SUBJECT: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AT 2100 W. SAN MARCOS BOULEVARD

Similar documents
CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Proposed London Plan Amendment 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643, and 1649 Richmond Street London, ON

DISTRICT I: TWIN HOMES. District I Locations. Final Plat Lot Numbers: 119, 120, 158

.273 ACRES OF MIXED USE (MU-40) LAND

The State of North Broad

PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

.48 ACRES INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL LAND

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Implementing Pre-Application Neighborhood Meetings in Prince George s County A Discussion Paper

Planning and Zoning Commission STAFF REPORT

1.05 ACRES ZONED 15 DU/ACRE WITH EXISTING HOUSE

Rapid City Planning Commission Rezoning Project Report

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning

November 22, AGENCY/Zoning Division 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 2 nd Floor Oakland, California

UDO Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 18, 2011

City Council Agenda Item #14_ Meeting of Oct. 8, Concept plan for Marsh Run Two Redevelopment at and Wayzata Blvd.

For Sale Price: $9,999, W. Elk Ave. Glendale, CA 91204

Staff Report. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA): The proposal requires review under the State Environmental Policy Act.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION STAFF RECOMMENDATION IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS

PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, August 30, 2017

City of Brea PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION

South Park County Sanitation District

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

BUREAU OF PLANNING/ZONING DIVISION 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 2nd Floor Oakland, California 94612

Item # 9 September 13, 2006

Accessory Dwelling Units

Canwood Agoura Hills Canwood Street. Agoura Hills, CA 91301

The Board and its professionals take no exception to the requested deck/porch addition.

Disclaimer for Review of Plans

85-93 WILLOW COURT RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

Riverside 25 Jurupa Road City of Jurupa Valley, CA 92509

Ordinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT SAVOY DRIVE AREA ZONING MAP AMENDMENT II

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING THE COURTYARD RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 10 CONDOMINIUMS AND A NEW SPECIFIC PLAN

25282 Baseline Street, San Bernardino

Campbell County Planning Commission Minutes April 26, 2010

INDIANA AV NORFOLK SOUTHERN R/R

M E M O. September 14, 2017 Agenda Item #4. Planning Commission. David Goodison, Planning Director

VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE PLAN COMMISSION VILLAGE HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 801 BURLINGTON AVENUE. June 2, :00 p.m. AGENDA

VACANT COMMERCIAL LOT ON 2.47 GROSS ACRES

Item 10C 1 of 69

Town of Clinton, Connecticut Action Plan for the Historic Unilever Property and Area. Steering Committee Meeting #5 Implementation Strategies

Staff Report & Recommendation Rezoning Case RZ Date of Report: June 6, 2014 Report by: Doug Stacks

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Site # 1 (Intracoastal Waterway)

City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department STAFF REPORT

MANZANO WAY SUNNYVALE CALIFORNIA. Prime Infill Location Residential Zoning (R-0) 3 Single-Family Detached Lots OFFERING MEMORANDUM

4.3 ACRE HORSE RANCH WITH HOUSE 480 VALE VIEW DRIVE - VISTA, CA

RAE EXCLUSIVE RESIDENTIAL ZONE A residential district exclusively for low density single family housing and accessory uses.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CITY OF SANTA ROSA PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 11, 2016 APPLICANT.

ASKING PRICE: $2,950,000

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda Public Hearing Item. IG TO IL;.972 ACRES; 1021 E 31st (KES)

Disclaimer for Review of Plans

Public Hearing November 14, On Table Items

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D

PUBLIC. Public Notification. June. 11, 2013, about. invitation. 25, 2013 Community. Open House. approximately 89. Public Responsee. or unspecified).

AGENDA. 2. Review of Agenda by the Board and Addition of items of New Business to the Agenda for Consideration by the Board

The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:

How to get your city off its parking addiction Downtown Glendale s story

City and Borough of Sitka Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes of Meeting. November 17, 2009

Current Development Projects

The Town of Wasaga Beach Committee of Adjustment/Consent November 20, 2017

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Wednesday, January 4, E CESAR CHAVEZ ST 78702

REZONING APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS

For Sale Price: 2,450, West Broadway Ave., Glendale CA Excellent Development Opportunity

14 Units PROBATE SALE. Rhett Winchell Real Estate Sales & Marketing CalBRE License # VANOWEN STREET, VAN NUYS, CA 91405

Letter of Determination Suite 400

RESOLUTION NO. OB 14-02

1712 CASTRO ROOF DECK PERMIT APPEAL # RESPONDENT S BRIEF JANUARY 12, 2017

COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY/Zoning Division 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 2 nd Floor Oakland, California

Current Development Projects

NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION AND PUBLIC MEETING ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION PUBLIC MEETING

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

10,100 sf medical/office development opportunity

Rapid City Planning Commission Vacation of Right-of-Way Project Report April 21, 2016

Scenario Guide and Reference Sheet

Active Planning Applications (Projects are alphabetical by street name) Updated December 2018

2. Rezone a portion of the lot from R2 (Small Lot Residential) to RD2 (Duplex: Housing Lane).

Alternatives September 25, ALTERNATIVES. No Action Alternative

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meetings of June 20, 2018 and June 27, 2018.

1.0 Introduction. November 9, 2017

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS (ZBOA) MEETING AGENDA

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

Analysis of Infill Development Potential Under the Green Line TOD Ordinance

Gulf Boulevard, Indian Rocks Beach

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

Chairman Byrne called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and noted a quorum was present.

Recommendation: The Public Works Director-Engineering recommends adoption of the following resolution.

STAFF REPORT. Lee County School Board APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER DOCKET/CASE/APPLICATION NUMBER

City of Lafayette Staff Report Planning Commission

LOWELL CHARTER TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AND REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 8, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING

MINUTES of a Regular Meeting of the MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION held on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. with the following in attendance:

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011

Rapid City Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit Project Report

Community Development

187 Acres in Opportunity Zone - Rancho Diamante Existing Income - Domenigioni Parkway - Hemet, CA

Transcription:

AGENDA REPORT CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY BUENA SANITATION DISTRICT JOINT POWERS FINANCING AUTHORITY Department: Community Development Item No: D1 Prepared By: Michael Ressler, Principal Planner Meeting Date: January 12, 2016 John Conley, Director Approved By: Patrick Johnson, City Manager Agenda Location: Discussion SUBJECT: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AT 2100 W. SAN MARCOS BOULEVARD RECOMMENDATION: Discuss a proposal to amend the General Plan land use designation and amend the Vista Business Park Specific Plan regarding the property located at 2100 W. San Marcos Boulevard, and provide direction to staff. PRIOR ACTION: None. STATEMENT ON THE SUBJECT: Integral Communities has submitted an application (PC19-076) to amend the General Plan land use designation and amend the Vista Business Park Specific Plan for a 17.17-acre parcel located at 2100 W. San Marcos Boulevard (see (Exhibit 1 for a location map). The subject site is currently vacant land that has been rough-graded to accommodate five industrial parcels, which were approved in 2011 under the Tentative Parcel Map process. The proposed project would develop the property with a mixed-use development consisting of 196 two and three story condominium units and an approximately 100-room four story hotel. Vehicle access would be provided by a private access road from San Marcos Boulevard, which would separate the residential component of the project from the hotel site. General Plan and Zoning. The current General Plan land use designation is Research Light Industrial (RLI) (see Exhibit 2 for land use designations). The current zoning designation for the property is Specific Plan (SPI). The property is located within the Vista Business Park Specific Plan Planning Area B which allows a range of light industrial land uses including research and development, distribution facilities, and manufacturing (see Exhibit 3 for zoning designations). The current RLI General Plan land use designation and Vista Business Park Specific Plan Planning Area B does not allow for mixed-use development opportunities for the subject site; therefore, the applicant is requesting to amend the RLI land use designation on the property to Mixed Use (MU), and amend the Vista Business Park Specific Plan to create a new mixed-use Planning Area for the property. Site Development Plan. The conceptual site plan and architectural elevations for the project are included as Exhibit 4. The site plan and elevations are intended to provide the City Council with a conceptual view of the proposed development plan for the property. In addition, the developer is providing two alternative development scenarios for the City Council s consideration. Alternative Plan 1 ACTION: Clerk/Secretary 1/12/2016 D1 1 of 45

MEETING DATE: January 12, 2016 PAGE: 2 SUBJECT: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT AT 2100 W. SAN MARCOS BOULEVARD consists of 214 condominium units, 4,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, and a transient occupancy tax inlieu fee. Alternative Plan 2 consists of 196 condominium units, 4,000 sq. ft. of commercial space, and a 78-room extended stay hotel. If the proposed land use changes are supported, the site plan and application would be subject to staff review, environmental review, a public hearing at the Planning Commission, and a public hearing at the City Council. Parking. Parking is a critical factor in the design of the project. Staff is requesting additional input from the City Council regarding the applicable parking standards for the project. The applicant is requesting use of the MU Zone standards, which have separate requirements for the hotel and multi-family residential components of the project. According to the conceptual site plan, the hotel site would provide a total of 100 parking spaces, which complies with the MU Zone and citywide parking standards. The MU Zone parking standards for multifamily residential are lower than the citywide parking standards. The MU Zone parking standards (inclusive of guest parking) require 2 spaces per two-bedroom unit, 2.25 spaces per three-bedroom unit, and 2.75 spaces per four-bedroom unit, which equates to a requirement of 467 parking spaces for the proposed project. The citywide parking standards for multi-family residential (inclusive of guest parking) require 2.5 spaces per two-bedroom unit, 3 spaces per three-bedroom unit, and 3.5 spaces per fourbedroom unit, which equates to a requirement of 607 parking spaces for the proposed project. The conceptual plan submitted by the applicant relies on the MU Zone standards and provides a total of 466 parking spaces for the multi-family residential component of the project. FISCAL IMPACT: Based on the County Assessor s records, this property has a current assessed value of approximately $1.2 million. The annual property tax received by the City is estimated at $1,680. If the Integral Communities project were to be developed on the site, the estimated annual property tax collected by the City would be approximately $126,000 based on an estimated value of $90 million for the project at completion. In the event the site was developed industrially, the estimated annual property tax received by the City would range from $25,000 to $35,000 based on 283,000 sq. ft. of light industrial buildings developed on the subject site. An economic analysis provided by the developer for the potential transient occupancy tax revenue is included as Exhibit 5. This analysis has not been vetted or verified by a fiscal consultant representing the City. EXHIBITS: 1. Project location map (Page 3) 2. Existing and proposed General Plan land use designations 3. Existing and proposed zoning designations (Page 5) 4. Conceptual site plan and architectural elevations (Page 6) 5. Economic analysis (Page 33) 6. Project Correspondence (Page 40) (Page 4) 1/12/2016 D1 2 of 45

EXHIBIT 1: PROJECT LOCATION MAP VISTA PALOMAR PROJECT Business Park Dr Project Location: 2100 W. San Marcos Blvd EXHIBIT 1 1/12/2016 D1 3 of 45

General Plan Amendment I 0 500 1,000 Feet General Commercial (GC) Executive Ridge Business Park Dr Poinsettia Av Rosas Corporate View Michelle Avenida Avenida De Las Research Light Industrial (RLI) Island Shore Wy W San Marcos Blvd Acacia Existing Dr General Commercial (GC) Executive Ridge Business Park Dr Poinsettia Av Rosas Corporate View Michelle Avenida Avenida De Las Research Light Industrial (RLI) Mixed Use (MU) Island Shore Wy W San Marcos Blvd Disclaimer: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Acacia Proposed 1/12/2016 EXHIBIT 2 D1 4 of 45 Dr Rev 12/9/2015

Specific Plan Amendment I 0 500 1,000 Feet Business Park Specific Plan Planning Area A Executive Ridge Business Park Dr Poinsettia Av Rosas Business Park Specific Plan Planning Area B Corporate View Michelle Avenida Avenida De Las Island Shore Wy W San Marcos Blvd Acacia Existing Dr Business Park Specific Plan Planning Area A Executive Ridge Business Park Dr Poinsettia Av Rosas Corporate View Michelle Avenida Avenida De Las Business Park Specific Plan Planning Area B Business Park Specific Plan Planning Area G Island Shore Wy W San Marcos Blvd Disclaimer: This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. Acacia Proposed 1/12/2016 EXHIBIT 3 D1 5 of 45 Dr Rev 12/9/2015

1/12/2016 EXHIBIT 4 D1 6 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 7 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 8 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 9 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 10 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 11 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 12 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 13 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 14 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 15 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 16 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 17 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 18 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 19 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 20 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 21 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 22 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 23 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 24 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 25 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 26 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 27 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 28 of 45

SCALE: NOVEMBER 13, 2015 RIGHT LEFT REAR FRONT PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE COMMERCIAL ELEVATIONS 0 8 16 24 ARCHITECTURE VISTA PALOMAR 5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404 Bonsall, CA 92003 760.724.1198 VISTA, CA INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES 2235 Encinitas Blvd., Suite 216 Encinitas, CA 92024 (760) 419-5432 A-20 1/12/2016 D1 29 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 30 of 45

VISTA, CA INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES 2235 Encinitas Blvd., Suite 216 Encinitas, CA 92024 (760) 419-5432 EXTENDED STAY ELEVATIONS BUILDING A NOVEMBER 16, 2015 0 8 16 24 SCALE: ARCHITECTURE PERSPECTIVE FRONT VISTA PALOMAR 5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404 Bonsall, CA 92003 760.724.1198 1/12/2016 D1 31 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES 2235 Encinitas Blvd., Suite 216 Encinitas, CA 92024 (760) 419-5432 VISTA, CA 32 of 45 SCALE: 0 8 16 NOVEMBER 16, 2015 24 EXTENDED STAY ELEVATIONS BUILDING B LEFT ARCHITECTURE RIGHT VISTA PALOMAR 5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404 Bonsall, CA 92003 760.724.1198 FRONT REAR

EXHIBIT 5 1/12/2016 D1 33 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 34 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 35 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 36 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 37 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 38 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 39 of 45

1/12/2016 EXHIBIT 6 D1 40 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 41 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 42 of 45

1/12/2016 D1 43 of 45

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: John Conley Deborah Wagner Patsy Chow; Michael Ressler; jdesmond@san-marcos.net; jgriffin@san-marcos.net; corlando@san-marcos.net; kjabara@san-marcos.net; sjenkins@san-marcos.net; janet.mcclean@smusd.org RE: Please Read: Vista Palomar Project, PC19-076 Monday, August 10, 2015 6:49:44 AM Ms. Wagner, Thank you for your comments, they will be included in the public record and the staff reports for the project. This project is currently being reviewed by the Planning staff for completeness and no date for hearing has been set. I will include your name and address in the notification list and you will be sent notice of any public meetings related to the project. If you have any questions in the meantime, please feel free to e-mail or call me. Thank you, John Conley Director of Community Development/Engineering City of Vista 200 Civic Center Drive Vista, CA 92084 (760) 643-5388 F (760) 639-6101 From: Deborah Wagner [mailto:debw888@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 3:59 PM To: John Conley <jconley@ci.vista.ca.us>; jdesmond@san-marcos.net; jgriffin@san-marcos.net; corlando@san-marcos.net; kjabara@san-marcos.net; sjenkins@san-marcos.net; janet.mcclean@smusd.org Subject: Please Read: Vista Palomar Project, PC19-076 Dear Sirs and Madams Desmond, Conley, Griffin, Orlando, Jabara, Jenkins, and McClean, I am a resident of The Laurels development; homes in San Marcos that range in size from 1700 3000 square feet on decent sized parcels-not huge, just decent. It s a super nice midlevel, caring, family-oriented community. A neighbor of mine brought to my attention the Vista Palomar (PC19-076). The property is located roughly at the north east corner of Business Park Drive and San Marcos Boulevard. Our community is directly across San Marcos Boulevard from the proposed project. The project is technically part of the City of Vista, but access is via San Marcos Boulevard, and children would attend San Marcos Unified School District schools. As you may be aware, the property is currently zoned as light commercial/industrial and a request by Ninia Hammond has been received by the City of Vista to rezone the property to mixed use. I am adamantly opposed to this project and the rezoning of this property in the way that the concept design and the application specifies. As you can see from the attached image of the concept design, the developers are attempting to cram 196 two and three story townhouses, 1/12/2016 D1 44 of 45

plus a 100 room hotel onto a flat plot of land just shy of 17 acres. I m assuming the residential portion is intended for young professionals and their families. There is zero amount of open space and what is not covered with structures is asphalt. Why am I opposed? I am opposed to the mixed use rezoning I am adamantly opposed to the density of the project Hotels and residential in such close proximity is not conducive to the safety of children I am opposed that for this amount of residential density plus a hotel, there is only a single entry/exit point I am opposed to the incredible increase in traffic the project would impose upon an already congested major artery This is not about not in my back yard. I know that this property will be developed. However, it should be developed in a manner that is consistent with the area around it. What I would be in favor of: Residential, including townhouses at roughly a 50% density reduction, including playgrounds and open space, with no hotel, or Light industrial and possibly a hotel. I tried very hard to locate the Vista City Council meeting where this rezoning will be discussed. Mr. Conley, could you please forward the information at your earliest convenience. Best Regards, Deborah Wagner 1982 Falling Leaf Court, San Marcos, CA 92078 760.536.9083 1/12/2016 D1 45 of 45