Denver Inclusionary Housing Ordinance 2015 Interim Report

Similar documents
INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND REGULATIONS

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

Denver Comprehensive Housing Plan. Housing Advisory Committee Denver, CO August 3, 2017

$30.00 ZONING REGULATIONS CITY OF STAMFORD CONNECTICUT

Summary of Inclusionary Zoning Practices in Colorado Communities

Developing an Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance

Affordable Housing Q & A

CITY OF TORONTO. Response to the Provincial Inclusionary Zoning Consultation

CONTENTS. Housing an Inclusive Denver: Annual Action Plan (2018) Page 2

BY AUTHORITY A BILL For an ordinance adopting a new Article VI in Chapter 27 of the Denver Revised

CITY OF SAN MATEO BELOW MARKET RATE (INCLUSIONARY) PROGRAM

Detroit Neighborhood Housing Markets

Inclusionary Housing Policy

Chapter 4: Housing and Neighborhoods

C U R R E N T T O O L S I N A F F O R D A B L E H O U S I N G A N D T R A N S I T O R I E N T E D D E V E L O P M E N T I N D E N V E R.

Town of Yucca Valley GENERAL PLAN 1

HOUSING OVERVIEW. Housing & Economic Development Strategic Plan for Takoma Park Presented by Mullin & Lonergan Associates February 26,2018

Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Review of Recommendations. Planning and Development Department Community Development Division March 10, 2015

Comprehensive Housing Policy. City of Dallas, Texas

Eric Garcetti, Mayor Investment Department. May 21, 2018

SPARC ROUND 8 (FY 10)

Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance

DRAFT Inclusionary Housing Survey. Prepared for San Francisco s Technical Advisory Committee

I. Statement of Policy And Summary of Affordable Home Ownership Rules and Regulations

Draft for Public Review. The Market and Octavia Neighborhood Plan

ORDINANCE NO NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOZEMAN, MONTANA: Section 1

Barbara County Housing Element. Table 5.1 Proposed Draft Housing Element Goals, Policies and Programs

Housing Advisory Committee Retreat. Monday, January 9, 2017

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

State of Rhode Island. National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan. July 29, 2016

Downtown Mortgage Assistance and Mortgage Assistance


HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES

Chapter 14C - INCLUSIONARY HOUSING [42]

NEW ORLEANS INCLUSIONARY HOUSING STUDY

APPENDIX B DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR FEDERAL LOW-INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS

Subject: Housing and Cost Estimates for the 421-a Extended Affordability Benefits Program

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

AB 346 (DALY) REDEVELOPMENT: HOUSING SUCCESSOR: LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND JOINT AUTHOR ASSEMBLYMEMBER BROUGH

AFFORDABLE HOUSING SECTIONS 5.1 GENERAL GOALS

INCLUSIONARY DEVELOPMENT POLICY. December 8, 2015

City of North Las Vegas HOME Program Overview (FY18/19)

THE FOUNTAIN VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY

April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report

Land Bank Program. A Briefing to the Housing Committee. Housing/Community Services Department September 19, 2016

THE THE CITY OF CYPRESS

THE CITY OF BELLFLOWER SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY

HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE

HOUSING & RESIDENTIAL AREAS

CONTENTS. Housing an Inclusive Denver: Annual Action Plan (2019)

Key findings of the study include:

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 437

Amendments to the Dallas Development Code Creating Regulations for Mixed Income Housing Development Bonuses

PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY (2019 UNDERWRITING APPLICATION)

PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE HOUSING INIITATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP) PROGRAM LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN (LHAP) FISCAL YEARS ,

Multifamily Housing For All: The Need for Affordable Housing. Solutions for an Affordable Pittsburgh

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

Mammoth Lakes Housing, Inc. Purchasable Workforce Housing Policies and Guidelines Summary

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016

State of the Johannesburg Inner City Rental Market

Risk Mitigation Fund Policy

Housing Broward An Inclusive Housing Plan

ORDINANCE NO

I. Amount Received Pursuant to Section : This section provides a total amount of funds received pursuant to Section (b)(3)(A).

RE: Recommendations for Reforming Inclusionary Housing Policy

THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

January 1, 2013 thru March 31, 2013 Performance Report

Proposed amendments to Bill No Amendment no. 1. Delete Section 1 of the bill in its entirety.

THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY

City of Merced Page 1

The Planning & Development Department and the Legal Services Division recommends that Council:

Austin-area home prices set August record, outpace household income growth in August 2015

FOLLOW-UP TO CITY COUNCIL QUESTIONS FROM THE NOVEMBER 18, 2014, APPROVAL OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPACT FEE

Land Stewardship at TODs Does It Work?

City Commission Policy Administration and Implementation of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA LETTER

THE FOUNTAIN VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY

Contact Person Applicants are encouraged to direct questions regarding this NOFA to:

/2016-Vol 01 Affordable Housing Strategy Update - Low End Market Rental Policy Information Backgrounder

Subject: Affordable Housing Reserve Fund Policy Bylaw No. 3866, 2008

City of Philadelphia

1 #N7 AMX42TOD4BVTv1

PART 1 - Rules and Regulations Governing the Building Homes Rhode Island Program

HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTION DOCUMENT

Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report

2018 Pennsylvania Housing Affordability and Rehabilitation Enhancement Fund - Final

City of Golden Council Memorandum

MODERATE INCOME RENTAL HOUSING PILOT PROGRAM: APPLICATION PROCESS, PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AND AVAILABLE INCENTIVES

A f f o r d a b l e Ho u s i n g P o l i c y Gu i d e

GUIDELINES FOR COMPLYING WITH THE CITY OF SAN JOSE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING POLICY IN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS. July 1, 2007

July 1, 2017 thru September 30, 2017 Performance Report

City of Philadelphia

HOUSING & NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in Policy and Finance Committee Report 7, which was considered by City Council on July 19, 20, 21 and 26, 2005.

Using NSP to Preserve Affordability. March 22, 2011

INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL AUDIT REPORT OF THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR PURSUANT TO SECTION 34176

State Policy Options for Promoting Affordable Housing

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

1. An adequate provision of affordable housing is a fundamental and critical feature of any strong, livable and healthy community.

Transcription:

Denver Inclusionary Housing Ordinance 2015 Interim Report Office of Economic Development 201 W. Colfax Avenue Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.913.1999 www.denvergov.org/oed Introduction The City of Denver s (Denver) Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO) is a key element of the City s multi-pronged strategy to tackle Denver s critical need for affordable housing. In 2014, City Council crafted and approved updates to the IHO to incentivize the creation of affordable for-sale homes as Denver s overall for-sale housing stock grows and in response to the changing real estate market. Together these updates create a stronger and more nuanced structure of incentives that give the City increased flexibility to ensure that units are created in line with the City s affordable housing policy goals. The IHO program creates affordable homes in multiple ways. For developers who choose to satisfy their IHO obligation by building units on-site, the IHO program provides homeownership opportunities in mixed-income developments, supporting the City s goal of fostering diverse neighborhoods that allow residents to live where they work and play. In other cases, cash-in-lieu fees paid by developers capitalize an IHO Special Revenue Fund that the City can use to invest in affordable housing where it is needed the most. Units created as a result of the IHO program represent an important first step on the property ladder for families earning between 50% and 95% of Denver s Area Median Income (AMI). In 2015, for a family of four, an eligible family would be one earning a household income between $39,950 and $75,905. Through the IHO program, families like these have the opportunity to put down roots in their communities, opportunities that are increasingly important as median home values in Denver continue to rise out of reach for many working families. In addition to last year s legislative changes to the IHO, Denver s Office of Economic Development (OED), which administers the City s affordable housing policies, programs, and investments, has endeavored to improve IHO governance and administration. One major change will be the inclusion of the annual IHO report with OED s overall annual housing report, in the first quarter of every year. This report serves as an interim update in advance of the full annual housing report in Q1 2016. IHO Requirements at a Glance The IHO requires all newly constructed, for-sale housing development projects of 30 or more units to allocate 10% of the units as affordable. Affordable units must be of a commensurate type and size as market-rate units, unless an alternative is negotiated at the discretion of the OED director (see Alternative Satisfaction below). The income level at which units must be affordable depends on the type of structure: A high-cost structure is one that: (a) is three stories or greater; (b) includes an elevator; and (c) has more than 60% of its parking within a parking structure. For a high-cost structure, units must be affordable at 95% of Area Median Income. A standard structure is any residential structure that does not meet the definition of a high-

Office of Economic Development cost structure. For a standard structure, units must be affordable at 80% of AMI. Each year, OED publishes on its website the maximum sales price at each income level, adjusted by number of bedrooms. To be eligible to purchase an IHO unit, households must earn at least 50% of AMI. The 2015 eligible income levels and maximum sales prices are shown in Table 1 and Table 2: Table 1. MAXIMUM SALES PRICES % AMI Number of Bedrooms Studio 1 Bedroom 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4 Bedrooms 80% AMI $155,330 $169,084 $218,108 $246,886 $260,465 95% AMI $192,073 $211,045 $270,309 $303,131 $320,971 Table 2. ELIGIBLE INCOME LEVELS % AMI Household Size 1 Person 2 Persons 3 Persons 4 Persons 5 Persons 6 Persons 50% AMI $28,000 $32,000 $36,000 $39,950 $43,150 $46,350 80% AMI $44,750 $51,150 $57,550 $63,900 $69,050 $74,150 95% AMI $53,200 $60,800 $68,400 $75,905 $81,985 $88,065 Developers may negotiate with OED to satisfy their IHO obligation through alternative compliance or by contributing a cash-in-lieu fee to the IHO Special Revenue Fund. Developers who satisfy their IHO obligation by building units on-site are eligible to receive a per unit incentive, pending the availability of funds in the IHO Special Revenue Fund. Off-site and Alternative Satisfaction At the discretion of OED, developers may negotiate an alternative affordable housing plan. The option for alternative satisfaction allows developers to deviate from the IHO requirement on one particular aspect in exchange for exceeding the requirement in other aspects. Off-site alternative compliance options may include: Building more total bedrooms or more units than required at a site in the same or proximate neighborhood; Building more total bedrooms or more units than required at a site within a half mile of light rail or commuter rail; or Building more rental units at a site in the same or proximate neighborhood or within a half mile of light rail or commuter rail. On-site alternative compliance options may include: Building fewer units than required that are affordable at lower income levels than required; Building fewer units than required with more net bedrooms; Building fewer units than required for populations with special needs; Building fewer units than required with a longer deed restriction; or Building more rental units. Figure 1 demonstrates the Alternative Satisfaction Process. - 2 -

Office of Economic Development Figure 1. ALTERNATIVE SATISFACTION PROCESS Neighborhood Zones for Cash-in-Lieu Fees and Rebates A key feature of the 2014 IHO amendments was the introduction of three statistical neighborhood categories that rank neighborhoods as High, Moderate, or Low depending on the existing availability of affordable housing and proximity to transit. The amount of cash-in-lieu fees and rebates depends on the neighborhood type in which the project is located, as shown in Table 3. The current designation of each Denver neighborhood is shown in Appendix A. Table 3. FEES AND REBATES BY NEIGHBORHOOD ZONE Neighborhood Affordable Housing Zone Cash-in-lieu fee (% of affordable sales price, per unit ) Rebate for units constructed (per unit) High 70% $25,000 Medium 50% $6,500 Low 25% $2,500-3 -

Office of Economic Development Covenant Restrictions The long-term affordability of units created as a result of IHO requirements is guaranteed through a restrictive covenant. Unless otherwise negotiated as part of alternative compliance, the affordability of IHO units is restricted for fifteen years. During this time, owners of IHO units must notify OED of their intention to sell and must sell the unit at or below a maximum sales price calculated by OED. All buyers of IHO units during the income-restricted period must: (i) have their income verified, (ii) participate in an approved housing counseling program, and (iii) use the unit as their primary residence. Production IHO production is reflective of the market rate for-sale housing production in Denver; therefore, IHO unit production has been somewhat dependent on conditions affecting all for-sale housing in Denver. As shown in Figure 2, the majority of existing IHO units were constructed as part of largescale developments built from 2003-2005. As the housing market slowed in the mid-2000s, IHO production slowed along with it. Even as the housing market in Denver has strengthened significantly in the past few years, for-sale multi-family production has continued to be affected by tighter lending standards and construction defects requirements. While for-sale construction has remained slow, 2015 has seen an increase in IHO unit production. 211 Figure 2. Affordable IHO Units Produced by Year 301 306 2 13 54 100 46 46 29 24 7 0 5 22 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 IHO projects can be classified as Non-Large Scale or Large Scale. Existing Large Scale developments are projects that have a contractual agreement with the City to provide at least 200 affordable for-sale housing units as part of a master planned development and are allowed to participate in the IHO and receive incentives. Non-Large Scale developments are usually smaller projects that build 30 or more for-sale units and must comply with the IHO. As shown in Table 4, the preponderance of IHO units are located in Large Scale developments in the eastern portion of the city, with the remaining sites scattered throughout Denver. Table 4. IHO UNITS BY DEVELOPMENT TYPE Type Project AMI # of Units Non-Large Scale Various 80-95% 82 Large Scale Green Valley Ranch 80% 642-4 -

Office of Economic Development Lowry Redevelopment 80% 186 Stapleton 80-100% 256 Total 1,166 Figure 3 shows the location of all IHO units constructed to date. This map includes units that were built on-site as part of mixed-income projects only. Figure 3. IHO On-Site Units Constructed, 2001 - June 2015-5 -

Office of Economic Development IHO Special Revenue Fund The IHO Special Revenue Fund (Fund) was created by the City to support the implementation of the IHO. The Fund collects cash-in-lieu payments and is the source of funds for rebates and incentives as provided for in the IHO legislation. The Fund is administered by OED and was capitalized with $2,150,000 in City general funds between 2003 and 2005. Since then, the Fund has grown to $4,297,473 as shown below in Table 5. Table 5. IHO SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BALANCE REVENUES Cash in Lieu $7,647,921 Fees $3,926 Fund Transfers $2,150,000 Investment Income $381,362 Interest Received $138,878 Principal Received $4,741 Total Revenues $10,326,829 EXPENSES & PAYMENTS Rebates $2,749,500 Grant $312,000 Loans $2,431,757 Administrative Expenses* $536,099 Total Expenditures $6,029,356 IHO Rebates/Incentives CURRENT BALANCE $4,297,473 *Administrative costs are approximately 12.5% of fund balance and 8.9% of expenditures. Incentive rebates are paid to developers who produce affordable units in accordance with the IHO, as funds are available and depending on the location of the project. As described above, rebates vary by neighborhood based on the existing availability of affordable housing and proximity to transit. If the project is in a Low zone, the rebate is $2,500 per affordable unit provided; if the project is in a Medium zone, the rebate is $6,500 per affordable unit provided; if the build is in a High zone, the rebate is $25,000 per affordable unit provided. The City is only obligated to provide rebates if there is sufficient capital available in the fund. Table 6 shows all rebates that have been disbursed from the fund over the life of the IHO. - 6 -

Table 6. INCENTIVES AND REBATES PAID FROM THE IHO FUND Office of Economic Development DEVELOPMENT AMOUNT YEAR # Units Oakwood Homes $750,000 2003-2005 150 Forest City $793,500 2003-2014 152 Lowry Redevelopment $978,000 2005-2012 188 Jack Kerouac Lofts $30,000 2006 6 Zocalo $33,000 2006 6 Observatory $44,000 2007-2010 8 Wonderland $27,500 2007 5 Riverclay Condos $33,000 2008 6 Grant Park $60,500 2009 11 TOTAL REBATES/INCENTIVES $2,749,500 532 IHO Cash In Lieu Fees Developers of projects required to comply with the IHO may negotiate with OED to satisfy their obligation through a cash-in-lieu (CIL) payment, which varies according to the need for affordable housing at the location of the project, as described above. If the project is in a Low zone, the CIL fee is 25% of the affordable sales price for each affordable unit not provided; if the project is in a Medium zone, the CIL fee is 50% of the affordable sales price for each affordable unit not provided; if the project is in a High zone, the CIL fee is 70% of the affordable sales price for each affordable unit not provided. All cash-in-lieu fees are deposited into the fund, as shown in Table 7. Table 7. CASH IN LIEU FEES RECEIVED BY THE IHO FUND DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS AMOUNT YEAR # Units Benjamin Moore Lofts 2500 Walnut $160,000 2005 2 Museum Residences 55 W. 12th Avenue $434,471 2005 6 Manor Homes @ Platte Park Sherman Subdivision $271,380 2007 4 Zi Lofts & Town Homes 2229 Blake $309,510 2007-2008 4 Ajax Lofts 2955 Inca $62,306 2008 1 Watermark 5th & Acoma $590,773 2008 9 Spire 891 14th Street $3,008,602 2010-2013 49 Four Seasons 1111 14th Street $942,445 2011 10 Montrechez 4545 S. Monaco $531,774 2011-2013 5 One Lincoln Park 2001 Lincoln $500,000 2012-2014 18 250 Columbine 250 Columbine $836,660 2014 7 TOTAL CASH IN LIEU: $7,647,921 115 Figure 4 shows the location of projects that have satisfied their IHO obligation by paying a cash-inlieu fee. - 7 -

Figure 4. CASH IN LIEU FEES RECEIVED BY PROJECT LOCATION Office of Economic Development IHO Loans & Grants When the amount of cash-in-lieu fees received exceeds the amount of rebates paid for IHO units, the excess funds may be used by OED as a source of capital to finance the creation or preservation of additional affordable units. OED has invested approximately $2.7 million from the IHO fund, resulting in the creation of 479 affordable units, as shown in Tables 8a and 8b. Table 8a. AFFORDABLE HOUSING INVESTMENTS FROM THE IHO FUND (LOANS) Units Built by Development Amount Amount Affordability Level Year Type (Loans) Invested Leveraged 30% 50% 60% 80% AMI AMI AMI AMI 18th & Chestnut 2013 $950,000 $23,127,526 Rental 34 34 Park Hill Village $286,757 2013 $30,056,124 Rental 22 133 Park Hill Village II $275,000 Glenarm Residences 2014* $920,000 $41,533,648 Rental 11 212 Totals $2,431,757 $94,717,298 11 56 379 *This represents a 2006 initial loan that was refinanced/constructed in 2015-8 -

Table 8b. AFFORDABLE HOUSING INVESTMENTS FROM THE IHO FUND (GRANTS) Office of Economic Development Units Built by Development Amount Amount Affordability Level Year Type (Grant) Invested Leveraged 30% 50% 60% 80% 95% AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI Mercy Housing 2007 $312,000 n/a For Sale 3 30 Totals $312,000 3 30 Figure 5 shows the location of affordable projects in which OED has contributed financing from the IHO Fund. Figure 5. AFFORDABLE HOUSING INVESTMENTS FROM THE IHO FUND As shown in Figure 6, the balance of the IHO Fund has shown strong growth in 2013 and 2014, enabling OED to finance two major new affordable rental projects in 2013-2014 (18 th & Chestnut and Park Hill Village). - 9 -

Figure 6. IHO Fund Balance and Units Financed Office of Economic Development $4,638,663 $835,730 $889,748 $1,044,051 33 $536,155 $259,027 $1,267,516 $1,813,984 223 223 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 IHO Fund Balance Units Financed Expected Future IHO Units Production and Fund Growth OED is in negotiation with a number of developments that may be required to comply with the IHO, and currently expects at least 20 affordable for-sale units to be constructed. OED is currently anticipating requests for cash rebates of approximately $152,000 and the receipt of cash-in-lieu payments of approximately $950,000, meaning that the IHO fund will continue to grow into the near future. OED has also executed an agreement for the Saint Anthony s/south Sloan s Lake project, which will provide 30 affordable rental units and either four 3-bedroom or six 2-bedroom affordable for-sale units. The South Sloan s Lake project includes an additional 120 affordable units financed by the Denver Housing Authority. Looking Ahead OED continues to invest in its capacity to administer the IHO efficiently and in ways that meet the City s strategic affordable housing goals. The following actions have improved customer service for both the development community and for potential buyers of IHO homes: Hired an IHO advisor who acts a single point of contact for developers negotiating alternative IHO compliance. The IHO advisor also provides consistency across projects to ensure that IHO agreements collectively support the City s affordable housing strategy. Created affordable housing marketing materials for developers which provide a quick and easy understanding on the IHO and how to comply. Developed detailed written policies and procedures for IHO program administration, providing increased transparency and consistency. Created an online IHO application and income verification system, which will significantly improve potential homebuyers access to the IHO program. Implemented a new CRM software system that will allow OED to digitize past IHO-related files and begin keeping program data in a new digital format. The new system will provide capacity for more in-depth evaluation and analysis of IHO units and investments. OED looks forward to continuing to measure and assess the impact of the new IHO amendments on the City s affordable housing goals. - 10 -

APPENDIX A: Denver Neighborhood IHO Zones Office of Economic Development - 11 -