Development Opportunity: Priority Development Site

Similar documents
A SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF CHAPTER 23L. William F. Griffin, Jr. Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C.

BUSINESS INCENTIVES POLICY June 17, 2008

GREENWAY BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Summary. Draft Redevelopment Plan Summary Flowery Branch Tax Allocation District # 1:

CARRIAGE HILLS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT SUMMARY DESCRIPTION AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AS OF NOVEMBER 2015

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Hennepin County Department of. Housing, Community Works and Transit. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Guidelines

PUTNAM, CONNECTICUT BROOKLYN, CONNECTICUT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR QUINEBAUG REGIONAL TECHNOLOGY PARK DEVELOPMENT. Dated as, 2014

City of Winnipeg Housing Policy Implementation Plan

Frequently Asked Questions

Community Preservation Act Answers To Frequently Asked Questions

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 437

DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2188

CHAPTER NINE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS

WARRANT FOR THE ANNUAL TOWN MEETING TO BE HELD MAY 9, 2011

Sec Definitions. [Note: the long list of definitions related to Mobility will appear in the Handbook.]

3. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 29

Saskatchewan Municipal Financing Tools

CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

Shawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD NO (West Lake Elsinore Public Improvements)

INTRODUCTION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUMMARY

Town of Upton Milford Street (Route 140) Commercial & Industrial PDA

COLUMBIA COUNTY EVENTS CENTER PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT (FINAL)

NANTUCKET ISLANDS LAND BANK AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY Adopted by the vote of the Land Bank Commission on November 10, 2015

DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc.

Harris Ranch Community Infrastructure District No. 1. Feasibility Report Special Assessment Bonds (Assessment Area One)

Goals and Policies Concerning Use of MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982

Lincolnton, NC Code of Ordinances CHAPTER 53: WATER AND SEWER EXTENSIONS AND AVAILABILITY CHARGES

City of Edwardsville, Kansas Special Benefit District Policy

RECITALS STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT. Draft: November 30, 2018

MIDWAY CITY Municipal Code

Chapter 10: Implementation

Understanding Texas TIRZ Statute Chapter 311 Texas Tax Code

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

Ashland Technical Assistance Panel December 12, Ashland, MA

Community Development Districts (CDDs)

Main Street Parking Area Strategy. Borough of South River Middlesex County, New Jersey

CHAPTER 40R LOCAL ZONING BYLAW GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

Public Improvement District (PID) Policy

COUNTY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS

Downtown & East Town CRA Expansion Plan City of Eustis

New Home Tax Disclosure Report

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SPRING HILL MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 5, IMPACT FEE-PURPOSES AND ADMINISTRATION

A. This ordinance shall not be effective until approved by COAH pursuant to NJAC 5:

POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES October 2018

Community Occupancy Policy

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 287

Treasure Island Development Program

Gardnerville Parking District Strategy

IC Chapter 10. Leasing and Lease-Purchasing Structures

CPA FUNDS A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE

BILL H.3653: An Act Financing the Production and Preservation of Housing for Low and Moderate Income Residents

Real Estate Development and Reuse

Riverside County Transportation Commission Rail Station Joint Development Guidelines June 2005

7. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING RESOLUTION NO

CAPE COD COMMISSION CHAPTER F

sliding scale using a project's Walk Score.] No.

DOWNTOWN JANESVILLE. Business Improvement District Operating Plan

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

2015 Proposed Operating Plan Approved by the Racine Common Council on DOWNTOWN RACINE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OPERATING PLAN 2015

Town of Bristol Rhode Island

City of Bellingham Redevelopment Incentive Recommendations at a Glance

Administration and Calculation of Servicing Agreement Fees and Development Levies

SMART GROWTH OVERLAY DISTRICT BYLAW (Added 10/7/13) SMART GROWTH OVERLAY DISTRICT (SGOD)

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

SPECIAL SERVICE AREA GUIDE

Neighborhood Line Extension Program

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council as follows:

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

Okaloosa County BCC. Okaloosa County BCC. MSBU / MSTU Policy. Municipal Service Benefit Units Municipal Service Taxing Units.

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK January 2018

SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA)

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 447

REVISED COMMUNITY LEVERAGING ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE MORTGAGE (ReCLAIM) Pilot Phase of Program

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RIO VISTA AND THE CITY OF RIO VISTA

IC Application of chapter Sec. 1. This chapter applies to each unit having a commission. As added by P.L (ss), SEC.18.

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

BYLAW 5781 ****************

Housing Assistance Incentives Program

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System Procedures Chapter 6 Facilities Management

PART 1 - Rules and Regulations Governing the Building Homes Rhode Island Program

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in Policy and Finance Committee Report 7, which was considered by City Council on July 19, 20, 21 and 26, 2005.

Housing Choice Initiative. Citizen Planners Training Collaborative March 17, 2018 Chris Kluchman, FAICP, Housing Choice Program Director

LILLIAN WEBB PARK DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. City of Norcross, Georgia 2034 Comprehensive Plan

AN ACT RELATING TO PROPERTY; LIMITING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN PUBLIC

DISCUSSION DRAFT 1 INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS

The CED 2009 Annual Report

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: MAY 10, 2018

AMENDED ZONING BY-LAW ARTICLE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 372. IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS IN MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES SUBCHAPTER A. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN

SERVICE PLAN FOR RIVER VALLEY VILLAGE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT[S] CITY OF THORNTON, COLORADO. Prepared [NAME OF PERSON OR ENTITY] [ADDRESS] [ADDRESS]

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING MAY 18, 2017 GROVELAND TOWN HALL GROVELAND, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00PM FOR THE PROPOSED

Street Improvement Plan Residential/Local Reconstruction Funding Options Part 2 Council Presentation July 21, 2015

ESCAMBIA COUNTY MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFITS UNITS GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Transcription:

Development Opportunity: Priority Development Site NORTHBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS Super Wal Mart National Grid Distribution Facility Route 146 Subject property: Assessor Map 1 Parcels 113, 114, 115, (117), 185 & 199 Zoning District: Business Business 3 (B3) Overlay District(s): Route 146 Overlay; 43D Expedited Permitting District; Aquifer Protection District Located on Main Street & Route 146 This Priority Development Site is adjacent to a SUPER WAL MART FACILITY (190,000 SF) and the NATIONAL GRID DISTRIBUTION SITE (103,000 SF). This is a designated Priority Development Site and as such has a 180 day local permitting period per MGL Chapter 43D. The site has also been designated a Regional Priority Development Area in the 2012 Blackstone Valley Prioritization Project. For more information, contact: R. Gary Bechtholdt, Town Planner: (508) 234 2447 gbechtholdt@northbridgemass.org Northbridge population: 15,707 Worcester County population: 798,552 Location...Location...Location Driving Distance: to Worcester 13 miles to Providence 30 miles to Boston 52 miles

Development Opportunity: Priority Development Site NORTHBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS The site includes five parcels totaling 4.3 acres. Permitted Uses Allowed uses include retail, business, of fice commercial and light industry. Available Infrastructure Adjacent access to Route 146; municipal water; sewer service available via an ex tension of sanitary sewer service in Sut ton. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ONLY For more information, contact: R. Gary Bechtholdt, Town Planner: (508) 234 2447 gbechtholdt@northbridgemass.org Development Potential The site may yield up to two 50,000 +/ SF buildings and associated site require ments such as parking and landscaping. Over 8,000 daily vehicle trips on Main Street; nearly 24,000 daily vehicle trips on Route 146.

Options for Funding Infrastructure at the Local Level MassWorks Local Infrastructure Development Program 1. MassWorks The MassWorks Infrastructure Program provides a one-stop shop for municipalities and other eligible public entities seeking public infrastructure funding to support: Housing development at density of at least 4 units to the acre (both market and affordable units) Transportation improvements to enhancing safety in small, rural communities Economic development and job creation and retention The MassWorks Infrastructure Program provides grant funding for the construction, reconstruction and expansion of publicly owned infrastructure including, but not limited to sewers, utility extensions, streets, roads, curb-cuts, parking facilities, water treatment systems, and pedestrian and bicycle access. Eligible public infrastructure must be located on public land or on public leasehold, right-of-way, or easement. The project must be procured in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws c.30b, c.30 39M, c.149, and c.7. The MassWorks Infrastructure Program is administered by the Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development, in cooperation with the Department of Transportation and Executive Office for Administration and Finance. In 2012, six spending goals for the MassWorks Infrastructure Program were issued, including: 80% or more of the total funding be in support of developments that are re-using previously developed sites; 25% or more of the total funding be in support of projects of regional significance that are supported by two or more communities. This PDA in Northbridge fulfills these two spending goals for funding for the extension of sewer infrastructure. The Administration s goal is to award funding to projects that are ready proceed. Therefore, it is important to note that projects must demonstrate the following in order to meet the minimum threshold for funding consideration: A timeline and funding source for completing design in a timeframe that allows for construction in the upcoming construction season; and Project design that is consistent with MassDOT s Complete Street design guidelines, which call for accommodation of all roadway users in a manner that is appropriate to the type of roadway and location; and

A complete list of required state and local permits; and Demonstration that all required permits can be reasonably obtained within 120 days of receipt of grant approval or shortly thereafter; and All rights of way are secured or evidence that the rights of way will be secured within 120 days of receipt of approval or immediately thereafter; and All sources and uses that will fully fund the project, and a complete draw schedule that reflects a construction start during the upcoming construction season. Sources and uses must be fully committed. Given the existing 2010 Northbridge/Sutton Sewer Extension Feasibility Study, prepared by Graves Engineering, Inc., the Town may be able to apply for design/engineering costs along with the construction funds. However, no more than 10% of the total grant request may be used for design/engineering. Also, if a project is seeking design/engineering funds as part of an application, the project must be able to complete design/engineering in a period that allows the project to advance to construction during the upcoming construction season. Based on the Findings and Cost Estimates of the 2010 Feasibility Study, the project should be able to meet the funding limitation for design/engineering costs. CMRPC has the capacity to assist the Town with a MassWorks grant application for this project throughout the grant application process; we have assisted several communities with this rather complex application. The cost for this work is negotiated on a case by case basis. 2. Local Infrastructure Development Program What is the local infrastructure development program? On August 7, 2012 Governor Patrick signed into law the Local Infrastructure Development Program. The enabling law, Chapter 23L, empowers municipalities and developers to finance infrastructure investment necessary to support economic development. By leveraging revenue from private sources, the program funds infrastructure projects for homeowners and commercial properties drawing upon local or state credit to finance the project. The Massachusetts Development Finance Agency (MassDevelopment) is authorized to issue bonds secured by infrastructure assessments. Why create a local infrastructure development zone? Difficult economic times have created a host of problems for cities and towns across the Commonwealth. Escalating infrastructure costs and declining municipal budgets simply do not enable community leaders, planners and developers to address the needs of new development prospects. Because of these fiscal challenges, many communities are limited in their ability to pursue dreams of a renewed downtown, business park, or commercial enterprise that attracts businesses, residents and visitors.

With the new Local Infrastructure Development Program, all cities and towns across the Commonwealth are empowered to finance infrastructure projects that address local infrastructure needs by leveraging private investment. Depending on the improvement plan, an infrastructure assessment may be levied on real estate within the development zone. The municipality can defray the cost of the improvement plan by partnering with property owners and business tenants to apply the collected assessment fees to revitalize downtowns and commercial corridors. What are the benefits of creating a local infrastructure development zone? The Local Infrastructure Development Program enables developers in partnership with municipalities to set forth a proposal for a development zone and an improvement plan that outlines the revitalization strategy that includes, but is not limited to, the boundaries of the development zone, the services and programs provided, cost estimates for financing the improvements, the method and structure of the infrastructure assessments, and a statement that the municipality will not pay for the infrastructure assessments. The developer completes the improvement plan and application for designation of a development zone. How is a local infrastructure development program formed? The developer or municipality may designate a single parcel or several parcels for redevelopment. The proposed development zone is not required to be a contiguous area, and the infrastructure development project may serve to improve any new or existing commercial, retail, industrial, residential, or mixed-use project. Through a local petition and approval process, a municipality is empowered to implement a local infrastructure development zone and an improvement plan if 100 percent of the property owners within the proposed development zone provide written consent to participate. Because the program requires 100 percent participation and the basis of the program being an agreed upon assessment of property, it is most likely that a Local Infrastructure Development Zone will be initiated by a single developer working in partnership with a municipality. The establishment of a development zone shall be initiated by the filling of a petition signed by all individuals owning real estate within the proposed development zone. The petition must include: 1. A legal description of the boundaries of the proposed development zone; 2. The written consent to establish the development zone; 3. The name of the proposed development zone; 4. A map of the proposed development zone; 5. The estimated timetable for construction of the improvements; 6. Estimates of any other private or public funding sources; 7. The improvement plan for the proposed development zone; and 8. The procedure by which the municipality will be reimbursed for any costs incurred by establishing the development zone.

How is a local infrastructure development program managed? The "public facilities owner" is defined as the municipality, the Commonwealth, or any other political subdivision, agency, or public authority of the Commonwealth identified in the improvement plan as an owner of the improvements outlined in the improvement plan. The public facilities owner will have the powers and rights necessary to implement the development zone and improvement plan. How is a local infrastructure development program financed? In accordance with the improvement plan, the assessing party, as determined by the municipality, may fix, collect, revise, and abate infrastructure assessments to defray the cost of maintenance, operating, and administrating the improvement plan. An infrastructure assessment is imposed on the real estate, lease holdings or other interests located in the development zone. All real estate within the development zone owned by the Commonwealth, agency or public authority will be exempt from infrastructure or special assessments charged by the assessing party. The infrastructure assessments established by the assessing party shall be fixed and must provide revenues to pay for the administrative expenses of the assessing party and MassDevelopment; to pay the principal and interest on bonds; to create and maintain reasonable reserves; and to pay for the development project. An alternative to the infrastructure assessment, the assessing party may levy a special assessment on real estate, lease holdings, or other interests within the development zone. The assessing party may calculate the method and structure of the special assessment by fairly allocating the costs of the improvements depending on the size or value of the property or in any reasonable manner that distributes the cost fairly. It is important to note that the method and structure of the assessment fees must be outlined in the improvement plan and must be agreed by 100 percent of the property owners in the proposed development zone. The municipality will partner with MassDevelopment to issue bonds paid solely from the funds and revenues generated from the infrastructure assessments. The bonds issued must mature within 25 years from the date issued. In addition, MassDevelopment is authorized to issue bonds secured by infrastructure assessments according to the terms of Chapter 40Q, District Improvement Financing (DIF). With the approval of the municipal governing body, MassDevelopment may issue bonds in the place of municipal bonds. In order for MassDevelopment to issue bonds in the place of municipal bonds, the city or town must fulfill all the requirements under Chapter 40Q that is required of the municipality. The requirements include the establishment of an invested revenue district development program and the determination by the municipality of the percentage of the captured assessed value. The final step is the delineation of the rights and responsibilities of the municipality, MassDevelopment and the assessing party under the terms of the DIF requirements and limitations.

Infrastructure Assessment Fee Shall be fixed May not exceed 25 years Special Assessment Fee May be calculated using any of the following methods: Length of frontage or square footage of the lot, parcel or dwelling unit; According to the value of the property; or In any reasonable manner that results in fairly allocating the cost, administration and operation of the improvements, according to the benefits conferred or received. Steps to implement the local infrastructure development program Step 1: The Petition Process Each property owner within a proposed development zone must agree to establish a development zone and agree to adopt the improvement plan as stated in the petition Step 2: The Public Hearing Process Within 120 days of receipt of the petition, a public hearing will be held. Within 90 days after the public hearing, the municipality wil issue recommendations which will include confirmation from the municipality's Planning Board Within 21 days after receipt of the recommendations, the municipal governing body will vote on the petition to establish the development zone and improvement plan. Step 3: The Approval Process By a majority vote, the municipal governing body shall vote to approve or not approve the petition to establish the development zone and improvement plan. Upon approval, the approved petition shall be filed with the Town Clerk, MassDevelopment, and the Secretary of the Commonwealth. The zone is then established.