Town of Onalaska. A scale map depicting the portion of Pineview Drive to be officially laid out as a Town highway is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Similar documents
The Basics of Boundary Agreements. May 29, 1997

MIDWAY CITY Municipal Code

JOINT RESOLUTION AMENDING JOINT RESOLUTION AS TO ORDERLY ANNEXATION: THE TOWN OF STILLWATER AND CITY OF STILLWATER

CITY OF PUNTA GORDA ORDINANCE NO.

WHEREAS, the City of Kenosha, Wisconsin is a Wisconsin municipality with offices at nd Street, Kenosha, Wisconsin 53140; and

PROVO CITY MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION GUIDE

ALVA ARENA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PLAN

DOWNTOWN JANESVILLE. Business Improvement District Operating Plan

Uptown Business Improvement District. Operating Plan. Approved by the City of Racine Common Council:

ORDINANCE N0.18-ll6. WHEREAS, City has prepared a Service Plan for said tract which is attached as Exhibit "A" to this ordinance; &

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENID-GARFIELD COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION

Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update, Chapter 1 Plan Summary (Cover Document)

MEETING MINUTES GRAND HAVEN CHARTER TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 18, 2016

THE VILLAGE AT LITCHFIELD PARK COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT

ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP RESOLUTION CITY OF ST. JOSEPH RESOLUTION 2018-

2015 Proposed Operating Plan Approved by the Racine Common Council on DOWNTOWN RACINE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OPERATING PLAN 2015

Report to the Plan Commission December 19, 2011

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION of HARTRIDGE HARBOR OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.

LAFCO APPLICATION NO LINDE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION TO KEYES COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Subject: Ordinance 1657, Annexation of 3.55 acres of land at 3015 and 3001 Parker Road.

Planner Ken Jaworski. Approval of Minutes: A. Approval of the minutes of the Wednesday, July 8 th, 2015 Regular Plan Commission Meeting.

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF OLYMPIA, LACEY AND YELM FOR IMPLEMENTING DESCHUTES WATER RIGHTS MITIGATION STRATEGY PHASE III

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF STORAGESHOPUSA MCFARLAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M

MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING MINNEHAHA COUNTY & DELL RAPIDS PLANNING COMMISSIONS August 28, 2017

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION Of LAKE IN THE WOODS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

AGENDA COLLETON COUNTY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, :00 P.M. COUNTY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, OLD JAIL BUILDING

TOWN OF BLOOMING GROVE AND CITY OF MADISON COOPERATIVE PLAN UNDER SECTION , WISCONSIN STATUTES APRIL 20, 2006

THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF DOUGLAS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO (PROPOSED)

NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR LAND USE REGULATION

CHAPTER 35 PARKS AND RECREATION

Water System Master Operating Agreement. for the. Marion, Howell, Oceola and Genoa. Sewer and Water Authority

RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION 84-71, Special Exception. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the governing

PUD Ordinance - Caravelle Village #7 of 1995

Operating Plan Military Avenue Business Association BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO OPERATING PLAN. Page 1 11

CITY OF ALBERT LEA PLANNING COMMISSION ADVISORY BOARD

ADOPTED BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

This unofficial copy was downloaded on Jul from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website:

PLANNING SERVICES MEMORANDUM

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

PUD Ordinance - Thornapple Manor #2 of 1998

CHAPTER NINE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS

RECITALS. 3. On January 15, 2019 the Village Plan Commission considered recommended approval of the CSM and the Agreement.

MINUTES OF THE RAPID CITY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT March 22, 2017

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS AUTHORITY AND ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES OF DEVELOPER AND PLANNING COMMISSION

ACTION FORM BRYAN CITY COUNCIL

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

From Policy to Reality

CLEARFIELD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AND SUMMARY REPORT July 31, 2018 SPECIAL POLICY SESSION

KALISPEL RESOLUTION NO $~ Kalispel Tribe of Indians P.O. Box 39 Usk, WA RESOLUTION

TOWN OF RUTLAND Ordinance No. 12.5

STATE OF ALABAMA SHELBY COUNTY

CITY OF WAUPACA CITY PLAN COMMISSION MEETING WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, :15 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL AGENDA: 1.

Meeting Date: March 14, 2018

PUD Ordinance - Caravelle #2 of 2002

(c) County board of commissioners means 1 of the following, as applicable: (ii) In all other counties, 1 of the following:

BOROUGH OF CARLISLE CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO. 2324

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENID-GARFIELD COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY OF PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 31, 2017 AGENDA REVISE ZONING MAP 2017 ANNEXATION NO. 2 MISC

Mayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services

Joint Economic Development Districts (JEDDs) Millcreek Township

MASTER INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT IMPLEMENTATION IN YAKIMA COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS

Town of Prairie du Sac Sauk County, WI. Land Division Ordinance 07-3

Oregon Statutes Relevant to Quiet Water Home Owners Association

RECITALS. WHEREAS, the GMA requires counties to adopt county-wide planning policies in cooperation with cities within the County; and

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF MANGO PARK HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

FACT SHEET. The Town Plan Commission

GLADES COUNTY, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO

Temporary Housing Ordinance Attachment. Draft 3, 11/05/10 ORDINANCE NO.

NOTICE OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Tuesday, April 4, 2017 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 6:30 PM

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M

1. Roll Call. 2. Minutes a. September 26, 2016 Regular Meeting. 3. Adoption of the Agenda. 4. Visitors to Be Heard

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED

Page # 1 of 2 Posted: March 4, 2016

CITY OF BELLEVIEW REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul Property Assessed Clean Energy Program (PACE OF MN) JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT

CHAPTER XIX ANNEXATION ARTICLE 1. ANNEXATION

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

PUD Ordinance - Cascade Lakes Plat #10 of 1995

Impact Fees. Section 1 Purpose and Intent.

ZONING & LAND REGULATION COMMITTEE Dane County Board Of Supervisors MINUTES OF THE MAY 22, 2007 PUBLIC HEARING

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

This ordinance shall be known and cited as the Antrim County Street and Road Numbering Ordinance.

SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 FINAL AGENDA SENIOR CITIZEN AND DISABLED RESIDENT TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT (NEXT SCHEDULED REPORT DECEMBER 2017)

To achieve the conservation purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth:

ORDINANCE NO (PROPOSED)

RESOLUTION NO. #

CITY OF BULLHEAD CITY,.* COUNCIL COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: May 19, 2015

CITY of EDMONTON / LEDUC COUNTY ANNEXATION. Framework for Agreement

RECITALS STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT. Draft: November 30, 2018

The City Council of the City of Sulphur, Louisiana, met in special session at its

AGENDA ITEM. Two Separate Public Hearings relating to the Eighth Avenue S./Orange Place Enclave Annexation

ANNEXATION AGREEMENTS. What is it? Shared Impact and Benefits. How long does this take to implement? Costs. The Bottom Line

Proposed Action That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached Advisory Comments and Review Record and take the following actions:

MAJOR RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING. CITY OF EVANSTON, ILLINOIS LORRAINE H. MORTON CIVIC CENTER JAMES C. LYTLE COUNCIL CHAMBERS Monday, May 15, 2017

Department Planning. Meeting Date June 14, Staff Recommendation Authorize the execution of the IGA. Previous Commission Action N/A

Transcription:

Town of Onalaska Special Meeting Minutes for March 31, 2011 The Town Board met on site of the Pineview Road and County OT in Onalaska for the purpose of viewing the lay out of the road as required by law. Supervisors present were Dave Paudler, Marc Schultz, Steve Michaels and Sandy Thompson. Four citizens were present. Josha Alisch said there are 23 kinds under the age of 10 in the Pineview neighborhood. The Board adjourned to the Town Hall, W7052 Second Street, Onalaska, for the Public Hearing for the Opening of the West End of Pineview Drive. Notice of this Public Hearing was published on February 25, March 4 and March 10, 2011. Supervisors present were Dave Paudler, Marc Schultz, Steve Michaels and Sandy Thompson. Supervisor Frank Fogel was absent. Citizens signed in. The Clerk read the notice. The Chairman asked for comments for and against the road opening, and no one come forward to make any comments. At the close of the public Hearing on the Opening of the West End of Pineview Drive, the Town Board acted on the Resolution introduced February 22, 2011 Town Board Meeting. Supervisor Thompson made a motion to adopt Supervisor Michaels seconded the motion. Motion passed 4 to 0. AMENDED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND MEETING OF SUPERVISORS TO ACT UPON HIGHWAY RESOLUTION OFFICIALLY OPENING THE WEST END OF PINEVIEW DRIVE A resolution having been introduced by the Town Board of the Town of Onalaska, La Crosse County, Wisconsin, to consider officially laying out the west end of Pineview Drive to be dedicated as a highway, and legally described as follows: Part of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 19, T17N, R7W, Town of Onalaska, LaCrosse County, Wisconsin, described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter corner of Section 19, T17N, R7W; thence S 01º 35' 13" W, 1618.81 feet along the West line of the NE 1/4 of said Section 19; thence N 89º 35' 40" E, 24.42 feet to a point on the East right-of-way line of County Road "OT" also being a point on the South line of the parcel described in Document Number 1508489 of LaCrosse County, Records, and the point of beginning of this description; thence N 89º 35 40 E, 362.17 feet along the South line of the parcel described in Document Number 1508489, to the Southeast corner thereof, also being the Southwest corner of Lot 4 of the recorded Subdivision Plat of Lake Forest Addition, and the Northwest corner of the recorded Subdivision Plat of Pines Addition; thence S 01º 12' 41" W, 60.01 feet along the West line of Pines Addition, to the Northeast corner of the parcel of land described in Document Number 1488207 of LaCrosse County Records; thence S 89º 57' 16" W, 362.37 feet along the North line of the parcel described in Document Number 1488207, to the East right-of-way line of County Road "OT"; thence N 01º 28' 04" E, 57.74 feet along said East right-of-way line, to the point of beginning of this description. Containing 21,320 square feet or 0.489 acres. Tax Parcel No. 10-410-1. A scale map depicting the portion of Pineview Drive to be officially laid out as a Town highway is attached hereto as Exhibit A. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Onalaska will meet on March 31, 2011, at 7:00 o clock p.m., at the Town Hall located at W7052 Second Street, Onalaska, Wisconsin, and decide upon the resolution relating to Pineview Drive.

Supervisor Michaels made a motion to adopt the Memorandum of Understanding addressing annexation and boundary issues between the City of Onalaska and the Town of Onalaska. Supervisor Thompson seconded the motion. Motion passed 4 to 0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:15 PM. 1. Parties MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE TOWN OF ONALASKA AND THE CITY OF ONALASKA This Memorandum of Understanding, hereafter MOU, is made and entered into by and between the parties of the Town of Onalaska, hereafter TOWN, whose address is W7052 Second Street, Onalaska, Wisconsin 54650, and the City of Onalaska, hereafter CITY, whose address is 415 Main Street, Onalaska, Wisconsin 54650. Each party shall hereby designate a representative to serve as a liaison to coordinate all matters related to this memorandum of understanding. For the Town of Onalaska, the representative shall be the Town Board Chairperson. For the City, the representative shall be the Land Use and Development Director. 2. Background a. Pursuant to the Wisconsin Statutes, the CITY adopted the City of Onalaska Comprehensive Plan 2025, May 10, 2005 to guide City decisions related to the nine elements required by State Statutes, which includes an Intergovernmental Cooperation Section. Page 41, Goal 1, Objective e states To continue working cooperatively and maintain excellent relations with all governmental units in and around the region by creating intergovernmental agreements with the City of La Crosse, Village of Holmen, Towns of Onalaska, Medary and Hamilton, and the Village of West Salem. The CITY currently exercises extraterritorial plat jurisdiction within 3 miles of the City of Onalaska corporate limits pursuant State Statutes. b. Pursuant to the Wisconsin Statutes, the TOWN adopted The Town of Onalaska Comprehensive Plan, May 26, 2005 to guide TOWN decisions related to the nine elements required by State Statutes, which includes an Intergovernmental Cooperation Section. Page 78 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation section states the objective, Draft and adopt intergovernmental and/or boundary agreements with appropriate neighboring communities and La Crosse County. Page 81 of the Action Plan states, Create Intergovernmental Agreements with the City of Onalaska. c. The TOWN and the CITY currently cooperate in the following ways: i. Metropolitan Planning Organization membership-la Crosse Area Planning Committee ii. Fire Protection and First Responder Services agreement iii. Plan Commission Agenda Mailings iv. Jurisdictional Adjacency Development Coordination v. Intergovernmental Steering Committee-Joint Planning for Brice Prairie vi. Technical Staff support for development review agreement 3. Objectives and Scope This MOU is a written understanding of the intergovernmental relationship between the CITY and TOWN and is intended as the basis for future intergovernmental agreements under the authority of Wisconsin Statute Section 66.0301 (6). This MOU is intended to clarify the mutual understanding of the CITY and TOWN about the content and structure of such subsequent agreements. This MOU documents the expectations, responsibilities and commitments or the TOWN and CITY regarding: a. Working together to develop an urban and rural land use and development policy, regulations, pattern and character in the areas of geographic adjacency and/or interest to plan for orderly growth and achieve mutually beneficial development outcomes that meet respective land use, economic development, land preservation, environmental and social objectives. b. Establishing a cooperative basis for all relations between the CITY and TOWN by

i. Establishing a policy of strong communication practices between the CITY and TOWN both formally and informally ii. Mutual respect for elected officials and staff of each jurisdiction iii. Consistent and equitable treatment of all issues raised between the TOWN and CITY iv. Continued improvement to relations and current cooperation efforts between the CITY and TOWN c. Agreeing, subject to the fiscal and operational resources to: i. Participate in regular intergovernmental steering committee meetings to discuss the maintenance, improvement or expansion of intergovernmental initiatives. ii. Identify joint planning areas no later than July 31, 2011. iii. Establish zoning for joint planning areas and a joint plan commission for the purposes of reviewing all rezoning, subdivision, conditional use and site plans for identified joint planning areas by December 31, 2011 pending a feasibility study to be prepared by the Town of Onalaska. iv. Prepare and negotiate a cooperative boundary which identifies alternatives for transfer of territory from the TOWN to the CITY and respective geographic areas of interest and review and amend when necessary as determined by the respective Plan Commissions and elected bodies. v. Explore new shared service opportunities between the TOWN and CITY. vi. Develop a public participation strategy for intergovernmental projects. vii. Develop a corridor plan for the Great River Road. viii. Continue to involve and inform affected school districts or intergovernmental initiatives. ix. Continue to work with other adjacent municipalities and La Crosse County on land development policies. x. Develop preferred neighborhood design solutions for developing areas in jurisdictional border areas. xi. Coordinate local zoning and subdivision ordinances. xii. Work together on land preservation strategies for regional greenway, park or bluff-land protection planning. d. Agreeing to tax revenue sharing in the form of continuation of the current ACT 317 provision of the City of Onalaska s code of ordinances for the geographic areas of interest areas specified herein. It is the intent of this provision to retain ACT 317 annexation fees as a result of this agreement for this geographic areas of interest in order to assist the Town with fiscal adjustments that may result from annexations and loss of territory. 4. Geographic Areas of Interest The geographic areas of interest referred to in this MOU shall be the areas shown in Exhibit A including: a. The area known as Brice Prairie from the southern boundary at CTH OT to the Town of Holland jurisdictional limits to the north, to Lake Onalaska to the west to CTH XX to the east. b. The area known as Sand Lake Coulee from the western limits at CTH SN to the eastern limits at the Town of Hamilton jurisdictional limits to the northern and southern extent of the top of slope of the bluffs surrounding Sand Lake Coulee. c. The area between Mason Street in the CITY and CTH OT in the TOWN containing existing development including Heritage Hills Addition, Strawberry Commons, Industrial Park south of CTH OT and vacant lands. d. The northern extent of Green Coulee from the former Charles Pierce property to the north to the top of slope of the bluffs of Greens Coulee. 5. Alternatives for Transfer of Territory from the TOWN to the CITY The Town and the City agree that prior to entry into a Cooperative Boundary Agreement, annexations for the following geographic areas of interest shall be addressed in the following manner. This section is further rendered null and void upon execution of a Cooperative Boundary Agreement between the Town and City. a. Sand Lake Coulee-Exhibit A i. Tier One: Areas adjacent to the City of Onalaska municipal limits may be annexed by unanimous petition by property owners. ii Tier Two: Areas removed by Tier One from the Onalaska municipal limits may be annexed by unanimous petition by property owners only after a greater contiguous portion of Tier One abutting areas have annexed. It is the intent of this agreement to discourage balloon on a string type annexations where a larger section of land is annexed by a narrow section of land. b. OT Area-Exhibit B i. Tier One: The Holley parcels may be annexed to the City of Onalaska by petition of the owner

ii. Tier Two: Areas north and west of the Holley land may only be annexed by unanimous petition of the property owner. c. iii. Tier Three: Commercial areas bordering CTH OT and STH 35 shall only be annexed by joint agreement of the Town and City. Greens Coulee. Greens Coulee parcels in the Town of Onalaska may be annexed to the City by petition of the owner to the City of Onalaska. d. Brice Prairie. Brice Prairie may be considered for annexation by mutual agreement by the Town and City in cases where conditions create an urgent need for municipal services. Such conditions may include but are not limited to water contamination or sanitary sewer needs. e. Municipal Services shall be provided to areas annexing to the City as budget and policy determinations are made by the City allowing for such services. The City shall inform the Town when annexation petitions are made to the City and if they involve municipal services extensions. f. All boundary changes shall occur as the Common Council acts on each annexation petition or petitions, subject to the terms of this agreement. g. Areas included in the City of Onalaska Comprehensive Plan urban growth area not explicitly listed in this agreement may be annexed to the City of Onalaska by petition of the property owner. 6. Responsibilities of the CITY a. Subject to the availability of fiscal and operation resources the City agrees to: i. Contact the Town at the time of application for any development within the geographic areas of interest to discuss intergovernmental issues. ii. Transmit to the TOWN Plan Commission agendas from the CITY iii. Convene the Intergovernmental Steering Committee at a rate of at least two times per year to discuss planning and development issues in the geographic areas of interest. iv. Work with TOWN officials and other local governments to sponsor joint plan commissioner training and information sessions. v. Work with TOWN officials to establish written procedures for joint planning efforts including public participation strategies. vi. Support the mutually agreeable use of third party facilitation to mediate differences between the CITY and TOWN in all areas of intergovernmental relations. vii. Maintain existing shared services and explore new opportunities for joint services viii. Work with the TOWN to negotiate, enter into, and execute intergovernmental agreements under the authority provided by Wisconsin Statute section 66.0307 or 66.0301 (6). ix. Recognize that the terms of an intergovernmental agreement under Wis. Stat. 66.0307 or 66.0301 (6) shall be binding under the terms of the agreement. 7. Responsibilities of the TOWN a. Subject to the availability of fiscal and operational resources the TOWN agrees to: i. Contact the CITY at the time of application for any development within the geographic areas of interest to discuss intergovernmental issues. ii. Transmit to the CITY Plan Commission agendas from the TOWN iii. Convene the Intergovernmental Steering Committee at a rate of at least two times per year to discuss planning and development issues in the geographic areas of interest. iv. Work with CITY officials and other local governments to sponsor joint plan commissioner training and information sessions. v. Work with CITY officials to establish written procedures for joint planning efforts including public participation strategies. vi. Support the mutually agreeable use of third party facilitation to mediate differences between the CITY and TOWN in all areas of intergovernmental relations. vii. Maintain existing shared services and explore new opportunities for joint services viii. Work with the CITY to negotiate, enter into, and execute intergovernmental agreements under the authority provided by Wisconsin Statute section 66.0307 or 66.0301 (6). ix. Recognize that the terms of an intergovernmental agreement under Wis. Stat. 66.0307 or 66.0301 (6) shall be binding under the terms of the agreement. x. Not oppose any annexations by the City that are consistent with this MOU. 8. Duration and Amendments of the MOU a. The term of this MOU shall be effective upon signature of the parties and shall remain in effect until January 1, 2021 unless terminated. This MOU may be terminated without cause and after a public

9. Severability hearing by the either governing body and 90 days written notice, which notice shall be delivered by hand or certified mail to the TOWN or CITY clerk. This MOU may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of the TOWN and CITY. a. Any provision of this MOU determined to be invalid as a matter of law is severable from other provisions of the agreement. 10. Supporting Documents a. The Town of Onalaska Comprehensive Plan b. The City of Onalaska Comprehensive Plan c. The Town of Onalaska Groundwater Study d. The Town of Onalaska Brice Prairie Master Plan e. The City of Onalaska Central Greenway Plan f. The City of Onalaska Official Map 11. Annexation Procedures for Petitions Submitted in Advance of the Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town and City The City of Onalaska and Town of Onalaska hereby agree to process annexation requests in conformance with the provisions contained herein until which time as the Intergovernmental Agreement between the two jurisdictions is executed. APPENDIX Note: This appendix provides the matrix which was used to evaluate the geographic areas of interest in order to assess various transfer of territory options by the Town and City Intergovernmental Steering Committee. It is only for reference purposes. Geographic Areas of Interest Evaluation Matrix Scenario 1-Annexation by Petition Brice Prairie Sand Lake Coulee o Within pre-established boundaries only X X o Throughout Brice Prairie o Unanimous o 50% or greater elector participation X Scenario 2-Health Safety and Welfare Need o Water contamination X X X X o Fiscal hardships o Septic Failure Scenario 3-Pre-planned Annexations o Identified urban areas (i.e. town centers, industrial, tourism, etc.) X o Special housing areas (i.e. conservation/ cluster dev) o Joint Development Areas-Economic Development, Civic Areas, Etc. X Scenario 4-Service Sharing Areas o Water X o Planning and Zoning X o Other OT area Greens Coulee The above and foregoing Memorandum of Understanding was duly adopted by the Town of Onalaska at a special meeting held on March 31, 2011.

Sand Lake Coulee Area OT Area

Brices Prairie Area Greens Coulee Area