-public, and special uses. Maximum FAR of 2.0 will allow consideration of 851,162 square feet of non-residential uses subject to performance standards being met. To encourage a true mixture of uses residential development can be guided by either density or FAR. 11316 North 46 th Street TA/CPA 14-05

USF SYCAMORE DR USF MAPLE DR PA 14-05 LEGEND ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY S DR SUNRI D TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA GE P A F ALUMNI DR LM BRUCE B DOWNS BLVD IA DR NOL AG USF M US AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY PLAN AMENDMENT AREA N 52ND ST N 46TH ST AH URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. MAJOR ROADS: Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan. See Adopted MPO Long Range Transportation Plan for specific improvements. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. 0 325 650 1,300 1,950 2,600 Feet AUHTOR: C.WELSH Date: 9/22/2014 G:\gisroot\Projects\Cathy\Arcmap\NEW_MXD\TCpa\tcpa1405aerial.mxd OM TA K E 98TH AVE TRL N OJUS DR E LINEBAUGH AVE CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, 2006. The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. N MYRTLE ST E SERENA DR N OKLAWAHA AVE E BOUGAINVILLEA AVE E WHITEWAY DR N CONNECHUSETT RD N 30TH ST MCKINLEY DR E FOWLER AVE 1ST ST N 5 N 50TH ST TRUM BLVD EC SP E TEMPLE HEIGHTS RD µ

USF PALMS N 52ND ST BRUCE B DOWNS BLVD MAGNOLIA DR USF ALUMNI USF MAPLE DR USF SYCAMORE DR S D R E U NRID G EXISTING LAND USE Derived from Property Appraiser Parcels and NAL DOR Codes PA 14-05 LEGEND SINGLE FAMILY / MOBILE HOME TWO FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY MOBILE HOME PARK VACANT PUBLIC / QUASIPUBLIC / INSTITUTIONS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS / UTILITIES SPECTRUM BLVD DR RIGHT OF WAY/ROADS/HIGHWAYS EDUCATIONAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL LIGHT COMMERCIAL E FOWLER AVE N 50TH ST HEAVY INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL N 51ST ST MINING RECREATION / OPEN SPACE AGRICULTURAL NATURAL WATER UNKNOWN NOT CLASSIFIED MCKINLEY DR E WHITEWAY DR ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COCKROACH BAY AQUATIC PRESERVE BOUNDARY COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY PLAN AMENDMENT AREA N 30TH ST E BOUGAINVILLEA AVE N 46TH ST N CONNECHUSETT RD N OJUS DR N OKLAWAHA AVE E SERENA DR N MYRTLE ST MAJOR ROADS: See Adopted MPO Long Range Transportation Plan for specific improvements. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. national map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. This map is for illustrative purposes only for the cities of Tampa, Temple Terrace and Plant City. INSET ON COUNTYWIDE: EGMONT KEY is not shown in exact location. 0 340 680 1,360 2,040 2,720 Feet E LINEBAUGH AVE E 98TH AVE TRL TAKOMAH AUTHOR: C.WELSH Date: 9/22/2014 G:\gisroot\Projects\Cathy\Arcmap\NEW_MXD\TCpa\tcpa1405elu.mxd µ

N 52ND ST BRUCE B DOWNS BLVD UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY USF PINE DR USF MAGNOLIA DR SPECTRUM BLVD USF ALUMNI DR LEROY COLLINS BLVD USF MAPLE DR USF SYCAMORE DR UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY TEMPLE TERRACE RURAL ESTATE - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 3 RESIDENTIAL - 6 RESIDENTIAL - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 20 RESIDENTIAL - 35 RESIDENTIAL - 50 RESIDENTIAL - 83 SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 3 ADOPTED 2025 FUTURE LAND USE PA 14-05 (.25 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.50 FAR) (.60 FAR) (1.0 FAR) (.65 FAR) (.25 FAR) LEGEND TEMPLE TERRACE RESIDENTIAL-4 (4 DU/ACRE) RESIDENTIAL-9 (9 DU/ACRE) RESIDENTIAL-18 (18 DU/ACRE) COMMUNITY MIXED USE-12 (12 DU/ACRE) URBAN MIXED USE-20 (20 DU/ACRE) OFFICE/INSTITUTIONAL DOWNTOWN MIXED USE-25 (25 DU/ACRE) (1.5 TO 4.5 FAR) COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 6 (.50 FAR) RESEARCH/CORPORATE PARK GENERAL MIXED USE -24 PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC E FOWLER AVE URBAN MIXED USE - 60 COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 (3.25 FAR) (2.0 FAR) PARK/RECREATION OPEN SPACE WATER N 50TH ST N 51ST ST TRANSITIONAL USE - 24 REGIONAL MIXED USE - 100 AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL MAJOR RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE MAJOR PUBLIC/SEMI - PUBLIC (3.5 FAR) (2.0 FAR) RIGHT OF WAY TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION) UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY RESIDENTIAL - 20 (.35 FAR) REGIONAL MIXED USE - 35 (2.0 FAR) OFFICE COMMERCIAL - 20 (.75 FAR) PUBLIC / QUASI-PUBLIC MAJOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES MCKINLEY DR CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE WATER RIGHT OF WAY COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK E WHITEWAY DR TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION) COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY PLAN AMENDMENT AREA N 30TH ST E BOUGAINVILLEA AVE N 46TH ST N CONNECHUSETT RD N OJUS DR E LINEBAUGH AVE E 98TH AVE N OKLAWAHA AVE N PAWNEE AVE TRL E SERENA DR E POINSETTIA AVE TAKOMAH N MYRTLE ST TEMPLE TERRACE 2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Originally Adopted - June 08, 2009. Jurisdicitonal areas updated by plan amendment. Effective to present. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT: Hillsborough County Planning and Growth Management. Effective to Present. WETLANDS: Southwest Florida Water Management District. Wetland features over 40 acres extracted from 2004 Land Use Land Cover. MAJOR ROADS: Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan. See Adopted MPO Long Range Transportation Plan for specific improvements. CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, 2006. The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. 0 405 810 1,620 2,430 3,240 AUTHOR: C.WELSH Date: 9/22/2014 G:\gisroot\Projects\Cathy\Arcmap\NEW_MXD\TCpa\tcpa1405flu_adopted.mxd Feet µ

N 52ND ST BRUCE B DOWNS BLVD UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY USF PINE DR USF MAGNOLIA DR SPECTRUM BLVD USF ALUMNI DR LEROY COLLINS BLVD USF MAPLE DR USF SYCAMORE DR UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY TEMPLE TERRACE RURAL ESTATE - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 3 RESIDENTIAL - 6 RESIDENTIAL - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 20 RESIDENTIAL - 35 RESIDENTIAL - 50 RESIDENTIAL - 83 SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 3 ADOPTED 2025 FUTURE LAND USE PA 14-05 (.25 FAR) (.35 FAR) FROM: HEAVY INDUTRIAL TO: COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 (.35 FAR) (.50 FAR) (.60 FAR) (1.0 FAR) (.65 FAR) (.25 FAR) LEGEND TEMPLE TERRACE RESIDENTIAL-4 (4 DU/ACRE) RESIDENTIAL-9 (9 DU/ACRE) RESIDENTIAL-18 (18 DU/ACRE) COMMUNITY MIXED USE-12 (12 DU/ACRE) URBAN MIXED USE-20 (20 DU/ACRE) OFFICE/INSTITUTIONAL DOWNTOWN MIXED USE-25 (25 DU/ACRE) (1.5 TO 4.5 FAR) COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 6 (.50 FAR) RESEARCH/CORPORATE PARK GENERAL MIXED USE -24 PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC E FOWLER AVE URBAN MIXED USE - 60 (3.25 FAR) PARK/RECREATION OPEN SPACE N 50TH ST N 51ST ST COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 TRANSITIONAL USE - 24 REGIONAL MIXED USE - 100 AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL MAJOR RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE MAJOR PUBLIC/SEMI - PUBLIC (2.0 FAR) (3.5 FAR) (2.0 FAR) WATER RIGHT OF WAY TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION) UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY RESIDENTIAL - 20 (.35 FAR) REGIONAL MIXED USE - 35 (2.0 FAR) OFFICE COMMERCIAL - 20 (.75 FAR) PUBLIC / QUASI-PUBLIC MCKINLEY DR MAJOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE WATER RIGHT OF WAY ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK E WHITEWAY DR TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION) COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY PLAN AMENDMENT AREA N 30TH ST E BOUGAINVILLEA AVE N 46TH ST N CONNECHUSETT RD N OJUS DR E LINEBAUGH AVE E 98TH AVE N OKLAWAHA AVE N PAWNEE AVE TRL E SERENA DR E POINSETTIA AVE TAKOMAH N MYRTLE ST TEMPLE TERRACE 2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Originally Adopted - June 08, 2009. Jurisdicitonal areas updated by plan amendment. Effective to present. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT: Hillsborough County Planning and Growth Management. Effective to Present. WETLANDS: Southwest Florida Water Management District. Wetland features over 40 acres extracted from 2004 Land Use Land Cover. MAJOR ROADS: Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan. See Adopted MPO Long Range Transportation Plan for specific improvements. CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, 2006. The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. 0 405 810 1,620 2,430 3,240 AUTHOR: C.WELSH Date: 9/22/2014 G:\gisroot\Projects\Cathy\Arcmap\NEW_MXD\TCpa\tcpa1405flu_proposed.mxd Feet µ

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUEST FOR MAP AMENDMENT TA/CPA 14-06 AMENDMENT SUMMARY TA/CPA 14-06: Future Land Use Map Change 3102 W. Hillsborough Avenue in the City of Tampa. Description of Request: This is a privately-initiated plan amendment consisting of one parcel located on the southwest corner of W. Hillsborough Ave. and N. MacDill Avenue. The applicant is requesting a land use plan amendment for a total of 0.46± acres from Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) to Community Commercial-35 (CC-35). The current site is used as a pawn shop. Development Impact: The current land use designation primarily allows for general commercial, professional office, and multi-family development. The proposed CC-35 category provides for all of the same uses as CMU-35 with the most significant change being that it also includes consideration of intensive commercial uses which allow for outdoor storage. Both land use categories encourage a mixture of uses. Residential development may be guided by either density or Floor Area Ratio (FAR). The maximum FAR currently allowed is 2.0; the maximum residential density allowed is 35 units/net acre. An amendment to the applicant s land-use category from CMU-35 to CC-35 would not increase the currently permissible residential density or nonresidential intensity. Planning District - The applicant s site is in the Central Tampa Planning District. The Central Tampa Planning District offers many opportunities to attract private investment, including supporting business/industrial development and improving mobility. Folio #: 107310.0000 3102 W. Hillsborough Avenue TA/CPA 14-06

Potential Impacts of Current and Proposed Future Land Use Categories The potential impacts of the change from Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) to Community Commercial-35 (CC-35) plan categories are illustrated in the chart below. TA/CPA 14-06 Maximum Density Development Potential Typical Uses Current Land Use Category Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) Acres: 0.46± Up to a maximum of 35 dwelling units per gross acre is allowed in this land-use category. An allowable maximum residential density of 35 dwelling units per gross acre could allow 15 dwelling units. Typical uses in the CMU-35 land use category include general commercial, service, office; residential uses (by either density or floor area ratio); gathering places such as a plaza, courtyard, or park; and compatible public, quasi-public, and special uses. Proposed Land Use Category Community Commercial-35 (CC-35) Up to a maximum of 35 dwelling units per gross acre is allowed in this land-use category. An allowable maximum residential density of 35 dwelling units per gross acre could allow 15 dwelling units. Typical uses in the CC-35 land use category include intensive and general commercial, service, office; residential uses (by either density or floor area ratio); gathering places such as a plaza, courtyard, or park; and compatible public, quasi-public, and special uses. Maximum Floor Area Ratio Maximum FAR of 2.0 will allow consideration of 39,204 square feet of neighborhood-serving commercial or office development subject to location criteria and performance standards. Maximum FAR of 2.0 will allow consideration of 39,204 square feet of neighborhood-serving commercial or office development subject to location criteria and performance standards. 3102 W. Hillsborough Avenue TA/CPA 14-06

SCORPIO CIR W PARIS ST W BURKE ST AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PA 14-06 W IDLEWI LD AVE LEGEND ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY W CLIFTON ST TAMPA SERVICE AREA W HENRY AVE URBAN SERVICE AREA COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY PLAN AMENDMENT AREA N TAMPANIA AVE N LINCOLN AVE W POWHATAN AVE W RIO VISTA AVE W COMANCHE AVE W FRIERSON AVE W CREST AVE W HAYA ST N GOMEZ AVE N MACDILL AVE N JAMAICA ST N MATANZAS AVE N SAINT VINCENT ST W GIDDENS AVE N HABANA AVE W HILLSBOROUGH AVE N ARMENIA AVE W MOHAWK AVE W WILDER AVE CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, 2006. The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. MAJOR ROADS: Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan. See Adopted MPO Long Range Transportation Plan for specific improvements. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. W VIOLET ST 0 165 330 660 990 1,320 Feet AUHTOR: C.WELSH Date: 9/22/2014 W LOUISIANA AVE W OSBORNE AVE G:\gisroot\Projects\Cathy\Arcmap\NEW_MXD\TCpa\tcpa1406aerial.mxd µ

W BURKE ST W PARIS ST SCORPIO CIR EXISTING LAND USE Derived from Property Appraiser Parcels and NAL DOR Codes PA 14-06 W IDLEWILD AVE LEGEND SINGLE FAMILY / MOBILE HOME TWO FAMILY W CLIFTON ST W HENRY AVE MULTI-FAMILY MOBILE HOME PARK VACANT PUBLIC / QUASIPUBLIC / INSTITUTIONS W POWHATAN AVE PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS / UTILITIES RIGHT OF WAY/ROADS/HIGHWAYS N LINCOLN AVE N TAMPANIA AVE W RIO VISTA AVE N SAINT PETER AVE W COMANCHE AVE W MOHAWK AVE EDUCATIONAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL LIGHT COMMERCIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL MINING RECREATION / OPEN SPACE AGRICULTURAL NATURAL N SAINT VINCENT ST N MATANZAS AVE N JAMAICA ST W GIDDENS AVE N MACDILL AVE W HILLSBOROUGH AVE W FRIERSON AVE W HAYA ST N HABANA AVE W CREST AVE N ARMENIA AVE WATER UNKNOWN NOT CLASSIFIED ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COCKROACH BAY AQUATIC PRESERVE BOUNDARY COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY PLAN AMENDMENT AREA N GOMEZ AVE W WILDER AVE MAJOR ROADS: See Adopted MPO Long Range Transportation Plan for specific improvements. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. national map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. This map is for illustrative purposes only for the cities of Tampa, Temple Terrace and Plant City. INSET ON COUNTYWIDE: EGMONT KEY is not shown in exact location. N GLEN AVE W LOUISIANA AVE W VIOLET ST 0 175 350 700 1,050 1,400 AUTHOR: C.WELSH Date: 9/22/2014 G:\gisroot\Projects\Cathy\Arcmap\NEW_MXD\TCpa\tcpa1406elu.mxd Feet W OSBORNE AVE µ

W PARIS ST W BURKE ST SCORPIO CIR ADOPTED 2025 FUTURE LAND USE PA 14-06 W IDLEWILD AVE LEGEND W CLIFTON ST W HENRY AVE RURAL ESTATE - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 3 RESIDENTIAL - 6 RESIDENTIAL - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 20 RESIDENTIAL - 35 (.25 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.50 FAR) (.60 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 50 (1.0 FAR) W POWHATAN AVE RESIDENTIAL - 83 SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 3 SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 6 (.65 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.50 FAR) GENERAL MIXED USE -24 N LINCOLN AVE N TAMPANIA AVE W RIO VISTA AVE W COMANCHE AVE W MOHAWK AVE URBAN MIXED USE - 60 COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 TRANSITIONAL USE - 24 REGIONAL MIXED USE - 100 AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL MAJOR RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE MAJOR PUBLIC/SEMI - PUBLIC (3.25 FAR) (2.0 FAR) (3.5 FAR) (2.0 FAR) MAJOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS W HILLSBOROUGH AVE W GIDDENS AVE N HABANA AVE N ARMENIA AVE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE WATER RIGHT OF WAY TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION) N SAINT VINCENT ST N MATANZAS AVE N JAMAICA ST N MACDILL AVE W FRIERSON AVE W HAYA ST W CREST AVE ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY PLAN AMENDMENT AREA N GOMEZ AVE W WILDER AVE 2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Originally Adopted - June 08, 2009. Jurisdicitonal areas updated by plan amendment. Effective to present. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT: Hillsborough County Planning and Growth Management. Effective to Present. WETLANDS: Southwest Florida Water Management District. Wetland features over 40 acres extracted from 2004 Land Use Land Cover. MAJOR ROADS: Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan. See Adopted MPO Long Range Transportation Plan for specific improvements. CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, 2006. The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. N GLEN AVE W LOUISIANA AVE W VIOLET ST 0 170 340 680 1,020 1,360 AUTHOR: C.WELSH Date: 9/22/2014 G:\gisroot\Projects\Cathy\Arcmap\NEW_MXD\TCpa\tcpa1406flu_adopted.mxd Feet W OSBORNE AVE µ

W PARIS ST W BURKE ST SCORPIO CIR PROPOSED 2025 FUTURE LAND USE PA 14-06 FROM: COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 TO: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 W IDLEWILD AVE LEGEND W CLIFTON ST W HENRY AVE RURAL ESTATE - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 3 RESIDENTIAL - 6 RESIDENTIAL - 10 (.25 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.35 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 20 (.50 FAR) W POWHATAN AVE RESIDENTIAL - 35 RESIDENTIAL - 50 RESIDENTIAL - 83 (.60 FAR) (1.0 FAR) (.65 FAR) SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 3 (.25 FAR) N LINCOLN AVE N TAMPANIA AVE W RIO VISTA AVE W COMANCHE AVE W MOHAWK AVE SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 6 GENERAL MIXED USE -24 URBAN MIXED USE - 60 COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 TRANSITIONAL USE - 24 REGIONAL MIXED USE - 100 AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (.50 FAR) (3.25 FAR) (2.0 FAR) (3.5 FAR) (2.0 FAR) MAJOR RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE W HILLSBOROUGH AVE W GIDDENS AVE N HABANA AVE N ARMENIA AVE MAJOR PUBLIC/SEMI - PUBLIC MAJOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE WATER RIGHT OF WAY TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION) N SAINT VINCENT ST N MATANZAS AVE N JAMAICA ST N MACDILL AVE W FRIERSON AVE W HAYA ST W CREST AVE ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY PLAN AMENDMENT AREA N GOMEZ AVE W WILDER AVE 2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Originally Adopted - June 08, 2009. Jurisdictional areas updated by plan amendment. Effective to present. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT: Hillsborough County Planning and Growth Management. Effective to Present. WETLANDS: Southwest Florida Water Management District. Wetland features over 40 acres extracted from 2004 Land Use Land Cover. MAJOR ROADS: Metropolitan Planning Organization 2010 Long Range Transportation Plan. See Adopted MPO Long Range Transportation Plan for specific improvements. CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, 2006. The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. N GLEN AVE W LOUISIANA AVE W OSBORNE AVE W VIOLET ST 0 170 340 680 1,020 1,360 AUTHOR: C.WELSH Date: 9/22/2014 G:\gisroot\Projects\Cathy\Arcmap\NEW_MXD\TCpa\tcpa1406flu_proposed.mxd µ Feet