REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 18, 2017

Similar documents
REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 22, 2016

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 8, 2014

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 21, 2016

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 20, 2015

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE MAY 7, 2015

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FEBRUARY 5, 2015

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT JANUARY 21, 2015

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT JANUARY 8, 2015

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 3, 2015

FUTURE LAND USE. City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendments

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance

Application For Rezoning To Conventional Zoning District

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Porter. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

**REVISED Notice of Public Hearings for Proposed Land

Plans shall be drawn at a readable scale, signed, and sealed by a Florida Registered Engineer. The application package shall include:

Exhibit D. Tallow Ridge PUD. Written Description. Date: January 5, E. City Development Number:

Notice of Public Hearings for Proposed Land Use Change and Rezoning

Exhibit THIRD AMENDED PUD WRITTEN DESCRIPTION. Willens Claire Lane PUD

Residential Project Convenience Facilities

Revised Notice of Public Hearings for Proposed Land Use Change

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

PUTNAM COUNTYCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2188

EXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD

Notice of Public Hearings for Proposed Land Use Change

Notice of Public Hearings for Proposed Land Use Change and Rezoning

FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS

EXHIBIT D. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION For. TOWNSEND VILLAGE PUD December 23, 2015 (Revised)

Chapter Planned Residential Development Overlay

Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation REZONING

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Garland. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

ORDINANCE NO. 15- Regulations (LDR) which would further the codification of TOD regulations that

Cobb County Community Development Agency Zoning Division 1150 Powder Springs St. Marietta, Georgia 30064

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

ARTICLE B ZONING DISTRICTS

KNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION SUBDIVISION REPORT - CONCEPT/USE ON REVIEW

Sec Planned unit development (PUD) zoning district requirements and procedures.

TOOELE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE CHAPTER 31 Page 1

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia

WESTMINSTER PARK SUBDIVISION

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

See reverse side for additional information

APPLICANT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION. CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT Council District 4 PRESENT ZONING PROPOSED ZONING

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Lee. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

ARTICLE 2 ZONING DISTRICTS AND MAPS

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

SUBDIVISION DESIGN PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS

Notice of Public Hearings for Proposed Land Use Change

Town of Gorham Development Transfer Fee Program SECTION XVIII DEVELOPMENT TRANSFER OVERLAY DISTRICT

Tuss and Lisa Taylor. Agriculture

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

1. Roll Call. 2. Minutes a. September 24, 2018 Special Joint Meeting with Clay County Planning Commission. 3. Adoption of the Agenda

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: February 17, 2010

Draft Zoning Changes for the 2nd Planning Board Public Hearing, January 22, 2018.

STAFF REPORT FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT CDP# STANDARD PERMIT June 11, 2013 CPA-1. Victor Suarez Fern Drive Mendocino, CA 95460

Chapter Plat Design (LMC)

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 20, 2017

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION OF THE RAPID CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS

SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION LEVY COUNTY, FLORIDA

Notice of Public Hearings for Proposed Land Use Change and Rezoning

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Indicates Council-recommended changes Introduced by: Mr. Tackett Date of introduction: June 14, 2016 SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 TO ORDINANCE NO.

City Of Jacksonville, Florida Planning Commission. March 28, :00pm

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

ARTICLE VI. SUBDIVISION STANDARDS, PUBLIC

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

Section 7.22: Multifamily Assisted Housing in AA-30 Residential Zone (MAHZ) [Note: an additional line will be added to the Table in Article 3, 3.1.

ORDINANCE NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PUD/DCI BAINBRIDGE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

Proposed Overland Park Kansas Ordinance RE-1 Residential Estates Community

MIXED USE PROJECT PLAN (MUP)

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Notice of Public Hearings for Proposed Land Use Change

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Be linked by an internal circulation system (i.e., walkways, streets, etc.) to other structures within the IPUD;

Article XII. R-1 Agricultural-Low Density Residential District

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

Amendments to Chapter proposed by the Assembly Title 21 Committee

Planned Unit Development (PUD). Sections:

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M

LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZONING DIVISION STAFF REPORT. A. Applicant: Ronald Principato/ Principato Accessory Apartment

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. Jefferson County, West Virginia

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

PERMITTED USES: Within the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District the following uses are permitted:

CITY OF OCOEE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SUFFICIENCY TABLE WITH NOTES

SECTION 4 ZONING DISTRICTS

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. QUEST ASSISTED LIVING CONDITIONAL USE PLNPCM West 800 North Hearing date: October 14, 2009

For the purposes of this section, a dwelling unit shall consist of single-family, multiple family, and mobile homes.

Transcription:

BEL REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE 2016-805 TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 18, 2017 The Planning and Development Department hereby forwards to the Planning Commission, Land Use and Zoning Committee and City Council its comments and recommendation regarding Application for Rezoning Ordinance 2016-805 to Planned Unit Development. Location: 2629 Loretto Road between Flynn Road and County Dock Road Real Estate Numbers: 105635-0005, 105634-0010 Current Zoning District: Proposed Zoning District: Current Land Use Category: Rural Residential-Acre () Planned Unit Development (PUD) Low Density Residential (LDR) Planning District: Southeast, District 3 Planning Commissioner: Daniel Blanchard City Council District: The Honorable Matt Schellenberg, District 6 Applicant: Owner: Staff Recommendation: Paul M. Harden, Esq. 501 Riverside Avenue, Suite 901 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Helen Simon 2629 Loretto Road Jacksonville, Florida 32223 APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS GENERAL INFORMATION Application for Rezoning Ordinance 2016-0391 seeks to rezone 9.38 acres from Rural Residential-Acre () to Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of subdividing the property into a maximum of 21 single family lots. The site has frontage on

Page 2 County Dock Road and Loretto Road. There is some wetland area in the northeast corner of the site. JEA water, sanitary sewer and electric are available. County Dock Road is a substandard road in that the right of way is less than the minimum required 60 feet. The Development Services Division indicates that access from the road is permitted if the difference between the existing width and the required width is added to proposed subdivision. The developer/owner will be required to reserve an additional 30 feet along County Dock Road. In 2007 the City Council enacted the Mandarin Road Overlay with additional criteria for any rezoning within the overlay. The parcels are outside the Mandarin Road Overlay. The green color represents the Overlay in the map below. County Dock Road, Loretto Road and portions of Mandarin Road were designated as scenic and historic corridors pursuant to Ordinance 2001-1009-E. The Ordinance requires any tree within 20 feet of the right of way to be considered a protected tree and shall meet the provisions of the Landscape and Tree Protection Regulations of the Zoning Code. The other condition requires the paved portion of the designated streets to be maintained at their existing width. A copy of the Ordinance is attached at the end of this report. The PUD is not seeking to waive any provision of 2001-1009-E. # # Map of Mandarin Overlay

Page 3 CRITERIA FOR REVIEW Pursuant to the provisions of Section 656.125 of the Zoning Code, the Planning and Development Department, Planning Commission and City Council (including the appropriate committee) shall evaluate and consider the following criteria of an application for rezoning to Planned Unit Development. (1) Is the proposed zoning district consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan? Yes. The Planning and Development Department finds that the subject property is located in the Low Density Residential (LDR) functional land use category as defined by the Future Land Use Map series (FLUMs) contained within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) adopted as part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The LDR functional land use category permits housing developments in a gross density range of up to seven (7) dwelling units per acre when full urban services are available to the site. The proposed PUD proposes a gross density of 2.2 dwelling units to the acre and will have full urban services available to the site. Therefore, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the FLUMs adopted as part of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 650 Comprehensive planning for future development of the Ordinance Code. A description of the category is noted below. Principal Uses: Single family and Multi-family dwellings. Secondary Uses: Secondary uses shall be permitted pursuant to the Residential land use introduction. In addition the following secondary uses may also be permitted: Borrow pits; Animals other than household pets; Foster care homes; Drive through facilities in conjunction with a permitted use; Assisted living facilities and housing for the elderly, so long as said facilities are located within three miles of a hospital and on an arterial roadway; and Commercial retail sales and service establishments when the site is located at the intersection of roads classified as collector or higher on the Functional Highway Classification Map, however logical extensions and expansions of preexisting commercial retail sales and service establishments are exempt from the roadway classification and intersection requirements. New LDR subdivisions should meet a standard of connectivity as defined in this element and cul-desacs should be avoided. (2) Does the proposed rezoning further the goals, objectives and policies of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan? The evaluation of the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan can be found later in this report. (3) Does the proposed rezoning conflict with any portion of the City s land use regulations? The written description and the site plan of the intended plan of development, meets all portions of the City s land use regulations and furthers their intent by providing specific development standards.

Page 4 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 656.341(d) of the Zoning Code, the Planning and Development Department, Planning Commission and City Council (including the appropriate committee) shall evaluate and consider the following criteria for rezoning to Planned Unit Development district: (1) Consistency with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan In accordance with Section 656.129 Advisory recommendation on amendment of Zoning Code or rezoning of land of the Zoning Code, the subject property is within the following functional land use category as identified in the Future Land Use Map series (FLUMs): Low Density Residential (LDR). This proposed rezoning to Planned Unit Development is consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, and furthers the following goals, objectives and policies contained herein, including: FLUE Goal 1: To ensure that the character and location of land uses optimize the combined potentials for economic benefit and enjoyment and protection of natural resources, while minimizing the threat to health, safety and welfare posed by hazards, nuisances, incompatible land uses and environmental degradation. FLUE Policy 1.1.22: Future development orders, development permits and plan amendments shall maintain compact and compatible land use patterns, maintain an increasingly efficient urban service delivery system and discourage urban sprawl as described in the Development Areas and the Plan Category Descriptions of the Operative Provisions. FLUE Objective 3.1: Continue to maintain adequate land designated for residential uses which can accommodate the projected population and provide safe, decent, sanitary and affordable housing opportunities for the citizens. Protect single-family residential neighborhoods by requiring that any other land uses within single-family areas meet all applicable requirements described in the Development Areas and the Plan Category Descriptions of the Operative Provisions of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations. FLUE Policy 3.1.6: The City shall provide for development of a wide variety of housing types by area, consistent with the housing needs characteristics and socioeconomic profiles of the City's households as described in the Housing Element. Additionally, the application may be consistent with the listed Goals, Policies and Objectives of the Conservation Coastal Management Element (CCME) and the Sanitary Sewer Sub- Element, if certain steps are taken at the time of development to ensure specific conditions are met. The proposed development is located contiguous to developed property with the same zoning district (to the east and north). This will ensure a similar type of land use pattern and distribution of growth in this area of the City, while providing for a variety of housing types

Page 5 (2) Consistency with the Concurrency Mobility and Management System Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 655 Concurrency and Mobility Management System of the Ordinance Code, the development will be required to comply with all appropriate requirements of the Concurrency and Mobility Management System (CMMSO) prior to development approvals. (3) Allocation of residential land use This proposed Planned Unit Development intends to utilize lands for a single family development not to exceed 21 lots. This proposed development will not exceed the projected holding capacity reflected in Table L-20, Land Use Acreage Allocation Analysis For 2030 Comprehensive Plan s Future Land Use Element, contained within the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. (4) Internal compatibility This proposed PUD is consistent with the internal compatibility factors with specific reference to the following: The streetscape: Due to the site plan and development standards, it is expected the proposed subdivision will have a similar streetscape of surrounding subdivisions. The treatment of pedestrian ways: The proposed development will have internal sidewalks. There are no sidewalks on Loretto Road or County Dock Road. Development Services Division has indicated that sidewalks would not be allowed on County Dock Road due to the substandard road width. Traffic and pedestrian circulation patterns: The proposed site shows access from Loretto Road and County Dock Road. The Development Services Division has indicated that County Dock Road is a substandard road in that the right of way is less than the minimum required 60 feet. Access from the road is permitted if the difference between the existing width and the required width is added to proposed subdivision. The developer/owner will be required to provide an additional 30 feet along County Dock Road. The use and variety of building setback lines, separations, and buffering: Applicant proposes standard RLD-90 setbacks for all proposed single-family lots. (5) External Compatibility Based on the written description of the intended plan of development and site plan, the Planning and Development Department finds that external compatibility is achieved by the following:

Page 6 The type, number and location of surrounding external uses: The property is a single parcel of land, located adjacent to two large lots to the north and south, both developed as single family. The property to the east and west is also developed as single family homes, but at a smaller lot size, consistent with the RLD-90 or below lot requirements for size, dimensions and setbacks. The Comprehensive Plan and existing zoning on surrounding lands: The adjacent uses, zoning and land use categories are as follows: Adjacent Land Use Zoning Current Use Property Category District North RR Single family dwellings LDR RLD-90 Single family dwellings South LDR Single family dwellings East LDR RLD-90 Single family dwellings West LDR Single family dwellings (6) Intensity of Development The proposed development is consistent with the LDR functional land use category and is a single family development, which is not to exceed 21 lots. The PUD is appropriate at this location because it will offer alternative housing options in the area. The existing residential density and intensity of use of surrounding lands: The density and intensity of the surrounding residential uses is similar to the proposed subdivision. The area directly to the east, Ramsgate subdivision is zoned RLD-90, as is the short cul-de-sac to the north. Immediately surrounding the subject property is zoned, although there are seven lots which do not meet the minimum 1 acre lot size. The overall area is zoned for 1 acre to 1/4 acre lot sizes. The availability and location of utility services and public facilities and services: JEA has indicated that water and sewer are available. The access to and suitability of transportation arteries within the proposed PUD and existing external transportation system arteries: The site plan shows the main point of ingress/egress on County Dock Road. The City s Traffic Engineer has indicated that changing County Dock Road to one-way will allow the roadway to accommodate additional traffic. A second access point is via a 30 foot wide drive to Loretto Road.

Page 7 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREA STUDENTS GENERATED SCHOOL CAPACITY (Permanent/Portables) CURRENT ENROLLMENT 20 Day Count (2016/17) Crown Point ES #245 5 4 1,104 908 82% 102% Mandarin MS #259 5 2 1,615 1,534 95% 90% Mandarin HS #260 5 2 2,504 2,523 101% 90% % OCCUPIED 4 YEAR PROJECTION (7) Usable open spaces plazas, recreation areas. The proposed project is less than 25 lots and therefore is not required to provide a recreation area or open space. (8) Impact on wetlands Review of a 2004 Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System map provided by the St. Johns River Water Management District did identify a small area of wetlands on-site. Any development impacting wetlands will be permitted pursuant to local, state and federal permitting requirements. (9) Listed species regulations No wildlife survey was required as the project is less than the 50-acre threshold. (10) Off-street parking including loading and unloading areas. The site will be developed in accordance with Part 6 of the Zoning Code. (11) Sidewalks, trails, and bikeways The proposed development will have internal sidewalks that will meet the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. There are no sidewalks on Loretto Road or County Dock Road. Development Services Division has indicated that sidewalks would not be allowed on County Dock Road due to the substandard road width.

Page 8 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Upon visual inspection of the subject property on April 6, 2017, the required Notice of Public Hearing sign was posted. RECOMMENDATION Based on the foregoing, it is the recommendation of the Planning and Development Department that Application for Rezoning 2016-805 be APPROVED with the following exhibits: 1. The original legal description dated March 1, 2017. 2. The original written description dated February 27, 2017. 3. The original site plan dated February 14, 2017. Based on the foregoing, it is the recommendation of the Planning and Development Department that the application for Rezoning 2016-805 be APPROVED subject to the following conditions, which may only be changed through a rezoning: 1. The 30 foot wide access to Loretto Road shall be eliminated. 2. A Phase I Environmental Impact Study shall be prepared by the owner, applicant or developer and submitted to the Planning and Development Department at the time of Verification of Substantial Compliance. 3. A traffic study subject to the review and approval of the Transportation Planning Division shall be conducted by a professional traffic engineer. A methodology meeting shall be held with the City Traffic Engineer prior to the commencement of the study.

Page 9 4. Prior to requesting a final building inspection or occupying the facility in any manner, the owner, applicant or devleoper shall submit to the Planning Department separate certification letters confirming that all horizontal and vertical components of the development have been substantially completed, and all conditions to the development order have been satisfied. This condition shall apply to both phased and non-phased developments. Aerial view of subject property

Page 10 Current driveway entrance on Loretto Road View along Loretto Road

Page 11 Subdivision entrance proposed on County Dock Road Subdivision entrance proposed on County Dock Road

Page 12 Proposed entrance along County Dock Road Proposed entrance along County Dock Road

Page 13 RLD-120 MANDARIN ROAD RLD100A COUNTY DOCK ROAD RLD-90 DRAKEWOOD COURT RLD-90 RLD-90 SCOTT MILL ROAD PUD YALDING DRIVE PUD MONTEZ LANE LORETTO ROAD RLD100A PUD PUD PUD FLYNN ROAD RLD-90 RLD-90 REQUEST: N FROM: TO: PUD # W E S COUNCIL DISTRICT: 06 ORDINANCE NUMBER: ORD-2017-0805 TRACKING NUMBER: T-2016-1206 Page 1 of 1